HPIN RELIABILITY
HEINZ P. BLOCH, RELIABILITY/EQUIPMENT EDITOR
cn
Repetitive pump seal failures can cause disasters
Release No. 2004-08-I-NM (hup://www.csb.gov), issued in
‘October 2005 by the US Chemical Safety and Hazard Investign-
tion Board, addresses an ineidene at an oil refinery with « history
of repeated pump failures. Located in New Mexico, this fcilin’s
toralof three primary. electric and steam-diven spare iso-seripper
recirculation pumps had 23 wark orders submitted (Table 1) for
repair of seal-related problems or pump seiaures in the one-year
petiod prior to a fire and explosion, The catastrophic incident
occurred during disassembly on April 8, 2004 and caused over $13
million in damage. AC lest six people were injured and production
at this alkylation unit was shut down for months.
Lessons for those willing to learn. For many decades,
truly reliability-Focused organizations have avoided repeat seal
failures by insisting on understanding and eliminating failure
ses. They realize that collecting only the generalized failure
descriptions of Table 1 would be analogous toa trucking company
cataloguing repeated nonperformanceas “engine problems” More
detail would be needed to implement sound remedial action,
The reliability-focused also realize that when a seal failure
combines with one or more other deviations from the norm,
disasters result. More specifically, they make it their business «0
‘TABLE 1. Pump work orders
Sequence / date <> pur olen
01. Api 17,2003 <> P-5A (Eke). Seal ak
TZ Mf 9, 008 SS PS BAM oon PUMP Spraying fom seal —
know what fi-for-service mechanical sels are available. But, of
course, these components have to be properly installed and will
tsually requite « pump-around circuit and dual seals, generically
depicted in Fig. 1, that include a conservatively designed wide
dlearance pumping sing
‘We should remind ourselves ofa key requirement of API 682/3rd
Edition: Mechanical seals installed in refinery equipment should
have a design life of 25,000 hours. Clearly, the mechanical seals in
this particular installation fll far short ofthat requirement.
Icishard to comprehend that an organization would tolerate 23
«costly pump interventions without insisting on solid answers and
remedies long beforean inevitable catastrophic event occurs. Issues
tno doubt sarc with inadequate experience duting the purchasing
stage. Afier installation, it takes well-trained, motivated mechani-
cal engineers to correctly diagnose seal failures and find the true
tepeat failures, Don't employ the nonteachable and do develop an
intense dislike for repeat failures. Be determined to reward manag,
«rs and hourly employees who eradicate repeat pump failure.
Finally, consider insticuting a new regime by valuing, develop-
ing and promoting competent leaders instead of favoring chose
who can fabricate a profit margin in che next quarter, Understand
that house-of sand next-quarter profits are crumbling at random,
‘whereas house-of-brick organizations have few surprises and will
keep standing.
Unless the root cause is determined, there will be
“The author is}? Equpment/telabity Edo. practong consulting engineer
By BOT FA Ec) Refs We on skreaas y mpm ad attr or osres
Terie 9, 705 & PB SIM Repo seal — nls Mt Bloch as uted a authowd 17 tatboks en ache) Way
Emin Sheet apr seal~ _moroverentandove 70 paper or ares cing vith aed sets
i tre 16,2003 > FHA Ec} ep al
Trane 70,209 FSA Ec) = Fepaced sea t
Be hay 3,208 S PSA ech Replaced ea
5 Aust 2, 2005 PSB Bim) mn Sea ak
TO Aaget 25,2000 > PD Bi) Tepleced sea
Tr September 25,2003 < PB tm. eplced eal
12 Seheber26 2001 FSA Elec Tepes
13. Ocober 142003 < PSA Elec} Sear
Ta Deere 2007 = PSACEec) Teplced sel
15, Decor, 2003 <> PS Sm = Seal ea
16: Deonber 8 2003 PSA ech Seale
TH December 15, 2003 <> PSB GUM ern nvnee RRC Seal
TB December 152003 = PA Elec) : Seal leak
19-January 26,2004 = PSA Elec). Seal leak
BO. Mrch 22, 008 = PR lee] rn SOOTEGK
2iApil 1, 2008 <> PSK (Ee) Purp sel eaking
TE Ap 3.2008 25 PSR (Bochner Pump eel king
BB. Api 7, 2008