Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Housekeeping
Emergency Response
SG Secure
Environment Factor
Covid-19 outbreak
Workers working on site who are staying in same dormitory with suspected
person with infected COVID19.
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Dust Ill health and Elimination: Nil 3 2 6 Elimination: Nil 3 1 3 Site Supervisor YES
respiratory Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
problems Engineering Control: Engineering Control: Nil Foreman
Ventilation fan provided as necessary Administrative Control:
Close supervision by site Safety Supervisor
Administrative Control:
supervisor
Proper training and use of air mask
Training on safe use of hand tools to be PPE: Nil
conducted. .
Ensure equipment is checked daily for any
damage
No loose materials to be kept after work activity
Conduct toolbox meeting and LMRA briefing to
workforce.
PPE: helmet, googles, safety shoes harness,
Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent
Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
4 Threading Threading Cuts to hand Elimination: Nil 3 2 6 Elimination: Nil 3 1 3 Site Supervisor YES
the conduit tools Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
pipes. Engineering Control: Engineering Control: Nil Foreman
Ensure the conduit pipes are properly secured to Administrative Control:
threading machine Regular Tool box and Pre Safety Supervisor
Protective cover of threading area to be engaged Task Talk meeting to
and properly secured remind the workers
Administrative Control: PPE: Nil
Training on the usage of the threading tools to be
.
conducted.
No loose materials to be kept after work activity .
PPE: helmet, googles, safety shoes harness,
reflective vest hand glove
Dust Ill health and Elimination: Nil 3 2 6 Elimination: Nil 3 1 3 Site Supervisor YES
respiratory Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
problems Engineering Control: Engineering Control: Nil Foreman
Ventilation fan provided as necessary Administrative Control:
Close supervision by site Safety Supervisor
Administrative Control:
supervisor
Proper training and use of air mask
Training on safe use of hand tools to be PPE: Nil
conducted. .
Ensure equipment is checked daily for any
damage
No loose materials to be kept after work activity
Conduct toolbox meeting and LMRA briefing to
workforce.
PPE: helmet, googles, safety shoes harness,
reflective vest hand glove to be used accordingly
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Working at Serious Bodily Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Site Supervisor YES
height / Fall Injuries / fatal Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
from height Engineering Control: Nil Foreman
Engineering Control: Ensure trunking / cables in
place are within working platform area Administrative Control:
Ensure the trunking / cabling are properly secured Close supervision by work Safety Supervisor
before pulling work started at height supervisor.
A proper working platform shall be provided for all Daily checks of supervisor WAH Supervisor
cable pulling works. in charge before work
Administrative Control: commence
All workers designated to work at height at 2m and PPE: Nil
above must have WAH course for Workers
Certificate.
No loose materials to be kept after work activity
Permit-to-work (PTW) for worked at height to be
applied by WAH supervisor, submitted and
approved before commencement of work.
Safe work procedure (SWP) and fall prevention
plan (FPP) to be briefed before commencement of
work.
Ensure competent WAH Personnel to operate,
control and work on platform
Conduct toolbox meeting and LMRA briefing to
workforce
PPE:
Must wear safety harness with double lanyards
and be properly hooked to a rigid point at all times.
helmet, googles, safety shoes reflective vest hand
glove
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
15 Soil Person(s) Injury / Death Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Site Supervisor YES
excavation hit by to person(s) Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
works using excavator and / or Engineering Control: Nil Foreman
Engineering Control: Provision of danger warning
excavator damage to
sign at rear of excavator, side mirrors installed on Administrative Control:
property/ site
excavator, and conduct daily check on excavator Close supervision by Safety Supervisor
facility
machinery supervisor.
Provide proper barricade on work location PPE: Nil
Provide proper egress and access to excavated
pit
Administrative Control:
Only Registered Excavator Operator (REO /
PREO) shall be allowed to use the machine
Conduct toolbox meeting and LMRA briefing to
Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent
Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Toppling of Injury / Death Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Site Supervisor YES
Machinery to person(s) Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
and / or Engineering Control: Nil Foreman
Engineering Control: Excavation that exceeds 1.5
damage to m deep shall be provided with proper shoring and Administrative Control:
property/ site bracing to prevent the sides of the pit / trench from Close supervision by Safety Supervisor
facility
collapsing. supervisor.
Administrative Control: PPE: Nil
Excavation that exceeds 4.0 m deep shall be
provided with proper shoring and bracing
designed by PE to prevent the sides of the pit /
trench from collapsing.
Only Registered Excavator Operator (REO /
PREO) shall be allowed to use the machine
To even ground during operation of excavator to
prevent toppling
Competent operator to ensure excavator is
working within safe work load
Conduct toolbox meeting and LMRA briefing to
workforce
Daily equipment checks by supervisor before work
commence
Permit-to-work (PTW) for excavation to be applied
PPE: Safety helmet, safety shoes, reflective vest
safety goggles and ear plug
16 Working in Heat stress Ill health / Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Site Supervisor YES
hot condition / stroke fatal Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
or under the Engineering Control: Nil Engineering Control: Nil Foreman
sun Administrative Control:
Administrative Control:
Close supervision Safety Supervisor
Supervisor to educate worker on sufficient drinking
Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent
Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
17 Workers Mental Ill health / Elimination: Nil 4 1 4 Elimination: Nil 4 1 4 Site Supervisor YES
mental fatigue injury to own Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
health and self Engineering Control: Nil Engineering Control: Nil Foreman
human factor Administrative Control: Administrative Control:
Adequate training of new workers by competent Close supervision Safety Supervisor
supervisor supervisor.
Proper monitoring of work hours does not exceed PPE: Nil Management Team
authority regulations
Adequate rest time and days off
Supervisor to observe workers behavior Conduct
toolbox meeting and LMRA briefing to workforce
PPE: Nil
18 Housekeepin Trip/slip and Head injury/ Elimination: Nil 3 2 6 Elimination: Nil 3 1 3 Site Supervisor YES
g falling fracture/ hand Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
injury/ cuts n Engineering Control: Nil Foreman
Engineering Control:
bruises
Placing of materials and tools inside a barricaded Administrative Control:
Supervisor to educate Safety Supervisor
area. Good access to be maintained at all times to
access to the materials and tools. worker on sufficient tools
Periodic housekeeping of work area. and materials to be
brought to work area.
Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent
Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
20 SG Secure Environmen Bodily injury Elimination: Nil Elimination: Nil Management YES
t factor / Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
emergency Engineering Control: Nil
situation 3 2 6 Engineering Control: Nil 3 1 3 Site Supervisor
Administrative Control: Administrative Control:
Management/Supervisors/Workers(if possible) to Close supervision
download SG secure app for up to date supervisor and daily Foreman
Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent
Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
23 Installation Falling Serious Bodily Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Site Supervisor YES
Work using materials Injuries Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
Mobile Engineering Control: Engineering Control: Nil Foreman
scaffold Administrative Control:
Loose tools to be kept in a bag. Work area to be
barricaded with signage Close supervision by work Safety Supervisor
Administrative Control: at height supervisor.
Only competent person to erect/certify scaffold Daily checks of supervisor WAH Supervisor
Check validity of scaffold tag before using the in charge before work
scaffold. commence
Do not push/shift mobile scaffold when someone Adhere to safe work
is on it. procedures.
Do not step on mid or guard rail for work purpose. PPE: Nil
Castor wheels of mobile scaffold must be locked
in a stationary position when in use.
Permit-to-work (PTW) for worked at height to be
applied by WAH supervisor, submitted and
approved before commencement of work.
Ensure competent WAH Personnel to operate,
control and work on platform
Appointed watchmen to keep a lookout for
unauthorized entry.
Safe work procedure (SWP) and fall prevention
plan (FPP) to be briefed before commencement of
work.
Supervisors and workers to be briefed on daily
Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent
Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
24 Hoisting Toppling of Serious Injury Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Site Supervisor YES
tower crane / Death to Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
of
during lifting person(s) Engineering Control: Barricade the area of Engineering Control: Nil Foreman
Machineri due to unloading / loading Administrative Control: Lifting supervisor
es / overload or
improper Ensure that tower crane is constructed duly Close supervision by site
Materials / certified and inspected by competent person or PE supervisor
hoisting
Equipmen Administrative Control: PPE: Nil
t to To ensure all material/equipment loading to be
Materials within safe working load as per LM certification
Receiving Do a pre-hoist check to ensure that the allowable
Platform SWL at the specified radius to be hoisted is more
(MRP) than the weight of load
All personnel to stay clear from suspended load
and radius of swing
Lifting Plan briefing to group of workers
Qualified lifting personnel (lifting supervisor, rigger
& signalman) appointed
Crane Operator to ensure no overloaded
PTW for Lifting to be approved prior to start work
Follow Safe Work Procedures (SE-SWP-01)
Lifting plan in place
PPE:
helmet, googles, safety shoes harness reflective
vest hand glove to be used accordingly
Failure of Serious bodily Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Site Supervisor YES
MRP due to injury / fatality Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
Overloading / damage to Engineering Control: Nil Safety Supervisor
Engineering Control: Nil
property
Administrative Control: Administrative Control:
Close supervision by work WAH Supervisor
Ensure material weight do not exceed MRP Safe
Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent
Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
MRP Serious bodily Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Site Supervisor YES
injury / fatality Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
failure
/ damage to Engineering Control: Nil Safety Supervisor
due to Engineering Control: Nil
property Administrative Control:
COS and Administrative Control:
Ensure PE design and COS in order before Close supervision by work WAH Supervisor
PE
working on MRP at height supervisor.
Only competent person to supervise WAH works Daily checks of supervisor
Conduct training on safe use of material receiving in charge before work
platform commence
Supervisors and workers to be briefed on visual Refresher training of Safe
check of material receiving platform in good use of material receiving
condition platform
Permit-to-work (PTW) for worked at height to be
PPE: Nil
applied by competent WAH personnel, submitted
and approved before commencement of work.
Safe work procedure (SWP) and fall prevention
plan (FPP) to be briefed before commencement of
work.
Ensure compliance with material loading platform
Safe Workload
Conduct toolbox meeting and LMRA briefing to
workforce
Adhere to safe work procedures.
PPE:
Must always wear safety harness with double
lanyards and be properly hooked to a rigid point .
helmet, googles safety shoes reflective vest hand
glove
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
31 Painting of Fire Hazard Bodily injuries Elimination: Nil 4 2 8 Elimination: Nil 4 1 4 PM / WSHS / YES
pipe works Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil SS
Engineering Control: Nil Engineering Control: Nil
Administrative Control: Administrative Control:
Paint cans must be stored at a secure place away Close supervision
from open flame supervisor and daily
Always place a fire extinguisher near working area checks
PPE: Use proper PPE (face mask ) PPE: Nil
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Working at Serious bodily Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 Site Supervisor YES
height / Fall injury / fatal Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
from height Engineering Control: Nil Foreman
Engineering Control: Loose tools to be kept in a
bag. Work area to be barricaded with signage and Administrative Control:
clear at all times Close supervision by work Safety Supervisor
Administrative Control: at height supervisor.
Only competent person to erect/certify scaffold Daily checks of supervisor WAH Supervisor
Check validity of scaffold tag before using the in charge before work
scaffold. commence
Check and comply with scaffold SWL when PPE: Nil
installing materials
Conduct training on safe use of working platform
Do not step on mid or guard rail for work purpose.
Supervisors and workers to be briefed on daily
visual check of working platform in good condition
Permit-to-work (PTW) for worked at height to be
applied by WAH supervisor, submitted and
approved before commencement of work.
Safe work procedure (SWP) and fall prevention
plan (FPP) to be briefed before commencement of
work.
Ensure competent WAH Personnel to operate,
control and work on platform
Conduct toolbox meeting and LMRA briefing to
workforce
Adhere to safe work procedures.
PPE:
All workers must wear safety harness with double
lanyards and be properly hooked to a rigid point at
all times.
Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent
Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Overhead Minor Injury Elimination: Nil 3 2 6 Elimination: Nil 3 1 3 Site Supervisor YES
Hazards Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil
Engineering Control: Engineering Control: Nil Foreman
Loose materials to be kept in toolbox or working Administrative Control:
buckets Close supervision by work Safety Supervisor
Administrative Control: at height supervisor. WAH Supervisor
Brief workers of potential hazards on overhead Daily checks of supervisor
services prior to work commence in charge before work
Proper housekeeping of platform commence
before/during/after work commencement Adhere to safe work
Do not stand on material or railing to over reach procedures.
the work location. PPE: Nil
Close supervision by work at height supervisor.
Conduct toolbox meeting and LMRA briefing to
workforce.
Adhere to safe work procedures.
PPE: All workers must wear safety harness with
double lanyards and be properly hooked to a rigid
point at all times helmet, googles, reflective vest,
hand glove
33 Covid-19 Infected by 1. Shortness Elimination: Nil 5 2 10 Elimination: Nil 5 1 5 PM On-going
outbreak COVI-19. of breath Substitution: Nil Substitution: Nil Engineer
COVID-19 2. Headache Engineering Control: Nil Engineering Control: Nil Supervisor
spreads 3. Cough & Administrative Control: Administrative Control: SMO / SDO,
primarily by sore throat 1.Twice daily temperature screening 1. Implementation of HR/Site Admin
respiratory 4. High 2.Looking out for respiratory symptoms such as SMMP
droplets, temperature cough or shortness of breath 2. Appointment of SMO
which come 5. Fatality 3.Denying site entry to unwell individuals 3. Contractor to provide
out through 4.Avoid contact with live animals including poultry letter of assurance from
Likelihood Rare Remote Occasional Frequent
Almost Certain (5)
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4)
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
RISK REGISTER
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
KAJIMA (S) TIONG SENG JV EHSP-02-F1 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM
Rev 0 – 1 November 2019
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
Table 1 - Severity categories and description
Likeliho
od Rare Remote Occasional Frequent Almost
Severity (1) (2) (3) (4) Certain (5)
Catastrophic (5) 5 10 15 20 25
Major (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Moderate (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Minor (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 5
Acceptability
Risk Level Recommended actions
of risk
No additional risk control measures may be needed. However, frequent review may
Low Risk
Acceptable be needed to ensure that the risk level assigned is accurate and does not increase
(1-3)
over time.
A careful evaluation of the hazards should be carried out to ensure that the risk
level is reduced to as low as is practicable within a defined time period.
Medium
Moderately
Risk Interim risk control measures, such as administrative controls, may be
acceptable
(4-12) implemented.
High Risk level must be reduced to at least Medium Risk before work commences.
There should not be any interim risk control measures and risk control measures
High Risk Not
should not be overly dependent on personal protective equipment or appliances. If
(15-25) acceptable
need be, the hazard should be eliminated before work commences.