Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ABSTRACT
The south sub-Andean zone of Bolivia is characterized by east-verging thrusts, detaching
within Silurian and Devonian series, and associated to a series of north–south to north-north-
east–south-southwest regional anticlines and synclines holding large gas accumulations. This
chapter is a case history of the multi-TCF (trillion cubic feet) Incahuasi discovery and how an
integrated, multidisciplinary approach allows a progressive improvement in the understand-
ing of the trap geometry, reducing the uncertainty during exploration and field appraisal.
While-drilling structural interpretation and biostratigraphic analyses suggested that the
discovery well, prognosed mainly by surface geology and targeting the top of the Huamam-
pampa Formation as a bright discontinuous seismic reflector on a 2-D seismic test line, was
drilling the overturned limb of the surface anticline instead of penetrating the core of the
structure. The top reservoir was found deeper by a side track well.
The appraisal wells all contributed to progressively constrain the complex geometry
of the trap while leaving several possible geometric interpretations of the reservoir structure.
The Huamampampa Formation is repeated and overturned by a series of thrusts that increase
the internal complexity of the field. These results also confirmed that the shales of the Icla
Formation behave as an effective detachment below the reservoir, contributing to the struc-
tural complexity of the field.
A calibrated/constrained inversion of 3-D magnetotelluric acquisition performed over
the structure shows the near-top Huamampampa Formation resistivity anomaly plunging to
the north, which helps to identify the possible structural spills. In map view, the variation of
*Corresponding author
633
orientation provides information on local bends of the target and hence is an important ele-
ment to be considered for optimizing future appraisal wells.
The Incahuasi discovery provided the opportunity to test the validity and efficiency of
many geological and geophysical tools while noting their limitations in a context where only
a few hundred meters of horizontal error can lead to missing the reservoir and trap.
Figure 2. Regional geological cross-sections across the sub-Andean zone (SAZ) (see Figure 1 for location) and
2-D TWT seismic lines from the orogenic front, showing the structural styles characterizing the foreland basin.
The most external (i.e., eastern) and recent structure of 2008). Devonian marine shales of the Los Monos For-
the entire orogenic belt is the Mandeyapecua Thrust mation (Figure 3), although characterized by import-
(Figure 1). Geological cross-sections and seismic lines ant thickness changes, are considered as the primary
(Figure 2) show that, even when the fault geometry and type II-III source rock in the SAZ, with a total organic
related hangingwall folds are very narrow at surface carbon (TOC) generally varying between 0.2 and
and vary between the northern and southern sectors, 2%. Some workers (Moretti et al., 1996; Cruz et al.,
the Mandeyapecua Thrust detaches within Silurian 2001, 2008; Rocha and Cristallini, 2015) show that
shales and gently rises upward, involving the Neogene the shales of the Los Monos Formation are prone to
and the Quaternary sediments of the Chaco Basin in generate gas and condensate from which oil could
the deformation. The deformation of the present-day be generated by retro-condensation processes. None-
foreland basin system is marked by the deposition of theless, secondary cracking has also been proposed
the mainly conglomeratic Oligocene Petaca Formation as an important mechanism controlling the gas gen-
(Figure 3; Sanjines and Jiménez, 1975;Sempere et al., eration (Moretti at al., 1996; Starck, 1999; Cruz et al.,
1990; De Celles and Horton, 2003; Uba et al., 2006). De- 2008; Rocha and Cristallini, 2015). Geochemical anal-
spite the strong and generally continuous contractional yses of the Los Monos Formation were conducted
tectonics affecting the whole SAZ, along with evidence in-house at the regional scale using a large data set.
of growth strata observed in seismic lines within sedi- These studies, based on surface samples, account for
ments belonging to the Chaco Group (Figure 3), Dunn maturity of stratigraphic intervals, which have been
et al. (1995) proposed that two distinct compressional uplifted by thrusting. For this reason, the estimated
pulses occurred along the Mandeyapecua Thrust after maturity has to be considered as referring to a pre-
10 Ma (see also Mugnier et al., 2006; Brooks et al., 2011; trapping stage. These results agree with the burial
Rocha and Cristallini, 2015). history modeling proposed by Dunn et al. (1995)
(Figure 4), suggesting that source rocks entered in
the HC maturity window just before or contempo-
Petroleum System Elements rary to the main Andean compressive event, which
is responsible for the majority of the traps in the SAZ.
Biomarker data prove that HC produced in the whole The interplay between HC generation and overpres-
SAZ consistently correlate with a Paleozoic source sure observed in several wells has been discussed by
(Baby et al., 1995; Moretti et al., 1996; Cruz et al., 2001, Rocha and Cristallini (2015).
Figure 7. a. Schematic cross-sections of the Incahuasi structure, as seen by Lagunillas X-1 and Pincal-1 wells; these shallow
wells provide useful geometrical constraints to assess the attitude of the geological formations in the footwall block of the
Incahuasi thrust. b. Structural model showing the evolution of a break-forward imbricate fault-related fold (modified from
Suppe, 1983). The theoretical model shows similarity with the geometry observed in the field in the central part of the In-
cahuasi structure, where layers of the Carboniferous formations are flat (see Figure 6d). c. Forward modeling showing the
structural evolution (double verging thrusting) and the geometrical relationships between faults and beds, as observed in the
southern sector of Incahuasi. Colors used do not correspond with those used in the lithological column.
(i.e., verticalization) of the earlier east-verging thrust Due to decoupling produced by the detachment
(Figure 7c). of the Los Monos Formation, structural geological
This tectonic style, coupled with the presence of cross-sections, built based on surface geology and on
other potential detachment layers, totally masks the several styles of deformation, were leaving an unac-
presence and the geometry (e.g., vergence, position, ceptably large degree of uncertainty (Figure 8a) on the
displacement) of prospective structures associated to depth and position of the target with respect to the
deep-seated thrusts. For this reason, the interplays surface anticline.
between surface thrusts and faults beneath the Los Prior to drilling, a 2-D seismic test line, close to the
Monos Formation are very difficult to account for: location of the well, was acquired with adapted pa-
the Los Monos Formation decouples the deforma- rameters to better constrain the core of the anticline.
tion, so surface folds and deep structures are com- Several processed versions pre-stack time migration
pletely disconnected and not necessarily in axis. As (PSTM) and pre-stack depth migration (PSDM) of
a consequence, the usual tools for building struc- the 2-D seismic line were used to image the top of the
tural sections cannot be fully applied since the sur- Huamampampa Formation (Figure 8d, e). Although
face i nformation may not represent the deformation the synclines were properly imaged, the seismic res-
below the detachment of the Los Monos Formation. olution within the anticline core remained very poor.
Analog modeling of multidetachment folds ( Driehaus This is due to several factors such as rugged moun-
et al., 2014; Darnault et al., 2016) also indicates that, tainous terrain, very steep dips of the series at the
in some cases, parameters such as sedimentation rate surface, strong velocity variation, and complex wave
and erosion may affect the rise of surface folds with propagation in the subsurface. Based on the inter-
opposite vergence. pretation of these poor-quality data, a possible top
Huamampampa Formation was finally interpreted at
about 1500 m (4921 ft) west from the proposed well
EXPLORATION STRATEGY AND UNCERTAINTIES head (Figures 8d, Figures 9a).
MANAGEMENT A 2-D magnetotelluric (MT) profile, after a con-
strained inversion and with an estimated low
Regional studies were launched internally by Total for resolution of 500 m 3 500 m 11640 ft 3 1640 ft2 , indi-
the whole SAZ to reduce the exploration risk and to cated a top reservoir depth of about 4000-m (13,123-ft)-
manage uncertainties of the different elements of the true Vertical depth sub sea (TVDSS) and located about
petroleum system. The main goal was to better define 500 m (1640 ft) west from the proposed well head
the structural styles of the area, by comparing new (Figure 8b).
internal interpretations with previous work carried A 2-D ground gravimetric survey was also re-
out externally. Geological analogs and stratigraphic corded along the MT line (Figure 8c). Although a
logging were used to investigate the reservoir, seal, possible deep structure could be envisaged, the data
and source rocks while identifying regional variation were dominated by relatively shallow density con-
of their properties, characteristics, and thickness. trasts (there is little density contrast and thus acoustic
contrast below the top of the Los Monos Formation;
see Figure 8c) leading to a strong uncertainty on the
Discovery Well geometry at depth.
Hence, each of the above approaches alone did not
Aside from the uncertainty related to the accurate age provide a conclusive result. For this reason, and in or-
estimation of some sediments and the calibration with der to minimize the error deriving from the use of a sin-
the regional stratigraphy, the geometry of the traps gle approach, the respective uncertainties were merged
and their interplay with surface anticlines is one of the before drilling the ICS-X1 well to get the most satisfac-
main uncertainties for exploration in the SAZ, both at tory solution in terms of drilling and geological risk.
prospect and regional scales. Figure 9a shows the predrill model of the structure
Incahuasi-X1 (ICS-X1) was the first exploration and the well trajectory selected to reach the target. Top
well drilled by Total in 2004 on the Incahuasi struc- of the Huamampampa Formation in the cross-section
ture (Figure 5). Before drilling, several (structural and (Figure 9a) corresponds approximately to the yel-
geophysical) approaches were used to image the deep low dashed line on the seismic line of Figure 8d. The
target and decide the best trajectory to reach the ob- “while-drilling” biostratigraphic survey and image
jective (Figure 8a–c). However, each of these methods log interpretation (Figure 9b) were used to steer the
provided results that, when compared, did not lead to well based on the geometry (i.e., bedding attitude,
a single coherent interpretation (Figure 8a). identification of faults) and constrain the stratigraphic
Figure 8. Types and quantification of uncertainties before drilling ICS-1 discovery well. a. Geological cross-sections, built only based on
surface geology. Based on different models, a vertical and horizontal uncertainty higher than 1 km (0.6 mi) can be envisaged. b. 2-D
magnetotelluric (MT) resistivity section accounting for a top Huamampampa Formation at −3800 m (–12,467 ft) TVDSS located about
500 m (1640 ft) west of ICS-1 well head. c. Gravimetric profile acquired across the structure and distribution, at depth, of the densities
of the main geological bodies. d. 2-D seismic line in time and depth (e) showing how the traps can be poorly imaged by the seismics.
Yellow dashed line in d represents the possible top structure, not visible in depth domain (e), accounting for a structural top located
west from ICS-1 well head.
height (Figure 9b). The use (while-drilling) of bio- as totally representative of the field. It was clear that
markers showed that, although the bedding dip was each future well, although considered as an appraisal
very regular, the well was progressively penetrating well, would have a very important impact on reserves
younger sediments when drilling down further into estimation and could potentially change the under-
the core of the anticline (Figure 9b). In particular, bio- standing of the geometry of the field.
stratigraphic steering of the well showed that it was
drilling an inverted stratigraphic sequence such that
the real geometry of the structure was very different Tools and Approach to De-Risk Field Appraisal
to the one prognosed (Figure 9a, b). A new trajectory
was defined (ICS-X1.ST1) with the objective to tar- The discovery well confirmed the presence of a deep
get the top of the Huamampampa Formation to the structure involving the Huamampampa Formation.
east. The side track well finally found the top of the However, it also showed that the trap geometry is
reservoir on a very steep flank (from 60 to 80°) at a very complex and that the relationship with the sur-
depth of about 5000-m (16,404-ft) measured depth face anticline is not straightforward (e.g., differences
(MD) (Figure 9c). Given these uncertainties, the struc- between the vergence of the surface thrusts versus
ture proposed in Figure 9c could not be considered structure seen at well, length of surface structural
Figure 10. a. Uninterpreted TWT dip line extracted from PSTM cube acquired over Aquio and Ipati blocks. b. Structural inter-
pretation of the same line before the spud of Aquio X-1001 well (see Figure 5 for location).
Figure 11. a. to c. Alternative geological cross-sections showing possible structural models deduced from surface geology
only, before drilling Aquio X-1001 well (red well).
Figure 12. While-drilling geo steering of Aquio X-1001 well and alternative interpretation of the structure based on the inter-
pretation of image log and gamma ray (GR) readings. Two possible structural models can be envisaged (a and b); however, in
both cases, the lower reservoir compartment has been interpreted as a tight anticline with a north-south-oriented axis.
to the overturned panel interpreted in the ICS-X1.ST1 The image logs interpretation also shows that the
well (Figure 9c). The geometrical differences between whole well is characterized by two subvertical frac-
structural compartments in Aquio X1001.G8 and ture systems oriented north–south and east-northeast–
ICS-X1.ST1 wells (compare, for instance, Figures 9, 12) west-southwest (Figure 12).
could be due to a m inor fault displacement, leading to In both alternative structural models, the total depth
a minor westward tilt of the whole anticline. A second (TD) of the well is in shales, which were interpreted, at
possible model (Figure 12b) proposes a simpler, west- that stage, as possibly belonging to the Los Monos For-
verging structure, which appears more consistent with mation (Figure 12), suggesting that the envelope of the
ICS-X1.ST1 interpretation (Figure 9c). Based on the lat- whole structure was entirely p enetrated by the well.
ter model, the Aquio X1001.G8 well should have tested Despite the remaining high uncertainty of many
the highest structural compartment of the trap, and no elements, the Aquio X1001.G8 well confirmed that the
other additional upside could be envisaged. In both target was characterized by several structural com-
cases, the two aforementioned structural hypotheses partments, bounded by thrusts, and that the segment
show that the lower compartment penetrated by the of the structure tested with these two wells was ori-
well corresponds to a tight fold (Figure 12) with a sub- ented north–south.
horizontal north-south-oriented axis. The latter struc-
tural model was retained as the base case due to the ICS-2 Well Following the results of Aquio X1001.G8,
similarity with the structural interpretation following the ICS-2 well was planned about 5 km (3 mi) south
the discovery well. from the discovery well (Figure 5). As per the previous
wells, the PSTM was used to constrain the interpreta- ergence (Figure 14a, b). The possible presence of a
v
tion on both sides of the trap, even though the seismic backthrust rooted within the shales of the Icla Forma-
resolution alone was insufficient to totally de-risk the tion has been proposed as a second model (Figure 14b).
geometry or provide robust elements to decide the Both structural hypotheses reflect the results of the
well trajectory. Therefore, a series of structural geol- well, with several reservoir compartments bounded
ogy analyses were carried out, and several hypotheses by reverse faults. In addition, the analysis of the GR
were proposed before spudding the well (Figure 13). between the central and the lowermost compartments
This well did not require side tracks and encountered (Figure 14c, d, respectively) suggests that the series
a first compartment of the Huamampampa Forma- penetrated close to the well TD is overturned. The
tion at about 4440 m (14,567 ft) MD, before entering comparison between the GR readings (from the central
again in the shales of the Los Monos Formation and compartment) and the reversed section of the GR read-
encountering an additional reservoir compartment ings for about the final 82 m (269 ft) (Figure 14e) shows
at about 4700 m (15,420 ft) MD. The overall struc- a consistent correlation of the main features (GR picks
ture drilled was interpreted as a folded stack of and overall trend). This evidence confirms that the
d ifferent Huamampampa Formation thrust sheets. well, close to its TD, penetrated the Huamampampa
Even though the image log analysis provided some reservoir in an overturned position. Image log inter-
geometrical constraints, various scenarios remained pretation acquired in the well showed several fracture
possible (Figure 14a, b). In particular, two alternative trends, the main one being high-angle fractures oriented
models account for the presence of a central com- east-northeast–west-southwest. Additional secondary
partment characterized by overturned sequences and trends, statistically less representative, are characterized
an overall trap structure with an eastern dominant by low- to high-angle fractures oriented north-north-
east–south-southwest and north–south (Figure 14f).
The ICS-2 well further confirms that the trap is
affected by a series of thrusts, and the highest reservoir
compartment is found about 130 m (427 ft) higher
than the discovery well, suggesting an u pside of the
structure toward the south. In addition, the structural
interpretation of the well also confirms the presence of
a deep inverted panel as hypothesized following the
results of previous wells. Nonetheless, both structural
models proposed for the well (Figure 14) were still
valid, such that geometrical uncertainty concerning
the overall structure remained.
Figure 14. Alternative interpretations of the ICS-2 well, based on dipmeters analysis (a and b). c. The log corresponding to
the intermediate compartment of Huamampampa shows several GR breaks, classical for this geological formation. d. Gamma
ray (GR) log acquired close to the well TD, within an inverted section of reservoir. If mirrored and corrected from well devia-
tion and beds dip, the latest and deepest 82 m (269 ft) of log of (inset e) show a very good correspondence with the trend
of the GR readings acquired in the intermediate reservoir compartment (c). f Lower Hemisphere Schmidth diagram show the
poles and the contour of the fractures interpreted along the well using resistivity image logs.
porosity and fluids (gas versus water) so that the image the Huamampampa Formation. Conversely, the
interpretation of MT data has to be calibrated with constrained inversions of 3-D MT, integrating all avail-
well data and geological information. able geological and structural information, produced
The 2-D MT line previously acquired (Figure 8b) the best image of the subsurface structure. In all cases,
confirmed the capability to resolve, with some con- the MT did not provide a clear and sharp contrast for
straint from the seismic interpretation, deep resistive the top Huamampampa Formation as it does not have
geological structures in this particular geological con- the inherent resolution for such a definition. However,
text due to the resistivity contrast between the Los the “envelope” of the anomaly seen at the level of the
Monos and the Huamampampa Formations. More Iquiri and Huamampampa Formations did roughly
precisely, the Los Monos Formation is relatively match the known structure from the well intersections
conductive (about 30 ohm m), whereas the Huamam- at the larger scale. This provided some hope that, with
pampa Formation is more resistive (about 100 ohm m). an integration of all available data, the extent and the
Other resistivity contrasts occur at shallower levels, closure of the field could be roughly mapped.
mainly between the resistive Iquiri Formation (about Figure 15 shows the MT phase attribute at 3 and
100 ohm m) and the conductive Los Monos Formation. 30 seconds period range expected to be sensitive to
Several methods of inversion were deployed to the target depth. The low phase anomaly at 3 sec-
extract the desired information from the new 3-D MT onds, continuous and roughly oriented north–south,
data. The results demonstrated that u nconstrained indicates a resistive formation in depth, which can be
inversions of 3-D MT (not including an a priori geo- interpreted to represent the Huamampampa Forma-
logical or structural model) were not able to directly tion. In the 30 seconds period attribute, sensitive to
slightly deeper layers than the previous slice, the same measurement scales and by the stronger MT sensitiv-
anomaly is wider in the central part of the survey and ity to conductive media, complicating the recovery of
decreases toward the north, suggesting a structural resistive formations. Nonetheless, given the complex
plunge and/or a change in the petrophysical proper- geology of the Incahuasi structure, the most important
ties of the geological formations. information from the 3-D MT inversion is the global
The refined geological model (down to the top of resistivity variations rather than the true values.
the Los Monos Formation) was used to constrain Given the good match of the deep resistivity anom-
and drive the 3-D MT inversion to obtain a consis- aly with the top of the Huamampampa Formation seen
tent resistivity layering down to the top of the Los at the wells, the shape corresponding to the strongest
Monos Formation. A homogeneous resistivity value of resistivity value anomaly can be tentatively considered
30 ohm m was used for the deeper layers, and then the as a near-top reservoir. The global shape of the anom-
inversion was run to recover the deepest part of the aly top, as seen in section views (Figure 15c), clearly
model, i ncluding the Huamampampa Formation, by does not correspond with the real geometry of the trap.
best fitting the observed data. However, the map view of this anomaly can provide
Although the vertical uncertainty of the MT is elements on the variation of the geometry of the struc-
e stimated at about 500 m (1640 ft) at our depth of ture at depth. In spite of the low vertical resolution of
interest, a relatively good fit, calibrated with the MT methodology, the good correlation of the resistivity
wells already drilled, has been found between the observed with the resistivity expected at reservoir lev-
top of the deep resistive anomaly (15.5 ohm m of els shows that the integration of this technology with
contour in Figure 15c) and the Huamampampa For- the geological model provides useful elements imaging
mation. The low resistivity value of about 25 ohm m the deep structure at the level of the Huamampampa
recovered for the Huamampampa Formation by Formation, where seismic along struggles.
the 3-D MT inversion appears reduced compared
with the well data, where it is estimated to be about ICS-3 Well Based on the analysis of all data and inter-
100 ohm m. This can be explained by the different pretations, the ICS-3 well was drilled about 10 km (6 mi)
Lesnikov et al., 2015), which allowed interpreting Revision of the Structural Model
the top of the Huamampampa F ormation at about
500 m (1640 ft) to the east. A side track (ICS-3.G1) Aquio X1001.G8 and ICS-2 wells found shales close
was planned, which found the top of the Hua- to their TD with an uncertain stratigraphic attri-
mampampa Formation at about 4400 m (14,436 ft) bution at the time of drilling. Their correlation to a
MD and, after crossing a thrust and encountering specific geological formation had a strong impact on
again shales belonging to the Los Monos Formation the chosen structural model. For this reason, a new
(Figure 17d), found again the Huamampampa Forma- and more accurate dating of these deposits was car-
tion at about 4700 m (15,420 ft) MD with a high density ried out. Biostratigraphic data from wells were cal-
of fractures (Figure 17c). Image log interpretation car- ibrated with outcropping stratotypes, showing that
ried out on the side track showed that the uppermost the shales at the bottom of the two wells belong to
reservoir compartment dips west by about 50°, sug- the lower Devonian Salteri Shale Member, identified
gesting that the well encountered the reservoir along as the transition between the Huamampampa and
the western limb of a fold. Based on this interpreta- the Icla Formations. This new interpretation changed
tion and also on the previous wells, it can be assumed drastically the stratigraphic age of the shales and had
that a possible upside of about 200 m (656 ft) could be a strong impact for the interpretation of the Inca-
envisaged eastward from the entry point seen at the huasi structure. A new comprehensive interpretation
well so that the ICS-3.G1 well should have targeted the of the trap geometry, honoring both dipmeter anal-
uppermost structural compartment of the Incahuasi ysis and biostratigraphic interpretation, was neces-
structure, almost on the crest, as in the case of ICS-2. sary (Figure 18a–d). This new model was compared
Figure 18. a. to e. Final and updated geological cross-sections for post discovery well. These sections have been revised (see
zoom in b and d) based on additional biostratigraphic analyses on some shale layers seen close to Aquio X-1001 and ICS-2
wells. These analyses allowed modifying the previous interpretation and getting a consistency between geometry and struc-
tural style all along Incahuasi. Pre-ICS-3 (f) and post-ICS-3 (g) well drilling top Huamampampa depth maps show the impact
of the well results on the comprehension of the whole structure: the side track landed off the main structural compartment of
the Incahuasi. h. 3-D view of the top Huamampampa depth map post ICS-3 well.
with the other possible structural models proposed structure has been integrated into a 3-D model in
and extrapolated to the other wells in order to have a order to have a comprehensive and consistent model
homogeneous structural style for the Incahuasi struc- to be used for future development and resource calcu-
ture (Figure 18a–e). lations (Figure 19).
Based on the reinterpretation of the available well
data, the geological cross-sections allowed to describe
the Incahuasi structure as characterized by three DISCUSSION
main compartments: (1) the uppermost compart-
ment, drilled by all the wells (except ICS-X1.ST-1), The SAZ in Bolivia is a sector where complex topogra-
is characterized by an almost flat structural top; phy and geology complicate both the predrill progno-
(2) the intermediate compartment is characterized ses and the postdrill interpretations.
by a tight anticline with a subhorizontal axial plane Before drilling the first exploration well, several
and a north–south axis; and (3) finally, the lowermost geological and geophysical methods were used to
compartment is characterized by an overturned strati- interpret the deep target and to properly design the
graphic series and bounded by an overturned thrust well trajectory. However, each method used alone
(Figure 18b, d). included a large uncertainty in the interpretation. For
The initial seismic interpretation of the upper- this reason, all of these methods were used together
most reservoir compartment showed a clear bend of in evaluating and weighting the respective uncertain-
the structure, from north–south to north-northeast– ties at the time of proposing the well. Since a conclu-
south-southwest, occurring in correspondence with sive structural and geometrical model could not be
the ICS-3 well head (Figure 18f). Based on the updated built from the available data, the best solution was
understanding of the structure, a new seismic interpre- to consider a multiscenario approach and drill the
tation was completed (Figure 18g, h), allowing a more well while remaining flexible, reactive, and predictive
complete description of the complex structure of the with respect to the ongoing operations, by using bio-
trap. In particular, the structural top of the Incahuasi stratigraphic analyses and image log interpretation to
structure lies between ICS-2 and ICS-3 wells, pro- steer the well.
gressively deepening toward the north (Figure 18g). The main uncertainties for exploration and later
In addition, the orientation of the trap is north–south field appraisal are related to the trap geometry. The
at least until the ICS-3 well, not showing the strong major challenge was to properly image the struc-
bend envisaged by initial interpretation (Figure 18f). ture at depth, completely masked by the strong
This new structural interpretation of the Incahuasi d ecoupling between the upper and lower levels,
likely resulting in a lateral shift of the traps with
respect to the surface anticlines. The strong internal
deformation affecting the Los Monos Formation,
resulting in a strong tectonic thickening, as demon-
strated by several wells, is an additional source of
uncertainty impacting the expected vertical position
(depth) of the target.
The 3-D seismic reprocessing and interpretation
(Figure 18h) provided additional constraints to under-
stand the field geometry. However, even after complet-
ing the discovery well (ICS-X1.ST1) and the first two
exploration/appraisal wells (Aquio-X1001.G8 and ICS-
2), a variety of structural models were still possible for
the structure. Only the third exploration/appraisal well
(ICS-3.G1) provided some key data, which allowed a
better understanding of the structural top, also impact-
ing the estimation of the Gross Rock Volume.
More accurate biostratigraphic analyses provided
an important control point on the shales seen at TD
of Aquio X1001.G8 and ICS-2 wells and allowed a
Figure 19. View of the 3-D geological model, from surface reinterpretation of the wells, helping to build more
to Silurian formations, built in GoCad for the Incahuasi consistency into the general structural model of the
structure. Incahuasi structure (Figure 18). The strong impact that
uncertainties. The application of a multidisciplinary R. Suarez Soruco, and H. J. Welsink, eds., Petroleum
approach, integrating several types of data, allows basins of South America: AAPG Memoir 62, p. 445–458.
reducing geometrical uncertainties during both the Blake, B. A., and D. E. Figueroa, 1999, Interpretation strategy
exploration and the appraisal phases. drives acquisition of 2-D seismic in sub-Andean Bolivia:
The Leading Edge, v. 18, no. 12, p. 1360–1365.
The Incahuasi case study, in the SAZ of Bolivia, pro-
Blake, B. A., D. Figueroa, R. Manceda, and J. Oller, 1999a,
vides an example of how geophysical, structural, and
Turning rays in steep dip areas: Society of Exploration
biostratigraphic interpretation has been used prior to, Geophysicists, Technical Program Expanded Abstracts,
and during, well drilling to improve understanding of p. 1130–1133.
the structural complexity of the reservoir. Blake, B. A., D. Figueroa, and R. Manceda, 1999b, 3D forward
The progressive improvement of the Incahuasi geo- ray trace seismic modeling of strike lines in complex ge-
logical model demonstrates that in fold-and-thrust ology: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Technical
belts, the field appraisal has still an important explora- Program Expanded Abstracts, p. 1871–1874.
tion component and that a strong flexibility is required Brooks, B. A. et al., 2011, Orogenic-wedge deformation and
for a successful development strategy. potential for great earthquakes in the central Andean
A major lesson learnt from the wells drilled in such backarc: Nature Geoscience, v. 4, no. 6, p. 380–383, DOI:
10.1038/NGEO1143.
structurally complex environment is that about 400 m
Cobbold, P. R., 2013, Geological evidence for fluid over-
(1312 ft) of horizontal error in the predrill interpreta-
pressure in mature source rocks within foreland
tion (for over 5000 m [16,404 ft] of drilled section) is basins of the Americas, in AAPG, International Con-
sufficient to completely miss a major geological struc- ference and Exhibition, Cartagena, Colombia, Search
ture representing one of the major gas field discovered and Discovery article #30291, accessed January 26,
in the area. 2018, http://www.searchanddiscovery.com/pdfz/
documents/2013/30291cobbold/ndx_cobbold.pdf.html.
Cruz, C. E., L. Albariño, C. A. Sylwan, and H. J. Villar, 2001,
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Source rocks and hydrocarbons south of the Santa Cruz
Elbow, Bolivia and northwestern Argentina: Denver, CO,
AAPG Annual Convention, 6p.
The authors thank YPFB, Gazprom, and Tecpetrol for Cruz, C. E., J. Oller, J. Veramendi, M. Di Benedetto, M. Pereira,
permission to publish these data. and H. E. Villar, 2008, Los sistemas petroleros devónicos
The comments and the suggestions from two anon- del Subandino Sur y Piedemonte de la Cuenca de Tarija,
ymous reviewers, the editor, Christopher Wibberley, Bolivia: VII Congreso de Exploración y Desarrollo de Hi-
and Anthony Price strongly improved the original drocarburos: Simposio Sistemas Petroleros de la Cuencas
version of the manuscript. Andinas, Mar de la Plata, Argentina, p. 159–187.
The views and conclusions contained in this chap- Darnault, R., J. P. Callot, J. F. Ballard, G. Fraisse, J. M. Men-
ter are solely those of the authors and should not be gus, and J. C. Ringenbach, 2016, Control of syntectonic
interpreted as necessarily representing the views or erosion and sedimentation on kinematic evolution of a
the official policies, either expressed or implied, of multidecollement fold and thrust zone: Analogue mod-
eling of folding in the southern subandean of Bolivia:
Total E&P Bolivia and/or of the Total Group.
Journal of Structural Geology, v. 89, p. 30–43.
De Celles, G., and B. K. Horton, 2003, Implication of early-
middle Tertiary foreland basin development for the
REFERENCES history of Andean crustal shortening in Bolivia: Geologi-
cal Society of America Bulletin, v. 115, p. 58–77.
Baby, P., G. Herail, R. Salinas, and T. Sempere, 1992, Geom- Driehaus, L., T. Nalpas, and J. F. Ballard, 2014, Interaction
etry and kinematic evolution of passive roof duplexes between deformation and sedimentation in a multidecol-
deduced from cross-section balancing: Example from lement thrust zone: Analogue modeling and application
the foreland thrust system of the southern Bolivian sub- to the Sub-Andean thrust belt of Bolivia: Journal of Struc-
Andean zone: Tectonics, v. 11, p. 523–536. tural Geology, v. 65, p. 59–68.
Baby, P., B. Guillier, J. Oller, and G. Montemurro, 1993, Dunn, J. F., K. G. Hartshorn, and P. W. Hartshorn, 1995,
M odele cinematique de la zone Subandine du Coude Structural styles and hydrocarbon potential of the sub-
de Santa Cruz (entre 16°S and 19°S Bolivie). Deduit de Andean thrust belt of southern Bolivia, in A. J. Tankard,
la construction de cartes equilibrees Comptes rendues R. Suarez Soruco, and H. J. Welsink, eds., Petroleum ba-
de l’Academie des sciences. Serie 2, ISSN 0764-4450317, sins of South America: AAPG Memoir 62, p. 523–543.
p. 1477–1483. Echavarría, L., R. Hernández, R. Allmendinger, and
Baby, P., I. Moretti, B. Guillier, R. Limachi, E. Mendez, J. Oller, J. R eynolds, 2003, Subandean thrust and fold belt of
and M. Specht, 1995, Petroleum system of the northern northwestern Argentina: Geometry and timing of the An-
and central Bolivian sub-Andean zone, in A. J. Tankard, dean evolution: AAPG Bulletin, v. 87, no. 6, p. 965–985.
Fugelli, E. M. G., and T. R. Olsen, 2005, Risk assessment and Sheffels, B. M., 1990, Lower bound on the amount of crustal
play fairway analysis in frontier basins: Part 2, examples shortening in the central Bolivian Andes: Geology, v. 18,
from offshore mid Norway: AAPG Bulletin, v. 89, no. 7, p. 812–815.
p. 883–896. Smalley, P. C., S. H. Begg, M. Naylor, S. Johnsen, and
Hackney, R., J. Goodwin, L. Hall, K. Higgins, N. Holzrichter, A. Godi, 2008, Handling risk and uncertainty in petro-
S. Johnston, M. Morse, G. K. Nayak, and P. Petkovic, 2015, leum exploration and asset management: An overview:
Potential-field data in integrated frontier basin geophys- AAPG Bulletin, v. 92, no. 10, p. 1251–1261.
ics: Successes and challenges on Australia’s continental Somoza, R., S. Singer, and B. Coira, 1996, Paleomagnetism
margin: Marine and Petroleum Geology, v. 59, p. 611–637. of upper Miocene ignimbrites at the Puna: An analysis
Lesnikov, V., M. Verliac, J. F. Ballard, and J. M. Fleury, 2015, of vertical-axis rotations in the central Andes: Journal
Use of VSP for improving drilling decisions in the Boliv- of Geophysical Research, v. 101, p. 11387–11400, DOI:
ian foothills: Third EAGE Workshop on Borehole Geo- 10.1029/95JB03467.
physics, Athens, 1 p. Starck, D., 1999, Los sistemas petroleros de la Cuenca de
Maffione, M., F. Speranza, and C. Faccenna, 2009, Bending Tarija: IV Congreso de Exploración and desarrollo de hi-
of the Bolivian orocline and growth of the central Andean drocarburos, Mar de la Plata, Argentina, Actas, p. 63–82.
plateau: Paleomagnetic and structural constraints from Stone, D. S., 2013, Using freehand three-dimensional draw-
the Eastern Cordillera (22–24°S, NW Argentina): Tecton- ings to clarify and verify subsurface structural interpre-
ics, v. 28, p. TC4006, DOI: 10.1029/2008TC002402. tations, in C. Knight and J. Cuzella, eds., Application of
Moretti, I., P. Baby, E. Mendez, and D. Zubieta, 1996, Hydro- structural methods to Rocky Mountain hydrocarbon ex-
carbon generation in relation to thrusting in the SAZ from ploration and development: AAPG Studies in Geology
18 to 22°S, Bolivia: Petroleum Geoscience, v. 2, p. 17–28. 65, p. 1–13.
Mugnier, J. L., D. Becel, D. and D. Granjeon, 2006, Active Suppe, J., 1983, Geometry and kinematics of fault-bend fold-
tectonics in the Subandean belt inferred from the mor- ing: American Journal of Science, v. 283, p. 684–721.
phology of the Rio Pilcomayo (Bolivia), in S. D. Willett, Uba, C. E., C. Heubeck, and C. Hulka, 2006, Evolution of the
N. Hovius, M. T. Brandon, and D. Fisher, eds., Tectonics, late Cenozoic Chaco foreland basin, Southern Bolivia: Ba-
climate, and landscape evolution: Geological Society of sin Research, v. 18, no. 2, p. 145–170.
America Special Paper 398, Penrose Conference Series, Vaamonde, D., 2002, La Formación Los Monos: Su capacidad
p. 353–369. como roca sello: V Congreso de Exploración y Desarrollo
Rocha, E., and E. O. Cristallini, 2015, Controls on structural de Hidrocarburos, Mar del Plata, Argentina, Trabajos
styles along the deformation front of the Subandean zone Técnicos, p. 9.
of southern Bolivia: Journal of Structural Geology, v. 73, Zanella, A., P. R. Cobbold, and C. Le Carlier de Veslud,
p. 83–96. 2014a, Physical modeling of chemical compaction, over-
Roeder, D., 1988, Andean-age structure of the eastern Cordil- pressure development, hydraulic fracturing and thrust
lera (province of La Paz, Bolivia): Tectonics, v. 7, p. 23–39. detachments in organic-rich source rock: Marine and Pe-
Sanjines, G., and F. Jiménez, 1975, Comunicación preliminar troleum Geology, v. 55, p. 262–274.
acerca de la presencia de fósiles vertebrados en la For- Zanella, A., P. R. Cobbold, and L. Rojas, 2014b, Beef veins
mación Petaca del área de Santa Cruz: La Paz, Yacimen- and thrust detachments in Early Cretaceous source rocks,
tos Petroliferos Fiscales Bolivianos: Revista Técnica, v. 4, foothills of the Magallanes-Austral basin, southern Chile
p. 147–156. and Argentina: Structural evidence for fluid overpressure
Sempere, T., G. Herail, J. Oller, and M. G. Bonhomme, 1990, during hydrocarbon maturation: Marine and Petroleum
Late Oligocene-early Miocene major tectonic crisis and Geology, v. 55, p. 250–261.
related basins in Bolivia: Geology, v. 18, p. 946–949.
Sheffels, B. M., 1988, Structural constraints on structural
shortening in the Bolivian Andes, Ph.D. Thesis, Massa-
chusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 167 p.