Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 Material Balance
4.1.1 Introduction
Material quantities as they pass through processing operations can be described by material
balances. Material balances are the basis of process design. A material balance taken over the
complete process will determine the quantities of raw materials required and products
produced. Balances over individual process units set the process stream flows and
compositions. Such balances are statements on the conservation of mass. Similarly, energy
quantities can be described by energy balances, which are statements on the conservation of
energy. If there is no accumulation, what goes into a process must come out. It is true for
continuous operation over any chosen time interval.
Material balances are fundamental to the control of processing, particularly in the control of
yields of the products. The increasing cost of energy has caused the industries to examine
means of reducing energy consumption in processing. Energy balances are used in the
examination of the various stages of a process, over the whole process and even extending over
the total production system from the raw material to the finished product.
The general conservation equation for any process system can be written as:
Material out = Material in + Generation - Consumption – Accumulation
For a steady-state process the accumulation term will be zero. If there is no chemical reaction
the steady-state balance reduces:
Material out = Material in
Time basis might be chosen as a basis for calculation when results are to be presented in tone/y
[1].
4.2. Annual production schedule:
𝑑𝑟𝑦 𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 (𝑡𝑜𝑛) 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
= (1 − 𝑢𝑚𝑖𝑑𝑖𝑡𝑦)
𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟
𝑑𝑟𝑦 𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 (𝑡𝑜𝑛) 𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑠𝑡 𝑑𝑟𝑦 𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑡𝑒𝑟
(%) =
𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑠𝑡 𝑑𝑟𝑦 𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑡𝑒𝑟
𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑐𝑒𝑠 𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑐𝑒𝑠
= 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑠𝑡 𝑑𝑟𝑦 𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑓𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 ×
𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟
𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑠𝑡 𝑑𝑟𝑦 𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟
𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑐𝑒𝑠
𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛(𝑘𝑔) 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟
𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑐 (1 − 𝑙𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑠)
After making the calculations, we obtain the following results (Table 5).
Table 5 - Annual production schedule
annual dry
matter
annual production
production
production per matches
yeast type number of
(ton/year) __________
matches (ton)
(ton/year) %
(matches/year)
(g/mol)
Element
____________ ____________ ____________ ____________
A PM B=A/PM D=B/B(Carbon)
ashes 7.5 - - -
TOTAL 100.0 - - -
The ashes are made up of several mineral salts, each representing, per se,
a negligible portion in the establishment of the stoichiometric equation.
Although cell growth encompasses many chemical reactions, the end result can be
be represented by a single equation, which involves only the most metabolism products
representative. This always includes the cell formula (Table 6, column D), depending on
the other terms of the available nutrients and energy sources. The general form (for
any microorganism) from the aerobic growth equation (Equation 3), using the
ammonia as a nitrogen source, is:
OO2 + CHHSOOSNNS + aNH3 → YbCHhbOobNnb + ƩYpiCHhpiOopi + wH2O + cCO2 (Equation 3)
o, a, Yb, Ypi, w and c are the stoichiometric coefficients for O2, NH3, biomass, the ith
metabolic product, H2O and CO2, respectively. The indices s, b and pi refer to the
substrate, biomass i th product, respectively.[27]
In the specific case of FFC yeast, Ypi can be considered null, i.e., there is noformation of
products in quantities that justify being considered in these calculations.
All the others are different from zero, but yet unknown. To determine them it is necessary to
bear in mind the following points:
i) Composition of molasses
The composition of molasses allowed is shown in Table 7.
The quantity of fermentable (reducible) sugars is counted in terms of the mass of
sugars, which is obtained after its inversion by the invertase enzyme (secreted by the
yeast).
Table 7 – Molasses composition [23]
Thiamine(μg/g) 1-4 -
pyrodixin(μg/g) 2.3-5.6 -
riboflavin(μg/g) 0-0.75 -
This type of reaction is necessary due to the fact that molasses are made up ofdifferenttypes of
sugars, which have different degrees of assimilation by cells: [22]
Simple sugars: they are monosaccharides, such as fructose, glucose and maltose. They are
isomers of chemical formula C6H12O6 and are directly assimilable.
-More complex sugars (eg sucrose and raffinose), are not directly assimilable by the cells. They
must first be hydrolyzed to monosaccharides outside the cell by the action of the invertase
enzyme.
-Very complex sugars: they are not hydrolyzable by invertase, they are very difficult assimilated.
It should be noted that the production of invertase by Sacharomyces cerevisiae is so fast that
simple and complex sugars are assimilated with the same speed.Another aspect to be taken
into account is that this type of reaction consumes water molecules. ThusTherefore, it cannot
be accounted for due to the lack of knowledge of the composition of theMolasses in each of the
various types of fermentable sugars that make them up.
Bearing in mind the considerations mentioned above, it is immediate that the formulamost
correct chemistry to use for the substrate in Equation 3 of the cells is C6H12O6.
ii) Yield of biological reaction
Different definitions for the yield of the reaction are found in the literature, depending on the
emphasis that one wishes to place on a given product involved in the production of biomassAnd
/ or biomass status (wet or dry basis). In this work one of the most cited isused:[25]
biomass produced
η =
sugar mass(C6H12O6 Conumed)
* this factor was determined from Table 6, adding the elements of column D after
themultiplication by the respective molecular weight (PM) and adding the masscorresponding
to the ashes (Table 8)[27]
Table 8 - Calculation of the molecular weight of biomass
Carbon 12 1 12
Total - - 24.13
Bearing in mind that the fixed income is based on experimental resultspublished and not in
theoretical considerations (since only in these can we speak of a formulachemistry for biomass
with a molecular weight easily calculated from it), in thethe determination of biomass has to
take into account the 7.5% of ash that constitute it.
Therefore, we have:
24.13𝑔 𝑏𝑖𝑜𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠 100% 26.09𝑔 𝑏𝑖𝑜𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠
× =
𝑚𝑜𝑙 𝑏𝑖𝑜𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠 92.5% 𝑚𝑜𝑙 𝑏𝑖𝑜𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠
There are different criteria that could be adopted, based on the compositions of themolasses,
to determine the fraction of sugarcane molasses in the stream. In this work we chosefor taking
vitamin biotin as a determining component, which, as already mentioned,assumes a
fundamental role in the cell phone. Thus, bearing in mind the following points:
Composition of molasses in biotin and sugar (Table 7)
Yeast composition in biotin equal to 1.6 μg/g [22]
Yield of biological reaction, η = 0.5
Therefore, we proceed to calculate:
Biotin present in molasses = b
b = biotin that the cell needs× η
1.6 × 10−6 𝑘𝑔 𝑏𝑖𝑜𝑡𝑖𝑛 0.5 𝑘𝑔 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑠𝑡
𝑏= ×
𝑘𝑔 𝑏𝑒𝑒𝑡 𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑘𝑔 𝑠𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑟
Bearing in mind that in this process there is an octuplication of yeast mass (multiplication of
biomass equal to 8), as previously mentioned, we have toinitial mass of the stage (inoculum) is
1/8 of the final mass:
30660
𝑖𝑛𝑜𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑢𝑚 𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠 = = 3833𝑘𝑔
8
Therefore, the amount of dry yeast that is produced will be: dry yeast
30.66𝑡𝑜𝑛 − 3.833𝑡𝑜𝑛 = 26.827 𝑡𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝑑𝑟𝑦 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑠𝑡
Bearing in mind the definition of income, and assuming the value of the same 0.5, as already
was mentioned earlier:
26.827𝑡𝑜𝑛 26.827
𝑟𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑑 𝑠𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑟 𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠 = = = 53.654𝑡𝑜𝑛
η 0.5
Since, what is produced in the previous stage is the inoculums of the next one, and that the
multiplication and yeast concentration at the end are the same in all stages, can identical
calculations must be carried out for the stages upstream of the 3rd (results compiled in Table
11).
In the laboratory phase, only the third stage consumes significant molasses. At this stage, the
give factor and the yeast concentration at the end are the same in all stages, the calculations to
be carried out and the biomass multiplication is 950 [25] and the yield, as mentioned
previously, it is 0.36. The method of calculating the quantity of sugar needed for this step is the
same as that performed for the 3rd stage of the laboratory phase (see Table 11).
Table 11 - Sugar requirements for the different stages of the process
Total - - - 61319.268
The total amount of molasses that is needed is calculated on the basis of its sugar content:
𝑛𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑟𝑦 𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑟
𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠 =
𝑠𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑟 𝑓𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑠
Swing to molasses filter: in this operation, remove the solids that the molasses contains, and
dilute it sufficiently so that can be handled and transported.
Since it is a continuous operation, the calculations are made considering 1 hour of operation as
the basis for calculation.
The flow rate of the molasses inlet current is calculated as follows:
𝑘𝑔
𝑛𝑒𝑒𝑑 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑠(𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑐
)
𝑡𝑒 𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑙𝑒𝑡 𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡 = 𝑜𝑢𝑟
𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑐(𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑐
)
According to the values indicated in Table 7 and Table 10, and taking into account thecontent of
solid (insoluble) impurities [22] in molasses, it is possible to fix its composition ininert (soluble
impurities).
Table 12 - Composition of beet molasses
The current that flows from the filter to the molasses tank M2 contains:
Total amount of impurities-impurities that come out of the filter = Amount of impurities that
follow in M2
Bearing in mind that, as previously mentioned, the current ES1 is constituted by solid impurities
with 5% humidity, the flow of this current can be calculated:
𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑢𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑒𝑠 𝑡𝑎𝑡 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑒 𝑜𝑢𝑡 𝑖𝑛 𝐸𝑆𝐶
𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝐸𝑆𝐶 =
(1 − 0.05)
With the exception of the flow of solid impurities and water, all partial flow rates of thecurrent
M2 are the same as current M1 (Table 1).It is assumed that a 5% dilution of molasses is
sufficient, the total flow rate of the molasses is calculatedcurrent M2, FM2:
𝐹𝑀2𝑖
𝐹𝑀3 =
(1 − 𝑋𝑀2𝑖
Being:
𝐹𝑀2𝑖 - Flow rate of component i in current M2
𝑋𝑀2𝑎 - Water fraction in stream M2
The water flow, FM2i, is from: 𝐹𝑀𝑠𝑎 = 𝐹𝑀2 × 𝑋𝑀3𝑎 ,being the composition of the current
𝐹𝑀 2𝑖
M2: 𝑋𝑀2𝑖 = , 𝑋𝑀2𝑖 being the fraction of component i in the current M2.
𝐹𝑀2
The water flow of the AP1 stream, FAP1, is determined by making a balance to the water:
𝐹𝐴𝑃 1 = 𝐹𝑀 3𝑎 + 𝐹𝐸𝑆𝐶
Balance to molasses sterilizer:
The function of the sterilizer at this stage is to eliminate the microorganisms that are in
themolasses chain.In this operation, the objective of diluting sugar to 40% [22] (mass) is also
achieved. The objective of this operation is to prepare the culture medium, both in terms of
composition andtemperature (303.15 K), to be used in the propagation section.
This operation is carried out quickly, assuming that there are no sugar losses due
tocaramelization. [2]
The calculation base is 1 hour.
The AP2 stream is made up of water only, so the partial flows of the M3 and
M4 are the same, except for water.
𝐹𝑀4𝑎𝑐
Current flow M4, FM4, is calculated by: 𝐹𝑀4 = , FM4ac being the flow of fermentable
𝑋 𝐹𝑀 4
sugars in chain M4, FM4ac the fraction of fermentable sugars in chainM4.
The water flow in the M4 stream is necessary to complete FM4.
The composition of the M4 current is obtained by the quotient between partial and total flows.
The flow rate of current AP2, FAP2, is then calculated by making an overall water balance:
𝐹 𝐴𝑃2 = 𝐹𝑀4𝑎𝑔 − 𝐹𝑀3𝑎𝑔 , with 𝐹𝑀4𝑎𝑔 being the water flow in stream 4, and FM3ag being the
water flowin chain 3.
Table 3 compares the values of flow rates and current compositions in the
sterilizer.
Assuming that this current consists only of ammonia and water, 75% of the current will be
water. So, the water flow is calculated will be the difference between the total flow and the
water flow ammonia.
Air inlet current (AR3)
The oxygen requirements for yeast are calculated, for each stage, from thestoichiometric mass
ratio that is in Table 9.
𝑀𝐹3 × 𝑀𝑂𝐸
𝑁𝑂3 =
𝑀𝐹𝐸
NO3 being the need for oxygen (ton) and MOE the stoichiometric oxygen mass (23.44 g / mol
CO0.52N0.16H1.55).
Since, in the dimensioning of fermenters, the percentage ofoxygen absorbed by the yeast in the
fermentation medium is different at each stage and isequal to:
- 12.5% in the first stage
- 31% in the second stage
- 69% in the third stage
Although the oxygen concentration in the fermentation medium is not constant (transient), in a
start all the oxygen that is absorbed is consumed. Therefore, the flow of this, FAR3, is given by:
03
𝐹𝐴𝑅3𝑜 =
0.69
The air flow is calculated, taking into account a composition of 21% in oxygen, and the
remaining 79% nitrogen.
𝐹𝐴𝑅3𝑂
𝐹𝐴𝑅 =
0.21
Since the nitrogen flow in the AR3 stream, FAR3N is: 𝐹𝐴𝑅3𝑁 = 0.79𝐹𝐴𝑅3
Phosphorus current (HP3)
The phosphorus that yeast needs is satisfied by and by the phosphoric acid that it also helps to
maintain the desired pH.
The calculations are made based on P2O5, as it is in the form of this oxide that phosphorus
concentrations in molasses and yeast are tabulated.
𝑁𝑃𝐿 = 𝐹𝑃𝐿 × 𝑀𝐹3 (Equation 10)
𝐹𝑀
8𝑎𝑐
𝑀𝑃 = 𝐹𝑃𝑀 × ( 𝑓𝑎𝑚 ) + 𝐵𝑅𝐸𝐴𝐷 (Equation 11)
Being:
NPL = Need for phosphorus in yeast
FPL = Fraction of phosphorus in yeast
MP = Total mass of phosphorus to be supplied
FPM = fraction of phosphorus in molasses
fam = sugar fraction in molasses
PO = amount of phosphorus (in P2O5) that needs to be added
Equating equations 10 and 11, the value of PO is removed, which is converted to acid
phosphoric:
𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑜𝑓 𝑏𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑑 × 2 × 𝑃𝑀 𝐻3𝑃𝑂4
𝐻𝑃3𝑃 =
𝑃𝑀 𝑃2𝑂5
To avoid large pH gradients inside the fermenters, phosphoric acid isadded diluted to 5%.
Therefore, and in a similar way to the calculation made for theammonia, the flow rates, total
and water in the PH3 stream are calculated.
The results are shown in Table 4.
Sulphuric acid stream (HS3)
PH control is important to avoid contamination, however, it is important thatdo not go down to
values that inhibit optimal growth. The optimum value is in the 4.5 rangeto 6.5 [23], assuming a
pH value of 5. This control is done by addingsulphuric acid.
The compounds that most influence pH are ammonia and phosphoric and sulphuric acids.
In this balance, it is considered that acids and bases completely dissociate: theammonia and
phosphoric acid, because the cells consume nitrogen and phosphorus,respectively, shifting the
balance towards dissociation; sulphuric acid,because their dissociation constants arehigh. [34]
𝐹𝐿2𝑙 = 𝑒𝑓 × 𝐹𝐿1𝑙
𝐹𝐸𝐿2𝑓 = (1 − 𝑒𝑓) × 𝐹𝐿1𝑙
Being:
FL2l - yeast flow in L2 stream
FEL2l - yeast flow in the EL2 stream
ef - centrifuge efficiency (0.975)
FL1l - yeast flow in stream L1
The calculation of the current L2, FL2, is done through the flow rate of the yeast current and
composition in the aforementioned stream:
𝐹𝐿
𝐹𝐿2 = 𝑋 2𝑙 , 𝑋𝐿2𝑙 being the yeast fraction in stream L2
𝐿2𝑙
The flow rate of solid impurities in this stream is equal to the flow rate of impurities in the
streamL1.
The numerical value of the flow rate AP, as already mentioned, is equal to the flow rate of the
current L2.
There is still a need to calculate the flow rates for water and aggregates in both streams.
Therefore, the ratio between them is constant:
𝑀𝑇𝐴𝐸 (𝐹𝐿1𝑎 + 𝐹𝐴1 )
=
𝑀𝑇𝐼𝐸 𝐹𝐿1𝑖
Being:
MTAE - total body of water entering this unit
MTIE - total mass of aggregates entering this unit
FL1a - water flow in stream L1
FL1i - inert flow in L1 current
AND,
𝑀𝑇𝐴𝐸 𝐹𝐿2𝑎
=
𝑀𝑇𝐼𝐸 𝐹𝐿2𝑖
Being:
FL2a - water flow of L2 stream
FL2i - L2 current inert flow
And, making a balance to the current L2, we have:
At the end of this operation, the yeast has practically the composition of the finished
product,only the additive mixture is missing, which constitute 0.15% of the final mass [23].
The composition of the current L4, χL4l, in yeast, is thus determined, taking into account the
final composition and the fraction of additives to be added:
𝑋𝐹𝐵
𝑋𝐿4𝑙 =
(1 − 𝑓𝑎)
Being:
𝜒𝐹𝐵 - yeast composition in yeast bar (finished product)
fraction of additives in baking powder (finished product)
Since the flow rate and the yeast fraction in the L4 current are known, it is possible to calculate
the total flow of current L4, FL4:
𝐹𝐿4𝑙
𝐹𝐿4 =
𝑋𝐿4𝑙
This flow rate is the same as the current AP7, as we admitted at the beginning.
The calculation of the flow of aggregates and water, in both outlet streams is carried out from
the same way as that performed in the centrifuge. The results are compiled in the Table 8.
Swing to mixer (unit M)
It is in this unit that the additives are mixed in the yeast, being subsequently
homogenized.
The composition of additives in yeast bars, as already mentioned, is 0.15% [23].
Calculation basis is 1 hour.
The flow rates that make up the L5 current are the same as those of the L4 current, with the
exception of the additions.
The total flow of current L5, FL5, is then determined by:
(𝐹𝐿5𝑙 + 𝐹𝐿5𝑎 + 𝐹𝐿5𝑖 + 𝐹𝐿5𝑖𝑠)
𝐹𝐿5 =
(1 − 𝑓𝑎𝑑)
Being:
FL5l - yeast flow in L5 stream
FL5a - water flow in L5 stream
FL5i - inert flow in L5 current
FL5is - flow of solid impurities in L5 stream
fad - fraction of additives in the final yeast bar
The flow rates of additives in the AD and L5 currents are calculated as follows: FL5 x% of
additions.
The composition of the chain is determined by the same methodology already used for other
currents in previous units. The results are grouped in Table 9.
5. Energy Balances
5.1. Introduction to energy balances [26]
In the process design, energy balances are made to determine the requirements for
process energy: the necessary heating, cooling and motive power. At the
operation of a factory, an energy balance will show the pattern of utilization of the
and will suggest areas for conservation and savings.
The general energy conservation equation is given by:
∆E = -∆ (U + pV + K + P) + Q + w
Where of the first member means the difference between the final state and the initial state
(inters) and the of the second term means the difference (or balance) between the
contributions from all outgoing streams and contributions from all streams entrance. K
represents kinetic energy, P represents potential energy, U represents internal energy, Q
represents heat and W represents work.
What is despised:
The potential energy (∆P), since the difference in elevation between the input currents
and output is negligible;
The kinetic energy (∆K), because the speed of entry and exit of the currents is
approximately equal;
The work (W), because the work done by the system is very small;
Therefore,∆E = -∆U + Q, and in steady state: ∆H = Q
5.4.2. Balances at the 1st and 2nd stages of propagation (units F1 andF2)
In these stages the calculations are made similar to those made for the 3rd stage.
Tables 14 and Table 15 summarize the values obtained for these two fermenters.