In my opinion evaluating the football player using only quantitative

information is not relevant or is not sufficient in trying to predict football

player and team performance. Even though using quantitative criteria is
the priority because use of statistics as an analytical tool allowed them
to model football players’ histories to better predict the future
performance of new football players. Using quantitative criteria just
measures the player performance for one or some players. If there is
some people who are good in such as batting average, it is not
involving his other unpolished potential.
The quantitative evaluation reports comprise one or more statistical
measure data. Apply analytic tools that would help them evaluate talent
in a more efficient and effective manner. Qualitative factors are also
critical in order to ensure that the manager makes the best decision by
trust what their scouts saw in the player (the qualitative), but they
needed to combine that with analytic research (the quantitative). When
the qualitative evaluation of the football player agreed with the
quantitative evaluation then the team had great confidence in bringing
that player into the organization. When the quantitative didn’t agree
with the qualitative it gave the team reason to rethink the decision. In
conclusion using quantitative measures really isn’t sufficient in trying to
predict football player because even though he is skillful football player
but if there is no cooperation and leading skill the whole team cannot
be success.