Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Report 1
Report 1
RUPNAGAR-140001, INDIA
IIT Ropar
For
Submitted by
Rohan kumar
(2019MEB1289)
Supervised by
Dr. Satwinder J. Singh/ Dr. Manish Agarwal/ Dr. Dhiraj K. Mahajan
Table of Contents
1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................... 3
2 Apparatus Details/Equipment specifications .................................................................................................... 3
3 Experiments ....................................................................................................................................................... 3
4 Experiment 1: Analysis of Thin Cylinder under Open End Condition ................................................................ 4
4.1 Aim of the Experiment............................................................................................................................... 4
4.2 Theory Related to the Experiment ............................................................................................................ 4
4.3 Experimental Procedure ............................................................................................................................ 4
4.4 Observation Table ..................................................................................................................................... 4
4.5 Calculations ............................................................................................................................................... 5
4.6 Simulation Details ...................................................................................................................................... 5
4.7 Comparison of Experimental Results with Theory/Simulations ................................................................ 5
5 Experiment 2: Analysis of Thin Cylinder under Close End Condition ................................................................ 6
5.1 Aim of the Experiment............................................................................................................................... 6
5.2 Theory Related to the Experiment ............................................................................................................ 6
5.3 Experimental Procedure ............................................................................................................................ 7
5.4 Observation Table ..................................................................................................................................... 7
5.5 Calculations ............................................................................................................................................... 7
5.6 Simulation Details ...................................................................................................................................... 7
5.7 Comparison of Experimental Results with Theory/Simulations ................................................................ 7
6 Conclusions & Discussions ................................................................................................................................. 8
7 Additional Information ...................................................................................................................................... 8
8 References ......................................................................................................................................................... 9
Page 2 of 9
Experiment 1:Finite Element Analysis
1 Introduction
In this lab session, I have tried to perform finite element analysis(FEA) on simple solid mechanics problems
using Abaqus software for the simulation. Mesh convergence study was also performed.
3 Experiments
Page 3 of 9
Experiment 1: Finite Element Analysis
The simulations utilized in FEA are created the usage of a mesh of hundreds of thousands of
smaller factors that integrate to create the form of the shape this is being assessed. Each of those
small factors is subjected to calculations, with those mesh refinements combining to provide the very
last end result of the complete shape.
These approximate calculations are commonly polynomial, with interpolations taking place
throughout the small factors, that means that values may be decided at a few however now no
longer all factors. The factors wherein the values may be decided are known as nodal factors and may
commonly be observed on the boundary of the element.
• First we select parts, 2d deformable. Then we draw the geometrical shape of the beam.
• Then we input material property i.e. Young modulus and poisson,s ratio.
• then after creating independent instance of the part we have to define load and boundaru
conditions
Page 4 of 9
Experiment 1: Finite Element Analysis
4.5 Calculations
Page 5 of 9
Experiment 1: Finite Element Analysis
Figure 1: This is how a picture picked from any website need to be referred
using Insert Citation button in References in Microsoft word [1].
Page 6 of 9
Experiment 1: Finite Element Analysis
Page 7 of 9
6 Conclusions & Discussions
The final conclusion is that we are getting approximately the same results as in
theoretical calculations for the stress values. The result vary a depending upon
the size of mesh. Finer the meshing,more accurate the result will be seen.
Page 8 of 9
Experiment 1: Finite Element Analysis
8 References
[1] C. . Ross and J. . Kimber, “Plastic axisymmetric buckling of thin-walled circular cylinders under uniform
external pressure,” , 1996. [Online]. Available: http://osti.gov/scitech/biblio/382803-plastic-axisymmetric-
buckling-thin-walled-circular-cylinders-under-uniform-external-pressure. [Accessed 26 1 2019].
[2] S. C. Schreppler and J. W. Maxwell, “Scattering by a finite baffled thin elastic cylindrical shell: Theory and
experiment.,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 2341-2341, 1991.
[3] J. . Radcliffe, S. W. Schneider, L. C. Kempel and R. P. Penno, “Finite element-boundary integral simulation of a
conformal microstrip leaky-wave antenna,” , 2007. [Online]. Available:
https://scholars.opb.msu.edu/en/publications/finite-element-boundary-integral-simulation-of-a-conformal-
micros-3. [Accessed 26 1 2019].
[4] S. . Kim, O. . Scholz, K. . Zoschke, R. R. Harrison, F. . Solzbacher, M. . Klein and M. . Toepper, “FEA Simulation
of Thin Film Coils to Power Wireless Neural Interfaces,” , 2006. [Online]. Available:
http://nsti.org/publications/nanotech/2006/pdf/723.pdf. [Accessed 26 1 2019].
Page 9 of 9
Linear Tringular
Deflection No of nodes
355.1 156
406.9 275
448.3 539
465.1 864
Linear Quad
Deflection No of nodes
553.3 156
524.6 260
506 539
499.9 864
Quad quad
Deflection No of Nodes
491 157
491.2 205
491.5 392
491.5 425
quad tri
Deflection No of Nodes
443.9 93
475.1 195
477 255
485 539