Professional Documents
Culture Documents
8, 2009 1275
(1)
TABLE I
RADIUS AND CENTRAL ANGLE OF EACH ARC PATCH
(2)
The first part of (2) is the structural mode scattering field, and
the second one is the antenna mode scattering field. is the re-
flection coefficient of load, and is the reflection coefficient of
antenna. and are the scattering field of the antenna the frequency range of UWB (3.1–10.6 GHz). The circular ra-
terminated with open-circuited load and short-circuited load, re- diating element gives the antenna good radiation performances,
spectively. In this model, the total antenna RCS can be obtained but large RCS. The maximum RCS value is in the direction that
easily through the open-circuit RCS and short-circuit RCS. is normal to the - plane, where the most threatening direction
is and the maximum radiation of the antenna happens.
III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS B. ITA
PCDMA and ITA are presented in Section III. Their charac- As illustrated in Fig. 4, an ITA with an offset ground patch
teristics, including the return loss, radiation pattern, gain, and is first proposed in this letter. The radiating element is designed
monostatic RCS, are presented and discussed. In addition, the based on the shape of insect tactile organ, which is simulated by
time-domain performance of the proposed antenna is also eval- eight arc patches. Each arc patch has a width of 1 mm. These arc
uated in measurements. In order to demonstrate the superiority patches are arranged along the -axis and are numbered 1 to 8
of the bionic antenna’s radiating element in RCS reduction, the with the increase of value. The distance between the adjacent
ground plane and dielectric substrate of the two antennas are patches is 3 mm, and the radius and central angle of each arc
chosen to be the same. patch are presented in Table I. Each arc patch is symmetrical.
As shown in Fig. 5, its measured bandwidth of 10-dB return
A. PCDMA loss is from 3.0 to 14.0 GHz. Its antenna radiation pattern mea-
PCDMA shown in Fig. 2 was proposed in [6]. In this letter, surements have been performed in an anechoic chamber at 3.0
it is chosen as a reference antenna for its good performances and 9.0 GHz in the principal cuts, - and -planes, which cor-
and wide applications. It is printed on an FR-4 substrate with respond to - and - planes, respectively. At each frequency,
the relative dielectric constant of 4.4. Fig. 3 presents its simu- the radiation patterns in the - and -planes are normalized. As
lated and measured return loss; the measured impedance band- seen in Fig. 6, the agreement between simulations and measure-
width of 10-dB return loss is from 2.8 to 12.8 GHz, which covers ments is very good. The bionic antenna may be seen as a planar
JIANG et al.: APPLICATION OF BIONICS IN ANTENNA RADAR CROSS SECTION REDUCTION 1277
Fig. 6. Simulated and measured radiation patterns of ITA: (a) 3.0 GHz, E -plane
(b) 3.0 GHz, H -plane (c) 9.0 GHz, E -plane (d) 9.0 GHz, H -plane.
Fig. 11. RCS comparison of PCDMA and ITA with matched load. Fig. 13. RCS comparison of PCDMA and AA.
IV. CONCLUSION
The radiation characteristics of PCDMA and ITA have been
studied both theoretically and experimentally. Their monostatic
RCS values are also simulated, measured, and compared. The
results show that ITA has lower RCS and better radiation char-
Fig. 12. RCS comparison of PCDMA and ITA. acteristics than PCDMA. ITA is a good UWB antenna with fa-
vorable radiation performances and attractively low RCS simul-
taneously. It is also a good example to demonstrate the feasi-
is the greatest or smallest one over the whole frequency band, bility of the proposed method. The superiority of the bionic ra-
which is different from narrowband antennas [7]. It is because diating element in RCS reduction is proved. Consequently, the
the frequency range is so wide that the dynamic range of the technique of applying bionics principle to antenna RCS reduc-
phase difference between the structural mode RCS and antenna tion is valid. This letter provides a novel direction to the future
mode RCS is large. This brings a challenge to RCS reduction of design of antennas with or without a requirement of RCS con-
UWB antennas because of their ultrawide impedance band. trol.
Simulated structural mode RCS values of the two antennas
are shown in Fig. 11. Measured total antenna RCS curves of the ACKNOWLEDGMENT
two antennas are shown in Fig. 12. Conclusions reached by the
results above are as follows. ITA has lower RCS than PCDMA The authors are especially grateful to the Anechoic Chamber
in the whole band that covers the frequency range of UWB. An- of the National Laboratory of Antennas and Microwave Tech-
tenna mode scattering is related to the antenna gain. The average nology of China for providing measuring facilities.
value of the gain of ITA is larger than that of PCDMA, which
leads to the result that the antenna mode RCS of ITA is larger REFERENCES
than that of PCDMA. Hence, the RCS of ITA is reduced mainly [1] E. F. Knott et al., Radar Cross Section, 2nd ed. Raleigh, NC: SciTech,
due to the reduced structural mode RCS, which is caused by the 2004.
relatively smaller geometrical size. The phenomena will not dis- [2] W. Jiang, S. X. Gong, and Y. P. Li, “A novel low RCS mobius-band
monopole antenna,” J. Electromagn. Waves Appl., vol. 23, pp.
appear at other angles in the -plane because the RCS reduction 1887–1895, 2009.
comes from the reduction of the structural mode scattering. [3] T. Hong, S. X. Gong, and W. Jiang, “A novel ultra-wide band antenna
However, the method of reducing the geometrical size of the with reduced radar cross section,” Prog. Electromagn. Res., vol. 96, pp.
299–308, 2009.
antenna is not generally applicable to obtain antenna RCS re- [4] S. Hu, H. Chen, C. L. Law, Z. Shen, L. Zhu, W. Zhang, and W. Dou,
duction. As an example, an annular antenna (AA) is presented. “Backscattering cross section of ultrawideband antennas,” IEEE An-
AA has an annular radiating element with an outer radius of 16 tennas Wireless Propag. Lett., vol. 6, pp. 70–73, 2007.
mm and an inner radius of 13 mm. The ground plane and dielec- [5] Y. Liu, S. X. Gong, and D. Fu, “A novel model for analyzing for ana-
lyzing the RCS of microstrip antenna,” in Proc. IEEE Antennas Propag.
tric substrate of PCDMA and AA are the same. The annular ra- Soc. Int. Symp., 2003, vol. 4, pp. 22–27.
diating element has a much smaller size than circular and bionic [6] J. X. Liang, C. C. Chiau, X. D. Chen, and C. G. Parini, “Study of
ones. Fig. 13 shows the RCS comparison of PCDMA and AA. a printed circular disc monopole antenna for UWB systems,” IEEE
As shown in Fig. 13, in low-frequency range, the RCS of AA Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 53, no. 11, pp. 3500–3504, Nov. 2005.
[7] D. Pozar, “Radiation and scattering from a microstrip patch on a uni-
is larger than that of PCDMA, although AA has a smaller geo- axial substrate,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. AP-35, no. 6, pp.
metrical size. This is because the scale of the antenna is similar 613–621, Jun. 1987.