Professional Documents
Culture Documents
and
Development System
(PADS)
SENIOR MANAGEMENT
SECTION WEIGHTAGE
RESULTS (B) 60%
INNOVATION 15%
COMPETENCIE 25%
1.7 Annexures
2.0 Process
2.1 The parties to the assessment are Assessee, Assessor (Assessee's functional senior) and Reviewer
(Assessor's functional senior - wherever applicable)
- Mention those incidents wherein the actions or behaviour demonstrated has had a significant impact (either positive or
negative) on the outcome of the situation
a Rate his/her performance on a four point scale as per rating guideline for Sections B,C & D with supporting comments
a Mention training programs attended during the previous year, specifying the application of learning at workplace and its
impact on self and/or function/organisation
a Indicate Developmental areas in the order of priority keeping in view the current role and future needs / aspirations
a Specify career aspirations keeping in mind the desired role one would see himself/herself playing 5 years from now
a Discuss, review and record Special/Noteworthy incidents with respect to Sections B, C and D
a Discuss with Assessee on Assessee's performance and relevant aspects with respect to Sections A to F
- DRM Practice (gap analysis, quality of root cause identification, effectiveness of counter measures etc.,)
a Record his/her scores on a four point scale as per rating guideline and comment on Assessee's performance on
Sections B,C & D
a Give comments on:
I Training Programs
- Extent to which the training needs identified for the previous year has been met
- Impact of training programs attended by the Assessee during the previous year
a Identify and record the overall training needs keeping in mind the Assessee's Career aspirations & IDP
a Jointly discuss and fill up with Assessee on Learning & Development (Section E) and provide support plan on Career
Aspirations (Section F)
2.5 Assessee and Assessor to sign the form on completion of the review discussion
a In case of dual reporting, the administrative senior will complete the assessment jointly with the functional senior and
sign the form
a In case of serious differences in quantitative ratings and disagreements in qualitative assessments between the
assessee and the assessor, HR will escalate it to the reviewing officer whose ratings/assessments will be final in such
cases.
2.6 Final rating for Senior Management
a For those reporting to Company Head,the Company Head will decide and record the final rating
a For all others, the Company Head will decide the final rating, based on the recommendations by the assessor
a Rating in decimal value shall be applicable when the competency demonstrated is between two consecutive competency levels
- Participation means HR Head will sit through the discussions between Assessor and Assessee as process observer in select cases.
Educational/Professional Qualifications:
Designation:
Date of Joining:
Name & Designation of Assessor:
Last 3 years Rating: 2010: 2009: 2008: Date of last promotion:
SECTION - A
Special/Noteworthy Incidents
Mention the Special/Noteworthy Incidents w.r.t. to the sections below:
Assessee Assessor
Section What When What When
Results
Innovation
Competencies
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
Assessor's Comments
Assessor's Comments
SECTION - D (25%)
Rating on a 4 point scale
Sl.No Competencies
Assessee Assessor
a) Business Focus
b) Strategic Thinking
c) Build Leadership
d) Ownership
e) Maturity
f) Commitment to Values
Sub Total - D (a+b+c+d+e+f)
Multiply by weightage (1.04)
Total - Section D _ / 25 _ / 25
Assessee's Comments
Assessor's Comments
Assessee Assessor
Final Score (SECTION B+C+D)
_/100 _/100
Company:
External:
*For Dual reporting , both Administrative and Functional Seniors will sign
Comments of Company Head,if any:
Final Rating
Job Enlargement
Others (Specify)