Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ARCHITECTURE
. يشتمل كل اسلوب معماري على لغة معمارية تحتوي على مفردات ونحو ودالالت.ملخص
يمكن اصالح هذه.يمكن تعريف المبادئ التركيبية السلوب معين بانها مجموعة من القواعد
القواعد وتحويلها باستخدام تقنيات حسابية رياضية باستخدام قواعد الشكل(طريقة منهجية
استخدم الباحثون في جميع أنحاء العالم قواعد.)تستخدم لتفسير التصميم و االنشطة المكانية
االشكال لتحليل انماط تصميم االساليب المعمارية التقليدية واعمال المهندسين المعماريين
يمكن إعتماد هذه االساليب القائمة على القواعد في لغات الكمبيوتر.الرئيسيين وما إلى ذلك
تصور العمارة التقليدية الي منطقة ثقافتها المناسبة بجميع جوانب.إلنتاج تصميمات جديدة
تهدف الورقة المقترحة إلى دراسة إمكانات قواعد الشكل الستخدامها كاداة في.الحياة البشرية
يستعرض منهج البحث.البحث عن االساليب المعمارية التقليدية من خالل دراسات الحاالت
دراسات قواعد الشكل السابقة التي اجريت في مختلف االساليب التقليدية والتحليل المقارن
يعد البحث الذي اجراه المبي ودونغري حول.بنظرات المؤلفين في تكوين قواعد الشكل
صياغة القواعد الشكلية لمنازل بول في احمد آباد وعمل كاجداس على المنازل التركية
قام تي نيت بصياغة قواعد نحوية لبيوت الشاي اليابانية وطور.التقليدية مثاال على ذلك
يوسف نيا باشا و تيلنغ قواعد نحوية المنازل المحلية المواجهة لحقول االرز في مازندران
وكذلك استخدم العديد من الباحثين القواعد النحوية الشكلية كاداة لتحليل العمارة.بإيران
ومن اجل ذلك ستقارن الدراسة بين االجيال النحوية لالشكال التقليدية المختلفة.التقليدية
وتصوغ نموذج قاعدة نحوية تقليدية الستكمال نطاق البحث االضافي في المجال
1. Introduction
Fashi's architectural style (Li, 2001). Maria Angela Dias had generated shape
grammar of an informal city, Rocinha Favela in Brazil (Dias, 2014). The
authors' expectation was that study would help improve housing and public
space in the favela. Eloy and Duarte had used shape grammar to analyse the
quality of designs with a comparative test on Lisbon apartments(Eloy and
Duarte, 2014). Yue and Krishnamurti had estimated Queen Anne houses'
interior layout using shape grammar to capture the building style(Yue,
Krishnamurti and Grobler, 2012). Various researchers had used shape
grammar to analyse the different traditional architecture
The traditional Turkish houses are single-storied houses built between the
15th and 16th centuries in the Ottoman Empire. The ground floor is used for
ancillary purposes when the house has more than one floor. The house
contains spaces such as bedrooms, stairs, laundry, pantry, kitchen, hall etc.
Cagdas had formulated the parametric shape grammar of these houses as
they were getting demolished widely (Çaǧdaş, 1996). Turkish houses'
peculiarity is that they have several plan types based on plan shape, location
of central hall etc. Cagdas had identified plan elements and types of plan in
the first stage. The method Cagdas used in generating grammar of Turkish
houses is similar to the method used by Flemming for Queen Anne houses
(Flemming, 1987). The generation process employed by Cagdan starts by
locating a particular space and proceeds by adding the adjacent areas to the
Cagdas represented shapes with integer numbers' 1' and '0" for empty cells in
the matrix. The same integer numbers represent the sub shape in a block as
in a matrix. The usage of a matrix to represent polygon is necessary to
convert the symbolic representations into graphical outputs for the algorithm
generation. Even spatial relations illustrated using integers in the matrix.
These spatial relations are necessary for grammar generation.
Figure 3. Part of a tree diagram of plan layout generated for houses with a central
hall.(Çaǧdaş, 1996)
The authors generated the central room of the principal building d in stage 2.
The central hall is situated on the central axis with key brick as its centre.
The central room is generated using four rules. Stage three adds openings to
the central room. Taiwanese houses consist of two types of doors, main
doors and regular doors. There are ten rules in this stage which can be
classified into three. Rules 7 to 9 creates openings in the front wall of the
central hall. The second group creates openings on the rear wall, and the last
rule creates openings in both walls. There are four rules at this stage. Stage
four generates the plan of the main building using seven sets of rules. First,
two rules create the plan of the main building. The next rule adds two rooms
to the main building. Rule 18 terminates the generation of the principal
building. Rule 19 adds an additional space within the room by adding a wall.
Rule 20 and 21 extend porch across the already added rooms. Stage 5 adds
openings to the rooms in the main building. All the rooms in the main
building are directly or indirectly connected to the central room. Rooms
were with a minimum number of openings. The fifth stage consists of two
sets of shape rules. The first group consists of rules for adding placeholders
for doors and other groups for windows. And stage 6 replaces doors and
windows by their two-dimensional icons. The seventh stage generates a
courtyard at the front of the main building. Courtyards in the Taiwanese
houses are open space between the main building and two secondary
buildings. The plan of the secondary building is generated in stage 8. The
secondary building connects the main buildings parallel to the line of
symmetry. 9th stage computes the fortunate dimensions of the main building,
which is in front of a courtyard. The procedure here is similar to stage 1, but
building height also is considered here. Height of the building should be less
than the main building. Stage 10 generates the main building plan, which is
in front of a courtyard. The next stage generates a secondary building which
surrounds the front main building. The secondary building's extent is given
by the sum of depths of front buildings and the courtyards. 12th stage
generates another kind of secondary building connected by a passing room
to the end room of the main building (Chiou and Krishnamurti, 1995).
These secondary buildings are perpendicular to the line of symmetry. In
stage 13, openings are added to secondary structures. Stage 14 describes the
rules for making platforms, an essential component of Chinese architecture.
Roofs represent a person's social position in Chinese architecture—stage 15
represents the rule schema for creating roofs. 16th stage modifies the lines in
the plan to three-dimensional walls. The height of the wall depends on the
roof. The last stage is termination, in which all the labels used in plan
generation are erased. The stage has four rules Chiou and Krishnamurti had
formulated the grammar of traditional Taiwanese houses with bilateral
symmetry as an essential feature (Chiou and Krishnamurti, 1995).
4. Discussion
The two case studies depict two different ways of grammar generation in
traditional architecture. In the case of shape grammar of Turkish houses, an
imaginary grid line guides the generation process, and several derivations
are possible in this. The parametric shape grammar has a generative
approach as substitution rule sets represent the spatial relations in the plan
layouts. The polygon representing the hall is considered the initial shape of
the grammar as the hall type determines the plan type of Turkish house.
Shapes are mathematically represented using integer matrices in this
approach. Here, shape grammar is generated in two-dimensional layouts
only. The usage of grid prevents spatial uncertainty and control
interpenetration of blocks and spaces. Cultural and climatological factors
regarding the traditional style are not studied in this approach. In the second
case study of Taiwanese houses, the derivation starts by locating the central
axis, and the bilateral symmetry of the plan has great importance in the
derivation. Another difference, in this case, is that the house is not a single
building. Chiou and Krishnamurti defined the generation of primary and
secondary buildings based on the relation to the main building and symmetry.
The generation process is about the hierarchy of buildings. The method is
suitable for styles in which building complex consists of several buildings
and follows symmetry.
The sample grammar generation is conducted in a third method similar to
Lambe and Dongre's Pol house grammar(Lambe and Dongre, 2019) and
Yousefenipasha's Mazandaran vernacular house grammar(Yousefniapasha et
al., 2019). In which, A base point is located based on the climatological and
cultural factors. And generation begins with locating axis on the basepoint. A
datum space is located on the axis, and other spaces are generated based on
the hierarchy and proximity of spaces with respect to that. The generated
grammar is non-deterministic grammar with multiple derivations. The
grammar generation consists of 12 stages and 57 rules. Figure 8 shows the
possible shape computations. In the designs that have informal development
of spaces and have a hierarchy in their importance, the method used in
Kuttichira houses can be applied. The three cases depict three different
approaches to shape grammar generation of traditional prototypes. Even
from a primary observation, we can analyse that the plan character has an
important role in determining the derivation methodology.
4. Conclusion
References