Hor S Contract HSE Plan Template

CONTRACT HSE PLAN
(Mode 1, 2 Medium/High Risk Contracts Template -Please delete when finalized)
Contractor Company
NIGERBLOSSOM DRILLING COMPANY LIMITED
Subcontractor Companies PRIMS CRUISIM- CATEERING SERVICES

1.
2. HOPSON HAULAGE –RIG MOVERS
3. PHOENIX HOSPITAL – MEDICAL RETAINERSHIP

Description of Contract
PROVISION OF HWU/CJU FOR WORKOVER & ABANDONING
OPERATIONS FOR BOTH LAND AND SWAMP OF THE NIGERDELTA
LOCATION
Contract HSSE Risk Level MEDIUM LEVEL

Contract Mode
Contract Starte -End date
Printed copies are

uncontrolled
Approvals
Role Name Company Signature Date
Prepared by (Cont. HSE Off/Mgr)
Reviewed by (Line SE Support)
Approved by (Contractor CEO)
Approved by (Contract Holder)
Table of Content
1. Objective of the Contract HSE Plan…………………………………………………………………………………..
2. Scope of the Work……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
3. Schedule pf Work…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
4. HSSE Management System……………………………………………………………………………………………...
4.1 Leadership & Commitment………………………………………………………………………………………..
4.2 Policy & Strategic Objectives……………………………………………………………………………………..
4.3 Organization, Resources and Responsibilities……………………………………………………………
4.4 Risk Management……………………………………………………………………………………………………..
4.5 HSE Planning & Procedures……………………………………………………………………………………….
4.6 Implementation, Monitoring and Reporting……………………………………………………………..
4.7 Assurance (audits/inspections) …………………………………………………………………………………
4.8 Management review…………………………………………………………………………………………………
4.9 Remedial Actions Tracking………………………………………………………………………………………..
5. Appendices…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
5.1 Retainership/HMO agreement…………………………………………………………………………………
5.2 Other attachments…………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Printed copies are

uncontrolled
1. Objective of the Contract HSSE Plan
Demonstrate to the Shell Contract Holder how the contractor applies its HSSE Management System to safely deliver the scope of the contract. This Contract HSSE
Plan should specifically identify how to manage the risks in the scope, as well as monitor and continuously improve the HSSE performance through the duration of
the Contract with Shell.
It is the objective of TECON in this contract to conduct his activities in such a way as to:
 Consider first the health and safety of its employees, contractors, and third parties who may be affected.
 Protect the environment, prevent pollution, and seek improvements in the efficient use of natural resources.
 Ensure that health, safety, and environment (HSE) matters have priority among business objectives.
TECON will carry out this policy through the HWU project action plans supported by management. We shall always require the commitment of all employee in this project to achieve these
objectives.
All our managers and supervisors connected tp this HWO contrat are accountable for the health and safety of those working under their control and are responsible for the promotion
and implementation of all SPDC and TECON policies to the later.
Our goal thrughout this project is to eliminate any form of accidents, injuries and job related illnesses..
HSE objective
On Health, TECON seeks to conduct its activities in such a way as to ensure the health of employees,contractors and third parties.Our management will continually update and implement the
measures necessary to maintain good health of personnels involved in this project.
On Safet,TECON believes that all injuries are preventable and we s h a l l actively promote high standards of safety consciousness through out this contract. We are also committed to
providing high quality equipment, training, and quality PPEs. There are adequate emergency plans to be employed for on various HSE protection.
On Environmental Impact, TECON shall:reduce all emissions and discharges of wastes which have negative impact on the environment. We shall adopt improved technical procedures to ensure
safe operations of all equipments and protect the environment in compliance with relevant l o c a l & international regulations
Our targets in this contract is that; All personnel involved in this project, including sub-contractors shall target of “Zero LTI & Zero leak To Our Environment (Goal Zero target)
The HSE performance during this project shall be monitored continuously by all personnel on board to be championed by Our dedicated HSE Coordinators and HWU supervisors who shall be taking a
statistical records of all HSE Key performance indicators (Kpi) both lead amd lag kpi to monitor and evaluate the status of safety impact throughout the contract
.
2. Scope of the Work
Provide a short description of the scope of works for the contract.
(A diagram to explain the scope may also be provided)
This plan is written for contractor works completed by CONTRACTOR A and their sub-contractors (CONTRACTOR B and CONTRACTOR C). The scope of work covered by this HSE plan includes…The work will
take place at ….The expected number of contractors working on site is…
PROVISION OF THE HWU/ CJU FOR WORK OVER / D & R SERVICES AT LAND OR SWAMP LOCATION IN THE NIGERDELTA REGION
A TYPICAL HAC LAYOUT DIAGRAM OF THE HWOU ON A LAND LOCATION
Printed copies are

uncontrolled
The project involves the following activities on SPDC facilities
Task Activity
1
Site visit for wellhead inspection/route survey SPDC/TECON Team
2
Community MOU / FTO settlemet -SPDC CRO/ TECON reps
3
Route / Site Preparation - TECON/spdc team
4
Hotel accomodation / camp setup arrangement- SPDC apprroved hotel/Cateerer Prims cruisons
Equipment premob & certification validation for equipment and personnel(process safety)- SPDC Acredicted Third Party
5
Inspectors/SPDC Premob Teram
6
Mobilse the TECON Cew to the location with a roubust security escort of lead & chase- C&i leasing logistics services
7
Mobilse the TECON Cew to the location with a roubust security escort of lead & chase-C&i leasing logistics services
8
Rig move from TECON base to spdc rigsite(land or swamp by TECON/SPDC approved Rig mover Contractor
Printed copies are

uncontrolled
9
Equipment spoting according to SPDC approved HAC layout daigram - HWO Crew
10
BOP& other well contol equipmenttesting / well head preparation/nd of xmas tree
11
If wellhead pressures zero, continue with next item. If well is life, kill well with at least one circulation
12 Carry Out Xmas Tree Retrieval / BOP Installation Drill
13
Function test unit ok for acceptance by spdcteam- HWO Crew
14
Check wellhead pressures and carry out wellhead integrity. Prepare & Mix well kill Brine. HWO Crew
15 ND Xmas Tree, NU BOP / Hanger Landing Joint c/w Kelly Cork /TIW. Test wellhead/BOP connection.
16 Test BOPs.
17 Retrieve CT in hole.
18 Retrieve old Completion tubing.
19 Bit & Scraper run
20 L/D Drill pipe
21 Run in hole new completions tubing
22 Land completion string and te st same
23 ND / BOPs. NU and test Xmas Tree
24 Lift Well to Live
25 Hand over well
Printed copies are

uncontrolled
3 Schedule of Work
Work duration starting 19th Feb. 2019 to 2nd April. 2019

S/
Task Week 2 Week 3 Week 5 Week 6 WEEK7
N Week 1 Week 4
Well 017 Access road
A
1 Manual clearing of bushes along road
Printed copies are

uncontrolled
section 1 -
Mechanical clearing and stripping of top
2 soil 0
Sand supply, filling and compacting
3
Duramat transfer and laying
4
Hardwood supply, laying and
5 compacting
Maintanance actrivities
6
Well 017 site preparation
B
Transfer of duramat
7
Manual clearing of location
8
Mechanical stripping of top soil
9
Sand supply, grading and compacting
10
Perimeter Fencing
11
Laying of duramat
12
Camp site preparation
C
Transfer of duramat
13
14
15
16
Perimeter Fencing for location
17
18 Laying of duramat
Maintance activities
C well 015 site preparation
Transfer of duramat
13
14
15
16
17
Laying of duramat
18

well 018 site preparation
C
Printed copies are

uncontrolled
Transfer of duramat
13
14
15
16
17
Retrieving and Laying of duramat
18

Week 2 Week 3 Week 5 Week 6 Week 6
Week 1 Week 4
4.0 HSSE Management System (Plan, Do, Check, Adjust Improvement cycle)
The contractor has a documented process, including Procedures and work instructions or an HSSE management system which shows that the Contractor can manage the HSSE
Risk.
This contains information on each of the following 8 elements:
Tecon has a lot of documented process like the HSE CASE, THE HSE MANUAL, THE HSE MS (which contains the 8 elements of theTECON HSE MS) as well as various Standard Operating
Procedures (SOPs) . Also, various Work Instructions Contained in Well Program and specific wort instruction from Shell technical Team are alsoavailable at the work site
4.1 Leadership & Commitment
Which elements of Leadership & Commitment that you provide to the company would you apply in this contract?
In this HWU PROJECT WEATHER LAND OR SWAMP, the management of Tecon shall provide a visible leadership and commitment to HSE management of the project.
Printed copies are

uncontrolled
What No. of Visible Leadership visits related to the contract will be carried out by business leaders, managers and supervisors?
LEADERSHIP VISIT TO THE RIG SITE ARE
 CEOs VISIT
 INCIDENT FOLLOWUP VISIT
 AUDIT VISIT& INSPECTION
 MGT REVIEW VISIT
This shall be demonstrated through the participation of various management in our various routine HSE meetings, emergency drill exercise, inspection,Audit as well incident investigation exercise both
at the rig site and base. Other aspects such as briefing and provision of adequate resources for HSE management. L
How will your leadership review HSSE performance data for the contract?
Q3 Q4
EHS MS KEY PERFORMANCE 2020 Q1 Q2
FOCUS AREA TEAM ACTIONS UNIT ACTION PARTY REMARKS
ELEMENT INDICATORS (KPI) TGTS TGT TGT
TGT TGT
Management rig visit Quarterly visit to rigs No. 2 1 1 1 1 EHS Manager/Operations Manager
Present a safety monthly meeting.

1
Leadership Tecon Managers to facilitate Minutes of meetings presided
No. 8 2 2 2 2 HSE Manager
2 and EHSQ monthly meeting over by the Manager to be posted
Commitment in paperless portal
3
HWO Operations Manager HSE Manager/ HWO manager
Conduct inspections of visit of site. Corrective actions to % 100 100 HWO Operations Manager ./ QHSE Manager
facility be reviewed with Site supervisor.
Prepare/Update/Maintain Procedures /Reviews/Updates to

Complete list of HWO be signed off by HWO Operations No. 1 1 Casing Manager and EHSQ Manager
4
Policies and Operations procedures Manager and EHSQ Manager
Procedures

Attend all clients EHS %
Share feedback with team 100 1 1 1 1 Operations Manager and EHSSQ Rep.
meetings
Organizational Review /Update %

structure, applicability of EHSQ
5 Review & Revise by Q4 100 100 HWO Manager. and EHSQ Mgr.
resources, Policies and Procedures in
standards and HWO Operations
documentation
Review all HWO activity Reviewed Alerts & LFIs to be No. 4 1 1 1 1 HWO Manager. and EHSSQ Rep.
related to IADC Alerts and documented
Printed copies are
uncontrolled
Clients LFI monthly
Incident Management:
Fatality 0, SIC 0; MTC 0; RWC
There shall be ZERO % 100 100 100 100 100 Team Lead and EHSQ Rep.
0, be Zero Incident
Hazards and incident in HWO operations
6 Effects
Management HWO team to develop
Share lessons with Base once
Lesson learnt from Incident No. 8 2 2 2 2 Team Lead and EHSQ Rep.
every Half year
in operations
Review/update Emergency %
7 Response plan for HWO Sign off by EHS manager by Q4 100 100 Team Lead and EHSQ Rep.
activity
Planning
--8
FTW FFD Medical checks %
with approved Hospital for 100% compliance for HWO team 100 Team Lead and EHSQ Rep.
all team members
Prepare /deploy EHS

EHS Reports to be submitted for
Reporting template for No. Team Lead and EHSQ Supervisor As required
Implementatio each activity on a well
HWO KPI
9 n and
Monitoring
Attend all clients EHS %
Share feedback with team 100 Team Lead and EHSQ Rep.
meetings
Audit reports to categorize %

EHS Audit of HWO
vendors into three color bands 100 100 Team Lead and EHSQ Rep.
Activities
10 Audit Red Yellow & Green
No. Team Lead and EHSQ Rep.
11 Management Hold bi-annual SQ Review SQ feedback follow-up of actions. No. 8 2 2 2 2 Team Lead and EHSQ Rep.
Review with Client Cascade learnings to field
operations
Printed copies are

uncontrolled
After Action review with AAR should be documented to
2 2
Client for every incidence or capture improvements with time % 100 25 25 Team Lead and EHSQ Rep.
5 5
end of well bound action items.
Leadership shall review the HSSE performance on this contract during the periodic Business Performance Review meetings with SPDC as well as reviewing critical issues during tool box neetings or
pre job safety meetings with all project personnel including sub contractors and shell staff.
How will your leadership commit to safety in this contract and how will you engage staff around Shell’s HSSE rules?
4.2 Policy & Strategic Objective

o How will you set annual Targets to drive continuous performance improvement on the contract?
Tecon has an all , embraxing policy statement covering Health, Safety, security and Ebvirobnent. The Tecon HSE policies are sigbed by the CEO/President of Tecon Group. These policies are displayed
visibly in all notice boards, HSSE documents like handbooks, hse Ms doxuments, HSE PLANDOCUMENT, that are available at the HWU rig site offices. Also spdc policies are equaly displayed at the rig site
for all personnel to assess.
o How will you develop HSSE Objectives for the Contract?

TECON HSE POLICY STATEMENTS
Tecon Oil Services Ltd. is committed to providing and maintaining a safe and healthy work environment for all workers including its contractors, clients, visitors and the public.
All health and safety risk will be assessed, eliminated, or controlled as far as it is reasonably practicable. Our statement of general policy is as follows:
 The Health and Safety of workers is first priority in Tecon oil services Ltd. hence accountable for preventing workplace incidents, injuries and illnesses.
 Managers and supervisors will be held accountable for the health and safety of staff under their control.
 There will be consultations between management and employees for effective implementation of the policies.
 Management will provide information, instruction and training in CASHES matters to all categories of staff so as to enhance the awareness of their safety responsibilities
and ensure strong individual commitments and contribution to the health, Safety and Protection of the Environment.
 Management will ensure that unsafe conditions, which contribute to injury, damage or operation interruptions, are promptly, reported, corrected and action take to prevent
their recurrence, and all accidents are reported and investigated so that immediate corrective action can be taken.
Printed copies are

uncontrolled
 The company will respect the communities in which it operates by maintaining high environmental standards.
 The company is committed to complying with all national health, safety and environmental laws and regulations applicable to its operations as well as complying with
cliental and organizations requirement to which it subscribes.
 All employees, contractors and other persons are expected to perform their duties and responsibilities in a safe and healthy manner and should take reasonable care for the
health and safety of themselves and others to achieve an accident free workplace.
 Management will assure adequate resources are available to implement her policy programs.
 Management will ensure continual improvement through review and revision of the policies as necessary and at periodic intervals.
Tecon Oil Services Ltd. Has established these HSE policies for the safety of all Tecon stakeholders. All workers, contractors and other persons are to comply with these policies
and participate in health and safety program activities to achieve her goal of zero accident.
Dated: January, 2018
CASIMIR MADUAFOKWA
PRESIDENT/CEO
o How will you actively communicate your HSSE Commitment and Policy in the Contract?
Tecon strategic objective and HSSE target for this HWU contract
The strategy for implementation of Tecon Oil Services Ltd HSE policy includes the writing and implementation of annual HSE Plan. The HSE plan implementation is
monitored and serves as tool for continuous improvement process.
Audits, inspections site visits, reviews etc, shall be conducted in a structured manner so as to provide on the spot indication of HSE status of the company at any point in
time.
Our targets is that; all tecon personnels involved in this project, including sub-contractors and xisitors shall attain a target of “Zero LTI & Zero leak to the
Printed copies are

uncontrolled
operating Environment (Goal Zero target)
The HSSE performance during this project shall be monitored continuously by all personnel on board to be championed by Our dedicated HSE Coordinators and HWU
supervisors who shall be taking a statistical records of all HSE Key performance indicators (Kpi) both lead amd lag kpi to monitor and evaluate the status of safety impact
throughout the contract
.
4.3 Organization, Resources and Responsibilities
o Describe the organization in detail (with names and functions) delivering the Contract and their roles, responsibilities and competencies required
including required trainings to sustain their competence during the project.
o How do you ensure that all staff are effectively inducted to work on the Contract? Include as part of the training plan.
o Explain how you will manage and communicate organizational change if it takes place in the contract related to key positions requiring competence
assurance.
o What is communication plan during the project e.g. HSE Meetings, Audit frequency, Management Facility Engagement etc.
ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES
The roles of Key officers of Tecon with respect to individuals job responsibilities are outlined in the first Edition of Tecon Oil Services Ltd HSE manual. The organizational structure is as shown
HWO SERVICES/LOGISTICS SUPPORT MANAGER AND MARINE OPERATIONS MANAGER
 Ensure staff complies with HSE Policies and procedures while on duty
 Holding monthly HSE meetings with subordinates.
 Conducting site/field inspections and visits.
 Arranging competency training for subordinates
 Attending monthly HSE meeting with SPDC.
 Ensuring that all HSE related information is cascaded down to all staff and subcontractors.
 Ensuring that HSE targets against plans are achieved
 Ensuring that safe work procedures are followed in execution of jobs.
OPERATORS /CAPTAINS CREW HEADS
 Briefing staff on safe work methods.

 Conduct Toolbox meetings.
 Ensuring that staff are kitted with the appropriate PPE, and that correct tools are used for the job.
 Participate in incident/inspection within the work area.
 Conduct work around inspection within the work area
Printed copies are

uncontrolled
 Ensure good housekeeping is maintained within the work area.
Carry out Hazard identification on site and turn in report to the client via safety Department.
SUB CONTRACTOR’S RESPONSIBILITIES
Tecon contractors are expected to comply with the requirements of our CASHES policy and Manual as they may from time to time be exposed to similar hazards while executing our jobs.
Every subcontractor must:
 Adopt similar HSE policies as TOS, SPDC, or any of our clients

 Comply with our annual CASHES plan as it affects them
 Comply with all necessary certifications for both personnel and equipment prior to their engagement in our operations.
 Comply with specific requirements, HSE rules and regulations etc.
 Comply investigation and report accidents as applicable
 Carry out staff training and motivation up to the same standards as TOS in the HSE aspects of their jobs.
Client’s Supervisor on Site.

The DSV or the company man will be the Company Representative on the HWOU. She/he will be the person in charge at the well site during well control operations and is responsible for ensuring that all
well control programs are carried out in a safe manner and according to the plan. The client supervisor on site is responsible to provide regular update to the Workover Superintendent on the progress of
the well control operations. The WSR also liaises with the HWOU Supervisor providing guidance and direction for the well control operation and ensuring that the safety of the crew is the primary focus in
any well control operations.
HWOU Project Manager –

The HWOU P r o je c t Manager is responsible for ensuring that the well objectives as set in the Drilling Program are met in line with no harm to people, damage to asset and environment and
compliance with regulation.
 The TECON HWOU Project Manager, will exercise operational control and management of inter- faces between TECON and Client’s Management with regard to day to day
operations of the HWU.
 He will ensure that the TECON Management and Clients are kept informed of all relevant safety and operational details.
 The HWU Manager will ensure that the TECON policies are followed, relevant legislation and con- tractual obligations to TECON are met and day-to-day operations are carried out in
accordance with good oilfield practice.
 The Contractor Project Manager shall designate competent personnel to fill these duties during his ab- sence.
QHSE MANAGER
 The Head of TECON HSE team and provides support to TECON Operations/Project Manager on the HWOU HSE matters.
Printed copies are

uncontrolled
 provides guidance and direction to HWU organization on implementing TECON HSE Policies
 Conducts audits, inspections, training and health checks, monitors HSE performance and provides assurance to TECON leadership as required by HSE Management System.
 Manages HSE incident and maintain database of all incidents and associated learning’s.
HWOU Supervisor:
The HWOU Supervisor must possess a current and valid Well Control Certificate.
The HWOU Supervisor will ensure that all HWOU Personnel understand their Well Control Roles & Responsibilities before the Daily Job Work Scope starts - every day/every shift - during the
PTSM. During a well control event, the HWOU Supervisor will be in direct communication
with the Company Representative. The HWOU Supervisor will provide instruction to the HWOU Work Basket Operator (Driller equivalent) and provide guidance to the entire HWOU crew
throughout the well control event. The HWOU Supervisor (or his designate) will operate the choke, during a well control event, as instructed by the client representative onsite.
The HWOU Supervisor will recheck Manifold Valve alignment, with the assistance of the Well
Watch Floorman to monitor for flow through the Choke Manifold/Gas Buster at the Mud Tank.
1) Upon completions of the well kill operations, if flow is detected, the HWOU Supervisor will close the manifold valves and continue Monitoring & Recording Well
Pressures and notify the Chevron WSR.
If no flow is detected, the HWOU Supervisor will notify the Chevron site supervisor.
HWOU Work Baske jack Operator:
The HWOU Work Basket Operator must possess a current and valid Well Control Certificate. On noticing a well control situation, the HWOU Work Basket Operator will sounds the Alarm/Horn/Verbal Alarm
with Hand Held Radio and positions the work string box connection at working height in the Work Basket (to be able to stab FOSV & Close). After the FOSV has been installed & closed the HWOU Work
Basket Operator will reposition the work string connection above/below the appropriate BOP Ram and close the BOP Ram using the Work Basket BOP Aux Remote Closing Panel.
HWOU Assistant Operator :
The HWOU Assistant Operator must possess a current, valid, Well Control Certificate. HWOU Assistant Operator will assist with lifting, installing & making-up FOSV and standby to follow
instructions from HWOU Work Basket Operator.
HWOU HSE Officers (Safety Training Coordinator STC)
 The HSE Officer is responsible for identifying relevant environmental legislative requirements and ensuring site activities remain compliant through regular auditing on site.
 Facilitate the increase in the level of awareness and commitment to HSE issue s amongst staff
 Improve the quality and standard of contractor HSE management
 Monitor the implementa tion of the waste management system according to the corporate guidelines.
Tecon HWU Organizational charts with names and positions for delivering this contract
Printed copies are

uncontrolled
HWU contract Resources
The CEO of Tecon is respobxible and will ensure that adequate resources are produced for effevtive operation of the project in HSSE competency training, upgrade of
procedures and wprk process to comply with standards requied emergency response capability, audits review and follow up as well as an effective reward xyxtem
Hse Criticak Task & Competence Requirement

The competency requirement for these HSE critical tasks is in line with the minimum requirement of respective job competence profile found in tecon competemce pf
employment and competence assurance document. This ensures that only personnel who are competent with training, skill and exoerience requirement as clearly stated are
engaged for every critical position in the operation. The following is being implemented on continous basis
 Staff appraisal & development
 Job descriptiom written for all jobs and copies issued to indivjdual staff
 A good reward system put in place to enxourage hardwork and committement to HSE issues
Hse critical task
HSE Communnication
Communication of HSE issues between the workforce and the line management is done through QHSE meetings, Newsletters, posters, stickers, safety statistics Boards,
Annual HSE Plan and Programs, emergency alarm systems and signals videos, E-mails etc.
Some HSE communication meetings is as scheduled are as shown is the table below
Meeting Attendance Frequency Purpose Leader
Toolbox Meeting All crew members Daily Pre-job commencement hazard HWO
HWO/marine Crews analysis to ensure inherent hazards Operators/Captain
base Workshop are identified ad controls put in Work Shop Supervisors.
personnel place to ensure accident /incidents
do not occur.
Daily Operations Meeting All Department Daily Discuss daily operations, previous Managing Director
Head / controllers days performance and plans for the
new day. CASHES requirements
with respect to the days job etc
Printed copies are

uncontrolled
Departmental QHSE Meeting Departmental basis Monthly Review of CASHES performance for Department Head
(All members of each the month
department).
Crew CASHES meeting All crew members One per shift Forums for highlight of CASHES HWO Operators Captain
HWO Marine issues. Dissemination f ILSE /Supervisor
information and cross-fertilization
of ideas amongst individual crews.
Management/sub contractors All sub Bi-annual Review of HSE performance. Managing Director
contractors/Managem Ensure HSE standards and
CASHES
ent advertise improvement strategies
Communication
Forum
CASHES Committee members Quarterly To review CASHES performance for CEO

the Quarter. Map out new
COMMITTEE
strategies for implementation of
HSE Policies and procedure.
Meeting
TECON mgt is responsible for ensuring that all its equipment used during te HWU operation are tested and certified fit for purpose.
All equipment shall be subject to routine inspection and certification as required.me, “Use of mobile diesel equipment in hazardous area”, and equipment manufacrers specifications.
4.4 Risk Management

Who / what
Hazard / Recovery
Task steps Threats Top event Consequences may be Inh. Risk Barriers/Controls Action Party
Source harmed measures
Task description : Mobilise equipment to site
Printed copies are

uncontrolled
Who / what
Hazard / Recovery
1. Overloading above
truck tonnage
2. Bad
weather/reduced
visibility
C.1.1. No Overloading of
3. Slippery surface truck, equipment tonnage
Heavy 80% of deck capability
equipment 4. Manual handling
C.1.2. Used Certified trucking
Asset crews with good Behaviour &
5. Un-pre-mobbed
damage Attitude
equipment in use
Community C.2.2. Stop work during bad
unrest / 1.Truck break Injury, M weather/reduced
Loading 6. Improper securing Trucking
issues down
equipment on of load on truck Fatality crew,
P4D C3.1 Good house keeping
Rig Supervisor
Truck/ offloading Theft & 2.Truck hitting (traffic truck,
of equipment on Pilferage 7. Incompetent E3C and contracts,
Accident) Equipment C3.2 Use appropriate safety
other road A3C 1. All truck
trucks operators.
onboard Contractor
users shoe occupants wear
R2D Supv, Truck
Lifting / 8 Dropping objects. seat belts
3.Trip and fall C4.1 Use CERTIFIED crane to driver,
overhead lift heavy equipment. 2. First Aid Kit in
equipment 9. Unconsolidated each craft
land surface. 4. Strain
C.5&8.1. Use certified crane 3. Follow Tecon
for lifting heavy equipment ER Plans
10. Unauthorized 5.Loss of
personnel. C.6.1 Ensure that the load is 4. Flag men
equipment
correctly rigged and secured available at
control with the sling before lifting.
11. Interaction with recommended
Hostile community, C.7.1 Review competency of posts.
6. Drop load
Legacy community personnel.
issues
C.9.1. Consolidate land with
Duramats
C.10.1 Ensure proper access
control.
C.11.1 Ensure FTO is effective
and functional
Printed copies are
uncontrolled
Who / what
Hazard / Recovery
Rig Supervisor
C.1 Ensure that all the
and other
equipment on the deck is
Contractors
secured by heavy duty ropes.
Supv Truck
Unsecured loads on Captain,
Truck C.2 Assure no free lines or
hoses attached to the truck.
Loosed hoses/lines
attached to barge
Heavy C.4.1 Only essential
equipment Walkway personnel to be around
Wrong position of Drop equipment loading area.
Restricted personnel relative to
other equipments, Collision C4.2 Condon off hazardous R.1 1st Aider/
space
lines/hoses. Equipment area and station warning sign MEDEVAC
Asset capability to be
Lifting Uncontrolled Equipment on truck.
approach, non damage C.5.1 Ensure proper access strategically
Spotting of unavailable
observance of safety control positioned on site
equipment Equipment Personnel
warnings, negligence, Injury for quick response.
Failure lack of site visit,
Loss of on board C.6.1 Ensure effective PMS,
unavailable location containment R.2 ER plan in
map. C.6.2 Use Go-No-Go gauge place
Poor maintenance, and walk the line.
Hydrocarbon equipment mismatch,
under pressure incompetent operator, C.6.3 Review competency of
crane failure. operators.
Collision with Xmas
tree & flow lines. C.7.1 Condon off work area
Printed copies are

uncontrolled
Who / what
Hazard / Recovery
M C. 1. Implement the standing R1. All truck

instructions of no occupants to wear Rig
1. Overloaded truck. Loss of truck P4D Overloading of truck. live vests
Onboard C.2.1 Use SPDC Journey
Supervisor
control. crew, other E3C R2. Craft and other
2. Bad weather / Management
road users, A3C occupants swim Contractor
reduced visibility
equipment R2D C.3 Use SPDC pre-mobbed / certified Supv Truck
Vehicular
3. Road Obstructions. Accident and truck. fit for purpose truck.C.4 R3.First Aid Kit Captain,
Driving permit essential and in each craft
Driving to site
4. Third party should be mandatory for all R4. Follow SPDC
activities on the road. Equipment crew member to have.\C.5 ER Plans
falling Use Certified tucking crews Truck
5. Un-pre-mobbed (QM & MEA) with good Captain
Road transport
truck. Personnel / Behaviour & Attitude
third party C.6 Slow down when
6. Truck driver injury, approaching densely
error / fatality, populated area.
incompetence. Asset
damage. C.7 Apply Journey
7. Night driving Management & No night
driving policy.
8. Driver without
valid DDC. C.8 Ensure drivers with valid
DDC are used for the
operation
Printed copies are

uncontrolled
Who / what
Hazard / Recovery
Make up lines and High pressure 1. Use of wrong Flying pipe- Injury/fatali Personnel C.1.1 Use of 1502 connection 1. Adequate first Rig Supervisor
pressure test connections works ty C.1.2 Securing of pipe-works
aid Ambulance
Equipment for no movement 2. MEDEVAC Contractor
Leaks Equipment Supv
2. Improper C.1.3 Use of separate 3. Activate ECR
damage
isolation of walkway for pressure lines
valves and hoses,
C.1.4 Only certified
equipment to be used, all
3. Human error pressure lines to be properly
secured in the event of line
failure.
C.2.1 Hold pre-job talk on
release of pressure
C.2.2 Proper positioning of
personnel relative to line of
pressure release.
C.2.3 Properly isolate all
pressure sources before
installing or removing
gauges.
C.3.1 Competent WI
personnel to carryout task
Printed copies are

uncontrolled
Who / what
Hazard / Recovery
Use of hand 1. Using the wrong Strain, Harm to Injury Personnel Low 1. Follow established work R1 1st Aid by a Rig Supervisor
tools. tool for a job personnel carrying P1-D procedures/methods. trained 1st Aider
2. Worn out or out job. 1, 2 & 4. Check tools among crew. Contractor
defective tools inventory for R2. MEDEVAC Supv
3. Incompetence on quality/adequacy before
correct application mobilisation to worksite.
of the particular tool 3. Only competent
being used personnel to be deployed on
4. Non-availability job.
of required tools
Printed copies are

uncontrolled
Who / what
Hazard / Recovery
Hydro-carbon 1· Ignition sources - Fire and Major Personnel High C.1.1 Make available and use
at surface and from unsafe explosion Injury/Fatal carrying P4-D gas testers & stop work when
on cellar pit. cameras/ lighters ities, out the A3-C not safe to continue.
and use of hand tools
Environme various E2-C
etc. C.1.2 All potential sources of
ntal Impact activities R2-C
2. Metal to metal ignition - GSM, unsafe
on cameras not allowed on site.
contact. R1 1st Aid by a
Asset.
trained 1st Aider
3. Valve/Equipment C.2.1 Only use non-spark
among crew. Rig Supervisor,
failure· hand tools, and rubber apron,
hand gloves. Handle tools
R2. MEDEVAC
4. Human error· Contractor
firmly to avoid metal to metal
R3. Spill Supv,
contact.
Response Plan in
C.3.1 Proper isolation of place.
valves and pre-mobbed
equipment should be use. R4. Tested fire
fighting
C.4.1 Ensure Operators equipment on
competence / Competent site.
supervision.
C.4.2 Compliance with HAC

layout plan in terms of
equipment/operations.
Printed copies are

uncontrolled
Who / what
Hazard / Recovery
C.1.1 Use pre mobbed crane

Detailed plan for spotting
Use of un-pre- lifts and identifying routines
mobbed crane R1. Use
for awkward areas of rig up
appropriate PPEs
C.2.1 Use of certified crane – hard hat, safety
Crane Incorrect use of operator. shoes/boot
operations & crane
lifting of C.3.1 Good house keeping Wireline /
heavy loads. Fatality/dro C.4.1 Hazardous area Pumping /Rig
Slippery Dropped objects R2. All personnel
surface(oily) wning cordoned off with signs and Supervisor,
Working at swim certified
Rig up HWU, WL, Personnel barriers.
height
Slickline and C.5.1 Stable / strong Contractor
pumping Damaged rails Slipping / protected work platform
Injury Supv,
Equipments. tripping (having firm /strong floor & R3. First aider to
Equipment
Adverse guard rails), otherwise be onsite
Unstable platform Damaged
weather Man over board provide moveable gratings &
asset secure stabber with safety
conditions Negligence or R4. Wearing of
Dizziness Harness. C.6.1 Avoid standing certified work-
under suspended loads and
vest
observe breaks
Multiple signalling R5. MEDEVAC
during lifting C.7.1 Only qualified banks-
operation man to control all lifting
operations
Task description: Mixing of chemicals and taken returns
Printed copies are

uncontrolled
Who / what
Hazard / Recovery
Mixing of Spill
Loss of
chemicals and Personnel
containment
Cement Chemical spill
C.1&2.1 Use certified
1. Incompetence Burns competent operator R1. Contain spill Pumping
Assets C.3.1 Inspect tanks before with boom Operator/Rig
2. Human error. Corrosion mobilization
Supervisor
R2. Provide eye
C.4.1 Condon off the
3. Hole in tank wash / shower
hazardous area and restrict Contractor
movement to essential
4. Presence of R3 1st Aider Supv Barge
personnel.
unauthorised person among crew. Captain,
Dust inhalation
R4. Provide and
use Hand-gloves,
goggles and
coverall
R5. Use
neutralisers to
reduce corrosive
chemical as low as
reasonable
practicable
Activity: Running in hole and Pumping chemical
Printed copies are

uncontrolled
Who / what
Hazard / Recovery
RIH and pumping

for
circulation/treatm
ent
Printed copies are

uncontrolled
Who / what
Hazard / Recovery
Pumping
/Wireline
C.1.1. Ensure all guards are
Operator /Rig
in place and secure.
R1 1st Aid by a Supervisor
Personnel C.1.2 Barriers and warning
Moving parts Personnel trained 1st Aider
1. Unrestricted contact with Injury signs displayed, Contractor
of HWU unit access trapping among crew.
moving parts Supv
R2. MEDEVAC.
Wireline
R1 1st Aid by a Operator / Rig
Personnel
C.1.1 Pre-mob of CT Unit. trained 1st Aider SUpervisor
injury Crew
Implement preventive among crew.
Wireline under Wireline unit members
maintenance plan R2. MEDEVAC. Contractor
tension and hydraulic failure Parted coil Asset
Coiled Supv
high pressure damage
Operator error C.2.1 Only competent R3. Spill
tubing operator to operate CT Unit. Response Plan in
place
C.1.1 Ensure use of 2” 1502 R1. Erect safety Pumping

connection only barriers ensuring operator/Rig
all non-essential Supervisor
Injury
1. Wrong Personnel C.2.1 Tie down lines to be personnel are
Temporary
connection Pressure release fitted and secured clear of the Contractor Supv
pipe works Damage
Equipment working area(s).
2. Loose lines equipment C.2.2 Ensure area pressurised
has been proof tested to 1.5 R2.First aider on
times WP site
Printed copies are

uncontrolled
Who / what
Hazard / Recovery
Activity: Pull out of hole and transferring well returns to station
C.1.1 Increase hydraulic

pressure.
C.1.2 Change out stripper

rubber when required. R1 1st Aid by a
trained 1st Aider
Crew C1. 3 Make available and use among crew. CT operator
Hydrocarbon Pollution members gas tester at regular intervals
Pulling out of R2. MEDEVAC.
release through Loss of & stop work when not safe to CSR
hole CT 1. Weak stripper Injury
stripper containment Environme continue.
R3. Spill
nt C.1.4. All potential sources of
Response Plan in Crane Operator
ignition - GSM, unsafe
place
cameras not allowed on site.
C.1.5 Compliance with HAC

layout plan in terms of
equipment/operations.
Activity: Bleeding Off and rig down PCE
C.1.1 Inspect temporary Wireline

R1 1st Aid by a
pipelines before start of Operator /Rig
trained 1st Aider
job. Supervisor
Hydrocarbon among crew.
Bleeding down release
C.1.2 Ensure no loosed Contractor
1. Loosed temporary Fire/polluti Environme R.2.MEDEVAC
Lubricator and Spill connections. Supv
pipelines to flow- on nt
Coil tubing back tank R.3. Spill
C.1.3 Use 2” 1502
Response Plan in
connection ONLY
place
Printed copies are

uncontrolled
Who / what
Hazard / Recovery
C.1.1. Competent
Operators
Bleeding down N2 Noise above Loss of Injury to
Noise 1. Bleeding down
gas from CT too fast 85db hearing personnel
C.1.2 Enforce use of Ear
muff by all operators.
Crane
Rigging down operations & 1. Use of un-pre- Dropped Fatality/dro Personnel C.1.1. Use pre mobbed crane R1. Use CSR
lifting of heavy mobbed crane objects wning appropriate
C.1.2 Detailed plan for Rig Supervisor
loads. PPEs – hard hat,
spotting lifts and identifying
2. Incorrect use of Equipment safety
routines for awkward areas Crane Operator
Working at Slipping / Injury shoes/boot
crane of rig down
height tripping
HSE officer
Damaged C.2.1. Use of certified crane
3. Slippery Man over asset operator.
surface(oily) R2. All personnel
Adverse board swim certified
weather C.2.2. Regular inspection of
conditions slings
4. Damaged rails
C.3.1 Good house keeping R3. First aider to
Heaving of 5. Unstable platform
tides be onsite
6. Negligence or C.4.1 Hazardous area
Dizziness R4. Wearing of
cordoned off with signs and
certified work
barriers.
7. Multiple signalling vest
C.5.1 Stable / strong
during lifting protected work platform
operation R5. MEDEVAC
(having firm /strong floor &
guard rails), otherwise
provide moveable gratings &
secure stabber with safety
Printed copies are
uncontrolled
Who / what
Hazard / Recovery
Harness.
C.6.1 Avoid standing under
suspended loads and ensure
intermittent breaks
R.6 Use of
C.7.1 Only qualified banks-
adequate PPE-
man to control all lifting Hardhat
operations
HWU OPERATIONS - TUBING RECOVERY / RE-COMPLETION
C.1.1 Access restriction to

defined drop zone.
C.1.2 Awareness of Drop
hazard.
> Proper
C.1.3 Proper personnel
Dropped Personnel personnel
Dropped 1. Drift from landing Injury, positioning relative to defined Riggers
objects - drift, on deck. positioning
Pick-up Landing Object (drift joint. equipment Medium drop zone. Rig Supervisor
joint from landing pipe joint, lay Damaged relative to defined
2. Loosed pipe strap damage. C.2.1 Strapping to be done by
drop zone.
Client Rep
joint / pipe). down strap pipe joints. certified rigger.
> MER Capability
C.2.2 Use of certified straps.
C.2.3 Pre-use inspection of
straps.
C.3.4 Competent supervision
RIH & make-up Slip-Trip 1. Slippery surface Fall on same Injury Personnel Medium C.1.1 Immediate clean-up of > MER Capability HWU Site
of landing joint hazards 2. Poor house keeping level on work oil spills on work areas. > Proper Supervisor
platform C.1.2 Use of slip-resistant Housekeeping. Client Rep
safety shoes/workboats.
C.1.3 Equipment maintenance
to prevent oil leaks.
C.2.1 Good Housekeeping.
C.2.2 HSE Intervention culture
Printed copies are

uncontrolled
Who / what
Hazard / Recovery
for UA/UC.
C.2.3 Pre-start worksite
inspection by crew leads.
C.1.1 Loose hand tools lanyard

to user
C.1.2 Loose hand tools
> Covers for holes
maintained on user in a
Dropped Object Damaged Downhole on work floor. Rig Supervisor
Dropped 1. Loose hand tools Medium carrying bag.
in hole equipment equipment > HSE Intervention Client Rep
Object in hole C.1.3 Competent service
culture for UA/UCs
personnel.
C.1.4 Covers for holes on
work floor
C.1.1 Strict adherence to

Manual 1. Poor Lifting Physical strain 1.1 First Aid
manual handling procedure Rig Supervisor
handling of techniques. & stress, loss of Injury Personnel Medium 1.2 Medivac
C.2.1 Personnel to posses Client Rep
materials & 2. Ill health control Procedure
valid medical certificates.
Equipment
Pick-up string with Personnel

travelling slip 1. Poor handling / Injury, on deck. Rig Supervisor
> Proper
competence of equipment Damaged C.1.1 Certified equipment
personnel
String on personnel Dropped String damage. pipe joint, Medium C. 2.1 Training and Client Rep
positioning.
motion 2. Equipment integrity Fishing of completions supervision Jack / assistant
> MER Capability
(Hydraulic Failure) string string, other Operator
accessories.
Flammable 1. Loss of well control Fire / Explosion Explosion, > Personnel High C.1.1 Maintain Well Control > Ensure presence Rig Supervisor
hydrocarbon Fatality carrying out according to Workover of first aider & OH Client Rep
gas in 2. Ignition Sources
Asset task Program and full compliance nurse on site.
atmosphere. 3. Built up pressure in damage > Assets - with the DWPM. > Medevac
annulus Well, MVs. C.1.2 Gas detectors and capability.
alarms. > Fire fighting
C.1.3 Competent Personnel - capability on site.
IWCF/WIPC Certification for > Facility
Printed copies are

uncontrolled
Who / what
Hazard / Recovery
all critical technical personnel

(Supervisors, Rig Managers,
Drillers, etc).
C.2.1 Use only non-spark tools
for the job.
C.2.2 Ensure all sources of
ignition - GSM, unsafe
evacuation
cameras not allowed on site -
Procedure.
eliminated.
C.2.3 Maintain fire cover
through operation
C.3.1 Confirm effective

Pressure bleed off from wing
valves.
C.1.1 Certified equipment /

Pre-use Inspection and
Injury to > Proper
closeout of findings before
personnel, personnel Rig Supervisor
Objects under Guide line snap Personnel Medium operation.
1. Excess tensioning damage to positioning. Client Rep
tension C.1.2 Competent Operator.
string > MER Capability
C.1.3 Compliance with
Operating Procedures.
> MER Capability

Injury to
> Small spill clean-
personnel, Personnel, C.1.1 Certified equipment
Hydraulic oil 1. Pipe / hose integrity Loss of up. Rig Supervisor
damage to environmen Medium C.2.1 Periodic maintenance to
under Containment > Spill Client Rep
pressure 2. Abrasion environmen t prevent oil leaks.
Contingency Plan
t
arrangement.
Break-up and Manual 1. Poor Lifting Physical strain Injury Personnel Medium C.1.1 Strict adherence to > First Aid Rig Supervisor
laying down of handling of techniques. & stress, loss of manual handling procedure > Medivac Client Rep
hanger/ tubings materials & 2. Ill health control C.2.1 Personnel to posses Procedure
Equipment
Printed copies are

uncontrolled
Who / what
Hazard / Recovery
valid medical certificates.
Medium
Injury to Personnel,
Dropped personnel, Well
Dropped Objects damage to C.1.1 Loose hand tools lanyard
Object (hand Use of wrong / faulty equipment,
tools in hole, to user
tools injury to C.1.2 Loose hand tools
hanger/tubing
from height) 2. Lifting Equipment Well maintained on user in a
failure > Proper
carrying bag.
personnel
C.1.3 HSE Intervention culture
positioning
for UA/UCs
relative to defined
C.1.4 Covers for holes on work
drop zone. Rig Supervisor
floor.
> MER Capability. Client Rep
C.2.1 Certified lifting
> Covers for holes
equipment. / Pre-use
on work floor.
inspection program.
> HSE Intervention
C.2.2 Pre-star audit of rig-up &
culture for UA/UCs
all P1 actions from prestart
audits closed before start-up.
C.2.3 Competent service
personnel.
Overhead 1. Failed hydraulic Dropped Pipe / Injury to Injury to Medium C.1.1 Valid equipment > Proper Rig Supervisor
Printed copies are

uncontrolled
Who / what
Hazard / Recovery
tool
power pack personnel, personnel, personnel Client Rep
damage to damage of positioning
2. Poorly strapped pipe
equipment equipment equipment relative to defined
certification / Pre-use drop zone.
inspection program. > MER Capability.
C.1.2 Up-to-date maintenance > HSE Intervention
service record. culture for UA/Ucs
C.2.1 Competent Riggers /
Supervision and Competent
operators.
C.2.2 Procedures for carrying
out activity.
Lifting Operations
Lifting operations Lifted Load 1. Adverse Weather Equipment Dropped WI C.1.1 Use of Lifting Plan Personnel Rig Supervisor
Instability load. Personnel positioning away Client Rep Crane
Lifting
carrying out C.1.2 Fuctional lifting safety from potential Operator
equipment
activity / critical equipment on cranes / drop zones.
Asset lifting devices.
Restriction of
C.1.3 Procedure for lifting access to drop
operations in adverse weather zone.
conditions.
MER capability
Printed copies are

uncontrolled
Who / what
Hazard / Recovery
C.1.1 Follow work procedure.
C.2&4.1 Check tools inventory

for quality/adequacy b/4 R1.First Aid.
mobilization to site. Client Rep/
Use of hand
tools. C.3.1 Only competent HSE Officer/
personnel deployed on job. R2.
Rig Supervisor
C.5.1.Conduct gas test b/4 Medevac.
1.Strain
Dressing of Cutting 1. Using the wrong tool
Oxy-acetylene starting the job,& stop when
Knives and Make for the job. 1. Injury.
Up of BHA on gas. not safe.
Cutting String. R3. Tested
2. Defective tools. 2.Harm to C.5.2 Use PTW/HOT work to
Personnel firefighting
personnel. control the job as required.
3. Personnel 2.Occupatio carrying out equipment onsite.
Tungsten nal health
Carbide incompetence. 3.Burns the task. C.6.1 Use appropriate PPE as
illness.
required-impact hand gloves,
4. Unavailability of 4. eye protection, full face visor,
required tools. fire retardant coverall.
Explosion
5. Presence of C.6.2 Put fan behind the
explosive gases. welder to blow the particles
from tungsten carbide away
6. Inhaling the fumes from him.
from tungsten carbide
formation-a C.6.3 Compliance with HAC
radioactive substance. layout plan in terms of
operation equipment &
workshop.
Printed copies are

uncontrolled
Who / what
Hazard / Recovery
1. Uncertified C.1.1 Ensure equipment

equipment Premature certification and selection
2. Incompetent Fire,
discharge
personel, explosion, Personnel C.2.1 Ensure competent
3. Unauthorized injury to carrying out personnel for the operations Client Rep (C1, C2,
handling/ personnel/e the task. R1: First aid, R2: C3, R1, R3),
transportation of quipment,
Perforation explosives, C.3.1 Ensure competent Medivac, R3: Fire Slickline Supr (C1,
pollution, Casing may
4. poor work personnel and proper extinguishers at C2, C3, R4); First
fatality be
practices. supervision site, R4: Aider (R1, R2, R3 &
Explosive 5. Lack of observation perforated Appropriate PPE, R4)
of radio silence at the C.4&5.1 Adhere to job R5: ERP
wrong place procedures
Printed copies are

uncontrolled
Who / what
Hazard / Recovery
Pressure Injury to
discharge personnel Personnel C.1.1 Wash valve with hose
carrying keeping off from the line of Proper
Pull ball valve to Trapped Debris on top of valve. out the fire. positioning of Rig Supervisor
work window and pressure task. personnel, Client Rep
connect TIW C.2.1 Ensure key for TIW
valve Unable to pump valve valve is handy to close valve First aid,
open
C.3.1 Lower string below Medivac
surface and retrieve valve
with slickline
Unable to retrieve
valve with slick line C.3.2 Work string and allow
pressure to release gradually.
Allow for some time to
achieve th
4.5 HSE Planning & Procedures
Provide a list of any specific operational procedures that act as controls and recovery measures identified in “Risk Management” section above.
BELOW IS A List of operational procedures to be employd as control and recovery measures to identify Risk Mangement in this cotract are as follow:
 TECON LIST OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS

 TECON HSE POLICIES, PROCEDURES, STANDARDS, MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, ERP ETC
 TECON PREVIOUS INSPECTION/AUDIT REPORTS
 TECON FOLLOW-UP DOCUMENTATION TO THE ABOVE
 TECON INCIDENT REPORTS AND FOLLOW-UP
 TECON TRAINING RECORD AND STATUS
Printed copies are

uncontrolled
 TECON RELEVANT LOCAL REGULATIONS RELATING TO GEOPHYSICAL ACTIVITIES
 TECON ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
 TECON HSE MANUAL
 TECON HSE PLANDOCUMENT
 TECON HSE MS DOCUMENT
 TECON MANAGEMENT OF CHANGE PROCEDURE DOCUMENT
 SPDC/TECON PTW PROCEDURE DOCUMENT
 TECON EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PROCEDURE DOCUMENT
 TECON WELCOME BOOKLET
 TECON VARIOUS HSE STANDARD OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES EG WORK AT HIEGHT, LOTO, HOT WORK PROCEDURE DOC
 TECON HWU MAINTENANCE MANUAL
 TECON HWU OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES EG BOP INSTALLATION/TEST PROCEDURE
 SPDC Well Program and daily work instructions
 TECON HSE Handbook is freely distributed to every visitor. It summarizes the safety procedures in place o the Unit. In particular it includes a descriptions of the unit,
the steps to be followed in case of emergency and the basic rules of safety in place on any hydraulic workover and completion unit.
list of available Task Risk Assessment’s relevant for the scope of work to be done?
TASK RISK ASSESSMENT TECHNIQUE RELEVANT TO THIS OPERATION ARE
 LOCATION HAC DAIGRAM

 ASSIST & ASSURANCE COACHING
 TRIC / PRE JOB SAFETY TALK
 NOISE MAP
 PTW PROCEDURE
 HAZOP/HAZID
 JHA
Printed copies are
uncontrolled
 HEMP
 RISK MATRIX
Provide details of Shell procedures that you utilize in work planning and your role in the application of these – such as PtW.
THE SHELL PTW (OR MOC) PROCEDURE IN THE HWU OPERATION
The SHELL PTW system is used for all work that may adversely affect the safety of personnel, the environment or the HWU unit. It is used for activities that may
require some form of safe job analysis prior to work commencing. The PTW system is used where 2 or more individuals or groups need to coordinate the activities in
order to work safely or where there is transfer of work and responsibility from one group to another.
HSE COMMUNICATIONS Communications is an important part of having a well-trained, well-managed company. Everything in the HSE-MS has a communication
component. For example. Permit to work, Stop card system, Manuals & Procedures, Documents, Quality Management System, Contracts terms, Reports. Direct
Communication, Audit, Employee Contract, HSE Meetings, HSE Committee Meeting,Weekly HSE Meeting, Pre Job Meeting,Daily Supervisor and Client Meeting:
List of equipment for the job and their premob status were applicable
LIST OF EQUIPNE FOR THE HWO PROVSIN CONTRACT
S/ N EQUIOMENT ID /NO PRE MOB STATUS REMARK
How security will be managed via approved security plan for the project.
SECURITY PLAN
All Tecon business continuity is sensitive to the security of employees and assets. Within the framework of Tecon security plan, Tecon has a robust process for Security
management in its operations.
An annual security plan is developed and maintained throughout the year. Complimentary activity specific security plans are prepared to address realities that exist now
but were not anticipated in the masterplan.
Printed copies are

uncontrolled
SECURITY RISK EXPOSURE MATRIX
SN SECURITY R PROBABILIT I CONTROLS/MITIGATION MEASURES SOL POST REMARKS
THREAT L Y CONTROL
P A R
1 Violent Crime L  Armed GSA escort (Lead and chase) Green

 GSA base support
 Intelligence gathering
 Security awareness briefing
 Journey management Security
Communication
 GSA briefings
 Emergency response provision on standby
 Equipment change out procedure in place
2 Organized L  GSA lead and chase escort Green
crime
3 Militant L  GSA lead and chase escort Green

activism  Community issues being managed by Tecon
Rep
 GSA presence
4 Civil/ L  Tecon Rep intervention Green Tecon Rep. liaison and to
Community  MOU in place ensure early warning and
unrest intervention
5 Arm conflict L  GSA Presence Green
6 Theft of L  Securing of sensitive information Green

information  Adherence to IT policies
Printed copies are

uncontrolled
7 Terrorism L  GSA Presence Green
Security Emergency Contacts:
I. Phillips Elson – 08150551984

II. Austin Osifo – 08099189624
Provide details for Emergency Response during the work or flow process with emergency contact numbers as well as drill plans to test effectiveness of the Emergency Response procedure
EMERGENCY RESPONSE DURING THE WORK OR FLOW PROCESS WITH EMERGENCY CONTACT NUMBERS AS WELL AS DRILL PLANS
FIRE EMERGENCT INCIDENT
1. Raise alarm by shouting “fire and the location” thrice to alert others.
2. Activate the nearest fire alarm.
3. Contact the emergency response coordinator, THE BASE MANAGER (08033169758) or THE GROUP HSE MANAGER (0803212579)
4. Fight the fire with an extinguisher only if you are trained and if it is a small fire, else shut the door, and exit the building.
5. All personnel should close the door, leave the building and assemble at their respective muster area and wait until the emergency response team member announces that it is safe to re-enter.
6. The fire emergency response team will take control of the scene and initiate the following fire fighting procedures:-
i. Call external fire services for help;
ii. Disconnect utilities and equipment unless safety will be jeopardized
iii. Coordinate an orderly evacuation of all personnel to the muster area.
iv. Fight the fire with appropriate extinguisher using the PASS (Pull, Aim, Squeeze, and Sweep) method.
v. Perform an accurate head count of personnel and visitors at the muster area.
vi. Provide external fire station with the necessary information about the location.
vii. Call first aiders if injury is sustained and activate Medevac if required.
viii. Call the retainership company clinic ( Ponyx Hospitals Ltd. on 08120958409, 08131630959 )
ix. Prepare report and review the emergency response.
Printed copies are

uncontrolled
S/N FIRE STATIONS TELEPHONE NUMBER. RADIO FREQUENCY
1. Rivers State Fire Service 07031522199
2. Shell Fire Services 084-237210-25Ext. 133 and 22929 144.590
3. Elf Fire Service 084-236310-15Ext. 2253 and 2519 144.140
MEDICAL EMERGENCY PROCEDURE / INSTRUCTIONS
 Remain calm.
 Assess the scene for danger; first ensure your safety then that of the casualty.
 Put on suitable personal protective equipment before coming in contact with the victim.
 Assess casualty for verbal or tactile response.
 Call the company hospital / clinic.
 If he is breathing, place him in recovery position and wait for the ambulance.
 If casualty is unresponsive or unconscious. Place your hand near the victim’s breathing zone to check for respiration. Do not move the person’s head or neck in the process.
 Check the casualty’s airway and open it by tilting head back.
 Check for serious bleeding, shock, fractures, or dislocation.
 If casualty is not breathing commence cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) i.e. 30 chest compressions followed by 2 breaths.
 Immediately breathing is established place casualty in recovery position and monitor continuously.
 Keep the injured person calm and warm to conserve body temperature.
 Do not attempt to give any liquid or food to the casualty.
 As soon as the ambulance arrives, move (3 persons supporting the head, back and legs) casualty to the hospital for further assessment.
 Contact victim’s relation as soon as possible.
MEDICAL RETAINERSHIP HOSPITAL AT PORT HARCOURT AND WARRI
CLINIC ADDRESS CONTACT MEDICAL DIRECTOR
Ponyx Hospitals Limited. Plot 26 Presidential Estate GRA III. OPP 08120958409, 08131630959 Dr. & Dr. Mrs. Obi Pius Umeh
NDDC Head Quarters, Aba Rd. PH
No. 3 Tombra Close off Airport Road. Warri, 07031546777, 08112914441
Winners Clinic Delta State
Printed copies are
uncontrolled
CONTINGENCY PLAN FOR ENVIRONMENTAL INCIDENTS
Stop all work activities in vicinity. Secure all equipment.
Notify customer and confirm immediate response activities.
Work as directed to stabilize and control further damage to the environment.
Assist or stand by to assist in response activities until injured is transported.
Obtain statement of 2 witnesses if possible.
Complete the appropriate reporting forms.
Be prepared to be subjected to drug and alcohol screens as per federal regulations.
Conduct accident debriefing / safety meeting and document meeting on daily logs and safety meeting logs.
Bridging document for the Interface document of the Contractor and Shell Management systems during the project duration (ONLY FOR MODE 2 MEDIUM/HIGH RISK CONTRACTS)
BRIDGING DOCUMENT BETWEEN MARINE SERVICE PROVIDER SPDC & TECON SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR MARINE
OPERATION
4.6 Implementation, Monitoring and Reporting

How will you report each incident with a consequence (injury, product loss, asset damage) related to the contract?
Incident Notification, Investigation, Reporting and Review:
The objectives of an incident reporting, investigation and review system are:
• To investigate all hazardous and potentially hazardous incidents at a level, depth and speed appropriate to their seriousness.
• After determining root causes, to take appropriate action to prevent the recurrence of the incident or similar incidents.
• To communicate the findings of incident investigations, the conclusions reached and recommendations made to all appropriate personnel. This includes contractors and service
companies.
• To identify trends in a timely fashion and target areas of particular concern.
• To contribute a database to assist engineering design.
Printed copies are

uncontrolled
Incident Notification:
All incidents that occur on THE TECON HWU iare reportable and subjected to SPDC/TECON management control. Whenever an incident occurs, it shall be reported to the SPDC
DSV/HWU SUPV as soon as possible by the immediate worksite supervisor. SUCH incidents shall be notified on the Incident Notification Form to the TECON/SPDC Management
withi n 24 hours of the incident. If incident results in emergency situation, it must be first dealt with the THE RIGSITE Emergency Response Plan,
Fat
ality
0 Injury
Loss Time
0
Restricted Work Case
0
Medical Treatment Case
2
First Aid Case
2
Motor Vehicle Accident
2
Fire Incident
0
Near Miss
6
Safety Observations (STOP Cards)
11,172
.
2019 TECON GROUP INCIDENT TRIANGLE
Incident Reporting:
Incident Report provides a format for reporting vital information gathered during the incident investigation procedure, and the recommendations for the corrective and preventive
clear and concise way. The incident report shall be submitted with all the evidence such as photographs, witness statement and other relevant documents.
Incident Database:
the HWU Rig site shall update and maintain the incident database or tracker for their operations at TECON base.. the overall incident database shall be updated and maintained by the HS
at the base. This database shall be reviewed for statistical analysis in order to determine the areas of improvement.
How will you report, and close out unsafe situations and actions identified during work completion on the contract?
Printed copies are
uncontrolled
Unsafe situations are track our STOPCARDS and they are identified through Auditing during work completion in the following way
TECON recognises that a high proportion of accidents results from unsafe acts by individuals. The unsafe act indicates lack of training of the individual, improper work practice
procedures or improper implementation of the Management System. It is very important that TECON installation management are proactive to identify the unsafe act, conduct audit on
implement corrective actions on it
The aim of the unsafe act auditing are to:• Reduce the potential accidents • Improve communication and understanding of the work activity• Improve the cultural attitude towar
Reaffirm and approve the accepted standards of safet• Identify the need of training requirements to individuals• Identify the need of change in work procedures
How will you report each incident with a consequence (injury, product loss, asset damage) related
In this contract, Tecon shall employ a 100% incident reporting policy (as well as involving SPDC/TECON Mana
i r e s p e c t i v e o f t h e c o n s e q u e n c e r e l a t e d u s i n g t h e Incident Notification, Investigation, Reporting and Review approach .
How will you investigate each incident with a consequence, and will you allow Shell to be involved in the investigation especially
In this contract,, the level of the investigation is based on the incident's potential rather than the actual consequences
.The SPDC DSV/ HWU SUPV shall assign investigation team to investigate any incident with consequencce, All serious accidents
and potentially serious incidents shall be investigated and analysed, and lessons learned from those investigations shall
be communicated and corrective actions implemented.
The Investigation team shall include the SPDC DSV, HSE COACH, HWU SUPV, Line Supervisor, Safety Officer, All Investigations shall be
conducted as per TECON Incident Notification, Investigation, Reporting and Review Standards. An incident investigation shall follow logical
process starting with the evidence gathering in order to determine the Critical Factors, which in turn are used to establish the immediate and root
cause of the incident.
Once the root cause has been established, the immediate action plan shall be formed and put in place to reduce the possibility of reoccurrence to
as low as possible, Once all the root causes are identified and analysed, it is imperative that the corrective and preventive actions are identified
and an action plan is developed. The corrective and preventive actions should be specific, measurable, achievable, realistic and time bonded
Incident Review and Follow-Up:
Incident Review for all incident having high potential to cause a serious injury or fatality, shall be held for all TECON installations. The report of the review meeting shall
be submitted to the TECON management by the HWU SUPV.
Below is a typical incident invvestigated using the tecon tree why approach to proffer the root cause of the incident
;
5 Why Investigation
Printed copies are

uncontrolled
Team Members: ENO EKO, NWAKWO C. (GZS), EMMANUEL OSUNDU (AMB. Driver). Date:
Problem Statement/Critical Event: Ambulance suddenly had brake failure in an attempt to move IP to retainership clinic.
Estimated Total Business-Wide Cost:
Recommended Solution: There should be a weekly vehicle check on the ambulance with documented evidence.
Latent Issues: Observed no documented evidence to show weekly checks carried out on the ambulance.
Why Questions 3W2H Answers Evidence Solution
(with what, when, where, how, how much)
1. Why did the ambulance brakes suddenly fail Because the hydrualic hose for the brake system burst The brakes did not work Hydrualic hose should be replaced
2. Why Did the hydrualic hose burst Because the ABS system is fualty No documented eveidence Ensure daily checks and test run on the ambulance.
Maintanace schedule to be prepared for the

3. Why is the ABS system not functioning. Because it's suppose to be worked on. No maintance schedule for the Ambulance.
ambulance.
Because Management did not respond on time to request Maintanace department must respond promptly to
4. Why was the ABS system not worked on There was docummented evidence to show
made from the rig site. request from rig site to forstall this kind of incidents
5. Why did Management not respond promptly to the Management claimed it took a while to order the parts A maintanance store should be created for spares so
The ordered parts did not arrive early
request to repair the faulty ABS system with which to work on the faulty ABS system. response time will be reduced
A case of a Medical Treatment Case, HiPo incidents, a product release > 10 kg or important asset damage?
Adibawa kidnap incident investigation report below
Which proactive and reactive KPI’s will you track on the contract to demonstrate effective HSSE control and performance?
.
HSE Performance Monitoring
TECON HSE performance monitoring Indicators (others could be added as applicable)
HSSE KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR (Actual) Unit Of Measure

Target frequency of reporting
LEADING INDICATORS
Pre-Mob Of Equipment Per/ equip 100% Bi Annually
Printed copies are

uncontrolled
Critical Personnel Certification Per/ equip EVERY 2 YRS
HSSE Induction / Training All Personnel 100% Per project campaign
Attendance To HSSE Meetings All Personnel 100% WEEKLY
HSSE Audits And Inspections Per/Schedule 2 Bi Annually/
Management Field Inspections Per/Schedule 4 QUATERLY
Unsafe Acts And Conditions Reporting Contineuos 20/Day Daily
Near Miss Reporting Contineuos 20/Day Daily
Emergency Response Exercises / Drills Participation On The Rig Per/Schedule 100% Every 2weeks
Equipment Inspection And Certification Per/ equip 100% Per project campaign
Fitness To Work Tests For All Onshore/Offshore Based Personnel All Personnel 100% Yearly
LAGGING INDICATORS
Non Accidental Deaths Per project campaign 0 Yearly
Total Recordable Cases Per project campaign 0 Yearly
Total Recordable Case Frequency (TRCF) Per project campaign 0 Yearly
Lost Time Incidents Per project campaign 0 Yearly
Road Traffic Accident (RTA) Per project campaign 0 Yearly
Lost Time Incident Frequency (LTIF) Per project campaign 0 Yearly
Total Recordable Occupational Illness Per project campaign 0 Yearly
Total Recordable Occupational Illness Frequency (TROIF) Per project campaign 0 Yearly
High Risk Incidents Per project campaign 0 Yearly

Printed copies are
uncontrolled
Security Incidents Per project campaign 0 Yearly
Motor Vehicle Incidents Per project campaign 0 Yearly
Kilometer Driven Per project campaign 100% Yearly
4.7 Assurance (audits/inspections)

Provide an assurance plan for the contract to ensure that your critical controls/recovery measures identified above are functioning as expected. Gaps and
improvements identified to be managed through a remedial action list.
Competence Assurance:
During the execution of the work, TECON must monitor the continued competence of the Service Provider, Contractor or Supplier. This refers to any associated
training commitment undertaken.
Provide assurance feedback to the Shell Contract Holder on a quarterly basis
TRAINING RECORDS FOR DRIVERS DDC& OTHER COMPETENCY CERTIFICATIONS SHALL BE SHOWN TO SPDC CONTRACT OWNER ON QUATERLY BASIS
How will you assure effective “learning from incidents” towards all operational staff (including to sub-contractors) with as a minimum the “learning from incidents”
supplied by Shell or provided from other companies?
BY CASCADING SUCH INCIDENT & DISCUSING LEARNING FROM SUCH INCIDENT TO THE OPERATING STAFFS THROUGH HSE ALERTS AND OTHER SAFETY BULLETTINS
EG THE APALACHIA SINGLE POINT OF FAILURE WITH HWU OPERATION INCIDENT IN 2018 AT CANADA
How will you provide competence assurance around critical positions identified on the contract?
BY CLOSE Monitoring TO include a verification that the Service Provider complies with his management system that may include:
Competence and Close monitoring of the replacement of personnel.
Printed copies are

uncontrolled
Provision of the necessary induction courses.
Training of Service Provider personnel in job related activities and procedures.
Completion of all agreed-upon HSE training, including any specified statutory training requirements.
Availability of HSE documents, instructions and information leaflets.
4.8 Management review

How are you going to officially review your performance on the contract with Shell? For example, Business Performance Reviews (BPR) or Contract Management Plan
(CMP) reviews.
How often will this be and which elements will you review to drive continuous improvement in your HSSE performance?
Bi-annualy we intend orgamising a business performance review (BPR) of the project with SPDC
The forum at which the whole project management system is discussed with a view to:
 Improving the HSE Management system

 Making changes to achieve the site objectives.
 Ensuring that the system is still functional and capable of producing the desired results
 Setting new objectives and targets and subsequent MIPS to achieve ALARP with respect to operational impacts on the
environment.
TECON HSE MS REVIEW
MANAGEMENT REVIEW FORM

1. Commitment and Leadership
Management shall provide strong visible commitment, leadership and personal involvement in Health Safety and the Environment. Management shall make available the resources
necessary to achieve our HSE objectives.
1.1 Commitment
Score Guide Assessment Criteria Comments
Printed copies are

uncontrolled
LEVEL 4 Senior managers visibly involved in HSE
activities, initiatives and reviews. The
Division/site recognized importance of HSE is communicated in
business decisions. Employees actively
as a leader in the participate. Adequate resources provided
for achievement of HSE objectives
particular aspect of the
management system
LEVEL 3 Managers are fully aware of the high Senior managers are not visibly involved in HSE meetings.
priority areas for improvement and status
This particular aspect of the of action plans. Investment is HSE seen Resources are not generally available.
management system is being as good business sense. Resources
addressed systematically. generally available. Importance of HSE is properly communicated
Reaching the respective targets.
Employees actively participate.
Integration with other activities
initiated Write stop cards and encourage their subordinates to do so
Hold department safety meetings.
ED says, Include action points in the HSE meetings to be reviewed @ management meetings at the
end of the year.
the managers are fully involved
Resources are not generally available.
General knowledge says we in Tecon are in level 3
Printed copies are

uncontrolled
Diseminate the status of the action point to the managers for proper review
LEVEL 2 Management setting objectives and

structure in place. Very much a top-down
Performance and results approach. Resources limited to specific
inconsistent. System being HSE objectives.
implemented but generally at
minimum levels. Plan – Do –
Check - Act process understood
but not put into practice.
LEVEL 1 HSE given less than equal priority. S
Overall, performance is poor. een as incompatible to achieving

Awareness may be there, but the operations, production and other business
implementation of this particular objectives. HSE resources scarce.
aspect of the management system
is haphazard or not in evidence.
SCORE: 3
1.2 Leadership
LEVEL 4 Senior managers encourage a culture of belief,

motivation, individual responsibility and
Division/site recognized participation in HSE improvement. HSE culture
accepted throughout the organization.
Printed copies are

uncontrolled
as a leader in the Employees involved at all levels. Personal
involvement very visible.
management system
LEVEL 3 Managers and supervisors actively participate IN level 3

in HSE activities, set a good personal example
This particular aspect of the and jointly develop both HSE "result" and HSE as a culture should be looking, to move us to level 4.
management system is being "Activity" targets with employees and
addressed systematically. contractors. General acceptance of HSE Senior managers should be visibly involved in HSE culture.
Reaching the respective targets. culture.
ED says we haven’t achieving level four but not yet fully, somewhere at the bottom, but not yet
Integration with other activities Most employees involved in HSE issues. fully there, identify all the areas to be improved and work on them.
initiated
Mr. Jude says that Field persionnel for depts. Like Casing and HWO win awards on HSE and take
it as a culture but the environment has not allowed us to improve on t.
ED says that we are working on making our present environment properly laid out to properly
encourage the HSE culture.
LEVEL 2 Senior managers discuss and review progress

towards specific "results" and "activities" HSE
Performance and results targets, not active in development of
inconsistent. System being objectives. Employees not convinced that HSE
implemented but generally at is a core value but participated in process. HSE
minimum levels. Plan – Do – culture not widespread.
LEVEL 1 Management not visible in HSE process.

Leaders communicate HSE expectations but
Overall, performance is poor. do not use or refer to Safety Management
Awareness may be there, but the System. Poor HSE culture. Employees do not
implementation of this particular
Printed copies are

uncontrolled
aspect of the management system feel they are involved.
SCORE:3
Printed copies are

uncontrolled
Tecon Oil Services ©2017
2. Policies and Objectives
Develop and communicate policies demonstrating a commitment to HSE that is consistent with, and at least equal to other business aims. Supporting objectives shall be
defined, deployed and maintained at all organizational levels.
2.1 Policies
LEVEL 4 Policies clearly defined and
Division/site recognized implemented consistent with

corporate parent. Process in
as a leader in the
place to revise policies.
Work force fully aware of all
management system
policies.
LEVEL 3 Good awareness and sensible Work force should be properly inducted, on HSE policies on regular basis.
This particular aspect of the application of all policies. Department HSE meetings should he carried out to pass on the knowledge.
management system is being
addressed systematically. There should be controlled copies of the HSE MS containing the polies of HSE held by all managers and
Reaching the respective heads of departments, where once there are new polies the previous ones should be returned and the
targets. new copies distributed again.
Integration with other activities Inductions should be carried out, e.g. by clients
initiated
HSE guidelines should be pasted in various areas as can be seen in MFS office, or previously in
cooperate office. This should be placed at the new work shop after the completion.
Even though we have a good percentage of our staff as field enabled and the field staff get proper HSE
policy trainings meaning we are generally having a good percentage of staff working eith good policy
review
LEVEL 2 HSE policy explained at
Performance and results induction training. No clear

inconsistent. System being
implemented but generally at direction on other policies.
Check - Act process Generally only management
understood but not put into
aware of policies.
practice.
LEVEL 1 HSE policy posted but not
Overall, performance is poor. generally explained or

Awareness may be there, but
the implementation of this understood. HSE policy is
management system is the only one posted. Limited
haphazard or not in evidence.
awareness of policies.
SCORE: 3
2.2 Objectives
LEVEL 4 Senior managers, site and

individuals set challenging objectives
Division/site recognized for continuous improvement.
Performance objectives clearly
as a leader in the identified and communicated to all
concerned. Personnel at all levels
are assessed on achieving these
management system objectives.
LEVEL 3 Coordinated objectives set and Objectives not properly communicated.

reviewed quarterly. Objectives on
This particular aspect of the target. All employees and most other Mr T says if we are not on level 4 because of communication then we can’t be on target.
management system is being parties aware of objectives.
addressed systematically. Says that most managers are not aware of the objectives, so it is difficult to say we are on
Reaching the respective targets. target
Integration with other activities Mr Jude said that the managers are fully aware but the problem is that the rest of the staff are
initiated not aware.
Even though the staff don’t know the objectives, the managers. Who are their leaders are
aware and can lead to the target accordingly.
LEVEL 2 Objectives set. Not well coordinated

or reviewed regularly. Action plans
Performance and results not focused on objectives. Levels not
inconsistent. System being realistic. Patchy level of
implemented but generally at achievement. Incomplete
minimum levels. Plan – Do – communication of objectives to
Check - Act process understood interested parties.
LEVEL 1 Objectives not set for site and/or
individuals. Not seen as a priority or
Overall, performance is poor. tool. Objectives not adequately
Awareness may be there, but the communicated to employees
implementation of this particular involved or subcontractors.
aspect of the management
system is haphazard or not in
evidence.
SCORE: 3
3. Organisation, Resources, and Documentation
Define, document, and communicate the roles, responsibilities, and accountabilities to enable every individual to fulfil their role in improving Health, Safety and Environmental
performance.
3.1 Organisational Responsibilities
LEVEL 4 HSE responsibilities accepted and acted All managers should properly include job descriptions concerning HSE
upon by all line managers throughout
Division/site recognized every management level. Job descriptions HSE responsibilities are not written in the various job descriptions.
prepared, match actual responsibilities and
as a leader in the clearly communicated to all employees. We have a proper organogram.
Clear, practical and unambiguous structure
management system
LEVEL 3 General acceptance of HSE responsibility

at all management levels. Job descriptions
This particular aspect of the in place for most employees, and
management system is being employees are clear on their
addressed systematically. responsibilities. No gaps in responsibilities.
Reaching the respective targets. Structure well defined and coordinated with
Integration with other activities responsibilities

initiated
LEVEL 2 Senior line managers taking
Performance and results their technical responsibilities seriously

inconsistent. System being and some HSE responsibilities. Other
implemented but generally at managerial levels not totally committed to
minimum levels. Plan – Do – HSE. Some job descriptions defined.
Check - Act process understood Structure defined on paper but untried in
but not put into practice. practice. Several grey areas owing to lack
of detail
LEVEL 1 Management not taking personal

responsibility for HSE. Personnel working
Overall, performance is poor. as individuals and not as a coordinated
Awareness may be there, but the team. Job descriptions and
implementation of this particular interrelationships for function not in place.
aspect of the management HSE seen as a matter for the HSE
system is haphazard or not in personnel.
evidence.
SCORE: 4
3.2 Training and Competence
LEVEL 4 Competency requirements of all HSE

critical positions reviewed and up to
Division/site recognized date. Well-balanced, experienced staff
and labour with active training program.
as a leader in the Records used to effectively manage
training program. Training plans
rigorously implemented
management system
LEVEL 3 Majority of qualified staff/workers given We train staff e.g HUET, IWCF.
This particular aspect of the operational training. Training records in But we are not rigorously implementing trainings, that’s why we are not in 4.
management system is being place. All instructors qualified.
addressed systematically. WE don’t have annual training schedules as said by Mr. Gabriel.
Reaching the respective targets. Competencies understood for most
positions. Employees training plan up to
Integration with other activities date.
initiated
LEVEL 2 Recruitment criteria defined but not

followed. Some training given. Records
Performance and results poor. Some instructors formally
inconsistent. System being qualified. Competence requirements not
implemented but generally at well
Check - Act process understood understood. All employees have a
but not put into practice. training plan and records.
LEVEL 1 No recruitment criteria defined. No

active training schedule apart from
Overall, performance is poor. general
Awareness may be there, but the
implementation of this particular induction. Instructors not formally
aspect of the management qualified. Competence requirements
evidence. not defined for job positions. Not all
employees have a training plan and
records.
SCORE: 3
3.3 Sub Contractor Management
LEVEL 4 All major subcontractors pre-qualified

and audited. Contractor's
Division/site recognized management taking active interest in
HSE management system. Minor
as a leader in the contractors fully integrated into site
HSE management system and
involved in review process.
management system
LEVEL 3 All major sub contractor's pre- We don’t regularly audit vendors
qualified and some auditing. Only on-
This particular aspect of the site interest by contractor Vendors are not involved in our review process
management system is being management. All minor contractors
addressed systematically. integrated into site HSE
Reaching the respective targets. management system.

initiated
LEVEL 2 Few major subcontractors pre-

qualified. HSE requirements defined
Performance and results in bid request. Some auditing. Few
inconsistent. System being minor contractors integrated into site
implemented but generally at HSE management system.
LEVEL 1 No prequalification of major

subcontractors. HSE requirements
Overall, performance is poor. not detailed in bid request or
Awareness may be there, but the considered in selection. No system in
implementation of this particular place when minor contractors are
aspect of the management employed.
evidence.
SCORE: 3
3.4 Communication
LEVEL 4 HSE is given equal priority at all

meetings. All employees aware of
Division/site recognized key HSE information and
expectations. Good two way flow of
as a leader in the information and
particular aspect of the action through controlled series of

meetings. Documents considered
management system
live and useful, recommendations for
revisions submitted.
LEVEL 3 Regular pre-job and HSE meetings. Recommendations are not usually reviewed and submitted.
Active participation by all personnel
This particular aspect of the including subcontractors. Notice
management system is being boards current. Good awareness at
addressed systematically. all levels. All documents available
and consulted on occasion as
initiated required by line managers.
LEVEL 2 Internal and external

communications haphazard. Some
Performance and results pre-job meetings held; no flow of
inconsistent. System being information up and down chain of
implemented but generally at command. Spread of signs and
minimum levels. Plan – Do – posters. Documentation available but
Check - Act process understood not up to date. Limited awareness.
but not put into practice. Use negligible.
LEVEL 1 Some structured meetings held.
Documentation not complete and not
Overall, performance is poor. easily available. No procedures for
implementation of this particular handling communications to
aspect of the management employees, subcontractors or
system is haphazard or not in stakeholders. . No posting of HS&E
evidence. information. Language issues.
SCORE: 3
3.5 Documents and Standards
LEVEL 4 HSEMS documents are controlled and On Target.

maintained and subject to continuous
Division/site recognized improvement. Versions are available Versions are in place. That is Version 0 & 1.
where they are needed. Regulatory,
as a leader in the company and client procedures and
standards adhered to.
management system
LEVEL 3 HSEMS documents are substantially
This particular aspect of the complete. Process in place to monitor

management system is being compliance. Compliance with most
addressed systematically.
Reaching the respective targets. standards to an acceptable degree.
Positive approach to improving
Integration with other activities standards. General awareness of
initiated company standards. HS&E
requirements systematically included
in specs for critical equipment

LEVEL 2 Awareness of company and operating
procedures and standards limited to
Performance and results managers only. Current versions not
implemented but generally at always available. HS&E requirements
minimum levels. Plan – Do – included in specifications for HS&E
but not put into practice. critical equipment/products
LEVEL 1 Poor awareness of internal standards at

lower levels. Poor knowledge of legal or
Overall, performance is poor. client standards except at
implementation of this particular high level. Versions not readily available
aspect of the management or not current. HSE requirements not
system is haphazard or not in included in specifications for critical
evidence. equipment.
SCORE: 4
4. Risk Evaluation and Management
To continually evaluate the HS&E risks to the workforce, customers and the environment. Continuously evaluate processes and activities for hazards, assess potentials, record
and control the subsequent risk to a tolerable level.
4.1 Identification of Hazards and Effects
LEVEL 4 All HSE definitions known and

well understood at all levels.
Division/site recognized
A process exists for updating
as a leader in the
the hazards and effects
particular aspect of the inventory due to changes to the
operation or learning’s from
management system inspections or incident analysis.
Appropriate
personnel at all levels involved
in the process.
LEVEL 3 Basic HSE definitions known

and understood at all levels.
This particular aspect of the Appropriate techniques used on
management system is being all operations. A comprehensive
addressed systematically. inventory of HSE hazards and
Reaching the respective targets. effects has been documented
for
initiated all units in the company.
LEVEL 2 Basic HSE definitions known All departmental units should have hazard register.
and understood by
Performance and results management.
implemented but generally at Techniques for hazards and
minimum levels. Plan – Do – effects identification are
Check - Act process understood documented but mostly a top
but not put into practice. down process.
LEVEL 1 Basic HSE definitions hardly

known. Techniques for hazard
Overall, performance is poor.
Awareness may be there, but the and effects identification not
aspect of the management documented.
evidence.
SCORE: 2
4.2 Risk Evaluation
LEVEL 4 Evaluation techniques used to
Division/site recognized assess the risk (likelihood and
as a leader in the consequence) with each
particular aspect of the hazard and effect associated
management system for people, the environment and

assets. Assessments kept up to
date and modified when
circumstances change (projects,
acquisitions, major modifications).
LEVEL 3 Assessments compiled and No hazard register. All departments should have hazard registers.
This particular aspect of the reviewed by involved persons in

management system is being bottom-up approach. All major
addressed systematically. hazards identified. Risk or
Reaching the respective targets. significance of these have been
classified using the risk matrix or
Integration with other activities equivalent.
initiated
LEVEL 2 Standard techniques known.
Performance and results Not all major risks evaluated.

implemented but generally at Mostly top-down process.
LEVEL 1 Haphazard assessment of risk
Overall, performance is poor. mostly in reactive mode. No

implementation of this particular systematic assessment of risk.
evidence.
SCORE: 3
4.3 Recording of Hazards and Effects
LEVEL 4 Results of evaluation recorded together

with data sources and assumptions
Division/site recognized used. Records used by operations
personnel to develop procedures and
as a leader in the work instructions. Hazard records
reviewed by involved personnel as a
hazard communication tool. Statutory
management system requirements and codes applicable to
HSE are documented.
LEVEL 3 Records compiled and used by involved

personnel at all levels. Major hazards
This particular aspect of the and risks recorded.
addressed systematically. Reaching Identified to be in level 3, we don’t inspect and color code unless the tool is mobilized to
the respective targets. Integration the location.
with other activities initiated.
LEVEL 2 Structure defined and some data

captured. Not recognized and
Performance and results consistently used in the organization.
minimum levels. Plan – Do – Check -
Act process understood but not put
into practice.
LEVEL 1 Poor knowledge of regulatory

requirements. No structured process for
recording.
aspect of the management system is
haphazard or not in evidence.
SCORE: 3
4.4 Risk Reduction Measures - Recovery
LEVEL 4 Integral part of operation. Risk

associated with all relevant hazards
Division/site recognized minimized through systematic
application of effective prevention and
as a leader in the mitigation measures. All personal
protective equipment (PPE) issues
addressed, work instructions and rules
management system
clearly defined and always respected.
Permit To Work (PTW) applied
systematically and effectively. Control
and mitigation improved as the result
of drills and experience from within and
outside the company.
LEVEL 3 Risk associated with major hazards All personnel are not well equipped with their personal protective equipment. PPE issues
should be addressed
This particular aspect of the minimized through proactive
management system is being application of prevention and mitigation
addressed systematically. measures that meet local
Reaching the respective targets. requirements. Requirements
understood by all. PPE rules clearly
Integration with other activities defined with few violations PTW in
initiated place for critical operations. Personnel
familiar with their roles in control and
recovery procedures.
LEVEL 2 Generic prevention and mitigation
Performance and results measures applied for major risks.

inconsistent. System being Controlled supply of PPE, some
implemented but generally at unsuitable for conditions. Some
minimum levels. Plan – Do – training given. Broad respect for PPE
Check - Act process understood rules. PTW system known: application
but not put into practice. inconsistent. Procedures exist for drills
but few exercises conducted.
LEVEL 1 Haphazard application of generic
Overall, performance is poor. prevention and mitigation measures.

implementation of this particular Nominal supply of Personal Protective
aspect of the management Equipment (PPE) with no formal
system is haphazard or not in assessment of requirements and little
evidence. follow-up on compliance. Permit To
Work (PTW) system not known or
used. Drills sporadic, incomplete
records.
SCORE: 3
Planning
HSE considerations shall be integral to all aspects of business planning or changes in the design, development, and delivery of our products and services.
5.1 HSE Planning

LEVEL 4 Plans in place to address all assessed On Target.
health, safety, environmental and security
Division/site recognized risks. HSE plans written, communicated as
appropriate and reviewed on a regular
as a leader in the basis. HSE requirements systematically
included in early stage of operational
plans. Targets are published annually
management system
LEVEL 3 Most health, safety, environment and

security issues addressed in plans.
This particular aspect of the
management system is being Most employees aware of appropriate
addressed systematically. Reaching plans. HSE requirements systematically
the respective targets. included in most operational plans.
Effective and
initiated systematic pre-job meetings
LEVEL 2 Some plans developed. Mostly copied

from previous versions and not adapted to
Performance and results new conditions. Little information
inconsistent. System being communicated outside
minimum levels. Plan – Do – Check management or HSE function. Pre-job
- Act process understood but not put meetings routine. HSE requirement
into practice. occasionally included in operational plans,
usually as afterthought.
LEVEL 1 No plans developed for health safety,

environmental security issues. HSE
Overall, performance is poor. requirements not included in operational
Awareness may be there, but the plans. No performance targets. Pre-job
implementation of this particular meetings driven by external demand.
aspect of the management system
SCORE: 4
5.2 Asset Integrity
LEVEL 4 All HSE issues related to facilities

and equipment clearly identified,
Division/site recognized understood and communicated to
as a leader in the concerned parties. Modifications to

equipment controlled. Effective
particular aspect of the bottom up process in place to
upgrade design and maintenance
management system
programs.
LEVEL 3 Effective maintenance programs in

place, focused on HSE-critical
This particular aspect of the requirements. HSE integral part of
management system is being facility and equipment or
addressed systematically. development. Facilities, equipment Management of change should be properly looked into it, and reviewed.
and products fit for purpose and MOC not properly effected.
Integration with other activities comply with their design
initiated
specifications
LEVEL 2 Maintenance program defined, not

fully implemented. Not all
Performance and results
inconsistent. System being equipment and products
minimum levels. Plan – Do – comply with specifications
LEVEL 1 HSE issues not fully evaluated
Overall, performance is poor. or addressed at design or

Awareness may be there, but the purchasing stage. No proactive
implementation of this particular maintenance program in place.
aspect of the management Equipment routinely used with HSE
system is haphazard or not in deficiencies.
evidence.
SCORE: 3
5.3 Procedures and Work Instructions
LEVEL 4 All critical activities identified, documented On Target.

and reviewed to assess HSE implications.
Division/site recognized Full understanding of potential impact of Controls should rather be put in place to hammer in on all simultaneous operations.
simultaneous operations and controls in
as a leader in the place. All operations conducted to reduce There should always be a HSE personnel on ground for every operation and every
risks at all times. HSE risks clearly department.
communicated to all staff involved in
management system operation. Operations personnel initiate
document modifications
LEVEL 3 HSE implications of most critical processes

understood and controlled. Work practices
This particular aspect of the consider most HSE risks. Good
management system is being communication of HSE risks to staff.
addressed systematically. Simultaneous operations understood and
Reaching the respective targets. some controls in place. Defined process
exists for development and review of
Integration with other activities standards.
initiated
LEVEL 2 Critical processed requiring written

procedures not well understood. Work
Performance and results practices not well aligned with operational risk
inconsistent. System being reduction. Local procedures not documented
implemented but generally at or updated. Not all staff aware of HSE issues.
minimum levels. Plan – Do – Little understanding of impact of simultaneous
Check - Act process understood processes and few controls in place.
LEVEL 1 Critical activities requiring written procedures

not identified or understood. Some
Overall, performance is poor. procedures/instructions exist and are known
Awareness may be there, but the to supervisors. Inconsistently used and
implementation of this particular enforced. Documents written by HSE
aspect of the management personnel with no employee input.
evidence.
SCORE: 4
5.4 Management of Change
LEVEL 4 Analysis and documentation of HSE

impacts due to changes in legislation,
Division/site recognized personnel, equipment, process,
procedures or acquisitions are an integral
as a leader in the part of all change control procedures.
Analysis and documentation completed for
both implementing the change and the
management system impact of the implemented change.
Amendments made to HSEMS so that
these changes do not prejudice HSE
performance.
LEVEL 3 Change control procedures exist No practice of the implementation of change and amendments made to HSEMS.
documenting evaluation, approval and the
This particular aspect of the responsibilities and competencies of those
management system is being involved.

initiated
LEVEL 2 There is a change control procedure but its

scope is not clearly described and its
Performance and results application is not consistent
LEVEL 1 Changes to approved plans (cost, time,
resources) are approved one level up and
Overall, performance is poor. only formally documented and approved
Awareness may be there, but the when required by financial controls.
evidence.
SCORE: 3
5.5 Emergency Response
LEVEL 4 All Emergency Response Plans

(ERPs) in place. Drills held and
Division/site recognized plans tested on regular basis.
Improvements are incorporated
as a leader in the and checked. Minutes available
particular aspect of the From debriefings.
management system
LEVEL 3 All ERP,s in place including
This particular aspect of the Spill contingency. Not regularly

management system is being drilled or tested. Roles
addressed systematically. understood by responsible MOC and HSE plans for the year should be properly distributed.
Reaching the respective targets. persons.

initiated
LEVEL 2 Some ERPs in place.

Regulatory emergency response
Performance and results requirements are met. Medevac
inconsistent. System being access tested.
LEVEL 1 Only Medevac in place.

Overall, performance is poor. Emergency Response Plans
implementation of this particular (ERPs) only explained in
aspect of the management briefings and courses, not
evidence. tested or drilled.
SCORE: 3
6. Implementation, Recording and Monitoring
Do what you said you would do, determine and record whether those actions are effective. Activities shall be conducted in accordance with defined standards, and continuous
improvement shall be promoted and monitored through active employee participation.
6.1 Inspections
LEVEL 4 Continual development and
Division/site recognized revision of checklists and
as a leader in the schedule to meet changing

requirements. Importance of
inspections highly accepted at
management system all levels of management.
Effective schedule targeted at
critical areas.
LEVEL 3 Full complement of custom Requires management acceptance and funding.

checklists with published
This particular aspect of the inspection schedule. Cross
addressed systematically. department inspections.
Reaching the respective targets. Significant deficiencies handled
by action plan tracked to
Integration with other activities closure. Significant level of
initiated compliance.
LEVEL 2 Broad spread of inspections.
Performance and results Mainly internal. Follow-up on

implemented but generally at immediate remedial action
Check - Act process understood only.
LEVEL 1 Some inspections conducted
Overall, performance is poor. with no structure. No follow-up.

Awareness may be there, but the Many deficiencies.
evidence.
SCORE: 3
6.2 Records
LEVEL 4 Records for HSE measurements
Division/site recognized are available on locations and

trends are openly discussed as
as a leader in the part of the improvement On target.
process.
Proactive approach to simplify
management system records as much as possible.
LEVEL 3 Systematic collection of data

with few minor omissions. Some
This particular aspect of the review of data to check trends
management system is being and create useful statistics.

initiated
LEVEL 2 Some collection of data with

major omissions. Difficult
inconsistent. System being to access and no analysis
minimum levels. Plan – Do – conducted.
LEVEL 1 Monitoring system for HSE
Overall, performance is poor. performance not fully

implementation of this particular described and driven by
aspect of the management legislation. Poor and incomplete
system is haphazard or not in records kept.
evidence.
SCORE: 4
6.3 Performance and Monitoring
LEVEL 4 Numerical performance indicators and target

are used to measure the implementation of
Division/site recognized as a the elements and expectations of the
leader in the HSEMS. HSE performance frequently
reviewed internally and results fed back to
particular aspect of the work force and used as input to continuous
improvement process. HSEMS
management system
implementation included in employee
appraisal.
LEVEL 3 Good presentation of data In an accumulative Appraisals are not implemented on from the HR stand point
and comparative way, allowing analysis of
This particular aspect of the trends and concerns. Some data based on
management system is being perception. Data analysis is input into HSE
addressed systematically. objectives and work plans.

initiated
LEVEL 2 Reactive performance measurements are

collected but not for HSEMS activities. No
Performance and results analysis of results. Locations have completed
inconsistent. System being their first review assessment of their HSEMS.
LEVEL 1 Health Safety and Environmental

Overall, performance is poor. Management System (HSEMS) being
implementation of this particular implemented but measurements
system is haphazard or not in that show that activities are being performed
evidence. satisfactorily are not yet available.
SCORE: 3
6.4 Non-complaince and Corrective Action
LEVEL 4 Employees anticipate any potential

need to deviate from standards and
Division/site recognized procedures allowing sufficient time to On target.
consider alternatives.
as a leader in the
Appropriate authorizations
are obtained for the variance
management system
LEVEL 3 There is a documented system for

control of HSE critical procedures and
This particular aspect of the standards known by those
addressed systematically. responsible for following those
Reaching the respective targets. procedures or standards. Records of
variances and correct actions exist.
initiated
LEVEL 2 Few instances of non-compliance are

recorded and the
inconsistent. System being procedure for approving
minimum levels. Plan – Do – variance is poorly defined or
Check - Act process understood impractical. Few revisions to
procedures and standards to prevent
recurrence
LEVEL 1 Procedures describing what must be
done in the event on non-compliance
Overall, performance is poor. with procedures, standards or
Awareness may be there, but the legislation are known but not
implementation of this particular documented.
evidence.
SCORE: 4
6.5 Incident Reporting and Follow Up
LEVEL 4 Line management actively leads at all On target. Openness by line managers should be encouraged and all incidents properly
levels incident reporting, investigation reported. Database to be improved upon.
Division/site recognized and review. All reports entered in
database. Alerts issued.
as a leader in the Accountabilities assigned and tracked
to closure. Employees suggest
improvements to the process.
management system
LEVEL 3 Reporting and investigation process is

well understood and applied to high
This particular aspect of the potential near misses. Supervisors
management system is being trained in and direct incident
addressed systematically. investigations. Employee involvement.
Reaching the respective targets. Lessons are disseminated.

initiated
LEVEL 2 Procedures for reporting and

investigating incidents. HSE personnel
Performance and results and supervisors undertake
inconsistent. System being investigations but limited employee
implemented but generally at involvement. Causal analysis
minimum levels. Plan – Do – incomplete. Near hit reporting poor. A
Check - Act process understood process is documented for
but not put into practice. recommendation tracking but many are
outstanding
LEVEL 1 Only major incidents are reported and
investigated. HSE personnel only
Overall, performance is poor. conduct investigations. No line
implementation of this particular management involvement. Findings
aspect of the management disseminated poorly, mostly local, no
system is haphazard or not in remedial action tracking.
evidence.
SCORE: 4
7. Audit and Review (Assessment and Continuous Improvement)
Is the Management System achieving results and fulfilling policy intent? Audits and reviews shall be conducted to verify the implementation and effectiveness of the HS&E
Management System.
7.1 Audits
LEVEL 4 Annual audit process fully

implemented. Significant points acted
Division/site recognized upon on a regular basis. Obvious On target.
improvement brought about by audit
as a leader in the process. Management, supervisors
and HSE personnel fully involved in
process.
management system
LEVEL 3 Audit process is defines and

implemented. Managers and
This particular aspect of the Supervisors take ownership of the
management system is being audit process. Recommendations drive
addressed systematically. action plan. Audit recommendations
Reaching the respective targets. are documented and tracked to closure
within allocated time frame.
initiated
LEVEL 2 Audit conducted. Audit tracking system

not functioning effectively.
Performance and results Recommendations not followed up.
LEVEL 1 No formal management system audit

conducted in last year. HSE personnel
Awareness may be there, but the conduct audits focusing on hardware
implementation of this particular and housekeeping.
evidence.
SCORE: 4
7.2 Reviews
LEVEL 4 Senior management review the On Target.

effectiveness of the Safety
Division/site recognized Management System following a
defined process and implement the
as a leader in the
conclusions. There is impact on
particular aspect of the corporate systems and procedures
based on risk exposure,
management system
stakeholders and the business
environment.
LEVEL 3 There is a defined process for
This particular aspect of the formal and regular review of the

management system is being Safety Management System
addressed systematically. effectiveness and HS&E
Reaching the respective targets. performance

initiated
LEVEL 2 Reviews conducted in response to

external pressure. Senior
Performance and results management initiates HSEMS
inconsistent. System being modifications due to incidents or
implemented but generally at failure to meet regulatory
minimum levels. Plan – Do – requirements.
LEVEL 1 No scheduled formal reviews taking
place.
evidence.
SCORE: 4
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
4.9 Remedial Actions Tracking
List any remedial actions open from the ‘Contractor Capability Assessment process’ and closure plan
THE REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN:
Introduction
This section ocontains the Remedial Action Plan (RAP) for the TECON’s operations . The table below lists the shortfalls and areas of improvement in the hazards
and effect management identified within the Case.
It is the responsibility of the HSE PLANcustodian to ensure that these are satisfactorily completed on schedule
LOCATION SHORTFALL ACTION PRIORITY RESPONSIBILITY TARGET STATUS

Work Site
Scaffolding around the Scaffolding Sys. Aug 2008
1. Hydraulic Unit Must be strong & High Tecon Rig Supv./HSE Closed
safe (rig up ops) Officer
Communication between Hand Radio to be Dec 2008
2. basket and crew Rig flow brought High Tecon Operations Mgr.
Alarm system for emergency Work in progress
situation on the trop tank & (Electrical Alarm High Electrician and QHSE Oct. 2008
3. Komey Unit Sys to be installed)
Warning signs around the Various warning
4. work areas on site signs to be High QHSE Officer Oct. 2008 Closed
installed
Fire Extinguishes to be DCP and CO2 Mulit
5. located on site purpose Fire High QHSE Officer Nov. 2008 Closed
Extinguishers to be
P a g e | 100
bought
Escape system from height up Work in progress
6. on the work basket High Tecon Rig Supv. Nov. 2008 Closed
7. Noise Map of HWU Plans are ongoing Medium Tecon /Snubbing Manager Oct 2019
8 Guying pattern, line, action In place Medium Tecon OPERATIOS June 2019 Closed
points to be provided for the Manager
HEU
9. Tool boxes to be provided for In place Medium Same as above Aug 2019 Closed
each department of the unit
10. Handling equipment for tubular In place High Same as above June 2019 Closed
such as elevators, slips, tongs
etc
11. N.P. Hoses to be well secured Case to secure
in a cage Hoses properly need High Tecon Supv. Nov. 2019
to be made
12. Ladder need to be made The lower ladder
adjustable to height of rig floor need to be adjust Medium Tecon Supv. Sept. 2019 Closed
13. Public address systems for the
work site On order Medium Tecon/safety officer July 2019
14. Drive Right to be installed in all
vehicles On order Medium Same as above July 2019
15. Fire Fighting system shall b e
installed In place High Same as above June 2019 Closed
16. Journey Management to be in
place In place Safety Officer June 2019 Closed
17. Medical equipment to be on
site, i.e stretcher & First Aid In place Tecon / Medic June 2019 Closed
drugs
HSE
18. Tecon Lifting and transport

baskets compliance with current In place High Tecon/Safety Officer June 2019 Closed
certificates
19. Tecon Drivers to undergo DDC Plans are underway Dec 2019
High Tecon/Safety Officer
20. Premob of Crane to be done for
the capacity type and Carried out already High Tecon/Snubbing Nov 2019 Closed
certification Manager
21. Warning signs to be in place
while pressure testing In place Medium Safety officer Oct 2019 Closed
equipments
22. Safety valve to be in the open
position in the basket In place High Tecon/Manager June 2019 Closed
P a g e | 101
23. Well control manual to be in Plans are underway Same as above
place High July 2019 Closed
List any remedial actions open from assurance activities, management reviews or incidents
5. Appendices
5.1 Retainership/HMO agreement
5.2 Other attachments
APPENDIX 1: TECON GROUP TRAINING PLAN (2017 - 2021)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC
BASIC FIRST
HSE-MS/ FRKLIFT/CRANE
DDC AID & FIRE IWCF DDC
GENERAL HSE OPTR
2017 FIGHTING
MGT OF ISO 14001

IADC
RIGGING &
PERMIT TO F0RKLIFT/CRA
LIFTING, IADC BASIC FIRST AID
PERMIT TO WORK, NE BASIC
BANKSMAN/ HUET
WORK ISO OPERATION/ FIRST AID
HSE FOCAL SLINGER
DDC BANKSMAN/SL
POINT 9001:201 INCIDENT INVESTIGATION
5 INGER
2018 TRAINING
P a g e | 102
FORKLIFT
OHSAS 18001 FIRST STOP, IWCF (WELL CONTROL
IWCF (WELL DEFENSIVE IWCF (WELL &CRANE
LEAD FORKLIFT AID,FIRE JHA,MAN PROG.), BASIC OFFSHORE
CONTROL INCIDENT DRIVING CONTROL OPTN,
AUDITOR, /CRANE OPTR FIGHTING,JO UAL SAFETY IND.& EMER.
PROG.) INVESTIGATI COURSE (DDC) PROG.) JOURNEY
HUET URNEY MGT LIFTING TRAINING
2019 ON MGT.
MGT OF
RIGGING & IADC
MGT OF HEMP/ RISK IADC ,
LIFTING, AGT, BKSMAN/SL, DROPS, LINE BASIC JOURNEY
PTW RIGGING & STOP, MOC ASSESSMENT, JOURNEY BASIC FIRST AID
CSE CRANE, FLIFT OF FIRE FIRST AID MGT.
LIFTING HUET MGT
OP
2020
MANUAL DEFENSIVE DEFENSIVE FIRST HSE-MS/

PERMIT
IWCF LIFTING, RISK DRIVING DRIVING AID,FIRE GENERAL
TO WORK
ASSESMT COURSE (DDC) COURSE (DDC) FIGHTING HSE
2021
KEY
Completed
Prospective
Missed Additional trainings may be conducted on clients request, employment basis or other specific requirements.
APPENDIX 2: 2020 TECON DEPARTMENTAL & GENERAL HSE MEETING SCHEDULE

1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
JANUARY
FEBRUARY
MARCH
APRIL
MAY
JUNE
P a g e | 103
JULY
AUGUST
SEPTEMBER
OCTOBER
NOVEMBER
DECEMBER
KEY:
General HSE Meeting
Appendix 3: 2020 TECON GROUP BASE EMERGENCY RESPONSE DRILL PLAN
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
JANUARY
FEBRUARY
MARCH
APRIL
MAY
JUNE
JULY
P a g e | 104
AUGUST
SEPTEMBER
OCTOBER
NOVEMBER
DECEMBER
Key
Fire Drill
Medevac Drill
Security/Community Invasion Drill
KICK Drill
APPENDIX 4a: HSE INTERNAL AUDIT PROGRAM FOR YEAR 2020
Audit Team: All HSE Lead Auditors and Management Staff.
APPENDIX 4b: HSE INTERNAL AUDIT PROGRAM FOR THE YEAR 2020
P a g e | 105
Four- Month/Year Auditee (Department/Rig) Audit Type Team Leader Audit Team
Monthly
1st 16 March, 2020 HWO, Casing, Fishing, QA/QC, Jar Equipment Audit Irenus Emeruem Ifeanyi Peters, Irenus Emeruem, Jude Udehbhulu
weeks services, Machineshop/Fabrication,
Workstring/Drill String, SHDEM, Ken Oga-Eluwa, Gbenga bamiduro, Akpos Itsekor
NBDC
HSEMS ((Leadership
Commitment, Policy,
2nd 16 July , 2020 QHSE, Casing, Fishing, Machine and Organisation) Tony Oputa Akpos Itsekor, Manafa Stephen, Tona Kadiri,
weeks Shop/Fabrication, Work String/Drill
String, SHDEM, HWO, Top
Management, Rig sites
Innocent Ikekpeazu, Chris Asimiakhuini, Chika

Ibeabuchi, Chibuzor Nzeribe
3rd 16 November, Logistics, HWO, Casing, Fishing, Work DROPS Audit Henry Ayanruoh
weeks 2020. String / Drill String, Machineshop/
Fabrication, SHDEM, QHSE, Rig sites.
APPENDIX 5: 2020 QHSE EXTERNAL AUDIT PROGRAM
MONTH CONTRACTOR AUDIT TEAM
P a g e | 106
Audit Type Team Lead AUDIT TEAM
MEMBERS
February 27, 2020 C & I Leasing PLC Road Transport / Journey Jude Udehbhulu Ifeanyi Peters, Tona
Management Kadiri, Kalu Ukpai
May 20, 2020 Detagulf Global Services Inspection Chinedu Oguejiofor Akpos Itsekor,
Manafa Stephen,
Chijioke Uchendu.
Henry Ayanruoh,
Dandy Ilione, Sunny
August 20, 2020 Energyray Integrated Services Ltd. Inspection / Training Valentine Arisukwu
Timmeh.
October 22, 2020 Ponyx Hospital Medical Services Segun Smith Pius Nwoga,
Gbenga Bamiduro,

APPENDIX 6: 2020 TECON GROUP MANAGEMENT SITE VISIT PLAN
Month Casimir C. Chinedu Segun Val Chris Gabriel Sunny Innocent Irenus Ken Jude Tony Emmanuel Chika Ifeanyi Chijioke Akpobome Henry INSPECTION
Maduafokw Oguejiofor(R Smith-IRM Arisukwu Asimiakhuin Ahaneku Timeh Ikekpeaz Emeruem Oga- Udehbhul Oputa Nzeribe Ibeabuchi Peters Uchendu Itsekor Ayanruo TARGET
a (CEO) M) - i -HOD -MFS -Ws/Ds u (HWO -HWO Eluwa- u -Bus Finance Bus Dev - Mat. (HWO -Bus.Dev QHSE h HSE
P a g e | 107
Technical Ops Casing Dev Project Rig
SHDEM Manager HOD Rig Mgr) Man. Mgr. Mgr. Man Man
Mgr. Manager Manager Manager Man. Mgr)
Janaury
February X X X X 2
March X X X X 2
Qtr. 1 4
April X X X X X 2
May X X X 2
June X X X X 2
Qtr. 2 6
July X X X X 2
August X X X 2
Septembe
r X X X X 2
Qtr. 3 6
October X X X 2
November X X X X 2
December X X X X X X 2
Qtr. 4 6
VISIT
TARGET 2 3 2 2 3 2 2 2 3 2 3 2 2 2 2 4 4

NOTE: Implementation of site visit will be based on the existence of field operations. The Group HSE Manager should be informed of any regrets at least 48
hours before visit.
P a g e | 108

SIGNED:………………………………………………………………………….
CASIMIR MADUAFOKWA
(CEO / PRESIDENT)
APPENDIX 7: 2020 QUALITY, HEALTH, SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENT BUDGET

DESCRIPTION COST (N)
HEALTH
Staff Medical Expenses / Fitness to work Certification 20.000,000
First Aid boxes and Drugs 8, 500,000
SAFETY
Training /Certification / Permits 12,000,000
Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) 35,000,000
Emergency preparedness Equipment (Fire Extinguisher, spill containment materials, 8,000,000

ambulance requirement, Fire Suits etc)
HSE Incentives / Awards 170,000
P a g e | 109
External Safety Inspections 200,000
Equipment certification / Premob Certification. 17,000,000
QUALITY, SECURITY AND ENVIRONMENT
Quality control and Tools Inspection 8,000,000
Cleaning Services 20,000,000
Waste disposal 2,000,000
Fumigation 800,000
Security Matters 3,500,000
MISCELLANEOUS:
Signages / Safety literature 300,000
Community Relations 1,700,000
Miscellaneous 2,000,000
TOTAL PROJECTED COST 130, 670,000
P a g e | 110

Hor S Contract HSE Plan Template

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Hor S Contract HSE Plan Template

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

CONTRACT HSE PLAN

(Mode 1, 2 Medium/High Risk Contracts Template -Please delete when finalized)

Subcontractor Companies PRIMS CRUISIM- CATEERING SERVICES

2. HOPSON HAULAGE –RIG MOVERS

3. PHOENIX HOSPITAL – MEDICAL RETAINERSHIP

Contract HSSE Risk Level MEDIUM LEVEL

Printed copies are

Role Name Company Signature Date

Prepared by (Cont. HSE Off/Mgr)

Reviewed by (Line SE Support)

Approved by (Contractor CEO)

Approved by (Contract Holder)

Printed copies are

Printed copies are

Printed copies are

18 Retrieve old Completion tubing.

19 Bit & Scraper run

20 L/D Drill pipe

21 Run in hole new completions tubing

22 Land completion string and te st same

23 ND / BOPs. NU and test Xmas Tree

24 Lift Well to Live

25 Hand over well

Printed copies are

Work duration starting 19th Feb. 2019 to 2nd April. 2019

Printed copies are

Printed copies are

4.1 Leadership & Commitment

Printed copies are

Present a safety monthly meeting.

Prepare/Update/Maintain Procedures /Reviews/Updates to

Organizational Review /Update %

Prepare /deploy EHS

Audit reports to categorize %

No. Team Lead and EHSQ Rep.

Printed copies are

4.2 Policy & Strategic Objective

o How will you develop HSSE Objectives for the Contract?

Printed copies are

Dated: January, 2018

Printed copies are

ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES

HWO SERVICES/LOGISTICS SUPPORT MANAGER AND MARINE OPERATIONS MANAGER

OPERATORS /CAPTAINS CREW HEADS

 Briefing staff on safe work methods.

Printed copies are

SUB CONTRACTOR’S RESPONSIBILITIES

 Adopt similar HSE policies as TOS, SPDC, or any of our clients

Client’s Supervisor on Site.

HWOU Project Manager –

Printed copies are

HWOU Work Baske jack Operator:

HWOU Assistant Operator :

HWOU HSE Officers (Safety Training Coordinator STC)

Printed copies are

Hse Criticak Task & Competence Requirement

Meeting Attendance Frequency Purpose Leader

Printed copies are

CASHES Committee members Quarterly To review CASHES performance for CEO

4.4 Risk Management

Task description : Mobilise equipment to site

Printed copies are

Printed copies are