Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sixth Edition
Prepared by:
1
Chapter 1
Introduction to Criminological Theory
Terms
Causality. A concept more applicable to the hard sciences. Does the appearance of X
cause effect Y? In a perfect relationship, the appearance of X would always cause the
effect Y each and every time the relationship is seen.
Empirical Validity. This is the most important factor in evaluating a theory, and means
that the theory has been supported by research evidence.
Ideology. A belief system and a set of core values or philosophy. In a pure sense, an
ideology states or explains how things should be, and a theory explains how things
actually are.
Macro. Macro theories of criminal behavior explain the “big picture” of crime—crime
across the world or across a society. They attempt to answer why there are variations in
group rates of crime. Other authors have used the terms “epidemiology” or social
structural theories.
Parsimony. This refers to how many propositions, steps, or statements are involved.
How simple is the theory?
Policy Implications. If the theory is empirically valid, what solutions are suggested.
Scope. Refers to how much or how many types of crime or deviance the theory covers.
Soft Determinism. The view that human behavior is not wholly caused, determined, or
2
predictable by any set of biological, psychological, or sociological forces but that these
interact with exercise of choice and will by individuals. Therefore, explaining or
predicting human behavior is difficult.
Tautology. Circular reasoning. If a theory states that greed causes people to commit
crime, and then says we know Jon is greedy because he committed a crime, it becomes
impossible to subject the theory to the scientific process. In this case, you would find that
greed has been defined as someone who commits criminal acts. The circle of the
reasoning never stops.
Theories of Law and Criminal Justice. Theories in this category attempt to explain
how laws are made, and how the criminal justice system operates as a whole.
Usefulness. This refers to the real-world applications that the theory proposes or
suggests, and the ability to implement those applications.
Key Concepts
1. Theories are useful tools that help us to understand and explain the world around us.
In criminology, they help us to understand the workings of the criminal justice system
and the actors in the system.
2. Theories suggest the way things are, not the way things ought to be. They are not
inherently good or bad; however, they can be used for good or bad purposes.
3. A theory can try to explain crime for a large social unit or area (macro), or it can
attempt to explain crime at the individual or smaller unit level (micro).
4. Because we are dealing with human behavior, the social sciences will never be like
the hard sciences. In the hard sciences, the theory of relativity will not change. In the
social sciences, however, we deal with probabilities. The social scientist will say
things such as, “A severely neglected child will probably commit, or tend to commit,
delinquent acts.”
3
met these basic goals, the theory must then have some real world applications and
policy implications.
6. Many theories have common traits, but differences among them still exist.
Understanding these differences is key to understanding the often contradictory views
of crime and deviance they purport to explain.
Chapter Review
The goal of criminological theory is to help one gain an understating of crime and
criminal justice. Theories cover the making and the breaking of the law, criminal and
deviant behavior, as well as patterns of criminal activity. Individual theories may be
either macro or micro. Theories can be used to guide policy making, and can be
evaluated on a number of criteria including: clarity, scope, parsimony, testability,
practical usefulness, and empirical validity.
Questions
1. Before you began reading this book, what was your personal theory of crime
causation? Which of the theories introduced in this chapter came closest to your
personal view?
2. If any given theory were able to explain 30 percent of all the crimes committed,
would you consider that theory to be successful? Why or why not?
3. If you were a warden at a state prison, how effective must a theory of rehabilitation
be before you would implement it in your institution? Policy application of Theory A
has yielded modest results in preventing crime with low costs to implement. Policy
application of Theory B has yielded a high success rate at preventing crime with very
high costs to implement. Which theory would you prefer and why?
4
Chapter 2
Deterrence and Rational Choice Theories
Terms
Absolute Deterrence. This refers to the amount of crime that has been prevented
simply due to the fact that a formal system is in place so that an individual could be
legally punished for committing a criminal act.
Boot Camps. Programs used in place of incarceration, and based upon a military
model of discipline and order. These programs are designed to have a deterrent effect
on young offenders, but they have generally failed to yield long-term reductions in
recidivism.
Celerity. One of the three elements of deterrence. Celerity refers to how quickly an
individual is punished after committing a crime.
Certainty. One of the three elements of deterrence. Certainty refers to how likely it is
that an individual will be caught and punished for a crime that he or she has committed.
Certainty is the most important of the three elements.
Classical Criminology. A school of thought based upon utilitarian notions of free will
and the greatest good for the greatest number. At its core, classical criminology refers
to a belief that a crime is committed after an individual weighs the pros and cons. The
decision to commit a crime is a rational decision, and is best countered through a
deterrence-based system.
Deterrence Theory. A core principle of classical school and rational choice theories.
This theory states that crime can be controlled through the use of punishments that
combine the proper degrees of certainty, severity, and celerity. Deterrence is a key
element in the U.S. justice system.
Expected Utility Principle. Economic theory which states that people will act in a
manner that increases their benefits and reduces their losses. This ties in closely with
classical criminology and, by definition, rational choice theory, where people seek to
increase their pleasure and reduce their pain.
5
Free Will. The belief that humans are rational, and have the ability to make decisions
according to each individual’s own will and purposes. Under this perspective, people
can understand the difference between right and wrong, and can choose to commit
criminal acts or to follow the law. In later chapters, this view will be contrasted with
views that claim that crime is a result of biological, psychological, or social forces
beyond an individual’s control.
Rational Choice Theory. This is the 1980s formulation of classical criminology. While
the beliefs of rational choice theory can be traced back to eighteenth-century
philosopher Cesare Beccaria, this version adds a new dimension that emphasizes the
expanding role of the economist in criminological thought. The emphasis is placed on
the expected reward for committing a crime, and other associated costs and benefits
surrounding criminal activity.
Retribution. Making the punishment fit the crime. Also referred to as “an eye for an
eye.”
Routine Activities Theory. This theory states that for crime to be committed, three
elements must be present: an available target, a motivated offender, and a lack of
guardians.
Scared Straight. This program began in the 1970s with the belief that taking young
offenders or potential offenders to a prison environment, and exposing them to the
realities of prison life, could prove beneficial in reducing delinquency. Like boot camps,
however, Scared Straight did not produce the expected results.
Severity. One of the three elements of deterrence. Severity refers to how harsh the
punishment for a crime will be. In classical criminology, it is important to remember
that a punishment must fit the crime. If a punishment is not severe enough, it will not
deter crime. If it is too severe, it is unjust and can lead to more crime.
Specific Deterrence. This style of deterrence is used with a specific offender in mind.
The belief is that if an individual is punished for a criminal act, then that individual will
6
be less likely to violate the law in the future.
Key Concepts
2. The operation of the current criminal justice system relies on the classical
criminological perspective. The Classical School is reflected in both the Declaration
of Independence and the United States Constitution.
3. Classical school theories operate from a perspective of choice. The assumption is that
individuals have the ability to make a rational choice to either follow the law, or to
violate it. A system of punishments is necessary to deter individuals from committing
criminal acts. Committing criminal acts brings a certain amount of pleasure to the
individual. To counteract this pleasure, punishments must be provided that carry with
them enough pain to outweigh the pleasure received by committing a deviant or
criminal act.
5. Various programs have been tried around the country using deterrence and choice as
primary elements. Programs such as Scared Straight have attempted to use fear and
deterrence to keep young offenders from committing additional crimes. Boot camps
have attempted to use fear, discipline, and brief incarceration to keep offenders from
committing additional crimes. These types of programs are controversial, and have
yielded mixed results at best.
7
Chapter Review
Deterrence theory states that if punishment is certain, severe, and swift, then people
will refrain from committing criminal acts. Deterrence theory is at the core of the
criminal justice system, and the basis for most of strict punishments and long prisons
sentences. Is deterrence theory empirically valid, however? That is a difficult
question to answer. Studies have found mixed support for deterrence theory.
Modifications like rational choice and routine activity theory have found mixed
support as well.
Questions
1. Certainty, severity, and celerity are the key elements of deterrence theory. What
makes certainty so important? Could we not reduce crime by making the punishment
so severe that a “rational” individual would be scared to death to commit criminal
acts?
2. Programs such as Scared Straight and boot camps are controversial, and may not
yield long-term reductions in recidivism. They are, however, cheap and easy to
operate. In this case, should cost considerations and the fact that these programs may
help a few individuals justify the continuation of these programs?
3. Routine activity theories look at people, both offenders and victims, and their
routines. As a result, some of the blame in a criminal incident may be placed on the
victim. Is that fair? Is a victim ever responsible, or partly responsible, for his or her
own victimization?
5. Classical school criminology relies heavily on the concept of free will. How can one
ever demonstrate empirically the existence of a free will?
6. How has the recent research on the effects of specific deterrence verses perceptual
deterrence changed the way the entire concept of deterrence is viewed? What
additional studies should be conducted to clarify the issue?
Notable Individuals
8
Cohen, Lawrence E.: Collaborated with Marcus Felson in developing the routine
activities theory.
Felson, Marcus: Collaborated with Lawrence Cohen in developing the routine activities
theory.
9
Chapter 3
Biological and Biosocial Theories
Terms
Adoption Studies. Studies that have been done with children reared by biological
parents compared to their siblings or twins reared by adoptive parents in an attempt
to demonstrate a genetic link to criminal behavior. Results have been mixed.
Autonomic Nervous System (ANS). Mednick’s theory that individuals who inherit a
slower than normal autonomic nervous system learn to control aggressive or antisocial
behavior slowly or not at all. This leads to increased violence and criminal activity.
Biosocial Theories. Theories that examine the combined effects of biology, behavior,
and the environment on criminal behavior.
Biosocial Arousal Theory. This theory states that an individual’s level of arousal
works in conjunction with the social environment. Those with low levels of arousal are
less likely to learn appropriate ways to deal with aggression and violence and thus are
more prone to commit crime.
Born Criminal. One of three criminal types identified by Lombroso. This type of
criminal is the most dangerous, and can be identified through his or her stigmata or
identifying characteristics.
10
may be part of the equation. This assumes that behavior is not completely and strictly
determined by the individual’s genetic or biological makeup.
Evolutionary Theory. A broad-based view that certain types of criminal behavior are
genetic and passed down from one generation to the next through evolutionary processes
of natural selection and survival.
Gene-Based Evolutionary Theory. A general approach that suggests that the process of
natural selection has resulted in criminal genetic tendencies that are passed down from
generation to generation.
Insane Criminal. One of three criminal types identified by Lombroso. The insane
criminal type includes idiots, imbeciles, epileptics, psychotics, and the mentally unstable.
These criminals are unable to control their actions; however, they do not possess the
stigmata or identifying characteristics of the born criminal.
Stigmata. Characteristics claimed by Lombroso that could be used to identify the “born
criminal.” They include things such as extra fingers or toes, large lips, receding chins,
excessive skin wrinkles, and large monkey-like ears.
Key Concepts
1. The fundamental concept behind the early biological theories was the belief that
individual difference could be scientifically measured.
2. Early biological theories view criminal behavior as the result of a defect in the
individual. This defect can be biological or genetic in nature, and serves to separate
the criminal from the law-abiding citizen. Contemporary biological theories
concentrate more on variations in genetic and other biological factors in interaction
with the environment, and are less likely to refer to biological defects or
abnormalities.
4. Although early biological theories lacked validity, they were among the first to use
the scientific method. The process of measuring body parts, shapes, and sizes
(although flawed) represented a dramatic shift from the philosophical approach
offered by the classical school.
11
5. Biological theories trace back to Lombroso, and vary in the amount of determinism
built in. Atavistic man or the “born criminal” was always going to be at odds with
civilized society. More modern biological theories seek to establish a link between
things like IQ, testosterone, and criminality. While they share a biological link,
modern theories understand that the influences of choice and the larger society also
play a role in the crime dynamic.
6. If traditional biological theories are correct, then society is limited in its responses to
offenders. There are five basic responses. First, we could try to fix the offender.
This may be accomplished through medication, treatment, or therapy. Second, we
could lock the offender up and keep him or her physically separated from larger
society. Third, we could sterilize the offender. This would keep individuals from
passing along defective genes to future generations. Fourth, we could deport or
banish the offender. Finally, we could choose to kill the offender. If crime is truly
biologically determined, these options, or close derivatives of these options, would
prove more useful than any punishment designed to remove the pleasure from a
criminal act.
7. More recent biological or biosocial theories believe that even if some biological traits
are passed down that would make an individual more predisposed to commit criminal
acts, these traits can be dealt with through effective social programs. Having a
biological trait, then, is not the end of the story. It does not doom one to a life of
crime, and can in fact be dealt with and managed.
Chapter 1 introduced the basic vocabulary and rules necessary to understand crime
from a criminological point of view. Understanding the terms and rules is necessary
to go beyond a “commonsense” understanding of criminal and deviant activity.
Theories of the causes of crime and deviance fall on a continuum from a “micro”
focus on the characteristics of individuals to a “macro” focus on the characteristics
of the larger society.
Questions
1. Things like eye color, hair color, facial features, and personality are passed down
from generation to generation. If this is true, why would we not expect things like
criminal behavior to be passed down as well?
2. It is well established that inmates as a population have a lower IQ than people in the
rest of society. Does this fact prove a genetic or biological link in understanding
crime?
3. What have we learned about biology and crime from adoption and twin studies?
Should these studies be replicated and improved upon today?
4. Should scientists continue looking for biological causes of criminality? Could such
research be attacked on grounds that it promotes racist, sexist, or class-based
stereotypes?
5. How should history judge the work of Lombroso? Is it fair to use standards from
2012 to judge the work he did in 1876?
6. Compare and contrast the views of the traditional biological theories to the modern
biosocial theories.
Notable Individuals
Goring, Charles: (1870–1919) British criminologist, proposed the idea that criminals
are shorter, weigh less, and “mentally defective,” wrote The English Convict: A
Statistical Study (1913).
Mednick, Sarnoff: Developed the best-known and most systematically stated and
tested modern biosocial theory.
13
Chapter 4
Psychological Theories
Terms
Ego. One of the three components of Freudian personality development. The ego is
referred to as the executive or rational part of the personality, and it acts to keep the id
in check.
Electra Complex. This occurs at the beginning of the phallic stage (around ages 3 to 6)
in which a girl develops a desire to possess her father and a hatred and fear of her mother.
Freudian. This view of behavior focuses on early childhood development. It claims that
criminal activity is the result of a conflict between the id, ego, and superego, which can
be traced back to a conflict in early childhood.
Oedipus Complex. This occurs at the beginning of the phallic stage (around ages 3
to 6) in which a boy develops a desire to possess his mother and a hatred and fear of
his father.
Personality Theory. This theory believes that criminal activity is the result of a
defective, deviant, or inadequate personality. Examples of deviant personality traits
include hostility, impulsiveness, aggression, and sensation-seeking.
14
Psychopathic. A general term referring to a variety of antisocial personality disorders.
Key Concepts
3. Under both of these approaches, the criminal act is not important, in that it is only one
of many symptoms of the underlying psychological or personality disorder. Both
approaches recommend various forms of therapy and treatment to fix the disorder.
When the underlying psychological or personality disorder is addressed, the criminal
and deviant acts should cease.
4. Psychological theories are difficult if not impossible to test. One cannot see, identify,
or measure the id, ego, or superego. As a result, testing these theories becomes
virtually impossible. Similar difficulties are faced when trying to test personality
theories, and tautological issues remain a problem.
5. Programs that offer therapy and counseling in attempts to reduce delinquency have
not been shown to be particularly effective. While the role of psychology in criminal
justice and criminology is indeed important, we have not yet reached a place where
the key concepts of psychological and personality theories, along with their
recommended treatments, have had a measured impact on criminal activity.
Chapters 2, 3, and 4 all focus on characteristics and processes within the individual
that produce individual criminal behavior. In Chapter 4, crime is viewed not as a
choice or a biological defect, but rather as a problem deep in the offender’s mind.
Problems in early childhood development, or in the personality of the offender, are
viewed as responsible for deviant activity. Criminal activity is seen not as the core
problem, but rather as a symptom of the underlying mental issue. According to this
theory, crime and deviant activity can be prevented through counseling, treatment, or
modification of an individual’s personality. Indeed, this approach is used most often
in the juvenile justice system, but the results of this technique cast doubt on the ability
15
of counseling alone to reduce criminal activity. It is also doubted that the true
psychopath can benefit from any type of counseling or treatment.
Questions
1. What impact does Freudian theory have on the criminal justice system today?
2. If psychological theories have validity problems, why are psychiatrists so often called
upon to testify in court? If the theories are so tautological, how can we ever be sure a
person is truly insane?
4. What can be learned from projects like the Wayne County Clinic and the Cambridge-
Somerville Youth Study?
5. How would you develop a long-term psychiatric treatment program for delinquent or
antisocial boys? Would the program differ for delinquent or antisocial girls?
Notable Individuals
16
Chapter 5
Social Learning Theory
Terms
Behavior Theory. Burgess and Akers expanded differential association and included
elements of behavior theory and behavior modification. This expansion allowed them to
identify the learning process, and included elements such as operant behavior, respondent
conditioning, discriminative stimuli, and schedules of reinforcement.
Definitions. One of the four main concepts of Akers’s social learning theory. The process
through which an individual rationalizes, evaluates, and assigns right and wrong.
Definitions of the law may be general or specific. One may have the general view that the
law needs to be obeyed, but a specific view that a 20-year-old who can fight in a war
should be allowed to drink a beer. This person may follow the law in general, but violate
the liquor law.
Differential Reinforcement. One of the four main concepts of Akers’s social learning
theory. The concept refers to the potential rewards and punishments for committing or
not committing a criminal or deviant act. This process includes a consideration of
punishments and rewards that have been received in the past, as well as present and
future rewards and punishments.
Imitation. One of the four main concepts of Akers’s social learning theory. Behavior
modeled by others for an individual may be copied by that individual. Impressions of the
individual doing the modeling, along with perceived risks and rewards, will factor into
the imitation decision.
Operant Conditioning. The view that voluntary actions and decisions made by an
17
individual are influenced and shaped by punishments and rewards found in the external
world.
Social Learning Theory. In general, social learning theory proposes that both criminal
and conforming behaviors are acquired, maintained, or changed by the same process of
interaction with others. The difference lies in the conforming or deviant direction or
balance of the social influences such as reinforcement, values and attitudes, and
imitation.
Key Concepts
1. As a general concept, social learning theory has been applied to the fields of
sociology, psychology, criminal justice, and criminology in an attempt to explain how
criminal values, ideas, techniques, and expressions are transmitted from one
individual to another.
3. Akers identified four dimensions of the social structure that can possibly be integrated
with social learning: differential social organization, differential location in the social
18
structure, theoretically defined structural variables, and differential social location.
If crime is not the result of choice, biology, or psychology, then how can it be
explained? The theorists in Chapter 5 believe that crime is learned through interaction
with others in one’s social environment. Social learning theorists of criminology state
that criminal behavior, like other behaviors in life, are a learned activity. Social
learning theorists seek to understand and explain how a person learns to become
criminal, and then to develop strategies and programs that model appropriate
behavior.
Questions
1. Can any present-day policy implications be drawn from the Highfields project or the
Provo experiments?
2. Although it has been demonstrated that diversion programs have had moderate
success, creating a “positive peer culture” to prevent delinquency has disadvantages.
What disadvantages come from using positive peer culture techniques, and why?
4. What programs are the most effective in preventing delinquency—those that aim at
juvenile delinquency, or those that involve children and their families (regardless of
delinquency status)?
6. Discuss the OSCL training program and how is has worked with foster parents and in
school activities.
Notable Individuals
19
Bandura, Albert: Psychologist and child development expert, examined stages of
development and concluded that conduct develops at particular stages when certain
interaction stimuli are present.
20
Chapter 6
Social Bonding and Control Theories
Terms
Containment Theory. A control theory in which the inner and outer pushes and
pulls on an individual will produce delinquency unless they are constrained or
counteracted by inner and outer containment measures.
Control Theories. A classification of theories that claim to ask not why do people
commit criminal acts, but why do they not commit criminal acts? These theories assume
everyone has the desire to commit criminal and deviant acts, and seeks to answer why
some people refrain from doing so.
Drift Theory. This theory states that people can “drift” or float back and forth between
obeying and breaking the law. People can use techniques of neutralization as excuses to
break the law when other forms of social control are weak. When social control is
stronger, the offender will drift or float back to law-abiding behavior.
External Control. A concept in control theory in which agents outside the control of
the individual are responsible for keeping that individual from committing criminal or
deviant acts. These agents include parents, teachers, or members of law enforcement.
Internal Control. A concept in control theory that explains why a person will not
commit a criminal act by reference to the person internally monitoring and controlling
his or her own behavior. This includes such things as feelings of guilt and not wanting
to disappoint others.
Natural Motivation. This refers to the belief in control theories that the desire to
commit criminal acts is uniform and spread evenly across society.
Social Bonding Theory. A control theory that states that individuals will commit
criminal or delinquent acts when their ties (bonds) to society are weakened or have
broken. There are four types of bonds: attachment, commitment, involvement, and belief.
When the bonds are strong, an individual will refrain from criminal activity.
Social Control. Under a control theory perspective, social control refers to those
elements that keep an individual from committing a criminal or deviant act. Examples
21
include the family, church, and school.
Key Concepts
2. Travis Hirschi’s theory has many policy implications and can be used to reduce
delinquency. His theory can be seen in policies such as curfew laws, after-school
programs, parenting classes, and job placement programs.
4. The Social Development Model (SDM) has supported bonding and learning theories
and has demonstrated success in areas of commitment and attachment.
Why is a person not a criminal? That is the central question asked by control
theorists. Instead of asking why people break the law, this perspective wants to know
why people do not break the law. Instead of focusing on choice, body type, the mind,
or the learning process, control theorists look at how people are controlled by society.
Has the individual bonded with society, and if so, how strong are those bonds? This
perspective seeks the same basic answers to the crime problem, but asks a slightly
different question. Weak to moderate support has been found for control and self-
control theories.
Questions
1. Identify Hirschi’s four elements of social bonding. How does his social bonding
theory differ from his self-control theory?
2. Assuming Walter Reckless’s containment theory is true, does the uniform policy in
public schools alleviate some pressure that “pushes” youth toward delinquency?
3. Explain the similarities between Reiss’s and Nye’s ideas of social control.
4. Belief is a component of the social bonding theory. Could the increase in juvenile
delinquency be attributed to the religious policy in public school?
5. If juveniles conform to norms of the culture and are still labeled delinquent, is there
an explanation or excuse for their behavior?
6. Discuss the revisions to the definition of self-control made by Hirschi. Discuss the
new definition, and explain whether or not it addresses the tautology problem
associated with the theory of low self-control.
22
7. Does an individual’s self-control remain stable, or does it change over time? How
does the answer to this question affect the theory itself, as well as any policy
implications?
Notable Individuals
Hirschi, Travis: Criminologist, developed the social bond theory, wrote The
Causes of Delinquency (1969), coauthored A General Theory of Crime (1990) with
Michael Gottfredson.
Nye, F. Ivan: Wrote Family Relationships and Delinquent Behavior (1958), expanding
on Reiss’s definitions of social controls.
Reiss, Albert J.: In 1951, identified delinquency as resulting from the failure of
“personal” and “social” controls.
Sykes, Gresham: Collaborated with David Matza in 1957 and proposed “techniques of
neutralization.”
23
Chapter 7
Labeling and Reintegrative Shaming Theory
Terms
Diversion Movement. This refers to all those efforts to divert individuals, primarily
youth but also adults who are suspected of or have been charged with minor offenses,
from the full and formal process of the juvenile or adult justice system. The intent is to
reduce the stigma of formal delinquent or criminal labels on the individuals and to reduce
or avoid the costs of formal processing of the crime.
Faith-Based Programs. These are religiously based programs which can be operated
within the institution or the larger community. They can be run by inmates or religious
leaders, and use spiritual beliefs and values to change offenders’ attitudes and behaviors.
Labeling Theory. The theory that the formal and informal application of
stigmatizing and deviant “labels” or tags applied to an individual by society will not
deter, but rather instigate future deviant or criminal acts.
Net-Widening. A problem that occurs when offenders who would have been released
from the system are placed in a program simply because a program exists. This often
occurs in diversion programs. Boot camps may be a viable option to keep kids out of
institutions, but it becomes net-widening when kids, who otherwise would have been
sent home, are sent to boot camps.
Primary Deviance. Deviant acts that are committed in the absence of or preceding the
24
application of a deviant label for the acts. While it may or may not be the first crime a
person has committed, it is not based on a response to being labeled as a deviant (see also
Secondary Deviance).
Radical Non-Intervention. The belief that it is better to simply tolerate minor offenses
rather than risk labeling the offender.
Restorative Justice. This refers to programs which are designed to make offenders take
responsibility for their actions and restore them and their victims, as much as possible,
back to things as they existed before the offense. Often offenders will apologize to the
victims and to the community, and attempt to financially compensate the victims for their
losses.
Secondary Deviance. Criminal or deviant acts that are committed in response to, or
because of, a label that has been applied to an individual.
Key Concepts
2. Labeling theory treats such labels as both cause and effect, as independent and
dependent variables.
5. Labeling theory mirrors conflict theory in that the individuals with power create and
enforce rules at the expense of the less powerful.
What happens once a child has been labeled a trouble maker, or a young man labeled
a thief? This is the primary concern of the labeling theorist. The key difference
between labeling theory and the other theories examined so far is this: Labeling
theory makes no attempt to understand why an individual committed a crime in the
first place. The labeling theorist wants to understand what happens after an individual
25
is caught committing a crime and society attaches a label to the offender. This differs
from the view of choice, biological predisposition, psychological factors, social
learning factors, and societal bond and control theories, which seek to explain the first
and subsequent criminal acts. Little empirical support has been found for labeling
theory, and it has been criticized for failing to account not only for primary deviance,
but for the wide variety of other social factors that influence crime prior to, and after,
the application of any specific label.
Questions
4. Labeling theory seems to be common sense. What has the research shown about the
validity of labeling theory? How do you explain those results?
6. How are churches and community groups becoming involved in reintegration? How
could this benefit both victims and offenders?
Notable Individuals
Lemert, Edwin M.: Sociologist, collaborated with Howard Becker to extend the
labeling theory to include both primary and secondary deviance, wrote Social Pathology
(1951) and Human Deviance, Social Problems, and Social Control (1967).
26
Chapter 8
Terms
Chicago Area Projects. This was the first large-scale urban delinquency prevention
program. Started by Shaw and McKay in the 1930s, it used their social
disorganization theory as a core.
Collective Efficacy. This refers to the actual or perceived ability of the residents of a
given neighborhood to maintain informal social control over the criminal or deviant
behavior of other residents. This would have the effect of keeping crime rates lower.
Concentric Zone Theory. Refers to the work of Burgess. Looks at a city with the
graph of a target depicting a series of concentric zones. The zones and their occupants
are used to understand crime in a city.
Social Capital. This refers to investment in the community, and looks at things like
club and organization membership, volunteer activities, political activities, and general
community engagement.
Structural Theories. This refers to macro-level theories that account for differences
in crime rates across communities by looking at variations in structural characteristics
and conditions of each community.
Urban Ecology. A theory that views a city as analogous to the natural ecological
community of plants and animals. This relationship is understood through the use of
concentric zones that spread from the center to the outer regions of a city. This work
done by Park and Burgess influenced the social disorganization theory developed by
Shaw and McKay.
Key Concepts
2. The theory was developed by Shaw and McKay, who demonstrated that juvenile
27
offenders followed a very consistent pattern over several decades, with the highest
rates of deviance concentrated in the inner city and diminishing outward from the
core of the city.
3. This suggests that forces are at work beyond the individual delinquents. Those
larger forces may be found in the structure or organization of the city itself.
4. Factors in a city that have been examined by others include the poverty rate,
unemployment rate, percentage of female-headed households, percentage of those
under the age of 18, and various measures of community involvement.
Questions
1. Describe how the macro approach of social disorganization differs from a micro
approach of looking at an individual delinquent.
3. Could we solve the problem of social disorganization simply through investing large
sums of money in a community? Why or why not?
Notable Individuals
Shaw, Clifford R.: Sociologist, collaborated with McKay on the social disorganization
theory.
28
Chapter 9
Anomie and Strain Theories
Terms
Anomie. A state of normlessness or norm confusion within a society. The term was
coined by Durkheim to explain suicide in French society, and later applied by Merton
and others to other forms of deviance and crime in American society.
Aspirations and Expectations. This refers to anomie strain theory. Aspirations refer
to what one hopes to achieve in life, and expectations refer to what the individual
believes is realistic. The greater the difference between aspirations and expectations,
the more likely strain becomes.
Cohen’s Anomie Strain. This version of anomie theory examines juveniles. Though
Cohen is in agreement with Merton that blocked goals produce strain, his theory looks at
status as opposed to material gain. Under this perspective, juveniles are measured against
the standard of the middle class. Lower-class kids who cannot meet the middle-class
standards of dress, talk, and manners are, in a sense, deprived. This “status deprivation”
leads to “status frustration,” which in turn causes deviant and criminal acts. Instead of
five groups like Merton proposes, Cohen sees only one group—a conflict group that
values toughness, fighting, and respect.
Decommodification. The belief that a government can provide social welfare programs
to protect vulnerable members of society from market forces.
Differential Opportunity. A theory that draws from anomie and the work of Merton and
Cohen; the social disorganization theory of Shaw and McKay; and the differential
association theory of Sutherland. This view says that although one may be denied
legitimate opportunity, that does not mean that one has access to illegitimate opportunity.
Although deprivation and strain can and do play a role, one learns a good or bad response
to that strain depending on the available opportunities and role models, legitimate or
illegitimate. Three groups exist under this perspective: The first is criminal. In criminal
groups, juveniles are organized, and the primary goal of the activity is to make money. A
lack of legitimate means has been replaced by illegitimate ones, such as theft or extortion.
The second group is the conflict group. In this group, there are few legitimate or
illegitimate opportunities. These groups are found primarily in poor, socially
disorganized neighborhoods. As a result, toughness and fighting are the primary goals.
The final group is the retreatist. This group cannot fight well, or profit from their crimes.
They are the double failure.
Focal Concerns of the Lower-Class Culture. The list of focal concerns or values
believed to be prevalent among lower-class males was developed by Miller to describe
the behavior of street corner groups or gangs. According to Miller, the behavior of these
juveniles was an adaptation to lower-class culture. This culture valued things such as:
trouble, toughness, smartness, excitement, fatalism, and autonomy.
29
and confrontation with negative stimuli. Deviance is most likely to occur when the
response of the individual to any of these stressors is anger. Factors such as peer
associations, beliefs, attributions of causes, self-control, and self-efficacy will affect each
individual’s reaction to stress. Agnew also expands the concepts of strain to include not
only objective and subjective strains, but also vicarious and anticipated strains.
Institutional Anomie. This theory was created by Messner and Rosenfeld. The premise
of the theory is that American society is set up to give prestige and priority to economic
institutions. This means that the accumulation of wealth and individual success are
people’s highest priorities. Prioritizing economic institutions weakens the ability of other
social institutions (family, education, government) to control crime that occurs in
response to the lack of access to or failure in the economic sphere. Therefore, a high level
of criminal activity is a natural result of the setup of American society.
Merton’s Anomie Theory. This version of anomie theory looks at American society,
and what happens when an individual realizes that not everyone can achieve the
American dream of equal opportunity for economic success. When this happens, one of
five adaptations will occur. The conformist accepts the goals of society and the means
for achieving them: the college student. The innovator accepts the goals of society but
rejects the means of achieving them: the drug dealer. The mode of rebellion refers to
one who rejects both the goals and means of society, and wants to replace them with
new goals and means: the militia member. The retreatist gives up on both the goals and
means, and withdraws from society: the alcoholic. Finally, the ritualist rejects the goals
and accepts the means: this person has given up on the promotion, nice car, and so on,
and simply punches the time clock to keep what they have.
Key Concepts
1. Anomie was coined by the French sociologist Durkheim, and first applied to French
society to examine rates of suicide. The concept of anomie was first used in this
country by Merton, in an effort to describe adaptations in behavior and the interaction
between legitimate and illegitimate means.
2. Anomie may apply when there are not enough legitimate means to reach legitimate
societal goals. This can occur when society is in a state of disorder and disintegration,
as opposed to stability and integration.
3. Depending on the theorist, anomie has been applied to the acquisition of wealth, the
attainment of status, or the expression of cultural or class values.
4. Agnew’s revision of anomie strain theory examines several possible sources of strain
that may result in criminal activity: failure to achieve positively valued goals,
removal of positively valued stimuli, and confrontation with negative stimuli.
5. With mixed support, anomie strain theories have been used to develop projects
designed to bring stability and order to disorganized communities. The hope has been
that increasing the stability of the community, the schools, and the family would
reduce criminal and delinquent acts.
30
Chapter Review/Keeping Tabs
Some theorists believe that communities in a state of anomie, where the norms are
unclear or absent, produce conditions favorable to the proliferation of crime. In other
words, there has to be a way to achieve the goals universally sought after in a
society. If the goals remain, but there is no manner in which certain members of
society may achieve those goals, anomie may take effect. Society has laid out a
blueprint for success: If you play by the rules, you will succeed. This blueprint
explains the proper way to achieve this success. But what happens if everyone does
not have an equal opportunity to achieve the “American Dream”? According to
anomie/strain theorists, these blocked opportunities, and the strain associated with
them, can lead to criminal or deviant activity. Crime is committed as an effective but
illegitimate way to gain success. Anomie and strain have been used to discuss entire
societies in a macro approach, or groups of people in a micro approach.
Questions
1. Is the “American Dream” real? If so, has it gone through any changes in the last 50
years? Do you believe that Merton’s theory, especially the concept of the innovator,
adequately explains why a person drops out of school and sells drugs?
2. Which is more important in American society, money or status? Which theorist best
explains your answer?
3. Cohen described one group of delinquent kids, while Cloward and Ohlin described
three. Which do you believe would best describe kids today?
4. Was Miller right with his focus on lower-class kids and lower-class culture? Do these
distinct class cultures exist at all economic levels?
5. Agnew has advanced the anomie/strain theory with his general strain theory, but the
empirical evidence is mixed. Where should the anomie/strain concept go from here?
Can it be advanced even further?
Notable Individuals
Agnew, Robert: Sociologist, proposed the general strain theory to account for criminal
behavior.
Burgess, Ernest: (1886–1966) Helped form the “Chicago School,” collaborated with
Sutherland and Park.
McKay, Henry D.: Sociologist, collaborated with Shaw on the social disorganization
theory.
31
Merton, Robert K.: Focused on anomie and strain theory, wrote Social Theory and
Social Structure (1957).
Messner, Steven F.: Collaborated with Rosenfeld on the ideology of the “American
Dream” and institutional anomie theory.
32
Chapter 10
Conflict Theory
Terms
Conflict Theory. The view that society is divided into two or more groups with
competing ideas and values. The group(s) with the most power makes the laws and
controls society. Groups lacking the formal power to make the rules still maintain their
own group norms, and continue in their behavior, which is now viewed as criminal by the
larger society. This perspective explains both law and criminal justice (why some acts are
legally defined as criminal), as well as criminal and deviant behavior (why some
individuals commit acts defined as criminal).
Consensus Theory. In general, this theory states that laws are a result of, and a reflection
of, general agreement in society. Views of right and wrong, which can be reflected
through folkways and mores, influence the laws and rules that govern a society.
Functionalist Theory. Similar to consensus theory, but this theory also looks at how the
law acts to resolve everyday disputes in society, and how it acts to serve everyone, not
just the powerful. The law also serves a symbolic function and discourages deviant
behavior.
Interest Groups. These groups form and act in such a manner so as to influence the
political system in ways that will provide the greatest benefits to members of the
group. They are also referred to as pressure groups.
Law. Rules and regulations backed with the coercive power of the state. Depending
upon one’s view, law is either formed with the agreement of the majority of society and
designed to promote order, or formed by the powerful in society to keep control of the
masses.
Mechanical Solidarity. A type of less complex society where members share common
beliefs and values. In these societies, law is repressive and punitive.
Racial Profiling. Actions taken by the police based solely on the race of an individual.
Social Control. A normative system with rules concerning the way people should and
should not behave. This is combined with a formal and informal system to encourage and
33
promote conformity, while at the same time discouraging and punishing deviance.
Informal social control is exhibited by the family, church, and school, while formal
social control is exhibited by the police and the courts.
Social Threat Hypothesis. This hypothesis states that criminal and deviant acts will
increase as the number of people opposed to the interests of the powerful increases.
Key Concepts
1. Conflict theory proposes that the law and the criminal justice system primarily
embody the interests and norms of the most powerful groups in society, rather than
those of society as a whole.
2. Consensus theory explains the content and operation of the law by referring to a
broad-based agreement in society on social and moral norms within the society, and
the common interests of all elements of society.
3. Conflict and consensus theories imply support for fair representation of differing
interests and values and non-discrimination in the law and criminal justice system.
4. There are two forms of social control. Informal social control exists in families, peer
groups, churches, and in communities. When there is a breakdown of informal social
control, formal social control increases. Law is formal social control.
Law is the formal method of social control used by the criminal justice system to
punish offenders and maintain order in society, but where does the authority for law
stem from? The consensus perspective believes that law is formed as a result of a
general societal agreement on the basic social norms, morals, and common interests
necessary to operate society in a smooth and safe manner. The conflict perspective
believes that laws are formed to meet the needs and interests of the powerful in
society. The law and criminal justice system are then used to keep the powerful in
power. Those who commit criminal acts are simply conforming to the norms and
values expressed in the culture of the powerless, and are acting to fight the powerful.
This perspective differs from the others examined thus far in that it looks into law
formation. For the consensus theorist, the law is the glue that holds society together.
For the conflict theorist, the law is the club that keeps the powerless in line.
34
Questions
1. State two crimes that you think support the consensus theory. In other words, name
two laws that you think most people in society support.
2. State two crimes that you think support the conflict theory. In other words, name two
laws that you think have been passed to keep the rich and powerful in control of
society.
3. What does the empirical evidence say with regard to the way that the criminal justice
system operates? Does the evidence support the perspective that racism and sexism
blatantly infest the criminal justice system?
4. Assuming conflict theory is true, what kind of policy changes could be implemented
to reduce class inequality?
5. Will it ever be possible to achieve a true consensus in a country as large and diverse
as the United States?
6. Discuss the Steffensmeier et al. research on age, gender, race, ethnicity, and
sentencing outcomes. Which perspective do you believe this research supports? Will
all members of society see this research the same way?
Notable Individuals
Chambliss, William J.: Criminological and sociological theorist, coauthored Law,
Order, and Power (1971) with Robert Seidman (see Chapter 10).
Marx, Karl: European theorist whose view of the history of society as class struggle and
capitalism as a two-class system of the ruling elite and the proletariat inspired many
scholars and revolutionaries (see Chapter 10).
Turk, Austin T.: Sociologist and criminologist, has written extensively on the
conflict perspective, wrote Criminality and the Legal Order (1969).
Weber, Max: German sociologist, pioneered work on bureaucracy, law, and economy.
35
Chapter 11
Marxist Theories
Terms
Bourgeois. The ruling-class elite in a capitalist system; those with the power.
Instrumental Marxism. The political state (including the law and the criminal justice
system) is always and only a tool of the capitalist class to oppress the working class.
Marxist Theory. This theory explains both law and criminal justice, and focuses upon
the division between the ruling-class elite and the laborers. In a capitalist society, the
ruling-class elite (bourgeoisie) control the means of production, which allows them to
control the political state as well. They use this control to manipulate the laborers
(proletariat) and keep them in a position of powerlessness. The masses are thus controlled
both economically and legally.
Proletariat. The working class or laborers in a capitalist society; those with no power.
Key Concepts
1. Marxist theorists believe that capitalism is the cause of crime and delinquency.
2. The instrumental Marxist theorist believes that the entire system of capitalism serves
to benefit the ruling elite; while the structural Marxist believes that, at least in the
short term, the political state maintains some degree of independence from the ruling
elite.
3. The Marxist view states that crime is either committed by the ruling class to keep the
working class in place, or by the working class to strike out against the ruling class.
36
4. Marxist theory is unable to explain the level of power and control held by an elite few
in the former Soviet Union, as well as the rise and popularity of groups like the
Taliban in Afghanistan. The collapse of the government and the use of the law as a
weapon against the oppressed has been more evident in those societies than in the
United States.
In Marxist theory, the cause of crime is capitalism. The law and the criminal justice
system are used to protect the interests of the capitalist elite. In a capitalist system,
the means of production are owned by a small elite (bourgeoisie) and are used to
control the working-class laborers (proletariat). Instrumental Marxists view the
entire political state, to include the law and the criminal justice system as tools of the
ruling class. Structural Marxists believe that in the short run, the political state is
relatively independent and may reflect the interests of the working class. Crimes
committed by the bourgeoisie are crimes of domination and repression, and are
designed to keep the proletariat in place. Crimes committed by the proletariat are
crimes of accommodation or resistance to the bourgeoisie.
Questions
1. If capitalism is the cause of crime, how do you explain crime in a socialist society?
4. Should crimes of control be treated more harshly than regular crimes? Are they a
bigger threat to the system?
Notable Individuals
Bonger, Willem: (1876–1940) Dutch theorist, endorsed the Marxist view of class
conflict, wrote Criminality and Economic Conditions (1916).
Chambliss, William J.: Criminological theorist, wrote Law, Order, and Power (1982).
Marx, Karl: (1818–1883) European theorist, wrote The Communist Manifesto (1848).
Quinney, Richard: Sociologist, wrote The Social Reality of Crime (1970) and Class,
State, and Crime (1980).
37
Rusche, Georg: European theorist, coauthored Punishment and Social Structure (1968)
with Kirchheimer.
38
Chapter 12
Radical and Critical Theories
Terms
Cultural Criminology. Looks at all of the cultural forces in and around the crime, the
ffender, and the criminal justice system.
Left Idealism. Overlooking the pain caused to victims as the result of criminal
activities.
Left Realism. A variation of critical criminology. While this perspective examines the
role capitalism plays in society, it also recognizes the impact, damage, and fear caused
by traditional street crime. It proposes reforms to the system that would deal with these
crimes, assist the victims, reduce the use of prisons, and reduce crime as a whole. This
perspective rejects both the conservative and choice perspective of the right, and the
tendency of the left to overlook or disregard the true damage caused by crime.
Key Concepts
1. All of the theories presented in this chapter offer a critique of the normal way crime
and deviance is understood and studied.
2. These perspectives offer a break from traditional methods of scientific method, and in
its place propose a non-quantitative approach based on a variety of factors.
39
3. Constitutive criminology recommends that we abandon traditional searches for the
cause of criminal activity. It examines how all the actors in the system collectively
influence our understanding of crime.
4. Critical criminology is similar to Marxist theory in the belief that crime and
delinquency are defined by those who have the power in society. The law and
criminal justice system are then used to keep the powerless under control. After this
has been acknowledged, critical criminology works to find ways to empower the
powerless.
Questions
1. Is American society too diverse to ever agree on a peacemaking perspective?
2. The scientific method has been applied to the study of crime since Lombroso. What
would it mean to the study of crime if we adopted the approach recommended by
constitutive criminology and abandoned traditional empirical methods?
4. Many varieties of critical criminology have failed to offer a testable theory of crime.
Given this shortcoming, can they be of any benefit in understanding or solving the
crime problem?
40
Chapter 13
Feminist Theories
Terms
Bootstrapping. Refers to the practice of charging girls with criminal offenses once
status offenses have been eliminated. This allows the system to maintain control over
young girls.
Chivalry Hypothesis. The view that male police officers, prosecutors, and judges tend to
have traditional views of women and girls. As a result, the officials are more lenient on
the females for committing criminal acts than on their male counterparts.
Feminist Theory. This theory attempts to define criminology and criminal justice based
upon the experiences, understanding, and view of the world as perceived by women. It
tries to counter most theories of criminology that have been developed, tested, and
applied by men to men, which have incorporated women only as an afterthought.
Liberation Hypothesis. This view states that as men and women become more equal
in society in terms of family, politics, and education, their crime rates will begin to
equalize as well.
Masculinities. A trait shared by all men, but one that changes and evolves depending
upon the race, economic status, and sexual orientation of any particular man. Crime
may be viewed as an attempt to claim, reclaim, or prove the very qualities that make
one a man.
Masculinity thesis. The view that as women become more equal in society with men,
their crime rates will increase.
Opportunity hypothesis. The view that as women increase their numbers in corporate
America, their rates of white-collar and corporate crime will increase along with this
increased opportunity.
Paternalism. This view claims that men act in a manner designed to keep women and
girls in a subservient position in society. While women and girls may be treated less
41
severely as indicated under the chivalry hypothesis, they may also be treated more
harshly in an attempt to keep them from achieving equality with men.
Patriarchy. A manner of societal organization where the rights and privileges of men
are more important and trump the rights and privileges of women.
Selectivity hypothesis. The belief that chivalry in the criminal justice, in other
words, lenient sentencing, is extended primarily to white, middle-class, privileged
women.
Typicality hypothesis. The belief that chivalry in the criminal justice, in other words,
lenient sentencing, is extended primarily to women who commit crimes consistent with
the stereotypical view of women, and to women who can still be viewed as “feminine.”
Key Concepts
1. While there is no one feminist theory, all variations focus on patriarchy and the role it
plays in society.
2. According to feminist theory, women can be treated less severely than men for
committing a crime, or more severely than men in an attempt to keep them
subservient to men. Feminist theory focuses on the patriarchal system as the root
division in society between the dominant and subordinate groups.
3. Feminist theory questions whether or not theories of crime developed by men and for
men adequately explain female crime. In addition, they seek to understand why men
traditionally commit so many more crimes than women.
5. In order to correct the inequities facing women, feminist theorists contend that major
societal changes must occur. In addition, many feminist theorists believe that when
dealing with female offenders, prevention and treatment are preferable to punishment.
42
6. Gendered pathways and gendered contexts have offered news ways to examine
feminist theories and beliefs, while at the same time remaining connected to broader
criminological concepts. Gendered pathways focuses on the courses women and girls
have taken which lead to criminal activity, while gendered contexts examines how the
opportunities, contexts, and meanings of criminal activity may vary among the
genders.
Feminist theory is still in development, and no one version has gained prominence
over the others. While there are different versions of feminist theory, similarities
remain. Feminist theory examines the role of patriarchy in society and the manner in
which women are put in a subservient position to men. Feminist theorists seek to
explain why men commit more crime than women, and they question whether
theories developed by men and for men adequately explain female crime and
deviance. In contrast to earlier theories examined in this book, feminist theorists
examine the role society puts women in, identifies their strengths and vulnerabilities,
and seeks to use that basis to understand female criminality. Feminist theorists then
predict future rates of female offending and propose system reactions to female
offending. It must be noted however, that not all feminists view these issues the same,
and feminist perspectives often change based upon the age, race, and status of the
both the feminist researcher, and the feminist as victim.
Questions
2. Are men naturally more violent and criminal than women, or does the system simply
treat men and women differently for committing the same crime?
3. Would criminology look different today if all the early theories had been designed by
women, to explain the behaviors of women?
4. What policy implications are implied by feminist theories, and what societal changes
would be necessary for them to occur?
5. What examples of changes in the criminal justice system can you think of that have
been made to address the needs and concerns of women?
6. What is the state of empirical research on gendered pathways and gendered contexts?
Notable Individuals
Adler, Freda: Wrote Sisters in Crime: The Rise of the New Female Criminal (1975).
Messerschmidt, James W.: Wrote Crime as Structured Action: Gender, Race, Class,
and Crime in the Making (1997).
43
Simon, Rita: Wrote Women and Crime (1975).
44
Chapter 14
Integrating Criminological Theories
Terms
Conceptual Absorption. Concepts from one theory are subsumed as special cases of the
phenomena defined by the concepts of another theory.
Control Balance Theory. The ratio of how much the individual is liable to control to
how much he or she is able to control. It operates in the context of four main variables:
predisposition, provocation, opportunity, and constraint.
Life-Course Theories. These theories attempt to explain better the stability and
changes in criminal and deviant behavior through time and at different life stages.
Propositional Integration. This explains how two or more theories make the same
predictions about crime or make propositions that can be put together, even though
each may begin with different concepts and assumptions.
Self-Derogation Theory. A theory in which delinquency and drug use are explained
through the use of social learning theory, control theory, strain theory, and labeling
theory. In this perspective, delinquency is viewed as the result of the weakening of one’s
self-esteem.
State Dependence. Changes in criminality over the course of one’s life are
dependent on the occurrence, or lack of occurrence, of a variety of other factors.
Theoretical Integration. This occurs when two or more theories are combined in such a
manner so as to make the new theory explain criminal activity in a more comprehensive
45
manner. It can also be used to combine two competing theories which, upon reflection,
were not as incompatible as once thought.
Key Concepts
2. Theoretical integration has had minimal success. While theories may be recognized
for a while as integrative, over time they tend to be cited and tested as separate
theories.
Should any one theory be used to explain crime or deviance, or would some
combination of theories present a more accurate picture? Those questions are difficult
to answer, and there is no consensus within the field of criminology. Criminological
Theories has presented a wide range of theoretical perspectives. While these
perspectives differ, they all seek to explain all or part of the crime phenomenon.
Perhaps it is best to let all these theories “fight it out” until only a single perspective
remains. There is, however, another approach. Theoretical integration is a process in
which two or more competing theories are combined to make a new theory which
provides a more comprehensive view of crime. This integration can be conceptual or
propositional. Conceptual absorption can also be used to combine elements from
different theories. The benefit of these techniques is that it allows for the combination
of the best elements of various theories. It demonstrates how theories once viewed as
competitive can benefit and become more inclusive than was once thought. The final
chapter has yet to be written, and the question of the benefits of theory competition
verses theoretical integration has yet to be answered.
46
Questions
1. What are three principal ways by which theories can be evaluated and developed?
2. What model did Elliott and his associates use to propose a theory of delinquent
behavior? What theories did they rely on in their model?
5. What are the similarities and differences between propositional and conceptual
integration? Provide examples with theories that have been discussed.
6. Should the work of Cullen and Wright along with the work of Colvin be better
described as conceptual integration, or propositional integration? Explain.
7. Describe the work of Sampson and Laub. What policy implications may stem from
this work?
Notable Individuals
Akers, Ronald L.: Proposed the absorption of concepts from other theories by social
learning concepts, wrote Criminological Theories: Introduction, Evaluation, and
Application (1994, 1997, 2000, and with Christine S. Sellers, 2004).
Cullen, Francis T.: Proposed that social support can be used as a central concept
around which all of criminology can be unified.
Elliott, Delbert S.: One of the first to integrate strain, control, and social learning
theories, wrote Explaining Delinquency and Drug Use (1985).
Laub, John H.: Collaborated with Robert Sampson to propose and test life-course
perspectives. Wrote Crime in the Making: Pathways and Turning Points Through Life
(1993).
Sampson, Robert. Collaborated with John Laub to propose and test life-course
perspectives, coauthored Crime in the Making: Pathways and Turning Points Through
Life (1993) with Sampson.
47
Tittle, Charles R.: Proposed the control balance theory, wrote Control Balance:
Toward a General Theory of Deviance (1995).
48