State full name & tutorial group in block capital

………………………………………. …………………

Modular Programme Assignment

Cover Sheet
(Assignment Only)

Please complete the form (in capital letters) and attach it securely to the front of your assignment before submitting your
assignment.
Student ID: ………………………………………………. Student ID: ……………………………………………….

Programme: ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Name of module: ……………………………………………… Name of tutor: ………………………………………………

Module code:

Assignment title: …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

Due date & time: ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

We have read and understood the TU Dual Award Regulations on cheating, plagiarism and collusion and state that this piece
of work is our own and does not contain any unacknowledged work from any other sources.

We authorise the University to test any work submitted by me, using text comparison software, for instances of plagiarism.
We understand this will involve the University or its contractor copying my work and storing it on a database to be used in
future to test work submitted by others.

Note: The attachment of this statement on any electronically submitted assignments will be deemed to have the same
authority as a signed statement.

Signed:
Date: ..........................................
 1

DUAL AWARD PROGRAMME - ASSIGNMENT Mark*

FEEDBACK

*This mark is provisional and is

subject to moderation and approval
by the examining board

A. A feedback needs to be included with each assignment. Please complete all details in block capital clearly.

Student ID: Student ID:

Student ID: Student ID:

Student ID: Student ID:

Title of Your Award:

Module Name and Code :

Name of Tutor:

Assignment Title:

B. This section will be completed by the tutor assessing your

assignment:
Key: 1. Outstanding 2. Very Good 3. Good 4. Satisfactory 5. Weak 6. Unsatisfactory

Structure 1 2 3 4 5 6
Material relevant to question       Little relevance to question
Argument logically developed       Unstructured/lacking
continuity
Content
Accurate presentation of argument       Many Inaccuracies
Application: theory/principle       No application:
theory/principle
Question covered in sufficient depth       Superficial treatment

Originality
Evidence of creative thought       Little evidence of creative
thought
Style
Fluent & well written       Clumsily written

Succinct writing       Too repetitive

Presentation
Logical & well set out       Lacking logical flow/poorly
set out

Sources
Good reference of sources       Inadequate range
Correct citation of references       Incorrect referencing
Language
Grammatical sentences       Weak grammatically
Correct spelling       Much incorrect spelling
Effective/accurate use of figures and       Use ineffective or
tables inaccurate

Any additional comments (if there is any):

Assessed by: Date: