Professional Documents
Culture Documents
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-021-01920-x (0123456789().,-volV)
( 01234567
89().,-volV)
TECHNICAL NOTE
Abstract Tailing dams are structures constructed to covered by tailings after dam failure simulations using
create reservoirs for disposing mine waste. Due its small-scale physical modelling and hypothetical val-
relative lower costs, when compared with other leys with different slopes. The validation of the
alternatives for tailings disposal, this kind of structure mathematical model was made by comparing its
is often chosen by many mining companies. However, predictions with those obtained from small-scale
poor construction, malpractice, or negligence during physical models and with the Lucia’s Method as
the dam operation can lead the dam to fail, causing reported by (Lucia in Review of experiences with flow
tailings release affecting the downstream population failures of tailings dams an tailing impoudments,
and the local fauna and flora. This paper presents a University of California, Berkeley, 1981) results.
method based on the infinite slope theory that aims to
predict the potentially covered areas by the tailings Keywords Dam Break Physical model Numerical
released from a reservoir, in an eventual dam failure. model Tailings
This method was used to predict the affected area
List of Symbols
T. P. Lazarim S. H. C. Teixeira C’ Effective cohesion intercept
Graduate Program in Civil Construction Engineering, Su Undrained shear strength
Universidade Federal Do Paraná, Av. Coronel Francisco
Heráclito dos Santos no 210, Curitiba,
H Height of tailings
PR 81531-970, Brazil a Deposition angle of the tailings
e-mail: thais.lazarim@gmail.com FS Factor of Safety
S. H. C. Teixeira c Specific weight of soil.
e-mail: sidnteix@outlook.com csat Saturated unit weight
/’ Effective friction angle
T. F. de Souza Júnior (&)
Universidade Federal Do Rio Grande Do Sul, Av.
E Elevation of spread tailings (in segment i)
Osvaldo Aranha 99 – 3 andar, Porto Alegre, HNG Height of natural ground (in segment i)
RS 90035-190, Brazil HTi Height of flowing tailings
e-mail: tennisonufpr@outlook.com DEi Variation of tailings elevation
A. P. V. Mohseni
Xi Horizontal distance of initial segment end
Graduate Program in Civil Engineering, Florida Xi ? 1 Horizontal distance of final segment end
University, 256 Weil Hall, Gainesville,
FL 32611, USA
e-mail: amohseni@ce.ufl.edu
123
Geotech Geol Eng
123
Geotech Geol Eng
attractive, since the construction costs can be dis- fill cell. Decantation lakes are created allowing the
tributed along the time (SOARES 2010). solids to settle and excess of water is directed to the
The structure is initiated by constructing a starter opposite end of the cell to be eliminated. These
dam with compacted soil, and frequently operates techniques are better explained in some publications
during one or two years. The next rising stages can be such as USEPA (1994), McPhail and Wagner (1987)
constructed using compacted soil, mine sterile or even Vick (1983) and Fell et al. (2015).
tailings (Vick 1983). The construction method, the used material and the
There are three classical methods for tailings dam tailings disposal method are important factors that
rising: a) upstream method; b) center line method and influences the volume of tailings released during a
c) downstream method. There are many references in dam break scenario.
technical literature that explain these methods (Vick
1983; USEPA 1994; IBM 1995; HALLAM and 2.2 Causes of Tailings Dam Failures
DOREY 1995; Mular et al. 2002, Tanchev 2012).
Many dams around the world are constructed using a Rico et al. (2008) identified 15 different causes of
combination of the cited methods, according to recurrent dam failure. In many cases (39%), the
Oliveira and Abrão (2015). Haile and Brouwer failures resulted from a combination of different
(1994) describe the modified centerline method, which factors including weather conditions (heavy rains,
merges downstream method with upstream method, hurricanes, ice melting, accumulation of ice in the
resulting in somewhat like center line method. tailings dam, etc.) associated with overflow / overtop-
There are three main methods that can be used for ping, infiltration, foundation failure or poor manage-
tailings disposition in a dam reservoir. They can be ment of structures.
used isolated on in combination with one another. Azam and Li (2010) point out climatic factors and
These methods are a) Single Point Discharge; b) poor dam management as one of the main reasons for
Spigoting and c) Cycloning. the dam failures. Failures due to unusual rains
Knight and Haile (1983) present a classic work increased from 25%, before the year 2000, to 40%,
regarding the description of the subaerial deposition after year 2000. This can be attributed to recent
technique (spigots). Lighthall, Watts and Rice (1989) changes in climatic conditions, particularly in mines
describe the deposition methods by Spigoting and near the seas and / or located in equatorial regions with
Cycloning including comments about the of construc- high rainfall. Similarly, failures due to poor manage-
tion cells. These authors state that cell construction is a ment are responsible for 10% and 30% respectively for
method where the mud is hydraulically discharged in a the two periods. This increase indicates a hurry to
123
Geotech Geol Eng
exploit natural resources while compromising engi- MG, it was established that all dams raised by
neering standards. upstream method in Brazil should be decommissioned
ICOLD (2001) conducted a research aiming to up to the year 2021, as instructed by Resolution N8 4
identify causes of 221 dam failures around the world (Brasil 2019). The new regulations also require a more
and concluded that the three major causes of tailings rigorous monitoring of the PAD (Potential Associated
dam incidents are due to slope instability, overtopping Damage) and of the dam safety (BRASIL, 2020b).
and earthquakes. Most of the incidents occurred in
active dams and in dams constructed using upstream
method of rising. 3 Materials and Methods
Davies (2002) reports that, assuming a worldwide
inventory of 3,500 known tailing dams in operation The research summarized in this paper was developed
along the last 30 years (1970 to 2001), and the fact that in two parts. In the first part, a small-scale physical
there have been 2 to 5 failures per year, the annual model was built to simulate nine tailing deposition
probability of a dam failure is somewhat between 1 in scenarios by varying the thalweg inclination and the
700 and 1 in 1750. This annual failure probability does undrained shear strength of the tailings. In the second
not provide a favorable comparison with the desirable part, a numerical model was developed, based on the
probability of 1 in 10000. Souza Junior (2018) listed analytical equation of the infinite slope and an
several tailings dam accidents that had occurred interactive numerical approach. Finally, the results
comparing the volumes of reservoirs and the volumes were compared with those obtained using Lucia
released after rupture. (1981) Method.
The experimental part of the research consisted in
2.3 Recent Accidents in Brazil assembling a physical model of a hypothetical valley
over which mining tailings were released. The char-
In Brazil, two major accidents motivated changes in acteristics of the tailings flow in the valley, as the
the management policy of these structures. The first tailing slope and deposition profile, were evaluated.
accident was the Fundão Dam failure, which occurred
in Mariana city, on 5th November 2015. About 43
million m3 of iron ore tailings were released from the 4 Tailings Characterization
reservoir, causing the greatest environmental damage
in Brazil, polluting 668 km of water courses from Tailings of iron ore from a Brazilian mining company
Doce River to the Atlantic Ocean, killing 19 people was used in the studies. In order to adequately interpret
(Carmo 2017). Also, the tailings mud destroyed the the behavior of the material, laboratory tests such as
Bento Rodrigues district, the fauna, and flora along the specific gravity, Atterberg limits (liquid limit and
Doce river. The incident caused negative impact on plastic limit) and grain size analysis of the tailings
the region’s economy. were performed.
Three years after the Fundão tragedy, on January Sample preparation for characterization was per-
25, 2019, another dam of iron ore tailings, named formed according to ABNT 6457 (1986). The deter-
Córrego do Feijão’s Dam (Fig. 1), catastrophically mination of the specific gravity of solids was
failed in Brumadinho city. The rupture released more performed according to the procedures of DNER-
than 11 million m3 of tailings. Around 10 m high mud ME 093 (1994). The granulometric analysis was
wave moved 10 km downstream the dam, reaching the performed according to ABNT NBR 7181 (2016),
Paraopeba river, an important tributary of the São using sodium hexametaphosphate as a deflocculant.
Francisco river (Rotta et al. 2020). The event killed The tests for liquid limit (LL) and plasticity limit (PL)
more people than the Fundão’s dam failure resulting in were performed according to ABNT NBR 6459 (2016)
259 fatalities, with 11 others still missing. and ABNT NBR 7180 (2016), respectively.
After these accidents, new regulations and laws Slump Test were performed in the tailings under
were created to make tailings dams safer in Brazil, different moisture content. A curve relating the
such as Law 14,066/2020 (BRASIL, 2020a). After the tailings moisture content with its slump was obtained,
failure of Córrego do Feijão Dam, in Brumadinho- in a similar way as presented by Jung and Biswas.
123
Geotech Geol Eng
(2002), where a consistent correlation between slump undrained shear strength (Su) of 0,20 kPa, 0,15 kPa
and the moisture contents were found. Finally, the and 0,10 kPa were found, respectively.
undrained shear strength (Su) of the tailing was The Su values were considered adequate to be used
obtained using the Torvane and Mini-Vane tests, in the small-scale model, which was designed to have
based on ABNT NBR 10,905 (1989). a geometrical scaling ratio of k = 100 (prototype
Table 1 shows the results of the tailings geotech- dimensions / model dimensions). In this case, consid-
nical characterization tests, such as Atterberg limits ering the Cauchy similitude law, the same value of
and the specific gravity of the grains. The material scaling ratio (k = 100) applies to undrained shear
contains 19.4% of fine sand, 77.4% of silt and 3.2% of strengths. Therefore, the values of Su used on the
clay, being classified according to ABNT NBR 6502 model correspond to 10 kPa, 15 kPa and 20 kPa in a
(1995) as a sandy silt. hypothetical real scale prototype. These values of
The slump tests were performed with moisture undrained strengths are typically values found in
content ranging from 38 to 57%. Nine different tests tailings.
were performed to measure the lateral scattering of the
tailings and its deposition angle. Each test was
performed following the procedure described in 5 Small Scale Physical Modeling
NBR NM 67 1998.
With the data obtained from these tests, a curve The small scale model represents a hypothetical
relating the slump height with the moisture content valley. It was constructed with MDF sheets, eucalyp-
was plotted, as shown in Fig. 2. Orthogonal pho- tus slabs, EPS slabs, 1: 2: 3 (Cement: Cal: Sand)
tographs (Fig. 3) of the cone trunk of slump test were mortar, with sides of 1.8 by 1.5 m and height equal to
used to determine the deposition angles of the tailings 0.3 m, designed with scaling factor k = 100 (see
and its relation to moisture contend, as plotted in Figs. 6 and 7). The model was designed so that the
Fig. 4. slope of the main thalweg was equal to zero when the
Since the extension of the valley of physical model base was in the horizontal position. The slope of the
is known (2.34 m), using the deposition angles of valley bottom could be changed by rotating the box
tailings, it was possible to estimate the theoretical toe. It significantly changes the model topography, as
water content range for the tailings that could be shown in Fig. 7.
adequately used in the physical model. The maximum The physical model does not consider the presence
theoretical value for the moisture content was esti- of rivers or water bodies in the valley as well as flora or
mated as 60%. edifications. The Manning rugosity parameter was not
In order to perform the torvane tests, a 45 mm considered in this study, since the rugosity of the
diameter disk was used. For the mini-vane test, the surface has a very smaller dimension compared to the
number 3 spring was used, which has a torque equal to tailings flow height. Besides that, during the material
0.00172 N.m, as well as a vane with dimensions of flow, it was observed that the upper layers of tailings
12.6 by 12.6 mm. Figure 5, shows the results of these slide over the lower layer, in an internal shear
tests presenting the undrained shear strength as a mechanism. For the tested conditions, the shear slide
function of the moisture content. For moisture con- did not seem to happen on tailing-mortar interface.
tents equal to 60%, 73% and 86%, the values of The rugosity, nevertheless, can be a parameter with
higher influence in others non tested conditions,
mainly when the relation between rugosity height
Table 1 Characterization parameters of tailings and flow height is high.
Specific gravity 3.914 Nine scenarios were simulated, variating the slope
of the main thalweg and the tailings strength, adopting
Atterberg Limit Plastic Limit—PL (%) 19.2 different moisture contents, as shown in Table 2. In
Liquid Limit—LL (%) 27.3 each simulation, 120 L of tailings were launched
Plastic Index—PI (%) 8.1 during 5 min from the launching point of the model,
with a constant flow rate.
123
Geotech Geol Eng
123
Geotech Geol Eng
The evaluation of tailings spreading as a function of software Surfer, version 7.0. This allowed the gener-
thalweg slope was made from deposition profiles in ation of a drawing file in a format compatible with
three sections: AA, BB and CC, according to Fig. 8. CAD programs.
Sections AA and BB were selected to evaluate the From the results of reduced model simulations, the
tailings flow behavior in respect to the change in the deposition angles (a), flow height (HT) and scattering
landform and the slope acclivity. The main valley distance (L) were obtained. A summary of the data
(section CC) is the preferential path for the tailings, obtained is shown in the Table 3, where the values of
where it reaches greater spreading distances. Fig- the slope of the thalweg and the moisture content of
ure 9a, b illustrate the tailings spreading in the model the tailings, are presented. The thalweg slope values
for scenarios 1 and 9. varied from 0 to 4, so the results can be compared
To obtain the topographic surfaces, a terrestrial with computations using Lucias Method.
laser scanner Cyrax HDS 3000 (see Fig. 10), manu- The validation of the results from small-scale
factured by Cyra Technologies, was used. The physical models was done using the Lucia (1981)
readings were taken before and after the tailings Method, in which the input parameters are the tailings
release, in each of the nine scenarios. volume, the undrained shear resistance and the
After the scanner readings, the data were exported saturated unit weight of the tailings. Based on this,
to a data sheet with XYZ coordinates which was later considering a 0.80 m wide breach of a hypothetical
processed in an Excel spreadsheet and using the dam, the moisture content established in this study
123
Geotech Geol Eng
123
Geotech Geol Eng
Fig. 8 Hypothetical topography of physical model. a slope 0; b slope 2; c slope 4
Fig. 9 Simulation of scattering of the tailings after rupture—a scenario 1 (w = 60%, talweg slope angle = 0); b scenario 9 (w = 86%,
talweg slope angle = 4)
(60%, 73% and 86%), the values of saturated unit 6 Proposed Numerical Model
weight (csat ) and undrained shear resistance (Su)
presented in Table 4, the volume and strength curves, By evaluating the scattering geometry of the tailings,
shown in Figs. 11, 12 and 13, were obtained. A in the physical model, it can be verified that the tailings
comparison between results obtained from the phys- deposition height is considerably smaller than its
ical models and Lucia’s Method is presented in length, as well as that during the tailings flow, the
Table 5, where it is possible to note a good fitting upper layers of the material flowed over the inferior
between the data. layers until the flowing movement stops. Therefore, it
was considered that the limit equilibrium theory for
123
Geotech Geol Eng
Fig. 10 Planialtimetric survey from Laser Scanner—a Cyrax HDS 3000; b Laptop with reading processing software
Table 3 Data extracted Main talweg slope Tailing moisture content 60% 73% 86%
from the main valley cross
sections after calculation 0 Simulation 1 4 7
(CC)
Deposition angle – a 5.91 5.46 3.81
Flow height – HT 0.16 m 0.13 m 0.11 m
Spacing Distance—L 1.17 m 1.14 m 1.52 m
2 Simulation 2 5 8
Deposition angle – a 7.98 6.27 4.65
Flow height – HT 0.17 m 0.16 m 0.18 m
Spacing Distance—L 1.97 m 1.28 m 1.92 m
4 Simulation 3 6 9
Deposition angle – a 9.12 6.79 5.17
Bold indicates the Flow height – HT 0.20 m 0.22 m 0.22
identification number of the Spacing Distance—L 1.10 m 1.93 m 2.06 m
simulation scenarios
123
Geotech Geol Eng
0.30
0.20
0.40 HT = 0.26m
α = 7.00°
0.30
0.20
0.10 HT = 0.22m
HT = 0.17m α = 6.50°
α = 5.40°
0.00
0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 11.00
the deposition angle is approximately equal to 1 and elevation of tailings surface in each segment, as
the tangent value of the angle is approximately the follows:
same value of the angle, in radians. Given such As shown in Fig. 14, the elevations Ei . and Eiþ1 are
boundary conditions, Eq. 3 can be obtained: given by:
Su Ei ¼ HNGi þ HTi ð4Þ
a¼ ðradiansÞ ð3Þ
csat :H
Eiþ1 ¼ HNGiþ1 þ HTiþ1 ð5Þ
In order to evaluate the tailings spreading profile,
which relates the tailings surface elevation with the The variation of tailings elevation is, therefore,
horizontal distance, it is necessary to divide the given by:
horizontal axis iveral segments and compute the DEi ¼ Ei Eiþ1 ð6Þ
123
Geotech Geol Eng
0.30
0.20
0.10 HT = 0.22m
HT = 0.17m α = 6.50°
α = 5.40°
0.00
0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 11.00
Table 5 Comparison between the physical model and the numerical model of Lucia (1981)
Talweg slope Parameters 60% 73% 86%
Lucia (1981) Physical model Lucia (1981) Physical model Lucia (1981) Physical model
123
Geotech Geol Eng
Fig. 15 Model topographic survey and evaluation sections–a before tailing release; b after the tailing release
123
Geotech Geol Eng
Height - H [m]
evaluation between 0.15
deposition profiles of 0.10
proposed numerical 0.05
modeling and physical 0.00
modeling for Scenario 4– 0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40
Sect.1 Spreading distance - X [m]
Profile of numerical modeling Profile of physical modeling Profile natural ground
and Sects.1 and 3 presented a certain discrepancy • An estimation of the breach dimensions and the
between the numerical and physical models. released tailing volume is required as input data for
the model.
6.2 Assumptions and Limitations of the Proposed • The proposed model was developed considering
Numerical Method some simplifications, as no presence of water
bodies and vegetation along the talweg, no influ-
The presented method can be repeatedly applied in ence of surface rugosity and validity of infinite
other several radial sections from the point of rupture slope stability method when tailings stop to flow,
in order to obtain a more detailed spreading surface. assuming a regular bottom slope boundary.
The main characteristics and limitations of the model
are:
• Limited to slopes of thalweg equal to or less than 7 Final Comments
10;
• Disturbed undrained shear strength of the tailings This research was carried out, aiming to create a
(csat ) must be used in calculation; geotechnical prediction method to determine the area
potentially covered by the tailings, in a dam failure
123
Geotech Geol Eng
123
Geotech Geol Eng
Davies MP (2002) Tailings impoundment failures: are Mular AL, Halbe DN, Barratt D (2002) Mineral processing plant
geotechnical engineers listening? Tailing Geotech design, practice and control, proocedings Vol.2, 1 ed.,
20(3):31–36 SME, Littleton, Colorado, USA
DNER ME 093 (1994) Soil—Determination of the real grain Oliveira WL, Abrão P (2015) Disposal of minning tailings. In:
density. Distrito Federal, Brazil. (In Portuguese) Zuquette LV (ed) Environmental geotechnics. Elsevier,
Fell R, Macgregor P, Stapledon D, Bell G, Foster M (2015) Rio de Janeiro, pp 263–306. (in Portuguese)
Geotechnical engineering of dams (2 edition). CRC Press/ Rico M, Benito G, Salgueiro AR, Dı́ez-Herrero A, Pereira HG
Balkema, Leiden, p 1348 (2008) Reported tailings dam failures: the european inci-
Haile JP, Brouwer KJ (1994) Modified centerline construction dents in the worldwide context. J Hazard Mater
of tailings embankments, 3rd International conference on 152(1–3):846–852
environmental issues and tailing management in energy Rotta LHS, Alcântara E, Park E, Negri RG, Lin YN, Mendes
and mineral production, 1–7 TSG, Souza Filho CR (2020) The 2019 Brumadinho tail-
Hallman DS, Dorey R (1995) Mine tailings deposition practices, ings dam collapse: Possible cause and impacts of the worst
liquefaction potential and stability implications.’’ Interna- human and environmental disaster in Brazil. Int J Appl
tional conferences on recent advances in geotechnical Earth Obs Geoinform 90:1–12
earthquake engineering and soil dynamics (1):451–456 Soares L (2010) Barragem de rejeitos. In: Luz AU, Sampaio JA,
IBM (1995) Tailings dams design, Bulletin 30, Nagpur, p 70 França, SCA Tratamento de Minérios, 5 edn. Rio de
ICOLD (2001) Tailings dams risk of dangerous ocurrences: Janeiro: CETEM/MCT, pp. 831–888
Lessons learnt from pratical experiences, Bulletin n8 121, Souza Junior TF de (2018) Study for the evaluation of tailings
Paris, p 144 released from the reservoir in a dam break scenario. Master
Jung SJ, Biswas K (2002) Review of current hight density paste of dissertation. Federal University of Paraná, Brazil. (in
fill and its technology. Miner Resour Eng Idaho Portuguese)
11(2):165–182 Tanchev L (2012) Dams and appurtenant Hydraulic structures,
Knight RB, Haile JP (1983) Sub-Aerial Tailings Deposition. 2nd edn. CRC Press/Balkema, Leiden
Proceedings of the 7th Panamerican Conference on Soil TechnoMine. Disponible in: http://technology.infomine.com/
Mechanics and Foundation Engineering 2:627–639 articles/1/1595/tailings.chile.pelambres/los.pelambres.
Linghthall PC, Watts BD, Rice S (1989) Deposition Methods for and.aspx. Access in: 1 Apr 2018
construction of Hydraulic fill Tailings Dams 4th Vancou- USEPA (1994) Design and evaluation of tailings dams: Tech-
ver Geotechnical Society Syposium Program, Vancouver, nical Report, Washington, USA
pp 1–15 Vick SG (1983) Planning, design, and analysis of tailings Dams.
Lucia P (1981) Review of experiences with flow failures of John Wiley & Sons Inc, Hoboken
tailings dams an tailing impoudments. Ph.D.dissertation. Yu D, Tang L, Chen C (2020) Three-dimensional numerical
University of California, Berkeley simulation of mud flow from a tailing dam failure across
McPhail GI, Wagner JC (1987) Disposal residues. In: Stanley complex terrain. Nat Hazard 20:727–741
GG (ed) The extractive mettallurgy of gold in South Africa,
5edn. Johannesburg: SAIMM, pp. 655–706
Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with
MME (2019). Mineral sector bulletin: 1st edn. Brası́lia, Brazil,
regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and
p 25. (In Portuguese)
institutional affiliations.
Moon N, Parker M, Boshoff HJJ, Clohan D (2019) Advances in
non-Newtonian dam break studies. Paste 2019. Perth
Australia
123