Technische Universität München

Master’s Programme Land Management and Land Tenure

Institute of Geodesy, GIS and Land Management
Chair of Land Management
Arcisstrasse 21, 80333 Munich, Germany

LETTER OF RECOMMENDATION
Master’s Programme Land Management and Land Tenure

A. To be Completed by the Applicant

Please fill in your name, sign the form, and give this form to a professor or another person who is well acquainted with your academic
work and/or professional experience. Ask your recommender to mail the completed form back to you in a sealed envelope. You should
then send the envelope to TUM with the rest of your application materials.
Last Name First Name Middle Name

Signature of the applicant Date Month Year

B. To be Completed by the Recommender

The person whose name appears above is applying for admission to the Master’s Programme Land Management and Land Tenure at
Technische Universität München, Germany.
We would appreciate your personal impressions of the applicant’s intellectual ability, aptitude in research and professional skill, work
experience, and his or her ability to carry out advanced study and research. Please comment on the applicant’s character and his or
her capacity to adapt to a foreign culture. Please mail the form back to the applicant in a sealed envelope.
We thank you for the time and effort you take to complete this form. If you have any questions, please send an email to Ms. Fahria
Masum (Masum@landentwicklung-muenchen.de).

Last Name First Name Middle Name

Institution

Address

Position

Signature Date Month Year

1. How long and in what capacity have you known the applicant?
Technische Universität München
Master’s Programme Land Management and Land Tenure
Institute of Geodesy, GIS and Land Management
Chair of Land Management
Arcisstrasse 21, 80333 Munich, Germany

2. Your Letter of Recommendation:

3. If you are a former professor of the applicant, please answer the following question.

Among approximately ____ students I have known in comparable fields, I rank this student as follows:

Exceptional Outstanding Very Good Good Somewhat above Below average

(top 3%) (top 10%) (top 20%) (top 30%) average (top 50%) (bottom 50%)

1 2 3 4 5 6