Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Individual/Group Individual
Submission Due by 11:55pm AEST Sunday end of Module 6.1 (Week 11)
Intensive class: Due by 11:55pm AEST Sunday end of Module 6.1
(Week 6)
Weighting 35%
Task Summary
You are required to research and write a report focused on the specific challenges and issues that
arise owing to the use of microservices architecture as a software development philosophy. The
report length is 1500 words (+/- 10%). You are also required to identify and include risk mitigation
strategies that can be applied to minimise privacy and security risk in microservices-architected
environments.
Context
Microservices architecture signals a shift from monolithic software applications architecture to
different microservices architected to address different functions. Not only is there a shift in how
distribution of services impacts on managing security but hosting of services on cloud platforms not
owned by the organisation, and the use of communication channels between services adds
complexity to managing security.
Equally, additional complexity is provided through the rapid and incremental software development
principles associated with Agile and DevOps methods. The organisation as an enterprise has several
moral, ethical, and legal obligations regarding privacy and the security of information.
The purpose of this report is to engage you in building knowledge about privacy and security issues
with a specific focus on how these manifest in a microservices-architected environment. You are also
required to identify and discuss mitigations available to better manage privacy and security risk for
Task Instructions
1. Write a 1500-word report focused on the specific challenges and issues that arise owing to
the use of microservices architecture as a software development philosophy. Identify and
include risk mitigation strategies that can be applied to minimise privacy and security risk in
microservices-architected environments.
2. Whilst this is not a continuation of the case covered in Assignment 1 Part B, you might have
developed insights when completing the Assessment 1 Part B Case Study that can enrich this
assessment. Please review your notes to ensure that you have identified any context-based
insights from Assessment 1 Part B Case Study that can inform this assessment. Re-read any
relevant readings and conduct additional research in the area of investigation and select five
additional sources that will add value to your report in the relevant area of investigation.
3. Plan how you will structure your ideas for your report and write a report plan before you
start writing.
A title page with the subject code and name, assignment title, student’s name, student
number, and lecturer’s name.
The introduction (200–250 words) that will also serve as your statement of purpose for the
report—this means that you will tell the reader what you are going to cover in your report.
You will need to inform the reader of:
a. Your area of research and its context
b. The key concepts you will be addressing
c. What the reader can expect to find in the body of the report
The body of the report (1000–1100 words) will need to respond to the following:
a. The specific issues and challenges that arise owing to the use of microservices
architecture for software development as opposed to those that arise in service-
oriented architecture or monolithic application architecture
b. Potential privacy issues that may arise owing to these security issues/challenges
c. The reason for these issues/challenges and potential mitigations to manage the risk
for both privacy and security
The conclusion (200–250 words) will summarise any findings or recommendations that the
report puts forward regarding the concepts covered in the report.
6. Referencing
There are requirements for referencing this report using APA referencing style and it is
expected that you reference any lecture notes used and five additional sources in the
relevant subject area based on readings and further research.
It is essential that you use the appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research.
Please see more information on referencing here:
http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing
7. You are strongly advised to read the rubric, which is an evaluation guide with criteria for
grading your assignment—this will give you a clear picture of what a successful report looks
like.
Submission Instructions
Submit Assessment 2 via the Assessment link in the main navigation menu in MIS603 Microservices
Architecture. The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal.
Feedback can be viewed in My Grades.
I am aware that I need to keep a copy of all submitted material and their drafts, and I will do so
accordingly.
Knowledge and Lack of understanding of Limited understanding of Adequate knowledge or Thorough understanding of Highly developed
understanding the required concepts and required concepts and understanding of the the key concepts. understanding of the field
knowledge. Key knowledge. Some of the key required concepts. A or discipline/s.
Understanding of the components of the components of the reasonable capacity to Discriminates between
key concepts of assignment are not assignment are not explain and apply relevant assertion of opinion and Systematically and critically
computer-based addressed. addressed. key concepts. information substantiated discriminates between
business information by robust evidence from assertion of opinion and
systems including Lack of application, and Limited application and Supports opinion and the research/course information substantiated
elements of systems analysis of information to analysis to provide clear information substantiated materials and extended by robust evidence from
and processes, and how provide clear recommendations. by evidence from research reading. the research/course
systems aid competitive recommendations. to provide
advantage. recommendations.
50%
Use of academic and Does not adhere to the Written according to Written according to Well-written and adheres to Expertly written and
discipline conventions assignment brief of the academic genre as per the academic genre as per the the academic genre as per adheres to the academic
requirements for a short assignment brief. Minor assignment brief. the assignment brief. genre as per the
Formal tone. No use of business report. Poorly errors in the use of first- assignment brief.
first party perspective. written with informal person pronouns (I, my, we, Sound use of the Good use of the
tone, using first person me, us). introduction but does not introduction, which clearly Excellent use of the
Meets the assignment pronouns (I, my, we, me, clearly state either the states the purpose of the introduction, which secures
brief regarding us). Introduction attempted but purpose of the report or report and what the reader the attention of the reader,
introduction, body, and very generic, and does not what the reader should should expect to find in the clearly states the purpose
conclusion. No introduction clearly state the purpose of expect to find in the body body of the report. of the report and what the
attempted. Conclusion the report and what the of the report. reader should expect to
Appropriate use of not attempted. reader should expect to find Good use of the conclusion find in the body of the
credible resources. in the body of the report. Sound use of the conclusion and succeeds in summation report.
Demonstrates and succeeds in either the of key concepts discussed
Correct citation of key inconsistent and Conclusion attempted but summation of key concepts and key conclusions or Excellent use of the
resources using APA inadequate use of good- does not include summation discussed, or key recommendations. conclusion, which succeeds
style of referencing. quality, credible, and of key concepts discussed in conclusions or in confident summation of
relevant resources to the report and/or key recommendations, but not Consistently demonstrates key concepts and
30% support and develop conclusions or both. expert use of good quality, conclusions and gives the
ideas. recommendations. credible and relevant reader a clear sense of next
Demonstrates consistent research sources to support steps required.
No use of in-text Demonstrates consistent use use of credible and relevant and develop appropriate
references, or no of credible and relevant research sources to support arguments and statements. Demonstrates expert use of
reference list at the close research sources to support and develop ideas. Shows evidence of reading high-quality credible and
of the report. There are and develop ideas, but these beyond the key reading. relevant research sources