REPORT ON EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE DESIGN OF BUILDING STRUCTURE

RESIDENTIAL BUILDING

Client:

Designed By:
Er. Rajib Maharjan
Table of Contents

1. BACKGROUND

2. INTRODUCTION

2.1 PROJECT INFORMATION

3. ASSUMPTION OF DATA

3.1 UNIT WEIGHT OF MATERIAL

3.2 LOADS

 LIVE LOAD
 DEAD LOAD
 SESMIC LOAD

3.3 LOAD COMBINATION

 DESIGN LOAD COMBINATION

4. DESIGN

4.1 FOUNDATION DESIGN

4.2 SLAB DESIGN

4.3 COLUMN DESIGN

4.4 BEAM DESIGN

4.5 STAIRCASE DESIGN

5. CONCLUSION

6. BIBLIOGRAPHY

1. BACKGROUND

Structural Analysis Report

Page 1
 Kathmandu valley is seismic prone city and the risk it faces from earthquake is very high. So,
the design of earthquake resistant structures is important. Nepal lies in the V th zone which is at
high risk of vulnerability. So, there is high demand for the earthquake resistant design of the
building for saving from these devastating disasters.

Earthquake is a shaking of the earth surface caused by the waves originated underneath and on
the surface of earth. Earthquake causes are volcanic eruption, slipping of faults, tectonic
activities, explosion etc…..

Structural design with the sound knowledge of structural engineering determines the sizes of
members like beam, column, rebar arrangements and others. These structures are subjected to
various loads like concentrated loads, uniformly distributed loads, uniformly varying loads,
random loads, internal or earthquake load and dynamic forces. The structure transfers its load to
the support and ultimately to the ground. While transferring the loads acting on the structures,
the members of the structures are subjected to internal forces like axial force, shear force,
bending and torsion moments. Structural analysis deals with analyzing these internal forces in
the members of the structures.

Since the site is located at Kathmandu, According to IS893-2002, Kathmandu lies in V th zone,
the severest one. Hence, the effects of earthquake is pre-dominant than the wind load. So, the
building is analyzed for earthquake as lateral load.

2. INTRODUCTION

The structure design of commercial building has been carried out using ETABS (Structure
Analysis and Design Software) by Limit State Method of Design.

The report has been prepared in complete conformity with various stipulations in Indian
Standards, codes of practice concrete to IS SP 16, criteria earthquake resistant design structure
IS 1893:2002 ductile detailing of reinforced concrete structures subjected to seismic forces-
codes of practice IS 13920-1993, handbook or concrete reinforced and detailing IS: SP 34. Use
of these codes have emphasized on providing sufficient safety, economy, strength and ductility
besides satisfactory serviceability requirements of cracking deflection in concrete structures.
These codes are based on principles of Limit State of design.

3. ASSUMPTION OF DATA
3.1. UNIT WEIGHT OF MATERIAL

Structural Analysis Report

Page 2
 As per IS 875:

Reinforced Cement Concrete = 25 KN/m3

Cement Plaster/Screeding = 20.40 KN/m3

Marble Finishing = 26.70 KN/m3

3.2. Loads

 DEAD LOAD
Dead Load on the structure comprise the self weight of the member; weight of the
finishes and partition walls. These are usually dependent upon the constructional
features and have to be assumed in order to design various structural concrete
members. The loads on the beams due to the slabs were calculated according to
clause 23.5 of IS 456-2000. The wall is taken for thickness of either 230mm or
110mm as per architectural drawing and suitable reduction is made for window and
door opening. As the software, we have used, generates the self weight of the
structural member by itself, we have not calculated the self weight.
 LIVE LOAD
The Live Load for the building is extracted from IS code 875 part II-1987 for
different occupancies.
I. 1.5 KN/m2 for accessed terrace and 0.75 KN/m2 for non accessed terrace.
II. 2.0 KNm2 for rooms
III. 2.0 KN/m2 for stairs, passage, lobby, etc
 SESMIC LOAD
Assessment of Lateral Loads
It is the load acting horizontally in accordance with storey masses of building.
Seismic weight is the total dead load plus appropriate amount of specified imposed
load. While computing the seismic load weight of each floor, the weight of columns
and walls in any storey shall be equally distributed to the floors above and below
the storey. The seismic weight of the whole building is the sum of the seismic
weights of all floors. It has been calculated according to IS: 1893-(Part I)-2002.
IS: 1893 - (Part I) - 2002 states that for the calculation of the design seismic forces
of the structure the imposed load on roof need not be considered.

Structural Analysis Report

Page 3
 The wind load and earthquake loads are assumed not to act simultaneously. A
building is design for the worst condition of two loads. In our case, earthquake
forces govern Lateral load. Thus, assignment of lateral load is carried out according
to IS: 1893-(Part I)-2002. There are basically three methods to determine the
earthquake force in the building:
a. Seismic Coefficient Method or Static Method
b. Response Spectrum Method or Modal Analysis or Spectral Acceleration
Method or Dynamic Method
c. Time History Method

The Seismic Coefficient Method is generally applicable to building up to 40m height

and those are more or less symmetrical in plan and elevation. This method basically
consists of calculation of base shear V B. The base shear VB is given by the following
equation:

VB = Ah.W

Ah = Where,

Where,
Ah = Horizontal seismic coefficient value
Z = Zone factor for max considered earthquake condition given in IS 1893 (part I)
: 2002 clause 6.4.2, table 2
R = Response reduction factor given in IS1893 (part I):2002 clause 6.4.2, table 7

= Spectral acceleration depending upon the period of vibration and damping as

given in IS: 1893 (part I): 2002 clause 6.4.2, figure 2

I = Post-disaster importance factor depending on the life and function of structure,
historical value or economic importance as IS 1893 (part I):2002, table 6
W = Seismic weight which include
a. Floor wise dead load consisting of weight of floor, beams, parapet, fixed
permanent equipment and half the wall and columns etc. above and below.

Structural Analysis Report

Page 4
 b. Reduce live load on the building (25% of live load for LL≤ 3.0 KN/m 2 and
50% of LL for LL> 3.0 KN/m2)
T = Estimated natural or fundamental period of vibration building in second

= For moment resisting concrete building

= 0.09 for braced concrete building

H = Total height of building in m in a direction perpendicular to the earthquake

force
Ds = Dimension of building in m in a direction parallel to the applied earthquake
force
After calculating the base shear VB the distribution of earthquake force on different
floor is determined as follows;

Qi =

Qi = Horizontal force acting at any floor

Wi = Weight of ith storey assumed to be lumped at ith floor
hi = Height of ith floor above base of frame
Once the floor loads are obtained the frame can be analyzed by Portal or Cantilever
Method or Stiffness Matrix Method.
The designed storey shear in any storey is distributed to the various elements of the
vertical lateral force resisting system in proportion to their rigidity considering the
rigidity of diaphragm.

 LOAD COMBINATION
Different load cases and load combination cases as per IS 875 are considered to
obtain most critical element stresses in structure in the course of analysis. There are
altogether four load cases considered for the structural analysis are mentioned as
below:
a. Dead Load (DL)
b. Live Load (LL)

Structural Analysis Report

Page 5
 c. Earthquake load in x-direction (EQx)
d. Earthquake load in x-direction (EQx)

The following load combinations are adopted:

1. 1.5 (DL+ LL)

2. 1.2(DL+LL+EQx)
3. 1.2(DL+LL-EQx)
4. 1.2(DL+LL+EQy)
5. 1.2(DL+LL-EQy)
6. 1.5 (DL+ EQx)
7. 1.5 (DL- EQx)
8. 1.5 (DL+ EQy)
9. 1.5 (DL- EQy)
10. 0.9DL+1.5EQx
11. 0.9DL-1.5EQx
12. 0.9DL+1.5EQy
13. 0.9DL-1.5EQy

25% of LL as reduced live load RLL is to be considered when combined with EQ Load. Similarly,
earthquake load is to be considered in two horizontal directions X and Y and in each direction, the
load will be reversible, i.e. in +X and +Y directions.

4. DESIGN

4.1 FOUNDATION DESIGN

The isolated, combine, strap, raft footing is designed using limit state method and depth of
foundation is checked against moment due to soil pressure and checked in one way shear.
Grade of concrete and steel are M20 and Fe500 with clear cover 50mm.
4.2 SLAB DESIGN
The slabs are designed as two way slab by bending moment coefficient method for different
boundary condition which is as follows:
a. Interior panel
b. One short edge discontinuous
c. One long edge discontinuous

Structural Analysis Report

Page 6
 No bent up bars are used. Extra cut pieces are used for extra top bars. Grade
of concrete and steel are M20 and Fe500 with clear cover 15mm.

4.3 COLUMN DESIGN

Columns are designed with the help of ETABS. Sizes and reinforcement are provided as
instructed by ETABS checking it with the limit provided by IS 456:2000. Grade of concrete
and steel are M20 and Fe500 with clear cover 40mm.

4.4 BEAM DESIGN

Columns are designed with the help of ETABS. Sizes and reinforcement are provided as
instructed by ETABS checking it with the limit provided by IS 456:2000. Grade of concrete
and steel are M20 and Fe500 with clear cover 25mm.

4.5 STAIRCASE DESIGN

Either dog legged or open well staircase is designed for live load 2KN/m 2 as per code. Grade
of concrete and steel are M20 and Fe500 with clear cover 20mm.

5. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION

The project has mainly been directed towards the structural analysis and design part only.
Nevertheless the attempts had been made in architectural planning and for the presentation
of the analysis and design result in tabular form with necessary drawings and details. The
fundamental principle and methodology applied while applied while analyzing and
designing the structure in is universally valid for any type of the framed structural buildings.
Design of beam, column and foundation was done with the help of ETABS 2016 and IS
codes for ductile design. After design of all members structural drawing is drawn as per
design and other detailing rule. Hence safe, stable and economical seismic design of the
building is done.

6. BIBLIOGRAPHY

A.K Chopra Dynamics of Structure.

Jain, A.K Reinforced Concrete Design.
Pankaj Agrawal and Manish Shrikhande. Earthquake resistance Design of Structure.
S.N. Sinha. Reinforced Concrete Design.
S.U. Pillai and D. Menon. Reinforced Concrete Design.

Codes

Structural Analysis Report

Page 7
 1. Plain and Reinforced Concrete Code of Practice – IS 456:2000
2. Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structure – IS 1893 (Part I):2000
3. Design Aids for Reinforced Concrete – SP 16
4. Ductility Detailing Code – IS 13920:1993
5. Design and Construction of Raft Foundation – IS 2950(Part I) – 1981

EARTHQUAKE LOAD CALCULATION

Lateral load distribution

Structural Analysis Report

Page 8
Type of soil = medium
Height of building
(H) = 8.53 m
base dimenstion of building at the plinth level (d) in X-direction = 9.47 m
base dimenstion of building at the plinth level (d) in Y-direction = 8.8 m
clause IS
Time Period in X-direction = 0.075H 0.75 = 0.37 1893:2002; 7.6.1
clause IS
Time Period in Y-direction = 0.075H 0.75 = 0.37 1893:2002; 7.6.1
clause IS
Sa/g (X-dir) = 2.500 1893:2002; 6.4.5
clause IS
Sa/g (Y-dir) = 2.500 1893:2002; 6.4.5
clause IS
Zone factor (Z) = 0.360 for Zone V 1893:2002; Table 2
Importance factor
(I)= 1.000
for special RCC clause IS
Response reduction factor (R)= 5 building 1893:2002; Table 7

Seismic weight of the building (W)= 2318.151 KN

clause IS
Seismic coefficient (Ah) = (Z/2)*(I/R)*(Sa/g) = 0.09 1893:2002; 6.4.2

Base shear Vb = Ah X W = 208.6336 KN

Load case Definition

Name Type Self Weight Multiplier Auto Load
Dead Dead 1
Live Live 0
wall Dead 0
EQx Seismic 0 IS1893 2002
EQy Seismic 0 IS1893 2002

Load Calculations
A DEAD LOAD
. CALCULATION                

Structural Analysis Report

Page 9
                    
1 Unit Weights of materials                
kN/m
3
  Brick masonry 19.2            
kN/m
3
  Screed 22            
kN/m
3
  Mosaic 22            
kN/m
3
  Marble 26.7            
kN/m
3
  Reinforced Concrete 24.5            
kN/m
3
  Cement plaster 20.4            
                   
Heights of Beams, Walls &
2 Parapet Walls                

Depth of Beam in
  Longitudinal Direction 0.23 m            

Depth of Beam in Transverse

  Direction 0.3 m            
  Height of Building 2.74 m            

  Height of Parapet Wall 0.3 m            

                   
3 Dead Loads of Walls                
with
inside and
Dead load of 230 mm thick
outside
wall
11.08 plaster 25 1.28 KN/ Tot 12.3 KN/
a) 4 kN/m mm 0 m al 6 m
with
inside and
Dead load of 230 mm thick
outside
wall with 40 % opening
plaster 25 0.89 KN/ Tot KN/
c) 6.650 kN/m mm 6 m al 7.55 m
with
inside and
Dead load of 115 mm thick
outside
wall
d plaster 12 1.28 KN/ Tot KN/
) 5.542 kN/m mm 0 m al 6.82 m

Dead Load of 115 mm wall with

(4") with 40% opening inside and 1.28 KN/ Tot KN/
e) 3.325 kN/m outside 0 m al 4.61 m

Structural Analysis Report

Page 10
 plaster 25
mm
with
inside and
Dead load of parapet wall of
outside
0.25m height
g plaster 25 KN/ Tot KN/
) 0.662 kN/m mm 0.15 m al 0.82 m
                   
4 Floor Loads                
  Thickness of slab 0.100 m            
  Thickness of tile with plaster 0.020 m            
  Thickness of Marble 0.020 m            
Thickness of Screed for
  Marble 0.025 m            
Thickness of Screed without
  marble/tile 0.050 m            
                   
kN/m
  Dead load of structural slab 2.450 2            
                   
kN/m
  Dead load of Tile 0.440 2            
kN/m
  Dead load of Marble 0.534 2            
Dead load of screed for kN/m
  marble/tile 0.550 2            
Dead load of screed without kN/m
  marble 1.100 2            
Dead load of light partition kN/m
  walls 1.000 2            
      Take            
for other than light partition
  need to be calculated                
Total dead load with
  marble 4.534 5.200 kN/m2          
2
  Total dead load with tile 4.440 5.100 kN/m          
Total Dead load with only
  Screed 3.55 3.600 kN/m2          
                   
B
. Live Load Calculation                
  For Institutional Building                
  Floors                
kN/m
2
                 
  Live load for Bed, living 2 kN/m            

Structural Analysis Report

Page 11
 2
Rooms etc.
Live load for Kitchen & kN/m
2
  Dining Room 2            
kN/m
2
  Live load for Toilet Floors 2            
Live load for corridor,
passage, staircase, balconies
  floor 3              
                   
kN/m
2
  Roof              
KN/m access
  Live Load for Roof 1.5 2 provided          
access not
    0.75   provided          
                   
                   

3 Structural Analysis

The analysis and design have been carried out using software called Etabs 2016. It provides

the Structural Engineer with all the tools necessary to create, modify, analyze, design, and

optimize the structural elements in a building model.

Structural Analysis Report

Page 12
 The building geometry based on architectural drawings been generated using above named

software. The dead load, live load and lateral loads were supplied to the digital models as

per standard code of practices. Several analysis run were performed to achieve the best

result to meet the design and service requirements.

For the analysis, following loading parameters were considered:

i. Self weight of the frames and slabs

ii. Floor finishing dead loads

iii. Fixed wall loads as per architectural drawings

iv. Staircase load

v. Partition wall loads as per architectural drawings only

vi. Live loads

3.1 Modeling of the building:

i. 3D view with beams and column Assignment

ii. Wall load assignment
iii. Dead load assignment
iv. Live load assignment

3D view with beams and column Assignment

Structural Analysis Report

Page 13
 Wall Load Assignment

Structural Analysis Report

Page 14
 Dead Load Assignment

Structural Analysis Report

Page 15
 Live Load Assignment

Structural Analysis Report

Page 16
Analysis Results

Structural Analysis Report

Page 17
 1) Maximum Storey Drift: within the limit of 0.004

Load
X Y Z
Story Case/Com Direction Drift Label
m m m
bo
Story3 EQx X 0.001466 3 9.4742 8.8138 8.5344
Story3 EQy Y 0.001123 6 9.4742 0 8.5344
Story2 EQx X 0.00192 16 0 -1.1 5.6896
Story2 EQy Y 0.00179 6 9.4742 0 5.6896
Story1 EQx X 0.001512 8 0 0 2.8448
Story1 EQy Y 0.001484 6 9.4742 0 2.8448

2) Base Reactions

Load FX FY FZ MX MY MZ
Case/Combo kN kN kN kN-m kN-m kN-m
Dead 8.6154 -4.8769 1849.5267 7810.0987 -9782.0079 -90.4333
Live -1.455E-05 0.0182 385.3629 1390.3906 -1978.7149 0.1113
Wall 5.982E-06 0.0067 1007.365 4607.3724 -4706.7334 0.0412
EQx -208.6338 0.0811 0 0 -1331.3801 905.8886
EQy -0.0044 -204.188 0 1331.3801 0 -1204.6015
Comb1 12.9231 -7.278 4863.382 20711.7927 -24701.1843 -135.4212
Comb2 -240.022 -5.7251 3890.7056 16569.4341 -21358.6036 978.7294
Comb3 260.699 -5.9198 3890.7056 16569.4341 -18163.2913 -1195.4032
Comb4 10.3332 -250.848 3890.7056 18167.0903 -19760.9475 -1553.8588
Comb5 10.3438 239.2032 3890.7056 14971.778 -19760.9475 1337.1849
Comb6 -300.0275 -7.1836 4285.3376 18626.2068 -23730.1822 1223.2447
Comb7 325.8738 -7.427 4285.3376 18626.2068 -19736.0418 -1494.4211
Comb8 12.9165 -313.5873 4285.3376 20623.277 -21733.112 -1942.4905
Comb9 12.9298 298.9767 4285.3376 16629.1366 -21733.112 1671.3141
Comb10 -305.1968 -4.2615 2571.2026 11175.7241 -15036.9374 1277.48
Comb11 320.7045 -4.5049 2571.2026 11175.7241 -11042.797 -1440.1858
Comb12 7.7473 -310.6652 2571.2026 13172.7943 -13039.8672 -1888.2552
Comb13 7.7605 301.8989 2571.2026 9178.6539 -13039.8672 1725.5494

3) Modal Mass Participation Ratios

Modal Participating Mass Ratios (Part 1 of 2)
Period
Case Mode UX UY UZ Sum UX Sum UY Sum UZ
sec
Modal 1 0.549 0.8402 0.0037 0 0.8402 0.0037 0
Modal 2 0.511 0.0074 0.6817 0 0.8476 0.6854 0

Structural Analysis Report

Page 18
 Period
Case Mode UX UY UZ Sum UX Sum UY Sum UZ
sec
Modal 3 0.412 0.0009 0.1896 0 0.8485 0.875 0
Modal 4 0.203 0.1183 0.0008 0 0.9668 0.8758 0
Modal 5 0.186 0.0007 0.0964 0 0.9674 0.9722 0
Modal 6 0.167 1.765E-06 0.0022 0 0.9674 0.9744 0
Modal 7 0.131 0.0213 0.0047 0 0.9887 0.9791 0
Modal 8 0.126 0.0085 0.0162 0 0.9972 0.9953 0
Modal 9 0.11 0.0012 0.0031 0 0.9984 0.9984 0
Modal 10 0.026 3.17E-06 0.0005 0 0.9984 0.9989 0
Modal 11 0.022 0.0005 0 0 0.9989 0.9989 0
Modal 12 0.022 0 0.0008 0 0.9989 0.9997 0

Modal Participating Mass Ratios (Part 2 of 2)

Case Mode RX RY RZ Sum RX Sum RY Sum RZ
Modal 1 0.0039 0.5545 0.0093 0.0039 0.5545 0.0093
Modal 2 0.5189 0.0071 0.1989 0.5228 0.5615 0.2082
Modal 3 0.0282 0.0041 0.6671 0.551 0.5656 0.8753
Modal 4 0.0026 0.3971 0.0002 0.5536 0.9627 0.8755
Modal 5 0.3994 0.0022 0.0001 0.953 0.9649 0.8756
Modal 6 0.0101 4.996E-05 0.0945 0.9631 0.965 0.9701
Modal 7 0.01 0.0208 0.0041 0.9731 0.9858 0.9742
Modal 8 0.0235 0.0094 0.0067 0.9966 0.9952 0.9809
Modal 9 0.0001 0.0016 0.018 0.9967 0.9968 0.999
Modal 10 0.0011 4.637E-06 0.0001 0.9979 0.9968 0.9991
Modal 11 0 0.001 0.0003 0.9979 0.9978 0.9993
Modal 12 0.0015 9.359E-07 0.0001 0.9994 0.9978 0.9994

Elevation view 1-1 Mode Shape (Modal)- Mode 1-Period 0.549

Structural Analysis Report

Page 19
 Base View Restraint Reaction [Comb1](KN,KN-m)

Structural Analysis Report

Page 20
FORCE MOMENT DIAGRAMS

Structural Analysis Report

Page 21
 Axial Force

Shear Diagram 2-2

Structural Analysis Report

Page 22
 Moment Diagram 3-3

Structural Analysis Report

Page 23
Reinforcement Detailing Summary
Beam reinforcement

Structural Analysis Report

Page 24
 End
  Section mid Section Location
Ground 2-16dia+1-

Provide 8mm dia shear reinforcement at 4"

spacing at end and 6" spacing at middle
floor 12dia 2-16dia Top
2-16dia+1-
  12dia 2-16dia Bottom
2-16dia+1-
1st 12dia 2-16dia Top
2-16dia+1-
  12dia 2-16dia Bottom

Top floor 3-12dia 3-12dia Top

  3-12dia 3-12dia Bottom

Tie beam 3-12dia 3-12dia Top

  3-12dia 3-12dia Bottom

Column

Reinforcement ties

column Size GF 1st Top

4-

Provide confinement bar at 3" spacing and shear reinforcement at

20mm
4-
A1,A2,A3 1’x1’ 8-20mm 16mm

-20mm
-20mm 4-
A4 1’x1’ 4-16mm 16mm
4- 4-
20mm 12mm
4" c/c spacing

B1,B3,C1, 4- 4-
C2 1’x1’ 8-20mm 16mm 16mm
4-
20mm
4- 8-
B2 1’x1’ 8-20mm 16mm 16mm
4-
12mm
4-20mm 8- 4-
B4 1’x1’ 4-16mm 16mm 16mm

4- 4-
4-20mm 20mm 12mm
C3 1’x1’ 4-16mm 4- 4-

Structural Analysis Report

Page 25
 16mm 16mm
4- 4-
12mm 12mm
4-20mm 4- 4-
C4 1’x1’ 4-16mm 16mm 16mm

Slab reinforcement
shorter
span longer
span Thickness

8mm @
150
8mm @
150m 125mm

Footing Reinforcement
Spaci
Footing L B H ng  
12mm
@
F1 5'0" 5'0" 1’8" 100 Bothways
12mm
@
F2 5'6" 5'0" 1’8" 100 Bothways
12mm
@
F3 5'6" 5'0" 1’8" 100 Bothways

Design of Elements

The design of all structural elements is done using ‘Limit State Method’. All relevant Limit State is
considered in design to ensure adequate safety and serviceability.

Structural Analysis Report

Page 26
The design includes design for durability, construction and use in service should be considered as a
whole. The realization of design objectives requires compliance with clearly defined standards for
materials, production, workmanship, and also maintenance and use of structure in service.

This section includes all the design process of sample calculation for a single element as column,
beam, slab and foundation.

1) Design of Critical Column

IS 456:2000 Column Section Design

Column Element Details Type: Ductile Frame (Summary)

Level Element Unique Name Section ID Combo ID Station Loc Length (mm) LLRF
Story2 C6 81 Col 1'x1' Comb6 0 2844.8 0.734

Section Properties
b (mm) h (mm) dc (mm) Cover (Torsion) (mm)
300 300 60 30

Material Properties
Ec (MPa) fck (MPa) Lt.Wt Factor (Unitless) fy (MPa) fys (MPa)
22360.68 20 1 500 500

Design Code Parameters

ɣC ɣS
1.5 1.15

Axial Force and Biaxial Moment Design For Pu , Mu2 , Mu3

Design Pu Design Mu2 Design Mu3 Minimum M2 Minimum M3 Rebar Area Rebar %
kN kN-m kN-m kN-m kN-m mm² %
208.3182 11.1554 62.9005 4.1664 4.1664 2002 2.22

Axial Force and Biaxial Moment Factors

K Factor Length Initial Moment Additional Moment Minimum Moment
Unitless mm kN-m kN-m kN-m
Major 1.895444 2544.8 21.929 8.078 4.1664

Structural Analysis Report

Page 27
 K Factor Length Initial Moment Additional Moment Minimum Moment
Unitless mm kN-m kN-m kN-m
Bend(M3)
Minor
1.587505 2544.8 2.1956 5.6665 4.1664
Bend(M2)

Shear Design for Vu2 , Vu3

Shear Vu Shear Vc Shear Vs Shear Vp Rebar Asv /s
kN kN kN kN mm²/m
Major, Vu2 39.4703 67.7107 28.8002 36.8646 332.53
Minor, Vu3 26.7873 67.7107 28.8002 26.7873 332.53

Joint Shear Check/Design

Joint Shear Shear Shear Shear Joint Shear
Force VTop Vu,Tot Vc Area Ratio
kN kN kN kN cm² Unitless
Major Shear, Vu2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Minor Shear, Vu3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

(1.1) Beam/Column Capacity Ratio

Major Ratio Minor Ratio
N/A N/A

Additional Moment Reduction Factor k (IS 39.7.1.1)

Ag Asc Puz Pb Pu k
cm² cm² kN kN kN Unitless
900 20 1560.7577 261.4743 208.3182 1

Additional Moment (IS 39.7.1) (Part 1 of 2)

Consider Length Section KL/Depth KL/Depth KL/Depth
Ma Factor Depth (mm) Ratio Limit Exceeded
Major Bending (M3 ) Yes 0.895 300 16.078 12 Yes
Minor Bending (M2 ) Yes 0.895 300 13.466 12 Yes

Additional Moment (IS 39.7.1) (Part 2 of 2)

Ma
Moment (kN-m)
8.078
5.6665

Notes:
N/A: Not Applicable
N/C: Not Calculated

Structural Analysis Report

Page 28
N/N: Not Needed

2) Design of Critical Beam

IS 456:2000 Beam Section Design

Beam Element Details Type: Ductile Frame (Summary)

Level Element Unique Name Section ID Combo ID Station Loc Length (mm) LLRF
Beam
Story1 B16 67 Comb9 133.1 3327.4 1
9''x12''

Section Properties
b (mm) h (mm) bf (mm) ds (mm) dct (mm) dcb (mm)
230 300 230 0 60 60

Material Properties
Ec (MPa) fck (MPa) Lt.Wt Factor (Unitless) fy (MPa) fys (MPa)
22360.68 20 1 500 500

Design Code Parameters

ɣC ɣS
1.5 1.15

Factored Forces and Moments

Factored Factored Factored Factored
Mu3 Tu Vu2 Pu
kN-m kN-m kN kN
-37.07 0.3605 42.7574 0.7592

Design Moments, Mu3 & Mt

Factored Factored Positive Negative
Moment Mt Moment Moment
kN-m kN-m kN-m kN-m
-37.07 0.4887 0 -37.5587

Structural Analysis Report

Page 29
 Design Moment and Flexural Reinforcement for Moment, Mu3 & Tu
Design Design -Moment +Moment Minimum Required
-Moment +Moment Rebar Rebar Rebar Rebar
kN-m kN-m mm² mm² mm² mm²
Top (+2 Axis) -37.5587 411 0 411 148
Bottom (-2 Axis) 0 206 0 0 206

Shear Force and Reinforcement for Shear, Vu2 & Tu

Shear Ve Shear Vc Shear Vs Shear Vp Rebar Asv /s
kN kN kN kN mm²/m
48.6265 30.8681 22.08 24.9789 254.94

Torsion Force and Torsion Reinforcement for Torsion, Tu & VU2

Tu Vu Core b1 Core d1 Rebar Asvt /s
kN-m kN mm mm mm²/m
0.3605 42.7574 130 200 275.39

Reinforcement Details along Grid A-A

Structural Analysis Report

Page 30
 Reinforcement Details along Grid B-B

Structural Analysis Report

Page 31
 Reinforcement Details along Grid C-C

Structural Analysis Report

Page 32
 Reinforcement Details at story 1 (2.84)

Structural Analysis Report

Page 33
 Reinforcement Details at story 2 (5.68m)

Structural Analysis Report

Page 34
 Maximum Story Displacement
Summary Description

Structural Analysis Report

Page 35
This is story response output for a specified range of stories and a selected load case or load
combination.

Input Data
Name StoryResp1
Display Type Max story displ Story Range All Stories
Load Case EQy Top Story Story3
Output Type Not Applicable Bottom Story Base

Plot

Tabulated Plot Coordinates

Story Response Values

Structural Analysis Report

Page 36
 Story Elevation Location X-Dir Y-Dir
m mm mm
Story3 8.5344 Top 1.775 12.509
Story2 5.6896 Top 2.313 9.739
Story1 2.8448 Top 0.873 4.38
Base 0 Top 0 0

Maximum Story Drifts

Summary Description
This is story response output for a specified range of stories and a selected load case or load
combination.

Input Data
Name StoryResp1
Display Type Max story drifts Story Range All Stories
Load Case EQy Top Story Story3
Output Type Not Applicable Bottom Story Base

Structural Analysis Report

Page 37
Plot

Tabulated Plot Coordinates

Story Response Values
Story Elevation Location X-Dir Y-Dir
m
Story3 8.5344 Top 0.000044 0.001123
Story2 5.6896 Top 0.000427 0.00179
Story1 2.8448 Top 0.000246 0.001484
Base 0 Top 0 0

Annexes

Structural Analysis Report

Page 38
 I) Slab Design
II) Staircase Design
III) Foundation Design
a) Strap Foundation Design
b) Isolated Footing

Structural Analysis Report

Page 39