You are on page 1of 85

KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM

INVENTORY OF WORK ACTIVITIES


Company: SPRINKLER ENGINEERING PTE LTD Date: 22/OCT/2020
No. Location: Process: Work Activities Remarks
1 WOODLEIGH PROJECT Installation of fire protection systems Mobilization /Demobilization to site
Delivery of Materials to Site / Manually unloading of material from delivery truck /
Use of lorry crane to lift and unload heavy materials
Cutting of conduit pipes to sizes using hand saw
Threading the conduit pipes.
Mobilization of scissor lift to work area
Installation work using platform of Scissor Lift (SL)/Boom Lift (BL)
Installation Work / Using working platform
Pipe Bending
Cable Pulling / Trunking assembly
Drilling using portable electrical drills/ Battery operated drill.
Pipe hydrostatic test
Cutting / grooving of sprinkler pipes to sizes using grooving machine / fiber
cutter machine
Installation of pipes at riser compartment or retaining wall
Installation of underground pipe services
Soil excavation works using excavator
Working in hot condition or under the sun
Workers mental health and human factor

Housekeeping

Emergency Response

SG Secure

Hot works / Welding

Cutting steel pipe using hydraulic cutter

Installation Work using Mobile scaffold

Hoisting of Machineries / Materials / Equipment to Materials Receiving Platform


(MRP)
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

Material Handling from unloading platform to storage areas by manual handling /


trolley / pallet jack

Hoisting of materials (Using mobile crane)

Hoisting of materials (Using crawler crane)

Hoisting of materials (Using tower crane)

Hoisting of materials (Using lorry crane)

Hoisting of materials (Using mini crane)

Environment Factor

Painting of pipe works

Installation Work using Tower scaffold

Covid-19 outbreak

Workers returning to Singapore from home leave

Existing workers returning to work after 14 days LOA/SHN/Lock Down

Poor personal hygiene

Workers working on site who are staying in same dormitory with suspected
person with infected COVID19.

Workers working on site suspected infected with COVID19.

Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent


Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent


Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
/ tower crane Deploy adequate manpower. delivery timing to site
to lift and PPE: Nil
unload Seek buddy if the load is above 25kgs.
heavy Quarterly training on correct manual lifting method
materials to workers
PPE: helmet, googles, harness, hand glove to be
used accordingly
Sharp Cuts / fingers Elimination: Nil 3 2 6 Elimination: Nil 3 1 3 Site Supervisor YES
points or Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
crushed
edges from Foreman
load being Engineering Control: sharp edges should be Engineering Control: Nil
lifted covered with protective materials upon delivery Administrative Control:
Administrative Control: Close supervision by site
Awareness on hand injury. supervisor. Educate
Training for proper handling of installation workers on hand
materials PPE: Nil
PPE:
helmet, googles, safety shoes harness reflective
vest hand glove to be used accordingly
Toppling of Serious Injury Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Site Supervisor YES
lorry crane Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
/ Death to
/tower Engineering Control: Barricade the area of Engineering Control: Nil Foreman
crane person(s) unloading Administrative Control: Lifting supervisor
during lifting
due to soft Ensure that the outriggers are fully extended and Close supervision by site
ground or resting on outrigger steel plates supervisor
overload or Crane access constructed as per PE design & PPE: Nil
improper COS obtain
hoisting Administrative Control:
All personnel to stay clear from suspended load
and radius of swing
Do a pre-hoist check to ensure that the allowable
SWL at the specified radius to be hoisted is more
than the weight of load
Check that the load indicator, tilt/overload alarm is
working.
Lifting Plan briefing to group of workers
Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent
Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
Qualified lifting personnel (lifting supervisor, rigger
& signalman) appointed
Crane Operator to ensure no overloaded
PTW Lifting to be approved prior to start work
Follow Safe Work Procedures (SE-SWP-01)
Lifting plan in place
PPE:
helmet, googles, safety shoes harness reflective
vest hand glove to be used accordingly
Failure of Serious Injury Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Site Supervisor YES
lifting / Death to Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
machine or person(s) Engineering Control: Barricade the area of Engineering Control: Nil Foreman
Lifting gear unloading Administrative Control: Lifting supervisor
due to Lack Ensure that load radius indicator, over hoist limit Close supervision by site
of switch, automatic cut-off devices and warning supervisor.
Maintenanc signal is audible and in working condition PPE: Nil
e or Ensure that the outriggers are fully extended and
improper resting on outrigger steel plates
handling Crane access constructed as per PE design &
COS obtain
Administrative Control: Do a pre-hoist check to
ensure that the allowable SWL at the specified
radius to be hoisted is more than the weight of
load
Overload cut-off is not "bypassed"
All personnel to stay clear from suspended load
and radius of swing
Check that the load indicator, tilt/overload alarm is
working.
Lifting Plan briefing to group of workers
Qualified lifting personnel (lifting supervisor, rigger
& signalman) appointed
Crane Operator to ensure no overloaded
PTW Lifting to be approved prior to start work

Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent


Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
Follow Safe Work Procedures (SE-SWP-01)
Lifting plan in place
PPE:
helmet, googles, safety shoes harness reflective
vest hand glove to be used accordingly
3 Cutting of Sharp Cut to hands Elimination: Nil 3 2 6 Elimination: Nil 3 1 3 Site Supervisor YES
conduit Edges of or other parts Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
pipes to saw blades. of body Engineering Control: Engineering Control: Nil Foreman
sizes using
hand saw The pipes must be secured to the clamp
Safety Supervisor
Administrative Control: Administrative Control:
Training on safe use of hand tools to be Close supervision by site
conducted. supervisor Task Talk
Ensure equipment is checked daily for any meeting to remind the
damage workers
No loose materials to be kept after work activity PPE: Nil
PPE: helmet, googles, harness, reflective vest .
hand glove to be used accordingly

Dust Ill health and Elimination: Nil 3 2 6 Elimination: Nil 3 1 3 Site Supervisor YES
respiratory Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
problems Engineering Control: Engineering Control: Nil Foreman
Ventilation fan provided as necessary Administrative Control:
Close supervision by site Safety Supervisor
Administrative Control:
supervisor
Proper training and use of air mask
Training on safe use of hand tools to be PPE: Nil
conducted. .
Ensure equipment is checked daily for any
damage
No loose materials to be kept after work activity
Conduct toolbox meeting and LMRA briefing to
workforce.
PPE: helmet, googles, safety shoes harness,
Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent
Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
reflective vest hand glove to be used accordingly

4 Threading Threading Cuts to hand Elimination: Nil 3 2 6 Elimination: Nil 3 1 3 Site Supervisor YES
the conduit tools Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
pipes. Engineering Control: Engineering Control: Nil Foreman
Ensure the conduit pipes are properly secured to Administrative Control:
threading machine Regular Tool box and Pre Safety Supervisor
Protective cover of threading area to be engaged Task Talk meeting to
and properly secured remind the workers
Administrative Control: PPE: Nil
Training on the usage of the threading tools to be
.
conducted.
No loose materials to be kept after work activity .
PPE: helmet, googles, safety shoes harness,
reflective vest hand glove
Dust Ill health and Elimination: Nil 3 2 6 Elimination: Nil 3 1 3 Site Supervisor YES
respiratory Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
problems Engineering Control: Engineering Control: Nil Foreman
Ventilation fan provided as necessary Administrative Control:
Close supervision by site Safety Supervisor
Administrative Control:
supervisor
Proper training and use of air mask
Training on safe use of hand tools to be PPE: Nil
conducted. .
Ensure equipment is checked daily for any
damage
No loose materials to be kept after work activity
Conduct toolbox meeting and LMRA briefing to
workforce.
PPE: helmet, googles, safety shoes harness,
reflective vest hand glove to be used accordingly

Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent


Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
5 Mobilization Toppling Serious Injury Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Site Supervisor YES
of scissor lift during lifting Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
/ Death to
to work area due to soft Engineering Control: Barricade the area of Engineering Control: Nil Foreman
ground or person(s) unloading Administrative Control: Lifting supervisor
overload or
improper Ensure that the outriggers are fully extended and Close supervision by site
hoisting resting on outrigger steel plates supervisor.
Crane access constructed as per PE design & PPE: Nil
COS obtain
Administrative Control:
All personnel to stay clear from suspended load
and radius of swing
Do a pre-hoist check to ensure that the allowable
SWL at the specified radius to be hoisted is more
than the weight of load
Check that the load indicator, tilt/overload alarm is
working.
Lifting Plan briefing to group of workers
Qualified lifting personnel (lifting supervisor, rigger
& signalman) appointed
Crane Operator to ensure no overloaded
PTW Lifting to be approved prior to start work
Follow Safe Work Procedures (SE-SWP-01)
Lifting plan in place
Conduct toolbox meeting and LMRA briefing to
workforce.
PPE:
helmet, googles, safety shoes harness reflective
vest hand glove to be used accordingly
SL Bodily Injuries Elimination: Nil 4 2 8 Elimination: Nil 4 1 4 Site Supervisor YES
movement/ Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
Worker hit Engineering Control: Nil Foreman
Engineering Control:
by moving Ensure all safety devices within scissor lift in good Administrative Control:
Equipment working condition. Comply with speed limit. Safety Supervisor
Operator hand tools to be tied to strings, secured Close supervision by work
Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent
Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
to belt, and kept within the pouch at height supervisor.
Administrative Control: Only licensed & appointed PPE: Nil
operator to operate SL
Orientation of scissor lift operator to be done by
qualified person form supplier
Appointed banks man to guide the operator.
Conduct toolbox meeting and LMRA briefing to
workforce.
PPE: helmet, googles, safety shoes harness
reflective vest, hand glove
Working at Serious Bodily Elimination: No overloading. 5 1 5 Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Site Supervisor YES
height/ Injuries / fatal Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
falling from Engineering Control: Nil Foreman
Engineering Control:
height Administrative Control:
Lock the gate on the scissor/boom-lift. No
Close supervision by work Safety Supervisor
movement of SL/BL while working at height.
at height supervisor.
Do not stand on material or railing to over reach
Daily checks of supervisor WAH Supervisor
the work location.
in charge before work
Administrative Control: Adhere to operating
instructions. commence
Only licensed & appointed operator to operate SL Adhere to safe work
on top of the platofrm procedures.
Permit-to-work (PTW) for worked at height to be PPE: Nil
applied by WAH supervisor, submitted and
approved before commencement of work.
Safe work procedure (SWP) and fall prevention
plan (FPP) to be briefed before commencement of
work.
Ensure competent WAH Personnel to operate,
control and work on platform
Conduct toolbox meeting and LMRA briefing to
workforce.
PPE: helmet, googles, safety shoes reflective vest
harness,hand glove

Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent


Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
6 Installation Nip Hazard Serious cuts / Elimination: Nil 3 3 9 Elimination: Hands away 3 2 6 Site Supervisor
work using hands and Substitution: Nil from line of fire.
platform of fingers getting Foreman
crushed Engineering Control:
Scissor Lift Substitution: Nil
(SL)/Boom Cordon off working area
Engineering Control: Nil Safety Supervisor
Lift (BL) Lock the gate on the scissor. No movement of WAH Supervisor
SL/BL while working at height. Administrative Control:
Close supervision by work
Administrative Control:
at height supervisor.
Adhere to operating instructions. Daily checks of supervisor
Ensure competent WAH Personnel to operate, in charge before work
control and work on platform commence
Only licensed workers are allowed to operate / on
PPE: Nil
top of the platofrm
Permit-to-work (PTW) for worked at height to be
applied by WAH supervisor, submitted and
approved before commencement of work.
Safe work procedure (SWP) and fall prevention
plan (FPP) to be briefed before commencement of
work.
Do not stand on material or railing to over reach
the work location.
Banks-man to ensure no one goes near the
equipment.
Banks-mans to maintain safer distance from the
equipment.
PPE: helmet, googles, safety shoes harness
reflective vest hand glove
Working at Serious Injury Elimination: No overloading. 5 1 5 Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Site Supervisor YES
height/ / fatal Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
falling from Engineering Control: Nil Foreman
Engineering Control:
height Administrative Control:
Lock the gate on the scissor/boom-lift. No
Close supervision by work Safety Supervisor
movement of SL/BL while working at height.
at height supervisor.
Cordon off working area
Daily checks of supervisor WAH Supervisor
Administrative Control: Adhere to operating
in charge before work
instructions.
Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent
Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
Do not stand on material or railing to over reach commence
the work location. Adhere to safe work
Ensure competent WAH Personnel to operate, procedures.
control and work on platform PPE: Nil
Only license workers are allowed to operate / on
top of the platofrm
Permit-to-work (PTW) for worked at height to be
applied by WAH supervisor, submitted and
approved before commencement of work.
Safe work procedure (SWP) and fall prevention
plan (FPP) to be briefed before commencement of
work.
Conduct toolbox meeting and LMRA briefing to
workforce.
PPE: helmet, googles, safety shoes harness,hand
glove
Overhead Serious Injury Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Site Supervisor YES
Hazards Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
/ fatal
Engineering Control: Engineering Control: Nil Foreman
Install heavy duty pipe rack on scissor lift both Administrative Control:
edge and secure the pipe Close supervision by work Safety Supervisor
Loose materials to be kept in toolbox or working at height supervisor. WAH Supervisor
buckets Daily checks of supervisor
Cordon off working area in charge before work
Administrative Control: commence
Proper housekeeping of platform Adhere to safe work
before/during/after work commencement procedures.
Ensure competent WAH Personnel to operate, PPE: Nil
control and work on platform
Do not stand on material or railing to over reach
the work location.
Banks-man to ensure no one goes near the
equipment.
Banks-mans to maintain safer distance from the
equipment.
Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent
Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
Close supervision by work at height supervisor.
Conduct toolbox meeting and LMRA briefing to
workforce.
Adhere to safe work procedures.
PPE: helmet, googles, reflective vest, hand glove
Worker Serious Bodily Elimination: Nil 4 2 8 Elimination: Nil 4 1 4 Site Supervisor YES
caught in Injuries Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
between Engineering Control: Nil Foreman
Engineering Control:
installed Administrative Control:
Install 1500x25mm dia PVC piping on platform
material / Close supervision by work Safety Supervisor
corner to be used as early warning device
slab at high at height supervisor. WAH Supervisor
Cordon off working area
level Daily checks of supervisor
Lock the gate on the scissor/boom-lift. No
in charge before work
movement of SL/BL while working at height.
commence
Administrative Control:
Adhere to safe work
WAH supervisor procedures.
Adhere to operating instructions. PPE: Nil
Only licensed workers are allowed to operate / on
top of the platform
Ensure competent WAH Personnel to operate,
control and work on platform
Permit-to-work (PTW) for worked at height to be
applied by WAH supervisor, submitted and
approved before commencement of work.
Safe work procedure (SWP) and fall prevention
plan (FPP) to be briefed before commencement of
work.
Do not stand on material or railing to over reach
the work location.
Banks-man to ensure no one goes near the
equipment.
Banks-mans to maintain safer distance from the
equipment.
PPE: helmet, googles, safety shoes harness,hand
glove
Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent
Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
Toppling of Serious Injury Elimination: Avoid working or using scissor lift on 5 1 5 Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Site Supervisor YES
platform uneven ground Substitution: Nil
/ fatal
due to Substitution: Nil Engineering Control: Nil Foreman
uneven Engineering Control: Use of metal plates on top of Administrative Control:
ground uneven ground for leveling of platform Close supervision by work Safety Supervisor
Barricade working area and ensure cleanliness at height supervisor.
and free of debris Daily checks of supervisor WAH Supervisor
Banks-man to ensure no one goes near the in charge before work
equipment. commence
Administrative Control: Adhere to operating Adhere to safe work
instructions. procedures.
Only license workers are allowed to operate / on PPE: Nil
top of the platofrm
Permit-to-work (PTW) for worked at height to be
applied by WAH supervisor, submitted and
approved before commencement of work.
Safe work procedure (SWP) and fall prevention
plan (FPP) to be briefed before commencement of
work.
Conduct toolbox meeting and LMRA briefing to
workforce.
Banks-mans to maintain safer distance from the
equipment.
Cordon off working area
PPE: helmet, googles, safety shoes harness
reflective vest hand glove
7 Installation Falling Serious Bodily Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Site Supervisor YES
Work Using materials Injuries Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
platform Engineering Control: Engineering Control: Nil Foreman
ladder / Administrative Control:
Loose tools to be kept in a bag. Work area to be
fixed working barricaded with signage Close supervision by work Safety Supervisor
platform Administrative Control: Permit-to-work (PTW) for at height supervisor.
worked at height to be applied by WAH Daily checks of supervisor WAH Supervisor
supervisor, submitted and approved before in charge before work
commencement of work.
Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent
Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
Ensure competent WAH Personnel to operate, commence
control and work on platform Adhere to safe work
Appointed watchmen to keep a lookout for procedures.
unauthorized entry. PPE: Nil
Safe work procedure (SWP) and fall prevention
plan (FPP) to be briefed before commencement of
work.
Supervisors and workers to be briefed on daily
visual check of working platform in good condition
Conduct toolbox meeting and LMRA briefing to
workforce
PPE: All hand tools to be secured to lanyard.
helmet, googles, harness reflective vest hand
glove
Working at Serious bodily Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Site Supervisor YES
height / Fall injury / fatal Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
from height Engineering Control: Nil Foreman
Engineering Control: Loose tools to be kept in a
bag. Work area to be barricaded with signage Administrative Control:
Administrative Control: Close supervision by work Safety Supervisor
Conduct training on safe use of working platform at height supervisor.
Daily checks of supervisor WAH Supervisor
Workers should be briefed not to Modify any
working platform in charge before work
Do not step on mid or guard rail for work purpose. commence
Supervisors and workers to be briefed on daily PPE: Nil
visual check of working platform in good condition
Permit-to-work (PTW) for worked at height to be
applied by WAH supervisor, submitted and
approved before commencement of work.
Safe work procedure (SWP) and fall prevention
plan (FPP) to be briefed before commencement of
work.
Ensure competent WAH Personnel to operate,
control and work on platform
Conduct toolbox meeting and LMRA briefing to
workforce
Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent
Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
Adhere to safe work procedures.
PPE:
Must wear safety harness with double lanyards
and be properly hooked to a rigid point at all times.
helmet, googles safety shoes reflective vest hand
glove
8 Pipe Hand/finger Hand/fingers Elimination: 3 2 6 Elimination: Nil 3 1 3 Site Supervisor YES
Bending getting injuries Shall keep hands and fingers away from the Substitution: Nil
caught by moving parts of the pipe bending tools. Engineering Control: Nil Foreman
the bending
Substitution: Nil Administrative Control:
motion. Safety Supervisor
Engineering Control: Ensure the pipes are Condition of the pipe
properly secured to threading machine bending tools to be
Protective cover of threading area to be engaged checked regularly by
and properly secured users.
Administrative Control: PPE: Nil
All workers to be briefed and trained on the proper
operation of the pipe bending tools.
Conduct toolbox meeting and LMRA briefing to
workforce
PPE: helmet, googles, safety shoes harness
reflective vest hand glove
Working at Serious Bodily Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Site Supervisor YES
height / Fall Injuries / fatal Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
from height Engineering Control: Nil Foreman
Engineering Control: Ensure trunking / cables in
place are within working platform area Administrative Control:
Ensure the trunking / cabling are properly secured Close supervision by work Safety Supervisor
before pulling work started at height supervisor.
A proper working platform shall be provided for all Daily checks of supervisor WAH Supervisor
cable pulling works. in charge before work
Administrative Control: commence
All workers designated to work at height at 2m and PPE: Nil
above must have WAH course for Workers
Certificate.
Ensure competent WAH Personnel to operate,
Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent
Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
control and work on platform
No loose materials to be kept after work activity
Permit-to-work (PTW) for worked at height to be
applied by WAH supervisor, submitted and
approved before commencement of work.
Safe work procedure (SWP) and fall prevention
plan (FPP) to be briefed before commencement of
work.
Conduct toolbox meeting and LMRA briefing to
workforce
Adhere to safe work procedures.
PPE:
Must wear safety harness with double lanyards
and be properly hooked to a rigid point at all times.
helmet, googles, safety shoes reflective vest hand
glove
9 Cable Dust / Respiratory Elimination: Nil 3 2 6 Elimination: Nil 3 1 3 Site Supervisor YES
Pulling / Foreign problem/ eye Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
Trunking particles irritation Engineering Control: Nil Foreman
Engineering Control:
assembly arising.
Loose tools to be kept in a bag. Work area to be Administrative Control:
Close supervision by site Safety Supervisor
barricaded with signage
Administrative Control: supervisor
Ensure work area is free of construction dust or PPE: Nil
dirt
Use only properly inspected drilling tools and
protective goggles
No loose materials to be kept after work activity
Proper training of equipment to be conducted by
qualified person
Conduct toolbox meeting and LMRA briefing to
workforce
PPE:
Worker assigned for the task to wear safety glass,
dusk mask and face shield.
helmet, googles, safety shoes reflective vest hand
Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent
Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
glove

Working at Serious Bodily Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Site Supervisor YES
height / Fall Injuries / fatal Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
from height Engineering Control: Nil Foreman
Engineering Control: Ensure trunking / cables in
place are within working platform area Administrative Control:
Ensure the trunking / cabling are properly secured Close supervision by work Safety Supervisor
before pulling work started at height supervisor.
A proper working platform shall be provided for all Daily checks of supervisor WAH Supervisor
cable pulling works. in charge before work
Administrative Control: commence
All workers designated to work at height at 2m and PPE: Nil
above must have WAH course for Workers
Certificate.
No loose materials to be kept after work activity
Permit-to-work (PTW) for worked at height to be
applied by WAH supervisor, submitted and
approved before commencement of work.
Safe work procedure (SWP) and fall prevention
plan (FPP) to be briefed before commencement of
work.
Ensure competent WAH Personnel to operate,
control and work on platform
Conduct toolbox meeting and LMRA briefing to
workforce
PPE:
Must wear safety harness with double lanyards
and be properly hooked to a rigid point at all times.
helmet, googles, safety shoes reflective vest hand
glove

Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent


Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
10 Drilling using Exposed to Noise Induced Elimination: Nil 3 2 6 Elimination: Nil 3 1 3 Site Supervisor YES
portable Loud Noise. Deafness/ Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
electrical Engineering Control: Nil Foreman
Engineering Control: Use only properly inspected
drills/ Battery
drilling tools and protective ear plug when doing Administrative Control:
operated noisy works Safety Supervisor
Close supervision
drill. Administrative Control: PPE:
Proper training of equipment to be conducted by
qualified person Double hearing protection
if noise level is above
85db.
PPE:Ear plugs to be used when cutting pipes. NID
awareness in the tool box talk. helmet, googles,
reflective vest hand glove
Electric Burns / fatal Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Elimination: Ensure of all 5 1 5 Site Supervisor YES
shocks Substitution: Nil electrical tools, cables,
battery compartment are Foreman
Engineering Control:
not in contact with water
Electrical cables shall be hung high. source. Safety Supervisor
Check for damages to tools before start work. No modification of tools.
Administrative Control:
Substitution: Nil
Proper training of equipment to be conducted by
qualified person Engineering Control: Nil
Administrative Control:
All electrical tools shall be LEW certified.
Permit-to-work (PTW) to be applied by WAH Close supervision by work
supervisor, submitted and approved before at height supervisor.
commencement of work. Daily checks of supervisor
Safe work procedure (SWP) and fall prevention in charge before work
plan (FPP) to be briefed before commencement of commence
work.
PPE: Nil
PPE: helmet, googles, safety shoes reflective vest
hand glove
Rotating Cuts/Bodily Elimination: Unplug all electrical tools battery 3 3 9 Elimination: Nil 3 2 6 Site Supervisor YES
drill bits and injuries when going for breaks. Substitution: Nil
sharp Substitution: Nil Foreman
Engineering Control: Nil
edges.
Engineering Control: Administrative Control:
Close supervision by work Safety Supervisor
Dead man switch should be installed and in good
Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent
Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
working condition. at height supervisor.
All electrical tools shall be LEW certified. Daily checks of supervisor
Supervisors to advise worker on the hand in charge before work
placement before work commence. commence
Administrative Control:Only competent person to PPE: Nil
be appointed for operating the machine.
Permit-to-work (PTW) to be applied by WAH
supervisor, submitted and approved before
commencement of work.
Safe work procedure (SWP) and fall prevention
plan (FPP) to be briefed before commencement of
work.
No loose materials to be kept after work activity
PPE: helmet, googles, harness, reflective vest
hand glove
Drill falling Bodily injuries Elimination: Nil 4 2 8 Elimination: Nil 4 1 4 Site Supervisor YES
from height. Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
Engineering Control: Nil Foreman
Engineering Control:
Drill shall be secured with a lanyard/nylon string Administrative Control: To
check on the condition of Safety Supervisor
when working at height.
Area under line of fire shall be cordoned off the lanyard/nylon string
No loose materials to be kept after work activity daily before use.
Adhere to safe work
Administrative Control: Permit-to-work (PTW) to procedures.
be applied by WAH supervisor, submitted and PPE: Nil
approved before commencement of work.
Safe work procedure (SWP) and fall prevention
plan (FPP) to be briefed before commencement of
work.
PPE: Safety helmet, googles, harness reflective
vest hand glove safety shoes
Dust Respiratory Elimination: Nil 3 2 6 Elimination: Nil 3 1 3 Site Supervisor YES
generated problem/ eye Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
from drill irritation Engineering Control: Nil Foreman
Engineering Control:
Loose tools to be kept in a bag. Work area to be Administrative Control:
Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent
Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
barricaded with signage Close supervision by site Safety Supervisor
Administrative Control: supervisor
Ensure work area is free of construction dust or PPE: Nil
dirt
Use only properly inspected drilling tools and
protective goggles
No loose materials to be kept after work activity
Proper training of equipment to be conducted by
qualified person
Conduct toolbox meeting and LMRA briefing to
workforce

PPE: Worker assigned for the task to wear safety


glass, dust mask and face shield helmet, googles,
safety shoes reflective vest hand glove
11 Pipe Pressurized Can cause Elimination: Nil 4 2 8 Elimination: Nil 4 1 4 Site Supervisor YES
hydrostatic system serious bodily Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
test burst / leak injuries or Foreman
Engineering Control: Cordon off working area Engineering Control: Nil
unconsciousn
Administrative Control: All workers to be briefed Administrative Control:
ess Safety Supervisor
and trained on the proper operation of the small Close supervision by work
pressure pumps equipment. at height supervisor.
Release water pressure immediately upon Daily checks of supervisor
inspection done in charge before work
Danger! Pressure Testing in Progress" must be commence
provided on the testing area. PPE: Nil
Ensure all the pipe joints are properly installed
before input and checked by supervisor in charge
Conduct toolbox meeting and LMRA briefing to
workforce
Adhere to safe work procedures.
PPE: helmet, googles, safety shoes harness
reflective vest hand glove

Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent


Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
12 Cutting / Saw blades. Serious Cut to Elimination: Nil 4 2 8 Elimination: Nil 4 1 4 Site Supervisor YES
grooving of hands or Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
sprinkler other parts of Foreman
Engineering Control: The pipes must be secured Engineering Control: Nil
pipes to body
to the clamp Administrative Control:
sizes using Safety Supervisor
grooving Administrative Control: Close supervision by work
machine / All electrical tools shall be LEW certified. at height supervisor.
fiber cutter Training on safe use of grooving machine / cutting Daily checks of supervisor
machine machine to be conducted monthly by supervisor in in charge before work
charge / competent experienced person commence
Ensure equipment is checked daily for any
damage PPE: Nil
Conduct toolbox meeting and LMRA briefing to
workforce
No loose materials to be kept after work activity

PPE: helmet, googles, safety shoes reflective vest


hand glove to be used accordingly
Exposed to Noise Induced Elimination: Nil 3 2 6 Elimination: Nil 3 1 3 Site Supervisor YES
Loud Noise. Deafness/ Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
Engineering Control: Nil Foreman
Engineering Control: Use only properly inspected
drilling tools and protective ear plug when doing Administrative Control:
noisy works Close supervision Safety Supervisor
Administrative Control: PPE:
Proper training of equipment to be conducted by
qualified person Double hearing protection
if noise level is above
PPE: 85db.
Ear plugs to be used when cutting pipes. NID
awareness in the tool box talk.
helmet, googles, reflective vest hand glove safety
shoes

Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent


Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
Electric Serious burns Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Site Supervisor YES
shocks / fatal Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
Engineering Control: Nil Foreman
Engineering Control:
Electrical cables shall be hung high. Administrative Control:
Close supervision by Safety Supervisor
Check for damages to tools before start work.
Administrative Control: supervisor.
Daily checks of supervisor WAH Supervisor
All electrical tools shall be LEW certified.
Proper training of equipment to be conducted by in charge before work
qualified person commence
Conduct toolbox meeting and LMRA briefing to PPE: Nil
workforce
PPE: helmet, googles, safety shoes harness
reflective vest hand glove

Foreign Respiratory Elimination: Nil 3 2 6 Elimination: Nil 3 1 3 Site Supervisor YES


particles problem/ eye Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
arising. irritation Engineering Control: Nil Foreman
Engineering Control:
Loose tools to be kept in a bag. Work area to be Administrative Control:
Close supervision by site Safety Supervisor
barricaded with signage
Administrative Control: supervisor
Ensure work area is free of construction dust or PPE: Nil
dirt
Use only properly inspected drilling tools and
protective goggles
No loose materials to be kept after work activity
Proper training of equipment to be conducted by
qualified person
Conduct toolbox meeting and LMRA briefing to
workforce
PPE:
Worker assigned for the task to wear safety glass,
dusk mask and face shield.
helmet, googles, safety shoes harness reflective
vest hand glove
Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent
Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
13 Installation Working at Serious bodily Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Site Supervisor YES
of pipes at height / Fall injury / fatal Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
riser from height Engineering Control: Nil Foreman
Engineering Control: Loose tools to be kept in a
compartment Administrative Control:
bag. Work area to be barricaded with signage
or retaining Safety Supervisor
Administrative Control: Close supervision by work
wall
Do not step on mid or guard rail for work purpose. at height supervisor.
Daily checks of supervisor WAH Supervisor
Ensure wall of risers are installed before work
commence in charge before work
Conduct training on safe use of working platform commence
Workers should be briefed not to Modify any PPE: Nil
working platform
Ensure competent WAH Personnel to operate,
control and work on platform
Supervisors and workers to be briefed on daily
visual check of working platform in good condition
Permit-to-work (PTW) for worked at height to be
applied by WAH supervisor, submitted and
approved before commencement of work.
Safe work procedure (SWP) and fall prevention
plan (FPP) to be briefed before commencement of
work.
Conduct toolbox meeting and LMRA briefing to
workforce
Adhere to safe work procedures.
PPE:
Must wear safety harness with double lanyards
and be properly hooked to a rigid point at all times.
helmet, googles, safety shoes harness reflective
vest hand glove
Falling Serious Bodily Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Site Supervisor YES
materials Injuries Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
Engineering Control: Engineering Control: Nil Foreman
Loose tools to be kept in a bag. Work area to be Administrative Control:
barricaded with signage Close supervision by work Safety Supervisor
Administrative Control: Permit-to-work (PTW) for at height supervisor.
Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent
Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
worked at height to be applied by WAH Daily checks of supervisor WAH Supervisor
supervisor, submitted and approved before in charge before work
commencement of work. commence
Safe work procedure (SWP) and fall prevention
plan (FPP) to be briefed before commencement of Adhere to safe work
work. procedures.
Ensure competent WAH Personnel to operate, PPE: Nil
control and work on platform
Appointed watchmen to keep a lookout for
unauthorized entry.
Supervisors and workers to be briefed on daily
visual check of working platform in good condition
Conduct toolbox meeting and LMRA briefing to
workforce
PPE:
All hand tools to be secured to lanyard.
helmet, googles, safety shoes harness reflective
vest hand glove
Trip/slip and Head injury/ Elimination: Nil 3 3 9 Elimination: Nil 3 2 6 Site Supervisor YES
falling fracture/ hand Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
injury/ cuts n Engineering Control: Nil Foreman
Engineering Control:
bruises
Placing of materials and tools inside a barricaded Administrative Control:
Supervisor to educate Safety Supervisor
area. Good access to be maintained at all times to
access to the materials and tools. worker on sufficient tools
and materials to be
Periodic housekeeping of work area.
brought to work area.
Bring minimum tools and materials for the next
Voice out awareness of
few hours of task. Maintain a clear access way at
all times of work. good housekeeping in
TBM.
Administrative Control:
Proper orientation of supervisor of house keeping PPE: Nil
area to be conducted before work start to identify
potential hazards
PPE: Safety helmet, safety shoes, reflective vest
safety goggles and ear plug

Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent


Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
14 Installation Soil erosion Injury/ Death Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Elimination: Nil 4 1 4 Site Supervisor YES
of to person(s) Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
underground Engineering Control: Nil Foreman
Engineering Control: Excavation that exceeds 1.5
pipe services Administrative Control:
m deep shall be provided with proper shoring and
bracing to prevent the sides of the pit / trench from Close supervision Safety Supervisor
collapsing. Provide proper barricade supervisor.
And proper egress and access to excavated pit
PPE: Nil
Administrative Control:
Excavation that exceeds 4.0 m deep shall be
provided with proper shoring and bracing
designed by PE to prevent the sides of the pit /
trench from collapsing.
Materials to be placed at least 610mm from edge
of excavation
Conduct toolbox meeting and LMRA briefing to
workforce
Permit-to-work (PTW) for excavation to bea
applied
PPE: Safety helmet, safety shoes, reflective vest
safety goggles and ear plug

15 Soil Person(s) Injury / Death Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Site Supervisor YES
excavation hit by to person(s) Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
works using excavator and / or Engineering Control: Nil Foreman
Engineering Control: Provision of danger warning
excavator damage to
sign at rear of excavator, side mirrors installed on Administrative Control:
property/ site
excavator, and conduct daily check on excavator Close supervision by Safety Supervisor
facility
machinery supervisor.
Provide proper barricade on work location PPE: Nil
Provide proper egress and access to excavated
pit
Administrative Control:
Only Registered Excavator Operator (REO /
PREO) shall be allowed to use the machine
Conduct toolbox meeting and LMRA briefing to
Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent
Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
workforce
PPE: Safety helmet, safety shoes, reflective vest
safety goggles and ear plug

Toppling of Injury / Death Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Site Supervisor YES
Machinery to person(s) Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
and / or Engineering Control: Nil Foreman
Engineering Control: Excavation that exceeds 1.5
damage to m deep shall be provided with proper shoring and Administrative Control:
property/ site bracing to prevent the sides of the pit / trench from Close supervision by Safety Supervisor
facility
collapsing. supervisor.
Administrative Control: PPE: Nil
Excavation that exceeds 4.0 m deep shall be
provided with proper shoring and bracing
designed by PE to prevent the sides of the pit /
trench from collapsing.
Only Registered Excavator Operator (REO /
PREO) shall be allowed to use the machine
To even ground during operation of excavator to
prevent toppling
Competent operator to ensure excavator is
working within safe work load
Conduct toolbox meeting and LMRA briefing to
workforce
Daily equipment checks by supervisor before work
commence
Permit-to-work (PTW) for excavation to be applied
PPE: Safety helmet, safety shoes, reflective vest
safety goggles and ear plug
16 Working in Heat stress Ill health / Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Site Supervisor YES
hot condition / stroke fatal Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
or under the Engineering Control: Nil Engineering Control: Nil Foreman
sun Administrative Control:
Administrative Control:
Close supervision Safety Supervisor
Supervisor to educate worker on sufficient drinking
Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent
Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
of water during breaks and as necessary supervisor.
Take frequent breaks in between if work duration PPE: Nil WAH Supervisor
is long and under hot weather
Voice out awareness of signs of dehydration such
as light headedness, extreme thirst, brown urine
and headaches
Monitor new workers closely during work under
hot environment
Job rotation of workers
Conduct toolbox meeting and LMRA briefing to
workforce
PPE: Safety helmet, safety shoes, reflective vest
safety goggles and ear plug

17 Workers Mental Ill health / Elimination: Nil 4 1 4 Elimination: Nil 4 1 4 Site Supervisor YES
mental fatigue injury to own Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
health and self Engineering Control: Nil Engineering Control: Nil Foreman
human factor Administrative Control: Administrative Control:
Adequate training of new workers by competent Close supervision Safety Supervisor
supervisor supervisor.
Proper monitoring of work hours does not exceed PPE: Nil Management Team
authority regulations
Adequate rest time and days off
Supervisor to observe workers behavior Conduct
toolbox meeting and LMRA briefing to workforce
PPE: Nil
18 Housekeepin Trip/slip and Head injury/ Elimination: Nil 3 2 6 Elimination: Nil 3 1 3 Site Supervisor YES
g falling fracture/ hand Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
injury/ cuts n Engineering Control: Nil Foreman
Engineering Control:
bruises
Placing of materials and tools inside a barricaded Administrative Control:
Supervisor to educate Safety Supervisor
area. Good access to be maintained at all times to
access to the materials and tools. worker on sufficient tools
Periodic housekeeping of work area. and materials to be
brought to work area.
Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent
Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
Bring minimum tools and materials for the next Voice out awareness of
few hours of task. Maintain a clear access way at good housekeeping in
all times of work. TBM.
Administrative Control: PPE: Nil
Proper orientation of supervisor of house keeping
area to be conducted before work start to identify
potential hazards
PPE: Safety helmet, reflective vest safety shoes,
safety goggles and ear plug
19 Emergency Environmen Bodily injury Elimination: Nil Elimination: Nil Site Supervisor YES
Response t factor / Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
emergency Engineering Control: Nil
situation Engineering Control: Nil Foreman
Administrative Control: Administrative Control:
Supervisor to educate worker on main contractor Close supervision
emergency control scenario and emergency site supervisor and daily Safety Supervisor
location checks
Supervisor to ensure workers are briefed on PPE: Nil
immediate reporting of accidents / injuries to
supervisor in charge and site safety personnel 3 2 6 3 1 3
Active participation on emergency fire drill by all
workers and site personnel
During toolbox meeting ensure workers are given
emergency contact numbers on site
Conduct toolbox meeting and LMRA briefing to
workforce
Refresh emergency procedure to workers every
month
PPE: Safety helmet, reflective vest safety shoes,
safety goggles and ear plug
Sun / hot Heat stroke / Elimination: Nil 3 2 6 Close supervision 3 1 3 PM / WSHS /
weather dehydration Substitution: Nil
exposure SS
Engineering Control: Nil
Administrative Control:
Worker to be brief on signs of heat stroke and
Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent
Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
dehydration
Worker to carry at all times their own water bottle
Supervisor to designate adequate rest time for
workers working under expose weather
PPE: Safety helmet, reflective vest safety shoes,
safety goggles and ear plug
Lightning Electrocution / Elimination: Ensure work stoppage at roof areas 3 2 6 Close supervision 3 1 3 PM / WSHS /
strikes fatality and open field during rain/thunder storms
SS
Substitution: Nil
Engineering Control: Supervisor to ensure location
of works is equipped or installed with temporary
lighting protection
Administrative Control:
Worker to be brief on not working under rain or
thunderstorms
Supervisor to designate adequate rest time for
workers working under expose weather
PPE: Safety helmet, reflective vest safety shoes,
safety goggles and ear plug

20 SG Secure Environmen Bodily injury Elimination: Nil Elimination: Nil Management YES
t factor / Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
emergency Engineering Control: Nil
situation 3 2 6 Engineering Control: Nil 3 1 3 Site Supervisor
Administrative Control: Administrative Control:
Management/Supervisors/Workers(if possible) to Close supervision
download SG secure app for up to date supervisor and daily Foreman
Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent
Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
developments on local emergency checks
announcements
PPE: Nil Safety Supervisor
Supervisor to educate worker on main contractor
emergency control scenario and emergency site
location
Supervisor to ensure workers are briefed on
immediate reporting of accidents / injuries to
supervisor in charge and site safety personnel
Active participation on emergency fire drill by all
workers and site personnel
During toolbox meeting ensure workers are given
emergency contact numbers on site
Conduct toolbox meeting and LMRA briefing to
workforce
Refresh emergency procedure to workers every
month
PPE: Safety helmet, reflective vest safety shoes,
safety goggles and ear plug
21 Hot works / Fire Hazard Bodily injuries Elimination: Nil 4 2 8 Elimination: Nil 4 1 4 PM / WSHS / YES
Welding Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil SS
Engineering Control: Nil Engineering Control: Nil
Administrative Control: Administrative Control:
Hot work Permit must be obtained Close supervision
Always place a fire extinguisher and fire blanket supervisor and daily
near working area checks
Remove combustible material at working area PPE: Nil
Gas cylinder / regulator to have flash back arrestor
device
Only competent welder to carry out hot works
PPE: Use proper PPE (welding mask and leather
glove)

Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent


Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
22 Cutting steel Rotating Cut /Bodily Elimination: Nil 3 3 9 Elimination: Nil 3 2 6 PM / WSHS / SS YES
pipe using drill bits and injuries Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
hydraulic sharp Engineering Control: Nil
cutter edges. Engineering Control: Nil
Administrative Control: Administrative Control:
To ensure tools are equipped with hand guard and Close supervision
in good working condition. supervisor and daily
Supervisors to advise worker on the hand checks
placement before work commence. PPE: Nil
Only competent person to be appointed for
operating the machine.
Unplug all electrical tools when going for breaks.
Remove the battery of the drill when going for
breaks to prevent any unauthorized usage.
PPE: Eye goggles / hand gloves / dust mask
Electric Burns Elimination: Nil 4 2 8 Elimination: Nil 4 1 4 PM / WSHS / SS YES
shocks Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
Engineering Control: Nil Engineering Control: Nil
Administrative Control: Administrative Control:
Ensure of all electrical tools, cables, battery Close supervision
compartment are not in contact with water source. supervisor and daily
All electrical tools shall be LEW certified. checks
No modification of tools. PPE: Nil
Electrical cables shall be hung high.
Check for damages to tools before start work.
Unplug all electrical tools when going for breaks.
Remove the battery of the drill when going for
breaks to prevent any unauthorized usage.
PPE: Eye goggles / hand gloves / dust mask

Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent


Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
Foreign Respiratory Elimination: Nil 3 2 6 Elimination: Nil 3 1 3 PM / WSHS / SS YES
particles problem/ eye Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
arising. irritation Engineering Control: Nil Engineering Control: Nil
Administrative Control: Administrative Control:
Worker assigned for the task to wear safety glass, Close supervision
dust mask and face shield when necessary supervisor and daily
PPE: Eye goggles / hand gloves / dust mask checks
PPE: Nil

23 Installation Falling Serious Bodily Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Site Supervisor YES
Work using materials Injuries Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
Mobile Engineering Control: Engineering Control: Nil Foreman
scaffold Administrative Control:
Loose tools to be kept in a bag. Work area to be
barricaded with signage Close supervision by work Safety Supervisor
Administrative Control: at height supervisor.
Only competent person to erect/certify scaffold Daily checks of supervisor WAH Supervisor
Check validity of scaffold tag before using the in charge before work
scaffold. commence
Do not push/shift mobile scaffold when someone Adhere to safe work
is on it. procedures.
Do not step on mid or guard rail for work purpose. PPE: Nil
Castor wheels of mobile scaffold must be locked
in a stationary position when in use.
Permit-to-work (PTW) for worked at height to be
applied by WAH supervisor, submitted and
approved before commencement of work.
Ensure competent WAH Personnel to operate,
control and work on platform
Appointed watchmen to keep a lookout for
unauthorized entry.
Safe work procedure (SWP) and fall prevention
plan (FPP) to be briefed before commencement of
work.
Supervisors and workers to be briefed on daily
Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent
Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
visual check of working platform in good condition
Conduct toolbox meeting and LMRA briefing to
workforce
PPE: All hand tools to be secured to lanyard.
helmet, googles, harness reflective vest hand
glove
Working at Serious bodily Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Site Supervisor YES
height / Fall injury / fatal Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
from height Engineering Control: Nil Foreman
Engineering Control: Loose tools to be kept in a
bag. Work area to be barricaded with signage Administrative Control:
Administrative Control: Close supervision by work Safety Supervisor
Only competent person to erect/certify scaffold at height supervisor.
Check validity of scaffold tag before using the Daily checks of supervisor WAH Supervisor
scaffold. in charge before work
Conduct training on safe use of working platform commence
Do not push/shift mobile scaffold when someone PPE: Nil
is on it.
Do not step on mid or guard rail for work purpose.
Supervisors and workers to be briefed on daily
visual check of working platform in good condition
Permit-to-work (PTW) for worked at height to be
applied by WAH supervisor, submitted and
approved before commencement of work.
Safe work procedure (SWP) and fall prevention
plan (FPP) to be briefed before commencement of
work.
Ensure competent WAH Personnel to operate,
control and work on platform
Conduct toolbox meeting and LMRA briefing to
workforce
Adhere to safe work procedures.
PPE:
Must wear safety harness with double lanyards
and be properly hooked to a rigid point at all times.

Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent


Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
helmet, googles safety shoes reflective vest hand
glove

24 Hoisting Toppling of Serious Injury Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Site Supervisor YES
tower crane / Death to Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
of
during lifting person(s) Engineering Control: Barricade the area of Engineering Control: Nil Foreman
Machineri due to unloading / loading Administrative Control: Lifting supervisor
es / overload or
improper Ensure that tower crane is constructed duly Close supervision by site
Materials / certified and inspected by competent person or PE supervisor
hoisting
Equipmen Administrative Control: PPE: Nil
t to To ensure all material/equipment loading to be
Materials within safe working load as per LM certification
Receiving Do a pre-hoist check to ensure that the allowable
Platform SWL at the specified radius to be hoisted is more
(MRP) than the weight of load
All personnel to stay clear from suspended load
and radius of swing
Lifting Plan briefing to group of workers
Qualified lifting personnel (lifting supervisor, rigger
& signalman) appointed
Crane Operator to ensure no overloaded
PTW for Lifting to be approved prior to start work
Follow Safe Work Procedures (SE-SWP-01)
Lifting plan in place
PPE:
helmet, googles, safety shoes harness reflective
vest hand glove to be used accordingly
Failure of Serious bodily Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Site Supervisor YES
MRP due to injury / fatality Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
Overloading / damage to Engineering Control: Nil Safety Supervisor
Engineering Control: Nil
property
Administrative Control: Administrative Control:
Close supervision by work WAH Supervisor
Ensure material weight do not exceed MRP Safe
Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent
Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
Working Load at height supervisor.
Ensure PE design and COS in order before Daily checks of supervisor
working on MRP in charge before work
Material storage along MRP area is not allowed commence
Conduct training on safe use of material receiving Refresher training of Safe
platform use of material receiving
Supervisors and workers to be briefed on visual platform
check of material receiving platform in good PPE: Nil
condition
Ensure compliance with material loading platform
Safe Workload
Conduct toolbox meeting and LMRA briefing to
workforce
Adhere to safe work procedures.
PPE:
Must always wear safety harness with double
lanyards and be properly hooked to a rigid point .
helmet, googles safety shoes reflective vest hand
glove
Failure of Serious Injury Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Site Supervisor YES
lifting / Death to Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
equipment person(s) Engineering Control: Barricade the area of Engineering Control: Nil Foreman
and Lifting supervisor
unloading Administrative Control:
machineries
due to Lack Ensure that tower crane is constructed duly Close supervision by site
of certified and inspected by competent person or PE supervisor.
maintenanc Administrative Control: PPE: Nil
e or Do a pre-hoist check to ensure that the allowable
improper SWL at the specified radius to be hoisted is more
handling than the weight of load
Ensure all lifting equipment in good working
condition and inspected by competent person
To ensure all material/equipment loading to be
within safe working load as per LG certification
All personnel to stay clear from suspended load
and radius of swing
Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent
Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
Lifting Plan briefing to group of workers
Qualified lifting personnel (lifting supervisor, rigger
& signalman) appointed
Crane Operator to ensure no overloaded
PTW Lifting to be approved prior to start work
Follow Safe Work Procedures (SE-SWP-01)
Lifting plan in place
PPE:
helmet, googles, safety shoes harness reflective
vest hand glove to be used accordingly
Fall from Serious bodily Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Site Supervisor YES
height due injury / fatality Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
to unsafe / damage to Engineering Control: Nil Safety Supervisor
Engineering Control:
act and property
Provide barricade at platform edge Administrative Control:
platform
giveway Close supervision by work WAH Supervisor
Administrative Control:
Only competent person to supervise WAH works at height supervisor.
Daily checks of supervisor Lifting Supervisor /
Conduct training on safe use of material receiving
in charge before work Rigger / Signal
platform
commence Man / Banksman
Supervisors and workers to be briefed on visual
check of material receiving platform in good Refresher training of Safe
condition use of material receiving
Permit-to-work (PTW) for worked at height to be platform
applied by competent WAH personnel submitted PPE: Nil
and approved before commencement of work.
Safe work procedure (SWP) and fall prevention
plan (FPP) to be briefed before commencement of
work.
Ensure compliance with material loading platform
Safe Workload
Conduct toolbox meeting and LMRA briefing to
workforce
Adhere to safe work procedures.
PPE:
Must always wear safety harness with double
Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent
Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
lanyards and be properly hooked to a rigid point .
helmet, googles safety shoes reflective vest hand
glove

MRP Serious bodily Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Site Supervisor YES
injury / fatality Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
failure
/ damage to Engineering Control: Nil Safety Supervisor
due to Engineering Control: Nil
property Administrative Control:
COS and Administrative Control:
Ensure PE design and COS in order before Close supervision by work WAH Supervisor
PE
working on MRP at height supervisor.
Only competent person to supervise WAH works Daily checks of supervisor
Conduct training on safe use of material receiving in charge before work
platform commence
Supervisors and workers to be briefed on visual Refresher training of Safe
check of material receiving platform in good use of material receiving
condition platform
Permit-to-work (PTW) for worked at height to be
PPE: Nil
applied by competent WAH personnel, submitted
and approved before commencement of work.
Safe work procedure (SWP) and fall prevention
plan (FPP) to be briefed before commencement of
work.
Ensure compliance with material loading platform
Safe Workload
Conduct toolbox meeting and LMRA briefing to
workforce
Adhere to safe work procedures.
PPE:
Must always wear safety harness with double
lanyards and be properly hooked to a rigid point .
helmet, googles safety shoes reflective vest hand
glove

Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent


Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
Falling Serious bodily Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Site Supervisor YES
materials injury / fatality Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
/ damage to Engineering Control: Nil Safety Supervisor
Engineering Control:
property
Provide barricade at platform edge Administrative Control:
Close supervision by work WAH Supervisor
Loose tools to be kept in a bag.
at height supervisor.
Administrative Control:
Daily checks of supervisor Lifting Supervisor /
Only competent person to supervise WAH works
in charge before work Rigger / Signal
Conduct training on safe use of material receiving Man / Banksman
commence
platform
Refresher training of Safe
Supervisors and workers to be briefed on visual
use of material receiving
check of material receiving platform in good
condition platform
Permit-to-work (PTW) for worked at height to be PPE: Nil
applied by competent WAH personnel, submitted
and approved before commencement of work.
Safe work procedure (SWP) and fall prevention
plan (FPP) to be briefed before commencement of
work.
Ensure compliance with material loading platform
Safe Workload
Conduct toolbox meeting and LMRA briefing to
workforce
Adhere to safe work procedures.
PPE:
Must always wear safety harness with double
lanyards and be properly hooked to a rigid point .
helmet, googles safety shoes reflective vest hand
glove
25 Material Improper Back injury / Elimination: Nil 3 2 6 Elimination: Nil 3 1 3 Site Supervisor YES
lifting Muscle strain/ Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
Handling
posture cramp / Engineering Control: Use of trolley in transporting Engineering Control: Nil Foreman
from worker heavy items Administrative Control:
unloading involved Lifting Supervisor /
Administrative Control: Close supervision by site
platform Rigger / Signal
Brief workers on proper lifting technique during supervisor.
to storage
Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent
Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
areas by toolbox meeting. Proper planning of Man / Banksman
manual Deploy adequate manpower. delivery timing to site
handling / Seek buddy if the load is above 25kgs. PPE: Nil
trolley / Quarterly training on correct manual lifting method
pallet jack to workers
PPE: helmet, googles, harness,hand glove to be
used accordingly
Falling Serious bodily Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Site Supervisor YES
materials injury / fatality Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
/ damage to Engineering Control: Nil Safety Supervisor
Engineering Control:
property Administrative Control:
Provide barricade at platform edge
Close supervision by work WAH Supervisor
Loose tools to be kept in a bag.
at height supervisor.
Administrative Control:
Daily checks of supervisor Lifting Supervisor /
Only competent person to supervise WAH works
in charge before work Rigger / Signal
Conduct training on safe use of material receiving Man / Banksman
commence
platform
Refresher training of Safe
Supervisors and workers to be briefed on visual
use of material receiving
check of material receiving platform in good
condition platform
Permit-to-work (PTW) for worked at height to be PPE: Nil
applied by WAH supervisor, submitted and
approved before commencement of work.
Safe work procedure (SWP) and fall prevention
plan (FPP) to be briefed before commencement of
work.
Ensure compliance with material loading platform
Safe Workload
Conduct toolbox meeting and LMRA briefing to
workforce
Adhere to safe work procedures.
PPE:
Must always wear safety harness with double
lanyards and be properly hooked to a rigid point .
helmet, googles safety shoes reflective vest hand
Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent
Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
glove

26 Hoisting Un- Falling Elimination: Nil 4 2 8 Administrative Controls 4 1 4 Immediate Yes


object Substitution: Nil 1. Regular refresher Supervisor
of trained
hitting Engineering Controls RA/SWP briefing to be
materials rigger / conducted and recorded
personnel Cordon off lifting zone with barricade Lifting Supervisor
(Using signalma to remind on the hazards
mobile n working Administrative Controls: and precaution to
near 1. Valid PTW for Lifting Operation workers. Rigger/Signalman
crane)
vicinity. 2. Adhere to Lifting Plan
3. Competent Lifting Team Variables affecting EHS Personnel
Bodily
4. Briefing of RA, SWP, and Lifting Plan to all effectiveness
injuries. workers to enhance awareness on the known Language barrier and
hazard and control measures experience of the worker
5. Regular toolbox meeting to be conducted and may affect their
recorded to emphasize on the hazards and understanding
precaution, including the on-site hazards and
safety precautions to be taken 2. Daily routine Site
6. No incompatible works Inspection to ensure that
7. No pick-and-carry, no dragging or pulling of all activities comply with
load all requirements.
PPE: Comply to KSTS JV PPE requirements
Overload of Falling load Elimination 5 3 15 Administrative Controls 5 2 10 Immediate Yes
crane crash into Not Feasible 1. Regular refresher Supervisor
hazards. public or Substitution RA/SWP briefing to be
people. Not Feasible conducted and recorded Lifting Supervisor
Death or Engineering Controls to remind on the hazards
bodily injuries. 1.Ensure that limit switch is in working condition and precaution to Rigger/Signalman
Engineering Controls workers.
1.Ensure that limit switch is in working condition EHS Personnel
Administrative Controls: Variables affecting
1. Crane Operator should not hoist when effectiveness
overloading devices are faulty. Language barrier and
Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent
Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
2. Crane Operator should stop hoisting if the load experience of the worker
is too heavy & inform lifting supervisor. may affect their
3. Crane Operator should report defect on the understanding
overloading devices on the crane immediately &
stop hoisting. 2. Daily routine Site
4. Valid PTW for Lifting Operations Inspection to ensure that
5. Competent Lifting Team all activities comply with
6. Adhere to Lifting Plan all requirements.
7. Briefing of RA, SWP, and Lifting Plan to all
workers to enhance awareness on the known
hazard and control measures.
8. Regular toolbox meeting to be conducted and
recorded to emphasize on the hazards and
precaution, including the on-site hazards and
safety precautions to be taken.
9. No incompatible works
10. No pick-and-carry, no dragging or pulling of
load
PPE: Comply to KTSJV PPE requirement
Failure of Falling object Elimination 5 3 15 Administrative Controls 5 2 10 Immediate Yes
lifting gears hitting public Not Feasible 1. Regular refresher Supervisor
or people. Substitution RA/SWP briefing to be
Death or Not Feasible conducted and recorded Lifting Supervisor
bodily injuries Engineering Controls to remind on the hazards
1. Lifting zone to be cordoned off before and precaution to Rigger/Signalman
commencement of work workers.
Administrative Controls: EHS Personnel
1. Ensure only lifting gears with valid certificates Variables affecting
are being used on site effectiveness
2. Daily pre-check by lifting team Language barrier and
3. Ensure the lifting gear is use according to the experience of the worker
safe working load. may affect their
4. Valid PTW for Lifting Operations understanding
5. Competent Lifting Team
6. Adhere to Lifting Plan 2. Daily routine Site
7. Briefing of RA, SWP, and Lifting Plan to all Inspection to ensure that
workers to enhance awareness on the known all activities comply with
hazard and control measures. all requirements.
8. Regular toolbox meeting to be conducted and
Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent
Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
recorded to emphasize on the hazards and
precaution, including the on-site hazards and
safety precautions to be taken.
9. No incompatible works
10. Proactive maintenance regime
11. No pick-and-carry, no dragging or pulling of
load
PPE: Comply to KTSJV PPE requirement
Load hitting Swaying load Elimination 5 3 15 Administrative Controls 5 2 10 Immediate Yes
people hitting people. Not Feasible 1. Regular refresher Supervisor
Bodily Substitution RA/SWP briefing to be
injuries. Not Feasible conducted and recorded Lifting Supervisor
Engineering Controls to remind on the hazards
1. Tagline to be used to control swing of load and precaution to Rigger/Signalman
Administrative Controls: workers.
1. Rigger / signalman should warned workers who EHS Personnel
are working below the hoisting area to keep away Variables affecting
by whistling. effectiveness
2. Warning signs to be put up if possible. Language barrier and
3. Valid PTW for Lifting Operations experience of the worker
4. Competent Lifting Team may affect their
5. Adhere to Lifting Plan understanding
6. Briefing of RA, SWP, and Lifting Plan to all
workers to enhance awareness on the known 2. Daily routine Site
hazard and control measures. Inspection to ensure that
7. Regular toolbox meeting to be conducted and all activities comply with
recorded to emphasize on the hazards and all requirements.
precaution, including the on-site hazards and
safety precautions to be taken.
8. No incompatible works
9. No pick-and-carry, no dragging or pulling of
load
PPE: Comply to KTSJV PPE requirement
Loose Loose Elimination 3 2 6 Administrative Controls 3 1 3 Immediate Yes
material materials Not Feasible 1. Regular refresher Supervisor
dropping off hitting public Substitution RA/SWP briefing to be
or people. Not Feasible conducted and recorded Lifting Supervisor
Bodily Engineering Controls to remind on the hazards
injuries. 1. Block off public access and divert human traffic and precaution to Rigger/Signalman
Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent
Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
away from swing radius. workers.
Administrative Controls EHS Personnel
1. Valid PTW for Lifting Operations Variables affecting
2. Competent Lifting Team effectiveness
3. Adhere to Lifting Plan Language barrier and
4. Briefing of RA, SWP, and Lifting Plan to all experience of the worker
workers to enhance awareness on the known may affect their
hazard and control measures. understanding
5. Regular toolbox meeting to be conducted and
recorded to emphasize on the hazards and 2. Daily routine Site
precaution, including the on-site hazards and Inspection to ensure that
safety precautions to be taken. all activities comply with
6. No incompatible works all requirements.
7. No pick-and-carry, no dragging or pulling of
load
8. Watchman to be deploy during hoisting. Divert
pedestrian to walkway.
PPE: Comply to KTSJV PPE requirement
Fall from Fall from Elimination 5 3 15 Administrative Controls 5 2 10 Immediate Yes
height when height. Not Feasible 1. Regular refresher Supervisor
Un-hooking Bodily injuries Substitution RA/SWP briefing to be
of lifting Not Feasible conducted and recorded Lifting Supervisor
gears Engineering Controls to remind on the hazards
1. To provide proper access and working platform, and precaution to Rigger/Signalman
or platform ladder for un-rigging workers.
Administrative Controls EHS Personnel
1. Valid PTW for Lifting Operations Variables affecting
2. Competent Lifting Team effectiveness
3. Adhere to Lifting Plan Language barrier and
4. Briefing of RA, SWP, and Lifting Plan to all experience of the worker
workers to enhance awareness on the known may affect their
hazard and control measures. understanding
5. Regular toolbox meeting to be conducted and
recorded to emphasize on the hazards and 2. Daily routine Site
precaution, including the on-site hazards and Inspection to ensure that
safety precautions to be taken. all activities comply with
6. No incompatible works all requirements.
PPE: Comply to KTSJV PPE requirement

Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent


Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
Poor Topple of Elimination 5 2 10 Administrative Controls 5 1 5 Immediate Yes
ground crane. Not Feasible 1. Regular refresher Supervisor
condition Death or Substitution RA/SWP briefing to be
bodily injuries Not Feasible conducted and recorded Lifting Supervisor
Engineering Controls to remind on the hazards
Not feasible and precaution to Rigger/Signalman
Administrative Controls: workers.
1. Ensure crane sits on steel plate at all times and EHS Personnel
follow as per PE design requirement. Variables affecting
2. Site engineer to conduct daily crane access effectiveness
check. Language barrier and
3. Valid PTW for Lifting Operations experience of the worker
4. Competent Lifting Team may affect their
5. Adhere to Lifting Plan understanding
6. Briefing of RA, SWP, and Lifting Plan to all
workers to enhance awareness on the known 2. Daily routine Site
hazard and control measures. Inspection to ensure that
6. Regular toolbox meeting to be conducted and all activities comply with
recorded to emphasize on the hazards and all requirements.
precaution, including the on-site hazards and
safety precautions to be taken.
7. No incompatible works
PPE: Comply to KTSJV PPE requirement
Strong wind Swaying load Elimination 4 2 8 Administrative Controls 4 1 4 Immediate Yes
condition hitting Stop lifting when encounter with strong wind. 1. Regular refresher Supervisor
people/damag Substitution RA/SWP briefing to be
e building. Not Feasible conducted and recorded Lifting Supervisor
Bodily injuries Engineering Controls to remind on the hazards
Not feasible and precaution to Rigger/Signalman
Administrative Controls workers.
1. Control the load with sufficient taglines and EHS Personnel
rigger Variables affecting
2. Avoid getting too close to building at least 4m effectiveness
away from building if possible Language barrier and
3. Valid PTW for Lifting Operations experience of the worker
4. Competent Lifting Team may affect their
5. Adhere to Lifting Plan understanding
6. Briefing of RA, SWP, and Lifting Plan to all
workers to enhance awareness on the known 2. Daily routine Site
Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent
Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
hazard and control measures. Inspection to ensure that
7. Regular toolbox meeting to be conducted and all activities comply with
recorded to emphasize on the hazards and all requirements.
precaution, including the on-site hazards and
safety precautions to be taken.
8. No incompatible works
PPE: Comply to KTSJV PPE requirement
Hoisting Falling object Elimination 4 2 8 Administrative Controls 4 1 4 Immediate Yes
over temp hazard Not Feasible 1. Regular refresher Supervisor
structure, Substitution RA/SWP briefing to be
example: Not Feasible conducted and recorded Lifting Supervisor
office or Engineering Controls to remind on the hazards
canteen 1. Lifting zone to be cordoned off before and precaution to Rigger/Signalman
rest area commencement of work workers.
etc Administrative Controls EHS Personnel
1. Crane operator will not swing over temp Variables affecting
structure with person present. effectiveness
2. Valid PTW for Lifting Operations Language barrier and
2. Competent Lifting Team experience of the worker
3. Adhere to Lifting Plan may affect their
4. Briefing of RA, SWP, and Lifting Plan to all understanding
workers to enhance awareness on the known
hazard and control measures. 2. Daily routine Site
5. Regular toolbox meeting to be conducted and Inspection to ensure that
recorded to emphasize on the hazards and all activities comply with
precaution, including the on-site hazards and all requirements.
safety precautions to be taken.
6. No incompatible works
7. No pick-and-carry, no dragging or pulling of
load
PPE: Comply to KTSJV PPE requirement
27 Hoisting Un- Falling Elimination: Nil 4 2 8 Administrative Controls 4 1 4 Immediate
object Substitution: Nil 1. Regular refresher Supervisor
of trained
hitting Engineering Controls RA/SWP briefing to be
materials rigger / conducted and recorded
personnel Cordon off lifting zone with barricade Lifting Supervisor
(Using signalma to remind on the hazards
crawler n working Administrative Controls: and precaution to
near 1. Valid PTW for Lifting Operation workers. Rigger/Signalman
crane)
Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent
Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
vicinity. 2. Adhere to Lifting Plan EHS Personnel
Bodily 3. Competent Lifting Team Variables affecting
4. Briefing of RA, SWP, and Lifting Plan to all effectiveness
injuries.
workers to enhance awareness on the known Language barrier and
hazard and control measures experience of the worker
5. Regular toolbox meeting to be conducted and may affect their
recorded to emphasize on the hazards and understanding
precaution, including the on-site hazards and
safety precautions to be taken 2. Daily routine Site
6. No incompatible works Inspection to ensure that
7. No pick-and-carry, no dragging or pulling of all activities comply with
load all requirements.
PPE: Comply to KSTS JV PPE requirements
Overload of Falling load Elimination 5 3 15 Administrative Controls 5 2 10 Immediate
crane crash into Not Feasible 1. Regular refresher Supervisor
hazards. public or Substitution RA/SWP briefing to be
people. Not Feasible conducted and recorded Lifting Supervisor
Death or Engineering Controls to remind on the hazards
bodily injuries. 1.Ensure that limit switch is in working condition and precaution to Rigger/Signalman
Engineering Controls workers.
1.Ensure that limit switch is in working condition EHS Personnel
Administrative Controls: Variables affecting
1. Crane Operator should not hoist when effectiveness
overloading devices are faulty. Language barrier and
2. Crane Operator should stop hoisting if the load experience of the worker
is too heavy & inform lifting supervisor. may affect their
3. Crane Operator should report defect on the understanding
overloading devices on the crane immediately &
stop hoisting. 2. Daily routine Site
4. Valid PTW for Lifting Operations Inspection to ensure that
5. Competent Lifting Team all activities comply with
6. Adhere to Lifting Plan all requirements.
7. Briefing of RA, SWP, and Lifting Plan to all
workers to enhance awareness on the known
hazard and control measures.
8. Regular toolbox meeting to be conducted and
recorded to emphasize on the hazards and
Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent
Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
precaution, including the on-site hazards and
safety precautions to be taken.
9. No incompatible works
10. No pick-and-carry, no dragging or pulling of
load
PPE: Comply to KTSJV PPE requirement
Failure of Falling object Elimination 5 3 15 Administrative Controls 5 2 10 Immediate
lifting gears hitting public Not Feasible 1. Regular refresher Supervisor
or people. Substitution RA/SWP briefing to be
Death or Not Feasible conducted and recorded Lifting Supervisor
bodily injuries Engineering Controls to remind on the hazards
1. Lifting zone to be cordoned off before and precaution to Rigger/Signalman
commencement of work workers.
Administrative Controls: EHS Personnel
1. Ensure only lifting gears with valid certificates Variables affecting
are being used on site effectiveness
2. Daily pre-check by lifting team Language barrier and
3. Ensure the lifting gear is use according to the experience of the worker
safe working load. may affect their
4. Valid PTW for Lifting Operations understanding
5. Competent Lifting Team
6. Adhere to Lifting Plan 2. Daily routine Site
7. Briefing of RA, SWP, and Lifting Plan to all Inspection to ensure that
workers to enhance awareness on the known all activities comply with
hazard and control measures. all requirements.
8. Regular toolbox meeting to be conducted and
recorded to emphasize on the hazards and
precaution, including the on-site hazards and
safety precautions to be taken.
9. No incompatible works
10. Proactive maintenance regime
11. No pick-and-carry, no dragging or pulling of
load
PPE: Comply to KTSJV PPE requirement

Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent


Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
Load hitting Swaying load Elimination 5 3 15 Administrative Controls 5 2 10 Immediate
people hitting people. Not Feasible 1. Regular refresher Supervisor
Bodily Substitution RA/SWP briefing to be
injuries. Not Feasible conducted and recorded Lifting Supervisor
Engineering Controls to remind on the hazards
1. Tagline to be used to control swing of load and precaution to Rigger/Signalman
Administrative Controls: workers.
1. Rigger / signalman should warned workers who EHS Personnel
are working below the hoisting area to keep away Variables affecting
by whistling. effectiveness
2. Warning signs to be put up if possible. Language barrier and
3. Valid PTW for Lifting Operations experience of the worker
4. Competent Lifting Team may affect their
5. Adhere to Lifting Plan understanding
6. Briefing of RA, SWP, and Lifting Plan to all
workers to enhance awareness on the known 2. Daily routine Site
hazard and control measures. Inspection to ensure that
7. Regular toolbox meeting to be conducted and all activities comply with
recorded to emphasize on the hazards and all requirements.
precaution, including the on-site hazards and
safety precautions to be taken.
8. No incompatible works
9. No pick-and-carry, no dragging or pulling of
load
PPE: Comply to KTSJV PPE requirement
Loose Loose Elimination 3 2 6 Administrative Controls 3 1 3 Immediate
material materials Not Feasible 1. Regular refresher Supervisor
dropping off hitting public Substitution RA/SWP briefing to be
or people. Not Feasible conducted and recorded Lifting Supervisor
Bodily Engineering Controls to remind on the hazards
injuries. 1. Block off public access and divert human traffic and precaution to Rigger/Signalman
away from swing radius. workers.
Administrative Controls EHS Personnel
1. Valid PTW for Lifting Operations Variables affecting
2. Competent Lifting Team effectiveness
3. Adhere to Lifting Plan Language barrier and
4. Briefing of RA, SWP, and Lifting Plan to all experience of the worker
workers to enhance awareness on the known may affect their
hazard and control measures. understanding
Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent
Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
5. Regular toolbox meeting to be conducted and
recorded to emphasize on the hazards and 2. Daily routine Site
precaution, including the on-site hazards and Inspection to ensure that
safety precautions to be taken. all activities comply with
6. No incompatible works all requirements.
7. No pick-and-carry, no dragging or pulling of
load
8. Watchman to be deploy during hoisting. Divert
pedestrian to walkway.
PPE: Comply to KTSJV PPE requirement
Fall from Fall from Elimination 5 3 15 Administrative Controls 5 2 10 Immediate
height when height. Not Feasible 1. Regular refresher Supervisor
Un-hooking Bodily injuries Substitution RA/SWP briefing to be
of lifting Not Feasible conducted and recorded Lifting Supervisor
gears Engineering Controls to remind on the hazards
1. To provide proper access and working platform, and precaution to Rigger/Signalman
or platform ladder for un-rigging workers.
Administrative Controls EHS Personnel
1. Valid PTW for Lifting Operations Variables affecting
2. Competent Lifting Team effectiveness
3. Adhere to Lifting Plan Language barrier and
4. Briefing of RA, SWP, and Lifting Plan to all experience of the worker
workers to enhance awareness on the known may affect their
hazard and control measures. understanding
5. Regular toolbox meeting to be conducted and
recorded to emphasize on the hazards and 2. Daily routine Site
precaution, including the on-site hazards and Inspection to ensure that
safety precautions to be taken. all activities comply with
6. No incompatible works all requirements.
PPE: Comply to KTSJV PPE requirement

Poor Topple of Elimination 5 2 10 Administrative Controls 5 1 5 Immediate


ground crane. Not Feasible 1. Regular refresher Supervisor
condition Death or Substitution RA/SWP briefing to be
bodily injuries Not Feasible conducted and recorded Lifting Supervisor
Engineering Controls to remind on the hazards
Not feasible and precaution to Rigger/Signalman
Administrative Controls: workers.
1. Ensure crane sits on steel plate at all times and
Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent
Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
follow as per PE design requirement. Variables affecting EHS Personnel
2. Site engineer to conduct daily crane access effectiveness
check. Language barrier and
3. Valid PTW for Lifting Operations experience of the worker
4. Competent Lifting Team may affect their
5. Adhere to Lifting Plan understanding
6. Briefing of RA, SWP, and Lifting Plan to all
workers to enhance awareness on the known 2. Daily routine Site
hazard and control measures. Inspection to ensure that
6. Regular toolbox meeting to be conducted and all activities comply with
recorded to emphasize on the hazards and all requirements.
precaution, including the on-site hazards and
safety precautions to be taken.
7. No incompatible works
PPE: Comply to KTSJV PPE requirement
Strong wind Swaying load Elimination 4 2 8 Administrative Controls 4 1 4 Immediate
condition hitting Stop lifting when encounter with strong wind. 1. Regular refresher Supervisor
people/damag Substitution RA/SWP briefing to be
e building. Not Feasible conducted and recorded Lifting Supervisor
Bodily injuries Engineering Controls to remind on the hazards
Not feasible and precaution to Rigger/Signalman
Administrative Controls workers.
1. Control the load with sufficient taglines and EHS Personnel
rigger Variables affecting
2. Avoid getting too close to building at least 4m effectiveness
away from building if possible Language barrier and
3. Valid PTW for Lifting Operations experience of the worker
4. Competent Lifting Team may affect their
5. Adhere to Lifting Plan understanding
6. Briefing of RA, SWP, and Lifting Plan to all
workers to enhance awareness on the known 2. Daily routine Site
hazard and control measures. Inspection to ensure that
7. Regular toolbox meeting to be conducted and all activities comply with
recorded to emphasize on the hazards and all requirements.
precaution, including the on-site hazards and
safety precautions to be taken.
8. No incompatible works
PPE: Comply to KTSJV PPE requirement

Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent


Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
Hoisting Falling object Elimination 4 2 8 Administrative Controls 4 1 4 Immediate
over temp hazard Not Feasible 1. Regular refresher Supervisor
structure, Substitution RA/SWP briefing to be
example: Not Feasible conducted and recorded Lifting Supervisor
office or Engineering Controls to remind on the hazards
canteen 1. Lifting zone to be cordoned off before and precaution to Rigger/Signalman
rest area commencement of work workers.
etc Administrative Controls EHS Personnel
1. Crane operator will not swing over temp Variables affecting
structure with person present. effectiveness
2. Valid PTW for Lifting Operations Language barrier and
2. Competent Lifting Team experience of the worker
3. Adhere to Lifting Plan may affect their
4. Briefing of RA, SWP, and Lifting Plan to all understanding
workers to enhance awareness on the known
hazard and control measures. 2. Daily routine Site
5. Regular toolbox meeting to be conducted and Inspection to ensure that
recorded to emphasize on the hazards and all activities comply with
precaution, including the on-site hazards and all requirements.
safety precautions to be taken.
6. No incompatible works
7. No pick-and-carry, no dragging or pulling of
load
PPE: Comply to KTSJV PPE requirement
28 Hoisting of Un-trained Falling object Elimination: Nil 4 2 8 Administrative Controls 4 1 4 Immediate Yes
materials rigger / hitting Substitution: Nil 1. Regular refresher Supervisor
(Using tower signalman personnel Engineering Controls RA/SWP briefing to be
crane) working near Cordon off lifting zone with barricade conducted and recorded Lifting Supervisor
vicinity. Administrative Controls: to remind on the hazards
Bodily 1. Valid PTW for Lifting Operation and precaution to Rigger/Signalman
injuries. 2. Adhere to Lifting Plan workers.
3. Competent Lifting Team EHS Personnel
4. Briefing of RA, SWP, and Lifting Plan to all Variables affecting
workers to enhance awareness on the known effectiveness
hazard and control measures Language barrier and
5. Regular toolbox meeting to be conducted and experience of the worker
recorded to emphasize on the hazards and may affect their
precaution, including the on-site hazards and understanding
safety precautions to be taken
Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent
Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
6. No incompatible works 2. Daily routine Site
7. No pick-and-carry, no dragging or pulling of Inspection to ensure that
load all activities comply with
PPE: Comply to KSTS JV PPE requirements all requirements.

Overloading Falling load Elimination 5 3 15 Administrative Controls 5 2 10 Immediate Yes


crash into Not Feasible 1. Regular refresher Supervisor
public or Substitution RA/SWP briefing to be
people. Not Feasible conducted and recorded Lifting Supervisor
Death or Engineering Controls to remind on the hazards
bodily injuries. 1.Ensure that limit switch is in working condition and precaution to Rigger/Signalman
Engineering Controls workers.
1.Ensure that limit switch is in working condition EHS Personnel
Administrative Controls: Variables affecting
1. Crane Operator should not hoist when effectiveness
overloading devices are faulty. Language barrier and
2. Crane Operator should stop hoisting if the load experience of the worker
is too heavy & inform lifting supervisor. may affect their
3. Crane Operator should report defect on the understanding
overloading devices on the crane immediately &
stop hoisting. 2. Daily routine Site
4. Valid PTW for Lifting Operations Inspection to ensure that
5. Competent Lifting Team all activities comply with
6. Adhere to Lifting Plan all requirements.
7. Briefing of RA, SWP, and Lifting Plan to all
workers to enhance awareness on the known
hazard and control measures.
8. Regular toolbox meeting to be conducted and
recorded to emphasize on the hazards and
precaution, including the on-site hazards and
safety precautions to be taken.
9. No incompatible works
10. No pick-and-carry, no dragging or pulling of
load
PPE: Comply to KTSJV PPE requirement

Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent


Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
Failure of Falling object Elimination 5 3 15 Administrative Controls 5 2 10 Immediate Yes
lifting gears hitting public Not Feasible 1. Regular refresher Supervisor
or people. Substitution RA/SWP briefing to be
Death or Not Feasible conducted and recorded Lifting Supervisor
bodily injuries Engineering Controls to remind on the hazards
1. Lifting zone to be cordoned off before and precaution to Rigger/Signalman
commencement of work workers.
Administrative Controls: EHS Personnel
1. Ensure only lifting gears with valid certificates Variables affecting
are being used on site effectiveness
2. Daily pre-check by lifting team Language barrier and
3. Ensure the lifting gear is use according to the experience of the worker
safe working load. may affect their
4. Valid PTW for Lifting Operations understanding
5. Competent Lifting Team
6. Adhere to Lifting Plan 2. Daily routine Site
7. Briefing of RA, SWP, and Lifting Plan to all Inspection to ensure that
workers to enhance awareness on the known all activities comply with
hazard and control measures. all requirements.
8. Regular toolbox meeting to be conducted and
recorded to emphasize on the hazards and
precaution, including the on-site hazards and
safety precautions to be taken.
9. No incompatible works
10. Proactive maintenance regime
11. No pick-and-carry, no dragging or pulling of
load
PPE: Comply to KTSJV PPE requirement
Load hitting Swaying load Elimination 5 3 15 Administrative Controls 5 2 10 Immediate Yes
people hitting people. Not Feasible 1. Regular refresher Supervisor
Bodily Substitution RA/SWP briefing to be
injuries. Not Feasible conducted and recorded Lifting Supervisor
Engineering Controls to remind on the hazards
1. Tagline to be used to control swing of load and precaution to Rigger/Signalman
Administrative Controls: workers.
1. Rigger / signalman should warned workers who EHS Personnel
are working below the hoisting area to keep away Variables affecting
by whistling. effectiveness
2. Warning signs to be put up if possible. Language barrier and
Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent
Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
3. Valid PTW for Lifting Operations experience of the worker
4. Competent Lifting Team may affect their
5. Adhere to Lifting Plan understanding
6. Briefing of RA, SWP, and Lifting Plan to all
workers to enhance awareness on the known 2. Daily routine Site
hazard and control measures. Inspection to ensure that
7. Regular toolbox meeting to be conducted and all activities comply with
recorded to emphasize on the hazards and all requirements.
precaution, including the on-site hazards and
safety precautions to be taken.
8. No incompatible works
9. No pick-and-carry, no dragging or pulling of
load
PPE: Comply to KTSJV PPE requirement
Loose Loose Elimination 3 2 6 Administrative Controls 3 1 3 Immediate Yes
material materials Not Feasible 1. Regular refresher Supervisor
dropping off hitting public Substitution RA/SWP briefing to be
or people. Not Feasible conducted and recorded Lifting Supervisor
Bodily Engineering Controls to remind on the hazards
injuries. 1. Block off public access and divert human traffic and precaution to Rigger/Signalman
away from swing radius. workers.
Administrative Controls EHS Personnel
1. Valid PTW for Lifting Operations Variables affecting
2. Competent Lifting Team effectiveness
3. Adhere to Lifting Plan Language barrier and
4. Briefing of RA, SWP, and Lifting Plan to all experience of the worker
workers to enhance awareness on the known may affect their
hazard and control measures. understanding
5. Regular toolbox meeting to be conducted and
recorded to emphasize on the hazards and 2. Daily routine Site
precaution, including the on-site hazards and Inspection to ensure that
safety precautions to be taken. all activities comply with
6. No incompatible works all requirements.
7. No pick-and-carry, no dragging or pulling of
load
8. Watchman to be deploy during hoisting. Divert
pedestrian to walkway.
PPE: Comply to KTSJV PPE requirement

Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent


Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
Fall from Fall from Elimination 5 3 15 Administrative Controls 5 2 10 Immediate Yes
height height. Not Feasible 1. Regular refresher Supervisor
when Un- Bodily injuries Substitution RA/SWP briefing to be
hooking of Not Feasible conducted and recorded Lifting Supervisor
lifting gears Engineering Controls to remind on the hazards
1. To provide proper access and working platform, and precaution to Rigger/Signalman
or platform ladder for un-rigging workers.
Administrative Controls EHS Personnel
1. Valid PTW for Lifting Operations Variables affecting
2. Competent Lifting Team effectiveness
3. Adhere to Lifting Plan Language barrier and
4. Briefing of RA, SWP, and Lifting Plan to all experience of the worker
workers to enhance awareness on the known may affect their
hazard and control measures. understanding
5. Regular toolbox meeting to be conducted and
recorded to emphasize on the hazards and 2. Daily routine Site
precaution, including the on-site hazards and Inspection to ensure that
safety precautions to be taken. all activities comply with
6. No incompatible works all requirements.
PPE: Comply to KTSJV PPE requirement

Hoisting Falling object Elimination 4 2 8 Administrative Controls 4 1 4 Immediate Yes


over temp hazard Not Feasible 1. Regular refresher Supervisor
structure, Substitution RA/SWP briefing to be
example: Not Feasible conducted and recorded Lifting Supervisor
office or Engineering Controls to remind on the hazards
canteen 1. Lifting zone to be cordoned off before and precaution to Rigger/Signalman
rest area commencement of work workers.
etc Administrative Controls EHS Personnel
1. Crane operator will not swing over temp Variables affecting
structure with person present. effectiveness
2. Valid PTW for Lifting Operations Language barrier and
2. Competent Lifting Team experience of the worker
3. Adhere to Lifting Plan may affect their
4. Briefing of RA, SWP, and Lifting Plan to all understanding
workers to enhance awareness on the known
hazard and control measures. 2. Daily routine Site
5. Regular toolbox meeting to be conducted and Inspection to ensure that
recorded to emphasize on the hazards and all activities comply with
Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent
Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
precaution, including the on-site hazards and all requirements.
safety precautions to be taken.
6. No incompatible works
7. No pick-and-carry, no dragging or pulling of
load
PPE: Comply to KTSJV PPE requirement
29 Hoisting of Un-trained Falling object Elimination: Nil 4 2 8 Administrative Controls 4 1 4 Immediate Yes
materials rigger / hitting Substitution: Nil 1. Regular refresher Supervisor
(Using lorry signalman personnel Engineering Controls RA/SWP briefing to be
crane) working near Cordon off lifting zone with barricade conducted and recorded Lifting Supervisor
vicinity. Administrative Controls: to remind on the hazards
Bodily 1. Valid PTW for Lifting Operation and precaution to Rigger/Signalman
injuries. 2. Adhere to Lifting Plan workers.
3. Competent Lifting Team EHS Personnel
4. Briefing of RA, SWP, and Lifting Plan to all Variables affecting
workers to enhance awareness on the known effectiveness
hazard and control measures Language barrier and
5. Regular toolbox meeting to be conducted and experience of the worker
recorded to emphasize on the hazards and may affect their
precaution, including the on-site hazards and understanding
safety precautions to be taken
6. No incompatible works 2. Daily routine Site
7. No pick-and-carry, no dragging or pulling of Inspection to ensure that
load all activities comply with
PPE: Comply to KSTS JV PPE requirements all requirements.
Failure to Topple of Elimination 4 2 8 Administrative Controls 4 1 4 Immediate Yes
extend out- crane Not feasible 1. Regular refresher Supervisor
rigger Death or Substitution RA/SWP briefing to be
during bodily injuries. Not feasible conducted and recorded Lifting Supervisor
hoisting Engineering Controls to remind on the hazards
Not feasible and precaution to Rigger/Signalman
Administrative Controls: workers.
1. Valid PTW for Lifting Operation EHS Personnel
2. Adhere to Lifting Plan Variables affecting
3. Competent Lifting Team effectiveness
4. Briefing of RA, SWP, and Lifting Plan to all Language barrier and
workers to enhance awareness on the known experience of the worker
hazard and control measures. may affect their
5. Regular toolbox meeting to be conducted and understanding
Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent
Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
recorded to emphasize on the hazards and
precaution, including the on-site hazards and 2. Daily routine Site
safety precautions to be taken. Inspection to ensure that
6. No incompatible works all activities comply with
7. Ensure sufficient clearance for extension of out- all requirements.
rigger
8. Out-rigger to be seated on flat and level ground
or on steel plates
9. No pick-and-carry, no dragging or pulling of
load
PPE: Comply to KSTS JV PPE requirements
Toppling of Falling load Elimination 5 3 15 Administrative Controls 5 2 10 Immediate Yes
crane due crash into Not Feasible 1. Regular refresher Supervisor
to public or Substitution RA/SWP briefing to be
overloading people. Not Feasible conducted and recorded Lifting Supervisor
Death or Engineering Controls to remind on the hazards
bodily injuries. 1. Cordon off lifting zone with barricade and precaution to Rigger/Signalman
Administrative Controls: workers.
1. Crane Operator should not hoist when EHS Personnel
overloading devices are faulty. Variables affecting
2. Crane Operator should stop hoisting if the load effectiveness
is too heavy & inform lifting supervisor. Language barrier and
3. Crane Operator should report defect on the experience of the worker
overloading devices on the crane immediately & may affect their
stop hoisting. understanding
4. Valid PTW for Lifting Operations
5. Competent Lifting Team 2. Daily routine Site
6. Adhere to Lifting Plan Inspection to ensure that
7. Briefing of RA, SWP, and Lifting Plan to all all activities comply with
workers to enhance awareness on the known all requirements.
hazard and control measures.
8. Regular toolbox meeting to be conducted and
recorded to emphasize on the hazards and
precaution, including the on-site hazards and
safety precautions to be taken.
9. No incompatible works
10. Proactive maintenance regime
11. No pick-and-carry, no dragging or pulling of
load
Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent
Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
PPE:Comply to KTSJV PPE requirement

Failure of Falling object Elimination 5 3 15 Administrative Controls 5 2 10 Immediate Yes


lifting gears hitting public Not Feasible 1. Regular refresher Supervisor
or people. Substitution RA/SWP briefing to be
Death or Not Feasible conducted and recorded Lifting Supervisor
bodily injuries Engineering Controls to remind on the hazards
1. Lifting zone to be cordoned off before and precaution to Rigger/Signalman
commencement of work workers.
Administrative Controls: EHS Personnel
1. Ensure only lifting gears with valid certificates Variables affecting
are being used on site effectiveness
2. Daily pre-check by lifting team Language barrier and
3. Ensure the lifting gear is use according to the experience of the worker
safe working load. may affect their
4. Valid PTW for Lifting Operations understanding
5. Competent Lifting Team
6. Adhere to Lifting Plan 2. Daily routine Site
7. Briefing of RA, SWP, and Lifting Plan to all Inspection to ensure that
workers to enhance awareness on the known all activities comply with
hazard and control measures. all requirements.
8. Regular toolbox meeting to be conducted and
recorded to emphasize on the hazards and
precaution, including the on-site hazards and
safety precautions to be taken.
9. No incompatible works
10. Proactive maintenance regime
11. No pick-and-carry, no dragging or pulling of
load
PPE: Comply to KTSJV PPE requirement

Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent


Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
Load hitting Swaying load Elimination 5 3 15 Administrative Controls 5 2 10 Immediate Yes
people hitting people. Not Feasible 1. Regular refresher Supervisor
Bodily Substitution RA/SWP briefing to be
injuries. Not Feasible conducted and recorded Lifting Supervisor
Engineering Controls to remind on the hazards
1. Tagline to be used to control swing of load and precaution to Rigger/Signalman
Administrative Controls: workers.
1. Rigger / signalman should warned workers who EHS Personnel
are working below the hoisting area to keep away Variables affecting
by whistling. effectiveness
2. Warning signs to be put up if possible. Language barrier and
3. Valid PTW for Lifting Operations experience of the worker
4. Competent Lifting Team may affect their
5. Adhere to Lifting Plan understanding
6. Briefing of RA, SWP, and Lifting Plan to all
workers to enhance awareness on the known 2. Daily routine Site
hazard and control measures. Inspection to ensure that
7. Regular toolbox meeting to be conducted and all activities comply with
recorded to emphasize on the hazards and all requirements.
precaution, including the on-site hazards and
safety precautions to be taken.
8. No incompatible works
9. No pick-and-carry, no dragging or pulling of
load
PPE: Comply to KTSJV PPE requirement
Fall from Fall from Elimination 5 3 15 Administrative Controls 5 2 10 Immediate Yes
height when height. Not Feasible 1. Regular refresher Supervisor
Un-hooking Bodily injuries Substitution RA/SWP briefing to be
of lifting Not Feasible conducted and recorded Lifting Supervisor
gears Engineering Controls to remind on the hazards
1. To provide proper access and working platform, and precaution to Rigger/Signalman
or platform ladder for un-rigging workers.
Administrative Controls EHS Personnel
1. Valid PTW for Lifting Operations Variables affecting
2. Competent Lifting Team effectiveness
3. Adhere to Lifting Plan Language barrier and
4. Briefing of RA, SWP, and Lifting Plan to all experience of the worker
workers to enhance awareness on the known may affect their
hazard and control measures. understanding
Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent
Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
5. Regular toolbox meeting to be conducted and
recorded to emphasize on the hazards and 2. Daily routine Site
precaution, including the on-site hazards and Inspection to ensure that
safety precautions to be taken. all activities comply with
6. No incompatible works all requirements.
PPE:
1. Comply to KTSJV PPE requirement
30 Hoisting of Un-trained Falling object Elimination: Nil 4 2 8 Administrative Controls 4 1 4 Immediate Yes
materials rigger / hitting Substitution: Nil 1. Regular refresher Supervisor
(Using mini- signalman personnel Engineering Controls RA/SWP briefing to be
crane) working near Cordon off lifting zone with barricade conducted and recorded Lifting Supervisor
vicinity. Administrative Controls: to remind on the hazards
Bodily 1. Valid PTW for Lifting Operation and precaution to Rigger/Signalman
injuries. 2. Adhere to Lifting Plan workers.
3. Competent Lifting Team EHS Personnel
4. Briefing of RA, SWP, and Lifting Plan to all Variables affecting
workers to enhance awareness on the known effectiveness
hazard and control measures Language barrier and
5. Regular toolbox meeting to be conducted and experience of the worker
recorded to emphasize on the hazards and may affect their
precaution, including the on-site hazards and understanding
safety precautions to be taken
6. No incompatible works 2. Daily routine Site
7. No pick-and-carry, no dragging or pulling of Inspection to ensure that
load all activities comply with
PPE: Comply to KSTS JV PPE requirements all requirements.

Failure to Topple of Elimination 4 2 8 Administrative Controls 4 1 4 Immediate Yes


extend out- crane Not feasible 1. Regular refresher Supervisor
rigger Death or Substitution RA/SWP briefing to be
during bodily injuries. Not feasible conducted and recorded Lifting Supervisor
hoisting Engineering Controls to remind on the hazards
Not feasible and precaution to Rigger/Signalman
Administrative Controls: workers.
1. Valid PTW for Lifting Operation EHS Personnel
2. Adhere to Lifting Plan Variables affecting
3. Competent Lifting Team effectiveness
Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent
Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
4. Briefing of RA, SWP, and Lifting Plan to all Language barrier and
workers to enhance awareness on the known experience of the worker
hazard and control measures. may affect their
5. Regular toolbox meeting to be conducted and understanding
recorded to emphasize on the hazards and
precaution, including the on-site hazards and 2. Daily routine Site
safety precautions to be taken. Inspection to ensure that
6. No incompatible works all activities comply with
7. Ensure sufficient clearance for extension of out- all requirements.
rigger
8. Out-rigger to be seated on flat and level ground
or on steel plates
9. No pick-and-carry, no dragging or pulling of
load
PPE: Comply to KSTS JV PPE requirements
Toppling of Falling load Elimination 5 3 15 Administrative Controls 5 2 10 Immediate Yes
crane due crash into Not Feasible 1. Regular refresher Supervisor
to public or Substitution RA/SWP briefing to be
overloading people. Not Feasible conducted and recorded Lifting Supervisor
Death or Engineering Controls to remind on the hazards
bodily injuries. 1. Cordon off lifting zone with barricade and precaution to Rigger/Signalman
Administrative Controls: workers.
1. Crane Operator should not hoist when EHS Personnel
overloading devices are faulty. Variables affecting
2. Crane Operator should stop hoisting if the load effectiveness
is too heavy & inform lifting supervisor. Language barrier and
3. Crane Operator should report defect on the experience of the worker
overloading devices on the crane immediately & may affect their
stop hoisting. understanding
4. Valid PTW for Lifting Operations
5. Competent Lifting Team 2. Daily routine Site
6. Adhere to Lifting Plan Inspection to ensure that
7. Briefing of RA, SWP, and Lifting Plan to all all activities comply with
workers to enhance awareness on the known all requirements.
hazard and control measures.
8. Regular toolbox meeting to be conducted and
recorded to emphasize on the hazards and
precaution, including the on-site hazards and
safety precautions to be taken.
Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent
Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
9. No incompatible works
10. Proactive maintenance regime
11. No pick-and-carry, no dragging or pulling of
load
PPE:Comply to KTSJV PPE requirement

Failure of Falling object Elimination Ca Oc Hi Administrative Controls Ca Re M Immediate Yes


lifting gears hitting public Not Feasible ta ca gh( 1. Regular refresher tas mo edi Supervisor
or people. Substitution str sio 15) RA/SWP briefing to be tro te u
Death or Not Feasible op nal conducted and recorded phi (2) m Lifting Supervisor
bodily injuries Engineering Controls hic (3) to remind on the hazards c (1
1. Lifting zone to be cordoned off before (5 and precaution to (5) 0) Rigger/Signalman
commencement of work ) workers.
Administrative Controls: EHS Personnel
1. Ensure only lifting gears with valid certificates Variables affecting
are being used on site effectiveness
2. Daily pre-check by lifting team Language barrier and
3. Ensure the lifting gear is use according to the experience of the worker
safe working load. may affect their
4. Valid PTW for Lifting Operations understanding
5. Competent Lifting Team
6. Adhere to Lifting Plan 2. Daily routine Site
7. Briefing of RA, SWP, and Lifting Plan to all Inspection to ensure that
workers to enhance awareness on the known all activities comply with
hazard and control measures. all requirements.
8. Regular toolbox meeting to be conducted and
recorded to emphasize on the hazards and
precaution, including the on-site hazards and
safety precautions to be taken.
9. No incompatible works
10. Proactive maintenance regime
11. No pick-and-carry, no dragging or pulling of
load
PPE: Comply to KTSJV PPE requirement

Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent


Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
Load hitting Swaying load Elimination 5 3 15 Administrative Controls 5 2 10 Immediate Yes
people hitting people. Not Feasible 1. Regular refresher Supervisor
Bodily Substitution RA/SWP briefing to be
injuries. Not Feasible conducted and recorded Lifting Supervisor
Engineering Controls to remind on the hazards
1. Tagline to be used to control swing of load and precaution to Rigger/Signalman
Administrative Controls: workers.
1. Rigger / signalman should warned workers who EHS Personnel
are working below the hoisting area to keep away Variables affecting
by whistling. effectiveness
2. Warning signs to be put up if possible. Language barrier and
3. Valid PTW for Lifting Operations experience of the worker
4. Competent Lifting Team may affect their
5. Adhere to Lifting Plan understanding
6. Briefing of RA, SWP, and Lifting Plan to all
workers to enhance awareness on the known 2. Daily routine Site
hazard and control measures. Inspection to ensure that
7. Regular toolbox meeting to be conducted and all activities comply with
recorded to emphasize on the hazards and all requirements.
precaution, including the on-site hazards and
safety precautions to be taken.
8. No incompatible works
9. No pick-and-carry, no dragging or pulling of
load
PPE: Comply to KTSJV PPE requirement
Fall from Fall from Elimination 5 3 15 Administrative Controls 5 2 10 Immediate Yes
height when height. Not Feasible 1. Regular refresher Supervisor
Un-hooking Bodily injuries Substitution RA/SWP briefing to be
of lifting Not Feasible conducted and recorded Lifting Supervisor
gears Engineering Controls to remind on the hazards
1. To provide proper access and working platform, and precaution to Rigger/Signalman
or platform ladder for un-rigging workers.
Administrative Controls EHS Personnel
1. Valid PTW for Lifting Operations Variables affecting
2. Competent Lifting Team effectiveness
3. Adhere to Lifting Plan Language barrier and
4. Briefing of RA, SWP, and Lifting Plan to all experience of the worker
workers to enhance awareness on the known may affect their
hazard and control measures. understanding
Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent
Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
5. Regular toolbox meeting to be conducted and
recorded to emphasize on the hazards and 2. Daily routine Site
precaution, including the on-site hazards and Inspection to ensure that
safety precautions to be taken. all activities comply with
6. No incompatible works all requirements.
PPE:
1. Comply to KTSJV PPE requirement
30 Environment Blocked Fatality / Elimination 5 2 10 Administrative Controls: 5 1 5 Immediate Yes
al factors vision from Seriously Not Feasible 1. Continuous monitoring Supervisor
crane cabin injuries Substitution and updates on the PSI
due to haze Not Feasible (Pollutants Standard Lifting Supervisor
condition Engineering Controls Index) of the haze.
1. Only competent lifting crew within lifting zone. Rigger/Signalman
2. Crane operator to maintain regular contacts
with lifting crew members when vision is EHS Personnel
blurred through the use of walkie-talkie
3. No one is allowed to stand within lifting zone
area.
Administrative Controls:
1. Slow maneuvering of boom during hoisting
activity.
PPE
Wear respirator mask N95 mask
Worker Significant Elimination 3 2 6 Administrative Controls: 3 1 3 Immediate Yes
irritation aggravation of Not Feasible At PSI > 100, Supervisor
symptoms symptoms Substitution All employees carrying
affecting the and Not Feasible out outdoor work to Lifting Supervisor
Health decreased Engineering Controls undergo respirator fit
tolerance 1. To stay indoor when PSI reached >300. testing1.2 Rigger/Signalman
in persons Administrative Controls: 1.All employees know
with heart 1. Continuous monitoring and updates on the PSI when to stop outdoor EHS Personnel
or respiratory (Pollutants Standard Index) of the haze. work
illness; PPE: -At PSI > 200,
widespread 1. N95 mask issued to all employees who are Susceptible employees
symptoms in exposed to outdoor activity. must use suitable
healthy respirators if working
population outdoor
-At PSI > 300,
->All employees carrying
Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent
Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
out outdoor work should
use suitable respirators
->Susceptible employees
should work indoor,
preferably doing work
which is not physically
strenuous.
-At PSI > 400,
->All employees should
remain indoors and avoid
strenuous work.
->All employees carrying
out emergency and
essential services must
wear suitable respirators
Heat Stress Possible Elimination: Not feasible 5 3 15 Administrative Controls 5 2 10 Immediate
fatality, Substitution: Not feasible 1. Regular refresher Supervisor
serious RA/SWP briefing to be (ongoing)
injuries Engineering control conducted and recorded
1. Adequate space for designated rest area with to remind on the hazards
shelter, benches, localized ventilation and potable and precaution to
water point workers.
Administrative control
1. Job rotation to shorten the period of direct Variables affecting
exposure to sun effectiveness
Language barrier and
2. Minimise the layers of clothing
experience of the worker
3. Maintain hydration with copious amount of may affect their
potable water at frequent interval understanding
4. Schedule labour intensive work to early in the
morning or later part of the afternoon where sun is 2. Daily routine Site
not at the strongest. Inspection to ensure that
5. Heat Stress Management Plan all activities comply with
PPE: Nil all requirements.

Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent


Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
Strike by Multiple Elimination: 5 3 15 Administrative Controls 5 2 10 Immediate
lightning Injuries / 1. Work activities to stop during lightning condition 1. Regular refresher Supervisor
Electrocution / and seek shelter at nearest designated rest area RA/SWP briefing to be
Fatality conducted and recorded
Substitution: Nil to remind on the hazards
Engineering control and precaution to
1. Adequate space for sheltered designated rest workers.
area Variables affecting
Administrative control effectiveness
Language barrier and
1. Clear directional signs to designated rest area
experience of the worker
PPE may affect their
1. Comply to KTSJV PPE requirement understanding
2. Daily routine Site
Inspection to ensure that
all activities comply with
all requirements.

31 Painting of Fire Hazard Bodily injuries Elimination: Nil 4 2 8 Elimination: Nil 4 1 4 PM / WSHS / YES
pipe works Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil SS
Engineering Control: Nil Engineering Control: Nil
Administrative Control: Administrative Control:
Paint cans must be stored at a secure place away Close supervision
from open flame supervisor and daily
Always place a fire extinguisher near working area checks
PPE: Use proper PPE (face mask ) PPE: Nil

Toxic Respiratory Elimination: Nil 3 2 6 Elimination: Nil 3 1 3 Site Supervisor YES


Inhalation problem / eye Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
irritation Engineering Control: Nil Foreman
Engineering Control: Nil
Administrative Control: Administrative Control:
Brief workers of painting health hazards as per Close supervision by site Safety Supervisor
MSDS supervisor
Proper ventilation on work area PPE: Nil
Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent
Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
Paint cans must be stored at a secure place away
PPE:
Worker assigned for the task to wear safety glass,
dust mask
helmet, googles, safety shoes reflective vest hand
glove
32 Installation Falling Serious Bodily Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Site Supervisor YES
Work using materials Injuries Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
Tower Engineering Control: Engineering Control: Nil Foreman
scaffold Administrative Control:
Loose tools to be kept in a bag. Work area to be
barricaded with signage and clear at all times Close supervision by work Safety Supervisor
Administrative Control: at height supervisor.
Only competent person to erect/certify scaffold Daily checks of supervisor WAH Supervisor
Check validity of scaffold tag before using the in charge before work
scaffold. commence
Check and comply with scaffold SWL when Adhere to safe work
installing materials procedures.
Do not step on mid or guard rail for work purpose. PPE: Nil
Permit-to-work (PTW) for worked at height to be
applied by WAH supervisor, submitted and
approved before commencement of work.
Ensure competent WAH Personnel to operate,
control and work on platform
Appointed watchmen to keep a lookout for
unauthorized entry.
Safe work procedure (SWP) and fall prevention
plan (FPP) to be briefed before commencement of
work.
Supervisors and workers to be briefed on daily
visual check of working platform in good condition
Conduct toolbox meeting and LMRA briefing to
workforce
PPE: All workers must wear safety harness with
double lanyards and be properly hooked to a rigid
point at all times.
Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent
Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
All hand tools to be secured to lanyard.
helmet, googles, harness reflective vest hand
glove

Working at Serious bodily Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Site Supervisor YES
height / Fall injury / fatal Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
from height Engineering Control: Nil Foreman
Engineering Control: Loose tools to be kept in a
bag. Work area to be barricaded with signage and Administrative Control:
clear at all times Close supervision by work Safety Supervisor
Administrative Control: at height supervisor.
Only competent person to erect/certify scaffold Daily checks of supervisor WAH Supervisor
Check validity of scaffold tag before using the in charge before work
scaffold. commence
Check and comply with scaffold SWL when PPE: Nil
installing materials
Conduct training on safe use of working platform
Do not step on mid or guard rail for work purpose.
Supervisors and workers to be briefed on daily
visual check of working platform in good condition
Permit-to-work (PTW) for worked at height to be
applied by WAH supervisor, submitted and
approved before commencement of work.
Safe work procedure (SWP) and fall prevention
plan (FPP) to be briefed before commencement of
work.
Ensure competent WAH Personnel to operate,
control and work on platform
Conduct toolbox meeting and LMRA briefing to
workforce
Adhere to safe work procedures.
PPE:
All workers must wear safety harness with double
lanyards and be properly hooked to a rigid point at
all times.
Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent
Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
helmet, googles safety shoes reflective vest hand
glove

Overhead Minor Injury Elimination: Nil 3 2 6 Elimination: Nil 3 1 3 Site Supervisor YES
Hazards Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
Engineering Control: Engineering Control: Nil Foreman
Loose materials to be kept in toolbox or working Administrative Control:
buckets Close supervision by work Safety Supervisor
Administrative Control: at height supervisor. WAH Supervisor
Brief workers of potential hazards on overhead Daily checks of supervisor
services prior to work commence in charge before work
Proper housekeeping of platform commence
before/during/after work commencement Adhere to safe work
Do not stand on material or railing to over reach procedures.
the work location. PPE: Nil
Close supervision by work at height supervisor.
Conduct toolbox meeting and LMRA briefing to
workforce.
Adhere to safe work procedures.
PPE: All workers must wear safety harness with
double lanyards and be properly hooked to a rigid
point at all times helmet, googles, reflective vest,
hand glove
33 Covid-19 Infected by 1. Shortness Elimination: Nil 5 2 10 Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 PM On-going
outbreak COVI-19. of breath Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil Engineer
COVID-19 2. Headache Engineering Control: Nil Engineering Control: Nil Supervisor
spreads 3. Cough & Administrative Control: Administrative Control: SMO / SDO,
primarily by sore throat 1.Twice daily temperature screening 1. Implementation of HR/Site Admin
respiratory 4. High 2.Looking out for respiratory symptoms such as SMMP
droplets, temperature cough or shortness of breath 2. Appointment of SMO
which come 5. Fatality 3.Denying site entry to unwell individuals 3. Contractor to provide
out through 4.Avoid contact with live animals including poultry letter of assurance from
Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent
Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
saliva or and birds, and consumption of raw and relevant Dormitory to
when we undercooked meats indicate that the Dormitory
sneeze. It is 5.Avoid crowded places and close contact with is safe and clearance
not in the people who are unwell or showing symptoms of from authorized
air. illness government agency.
6. Contractor need to monitor all workers working 4. All contractor MUST
on the workplace at all times so as not to sit declare the granted and
around and practice social distancing. approved list of workers at
7.Observe good personal hygiene the workplace and daily
8.Practice frequent hand washing with soap (e.g. monitoring of health
before handling food or eating, after going to the status of site personnel
toilet, or when hands are dirtied by respiratory 5.All contractor to submit
Secretions after coughing or sneezing). Use hand the Health
sanitizer if soap and water is not available. Declaration/personal
9.Wear a mask always not just when you have details records of all
respiratory symptoms such as a cough or runny personnel
nose 6All foreign workers to
10.Cover your mouth with a tissue paper when undergo swab test before
coughing or sneezing, and dispose the soiled allow to work on site
tissue paper in the rubbish bin immediately; and 7. All personnel
Seek medical attention promptly if you are feeling encouraged to download
unwell Trace Together app
11.Designated person conducting temperature 8.All personnel to check
screening must be equipped with Surgical mask, in/out with Safe Entry
latex hand gloves and disposal gown visitor management
12.Training and signages to disseminate to all system on site.
personnel to create awareness of COVID19. 9.All contractors’
13.Conduct all meetings between employees and personnel/worker to visit
with suppliers/ contractors virtually where only one clinic for check-
possible. ups. Otherwise, they must
14.Continuous communication to remind the inform the clinic of all
workforce of the necessary measure to be taken recent doctor visits over
15.Get frequent update from MOM and MOH past 14 days for any
website symptoms that may be
Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent
Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
PPE: Face mask related to COVID19.
10.Personnel/worker to
submit records of their
MCs and diagnoses
provided (only for
COVID19-related
symptoms
PPE: Nil
34 1. Shortness Elimination: Nil Elimination: Nil PM,
of breath Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil Engineer
2. Headache Engineering Control: Nil Engineering Control: Nil Supervisor
COVID-19 3. Cough & Administrative Control: Administrative Control: SMO / SDO,
spreads to sore throat 1. Affected employees will be on a 14-day LOA 1.All foreign workers to HR/Site Admin
co-workers 4. High upon arrival in Singapore and get their written undergo swab test before
primarily by temperature acknowledgement. 2.Continuous communication allow to work on site
Workers respiratory 5. Fatality with dormitory management 2.All contractor to submit
returning to droplets, 3.Get frequent update from MOM and MOH the Health
Singapore which come website 5 3 15 Declaration/personal 5 1 5
Ongoing
from home out through PPE: Face mask details records of all
leave saliva or personnel
when we 3. All contractor MUST
sneeze. It is declare the granted and
not in the approved list of workers at
air. the workplace and daily
monitoring of health
status of site personnel
PPE: Nil
35 Existing COVID-19 1. Shortness Elimination: Nil Elimination: Nil PM, Ongoing
workers spreads to of breath Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil Engineer
returning to co-workers 2. Headache Engineering Control: Nil Engineering Control: Nil Supervisor
work after 14 primarily by 3. Cough & Administrative Control: 5 2 10 Administrative Control: 5 1 5 SMO / SDO,
days respiratory sore throat 1.Twice daily temperature screening 1.All foreign workers to HR/Site Admin
LOA/SHN/Lo droplets, 4. High 2.Looking out for respiratory symptoms such as undergo swab test before
ck Down which come temperature
Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent
Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
out through 5. Fatality cough or shortness of breath allow to work on site
saliva or 3.Denying site entry to unwell individuals 2.All contractor to submit
when we 4.Practice frequent hand washing with soap (e.g. the Health
sneeze. It is before handling food or eating, after going to the Declaration/personal
not in the toilet, or when hands are dirtied by respiratory details records of all
air. secretions after coughing or sneezing). Use hand personnel
sanitizer if soap and water is not available. 3. All contractor MUST
5.Cover your mouth with a tissue paper when declare the granted and
coughing or sneezing, and dispose the soiled approved list of workers at
tissue paper in the rubbish bin immediately; and the workplace and daily
6.Seek medical attention promptly if you are monitoring of health
feeling unwell Wear a mask always not just when status of site personnel
you have respiratory symptoms PPE: Nil
7.Designated person conducting temperature
screening must be equipped with Surgical mask,
latex hand gloves and disposal gown
8.Continuous communication with dormitory
management
9.Get frequent update from MOM and MOH
website
PPE: Face mask
36 COVID-19 Elimination: Nil Elimination: Nil PM, Engineer
Workers spreads to Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil Supervisor Chief
working on co-workers Engineering Control: Nil Engineering Control: Nil SMO / SDO,
1 Shortness
site who are primarily by Administrative Control: Administrative Control: HR/Site Admin
of breath
staying in respiratory 1. Affected employees will be on a 14-day LOA 1.Implementation of
2. Headache
same droplets, and get their written acknowledgement. SMMP
3. Cough &
dormitory which come 2.Twice daily temperature screening 5 3 15 2. Contractor to provide 5 1 5 Ongoing
sore throat
with out through 3.Looking out for respiratory symptoms such as letter of assurance from
4. High
suspected saliva or cough or shortness of breath relevant Dormitory to
temperature
person with when we 4.Denying site entry to unwell individuals indicate that the Dormitory
5. Fatality
infected sneeze. It is 5.Practice good hygiene is safe and clearance
COVID19. not in the 6.Continuous communication with dormitory from authorized
air. 7.Get frequent update from MOM and MOH government agency.
Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent
Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
website management 3. All contractor MUST
PPE: Face mask declare the granted and
approved list of workers at
the workplace. and daily
monitoring of health
status of site personnel
4.All contractor to submit
the Health
Declaration/personal
details records of all
personnel
5.All foreign workers to
undergo swab test before
allow to work on site
6.All personnel
encouraged to download
TraceTogether app,
7.All personnel to check
in/out with Safe Entry
visitor management
system on site.
8.All contractors’
personnel/worker to visit
only one clinic for check-
ups. Otherwise, they must
inform the clinic of all
recent doctor visits over
past 14 days for any
symptoms that may be
related to COVID19.
9.Personnel/worker to
submit records of their
MCs and diagnoses
provided (only for
Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent
Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
COVID19-related
symptoms, including
acute respiratory
infections), and if they
were tested for COVID-19
and the results of their
tests.
PPE: Nil

37 Elimination: Nil Elimination: Nil PM,


Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil Engineer
Engineering Control: Nil Engineering Control: Nil Supervisor
Administrative Control: Administrative Control: SMO / SDO,
1. Personnel who is feeling unwell or showing 1.Implementation of HR/Site Admin
symptoms of illness should report to his employer, SMMP
COVID-19 leave the workplace and consult a doctor 2. Contractor to provide
spreads to immediately, even if symptoms may appear mild. letter of assurance from
co-workers 1 Shortness 2. Employers must track and record these cases. relevant Dormitory to
primarily by of breath 2. 3. For incapacitated or unconscious individuals – indicate that the Dormitory
Workers
respiratory Headache clear the area of other personnel and administer is safe and clearance
working on
droplets, 3. Cough & aid immediately. from authorized
site
which come sore throat 4. Employers should call 995 for an emergency 5 3 15 government agency. 5 1 5
suspected
out through 4. High ambulance to ferry them to the nearest hospital. 3. All contractor MUST
infected with
saliva or temperature 5.The Contractor should report to Nakano declare the granted and
COVID19.
when we 5. Fatality response team and MOH immediately if any approved list of workers at
sneeze. It is employee is suspected of having COVID19 the workplace. and daily
not in the symptoms monitoring of health
air. 6. Close contacts with the suspected person must status of site personnel
report to the Supervisor for contact tracing by 4.All contractor to submit
MOH. the Health
7.Infected area will be immediately vacated and Declaration/personal
cordon-off. details records of all
8.Carry out a thorough cleaning and disinfect all personnel
relevant workplace areas and assets exposed to 5.All foreign workers to
Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent
Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk
confirmed cases, in accordance to NEA guidelines undergo swab test before
allow to work on site
6.All personnel
encouraged to download
TraceTogether app,
7.All personnel to check
in/out with Safe Entry
visitor management
system on site.
8.All contractors’
personnel/worker to visit
only one clinic for check-
ups. Otherwise, they must
inform the clinic of all
recent doctor visits over
past 14 days for any
symptoms that may be
related to COVID19.
9.Personnel/worker to
submit records of their
MCs and diagnoses
provided (only for
COVID19-related
symptoms, including
acute respiratory
infections), and if they
were tested for COVID-19
and the results of their
tests.
PPE: Nil

Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent


Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk

Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent


Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk

Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent


Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk

Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent


Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk

Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent


Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

or 2. Risk Evaluation 3. Risk Control


Possible Control
Initial Risk Residual
Accident / Action by: Implement
Index Risk Index
N Ill Health Additional Risk Designation ed
Activity Hazard Existing Risk Control
o & Control Measures (Follow up- Yes / No
Persons- S L R S L R date)
at-Risk

Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent


Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

RISK REGISTER

Workplace Name: WOODLEIGH MIXED DEVLEPMENT @ BIDADARI RD


RA Ref No. Company Process / RA Approval Next Review RA Leader Remarks
Activity Date Date Name /
Location Designation
. FP-SD-WP-01 SPRINKLER FIRE PROTECTION / 27/NOV/2018 27/FEBRUARY/2021 JOSEPH S. / PM
ENGINEERING PTE COMMON AREAS
LTD BASEMENT TO
ROOF

Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent


Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent


Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
Table 1 - Severity categories and description

Level Severity Description


5 Catastrophic Fatality, fatal diseases or multiple major injuries
4 Major Serious injuries or life-threatening occupational disease (include
amputations, major fractures, multiple injuries, occupational cancer,
acute poisoning, deafness).
3 Moderate Injury requiring medical treatment or ill-health leading to disability
(includes lacerations, burns, sprains, minor fractures, dermatitis, work-
related upper limb disorders).
2 Minor Injury or ill-health requiring first aid only (includes minor cuts and
bruises, irritation, ill-health with temporary discomfort).
1 Negligible Not likely to cause injury or ill-health.

Table 2 - Likelihood categories and description

Level Livelihood Description


1 Rare Not expected to occur but still possible
2 Remote Not likely to occur under normal circumstances
3 Occasional Possible or known to occur
4 Frequent Common occurrence
5 Almost Certain Continual or repeated experience

Table 3 – Risk matrix to determine Risk Level

Likeliho
od Rare Remote Occasional Frequent Almost
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4) Certain (5)

Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5

Table 4 – Acceptability of risk and recommended actions

Acceptability
Risk Level Recommended actions
of risk

No additional risk control measures may be needed. However, frequent review may
Low Risk
Acceptable be needed to ensure that the risk level assigned is accurate and does not increase
(1-3)
over time.

A careful evaluation of the hazards should be carried out to ensure that the risk
level is reduced to as low as is practicable within a defined time period.
Medium
Moderately
Risk Interim risk control measures, such as administrative controls, may be
acceptable
(4-12) implemented.

Management attention is required.

High Risk level must be reduced to at least Medium Risk before work commences.

There should not be any interim risk control measures and risk control measures
High Risk Not
should not be overly dependent on personal protective equipment or appliances. If
(15-25) acceptable
need be, the hazard should be eliminated before work commences.

Immediate management intervention is required before work commences.


KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV

EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM

Rev 0 – 1 November 2019

You might also like