Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Practical Research 1
Quarter 4 – Module 23.3
Republic Act 8293, section 176 states that: No copyright shall subsist in any work
of the Government of the Philippines. However, prior approval of the government agency or
office wherein the work is created shall be necessary for exploitation of such work for profit.
Such agency or office may, among other things, impose as a condition the payment of
royalties.
Borrowed materials (i.e., songs, stories, poems, pictures, photos, brand names,
trademarks, etc.) included in this module are owned by their respective copyright holders.
Every effort has been exerted to locate and seek permission to use these materials from
their respective copyright owners. The publisher and authors do not represent nor claim
ownership over them.
1
Panning of Qualitative Data Collection
Information about this ADM learner’s material
2
Our lesson for today aims to deliver the
following objective:
a. draft a plan for a qualitative data
analysis.
Introduction
Planning of Qualitative Data Analysis
Everyday we make decisions. These may be small or big.
Regardless of its size, our decision affects us in one way or the other.
What should we do to come up with a wise and sound decision? The
answer is simple. We need to decide based on facts, not on emotions.
Why? Emotions are temporary but the effects of our decisions may be
long term. Thus, we should anchor our decisions to things and
situations we touch and see; not on things we just feel at the moment.
How will we make decisions based on facts? Let us consider the
pieces of evidence. An evidence may come in a form of documents or
common comments and suggestions from people whom we consider
knowledgeable in the problem or situation.
What if you will not consider pieces of evidence in making your
decisions? Your decisions might be faulty and sorry may not be
enough. Better consider facts than sorry. This sounds a routine activity
in our daily lives, but this is already a scientific process before jumping
into a conclusion. This goes similar in scientific research where all
conclusions are based on the analysis of facts and pieces of evidence
presented.
3
Got it? Let us continue and start the first
activity.
Activity 1
Recall an experience where somebody told you something you
never imagine could happen, like a betrayal from people so dear to you.
Narrate it here below.
_____________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
__________________________________________.
Activity 2
Guide Questions
1. What would be your reaction given your situation?
_____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
2. How will you make sure that the information that somebody told
you about someone is legitimate?
_____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
4
3. Is it appropriate to make a conclusion out of emotions or baseless
opinions? Why did you say so?
_____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
5
first method. For example, when you initially use in-depth interview, the
focus group as your secondary method can be used to fill missing points
of the first method or reinforce the established information. This is the
challenge of qualitative researcher to make sense of the collected data
immediately.
There are many techniques to analyze a qualitative data;
however, Colaizzi’s (1978) data reduction technique in Shosha (2012)
and Morrow, Rodriguez, and King (2015) is adapted in this presentation.
In a nutshell, Colaizzi’s data reduction technique involves a closer
examination of the raw data—the transcript, and a description of
common ideas across participants. The final output is a rich analysis and
description of the problem under investigation validated by the
participants of the study. Below is the illustration of the stages of
Colaizzi’s (1978) data reduction technique from Shosha (2012) and
Morrow, Rodriguez, and King (2015).
Step Description
1. Familiarization of The researcher immerses him/herself to the
Raw Data
data by reading and re-reading the transcripts to
familiarize and understand the phenomenon as
experienced by the participants of the study.
2. Identification of After or while reading and re-reading the data
Significant
transcription, the researcher must look for
Statement
statements that directly relate to the research
questions of the study. These statements can be
highlighted using a paper highlighter or
transferred to another sheet of paper. If
transferred to another sheet of paper, the
transcript label, page and line numbers must be
6
included to allow easy access on the original
transcript.
3. Formulation of Given the significant statements identified from
Meaning of the
the transcripts, a code or a meaning will be
Significant
Statements assigned to them individually considering the
context of which the study is conducted. In this
process, the researcher must suspend his/her
own judgement and biases and only formulate
meaning of the significant statements based on
the data.
4. Formulation of Theme refers to the big idea common across the
Themes
formulated significant statements. To identify the
theme, the researcher must group together
common or similar formulated meaning. An idea
will be assigned to a group of common or similar
formulated meaning constituting a theme.
Further analysis can be made, and basic
themes can be grouped together for another
level of organizing themes. Like formulation of
meaning of significant statements, personal
biases of the researcher must be withheld in this
phase of analysis.
5. Formulation of This phase of analysis concerns on writing a
Complete
comprehensive description of the phenomenon
Description of
the Phenomenon under study by incorporating all the themes and
ideas formulated from Step 4. This section must
be written as clear as possible so the reader can
achieve understanding of the problem and of the
7
results of the study. This section may be
submitted to your teacher to check whether or
not it captures the details of the phenomenon of
your study.
6. Development of This step simply clarifies and cleans your
Most Essential
descriptions of the phenomenon from the
Descriptions of
the Phenomenon corrections or evaluations made by your
teacher. Possible comments from your teacher
that need to be applied in your study is the
elimination of repeated, wrongly used, or
exaggerated descriptions which can strongly
confuse or weaken the overall descriptions of
the phenomenon. As a result, you will have a
shortened narrative showing only the
fundamental and meaningful descriptions of the
phenomenon.
7. Verification of the The final step seeks verification from the
Most Essential
participants of the study about the developed
Descriptions of
the Phenomenon most essential structure of the phenomenon.
by Research
This can be done by returning the narrative to
Participants
the participants of the study and let them check
whether the formulated most essential
descriptions capture their experiences. Given
the feedback from the participants, the
researcher may go back to prior analysis of the
study and check on possible inconsistencies as
may be pointed out by the participants.
9
Activity 3
The following are ideas from the techniques to analyze a qualitative
data. Arrange them in sequence by putting a number on the space
before the items.
Order Steps of Qualitative Data Analysis
The researcher completely and meaningfully describes the
phenomenon using the all the formulated themes.
The researcher reads and re-reads the data to familiarize the
phenomenon under study.
The researcher looks for statements from the interview
transcripts that directly relate to the research questions of the
study by highlighting them using a paper highlighter.
The researcher goes back to the participants and asks for
verification and confirmation of qualitative findings.
The researcher formulates an overarching idea across all the
formulated codes of significant statements.
The researcher labels or codes the highlighted significant
statements by considering the context of where and when the
study is conducted.
The researcher finalizes his/her output by editing the results on
obvious over description and under description of phenomenon
under study.
The researcher transcribes the audio or video tape recordings.
10
1. Qualitative data collection is way different from quantitative data
collection. While proxy may be allowed in quantitative data
collection, the presence of the researcher is a requirement in
qualitative data collection.
ACTIVITY 4
Go back to the problem you identified for your qualitative study. Recall
your research purpose and data collection strategy. Imagine you are
done collecting your data then map out below the steps you need in the
analysis of your data. Then, explain each step in detail.
STEP 1:
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
STEP 2:
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
11
STEP 3:
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
STEP 4:
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
STEP 5:
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
STEP 6:
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
STEP 7:
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
12
Answer Key:
Answers of Activity 1 and Activity 2 may vary. However, the answers
must be pointed towards appreciation of an appropriate data analytic
procedures before making any decision or conclusion.
Activity 3
Order Steps of Qualitative Data Analysis
6 The researcher completely and meaningfully describes the
phenomenon using the all the formulated themes.
Activity 4
Answers may vary.
13
References
14