Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SSRN Id2142977
SSRN Id2142977
By
Duru, Onyekachi Wisdom Ceazar*
Readers are reminded that this work is protected by copyright. While they
are free to use the ideas expressed in it, they may not copy, distribute or
publish the work or part of it, in any form, printed, electronic or otherwise,
except for reasonable quoting, clearly indicating the source. Readers are
permitted to make copies, electronically or printed, for personal and
classroom use.
Abstract
Electronic
Electroniccopy
copyavailable
availableat:
at:https://ssrn.com/abstract=2142977
http://ssrn.com/abstract=2142977
2
Introduction
attaining finality of opinion in this area of study perhaps lies with fact that the
sanctions.
order hand, international law lack these basic features with the result that it
falls, prey to the persistent doubt that international law is not really law. At
denied. It is the virtue namely the binding character of international law that
Electronic
Electroniccopy
copyavailable
availableat:
at:https://ssrn.com/abstract=2142977
http://ssrn.com/abstract=2142977
3
debate are the various illuminating theories each seeking to place the
international and municipal law must take place within the context of a clear
theories espoused different persuasive basis upon which they sought to justify
their views. However, none of the theories are immune from limitations.
the light of the relationship between international law and municipal law. In
other words, the aim of this work is to highlight the different approaches of
states, three of which will be monist and the other three of which will be
dualist.
International Law
defined as:
The dictionary further states, at the same place, that the concept is also
termed “public international law; law of nations; law of nature and nations;
jus gentium; jus gentium publicum; jus inter gentes; foreign-relations law;
interstate law between states (the word state in the latter two phrases being
described as the law or rules that regulate the conduct of states and other
personality.
has changed with time from the traditional conception2 to a modern approach
1
B. A. Garner (Ed. in Chief), Black’s Law Dictionary Eight Edition (United States: Thomson West, 2004) at
835. See also, I. M. O Nwabuoku, “International Law vis-à-vis Municipal Law: A Close Look at
ABACHA v. FAWEHINMI” (2007) 2 Igbinedion University Law Journal 152.
2
See U. O. Umozurike, Introduction to International Law Second Edition (Ibadan: Spectrum Books
Limited, 1999) at 1. See also Denning L. J. in Trendtex Trading Corporation v. Central Bank of Nigeria
(1977) 1 ALLER 801 at 901-2, where the Law Lord defined international as “the sum of rules or usages
which civilized states have agreed shall be binding upon them in their dealings with one another…”. See
which recognizes the continuous expansion of the scope, subject and subject-
materials and processes out of which the rules and principles regulating the
Municipal Law
The Black’s Law Dictionary,4 defines the term “Municipal Law” as:
also, L. Oppenheim, International Law (New York: Longmans, Green & Co., 1905) at 1-2, where
international law was defined as the name for the “body of customary and conventional rules which are
considered legally binding by civilized states in their intercourse with each other.” He added that it is “a
law for the intercourse of states with one another, not a law for individuals” and that it is “a law between,
not above, the single states”. See also the definition by E. C. Stowell, International Law (New York: Holt,
1931) at 10, thus, “international law embodies certain rules relating to human relations throughout the
world, which are generally observed by mankind and enforced primarily through the agency of
governments of the independent communities into which humanity is divided.” In P. C. Jessup, A Modern
Law of Nations (New York: Macmillan, 1948) at 15-16, international law was defined “as law applicable
to relations between states.” Compare P. C. Jessup, Transnational Law (New Haven: Yale University
Press, 1956), where the author recognized the individuals are becoming subject to international law. See
also, M. S. McDougal, et. al., Studies in Public World Order (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1960)
and M. S. McDougal, “International Law, Power and Policy: A Contemporary Conception” (1953) 82 Re-
cueil des Cours 137. Additionally, see the definition in C. G. Fenwick, International Law (New York:
Century, 1924) 24 quoted with approval by N. D. Palmer & H. C. Perkins, International Relations: The
World Community in Transition Third Revised Edition (Delhi: Virender Kumar Arya for A. I. T. B. S.
Publishers & Distributors, 2007) at 266-267.
3
See generally Article 38(1) of the Statue of the International Court of Justice which is widely recognized as
the most authoritative statement as to the source of International Law.
4
B. A. Garner, op. cit. at 1043.
municipal law governs the domestic aspect of government and deals with
states.6
Monism
between international and domestic law. Exponents of this theory are referred
to as monists. Monists hold that International Law and State Law share a
common origin-namely law.7 Thus, the duo is the two branches of unified
the other. The broad thrust of the theory of monism is that both international
legal order. Thus, International Law is directly applicable in the national legal
5
See M. Akehurst, A Modern Introduction to International Law (New Delhi: George Allen & Unwin
[Publishers] Ltd, 1990) at 43.
6
See, M. N. Shaw, International Law Fifth Edition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003) at 121.
Also, it is instructive to point out that although states are the primary subject to international law, the
development of international relations in recent times, especially the setting-up of a great number of
international institutions and the international recognition of the rights and duties of groups of individuals
have to a large extent brought these entities within its purview.
7
See, S. O. Ayewa, “The Symmetry between International Law and Municipal Law: A Nigerian
Perspective” (2004) 1 DELSU Public Law Series, 85; see generally also, I. Brownlie, Principles of Public
International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979) at 32-34.
8
See, R. F. Oppong, “Re-Imaging International Law: An Examination of Recent Trends in the Reception of
International Law into National Legal Systems on Africa” (2006) 30(2) International Law Journal 2.
Dualism
International Law and Domestic Law. At the heart of the theory of dualism
lies the premise that international law and municipal law are two separate and
distinct orders, in their objects and spheres of operation, such that the norms
of one would not operate within the realm of the other without a positive act
may benefit from or rely on the international (now national) law. To the
dualist, international law could not claim supremacy within the domestic
legal system although it was supreme in the international law legal system.11
Constitution
legal instrument giving rise, amongst other things to individual rights capable
limitations under the constitution are identified as having been created, their
are made and not merely an Act or a Law. This is in tandem with the opinion
13
See the Nigerian Case of P.D.P. v. INEC (2001) FWLR (Pt. 31) 2735 at 2776-2777.
14
(1980) AC. 319 at 329. See also, the case of Anaka v. Lokoja (2001) 4 NWLR (Pt. 702) 178 where the
Nigerian Court of Appeal described a constitution as the grundnorm of the country. Also, in Attorney-
General of Ondo State v. Attorney-General of The Federation & 35 Ors. (2002) 9 NWLR (Pt. 772) 222 at
418-419; Uwaifo, JSC while describing the Nigerian constitution opined as follows: “it must be
recognized that our constitution is an organic instrument which confers power and also creates rights and
limitations. It is the Supreme Law in which certain first principles of fundamental nature are established.
15
As he then was.
16
(2001) 8 NWLR (Pt. 745) 295 at 350.
is its fundamental or organic law through which all law, authorities or actions
describes and limits exercise of powers rights and obligations and the modes
relations between individuals within a state and between individuals and the
state. Also, they differ altogether in their judicial processes. Both are usually
law.18 What is true of the judicial function is also true of the executive
depended for its enforcement upon the initiative of the injured party. Most
17
See generally, S. Tar. Hon., Constitutional Law and Jurisprudence in Nigeria (Port Harcourt: Pearl
Publishers, 2004) at 4.
18
See D. N. Palmer and C. H. Perkins, International Relations: The World Community in Transition Third
Revised Edition (India: A.I.T.B.S Publishers & Distributors, 2007) at 274.
19
Ibid.
not be denied that there is gradual convergence of interest and the ultimate
common goal manifests itself include human rights law,20 environmental law
national law and international law.21 Thus, international law and national law
20
See generally, C. M. Peter, “Fundamental Rights and Freedoms in Kenya: A Review Essay” (1991) 3(1)
AJICL 64; E. C. Ibezim, “Right to Life under International Human Rights Law: A Gender Perspective”
(2008) 10 ABSU L.J. 16; M. O. Unegbu, “Resolving the Dilemma of Hierarchy Between the African
Charter and the Nigerian Constitution” (1999) 6(1) ABSU L.J. 13; M. O. Unegbu, “Human Rights
Enforcement in Nigeria: Some Procedural Problems” (1996) 1 ABSU L. J. 1; U. O. Umozuruike, “The
African Charter and National Laws: The Issue of Supremacy” (2003) 8 ABSULJ 1; A. O. Enabulele,
“Unification of the Applications of Principles of International Law in the Municipal Realm: A Challenge
for Contemporary International Law” (2008) 11(1) & (2) Uniben L.J. 125.; R. C. Changani, “Chadian
Asylum Seekers and the Nigerian Refugee Law” (2009) 2(1) Nasarawa State University L. J. 14 at 21-22;
A. I. Funmitola, “The Right to Participate in Governance under International Law (2009) 2(1) Nasarawa
State University L.J. 25; G. N. Okeke, “Reflections on International Human Rights Law and Application
to Nigeria” (2004) 4(1) Unzik L.J. 163; I. Okorony, “International Human Rights Protection: Agenda for
the 21st Century” (2000) 7 ABSU L.J. 55, and B. Bowing, “The ‘Droit Et Devoir D’Ingerence: A timely
New Remedy for Africa?” (1995) 7(1) AJICL 493.
21
See R. F. Oppong, op. cit at 2.
22
See U. O. Umozunike, Introduction to International Law (Ibadan: Spectrun Books Limited, 1993) 29 at
29-32 where the learned writer discuses, ‘monism’, ‘invert monism’, ‘Dualism’, ‘Transformation and
Specific Adoption” Theories and Harmonization Theories.
theories: monism and dualism.23 This segment of this paper examines these
rural theories in detail and illustrates their practical application with examples
Monism
aspects of a single universal system. The theory posits that all rules of law
emanate from international or national law. Thus, the two systems are
the natural law school, include Hugo Grotius, a Dutch scholar and diplomat
law;24 Hans Kelsen; and Herschel Lauder Patch - all of whom have argued
that the international legal order is significant only as part of a universal legal
order which comprises the national legal order as well.25 The monist school
argues that not only do international legal rules and various national legal
23
Early treatises on these theories include J. L. Brierly, “International Law is England”, (1935) Law
Quartely Review 51:24; H. Kelson, General Theory of Law and State (Cambridge: Harvard University
Press, 1945); H. Kelson, Principles of International Law Second Edition (New York: How, Rime Hark &
Winston, 1966); L. J. Kung, “The Nature of Customary International Law” (1953) American Journal of
International Law 47 at 662; D. O’Connell, International Law Second Edition (London: Stevens & Sons,
1970) & J. G. Starke, “Monism and Dualism in the Theory of International Law” (1936) British Year Book
of International Law 16. For the more recent discussion of the theories, see I. Brownlie, Principles of
Public International Law Fourth Edition (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990); W. E. Butler, “Comparative
Approaches to International Law” (1985) Recueil Des Cours 190; A. Cassese, “Modern Constitutions and
International Law” (1985) Recueil Des Cours 192; J. Dugard, International Law: A South African
Perspective Third Edition (Kenwyn: Juta, 2006) and M. N. Shaw, International Law Fifth Edition
(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).
24
J. Dugard, op. cit. at 53-58
25
L. J. Kunz, op. cit. at 662-669; See also H. Kelson, op. cit. and O. Thosa, National Law and International
Human Rights Law: Cases of Botswana, Namibia and Zimbabwe (Alders hot: Ashgate, 2001).
French colonies27 adhere to monism. But, for the purpose of this paper, our
seriatim.
Namibia
latter explicitly recognizes international law and its role and function in
26
See I. Brownlie, op. cit. at 33 and M. Shaw, op. cit. at 100-101.
27
See for example, Article 151 of the Constitution of Burkina Faso, 1991; Article 45 of the Constitution of
Cameroon, 1992; Article 147 of the Constitution of Mali, 1992; Article 147 of the Constitution of the
Republic of Benin; Article of 132 of the Constitution of the Central African Republic. All these
constitutional provisions are modeled on Article 55 of the French Constitution of 1958. In general, they
provide that treaties or agreements duly ratified or approved shall, upon their publication, have an
authority superior to that of domestic legislation, subject, for each government or treaty, to application by
the other party.
The effect of this provision is to accord both the general rules of public
parliament. But for these two qualifications, the general rules of international
law and treaties are directly incorporated into Namibian municipal law. These
courts.
2000 & Anor,28 the Namibian High Court made the following remark
universal human rights norms and values are part of Namibia National Law.
28
(1994) (1) SA 407 (NM.SC)
(ACHPR), 1981, the Supreme Court of Namibia, in that case, noted the
following:30
ACHPR meant that the Charter was directly applicable in Namibia national
law. It directly created rights and duties for individuals in municipal law. It
Cultura 2000 & Another, the Namibian Supreme Court emphasized that;32
to Namibia where they were charged, inter alia, with treason and murder
Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 1951; the Convention Relating to the
Status of Refugees, 1951; and the 1967 Protocol Relating to the status of
Refugees, and to Article 144 of the Namibian Constitution. The Court stated
that:
According to the court, these instruments had not only “become part of
their basic principles have been incorporated into the Namibian laws.
Senegal
the law of the land and can be invoked as a cause of action before domestic
33
SAFLII 2004 (SC).
superior to that of the laws, subject for each treaty and agreement, to its
constitution.34
the municipal legal order of Senegal, the most “direct incorporation” does not
the Habre Case,35 where the convention was ratified and published but was
refused applicability.
greater command than the domestic laws. In effect, Article 215 of the
34
In any case, Senegal has accepted the primacy of International Law over National Law. See Para. 10 of the
Human Rights Committee’s Concluding Observations CCPR/C/79/Add. 82 of 19 November (1997) on
Senegal’s Report (accessed 27 September, 2011).
35
Suleymane Guengueng and others v. Hissene Habre (2002) AHRCR 183 (SECC 2001).
the question was whether a Democratic Republic of Congo Court could base
that it did not provide for punishment of war crimes. The tribunal applied the
provisions of the Rome Statute on sinful killing and pillaging to fill the
lacuna in the military code, judging that it was the legislature’s intention to
provide for the punishment of war crimes by military courts at the national
Rome Statute. It was by virtue of the monist approach of the 2006 Congolese
the Democratic Republic of Congo, that the tribunal directly applied the
All in all, the above constitutional provision gives the force of law to
International Law and determines its status within the national hierarchy of
36
Criminal trial judgment and accompanying civil action for damages, 26 March, 2006.
Dualism
perceives international law and national law as two distinct and independent
The two legal orders are separate and self-contained spheres of legal action,
they are separate legal systems, international law would as such not form part
of the municipal law of the state.38 Dualism argues that the two legal systems
First, the two legal systems are different in the particular relations that
they govern: state law deals with the social relations between individuals, and
international law regulates the social relations between states, who alone are
subject to it.39 In the second, sense, Triepel argues and is widely supported by
37
See generally, Maluwa, T.; “The Role of International Law in the Protection of Human Rights under
Malawian Constitution” (1996) African Year Book of International Law, p. 53; Morgenstern, F., “Judicial
Practice and Supremacy of International Law” (1950); British Year Book of International Law, p. 27:42.
38
This view has been propounded by positivist theorists such as Hegel, Anzilotti and Triepel, who have
invoked a consensual approach to international law to argue that the two legal systems are distinct in
nature.
39
Lindholt has noted that the classical dualist theory is based on the perception that two types of law
regulate different subjects, where national law operates with individual subjects while international has the
states as its subject”; See Lindholt, L.; Questioning the University of Human Rights: The African Charter
on Human and People’ Rights in Botswana, Malawi and Mozambique, Dartmouth: Ashgate, (1997) pp.
84-85.
other dualists, that the two systems have different juridical origins. The
source of municipal law is the will of the state itself, while the source of
principle.42 The latter principle commands that agreements between states are
especially treaty law, and underlies the basis for performance of treaty
two systems are so distinct that no possible conflict is possible. In case of any
gives the right to the state to determine which rules of international law are to
40
See J. G. Starke, and I. A. Shearer, Starkes International Law (London: Butter Worth’s, 1994) at 64.
41
Ibid.
42
Ibid.
43
Ibid.
44
See for example, Article 75 of the Constitution of the Republic of Ghana 1979. Article 231 of the
Constitution of South Africa, 1996; Article 211 of the Constitution of the Republic of Malawi, 1995;
Article 123 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Uganda; Article 12 of the Constitution of the
Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999; Article 111(B) of the Constitution of the Republic of Zimbabwe, 1993;
Article 238(4) of the Constitution of the Kingdom of Swaziland.
law does not become part of or have the force of law in national legal system
unless it has been expressly given that force by a national measure, usually a
be examined seriatim.
Nigeria
authoritatively that:
Court of Nigeria has observed in the case of General Sani Abacha and Others
government of Nigeria does not become binding until enacted into law by the
National Assembly and before its enactment into law by the National
45
(2000) 77 LRCN 1255. In that case the court cited with approval the case of Higgs & Anor v. Minister of
National Security & Ors, the Times of December 23, 1999; where the Privy Council opined that Treaties
formed no part of the domestic law unless enacted by the legislature.
Malawi
form part of the law of the Republic if so provided for in the Act of
parliament ratifying the agreement.” The tenor of this provision has been re-
counsel for the applicant had argued; inter-alia that the applicant’s rights
were also provided under the African Charter to which Malawi was a party.
The court, however, rejected this contention based on the fact that no specific
46
Abach v. Fawehinmi supra at 356-357.
47
(1996) ILRC 1. The case was discussed by T. Malawa, “The Role of International Law in the Protection of
Human Rights under the Malawi Constitute” (1953) 3 ATBLL 65-69.
legislation had been passed to incorporate the Charter into domestic law.48
Zimbabwe
does not form part of the law of Zimbabwe unless it has been incorporated
48
On the current potential effects of the African Charter on Human and Peoples Right on Malawi Law, see
L. Lindholt, op. cit. at Ch. 6 and 7.
49
The 1996 constitution, then in force provided in section 2(1) (III) that the government and the people of
Malawi shall continue to recognize the sanctity of the personal liberties enshrined in the United Nations.
Universal Declaration of Human Rights…”
50
As amended by the Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment Act, (No. 12), 1993.
For Lands, Land Reform And Resettlement And Another,51 accommodates the
The above dictum which suggests that international law and municipal
law is each supreme in its sphere of operation shows the dualist orientation of
Zimbabwe.
Conclusion
because, in practical terms, they may not purely determine the relationship
basic principle in most legal systems is that the internal application of treaties
countries, courts sometimes fail to effectuate treaties which are binding under
United State law. Conversely, in dualist systems, the court may sometimes
51
HC 3295/08 (Unreported)
52
See J. Dugard, “International Human Rights Norms in Domestic Courts: Can South Africa Learn from
Britain and the United States?” in E. Kahn, (Ed.). Fiat Justitia: Essays in Memory of Oliver Deneys
Schriener (Cape Town: Juta, 1983) at 221, 223-224.
courts’ use of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) before its
incorporation into United Kingdom (UK) law. In countries like the UK,
In the final analysis, the theories are relevant only in the specific
national legal system. Oftentimes, national legal rules are not well-defined
questions. But this is not to say the theories are insignificant: indeed, on the
between international law and municipal law. Most importantly, they will
53
J. G. Collier, “Is International Law Really Part of the Law of England?” (1989) International Law and
Comparative Law Quarterly at 924-925; H. J. Jackson, “Status of Treaties in Domestic Legal Systems: A
Policy Analysis” (1992) American Journal of International Law 310.