Data

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 Sample 4 Sample 1

11.55 11.62 11.91 12.02
11.62 11.69 11.36 12.02 Mean
11.52 11.59 11.75 12.05 Standard Error
11.75 11.82 11.95 12.18 Median
11.90 11.97 12.14 12.11 Mode
11.64 11.71 11.72 12.07 Standard Deviation
11.80 11.87 11.61 12.05 Sample Variance
12.03 12.10 11.85 11.64 Kurtosis
11.94 12.01 12.16 12.39 Skewness
11.92 11.99 11.91 11.65 Range
12.13 12.20 12.12 12.11 Minimum
12.09 12.16 11.61 11.90 Maximum
11.93 12.00 12.21 12.22 Sum
12.21 12.28 11.56 11.88 Count
12.32 12.39 11.95 12.03 Confidence Level(95.0%)
11.93 12.00 12.01 12.35
11.85 11.92 12.06 12.09
11.76 11.83 11.76 11.77 point estimate
12.16 12.23 11.82 12.20 lower limits
11.77 11.84 12.12 11.79 upper limits
12.00 12.07 11.60 12.30
12.04 12.11 11.95 12.27 confidence coeffecient
11.98 12.05 11.96 12.29 level of significance (alpha)
12.30 12.37 12.22 12.47
12.18 12.25 11.75 12.03
11.97 12.04 11.96 12.17
12.17 12.24 11.95 11.94
Yes, because the sample values are closer to the
11.85 11.92 11.89 11.97 plausible.From Yes, it looks reasonable because
12.30 12.37 11.88 12.23 assumption of o.21.
Sample 2 fails to reject H0Sample because the p
12.15 12.22 11.93 12.25 value is 0.0060.01. We can't rule out H0 since va
mean 11.96 12.03 11.89 12.08 If a = 0.01 is increased to 0.05, what are the con
level of significance in a=type 1 mistake rose, th
median 11.96 12.03 11.92 12.08

Page 1
Data

Page 2
 Data

mple 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

11.95866667 Mean 12.02866667 Mean 11.889

0.040231323 Standard Error 0.040231323 Standard Error0.037824003
11.955 Median 12.025 Median 11.92
11.93 Mode 12 Mode 11.95
0.220356034 Standard Deviation 0.220356034 Standard Devi 0.207170594
0.048556782 Sample Variance 0.048556782 Sample Varian0.042919655
-0.62364414 Kurtosis -0.62364414 Kurtosis 0.113237323
-0.23504009 Skewness -0.23504009 Skewness -0.52254865
0.8 Range 0.8 Range 0.86
11.52 Minimum 11.59 Minimum 11.36
12.32 Maximum 12.39 Maximum 12.22
358.76 Sum 360.86 Sum 356.67
30 Count 30 Count 30
0.082282295 Confidence Level(95.0%) 0.082282295 Confidence Le0.077358771

11.958667 point estimate 12.028667 point estima 11.889

11.876384 lower limits 11.946384 lower limits 11.811641
12.040949 upper limits 12.110949 upper limits 11.966359

0.95 confidence coeffecien 0.95 confidence 0.95

-0.94 level of significance (a -0.94 level of sig -0.94

mple values are closer to the population standard deviation assumption of o.21, it appears
t looks reasonable because the sample values are closer to the population standard deviation

ect H0Sample because the p-value =0.482>0.01. Sample 3 fails to reject H0sample4 because the p-
We can't rule out H0 since value =0.039>0.001.
ed to 0.05, what are the consequences of increasing the level of significance to a higher value? If the
n a=type 1 mistake rose, the level of significance in increased to a greater value.

Page 3
Data

Page 4
 Data

Sample 4

Mean 12.08133333
Standard Error0.037630183
Median 12.08
Mode 12.02
Standard Devi 0.206108999
Sample Varian 0.04248092
Kurtosis -0.11579356
Skewness -0.38963159
Range 0.83
Minimum 11.64
Maximum 12.47
Sum 362.44
Count 30
Confidence Le0.076962365

point estima 12.081333

lower limits 12.004371
upper limits 12.158296

confidence 0.95
level of sig -0.94

Page 5