You are on page 1of 7

5022 J . Phys. Chem.

1990, 94, 5022-5028

measured complexation equilibrium constants by a variety of Experimental Section


techniques and a certain consistency of results emerges. Certain The coumarins were commercially available laser-grade ma-
small molecules (such as ethanol and acetonitrile have significant terials obtained from Eastman Kodak Co. or Exciton Chemical
constants while others like dimethyl sulfoxide have relatively small Co. and used in most cases as received following TLC analysis
constant^.^ Cyclohexanol and phenol were noteworthy for their for impurities. CI F was synthesized and purified as described
particularly large constants. Coinclusion phenomena have been p r e v i ~ u s l y . The
~ ~ cyclodextrins were obtained from Aldrich
noted not only with cyclodextrins but also with Chemical Co. and used as received. Emission spectra were re-
Noteworthy in several studies of cyclodextrin complexes is the corded on a Perkin-Elmer MPF-44A fluorescence spectropho-
sensitivity of the structure of the complex as a function of the tometer equipped with a differential spectrum correction unit or
structure of the cyclodextrin and the included molecules.6,1’,25 a Perkin-Elmer MPF-2A instrument. Spectra were recorded at
room temperature and integrated intensities were obtained by
(20) Veno, A,; Takahashi, K.; Osa, T J . Chem. Soc., Chem Commun. cut-and-weigh.
1980, 1921-1922.
(21) Lindner, K.: Saenger, W. Angew. Chem.. Int. E d . EngI. 1978. 17. Acknowledgment. Support for this work by The Office of Naval
694-695. Research, Research Corporation, and the Charles A. Dana
(22) Russell. J . C.; Wild, U . P.; Whitten. D.G. J . Phys. Chem. 1986, 90, Foundation is gratefully acknowledged.
1 3 I 9- I 323.
(23) Thomas, J. K . Chem. Reo. 1980, 8. 283-299.
(24) Jones 11, G.; Jackson, W. R.; Choi, C.; Bergmark. W. R J . Phys. (25) Turro, N J.; Okubo, T.; Chung, C. J Am. Chem Sot. 1982. 104,
Chem. 1985, 89. 294-300. 3954-3957

Effect .of Structure in Selective Oxide Catalysis: Oxidation Reactions of Ethanol and
Ethane on Vanadium Oxide

S. Ted Oyama*
Department of Chemical Engineering, Clarkson University, Potsdam, New York I3676

and Cabor A . Somorjai


Department of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720
(Received: August 31, 1989; In Final Form: November 7 , 1989)

The catalytic activity of well-characterized samples of vanadium oxide supported on silica were studied for the partial oxidation
of ethanol and ethane. Surface vanadium atoms were counted by a new oxygen chemisorption technique which allowed
measurements of sample dispersions and turnover rates. Ethanol oxidation was found to be a structure-insensitive reaction
that produced mostly acetaldehyde. Ethane oxidation was different; while its overall turnover rate changed little with vanadium
oxide dispersion, its selectivity did vary with catalyst structure. The products of this reaction were mostly ethylene and
acetaldehyde, but at low temperatures on the highest dispersion catalysts there was excess carbon dioxide formation.

Introduction employ the results of a recently developed method for counting


For catalytic reactions on metals the structure of the surface surface sites on supported and unsupported vanadium oxide. The
can exert a profound influence on catalytic activity and selectivity. effect of dispersion in the critical range is investigated for two
For catalytic reactions on oxides the effects of structure are known reactions: ethanol and ethane oxidation. We find that the oxi-
to a much lesser extent but have been receiving increasing at-
tention. Recent studies have investigated the structure sensitivity ( I ) Berlowitz, P.; Kung, H. H. J . A m . Chem. SOC.1986, 108, 3532.
of stoichiometric reactions on available oxide single crystals like (2) Vohs, J. M.; Barteau, M. A. J . Phys. Chem. 1987, 91, 4766.
Zn0,’-3 Ti02,4-5 or oxide thin films like Mg063’ or V 2 0 5 . s Other (3) Vohs, J. M.; Barteau, M. A. Surf.Sci. 1988, 197, 109.
(4) Onishi, H.; Aruga, T.; Egawa, C.; Iwasawa, Y . Surf. Sci. 1988, 193,
studies have relied on preparation of samples with different ratios 33.
of exposed crystal facesg-13 for investigations of the effect of ( 5 ) Kim, K. S.; Barteau, M. A. Surf. Sci., in press.
structure. The subject area has been reviewed.14-” (6) Martinez, R.; Barteau, M. A. Langmuir 1985, 1, 684.
A common approach for investigating the effect of structure (7) Barteau, M. A.; Peng, X. D. Mater. Chem. Phys. 1988, 18, 425.
(8) Lewis, K. B.; Oyama, S. T.; Somorjai, G. A. Surf. Sci., in press.
in metal catalysis is to study the response of reactivity to dispersion, (9) Volta, J. C.; Desquesnes, W.; Moraweck, B.; Coudurier, G. React.
the ratio of surface to total atoms in a small metal particle.’* In Kinet. Catal. Lett. 1979, 12, 241.
the critical region where particle diameters grow from atomic sizes ( I O ) Volta, J. C.;Forissier, M.; Theobald, F.; Pham, T. P. Faraday Dis-
to I O nm. the surface structure evolves from isolated atoms to large cuss. Chem. SOC.1981, 72, 225.
( 1 I ) Tatibouet, J . M.; Germain, J . E. C. R . Seances Acad. Sci. 1980, 290,
multiatomic and multilayered ensembles as found in the exposed 321.
planes of macroscopic single crystal^.'^,^^ In this region the (12) Tatibouet, J. M.; Germain, J. E. J . Catal. 1981, 72, 375.
dispersion decreases from 100% to very small values, and the effect (13) Oyama, S. T. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1988, 61, 2585.
of structure on reactivity can be assessed. (14) Henrich, V. E. f r o g . SurJ. Sci. 1979, 9, 143.
(15) Volta, J . C.; Portefaix, J . L. Appl. Catal. 1985, 18, 1.
Ilnfortunately, the effect of dispersion has rarely been used in (16) Kung, H . H. Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Deo. 1986, 25, 171.
the study of oxide catalysts because of the difficulty in measuring (17) Barteau, M. A,; Vohs, J. M. In Successful Design of Catalysts; Inui.
the number of surface atoms in oxides. In this investigation w e T.. Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1988; p 89.
( 1 8 ) Boudart, M. Adc. C a t d 1969, 20, 153.
____ (19) Van Hardeveld, R.; Hartog, F. Surf. Sci. 1969, 15, 189.
*To whoin correspondence should be addressed. (20) Ptrez. 0.-L.; Romeu, D.: YacamBn, M. J . J. Catal. 1983, 79, 240.

0022-3654/90/2094-S022$02.50/0 1990 American Chemical Society


Reactions of Ethanol and Ethane on Vanadium Oxide The Journal of Physical Chemistry, Vol. 94, No. 12, 1990 5023

TABLE I: Oxygen Uptake on Silica-Supported Vanadium Oxide


before reaction“ after ethane oxidation
0, uptake,c 0, uptake:
sample SA,” m2 g-I wmol g-l dispd SA,b m2 g-I wmol g-l dispd
Si02 99 0.6 58
0.3% V205/S!O2 15.3 0.93 61 9.2 0.56
1.4% v20s/s102 92 67.0 0.87 50 26.2 0.34
3.5% V205/Si02 95 133 0.69 56 57.4 0.30
5.6% V205/Si0, 82 142 0.46 59 63.4 0.21
7.7% V205/Si02 78 191 0.45 63 126 0.29
9.8% V20,/Si02 82 258 0.48 59 180 0.33
100% v20s 2.8 7.3 0.001 4.9 13.0 0.002
” Reference 21. bSurface area. COxygenmolecule uptake. dDispersion = fraction of V atoms a t the surface, assuming Oadr/Vaurl
= I.
dation of ethanol is structure insensitive. Ethane oxidation, and an inhibitor in oxidation reactions.
however, exhibits a large change in selectivity (ethylene vs carbon In all cases amounts of catalyst corresponding to 7.0 mg of V205
dioxide production) with dispersion while the overall reaction rate were loaded in the reactor. Si02diluent was also added so that
is independent of surface structure. the total sample weight was 500 mg, corresponding to a constant
bed volume of 3.1 cm3. The only exceptions were for the 0.3%
Experimental Section V 2 0 5 sample for which 7.0 mg of V2Os resulted in 2.33 g of total
The supported V2Os catalysts were prepared by impregnating sample and for the pure unsupported V 2 0 5in which case 5.4 g
Si02( C a b - O M , 90 m2 8-l) to incipient wetness with vanadium was used. For analysis a gas chromatograph with a FID (Poropak
oxalate solutions formed from N H 4 V 0 3 (Aldrich, 99.99%) and QS column) and a TC detector (Carbosphere column) was used.
oxalic acid (Adrich, 99.99%). Vanadium oxide concentrations Rates are reported as turnover rates based on surface vanadium
are reported as weight percent throughout the paper. The solids atoms counted by oxygen chemisorption:
were dried for 2 h at 573 K and calcined for 12 h at 773 K. They
were used as powders of mesh size < 120 (particle size, L < 0.012 0, =
QYX
-
cm), except in diffusion limitation tests where they were pressed vw2s
to 10 MPa and sieved to 6C-120 mesh ( L = 0.025 cm) and 30-60
The validity of the chemisorption technique has been established
mesh ( L = 0.040 cm). Pure unsupported V,Os (Aldrich, Gold
elsewhere.2’ In the equation above ut is the total ethanol or ethane
Label, 99.999%) in the form of a fine powder ( L < 0.012 cm)
turnover rate, Q is the total volumetric flow rate, y is the mole
was used as received.
fraction of ethanol or ethane, Vis the molar volume at the con-
Surface areas (BET) and oxygen uptakes were measured with
dition of flow measurement, w is the weight of catalyst, and 2 s
a flow apparatus equipped with a thermal conductivity (TC)
is the oxygen uptake value. The factor of 2 accounts for the
detector. BET areas were obtained by flashing samples equili-
stoichiometry of one chemisorbed oxygen molecule per two surface
brated in a 30% N 2 / H e stream. Oxygen uptakes were measured
vanadium atoms. The conversion, x, is defined as the fraction
at 641 K on samples reduced in H 2 at the same temperature by
of ethanol or ethane that reacts. The other turnover rates are
adsorbing calibrated pulses of 02.
defined as
Catalytic activity was obtained in a 16-mm-o.d./14-mm-i.d.
quartz packed-bed flow reactor. A sealed quartz capillary tube ci = u,s,
held axially in the center allowed a thermocouple to probe tem-
perature gradients along the reactor length. Axial temperature where S,,the selectivity of product i, represents the fraction of
differences of a few kelvin were detected only at the highest ethanol or ethane that gets converted to i and takes into consid-
conversions. I n all experiments, the total flow rate was 73-74 eration the number of carbon atoms in the product. (Thus, CO
Kmol s-I and the total pressure was 101 kPa. (Flow rates in Mmol or C 0 2 production is divided by 2.) The turnover rates are given
s-l may be converted to cm3 (NTP) min-’ by multiplying by 1.5.) in units of ks-I equivalent to IO-) s-l.
In the ethanol oxidation studies the partial pressures of reactants Particular care was used to ensure that the catalysts were stable
were PEtOH = 1.6 kPa, Po, = 28 kPa, PHZO = 10 kPa, and PHe at the reaction conditions employed. Before every run the catalysts
= 61 kPa. I n the ethane oxidation studies these were PCHtCH, -- were pretreated in the 02-H20-He reactant flow mixture for 1
13 kPa, Po, = 28 kPa, PHlO= I O kPa, and PHe= 50 kPa. The h at the maximum temperature of reaction. The temperature was
ethane contained a 0.5% ethylene impurity whose presence was then lowered and the hydrocarbon added to the feed. Reactivity
taken into consideration in the rate calculations. The ethane was measurements were then taken at increasng temperatures while
purified from possible sulfur impurities by passage through a verifying that steady state was reached. Each point typically
reduced N i / S i 0 2 bed. All other gases were research grade required 1-2 h, and runs of 16-24 h were carried out. Importantly,
(Matheson, >99.995%) and were employed as received with flow after the highest temperature was attained, a lower temperature
rates adjusted by rotometers. The liquids, including the unde- measurement was always repeated to verify catalyst stability and
natured ethanol, were also research grade (Aldrich, 99.99%). They lack of deactivation during the rate data acquisition. These points
were loaded into a syringe pump and metered into an on-line are indicated by arrows in Figures 1,3, and 4. Carbon and oxygen
evaporator. All inlet and outlet lines were made of stainless steel mass balances closed to 100 f 5%.
and were heat-traced. Results
The ethanol partial pressure was chosen to be below the lower
flammability limit (5 kPa). The ethane partial pressure was chosen Oxygen Chemisorption. The chemisorbed oxygen uptake values
to be above the upper flammability limit (10 kPa) because the of the fresh catalysts are reported in Table I. It was found that
lower limit ( 3 kPa) made the analysis for products at low con- the catalysts employed in the ethanol oxidation reaction had
versions difficult. Although these choices caused the ethanol and essentially the same uptakes and surface areas after reaction.
ethane feeds to be oxygen-rich and oxygen-lean with respect to However, the catalysts employed in the higher temperature ethane
combustion stoichiometry, the conversions were such that there oxidation lost surface area. This loss occurred in the initial
was always excess oxygen. For the ethanol and ethane studies hydrothermal activation period and not during reaction, and thus
the maximum O2conversions were 17% and 33% at the maximum the rate measurements remain accurate. However, for this reason,
reactant conversions of 100% and 20%, respectively.
The H 2 0 partial pressure was kept high in order to reduce (21) Oyama, S. T.; Went, G.T.; Lewis, K. B.; Bell, A. T.; Somorjai, G.
variations due to conversion level. H 2 0 is a product of reaction A . J . Phys. Chem. 1989. 93, 6786.
5024 The Journal of Physical Chemistry, Vol. 94, No. 12, I990 Oyama and Somorjai

TABLE 11: Representative Conversion and Selectivity Values in Ethanol Oxidation


sample conversion, % %
SCH,CHO- S C H ~%C H ~ SA~OH,
% SCO$ % ut, ks-'
T = 490 K
Si02 0.4 100
I .4% V20s/Si02 2.0 84 4 6 6 0.32
3.5% V20s/Si02 3.5 77 2 11 IO 0.97
5.6% V2OS/S1O2 5.5 77 1 II 11 2.2
7.7% V205/Si02 3.9 65 1 17 17 1.3
9.8% V205/Si02 3.8 74 1 14 11 1.6
T = 530 K
SiO, 1.5 98 2
I .4% v ~ o ~ / s~o~ 5.0 77 13 5 5 0.97
3.5% V205/Si02 12 66 8 12 14 27
5.6% V205/Sj02 15 66 6 14 14 5.8
1.7% V205/S102 13 59 4 17 20 4.1
9.8% V205/Si02 12 66 4 15 15 4.2
T = 570 K
Si02 6.8 87 3 IO
1.4% V20s/Sj02 15 62 30 4 4 3.0
3.5% V20s/S102 30 56 26 9 9 7.3
5.6% V20s/Si02 35 61 I5 12 12 14
7.7% V205/S102 35 59 11 15 15 13
9.8% V205/S102 30 62 11 14 13 12
p--€--
__ -_
b ) I'

7 10 t 0 9 8%
I" x 77%
.
v)
Y 5 6 %

I
A

0
c

2 1 1
L
m
5 t
0
E i
2 01 I

Too i
Temperature / K t
1
h
h
Figure 1. Conversion and selectivity in ethanol oxidation: X, conversion; , Ethylene Acetic Acid
0, acetaldehyde; 0,ethylene; 0, acetic acid; V, carbon monoxide; A, 0.01 I )L2 1 -,
1.6 1.8 2 . 0 2 . 2 2 . 4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 2 . 4
carbon dioxide. (a) SO,;(b) 1.4% V205/Si02;(c) 3.5% V20s/Si02;(d)
5.6% V205/Si0,;(e) 7.7% V20s/Si0,; (f) 9.8% V20s/Si02. 103 T - ~ I K - '
Figure 2. Arrhenius plots in ethanol oxidation: V, 1.4% V20s/Si02;0,
for the ethane oxidation reaction the turnover rates were based
3.5% V205/Si02;A, 5.6% V20s/Si02;X , 7.7% V20s/Si02;0,9.8%
on oxygen chemisorption at 641 K on the catalysts after reaction V20s/Si02. (a) total turnover rate; (b) acetaldehyde rate; (c) ethylene
(Table I). rate; (d) acetic acid rate.
Table I also reports vanadium oxide dispersions, defined as the
fraction of vanadium atoms on the surface as measured by oxygen ether, or higher coupling products were ever observed, although
chemisorption. These range from 0.93 to 0.45 for the catalysts these were detectable. Silica had a considerably smaller activity
used in ethanol oxidation and from 0.56 to 0.21 for those used and differed from vanadium oxide in producing mostly acet-
in ethane oxidation. aldehyde and no ethylene at low conversions. All conclusions in
Ethanol Oxidation. Ethanol oxidation was studied between this study will be drawn from data at low conversions where the
400 and 700 K on the silica-supported samples. The results are silica remains chemically inert, as shown in Figure 1 and Table
summarized in Figure 1 and Table 11. All samples showed similar 11, and where product decomposition does not occur.
behavior regardless of dispersion; at low temperatures the main Arrhenius plot for the various products summarize the effect
product was acetaldehyde while at high temperaures it was of dispersion on the turnover rate as shown in Figure 2 and Table
ethylene. Acetic acid was produced at intermediate temperatures, 111. The activation energies do not vary drastically from sample
and CO and COz were produced at the most elevated tempera- to sample, and there are no trends. The average values for ac-
tures. At these highest temperatures traces of methane were etaldehyde, ethylene, acetic acid, and COXare 5 1, 120, 64, and
occassionally detected, probably from the homogeneous decom- 66 kJ mol-'. The Arrhenius plots are linear except for the acetic
position of the acetaldehyde product. No formaldehyde, ethyl acid product (Figure 2d) because it is probably an intermediate
Reactions of Ethanol and Ethane on Vanadium Oxide The Journal of Physical Chemistry, Vol. 94, No. 12, 1990 5025

60 X Conrersion
0 CH3CHO 1 0 CHJCHO
0 CH2CH2 0 CHzCH2

-.
> .
40

I
1 V
A
CO
COz
I
s
.
401 V CO
A Cop

5 0
20- , ,, /&
fn 700 800 900 % 700 800 900
Lo

Temperature / K Temperature / K

Figure 3. Conversion and selectivity in ethane oxidation:


conversion; X,
Figure 4. Conversion and selectivity in ethane oxidation:
X, conversion;
0,acetaldehyde; 0.ethylene; V, carbon monoxide; A, carbon dioxide. 0,acetaldehyde; 0,ethylene; V, carbon monoxide; A, carbon dioxide.
(a) S O 2 ; (b) 0.3% V20s/Si02;(c) 1.4% v205/siO& (d) 3 3 % V2OS/ (a) 5.6% V20s/Si02; (b) 7.7% V20s/Si02; (c) 9.8% V20s/Si02; (d)
Si02. 100% V20s.

TABLE 111: Summary of Activation Energies (in kJ mol-’) for Ethane Oxidation. As expected, the oxidation of ethane re-
Ethanol Oxidation quired much higher temperatures than the oxidation of ethanol
(Figures 3 and 4), conversions becoming appreciable only above
sample ECH~CHO ECH~CH EA~OH
~ Eco, Et 800 K. The products of the reaction were acetaldehyde, ethylene,
1.4% V 2 0 5 / S i 0 2 53 1 I8 58 67 CO, and COz. Traces of methane at high temperatures but no
3.5% V 2 0 5 / S i 0 2 48 121 63 62 59
5.6% V20s/Si02 45 1IO 67 72 51
formaldehyde, acetic acid, ethyl ether, or higher coupling products
7.7% V20s/Si02 63 123 71 68 65 were obtained.
9.8% V205/Si02 47 1 I4 60 66 53 Unlike ethanol oxidation, where small amounts of CO and COz
were observed only at the highest temperatures (>630 K), for
which is consumed at high temperature. The data tend to cluster, ethane oxidation large amounts of CO and COz were produced
although there is some spread for the acetic acid. There is a small at all temperatures (Table IV). For the supported samples
but consistent trend for the low concentration samples (1.4% and combined CO and C 0 2 selectivity tended to increase with tem-
3.5%) to have lower rates. perature to just over 50% at 870 K (Table IV). For the unsup-

TABLE IV: Conversion and Selectivitv Values in Ethane Oxidation


sample conversion, % SCH,CHO? % S C H ~%C H ~ ~ sco, % SCO*, 7% ut, ks-I
T = 800 K
Si02 0
0.3% V205/Si02 1.o 7 30 63 2.4
1.4% V205/Si02 1.5 3 19 5 73 5.1
3.5% V205/S102 0.6 12 63 IO 15 2.2
5.6% V205/Si02 0.5 7 73 9 11 3.3
7.7% V205/Si02 0.8 9 65 7 19 3.8
9.8% V 2 0 s / S i 0 2 0.5 8 59 5 28 2.7
100% V2O5 8.0 0.2 26 39 35 6.2
T = 825 K
Si02 0.1 100
0.3% V205/Si02 2.1 9 36 2 52 9.3
I .4% V 2 0 5 / S i 0 2 2.2 4 28 8 60 16
3.5% V205/Si02 1.8 11 57 10 22 15
5.6% V205/Si02 1.9 6 66 11 17 22
7.7% V205/Sj02 2.5 9 59 5 21 21
9.8% V205/S102 2.8 8 58 8 29 21
100% V 2 0 s 10 0.2 24 43 33 8.6
T = 870 K
Si02 2.9 81 4 15
0.3% V205/Si02 14 8 42 15 35 21
1.4% V205/Si02 12 5 39 13 43 30
3.5% V 2 0 5 / S i 0 2 13 5 38 22 35 63
5.6% V205/S102 12 3 46 22 29 69
7.7% V205/Si0, 14 5 46 24 30 57
9.8% V , 0 5 / S i 0 2 16 5 44 17 34 49
100% v20s 18 0.2 21 49 30 15
5026 The Journal of Physical Chemistry, Vol. 94, No. 12, 1990 Oyama and Somorjai

j a) ' b)
10 1 i

t I

. L
a!
> 1 c)
0
E
t-
10

L
1.1 1.2
L
1.3
1 -1

1.1
IO3 T - ' i K - '
1.2 1.3
r
i tL i \ , &
,
1.1
,
1.2 1.3
,

lo3 T-'/ K - '


L

1.1 1.2 1.3

Figure 5. Arrhenius plots in ethane oxidation: 0, acetaldehyde; 0, Figure 6. Arrhenius plots in ethane oxidation: 0, acetaldehyde; 0,
ethylene; V, carbon monoxide; A,carbon dioxide. (a) 0.3% V205/Si02; ethylene; V,carbon monoxide; A,carbon dioxide. (a) 5.6% V205/Si02;
(b) 1.4% V205/Si02;(c) 3.5% V205/Si02. (b) 7.7% V205/Si02;(c) 9.8% V,0s/Si02; (d) 100% V 2 0 5 .
TABLE V Summary of Activation Energies (in kJ mol-') for Ethane
Oxidation
- Eco2 - E, t .' T = 870 K
sample ECHf2H0 ECH2CH2 ECO LT HT LT HT
0.3%V20s/Si02 207 223 307 78 162 122 337
1.4% V20s/Si02 229 248 238 96 167 87 217
3.5% V205/Si02 184 224 354 323 294
5.6% V205/Si02 181 220 346 344 253
7.7% V20s/Si02 192 216 304 219 224
9.8% V20s/Si02 176 210 311 252 210
100% V2OS 70 55 93 56 72

ported 100% V 2 0 s sample this figure rose to 80%. In fact, the


100% V2Os sample had much higher selectivity to the deep ox- Ethylene
idation products throughout the entire temperature range. It also 0.1LdL- LA ~

displayed much higher conversions and less temperature depen-


dence (Figure 4d).
10
1
0.3 1.4 3 5 5.6 7.7 9 8 100
c)
I
I
t T = 870 K
The most dramatic difference between ethanol and ethane
oxidation was the sudden shift in selectivity in ethane oxidation
in going from high to low dispersion samples (Figure 3). For the
0.3% and 1.4% samples at low conversion, the main product was
C 0 2 ,and this decreased in favor of ethylene as the temperature
was raised (Figure 3b,c). For the 3.5% and higher concentration
samples this behavior was entirely reversed, with ethylene being
the main product at low conversion and carbon dioxide increasing
in its place as the temperature was raised (Figures 3d and 4a-c).
I n all cases acetaldehyde was a minority product (5-10%).
Arrhenius plots of these data reflect the same peculiar difference
between low and high vanadium concentration samples (Figures
5 and 6 ) . For the low-concentration samples the C 0 2 production
rates are high and the Arrhenius plots have curvature. For the
high concentration samples the C 0 2production rates are low and
u Acetaldehyde
0'01 0.3 1.4 3.5 5.6 7.7 9.8 100
Vanadium Loading / %
Figure 7. Effect of vanadium concentration on ethane oxidation: (a) X
the Arrhenius plots are linear. Activation energies obtained from or +, total rate; (b) 0,ethylene rate; (c) 0,acetaldehyde rate.
these plots by linear regression are summarized in Table V. There
is a clear trend toward decreasing activation energies with in- The effects of V 2 0 5 Concentration on the turnover rates are
creasing vanadium concentration. There is a very large drop in displayed at three temperatures in Figure 7. The overall rate
activation energies for the 100% V 2 0 5 sample. For the low- is seen to be relatively constant at all temperatures. However,
concentration samples values of activation energy are given at low the rates for ethylene and acetaldehyde formation increase with
temperature (LT) and high temperature (HT) because of the concentration, although the increases are modest and tend to be
curvature. leveled at higher temperatures.
Reactions of Ethanol and Ethane on Vanadium Oxide The Journal of Physical Chemistry, Vol. 94, No. 12, 1990 5027

and the absence of hysteresis indicate that no phase transitions


100
100% v*o5 occur.
Ethanol Oxidation, A Structure-Insensitive Reaction. Our
t study of ethanol oxidation was motivated in part by two studies
of methanol oxidation on vanadium oxide based catalysts that
indicated that the reaction is structure i n s e n s i t i ~ e . ~ ~Our
,~~
confirmation of structure insensitivity would validate the oxygen
chemisorption method. The first study by Baiker and Monti

40i
v C a r b o n monoxide
A C a r b o n dioxide examined the methanol oxidation activity of two unsupported
vanadium oxide samples of greatly differing external morphology
and concluded from lack of differences that the reaction was
structure insensitive.z2 A related study by Sorensen and Weber
found the same rate per vanadium atom for different hetero-
polytungstates substituted with various numbers of vanadium
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 atoms and reached the same conclusion.z3 Our study finds that
Time I s ethanol oxidation is structure insensitive, and therefore it appears
Figure 8. Conversion and selectivity in ethane oxidation in the absence that the alcohol oxidation reaction is indeed structure insensitive
of oxygen: catalyst, 100%V205,4.58 g: X, conversion: 0 , ethylene; V, over V 2 0 5 .
carbon monoxide: A, carbon dioxide. There is one study of methanol oxidation that suggests structure
sensitivity for this reaction.24 In this work the selectivity of a
The behavior of the unsupported 100% VzOs was investigated number of well-crystallized, low surface area samples of V 2 0 5
further by cutting off the gas-phase oxygen supply and following varied in proportion to the ratios of different surface planes, and
the products of ethane oxidation in time (Figure 8). At zero time the authors concluded that formaldehyde was preferentially formed
the helium flow rate was increased so as to maintain the total flow on the [OOl] planes. However, the study using low surface area
rate constant at the usual 7 3 pmol s-I. The selectivity to the materials did not report the rates per unit surface area, only
various products stabilized in -2000 s. The conversion decreased selectivities, and these can differ with conversion. The relative
slightly during this time and then gradually rose. The temperature amounts of surface planes are difficult to obtain by microscopy
remained constant at 7 5 0 K throughout the experiment. because of the difficulty of measuring crystallite sizes in three
Transport Effects. Lack of mass- and heat-transfer effects were dimensions.
checked by varying the particle size of the catalysts in both the Examination of the data (Figure 2, Table 11) reveals that the
ethane and ethanol oxidations (Figure 9). The particle size refers low-concentrationsamples of highest dispersion have turnover rates
to the macroscopic catalyst powder agglomefates obtained by that are consistently smaller and have selectivities that favor
sieving the samples, not the supported crystallites of V20s. Plots acetaldehyde over ethylene. However, these differences are minute
of conversion and selectivity for catalysts employed in this study and are accounted for by factors of 2 or 3 in rates. Such variations
( L < 0.012 cm) are shown on the left panels (Figure 9a,c) and in rate are small and are not uncharacteristic for structure-in-
reproduced on the right panels for the pressed and sieved samples sensitive reactions.l* The changes in selectivity (Figure 1 ) vary
(Figure 9b,d) of larger particle size ( L = 0.025 and 0.040 cm). smoothly and only to a small degree and display only a subtle effect
The points for the larger sized particles are seen to fall very close of surface structure. Similarly, the activation energies for the
to the plots for the fine particle sizes. overall reaction and the various products show no distinct trends
(Table 111). The exact border line in the classification of struc-
Discussion ture-sensitive and -insensitive reactions is not clearly marked,
Oxygen Chemisorption. The oxygen chemisorption technique although rate differences exceeding lo3have been associated with
employed here has been described in a recent publication in this the former.2s Ethanol oxidation on supported vanadium oxide
journal.2' It was clearly shown by using X-ray diffraction, laser should be considered a structure-insensitive reaction in the classical
Raman spectroscopy, and isotopic labeling that the method counts sense.
surface atoms and not bulk atoms. The technique relies on finding We form our conclusions from the lower conversion region of
an optimal temperature where surface but no bulk reduction the data (Table 11). It should be noted in that table that the
occurs. The finding that ethanol oxidation is a structure-insensitive highest dispersion catalyst (1.4%) has lower conversions by factors
reaction is an internal check that also confirms the validity of the of about 2. Its higher selectivity to the selective oxidation products,
method. This will be discussed in the next section. acetaldehyde and ethylene, can be understood on that basis. At
From the oxygen uptake values, vanadium dispersions can be lower conversions the effect of secondary reactions is reduced.
calculated (Table I), and these are in excellent agreement with Thus, the data consistently point to the uniform behavior of all
the Raman spectra of the same samples reported earlier.21 Thus, the catalysts.
where oxygen chemisorption shows high dispersion, the Raman Ethane Oxidation, a Structure-Directed Reaction. The oxi-
shows monatomic vanadium species on the surface; where low dation of ethane on the supported samples contrasts profoundly
dispersions are measured, small crystallites of V2Os of diameter with the oxidation of ethanol. Whereas in the oxidation of ethanol
<4 nm are observed. At high loadings the dispersions tend to reach selectivity differences were small and varied gradually with
constant values, although somewhat scattered, especially for the concentration, in ethane oxidation a considerable jump occurred
catalysts examined after the high-temperature ethane oxidation. in selectivity between loadings of 1.4% and 3.5% (Figure 3c,d).
This is due in part to the limited concentration range employed With a concentration of 1.4% and below, C 0 2 was the primary
but also to the sintering of the finer vanadium oxide crystallites. product at low temperatures, but for the 3.5% and higher con-
Nevertheless, the ethanol and ethane oxidation studies are con- centration samples, ethylene was the predominant product. Such
ducted at two ranges of dispersion, 0.93-0.45and 0.56-0.21, where marked effects of concentration are characteristic of structure-
surface structure is changing appreciably and, thus, the samples sensitive reactions. Activation energy values in ethane oxidation
are ideally suited to examine the effect of structure on catalytic
activity. (22) Baiker, A.; Monti, D. J . Coral. 1985, 91, 361.
I t is possible that the loss in surface area of the catalysts used (23) Sorensen, P.; Weber, R. S. Presented at the 2nd China-US.-Japan
in the ethane oxidation reaction may have been due to a melting Seminar on Heterogeneous Catalysis, Berkeley, CA, July 1985.
of the V 2 0 5crystallites or the formation of very mobile vanadium (24) T a t i W t , J.-M.; Germain, J.-E. C. R. Seances Acad. Sci., Ser. 2 1983,
oxide clusters. The leveling of rate at the highest temperatures 296, 613.
(25) Boudart, M . In Proceedings of the 6th Inrernational Congress on
(discussed below) may also be due to such phenomena. However, Catalysis, London, 1976; Bond, G. C.; Wells, P. B., Tompkins, F. C., Eds.;
the lack of discontinuities in the conversion and selectivity data The Chemical Society: London, 1977; p 1 .
5028 The Journal of Physical Chemistry, Vol. 94, No. 12, 1990 Oyama and Somorjai

supported samples (Figure 7 ) . It is likely that a different


mechanism is operative for the 100% V 2 0 ssample. Bulk oxides
are known to possess a vast reservoir of oxygen which becomes
highly mobile when the oxide is in a partially reduced state.
Normally, this mobile lattice oxygen is capable of selective oxi-
dation, but at the very high temperatures used in ethane oxidation
they cause overoxidation. Indeed, Figure 8 shows that when the
oxygen supply is cut off, the selectivity to C O increases and that
to ethylene decreases. Although COz formation decreases also,
the overall selectivity shifts toward less selective product formation.
100
~

C
The oxygen atoms used in forming the products integrated over
n time amount to 3900 pmol, which is 32 times the amount of
\
surface oxygen but only 0.08 times the available reducible bulk
oxygen. It is interesting to note that no acetaldehyde is formed
in the absence of gas-phase oxygen.
0.12 c m 4 ; Table V shows that there is a consistent trend for the activation
energies of the supported samples to decrease with concentration,
approaching the values for the 100% V 2 0 5sample. This is due
20
to the growth of the crystallites of the supported samples.
0- The Arrhenius plots for CO, rates for the catalysts prepared
700 aoo 900 700 800 900 with low vanadium concentrations showed curvature (Figure 5a,b),
Temperature / K and activation energy values at low temperature (LT) and high
Figure 9. Particle size effect on conversion and selectivity: X, conversion; temperature (HT) are reported (Table V). The curvature reflects
0, acetaldehyde; 0,ethylene; V, carbon monoxide; A, carbon dioxide. the production of excess C 0 2 at low temperatures and may be
(a) ethanol oxidation, 9.8% V205/Si02,L = 0.012 cm; (b) ethanol ox- due to the involvement in the reaction of some particularly active
idation, 9.8% V205/Si02,L = 0.025 cm; (c) ethane oxidation, 1.4% form of adsorbed oxygen. Again the result points to the existence
V20s/Si02.L = 0.012 cm; (d) ethane oxidation, 1.4% V,05/Si02.L = of structural effects in the reaction.
0.040 cm. Lack of Mass- and Heat-Transfer Limitations. The excellent
changed systematically with concentration (Table V), indicating agreement between the conversion and selectivity for the larger
that catalyst structure affected the various reaction pathways sized particles and the fine-sized particles (Figure 9) indicates
available. This again contrasts with the findings in the ethanol that there are no external transport effects. A detailed discussion
oxidation reaction where activation energies did not vary sys- of the internal (intraparticle) transfer effects is given in a pre-
tematically with concentration. Thus, activation energy changes liminary report of part of these results.26 It is shown there that
also point to ethane oxidation being structure sensitive. the Anderson criterion2' indicates that there are no heat-transfer
We base our conclusions on data at 800 and 825 K where limitations, and a Carberry analysis for combined heat and mass
conversions are below 3% (Table IV). At these conversion levels transfer2* yields an effectiveness factor of unity. Thus, at the
the influence of secondary reactions is minimized and so is the conditions employed in this study there are no internal or external
concern, noted for the ethanol studies, of comparing catalysts at mass- or heat-transfer effects for both ethanol and ethane oxi-
different conversions. At higher temperatures and conversions dation.
(870 K, 14%) the selectivity and rate differences between catalysts Conclusions
of different V 2 0 5concentration are largely eliminated (Table IV, 1. This study confirms the validity of the oxygen chemisorption
Figure 7). method developed earlier2' for counting the active surface vana-
While there are modest changes in reaction selectivity with dium atoms on supported vanadium oxide.
disperson at low conversions, the overall rate of the reaction is 2 . In ethanol oxidation a series of supported catalysts have
not altered by changes in dispersion. Figure 7a shows that for turnover rates and selectivity that do not vary significantly with
the supported samples the magnitude of the overall rate is relatively dispersion, indicating that the reaction is structure insensitive.
invariant with concentration, which is usually considered as in- 3. In ethane oxidation at low conversions overall turnover rates
dicating structure insensitivity. The unsupported 100% V 2 0 5 do not vary, but selectivities change dramatically with vanadium
departs markedly from the supported samples and will be discussed concentration indicating that surface structure affects reactivity.
separately. The rates of production of the various products do 4. For ethane oxidation the supported V,05 samples behave
vary with Concentration. Clearly, C O and C 0 2 production rates substantially different from 100% V20s, in which bulk lattice
are balancing the ethylene and acetaldehyde rates so that the total oxygen appears to participate in the reaction. However, as con-
rate remains constant. These variations are small and disappear centration increases, the supported sample behavior tends to ap-
at higher temperatures (Figure 7b,c). Overall, an interesting proach that of the 100% V205.
reaction behavior is found for ethane oxidation: although variation
in rates are small, changes in selectivity and activation energies Acknowledgment. The experimental work was carried out at
indicate that catalyst structure does have an effect on reactivity. U.C. Berkeley with support from the Director, Office of Energy
All conclusions drawn here are free from effects due to the support, Research, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Materials Sciences
secondary reactions, or transport limitations. Division of the US. Department of Energy, under Contract
This type of chemical behavior has been observed for another DE-AC03-76SF00098. The paper was written at Clarkson
system, propylene oxidation on MOO,. Again in that system, rates University with support from the Director, Division for Chemical
did not change appreciably with surface structure while selectivities and Thermal Systems of the National Science Foundation, under
did. Although some have called the reaction structure sensitive, Grant CTS-890998 1. The authors thank A. M. Carr for assistance
others have called for caution.13 Structure appears to influence with the ethanol oxidation experiments.
the direction the intermediates take among various reactive Registry No. V 2 0 5 , 1314-62-1; EtOH, 64-17-5; CH3CH3,74-84-0;
pathways available, but rates are not affected greatly. 0 2 , 7782-44-7.
I t was noted earlier that 100% V 2 0 , behaves differently from
the supported samples. Its activation energy values are signifi- (26) Oyama, S. T.;Lewis, K. B.; Carr, A. M.; Somorjai, G . A. In Pro-
cantly smaller than those on the supported samples (Table V), ceedings of the 9th International Congress on Catalysis, Calgary, 1988
and hence it has a substantial conversion over a much larger Phillips, M. J., Ternan, M . , Eds.; Chemical Institute of Canada: Ottawa,
1988; Vol. 111, p 1489.
temperature range (Figure 4d). For this reason at most tem- (27) Anderson, J. B. Chem. Eng. Sei. 1963, 18, 147.
peratures its rate is also substantially different from that of the (28) Carberry, J. J. AIChE J . 1961, 7 , 350.

You might also like