Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering

Assignment No: 1
Module Name: Control Systems
Module Code: ELEC 20005.2
Session: A

In Semester Individual Assignment-1 Fall 20

Name of Student: Yaseen Said Muftah Al-Yaqoobi

Student ID: 14S11936
Contents
TASK 3:.......................................................................................................................................................................... 2
Question 1:....................................................................................................................................................................2
Part a:........................................................................................................................................................................2
Part b:........................................................................................................................................................................ 4
Part c:........................................................................................................................................................................6
Part d:........................................................................................................................................................................ 7
Question: 2....................................................................................................................................................................9
Part a:........................................................................................................................................................................9
Part b:........................................................................................................................................................................ 9
Question 3:.................................................................................................................................................................. 11
Question 4:.................................................................................................................................................................. 14
Part a:...................................................................................................................................................................... 14
Part b:...................................................................................................................................................................... 16
Part c:...................................................................................................................................................................... 16
Question 5:.................................................................................................................................................................. 17
Part a:...................................................................................................................................................................... 17
Part b:...................................................................................................................................................................... 17
References.................................................................................................................................................................. 18
TASK 3:

Question 1:

Part a:

Answer: [ CITATION NOR17 \l 1033 ] [ CITATION KAT02 \l 1033 ]

1
G(s)=
s ( s+9)

G( s) 1 /(s 2 +9 s )
H ( s )= =
1+ G(s ) 1+1/(s2 +9 s)

1
H ( s )= 2
(s +9 s+1)

From above equation we get the root of transfer function with unity negative feedback as -0.1125,
-8.8875. It is the over damped system as roots are real and distinct. It has damping factor, Ᵹ>1 given by
comparing above equation with general equation below as 2 Ᵹ wn=9 and w 2n=1 which gives
w n=1andꝽ=4.5.

G ( s) w 2n
= 2
1+ G(s) ( s +2 Ᵹ w n s+w 2n)

The settling time, Peak time, %OS for G(s) is calculated using MATLAB which code is given below:
clc
clear all
s=tf('s');
G=1/(s*(s+9));
fd=feedback(G,1);
step(fd/s) %% for ramp input take step of (fd/s)
stepinfo(fd)
 Step Response
100
untitled1
90

80

70

60
Amplitude

50

40

30

20

10

0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Time (seconds)

It gives:
Rise Time: 19.5274 sec
Settling Time: 34.8829 sec
Overshoot: 0
Peak Time: 93.7260 sec

And steady state error is given by:

sR(s)
e (∞) = lim
s→0 1+G( s)
For ramp input, R(s)=1/s2 by putting it in above equation we get
1
s( )
= s2
lim
s → 0 1+G( s)

1
( )
s
¿ lim
s → 0 1+G(s)

1
¿ lim
s→0 s+ sG(s)
1
¿ lim
s→0 1
s
s (s +a)
¿ lim s+ a
s→0

¿9
Part b:

Answer: [ CITATION NOR17 \l 1033 ] [ CITATION KAT02 \l 1033 ]

1
G(s)=
s ( s+9)

1
G (s ) s ( s+9 )
G 1 ( s )= = ¿
1+ K f s∗G( s) Kf s
(1+ )
s ( s+ 9 )

1
¿
( s( s+ 9)+ K f s)

1
¿ 2
( s +9 s+ K f s)

G( s) K
G2 ( s )=K = 2
1+ K f s∗G(s) ( s +9 s+ K f s)

G2 ( s ) K
G 3 ( s )= =
1+ G2(s) ¿ ¿

So, the close loop transfer function for motor with tachometer in feedback and amplifier in series is derived
above.
For calculating Kf and K value for a system with %O.S=8% and settling time=1sec. we use the following
formulas for calculating zeta damping factor by using %OS
%OS
−ln ⁡( )
100
Ᵹ=
%OS
√
π 2+ ln 2 (
100
)

−ln ⁡(0.08)
¿
√ π 2 +ln2 ( 0.08)
2.5257
¿
4.0297
¿ 0.626

Similarly we calculate wn by using settling time and Ᵹ(damping factor compute above).
Settling time (2%):
 4
t s=
Ᵹ wn
4
1=
0. 626∗wn
4
w n=
0. 626

¿ 6.39 sec −1

As general close loop transfer function for second order systems with negative unity feedback is
given by

w 2n
G4 ( s )= 2 2
(s + 2Ᵹ w n s+ wn )

By comparing G 4 ( s ) and G3 ( s ), we get

w 2n=K
K=6.42
K=40.8
Similarly for finding Kf, we take

9+ K f =2Ᵹ w n
9+ K f =2∗0.626∗6.4
K f =−0.9872
Part c:

Answer: [ CITATION NOR17 \l 1033 ] [ CITATION KAT02 \l 1033 ]

Steady State error for Compensated System:

sR ( s)
e (∞) = lim
s→0 1+G2 ( s )
1
s( )
s2
¿ lim
s → 0 1+G 2 ( s )

1
¿ lim
s→0 s+ s G 2 ( s )
1
¿ lim
s→0 K
s
s (s + ( 9+ K f ) )
1
¿
K
9+ K f

9+ K f
¿
K
9−0.9872
¿
40.8
¿ 0.196
The steady state error of compensated system is only 0.196 while that of uncompensated system was 9
which was calculated in part (a) of this question. There is significant reduction in error due to
compensation.
Part d:

Answer: [ CITATION NOR17 \l 1033 ] [ CITATION KAT02 \l 1033 ]

For Compensated System G2(s): K=40.8 and Kf=-0.9872

40.8
G 2 ( s )= 2
( s +9 s−0.9872 s)
Code:

clc
clear all
s=tf('s');
G2=40.8/((s^2+9*s-0.9872*s));
fd1=feedback(G2,1);
step(fd1/s)
stepinfo(fd1)

Step Response
100

90

80

70

60
Amplitude

50

40

30

20

10

0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Time (seconds)
It gives:
Rise Time: 0.3010 sec
Settling Time: 0.9372 sec
Overshoot: 7.9655
Peak Time: 0.6322 sec

By observing the performance parameter of compensated and uncompensated system, it is clear that
addition of compensator make prominent improvement in transients of system and its response time
decrease and system now has fast transient response. Rise, Settling and Peak time of compensated system
reduce significantly and now it is underdamped system.
Question: 2

Part a:

Answer: [ CITATION NOR17 \l 1033 ] [ CITATION KAT02 \l 1033 ]

x2(t)

m2ẍ2

Part b:

Answer: [ CITATION NOR17 \l 1033 ] [ CITATION KAT02 \l 1033 ]

m2 ẍ2+b2(ẋ2-ẋ1)+k2x2+k1(x2- x1)=0 (1)
m1ẍ1+ k1(x1-x2)+ b2(ẋ1-ẋ2)+ b1ẋ1= F(t) (2)
Taking Laplace transform of (1) and (2), we get
X2(s) (s2m2+b2s+ (k2 +k1))-X1(s) (k1+b2s) =0 (3)
X1(s) (s2m1+ (b1+b2) s+k1)-X2(s) (k1+b2s) =F(t) (4)

Transfer function is given by:

G(s) =X2(s)/F(s) = (b2s+k1)/∆ (5)
In equation (5), ∆ is given by

−(k 1 +b2 s ) s2 m 2+ b2 s+(k 2+ k 1)

∆=
[ 2
s m 1 + s ( b1 +b 2) + k 1 −(b2 s+ k 1 ) ]
Question 3:

Answer: [ CITATION NOR17 \l 1033 ] [ CITATION KAT02 \l 1033 ]

Question 4:

Part a:

Answer:[ CITATION NOR17 \l 1033 ] [ CITATION KAT02 \l 1033 ]

Step 1:
Label all branch current in figure 5

Step2:
Select state variable for energy storing component that is inductor and capacitor
d v c (t)
C =i c (t)
dt

d i L (t)
L =v L (t )
dt

Step 3:
By applying KCL on figure 5, we get
i c ( t )=i L (t ) +i L (t)

i r ( t ) =ir ( t ) +i c (t)
d v c (t )
i r ( t ) =i L ( t )+C
dt

From voltage across inductor in figure 5, we get

 d i L (t)
L =v L (t )
dt
Step 4:
By substituting the result of equation fid in step 3 in step 2, we get

d v c (t)
C =i r ( t ) −i L (t)
dt

ir ( t ) i L ( t )
v̇ c (t )= −
C C

v ( t ) −v c ( t ) i L ( t )
v̇ c (t )= −
RC C

v ( t ) v c ( t ) iL ( t )
v̇ c (t )= − −
RC RC RC
By putting value of R= 2Ω; C=8F in above equation, we get

v ( t ) v c ( t ) iL ( t )
v̇ c ( t )= − −
16 16 16

Similarly for

d iL ( t )
L =v L ( t )
dt
v (t )
i˙L (t)= c
L
v (t )
i˙L (t)= c
5
Part b:

Answer: [ CITATION NOR17 \l 1033 ] [ CITATION KAT02 \l 1033 ]

−1 −1

[ ]
i˙L (t)
[ ][
v̇ c ( t )
= 16
1
5
vc ( t )
0 iL ( t )
][
16 v c ( t ) +
1

]
16 v ( t )
0

y= [ 1 1 ]
[ ]
i L (t )

−1 −1
System Matrix = A =
16
1
5
[ ] 16
0

1
Input Matrix = B = 16
0 []
Output Matrix = C = [ 1 1 ]

Part c:

Answer: [ CITATION NOR17 \l 1033 ] [ CITATION KAT02 \l 1033 ]

Its major benefit is that it can be used for time variant, time invariant, Single input single output system
(SISO), Multi input Multi output (MIMO), Linear and non Linear systems.
A part from this it is easy to solve as it represent n order differential equations in n first order
differential equation.
Question 5:

Part a:

Answer: [ CITATION NOR17 \l 1033 ] [ CITATION KAT02 \l 1033 ]

For given system to be state controllable:

If rank nxn matrix be ‘n’, such that
2 n−1
CM =[ B ։ AB ։ A B ։ … A B]

If CM is full rank and the vectors B։ AB ։ A 2 B ։ … An−1 B are linearly independent

3 2 −1
[
A= 1 2 4
1 1 −1 ]
2 3 2 −1 2 9

[]
B= 1
−1 [ ][ ] [ ]
AB= 1 2 4 1
1 1 −1 −1
= 0
4

3 2 −1 3 2 −1 2 23

[ ][
A2 B= 1 2 4 1 2 4
][ ] [ ]
1 = 25
1 1 −1 1 1 −1 −1 5

Then controllability matrix is

2 9 23

[
CM = 1 0 25
−1 4 5 ]
Part b:

Answer: [ CITATION NOR17 \l 1033 ] [ CITATION KAT02 \l 1033 ]

The given system is controllable as it is full rank and all the vectors are linearly independent

References

[1] N. S. NISE, CONTROL SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, Pomona: Wiley, 2017.

[2] K. OGATA, MODERN CONTROL ENGINEERING, Tehran: Aeeizh, 2002.