Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Shen Weizhen
1010153Digital Design Frontiers
There are already scholars who focus on the unique formal language of China's
architectural space, and interpret information such as spatial combination and
architectural design specifications into mathematical language for computer
storage and processing. My research area is traditional Chinese architecture, and
I notice that the norms and specifications are also adopted in traditional
2
The Yingzao fashi and the Qing Gongbu gongcheng zuofa zeli were the general
building codes of the Song and Qing dynasties respectively. Although there is
still no accurate conclusion on the scope of their dissemination and
implementation, they were no doubt the summary of official and regional
practices at that time, and their regulation on structural design, dimensions, and
materials can be proved by the extant buildings to some extent. Therefore,
studying the grammar of Yingzao Fashi has universal value for our present-day
understanding of traditional construction ideas.
In the case of the Yingzao fashi, that tradition was rule-based and parametric.
The rules for structural carpentry (大木作制度) set up 8 classes for the scale of
constructive elements, with the modular unit of ts’ai (材) and fen (分,即份), and
1 ts’ai=15 fen(Fig.1). The choice of grade was closely related to the scale, function,
and structural form of the building, and so the module system is considered one
of the main features of traditional Chinese high-style architecture. One problem
is that the text of Yingzao fashi sometimes uses ts’ai and fen as units and
sometimes use foot and inches(尺与寸). Chen Mingda restated the Yingzao fashi
in a consistently parametric way by studying extant buildings, and concluding
that the sixth class was where the equivalence meets, at which 60 inches = 150
3
fen. According to his method, all structural timber elements can be measured
and processed in units of ts’ai and fen, providing us with a possibility to
understand the overall design approach of the historical buildings (Fig.2).
3
Secondly, Li considered explicitly what the user decided and when he decided it,
and organized the grammar accordingly. It was the student who evaluated the
designs – did this design belong to the language? – and adjusted the grammar
accordingly. Thus the student participated actively in defining the language of
designs, and learned that style was eventually determined by human rather than
by parameterization.
Li took the generation of the Ting Hall’s section as an example for his grammar
design. His shape grammar consisted of four initial shape, which were sections
of 4,6,8, and 10 rafters, each consisting of a ground line, two columns, and purlins.
Rule A adds no columns to the section. Rule B adds a central column below the
ridge purlin. Rule C contains two subrules, C1 and C2. C1 adds one column and
one beam spanning between that column and the front column, and the length
of beam varies from one-rafter long to six-rafter long. Subrule C2 is like C1 but
acts from the back of the ting hall. Displayed as character strings the following
5
sequences are possible: A, B, BC, BCC, C, CC (Fig.5.). The algorithm is able to
numerate all results, and the user then removes incorrect results according to
other rules, such as the ratio of plan width to length.
References:
1. 魏力恺,张颀,张昕楠,张备.计算机辅助建筑设计的过去、现在与未来[J].工业
建筑,2012,42(11):158-162+157.DOI:10.13204/j.gyjz2012.11.014.
2. 拉普卜特, 常青, 徐菁,等. 宅形与文化[M]. 中国建筑工业出版社, 2007.
3. 陈明达. 营造法式大木作制度研究[M]. 文物出版社, 1993.
4. LI, ANDREW I-KANG. 2001. A shape grammar for teaching the architectural
style of the Yingzao fashi. PhD dissertation, Department of Architecture,
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass.
5. LI, ANDREW I-KANG. 2009. Computing the Yingzao fashi. In Computational
constructs: architectural design, logic and theory, eds. Chen Shouheng, Li Shuyi,
and Josh Lobel, 113–125. Beijing: Zhongguo jianzhu gongye chubanshe.
6. 魏力恺.建筑降维:建筑生成的基础性问题和建筑 降维概念[J].建筑学
报,2021(06):48-55.DOI:10.19819/j.cnki.ISSN0529-1399.202106011.