Professional Documents
Culture Documents
fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI
10.1109/LAWP.2015.2402292, IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters
1
1536-1225 (c) 2015 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See
http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI
10.1109/LAWP.2015.2402292, IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters
2
with and without microstrip resonators are provided. For B. Frequency Selective Surface
comparisons, the reference antenna operating at 5GHz is Based on the above approach, in-band RCS reduction can be
designed. For a microstrip antenna, a too small ground has an achieved. And the following discussions are aimed at reducing
impact on front-to-back ratio. Nevertheless, the microstrip the out-of-band RCS. As is known to all, FSS has the
antenna with a too large ground might be impractical in characteristic of band rejection. That is to say, the incident
engineering applications. Thus, the side length of the ground is wave within the FSS’s stop-band will be reflected while the
chosen as about one wavelength (5 GHz) in free space. All incident wave outside of the FSS’s stop-band will transmit
antennas are printed on a FR4 with the thickness of 2.5mm and through the FSS without any obstruction. As a result, it can be
the relative permittivity of 4.4. Table I exhibits the detailed applied to RCS reduction. The geometry of each FSS unit cell is
parameters of the reference antenna and the proposed antenna. illustrated in Fig.3 and the corresponding parameters are given
in TableⅡ. Our compact FSS unit cell is based on a modified
version of the traditional square-ring FSS. In addition,the total
length of the compact FSS is approximately equal to one
sub-wavelength (5 GHz), which is the wavelength in the
substrate at 5 GHz. In Fig.4, it is obviously found that FSSs
present a characteristic of stop-band in the vicinity of 5GHz.
(a) (b)
Fig.1. Top view of (a) the reference antenna and (b) the antenna with microstrip
resonators.
TABLE I
ALL PARAMETERS OF TWO ANTENNAS
Parameters L l w
Value(mm) 50 18 12.7
Parameters w1 w2 d
Value(mm) 12.7 12.6 4.3
(a) (b)
Fig.2. Comparison of bistatic RCS of two antennas in (a) xoz-plane (TM plane
wave) and (b) yoz-plane (TE plane wave). Fig.4. S-parameters of the FSS cell.
1536-1225 (c) 2015 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See
http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI
10.1109/LAWP.2015.2402292, IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters
3
C. The Proposed Antenna Besides, the gain loss in normal direction (z-axis) is 0.4dB,
By properly optimizing the dimension of microstrip which is reasonable considering the energy leakage by
resonators, its operating band can cover the impedance replacing the ground with the FSS structure and slots.
bandwidth of the reference antenna, which means that in-band
RCS reduction can be achieved by microstrip resonators.
Therefore, the FSSs are aimed at reducing RCS at the frequency
out of the operating band of microstrip resonators. However,
compared with the stop-band of each FSS cell, the operating
band of a microstrip resonator is too narrow. Thus, it is difficult
to reduce RCS at the frequency within the stop-band of FSSs
but out of the operating band of the microstrip resonator. In
order to address this issue, six slots are utilized to accomplish
RCS reduction of the frequency band which cannot be achieved (a) (b)
Fig.6. (a) top and (b) bottom view of two fabricated antennas
by FSSs and resonators. The slots can be considered as
dipole-shaped FSSs, which have the characteristic of band-pass.
When slots are resonating, the incident wave can pass through
them without any obstruction, which results in RCS reduction.
The resonant frequency of the slots is 5.5 GHz, at which
microstrip resonatros and FSSs cannot contribute to RCS
reduction. In addition, the length is approximately equal to half
sub-wavelength (5.5 GHz), which is the wavelength in the
substrate at 5.5 GHz. After appropriate optimization, the length
and width of each slot are 15.6mm and 0.3mm, respectively.
With the delicate analysis and simulation, the geometry of the
proposed antenna is determined and depicted in Fig.5.
(a)
Fig.5. The geometry of the proposed antenna.
1536-1225 (c) 2015 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See
http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI
10.1109/LAWP.2015.2402292, IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters
4
REFERENCES
(a)
[1] Y. Liu, S. X. Gong, and H. B. Zhang, "A novel fractal slot microstrip
antenna with low RCS," in Proc. IEEE Antennas Propag. Soc. Int. Symp.,
2006, pp. 2603–2606.
[2] E. F. Knott, J. F. Shaeffer, and M. T. Tuley, Radar Cross Section.
SciTech Publishing, 2004.
[3] W. Jiang, Y. Liu, S. X. Gong and T. Hong, "Application of bionics in
antenna radar cross section reduction." IEEE Antennas Wireless. Propag.
Lett., vol.8, pp.1275-1278, 2009.
[4] C. M. Dikmen, S. Cimen and G. Cakir, "Planar Octagonal-Shaped UWB
Antenna with Reduced Radar Cross Section." IEEE Trans. Antennas
Propag., vol.62, no.6, pp.2946-2953, June 2014
[5] H. Y. Xu, H. Zhang, X. F. Zeng and H. Y. Han, "Novel monopole
antenna with low RCS for UWB application." in Proc. ICMMT, May.
2012, pp.1-4.
[6] Z. L. Miao, C. Huang, Q. Zhao, M. B. Pu, X. L. Ma and X. G. Luo,
"Design of a patch antenna with dual ‐ band radar cross ‐ section
(b) reduction." Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett., vol. 54, no.3, pp. 2516–2520,
Fig.9. Comparison of monostatic RCS between the reference antenna and the Nov. 2012.
proposed antenna for a normal incident plane wave with (a) TM polarization [7] Y. Q. Li, H. Zhang, Y. Q. Fu and N. C. Yuan, "RCS reduction of ridged
and (b) TE polarization. waveguide slot antenna array using EBG radar absorbing
material." IEEE Antennas Wireless. Propag. Lett., vol.7, pp.473-476,
2008
[8] P.K., Panda and D. Ghosh, "Mushroom-like EBG structures for reducing
RCS of patch antenna arrays." in Proc. ICMAP, Dec. 2013, pp. 1-4.
[9] H. K. Jang, J.H. Shin and C.G. Kim, "Low RCS patch array antenna with
electromagnetic bandgap using a conducting polymer." in Proc. ICEAA,
Sept. 2010, pp. 140–143.
[10] G. Simone, F. Costa, and A. Monorchio, "Low-profile array with
reduced radar cross section by using hybrid frequency selective
surfaces." IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol.60, no.5, pp.2327-2335,
May 2012
[11] D. Anders and A. Lind, "Extended analysis of rectangular microstrip
resonator antennas." IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol.27, no.6,
pp.846-849, Nov 1979
(a)
1536-1225 (c) 2015 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See
http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.