ISO19030 Ship Performance Monitoring

VECTOR MARINE SOFTWARE LTD
Ship Performance and Condition Monitoring;

ISO19030, TMSA3 and Beyond…
Vasileios Tsarsitalidis
SNAME Technical meeting

Athens, May 23 2018
Scope / Setup
Show the impact of accurate and reliable monitoring, as a key to

timely decision making
Present the upcoming standards, the required setup and their

usefulness
Draw attention to potential errors from poor adherence

(compliance is not enough)
Show additional capabilities, employing the same foundations
Ship Performance and Condition Monitoring; SNAME Technical meeting

ISO19030, TMSA3 and Beyond… 1 Athens, May 23 2018
ISO 19030
The objective is to compare the hull and propeller performance of the same ship to
itself over time
Part1
The general principles outlined and performance indicators defined
Part2
Defines the default method for measuring changes in hull and propeller performance
and calculating a set of basic performance indicators
Part3
Alternatives to the default method / Proxies

ISO 19030-1
Total Resistance = calm water +wind + waves + hull condition
(fouling, mechanical damages, bulging, paint film blistering, paint detachment, etc.)
ISO defines
Speed Through Water and Delivered Power
As primary parameters
In order to apply the filtering and normalization
Relevant environmental factors:

wind speed and direction; significant wave height, direction and spectrum; swell height, direction
and spectrum; water depth; water temperature and density.
Relevant operational factors:

speed; loading conditions (static draught, static trim, heel); dynamic floating conditions (motions,
dynamic draught, dynamic trim); rudder angle / frequency of rudder movements.

ISO 19030-1
Performance indicator Definition
Change in hull and propeller performance following present

Dry-docking performance:
out-docking (Evaluation period) as compared with the average from
previous out-dockings (Reference periods).
The (running) average change in hull and propeller

In-service performance:
performance from a period following out-docking (Reference
period) to the end of the dry-docking interval (Evaluation period).
Change in hull and propeller performance from

Maintenance trigger:
the start of the dry-docking interval (Reference period) to a
moving average at any chosen time (Evaluation period).
Change in hull and propeller performance

Maintenance effect:
measured before (Reference period) and after (Evaluation period)
a maintenance event.

ISO 19030-2
Parameter Acceptable measurement device / source Unit Minimum Data acquisition rate
Vessel speed through

Speed log (accuracy of 1% or better) [kn] Once every 15 seconds (0,07Hz)
Primary water
Parameters Same as for vessel speed and
Delivered Power Torque Meter (accuracy of 1% or better) [kW]
same time stamp as vessel speed
Pick-up, optical sensor, ship revs counter
Shaft revolutions [RPM] Once every 15 seconds (0,07Hz)
w/ minimum sensor accuracy of ±0,5 %, 1σ
Relative wind Ship anemometer
[m/s], [°] Once every 15 seconds (0,07Hz)
speed/direction - minimum sensor accuracy of ±1m/s, ±5°
Speed over ground and Speed over ground, Gyro compass, or compass -
[kn], [°] Once every 15 seconds (0,07Hz)
ship heading DGPS
Rudder angle indicator

Rudder angle [°] Once every 15 seconds (0,07Hz)
- minimum sensor accuracy of ±1°
Ship echo sounder w/ minimum sensor accuracy of -
Secondary +/- 0,5 m on the 20m range scale, respectively
Parameters Water depth [m] Once every 15 seconds (0,07Hz)
+/- 5m on the 200m range scale; or - +/-2,5% of the
indicated depth, whichever is greater.
Information from loading or stability computer or
Static draught fore and Whenever loading condition
equivalent sources for static draught. [m]
aft changes
NOTE Preference for observed draft – when available.
Sea Water Temperature Thermometer [°C] Once every 15 seconds (0,07Hz)
Once every 15 seconds (0,07Hz) [°C] Once every 15 seconds (0,07Hz)

Ambient Air Temperature
Once every 15 seconds (0,07Hz)

Air Pressure Barometer [Pa]

ISO 19030-2
speed-power data
• From full-scale speed trials that were conducted and analyzed according to
ISO 15016
• From towing tank tests having demonstrated compliance with international
standards of quality
• From computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations conducted and
analyzed following generally accepted state-of-the-art procedures

ISO 19030

ISO 19030-3
Proxy Parameters Alternative Power curves
Allows for curve fitting of the

form
P=aVb
And linearize using logarithms

Log(P)=log(a)=blog(V)+ε
And applying least squares for
the data points.

TMSA3
4.4.4 The planned maintenance system includes the use of condition-based
monitoring in order to ensure optimal equipment performance.
- Performance monitoring. - Remote diagnostics.
4A.4.1 The reliability and performance of critical equipment or systems and

associated alarms is monitored and analyzed.
- Condition-based monitoring. - Trends and historical data - Predictive maintenance
tools.
10.2.2 The environmental management plan addresses efficient use of energy and
includes actions to improve environmental performance
- Baseline criteria. - Regular performance reviews including SFOC trends, Hull
condition, Propeller fouling etc.

TMSA3 (contd.)
10.2.3 The company seeks to optimize vessel energy efficiency

- Optimization of vessel trim. - Speed optimization where practical. - Optimizing
onboard power management such as the use of generators and boilers. - Propeller
polishing/cleaning. - Hull cleaning
10.4.1Available technology is used to enhance energy efficiency

- New coatings. - Real time performance monitoring and comparative analysis of vessels. -
Condition monitoring of environmentally critical equipment. - Engine auto-tuning. - Main
engine de-rating. - Alternative energy efficient fuels. - Energy Saving Devices.
10.4.3 Fleet environmental performance and energy efficiency is benchmarked

- within the company and across the industry

Owner’s Needs
INCREASE UPTIME AND REDUCE OPERATING COSTS
• Predict problems before they happen and avoid failures.
• Receive expert recommendations on how to maximize the data value.
• Extend/ Optimize maintenance intervals.
• Move from “scheduled” to “as needed” maintenance to reduce costs.
• Integrate existing enterprise systems.
MONITOR PRODUCTIVITY AND MANAGE VESSEL EFFICIENCY

• Minimize downtime and maximize revenue producing uptime.
• Reduce total vessel fuel burn and increase fuel efficiency.
• Use real data to improve operational decision making.
ENHANCE AWARENESS TO KEEP PEOPLE AND EQUIPMENT SAFE

• Create transparency for unsafe operations and equipment condition.
• Promote a positive safety culture.
REDUCE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AND SIMPLIFY COMPLIANCE

• Make compliance reporting easier with automated monitoring.
• Reduce emissions by burning less fuel.

APPLICATION ON VESSEL

Hull Modelling

CFD

Verification with Towing Tank Test

Propeller Modelling

Propeller Modelling

Wake, estimation of w
This gives only the Nominal Wake

fraction.
For the effective:

- Self propulsion test results
- Torque equation method (using real
data for very good conditions)
The other Hull Interaction factors (t,nR)

are taken from Towing Tank tests or
empirical methods

ISO 19030 Draft - Trim – Speed - Power Database

Telemetry Data

All measurements....

Data Cleaning

Evaluating Power Increase
Curve for given Draft and Trim
Case 1

Fouling due to a long stop Identified
Case 2

Problems / Sensitivities
CFD accuracy
Missing Hull, Propeller and Appendages information
Interaction factors
Effects of swell Missed by the existing model

Problems / Sensitivities
• Skewed Baseline Model
Considerations on CFD
2016 Workshop on Ship Scale Hydrodynamic Computer Simulation
Extended Mesh Independence Tests are Required

Problems / Sensitivities – Skewed model
6M
4M

Effect of Timestep

Skewed model
T=21.6m T=15m T=10m

Skewed model - Effect
6M
4M

Power increase, Speed loss and Weather Effects
Vessel 1
Vessel 2
(case 1)

Distinguishing Hull from Propeller
J  VS (1  w) / (ND)
KQ ( J )  SHP R S / (2 N 3 D5 )
K Q ( J1 )   K Q  SHP1 R S / (2 N13 D 5 )

K Q ( J 2 )   K Q  SHP2  R S / (2 N 23 D 5 ) 2Χ2
system
J1  VS 1 (1  w1   w) / (N1 D)
J 2  VS 2 (1  w2   w) / (N 2 D)

Vessel 1 Vessel 2
(case 1)

Reminder Slide 31
Vessel 1
Vessel 2


Impact of Investment
Propeller cleaning
power
power daily
daily cleanin fuelfuel
MCR
MCR load cleaning Payback
Payback
vessel
vessel load (%) change
change savings
savings g cost price
price
(MW)
(MW) (%) cost ($) (days)
(days)
(%)
(%) (MT)
(MT) ($) ($/MT)
($/MT)
1 18.7
18.7 50
35
60 6 2.33
1.70
2.76 5000
5000 370
370 6.43
8.91
5.31
2 24 50
35
60 2.5
2.5 1.37
0.96
1.65 8000
8000 370
370 15.76
22.49
13.15
Hull cleaning
power daily fuel
MCR cleaning Payback
vessel load (%) change savings price
(MW) cost ($) (days)
(%) (MT) ($/MT)
1 18.7 35
50
60 10 2.83
3.89
4.59 20000 370 21.45
15.44
12.70
2 24 35
50
60 12 4.62
6.60
7.91 40000 370 23.43
16.42
13.70

THE VMS SUITE
Chartering Operations
Manager Manager
Knowledge
EU MRV Manager
ISO Manager
Data
Acquisition
Manning
Manager
Maintenance
Manager
Purchasing Payroll
Manager Financial Manager
Manager

Closing Remarks
Continuous monitoring of ship performance allows for

- timely maintenance
- early detection of problems
- defense against claims
- evaluation of costs/benefits from actions
Future work
• Weather effects (swell effects)
• External source data
• “AI” solutions (Machine learning, adaptive filtering, Etc.)

Acknowledgements
Technical Department of Neda Maritime Agency Co Ltd, of Piraeus Greece
Dmitriy Ponkratov, Senior Consultant of Technical Investigation Department of

Lloyd’s Register

Vector Marine Software
info@vector.gr BTsars@vector.gr
Questions ?

ISO19030 Ship Performance Monitoring

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

ISO19030 Ship Performance Monitoring

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

VECTOR MARINE SOFTWARE LTD

Ship Performance and Condition Monitoring;

SNAME Technical meeting

Show the impact of accurate and reliable monitoring, as a key to

Present the upcoming standards, the required setup and their

Draw attention to potential errors from poor adherence

Show additional capabilities, employing the same foundations

Ship Performance and Condition Monitoring; SNAME Technical meeting

Alternatives to the default method / Proxies

Ship Performance and Condition Monitoring; SNAME Technical meeting

In order to apply the filtering and normalization

Relevant environmental factors:

Relevant operational factors:

Ship Performance and Condition Monitoring; SNAME Technical meeting

Change in hull and propeller performance following present

The (running) average change in hull and propeller

Change in hull and propeller performance from

Change in hull and propeller performance

Ship Performance and Condition Monitoring; SNAME Technical meeting

Vessel speed through

Rudder angle indicator

Sea Water Temperature Thermometer [°C] Once every 15 seconds (0,07Hz)

Once every 15 seconds (0,07Hz) [°C] Once every 15 seconds (0,07Hz)

Once every 15 seconds (0,07Hz)

Ship Performance and Condition Monitoring; SNAME Technical meeting

Ship Performance and Condition Monitoring; SNAME Technical meeting

Ship Performance and Condition Monitoring; SNAME Technical meeting

Allows for curve fitting of the

And linearize using logarithms

Ship Performance and Condition Monitoring; SNAME Technical meeting

4A.4.1 The reliability and performance of critical equipment or systems and

Ship Performance and Condition Monitoring; SNAME Technical meeting

10.2.3 The company seeks to optimize vessel energy efficiency

10.4.1Available technology is used to enhance energy efficiency

10.4.3 Fleet environmental performance and energy efficiency is benchmarked

Ship Performance and Condition Monitoring; SNAME Technical meeting

MONITOR PRODUCTIVITY AND MANAGE VESSEL EFFICIENCY

ENHANCE AWARENESS TO KEEP PEOPLE AND EQUIPMENT SAFE

REDUCE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AND SIMPLIFY COMPLIANCE

Ship Performance and Condition Monitoring; SNAME Technical meeting

Ship Performance and Condition Monitoring; SNAME Technical meeting

Ship Performance and Condition Monitoring; SNAME Technical meeting

Ship Performance and Condition Monitoring; SNAME Technical meeting

Ship Performance and Condition Monitoring; SNAME Technical meeting

Ship Performance and Condition Monitoring; SNAME Technical meeting

Ship Performance and Condition Monitoring; SNAME Technical meeting

This gives only the Nominal Wake

For the effective:

The other Hull Interaction factors (t,nR)

Ship Performance and Condition Monitoring; SNAME Technical meeting

Ship Performance and Condition Monitoring; SNAME Technical meeting

Ship Performance and Condition Monitoring; SNAME Technical meeting

Ship Performance and Condition Monitoring; SNAME Technical meeting

Ship Performance and Condition Monitoring; SNAME Technical meeting

Curve for given Draft and Trim

Ship Performance and Condition Monitoring; SNAME Technical meeting

Ship Performance and Condition Monitoring; SNAME Technical meeting

Missing Hull, Propeller and Appendages information

Effects of swell Missed by the existing model

Ship Performance and Condition Monitoring; SNAME Technical meeting

2016 Workshop on Ship Scale Hydrodynamic Computer Simulation

Extended Mesh Independence Tests are Required