Hi Group 2 Ito ung sa atin 

sa part na application which is Yung topic natin or ung picture na

naka assign satin is about sa Re-Imposing The death penalty for heinous crime!💚

Application:
Issue SHAI : 

➡️The issue is all about The Re-Imposing the death penalty for heinous
crime.

Problem LEIZL :
statement
➡️The death penalty, or “capital punishment” is the planned killing of an
individual by a government or ruling entity in response to a crime. It is
considered the just punishment for a person legally convicted of an action
which is deemed a safety threat to society.

➡️In Malacañang, Manila, Philippines, April 3 2020. The plummeting human

rights situation issue in the Philippines got worse as the government began
considering bills to reinstate the death penalty and many Filipinos we're
debating In the said issue whether the death penalty is a moral issue for
some and a policy issue for others. 

Possible CAILO :
solutions
➡️An effective alternative to Death Penalty is life imprisonment. This
includes Imprisonment until the natural death of a convict, with no possibility
of release, this is sometimes called life without parole 

➡️Life without parole is a sensible alternative to the death penalty. A

sentence of life without parole means exactly what it says—those convicted
of crimes are locked away in prison for the rest of their lives.

Evidence to LEIZL:
support the
solution DEATH PENALTY IS FAR MORE EXPENSIVE THAN EXPECTED.
➡️The death penalty is far more expensive than a system         utilizing life-
without-parole sentences as an alternative  punishment, It is far more costly
to execute someone convicted than it is to sentence that person to life
imprisonment without possibility of parole.

➡️Many people assume that the state saves money by employing the death
penalty since an executed person no longer requires confinement, health
care, and related expenses. But in the modern application of capital
punishment, that assumption has been proven wrong.
Some of the reasons for the high cost of the death penalty are the longer
trials and appeals required when a person’s life is on the line, the need for
more lawyers and experts on both sides of the case, and the relative rarity
of executions. 
 DEATH PENALTY DOES NOT MAKE US SAFER.
➡️Study after study has shown that the death penalty does not deter crime. 
And states without the death penalty have much lower murder rates. Like
for example the South accounts for 80% of U.S. executions but has the
highest regional murder rate.

THE DEATH PENALTY IS UNFAIR.                                                        

➡️Because of the high cost of seeking the death penalty, prosecutors in
various countries differ widely on whether to seek it.  So an individual’s
likelihood of being sentenced to die depends on where his or her crime was
committed.
And once a death sentence is imposed, the most likely outcome of the case
is that the conviction or death sentence will be overturned in the courts.
Most defendants who are sentenced to death essentially end up spending
life in prison, but at a highly inflated cost because the death penalty was
involved in the process.

 "CAILO" : 

➡️And once a death sentence is imposed, the most likely outcome of the
case is that the conviction or death sentence will be overturned in the
courts. Most defendants who are sentenced to death essentially end up
spending life in prison, but at a highly inflated cost because the death
penalty was involved in the process.

THE DEATH PENALTY IS SEEMINGLY RACIST

➡️The death penalty has long come under scrutiny for being racially biased.
Earlier in the twentieth century when it was applied for the crime of rape, 89
percent of the executions involved black and brown defendants, most for
the rape of a white woman. In the modern era, when executions have been
carried out exclusively for murder, 75 percent of the cases involve the
murder of white victims, even though blacks, browns and whites are about
equally likely to be victims of murder.

➡️The death penalty is also racially biased. Many country prosecutors have
sought death sentences almost three times as often if one or more of the
victims was white.

➡️A bias towards white-victim cases has been found in almost all of the
sophisticated studies exploring this area over many years. These studies
typically control for other variables in the cases studied, such as the number
of victims or the brutality of the crime, and still found that defendants were
more likely to be sentenced to death if they killed a white person

Specific steps SHAI:

that needs to
be done to ➡️Strong public support for the death penalty often goes hand in hand with
achieve the a lack of reliable information about it – most often the mistaken belief that it
solution will reduce crime. Many governments are quick to promote this erroneous
belief even though there is no evidence to support it. Crucial factors that
underlie how the death penalty is applied are often not understood. These
include the risk of executing an innocent person, the unfairness of trials, and
the discriminatory nature of the death penalty – all of which contribute to a
fully informed view of capital punishment.

➡️In our opinion as a group, The specific steps that needed to be done to
solve this global problem is to promote the Anti- Death penalty program as
much as possible to it's extent, We believe that even the government is not
open about this information, atleast the people inside the society or
community(The open-minded one) slowly or step by step needed to
promote respect for human rights through public education programmes,
any social media platform and etc. In that way people around the globe will
open their mind towards this issue, change their perspective and that's the
start of the bigger step to take.