Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This chapter will discuss more specifically about movie, speech act, kinds
of speech act, forms of directive speech act, functions of directive speech act,
factor of communication, and previous study.
2.1 Movie
Movie definitely has theme, plot, characters, setting, and other story
elements. There were many utterances that can be found in the movie. Besides as
an entertainment, through movie, we can find out how language is used to
produce meaning. Generally, the characters in the movie have some interactions
and during that interaction, they communicate and use language as their means of
communication.
The Finest Hours Movie can be classified as a drama-historical movie,
directed by Craig Gillespie and produced by Walt Disney Pictures. The
screenplay, written by Eric Johnson, Scott Silver, and Paul Tamasy, This movie is
a true story of the U.S.Coast Guard's Most Daring Sea Rescue by Michael J.
Tougias and Casey Sherman. The Finest Hours was directed by Craig Gillespie
and starred Bernard Webber who as a crewman at the Coast Guard station in
Chatham, Massachusetts, on Cape Cod, has fallen in love with a local girl, Miriam
Pentinen.
Speech act is the basic unit of communication, taken together, with the
principle of impressibility, suggest that there are a series of analytic connection
between the notion of speech acts, what the speaker means, what the sentence
uttered means, what the speaker intends, what the hearer understands, what the
rules governing the linguistic element.
Levinson (1983:243) states that all utterances not only serve to express
propositions, but also perform actions and of the many ways in which one could
say that in uttering some linguistic expression a speaker was doing something,
there is one privileged level of action that can be called the illocutionary act - or,
more simply, the speech act. All definitions given above emphasize that speech
act is the phenomenon of language from functional perspective. In the sense, the
utterance that one produces is not merely an utterance. It serves particular function
and contains the intents of the speaker and can give effect on the hearer or
addressee.
1. Locutionary Acts
In this case, the speaker wants to give (a certain meaning) information to the
hearer that it’s raining heavily. The speaker also has purpose order to make the
hearer understand what the speaker say and do.
2. Illocutionary Acts
Illocutionary act is the real actions which are performed by the utterance.
Illocutionary acts are not easily identifiable, because illocutionary acts do with
who speak to whom, when and where it was done and the illocutionary speech
act. Examples:
The intended meaning of the speaker is to ask someone to close the window.
3. Perlocutionary Acts
In this case, when the speaker says “it’s raining outside”. The hearer will close the
window as he understand the intended meaning.
One of the ways to find out the exact illocutionary forces containing in a
particular utterance is that to use illocutionary acts. Austin (1983:34-38) defines
five categories of illocutionary acts that can be used as illocutionary force in
identifying devices as follows:
1. Commissives
Examples:
Directives refer to speech acts that are to cause the hearer to take a
particular action. The illocutionary verbs included in this category are ask, beg,
bid, command, demand, request, recommend.
Examples:
3. Declarative
Examples:
4. Expressives
Expressives refers to speech acts that express the speaker’s attitudes and
emotions towards the proposition. Some illocutionary verbs that belong to this
category are apologize, commiserate, congratulate, pardon.
Examples:
5. Representative
Representative is a kind of speech act that states what the speaker believes
to be the case or not, for example state, conclude, represent, deduce, etc. By using
this utterance, his or her expresses belief that the proportional content is true.
Examples:
Smith (1991:100) states that direct is describe as the primitive directive act.
However, it is as a complex of different acts. Firstly, it describes as request and
order in that by directing the speaker wants the hearer to do something, and
expects to do it without any conflict, and yet at the same time is not making an
order that the hearer carry out the act. In a sense it is co-operative behavior. The
second meaning of direct is to give directions, and, third which is really a variant
on the second seeks an explanation for why directions are sometimes given as
imperatives. The second and third explanations of direct are connected, because it
usually relates to a whole sequence of acts, not just one. It includes direct when
used for giving instructions in the same basic category as argue, a structure and
not a speech act.
For example:
Searle (1973:35) states that there are at least nine functions of directive
speech acts. They are command, request, suggestion, warning, order, beg, invite,
permit, and advise. The classifications will be described as follow:
1. Command
Command is effective only if the speaker has some degree of control over
the actions of the addressee. In this case, speaker in authority, express a wish that
an addressee should not act the speaker wants to the addressee not to act. For
examples:
2. Request
For examples:
3. Suggestion
For examples:
4. Warning
Warning is the speaker’s utterance to tell or inform the addressee about the
danger. In warning, there is a threatening and using positive imperative.
For examples:
- No exhibition!
5. Beg
Beg is the speaker’s utterance to tell or inform the addressee about entreat
something. For examples:
6. Invite
Invite is when the speaker’s utterance try to take someone to other place
for some reasons. For examples:
7. Permit
For examples:
In deciding the forms of directive speech acts, there are two kinds of forms
can describe in this research. First is the sentence patterns the directive speech
acts and second is the dimension of directive speech act. The explanations of
those categories are as follows:
There are three sentence patterns of the directive speech act, they will be
described as follows (Huddleston, 2017: 54) :
1. Imperative
2. Interrogative
3. Declarative
1. Based on Levinson (1983: 101) there are two kinds of directness forms, here
are:
a. Direct Speech Act
The utterance of direct speech act has syntactic form that reflects the
direct illocutionary act. In other words, an utterance is to contain direct
speech act if there is a correspondence between the form and the function
of the utterance. For example: Don’t avoid me! The form of this utterance
is imperative. It is a command and therefore is used to get someone to do
something. As the form of the utterance, in this case imperative,
corresponds to its meaning and function, it is considered to be direct
speech act.
b. Indirect Speech Act
In simple way, the meaning and function of the indirect speech act is not
related to its syntactic form. For example: Can you open the window?
Based on the syntactic form, this utterance is defined as interrogative.
Normally, interrogative acts as question and is used for asking. However
instead of asking and eliciting information from the hearer, the speaker of
this utterance tends to get the hearer to do something; that is open the
window. Meanwhile, to get someone to do something is the function
performed by imperative. Therefore, the utterance “Can you open the
window?” is classified as indirect speech acts since it does not have direct
relation between its form and meaning as well as function.
2. Based on Recanati (2002:264-274) there are two kinds of literalness forms,
here are:
a. Literal Speech Act
Literal speech act refers to the act of making utterance that means as what
we say. For example: when one eats eleven breads and then announce I
feel just satisfied, he means exactly like what he says. Therefore, it is
consider to represent literal speech act.
b. Non-literal speech act
Non-literal speech act is the opposite of literal one. Speech act of this
kind convoys meaning which is not the same like what the speaker says.
For example: a student who has finished his biology exam and found out
that he got D score and says to his friend “I love biology”. He does not
mean that he likes biology but he really does not like biology and it is
contradiction with what he feels.
2.3 Factor of Communication
1. Situation
Situation includes the setting and scene. The setting is about physical
circumstance of communicative event, including the time and place. Setting refers
to time and place in which a speech act takes place. The scene is the psychological
setting which refers to the kind of speech event taking place according to culture
definition as formal or informal, serious or festive.
2. Participants
Participants are the second factor that consist of at least four participants;
role, addresser, addressee, hearer or audience who are involved in a conversation.
It deals with who is speaking and who is the speaking to. The social factors such
as age, gender, status, social distance, and role or profession of the participants
have also to be considered.
3. Ends
Ends refer to purpose the speech events and speech acts. This purpose can
be divided into outcome and goal. Outcome is defined as the purpose of the events
from a culture point of view. Goal is defined as the purpose of the individual
participants.
4. Act Sequence
Act sequence refers to the message of the speech event or speech act. It
consists of message form and content. Message form deals with how something is
said by the participants, whereas message content deals with what the participants
talk about or it is simply called a topic of a conversation.
5. Key
It is the fifth component that refers to the tone manner or spirit in which an
act event is performed. Hymes add that key also refers to the feeling, atmosphere,
and attitude. Manner, feeling, and attitude are used in reference to the situation.
6. Instrument
7. Norms
8. Genre
Andari (2011), analyze speech acts components. Her study was library
research. Her data source was movie entitled Green Hornet. There were two
theories used in her study. They were theory of speech act proposed by Austin
(1962) and the ethnography of communication that was proposed by Hymes
(1972). She discovered that the components of speech acts were closely related.
Each of them cannot stand alone since when the speaker performed locutionary
acts, there would be illocutionary acts intended by the speaker. In turn, when the
hearer achieved what was intended by the speaker, it was said that the hearer got
an effect of the utterance.
This study however not only discussed about the components of speech
acts but also its dimensions, i.e. directness and literalness. Speech acts that was
found was classified based on their directness and literalness such as indirect and
nonliteral speech acts. Furthermore, the interaction between directness and
literalness dimension was also discussed. Generally, when discussing about the
types of speech act, only direct and indirect speech acts are introduces.
Nastri (2004) also discusses about speech acts. This study investigated the
extent to which these communicative goals are reflected in the language structure
of away messages, by examining the speech acts performed through the
production of 483 away messages crafted by 44 participants. The messages are
also analyze for the use of non-standard orthography and humor.
The theory used during the analysis is the theory of speech acts proposed
by Searle. This study used a sample population consisting of 49 undergraduate
students who were recruited in Spring 2004 from a communication class at a large
northeastern university in the United States. The sample consisted of 29 females
(59.1%) and 20 males (40.9%), who ranged in age from 18 to 22 years old.
Students in the study were given course credit for their participation. Five
participants did not produce any away messages; thus the final sample size was
reduced to 44 participants.