Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. INTRODUCTION
In the early stage of mankind, tools were made of stone for the item being made. When iron
tools were invented, desirable metals and more sophisticated articles could be produced. In
twentieth century products were made from the most durable and consequently, the most un-
machinable materials. In an effort to meet the manufacturing challenges created by these
materials, tools have now evolved to include materials such as alloy steel, carbide, diamond and
ceramics. The conventional manufacturing processing use today for material
removal primarily rely on electric motors and hard tool materials to perform tasks such as
sawing, drilling and broaching.
Material removal processes once again can be divided into two groups
1. Conventional Machining Processes
2. Non-Traditional Manufacturing Processes or non-conventional Manufacturing processes
Conventional Machining Processes mostly remove material in the form of chips by applying
forces on the work material with a wedge shaped cutting tool that is harder than the work
material under machining condition.
Conventional forming operations are performed with the energy from electric
motors, hydraulics and gravity. Likewise, material joining is conventionally accomplished with
thermal energy sources such as burning gases and electric arcs. In contrast, non-traditional
manufacturing processes harness energy sources considered unconventional by yesterday’s
standards. Material removal can now accomplished with electrochemical reaction, high
temperature plasmas and high-velocity jets of liquids and abrasives. Materials that in the past
have been extremely difficult to form, are now formed with magnetic fields, explosives and the
shock waves from powerful electric sparks. Material joining capabilities have been expanded
with the use of high frequency sound waves and beams of electrons and coherent light.
With the development of technology, more and more challenging problems are faced by the
scientists and technologists in the field of manufacturing. The difficulty in adapting the
traditional manufacturing processes can be attributed mainly to the following basic sources:
The many new materials and alloys that have been developed for specific uses possess a very
low machinability. Producing complicated geometries in such materials becomes extremely
difficult with the usual methods. Also, sometimes the combination of the material properties and
the job dimensions is such that the use of the traditional processes becomes impossible.
Examples of these types of jobs are machining a complicated turbine blade made of super
alloys, and producing holes and slots (both through and blind) in materials such as glass and
semiconductors. At times, the job becomes difficult because of the dimensional complications.
So, drilling a noncircular hole or a micro hole becomes problematic (and sometimes
impossible) if the traditional processes are used. Apart from the situations cited, higher
production rate and economic requirements may demand the use of non-traditional (or
unconventional) machining processes.
Extremely hard and brittle materials are difficult to machine by traditional machining
processes such as turning, drilling, shaping and milling. Nontraditional machining processes,
also called advanced manufacturing processes, are employed where traditional machining
processes are not feasible, satisfactory or economical due to special reasons as outlined below.
Several types of non-traditional machining processes have been developed to meet extra
required machining conditions. When these processes are employed properly, they offer many
advantages over non-traditional machining processes. The common non-traditional machining
processes are described in this section.
The strength of steel alloys has increased five folds due to continuous R and D effort. In
aero-space requirement of High strength at elevated temperature with light weight led to
development and use of hard titanium alloys, nimonic alloys, and other HSTR alloys. The
ultimate tensile strength has been improved by as much as 20 times. Development of cutting
tools which has hardness of 80 to 85 HRC which cannot be machined economically in
conventional methods led to development of non–traditional machining methods.
♦ Intricate shaped blind hole – e.g. square hole of 15 mm x 15 mm with a depth of 30 mm with a
tolerance of 100 microns.
♦ Deep hole with small hole diameter – e.g. φ 1.5 mm hole with l/d = 20
1. Material removal may occur with chip formation or even no chip formation may take
place. For example in AJM, chips are of microscopic size and in case of
Electrochemical machining material removal occurs due to electrochemical dissolution at
atomic level.
2. In NTM, there may not be a physical tool present. For example in laser jet machining,
machining is carried out by laser beam. However in Electrochemical Machining there
is a physical tool that is very much required for machining.
3. In NTM, the tool need not be harder than the work piece material. For example, in EDM,
copper is used as the tool material to machine hardened steels.
4. Mostly NTM processes do not necessarily use mechanical energy to provide material
removal. They use different energy domains to provide machining. For example, in USM,
AJM, WJM mechanical energy is used to machine material.
2. Material removal rate is limited by NTM can machine difficult to cut and hard
mechanical properties of work material. to cut materials like titanium, ceramics,
nimonics, SST, composites,
semiconducting materials.
3. Relative motion between the tool and Many NTM are capable of producing
work is typically rotary or complex 3D shapes and cavities
reciprocating. Thus the shape of work is
limited to circular or flat shapes. In
spite of CNC systems, production of
3Dsurfaces is still a difficult task
4. Machining of small cavities , slits, blind Machining of small cavities, slits and
holes or through holes are difficult Production of non-circular, micro sized,
large aspect ratio, shall entry angle holes
are easy using NTM
5. Use relative simple and inexpensive Non-traditional processes requires
machinery and readily available cutting expensive tools and equipment as well as
tools skilled labour, which increase the
production cost significantly
6. Capital cost and maintenance cost is Capital cost and maintenance cost is high
low
When small and hard metallic particles are made vibrating against the work piece to be
machined, the material is removed by shear action and abrasion. This phenomenon generally
takes place in case of ultrasonic machining.
NTM processes can be divided into four groups based upon the material removal mechanism:
1. Chemical-Chemical reaction between a liquid reagent and the work piece results in etching.
•Mechanical Processes
•Electrochemical Processes
•Electro-Thermal Processes
•Chemical Processes
Thus, these non-conventional processes can be classified into various groups according to the
basic requirements which are as follows:
The correct selection of the non-traditional machining methods must be based on the
following aspects.
i) Physical parameters of the process
ii) Shape to be machined
iii) Process capability
iv) Economics of the processes
effect of metal removal rate on the power consumed by various non-conventional machining
processes shown in fig. 1.2. It is found that some of the processes (e.g. EBM, ECM) above the
mean power consumption line consume a greater amount of power than the processes (e.g. EDM,
PAM, ECG) below the mean power consumption line. Thus, the capital cost involved in the
processes (EBM, ECM etc.) lying above the mean line is high whereas for the processes below
that line (e.g., EDM, PAM, MCG) is comparatively low.
USM is suitable for machining of refractory type of material while AJM are for super
alloys and refractory materials.
The capital cost of ECM is very high when compared with traditional mechanical contour
grinding and other non-conventional machining processes whereas capital costs for AJM and
PAM are comparatively low. EDM has got higher tooling cost than other machining processes.
Power consumption is very low for PAM and LBM processes whereas it is greater in case of
ECM. The metal removal efficiency is very high for EBM and LBM than for other processes. In
conclusion, the suitability of application of any of the processes is dependent upon various
factors and must be considered all or some of them before applying no conventional processes.
(ii) Disadvantages:
1. USM
➢ Hard, brittle work materials such as ceramics, glass, and carbides, precious stones, and
hardened steels.
➢ Also successful on certain metals, such as stainless steel and titanium
➢ Shapes include non-round holes, holes along a curved axis.
2. AJM
➢ Normally used as a finishing process rather than cutting process
➢ Applications: deburring, trimming and cleaning, and polishing
➢ Work materials: thin flat stock of hard, brittle materials (e.g., glass, silicon, mica,
ceramics)
3. WJM
➢ Used in mining, aerospace.
➢ Cutting thin details in stone, glass and metals.
➢ Drilling of titanium materials.
4. ECM
➢ Used in tool & die making industries, automotive, aerospace, power generation, oil &
gas industries.
➢ Facing & turning complex 3D surfaces, deburring, grinding, honing, trepanning,
broaching, multiple hole drilling etc.
5. LBM
➢ LBM is used to perform precision micro-machining on all materials such as steel,
ceramic, glass, diamond, graphite etc.
➢ It is used for cutting, drilling, marking, scribing etc.
6. PAM
➢ Manufacturers of transportation and agricultural equipment, aircraft components etc.
➢ Used in sawing, cutting, drilling, machining, and punching.
➢ Also used in the heating, ventilating, air conditioning industries to cut complex work.