Nowadays, Most Large Companies Operate Multi-Nationally. To What Extent Those Companies Should Have Responsibility Towards Local Communities in Which They Operate?
While businesses need to make profits to survive, the document argues they also have social responsibilities to local communities. It says multinational companies operating in different countries should help develop those local societies in three key ways. First, they should preserve the local environment by limiting pollutants. Second, they should pay taxes on time to fund infrastructure and economic activities. Third, they should create jobs to boost local economies and reduce unemployment. In conclusion, international organizations have an obligation to help local communities thrive through various means.
While businesses need to make profits to survive, the document argues they also have social responsibilities to local communities. It says multinational companies operating in different countries should help develop those local societies in three key ways. First, they should preserve the local environment by limiting pollutants. Second, they should pay taxes on time to fund infrastructure and economic activities. Third, they should create jobs to boost local economies and reduce unemployment. In conclusion, international organizations have an obligation to help local communities thrive through various means.
Nowadays, Most Large Companies Operate Multi-Nationally. To What Extent Those Companies Should Have Responsibility Towards Local Communities in Which They Operate?
While businesses need to make profits to survive, the document argues they also have social responsibilities to local communities. It says multinational companies operating in different countries should help develop those local societies in three key ways. First, they should preserve the local environment by limiting pollutants. Second, they should pay taxes on time to fund infrastructure and economic activities. Third, they should create jobs to boost local economies and reduce unemployment. In conclusion, international organizations have an obligation to help local communities thrive through various means.
Nowadays, most large companies operate multi-nationally.
To what extent those
companies should have responsibility towards local communities in which they operate? In the globalisation process, a variety of organisations run on an international scale. However, I believe that these firms should not forget to place more of an emphasis on contributing to the development of the local societies where they are located in several aspects. The first responsibility that the multinational companies should take is to preserve the local environment. Companies of any size would exert negative influence on the region's air and water quality by running factories, disposing of waste to the waterworks or simply using airconditioners. Therefore, it is encouraged that they are active in placing restrictions on the level of the contaminants released and endeavouring to operate on an environmentally friendly basis. Second of all, paying tax on schedule is also an obligation. The tax money is used to upgrade the public constructions and regulate the socio-economic activities, thus facilitate people's life. Accordingly, not paying tax properly, the companies not only violate the national laws, but also indirectly deprive the inhabitants of a wide range of benefits they are well-deserved to reap. Finally, the major global companies can support the regional communities by creating jobs. Provided with career opportunities at a firm near their homes, the workers can not only save time and money for traveling but also find it easier to take care of their family. In a broader view, this action helps reduce the unemployment rate at the area, which boosts the local economic development in the long run. In conclusion, I believe that helping the local communities thrive should be considered a must for the international organisations, and there are many ways to implement the task. Các từ vựng tốt: Place (more of) an emphasis on smth (V): Đặt trọng tâm, nhấn mạnh vào cái gì Exert influence (collocation): Gây ảnh hưởng Waterworks (N): Chỉ chung các nguồn cung cấp nước cho một khu vực (sông, hồ) Dispose of N (V): Xả thải cái gì Place restriction on (collocation) = limit: Giới hạn, đặt giới hạn vào cái gì Endeavour = Strive = Exert effort (v): Nỗ lực làm gì On schedule: Đúng hạn Regulate (V): Điều hành, điều tiết Socio-economic (Adj): Thuộc về kinh tế xã hội Violate (V): Vi phạm
As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. To
what extent do you agree or disagree? Businesses have always sought to make a profit, but it is becoming increasingly common to hear people talk about the social obligations that companies have. I completely agree with the idea that businesses should do more for society than simply make money. On the one hand, I accept that businesses must make money in order to survive in a competitive world. It seems logical that the priority of any company should be to cover its running costs, such as employees’ wages and payments for buildings and utilities. On top of these costs, companies also need to invest in improvements and innovations if they wish to remain successful. If a company is unable to pay its bills or meet the changing needs of customers, any concerns about social responsibilities become irrelevant. In other words, a company can only make a positive contribution to society if it is in good financial health. On the other hand, companies should not be run with the sole aim of maximising profit; they have a wider role to play in society. One social obligation that owners and managers have is to treat their employees well, rather than exploiting them. For example, they could pay a “living wage” to ensure that workers have a good quality of life. I also like the idea that businesses could use a proportion of their profits to support local charities, Tham khảo thêm ebook “Hướng dẫn chi tiết & toàn diện IELTS Writing Task One” tại https://ieltsguidelines.com 20 environmental projects or education initiatives. Finally, instead of trying to minimise their tax payments by using accounting loopholes, I believe that company bosses should be happy to contribute to society through the tax system. In conclusion, I believe that companies should place as much importance on their social responsibilities as they do on their financial objectives. (285 words, band 9)