We have talked about the knowledge of the past region and it is a paradox of the real

world and we will talk about it further.

An unborn child enters a world of languages. In other words, within a systematically

organized knowledge conceived through language. He adopts that knowledge based on

his internal need.

This time we are trying to explain the fictional and magical nature of knowledge and how it is

an internal need. Here we use the idea of 窶銀€蟻 n internal interest to indicate a subjective

interest. These subjective needs cannot be explained by knowledge. Cannot be interpreted

According to the religious, philosophical and scientific knowledge of the people, there are two

divisions in the world as good people and bad people. But in our experience, we think not. For

example, Mahatma Gandhi was a good man.

He is regarded as a non-violent, virile man and the father of India. But the fate of his son

and his relationship with Gandhi are extremely painful and contradict Gandhi's idea of 窶

銀€吉 oodness. (2007 film Thbayasa or Thyaera) According to the accompanying

women, he was a man who loved the touch of women

 Gandhi's attitudes toward revolutionaries such as Bhagat Singh, on the other hand, were

particularly closely related to Mountbatten's wife.

But according to a staunch Indian nationalist, the knowledge he creates about Gandhi is

twofold the knowledge of a staunch anti-Hindu Muslim. Such knowledge is created according

to internal needs.

We take Adolf Hitler. He is a bad man. He was a murderer who killed hundreds of thousands

of Jews. Participated in World War II. An enemy of the Communists. But according to his

autobiography and the memories of those closest to him, he was a vegetarian and a non-

alcoholic veteran. On the day of the German occupation of France he left all his work and

visited all the art galleries in the whole city of Paris.

We, on the other hand, see the Nazis' Outwish prisons as something that should never happen

again in a world where German Aryans killed and tortured Jews, regardless of age or infancy,

and used the Jews for scientific experiments.

But according to a documentary produced by the BBC, there were Jewish women and

Germans who fell in love with the Outwish prison and they worked to save the families of

their Jewish girlfriends from death.

It also mentions how the Jews were handed over to the Germans by the Jewish leaders (known

as the Jewish leaders who put the Jews in slums as a first step in the extermination and ruled

those slums).

The film also depicts the true story of a German tycoon, Dhinr, who took care of the Jews in

his factory. Thus it must be clear how good and evil are represented simultaneously in Hitler

and in Nazism.
Michael Jackson is a very beautiful singer. He sang against environmental destruction and war.

Known as someone who loved little children very much. Suddenly Michael Jackson was

convicted of child abuse and accused of marrying his daughter to get the rights to Alvis

Presley's songs. Accordingly, Michael Jackson is a combination of good and bad.

There is a strong racist anti-Muslim sentiment in Sri Lanka today and the Muslim has created

knowledge as a bad evil evil. But the songs of Muslim singer Mohideen Beck are essential to

every Buddhist festival.

Mia Khalifa is a sex film actress of Lebanese Muslim descent. She is very popular in the Asian

region and in Sri Lanka. Accordingly, attraction to Islam as well as repulsion is included in it.

No one says a person is good and we forget the bad in him. It is our internal need. Many

people know about Minister Mervyn Silva that he is a bad person.

But in an election he won by a landslide. Those who voted were forgotten. The bad in him.

Many who voted said. That he voted because he was a straight man working straight.

Another thought that Mervyn could not vote without doing business in the colony.

Accordingly, at the functional level, Mervyn was, for better or worse, an internal need of the

people.

On the other hand, walking on the right side of the road, following the road signs is the general

law of the land. But those who violate it become ignorant of it because of an internal need.
The above examples are to illustrate the contradiction in our knowledge. We have said that the

world conceptualized by language is built on opposites. These concepts are systematically

organized and knowledge is created.

Good - Bad, Ugly - Beautiful, Love - Hate, White - Black, True - False and so on. One of these

opposites is inextricably linked with the other.

When someone talks about the good, he forgets the bad. When we talk about the bad, we

forget the good. So is it good for him to get close to a friend? We also use his evil to get away

from him.

When a very close friend betrays us, we say I do not know that he is so bad. This "I don't

know" idea is very important. But the truth is that he forgot this evil because of the inner

desire to maintain the friendship.

Accordingly, the paradox of the perceptions of the five senses in an object or person is also

contained in the person and the object itself.

It should be clear that we create knowledge based on our inner needs, that is, subjective needs,

and that knowledge is always a hoax, a delusion.

Danuma 3
We discussed how the knowledge of the past region relates to our internal needs as we create

it. This time we are trying to explain the nature of assigning knowledge to an external factor in

the creation of knowledge.

Extraterrestrial factors are the source of every knowledge system ever created in the world.

For example, a few years ago, Nalin de Silva claimed that the cause of kidney disease in the

Rajarata area was arsenic in the soil of Rajarata and that he had discovered arsenic in the soil

through God Natha.

Later, Western physicians and scientists also discovered the presence of arsenic in the soil of

Rajarata. They said. Arsenic was found in the soil. These two ideas later led to a great debate

between national thinkers and Western thinkers.

Marxists say that Nalin de Silva is sowing the myth by taking the side of Western scientists

and doctors. Charged. Nalinda Silva criticized scientific thought, saying that Western science

was a complete lie. Some faced the dilemma of not being able to decide what was right

because both sides claim the same result as arsenic.

While national thinkers here deified the source of knowledge, Western scientists and

physicians turned it into chemical elements in the soil. National thinkers want to confirm the

existence of God, while Western scientists want to confirm the existence of matter outside of

us and our ability to know it.

In both cases the source of knowledge is an external factor. Both of these ideas are creations.

And takes the same form. National thinkers try to prove the existence of God historically by

claiming that Western knowledge is a myth and a creation. But the only difference between

Western knowledge and their knowledge is the substitution of God for the external material

world of men.

If anyone talks about a knowledge fiction and an ignorant existence, we have no argument

with them. But to us these two are two systems of knowledge and have nothing to do with real

existence.
But both of these knowledge systems can meet certain requirements. For example, the

mathematical concepts discovered by Ramanujan, a mathematician who lived in India, were

very helpful to man in space travel. But Ramanujan stated that he got this mathematical

knowledge from the goddess Navakali. He thought that after worshiping the goddess and

going to sleep, the goddess would give him mathematical concepts in a dream.

Ramanujan conceptualizes his experience and creates mathematical theories. But his

reluctance to take responsibility for his creations leaves it to God. A Western scientist or

mathematician does the same thing. They create concepts about the outside world through

their experiences and present them as what they have discovered from the outside world.

Anything in Western knowledge must be proved and knowledge cannot be presented as one’s

own imagination. Therefore, scientists should submit their knowledge in the form of test

papers, which should be validated by experiments.

Accordingly, it is the nature of knowledge that we have a reluctance to be responsible for the

knowledge we create and to direct it to an external source. Either knowledge is created by God

and given to man. Or knowledge of the outside world is hidden from us. It must be found.

Both of these ideas contradict the notion that knowledge is a creation of us to escape from the

internal contradictions that build up in our experience of contact with the outside world.

We cannot comprehend the world with our knowledge and we can only imagine the world

through conjecture. None of the concepts so created are accessible to our senses, and only the

five senses perceptible to images, smells, tastes, sounds, and touches are given to them by the

physical.

We conceptualize their differences. The physicalities associated with certain abstract concepts
are not even accessible to our senses. Ex: - Gravity, Numbers and Mathematical Concepts,

Magnetic Fields etc. Can be specified.

According to Marxist knowledge, there is no God. According to the Christian faith, God

exists. The following joke is presented to show the uncertainty of the Marxists' knowledge of

the existence of God and the uncertainty of Christian knowledge of the existence of God and

that they are not responsible for their own knowledge.

As we all know, Yuri Gagarin was the first man to go into space according to Western science.

After his trip, he met the then leader of the Soviet Union, Nikita Khrushchev. He asked

Gagarin what he saw in space. Gagarin said he had seen heaven and angels.

Panicked, Khrushchev placed his index finger on his lips and told Gagarin not to tell anyone.

A few weeks later, Gagarin went to the Vatican to meet with the pastor. What the Pope saw in
space as before. Gagarin asked. Gagarin said he had never seen heaven or angels. The pope

also put his index finger to his lips and told them not to tell anyone.

If he was responsible for atheistic knowledge, Khrushchev should have told Gagarin, "Are you

crazy, angels and heaven?" The Pope also broke into Yuri Gagarin and told him that you were

crazy because you were a sinful Soviet atheist that the angels were invisible.

In the real world, lumbering elephants are exposed by the aggression of speeding midgets.

Priests, on the other hand, are the ones who install CCTV cameras and protect their temples,

doubting their knowledge of God and not being responsible for that knowledge.

We need to affirm that knowledge is created by man as a result of the outside world and

human activity. And the existence of the outside world or God is only what we need as a

support to impose this knowledge responsibility. It's just a myth. But the practices associated
with this belief are extremely physical. Capitalist society today exists in the practice that

emerges from these beliefs.

Danuma 4

This time our discussion of knowledge is focused on explaining the relationship between

knowledge and the world. Every knowledge system seeks to explain the world with

knowledge. That is, knowledge can be compared to the world. According to us, the world and

knowledge are incompatible. Knowledge is the fiction we create to represent the world.

For example, suppose we enter a hotel for a cup of tea. After we pay at the counter, the cashier

gives us a shaped piece of plastic or a tonic cap (tea bottle cap).

But there is no connection between tonic caps and tea. If we compare it to knowledge, there is

no connection between knowledge and the world and only a symbolic system that we use to

represent the world. We have created agreements in that regard.

Thus we say that the world itself cannot be represented by human knowledge as stated in

Soviet Marxism. The notion that knowledge relative to today will develop tomorrow and that

past knowledge is far from the truth and modern knowledge is very close to the truth is wrong.

Many who claim to be the ultimate in knowledge say that it was updated by Newton's real

Einstein and further developed by quantum physics. It also argues that none of that knowledge

is wrong and that it is correct relative to the time it was published.

But according to us they are fictional models created and not something related to the real

world. Growing knowledge means that knowledge becomes more complex.

In other words, as knowledge develops, words / concepts become more abundant and

complex. And to organize words and concepts more and more logically. For example, even

someone with a simple scientific knowledge of Newton's gravity can understand Einstein's

theory of relativity or quantum physics.

One might ask, 'Is the real world a myth?' No. The real world is not a myth. But all the

knowledge systems we create about the real world are fictional. Knowledge and the real world

cannot coincide.

There is a definite contradiction between the real world and knowledge. Another view is that

some knowledge is close to reality and some is far from real. But knowledge is always at a

constant distance. It can't really get close or get too far.

Many, on the other hand, view the idea that the world cannot be understood by knowledge as

agnosticism. But whatever nomenclature it may be, the world cannot be represented in words

by our knowledge and concept. The truth is that the world is something that cannot be

represented by our knowledge.