Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Initially, the song entitled Manila essentially expr sees the visceral love of the artists' love for
Manila, of which, the lead singer, expresses the constant going back to the country in the lyrics:
Manila, Manila, I coming back to Manila. In proceeding lyrics, that were sang in the native
language of Filipino, the band of The Hotdogs express that they have left the country a number
of times, going elsewhere, but, as they have also accentuated in the subsequent lyrics, they have
sang that [Manila] is just like a woman who is hard to forget, and that it [Manila] will always be
the one they will be coming back home to. In other sections of the song, it is expressed that
Manila has always been looked for, that the band loves its noise, its jeeps – of which was of
pinnacle cultural identity of the Philippines at that time – that fly past them, and all the women
who are rather dashing. The song essentially explains to its listeners that: there is no place like
Manila, no matter where a Filipino goes, Manila will always be their home.
Espina Jr. on the other hand does argue, somewhat, with the lyrics expressed in the song of
The Hotdogs. In his poem entitled Manila, Espina Jr. essentially metaphorically represents the
disappointing relentless progression that often fluctuates but never prevails, of the city of Manila.
The final couplet of the poem goes respectively:
Now, both pieces portray their own representative opinion towards such an iconic place in
the country. One essentially gears toward an optimistic resolution, whilst the other falls on the
opposite end of the scale. The Hotdogs display nationalism, their essential love and favour for
their country over another. Espina Jr. on the other hand expresses mere disappointment in his
nation's inability to prove themselves as better than what their colonisers have thought of them
as. This is where both writers differ in opinions towards Manila. The Hotdogs refer to the
metropolis as a sense of identity, a piece of their identity to be more specific. A segment of their
lyric narrates:
Otherwise, Espina Jr. Portrays, rather not a lack of nationalism, but simply disappointment in
specific. For once, the Philippines has just been freed from its colonisers, yet its people are
incapable of obtaining successive and constant progression in their society. A portion of his own
goes:
———
Here we can see that the writer of the poem clearly does not display a lack of nationalism, but
rather he merely expresses that particular distaste in the lack of constant progression he would
have expected of his own nation, given that their era of being under colonisation has already
ended.
On another note, both pieces do provide a similarity. That is, that both pieces particularly
describe their own respectively representative portrayal of a very symbolic city in the
Philippines's identity overall. Indeed, both present their own ideas that inevitably condltradicted
each other, but that is the power of writing in itself. The Hotdogs simply wanted to display their
own nationalism through the use of constructing a message that embodied the essence of Manila
in their hearts. Whereas for Espina Jr., He did not compose the poem simply to belittle his
nation, but to serve as a wake up call to his peopl; that in light of the colonisers' departure, they
[the Filipinos] themselves must build their own empire – he did this through a rather satirical
approach which eventually led to a well-thought out emphasis on what he really intended for.