Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Study of The Convective Drying of Pumpkin Cucurbit
Study of The Convective Drying of Pumpkin Cucurbit
net/publication/251627554
CITATIONS READS
98 1,790
3 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Study about the knowledge and habits regarding food fibres in different countries View project
QCLASSE - Caracterização e Valorização da autenticidade do Queijo Serra da Estrela DOP e sua vocação para a promoção da Saúde View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Raquel Pinho Ferreira Guiné on 11 October 2017.
a b s t r a c t
The main goals of the present work are, on one hand to study the influence of drying operation in some chemical
properties of pumpkin, and, on the other hand, to study the drying kinetics, by applying different kinetics models to
the experimental drying data.
In this way, pumpkin was dried by convection for different air temperatures, ranging between 30 ◦ C and 70 ◦ C. The
chemical properties that were analysed in the fresh and dried pumpkin were: moisture content, total and reducing
sugars, acidity, proteins, lipids, crude fibre and ash.
The results enable concluding that the convective drying at the lowest temperature, 30 ◦ C, induces reductions of
14% in proteins, 65% in total sugars and 36% in fibre. Furthermore, the drying temperature seems to have a negligible
effect on the nutritional characteristics of the pumpkin, since the results for the drying at 30 ◦ C are quite similar to
those for the drying at 70 ◦ C.
With respect to the other subject analysed, the drying kinetics, the results show that the increase on the operating
temperature strongly accelerates the drying process, so that the process at 30 ◦ C takes 8 h while at 70 ◦ C the drying
is finished after only 2 h. The experimental data for moisture ratio was fitted to different models, and the best were
Page and modified Page.
© 2010 The Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
∗
Corresponding author at: Quinta da Alagoa, Estrada de Nelas, Ranhados, 3500-606 Viseu, Portugal. Tel.: +351 232 446600;
fax: +351 232 426536.
E-mail addresses: raquelguine@esav.ipv.pt, raquelguine@gmail.com (R.P.F. Guiné).
Received 12 February 2010; Received in revised form 20 August 2010; Accepted 1 September 2010
0960-3085/$ – see front matter © 2010 The Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.fbp.2010.09.001
Author's personal copy
food and bioproducts processing 8 9 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 422–428 423
Nomenclature
2001):
Table 1 – Kinetic models from literature (Yaldýz and
Ertekýn, 2001; Togrul and Pehlivan, 2003; Lahsasni et al.,
∂W 1
∂ ∂W
∂
∂W
2004). = De r + De r (2)
∂t r ∂r ∂r ∂z ∂z
Model Equation
where De is effective moisture diffusivity, r is the cylinder
Newton MR = exp(−kt)
Page MR = exp(−ktn ) radius, z is the height and t is the time, expressed in seconds.
Modified Page MR = exp(−(kt)n ) Assuming a uniform initial moisture content and a
Henderson and Pabis MR = a exp(−kt) constant effective diffusivity throughout the sample, the ana-
Logarithmic MR = a exp(−kt) + c lytical solution of Eq. (2) is given by:
Wang and Singh MR = 1 + at + bt2
4 ∞
W − We b2 t
the lowest and highest temperatures (30 ◦ C and 70 ◦ C) were = exp −De n2 (3)
W0 − We b2n r
characterized in terms of chemical composition. n=1
E
The data obtained experimentally for the five different tem- De = D0e exp − (5)
Rg (T + 273.15)
peratures studied was plotted in the form of moisture ratio
(MR) versus time, being MR defined as:
where D0e is the diffusivity for an infinite temperature, E is
W − We the activation energy for moisture diffusion, Rg is the gas con-
MR = (1) stant (Rg = 8.31451 J mol−1 K−1 ) and T is the drying temperature
W0 − We
(expressed in ◦ C). A plot of ln(De ) as a function of (1/(T + 273.15))
where W, We and W0 are, respectively, the moisture content at will produce a straight line with slope equal to (−E/R) and inter-
time t, the equilibrium moisture content and the initial mois- cept equal to ln(D0e ), from which the parameters E and D0e can
ture content, all expressed in dry basis (g water/g dry solid). We be estimated.
was considered to be 0.02 g water/g dry solid, and corresponds
to the drying for a very long period when the equilibrium with 3. Results and discussion
the surrounding atmosphere was achieved. The experimen-
tal sets of (MR, t) were fitted using the software Sigma Plot 3.1. Optimization of the Halogen Moisture Analyser
(Version 8.0, SPSS, Inc.) to six different empirical models from
literature, shown in Table 1. To evaluate the quality of each The moisture of the fresh pumpkin was first determined
estimation, the determination coefficient, R, was used. by oven drying until constant weight. The medium value
obtained from three replicates (91.57%, 92.20% and 91.80% (wet
2.5. Estimation of the diffusion coefficients basis)), was 91.86% and was used as the reference for the selec-
tion of the most suitable operating parameters for this food
Fick’s second law equation for non steady-state diffusion, product.
assuming that the samples used can be approximated to cylin- In Table 2 the values obtained for the moisture of the fresh
ders, the diffusion is expressed by (Crank, 1970; Yang et al., pumpkin from the Halogen Moisture Analyser are presented,
Table 2 – Results obtained for the operational calibration of the Halogen Moisture Analyser.
Speed Temperature (◦ C) Moisture content (%) Duration (min:sec)
a
Factor used for the conversion of nitrogen in protein = 6.25.
together with the corresponding operating conditions. From of temperatures studied, the value of the temperature chosen
the results shown is possible to conclude that the operational for the process does not influence significantly the nutritional
conditions that enable to obtain the closest values to the refer- value of the final product.
ence moisture content are: temperature of 105 ◦ C and speed 3 On the other hand, the changes observed by comparing
(showing 91.02%) or temperature 120 ◦ C and speed 3 (showing the fresh with the dehydrated products are somewhat signifi-
91.05%). These two sets of conditions could be used. However, cant for most of the components evaluated. In this way, when
when looking at the time necessary to do the analysis one comparing the fresh product with that dried at 30 ◦ C, one can
quickly realizes that the last enables to obtain the results in perceive that the drying operation induces reductions of 14%
half the time (16 min 40 s) when compared to the first (33 min in proteins, 65% in total sugars and 36% in fibre. The variations
20 s), and this is a very important factor when the quantity observed in the lipids contents are not significant, since this
of samples to analyse is high, such as in the case of monitor- product is very poor in this component. These results reveal
ing the drying kinetics. Therefore, every analysis made for the that the heat provided during the drying process originates
kinetic study was done with the Halogen Moisture Analyser the degradation of sugars in a very important extension and
set to 120 ◦ C and speed 3. causes some protein denaturising.
When these results are compared with those obtained by
Ambrósio et al. (2006), for pumpkin (C. maxima and Cucurbita
3.2. Chemical composition moschata) dehydrated in a drum drier (shown in Table 4) is
possible to see that in the present case the dehydrated sam-
Table 3 shows the chemical composition of fresh pumpkin, ples have comparable lipids contents, higher protein and ash
either analysed or from references in the literature, for com- contents, but less fibre.
parison purposes. It can be seen that in general terms the
results obtained in the present study are in accordance with
the values referred in the literature, being within the intervals 3.3. Empirical kinetic models
specified. However, with respect to acidity there are important
differences, being the pumpkin analysed much less acid. Fig. 2 illustrates the dry basis moisture content of pumpkin
In Table 4 the chemical composition of the pumpkins, fresh cylinders during the convective air drying at the different tem-
and dehydrated at the lowest and highest temperatures, are peratures studied. The batch drying curves obtained for the
shown to evaluate the effect of drying temperature on the temperatures of 30 ◦ C, 40 ◦ C, 50 ◦ C, 60 ◦ C and 70 ◦ C reveal a
nutritional value of pumpkin. The values are expressed in similar kinetic behaviour, not showing a constant drying rate
grams per 100 g of dry mass for a better comparison of the period, as previously observed by Arévalo-Pinedo and Murr
fresh to the dried products. From the values is possible to see (2006) for the vacuum drying of pumpkin and by Doymaz (2007)
that the chemical compositions of both dehydrated pumpkins for the forced convective air drying of pumpkin. On the other
(at 30 ◦ C and 70 ◦ C) are very similar, meaning that for the range hand, the curves evidence a decreasing stabilization time as
Table 4 – Chemical composition of the fresh and dehydrated pumpkin (expressed as a percentage of the dry mass).
Component Fresh product Dehydrated at 30 ◦ C Dehydrated at 70 ◦ C Dehydrated in drum drier
(Ambrósio et al., 2006)
a
Factor used for the conversion of nitrogen in protein = 6.25.
Author's personal copy
426 food and bioproducts processing 8 9 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 422–428
12 1.2
Experimental points
10 30ºC 1.0 Newton
(kg water / kg dry solids)
40ºC Page
50ºC Modified Page
Moisture content
Moisture ratio, MR
8 60ºC Henderson & Pabis
70ºC
0.8 Logarithmic
Wang & Singh
6
0.6
4
0.4
2
0.2
0
0 2 4 6 8 10
0.0
Drying time (h) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Drying time (h)
Fig. 2 – Batch drying curves for pumpkin at different
temperatures. Fig. 3 – Fitting of the experimental data at 30 ◦ C with the
different models tested.
the temperature is raised. In fact, the samples took 8.0, 5.5,
4.0, 3.5 and 2.0 h, for the temperatures varying from 30 ◦ C to acterizes each fitting. From the results obtained it was possible
70 ◦ C, and reached a final moisture content of 3.5%, 4.6%, 4.1%, to conclude that the best models for the case at study are the
3.2% and 2.7% (wet basis), respectively. As expected, there is Page and Modified Page, with R2 ranging between 0.9519 and
an acceleration of the drying process due to the increase in the 0.9984. On the other hand, the worst model is Wang and Singh,
temperature of the drying air from 30 ◦ C to 70 ◦ C. Moreover, the with R2 varying from 0.8775 to 0.9704. This can also be con-
higher percentage of weight loss occurs in the early stages of firmed in Fig. 3, where the Wang and Singh fitting is clearly
drying, so that in the first 30 min the loss of moisture content distinguished from the other fittings. In fact, the second order
increases from about 40% to 62% when the temperature rises polynomial proved to be less adequate to describe the kinetic
from 30 ◦ C to 70 ◦ C. The effect of temperature on the drying data obtained for the drying of pumpkin. One other observa-
kinetic of pumpkin is consistent with others results published tion that can be made from Table 5 is that for all the models
in the literature to the same product dried at temperatures that proved to be relatively good (i.e., all except the Wang
ranging between 65 ◦ C and 75 ◦ C (Krokida et al., 2003). and Singh) the drying constant (k) increased quite significantly
The drying kinetics data obtained for the five tempera- with the increase in temperature, and this is true for the entire
tures studied, in the form of moisture ratio versus time, was range of temperatures tested. As a result of the important
fitted to six different kinetic models commonly cited in the effect of temperature on the drying process this parameter
literature, shown in Table 1. The results of such fittings are triplicates when the temperature is raised from 30 ◦ C to 70 ◦ C.
presented for each model in Table 5, which shows the values Considering that Page is one of the best models applica-
of the estimated parameters with the corresponding standard ble to the drying of pumpkin, the experimental values of the
deviation, as well as the determination coefficient which char- moisture ratio for the different temperatures as well as the
Newton
k (±sd) 0.4979 (±0.0303) 0.6824 (±0.0427) 0.9494 (±0.0981) 1.3922 (±0.0648) 1.9867 (±0.0725)
R2 0.9505 0.9737 0.9513 0.9936 0.9981
Page
k (±sd) 0.6281 (±0.0474) 0.6508 (±0.0609) 0.9689 (±0.1173) 1.3929 (±0.0627) 1.9493 (±0.0904)
n (±sd) 0.7812 (±0.0646) 1.0714 (±0.1141) 0.9497 (±0.1843) 0.9207 (±0.0815) 0.9390 (±0.0852)
R2 0.9730 0.9747 0.9519 0.9945 0.9984
Modified Page
k (±sd) 0.5515 (±0.0358) 0.6697 (±0.0432) 0.9669 (±0.1208) 1.4332 (±0.0826) 2.0358 (±0.1104)
n (±sd) 0.7811 (±0.0645) 1.0716 (±0.1140) 0.9485 (±0.1854) 0.9206 (±0.0815) 0.9389 (±0.0853)
R2 0.9730 0.9747 0.9519 0.9945 0.9984
Henderson and Pabis
k (±sd) 0.4567 (±0.0347) 0.6784 (±0.0548) 0.9261 (±0.1225) 1.3794 (±0.0772) 1.9827 (±0.0890)
a (±sd) 0.9056 (±0.0416) 0.9937 (±0.0476) 0.9730 (±0.0728) 0.9895 (±0.0286) 0.9974 (±0.0203)
R2 0.9661 0.9737 0.9523 0.9937 0.9981
Logarithmic
k (±sd) 0.4330 (±0.0634) 0.5564 (±0.0786) 0.7637 (±0.1945) 1.3388 (±0.1192) 1.9513 (±0.1768)
a (±sd) 0.9135 (±0.0474) 1.0441 (±0.0514) 1.0250 (±0.0944) 0.9967 (±0.0349) 1.0022 (±0.332)
c (±sd) −0.0153 (±0.0376) −0.0725 (±0.0466) −0.0698 (±0.0845) −0.0094 (±0.0215) −0.0053 (±0.0249)
R2 0.9665 0.9806 0.9581 0.9939 0.9981
Wang and Singh
a (±sd) −0.3249 (±0.0222) −0.4567 (±0.0225) −0.6258 (±0.0502) −0.8103 (±0.0620) −1.2624 (±0.1222)
b (±sd) 0.0263 (±0.0034) 0.0514 (±0.0051) 0.0960 (±0.0153) 0.1555 (±0.0215) 0.3909 (±0.0711)
R2 0.8775 0.9665 0.9398 0.9410 0.9704
Author's personal copy
food and bioproducts processing 8 9 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 422–428 427
0.8 60ºC for moisture diffusion, E, was found to be 33.74 kJ/mol. This
70ºC
latter value is lower when compared to the value reported
0.6 by Doymaz (2007), 78.93 kJ/mol, for the forced convective air
drying of pumpkin. This difference can be attributed to the
0.4
varieties used: C. maxima in the present study and Cucurbita
pepo L. in the work of Doymaz (2007).
0.2
4. Conclusions
0.0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 From the chemical analyses made was possible to conclude
Drying time (h) that drying induces important reductions in total sugars, fibres
and proteins, when the products dehydrated at 30 ◦ C or 70 ◦ C
Fig. 4 – Fitting of the experimental data at all temperatures
are compared to the fresh pumpkin.
with the Page model.
As to the influence of the drying temperature on the pro-
cess, it was observed that increasing the drying temperature
predictions obtained to each case using this model are illus-
from 30 ◦ C to 70 ◦ C leads to a diminishing of 75% in the drying
trated in Fig. 4. As it can be seen the Page model proved to
time. The results obtained from fitting the experimental data
give good fits for the different drying temperatures, along the
to the empirical kinetic models tested allowed to conclude
entire drying periods (varying from 2 to 8 h). However, at the
that the models that best describe the dehydration kinetics
final stages the model tends to give higher predictions than
for pumpkin in the range of temperatures from 30 ◦ C to 70 ◦ C
the values observed experimentally. In this way, models such
are Page and Modified Page.
as Newton, Henderson and Pabis or Logarithmic, show a bet-
For the drying process modelled in terms of Fick’s diffu-
ter adjustment at the final stages of drying (see Fig. 3), despite
sion law, the values obtained for the diffusion coefficient at
showing an overall fitting slightly less good, having in mind
an infinite temperature, D0e , and activation energy for moisture
the lower values of R2 (see Table 5).
diffusion, E, were, respectively, 0.028 m2 /s and 33.74 kJ/mol.
Senser, F., Scherz, H., 1999. Tablas de composición de alimentos, Yaldýz, O., Ertekýn, C., 2001. Thin layer solar drying of some
2nd ed. Editorial Acribia, Zaragoza. vegetables. Drying Technology 19, 583–597.
Togrul, I., Pehlivan, D., 2003. Modelling of drying kinetics of single Yang, H., Sakai, N., Watanabe, M., 2001. Drying model with
apricot. Journal of Food Engineering 58, 23–32. non-isotropic shrinkage deformation undergoing
Vega, A., Fito, P., Andrés, A., Lemus, R., 2007. Mathematical simultaneous heat and mass transfer. Drying Technology 19,
modeling of hot-air drying kinetics of red bell pepper (var. 1441–1460.
Lamuyo). Journal of Food Engineering 79, 1460–1466.