Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The results
indicate that
lecturer
attitude has
the highest
mean score
(=3.07); while
the least mean
score being
for teaching
skill (=2.72).
Provided
below are
results on
sampling
adequacy.
22 Everyone has a
difference in terms of
Faculty of
interest, behavior,
Yunus, Islamic
The importance response to the
Wahab, Contemporary, Qualitative Identify five theories
of personality N/A environment and so on. N/A
Ismail, & Kuala Nerus, Study briefly
traits This can be seen through
Othman, 2018 Terengganu,
different trait personality
Malaysia
in each other
23 The
traditional or
innovative
Creates clear
methods of
understanding
teaching are
critically
Department of PowerPoint
Modern examined,
C. Namitha, Education, can be used
Methods of evaluated and N/A N/A N/A
2018 Tamil Nadu, widely
Teaching some
India
modifications
Innovative
in the
thinking
delivery of
improves
knowledge is
suggested
24 Alamgir K, Communication Department of Selects a To evaluate the role The data was teacher communication N/A
Salahuddin K, skills of a Health & suitable of teacher collected skills have significant
Syed Zia ul teacher and its Physical personal and communication from the role in the academic
Islam, role in the education, its proper skills in the respondents achievement of the
Manzoor K, development of Pakistan number academic through students.
2017 the students’ which performance of the personally
contact and
by using the
academic provide developed
students.
success authentic data scale. After
collection of
data
25 Today’s teachers are
required to be more
effective and truer to
A study of their profession. In order
Department of
teacher to be able to articulate
Hadiya Education,
effectiveness N/A N/A N/A teaching with new N/A
Habib, 2017 Jammu &
and its paradigm of learning, be
Kashmir, India
importance adoptive and supportive
in dealing with new set
of students belonging to
different age groups
26 Sotelo The Department of Qualitative How teaching The Teaching It has been found that the N/A
Effectiveness of Practice can
Claudius Education, research practice was duration spent for the
Teaching be conducted
Kombi & Practice in Morogoro, method organized by the in a number teaching practice was not
Improving of forms
Ernes Simon Tanzania teacher training enough
Student depending on
Kira, 2013 Teachers’ Universities and the
Teaching Skills institution.
whether the teaching
in Tanzania Most of the
The practice was teacher
Effectiveness of training
effective
Teaching institutions in
Practice in Tanzania
Improving send their
Student students for
Teachers’ Teaching
Teaching Skills Practice
in Tanzania during the
The end of
academic
effectiveness of
year
teaching The teaching
practice in practice can
improving be conducted
student teacher in several
teaching skills forms
in Tanzania depending on
the
institutions.
Most of the
teacher
training
institutions in
Tanzania
send their
students for
teaching
practice
during the
end of
academic
year
27 T-test and
variance
analysis were
used by
utilizing
SPSS
software. The
results
showed that
the
cooperative
learning
teaching
method has a
higher effect
on students
A Comparison learning than
between the the lecture
Effect of teaching
Cooperative method. Also,
Farzad Learning semi- the results
Mohammadja Teaching School of experimental showed that
ni & Method and education and double- the
N/A N/A N/A
Forouzan Lecture sciences, group type cooperative
Tonkaboni, Teaching Tehran, Iraq (experimental learning
2015 Method on and control method
Students’ results in
Learning and higher
Satisfaction satisfaction in
Level students that
the lecture
teaching
method.
Female
students had
higher
satisfaction
and learning
levels in
cooperative
learning
teaching
method than
male students
did.
28 Som Pal Teaching Department of Quantitative To determine the The N/A N/A
Baliyan & Effectiveness in educational approach level of teaching Statistical
Fazlur Private Higher foundations, effectiveness as Package for
Rehman Education Gaborone, perceived by Social
Sciences
(SPSS)
software ver.
23 was used
for data
analysis
whereby a
One sample t-
test and
Independent
students in private
t-tests were
higher education
used. A One
institutions.
sample t-test
Institutions in was
To determine the
Botswana: employed to
gender difference in
Moorad, 2018 Analysis of Botswana determine the
teaching
Students’ level of
effectiveness as
Perceptions teaching
perceived by
effectiveness
students in private
while an
higher education
Independent
institutions.
t-test was
employed to
determine the
gender, age,
nationality
differences in
the students’
perceptions
on teaching
effectiveness
29 Martin S. The reasoned New York N/A N/A N/A The theory of reasoned N/A
Hagger, 2019 action approach action demonstrated
and the theories effectiveness in
of reasoned predicting variability
action and in people’s behavior
planned across many contexts,
behavior populations, and
behaviours. Ajzen
modified the
theory of reasoned action
to account for
behaviours that were not
under the complete
control
of the individual. The
theory of planned
behavior introduced
perceived behavioural
control as
an additional predictor of
intentions.
30 Lara A. Students’ N/A Quantitative N/A A multiple Hypothesis one is that the study looked at
regression and two cultures within a
Frumkin & perceptions of approach there is a positive
follow-up select
Murphy A, lecturer’s paired relationship between population (i.e.,
analyses students in one
2007 classroom student perceptions of
provided Masters
communication some support teacher commination programme). Thus,
for hypothesis one should be
style patterns and module
1. cautious when
Correlational outcome generalizing these
analysis findings. It may be
would not that the Chinese and
provide Hypothesis two is European samples of
answers to MSc students at this
exploratory, it is
the questions university are
of causation expected that there will distinct subsets of
(Scaife, Chinese and
be cultural differences
2004), European computing
therefore with the Chinese and UK science MSc
multiple students.
students
regression The study looked at
was used for
two cultures within a
the analyses.
It was select population.
believed that
Thus, one should be
there would
be a cautious when
significant
generalizing these
relationship
between findings.
grades and the
five
communicatio Another limitation is
n factors
the data itself
which there
was, (F
(1,96) = 3.01,
p < .05).
However,
only two of
the five
communicatio
n factors were
significant in
the
post-hoc tests,
challenging (F
(1,96) = 2.48,
p <.05) and
controlling
behaviours (F
(1,96) = 2.43,
p
<.01) such
that higher
grades were
received by
the students
who
perceived
their teachers
to be
more
controlling
and/or
challenging.
There were no
significant
findings with
respect to
grades for the
encourageme
nt and praise,
non-
verbal, and
understanding
and friendly
behaviour
variables
A multiple
regression and
follow-up
paired
analyses
provided
some support
for hypothesis
1.
Correlational
analysis
would not
provide
answers to
the questions
of causation
(Scaife,
2004),
therefore
multiple
regression
was used for
the analyses.
It was
believed that
there would
be a
significant
relationship
between
grades and the
five
communicatio
n factors
which there
was, (F
(1,96) = 3.01,
p < .05).
However,
only two of
the five
communicatio
n factors were
significant in
the
post-hoc tests,
challenging (F
(1,96) = 2.48,
p <.05) and
controlling
behaviours (F
(1,96) = 2.43,
p
<.01) such
that higher
grades were
received by
the students
who
perceived
their teachers
to be
more
controlling
and/or
challenging.
There were no
significant
findings with
respect to
grades for the
encourageme
nt and praise,
non-
verbal, and
understanding
and friendly
behaviour
variables
A multiple
regression and
follow-up
paired
analyses
provided
some support
for hypothesis
1.
Correlational
analysis
would not
provide
answers to
the questions
of causation
(Scaife,
2004),
therefore
multiple
regression
was used for
the analyses.
It was
believed that
there would
be a
significant
relationship
between
grades and the
five
communicatio
n factors
which there
was, (F
(1,96) = 3.01,
p < .05).
However,
only two of
the five
communicatio
n factors were
significant in
the
post-hoc tests,
challenging (F
(1,96) = 2.48,
p <.05) and
controlling
behaviours (F
(1,96) = 2.43,
p
<.01) such
that higher
grades were
received by
the students
who
perceived
their teachers
to be
more
controlling
and/or
challenging.
There were no
significant
findings with
respect to
grades for the
encourageme
nt and praise,
non-
verbal, and
understanding
and friendly
behaviour
variables
A multiple
regression and
follow-up
paired
analyses
provided
some support
for hypothesis
1.
Correlational
analysis
would not
provide
answers to
the questions
of causation
(Scaife,
2004),
therefore
multiple
regression
was used for
the analyses.
It was
believed that
there would
be a
significant
relationship
between
grades and the
five
communicatio
n factors
which there
was, (F
(1,96) = 3.01,
p < .05).
However,
only two of
the five
communicatio
n factors were
significant in
the
post-hoc tests,
challenging (F
(1,96) = 2.48,
p <.05) and
controlling
behaviours (F
(1,96) = 2.43,
p
<.01) such
that higher
grades were
received by
the students
who
perceived
their teachers
to be
more
controlling
and/or
challenging.
There were no
significant
findings with
respect to
grades for the
encourageme
nt and praise,
non-
verbal, and
understanding
and friendly
behaviour
variables
A multiple
regression and
follow-up
paired
analyses
provided
some support
for hypothesis
1.
Correlational
analysis
would not
provide
answers to
the questions
of causation
(Scaife,
2004),
therefore
multiple
regression
was used for
the analyses.
It was
believed that
there would
be a
significant
relationship
between
grades and the
five
communicatio
n factors
which there
was, (F
(1,96) = 3.01,
p < .05).
However,
only two of
the five
communicatio
n factors were
significant in
the
post-hoc tests,
challenging (F
(1,96) = 2.48,
p <.05) and
controlling
behaviours (F
(1,96) = 2.43,
p
<.01) such
that higher
grades were
received by
the students
who
perceived
their teachers
to be
more
controlling
and/or
challenging.
There were no
significant
findings with
respect to
grades for the
encourageme
nt and praise,
non-
verbal, and
understanding
and friendly
behaviour
variables