You are on page 1of 128

Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

A single copy of this document is licensed to

DUBLIN

On

16/09/2013

This is an uncontrolled copy. Ensure use of the


most current version of the document by searching
the Construction Information Service.
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.
Prices for all available BRE
publications can be obtained from:
BRE Bookshop
151 Rosebery Avenue
London, EC1R 4GB
Tel: 020 7505 6622
Fax: 020 7505 6606
e-mail: brebookshop@emap.com
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

BR 455
ISBN 1 86081 611 8

© Copyright BRE 2003


First published 2003

Currently available only in electronic


format.

On CD-ROM ISSN 1471-2032.

Produced from authors’ material as


supplied.

BRE is committed to providing


impartial and authoritative
information on all aspects of the
built environment for clients,
designers, contractors, engineers,
manufacturers, occupants, etc. We
make every effort to ensure the
accuracy and quality of information
and guidance when it is first
published. However, we can take no
responsibility for the subsequent
use of this information, nor for any
errors or omissions it may contain.

Published by
BRE Bookshop
by permission of
Building Research Establishment Ltd

Requests to copy any part of this


publication should be made to:
BRE Bookshop
Building Research Establishment
Bucknalls Lane
Watford, WD25 9XX

BRE material is also published quarterly on CD BRE Bookshop


Each CD contains BRE material published in the BRE Bookshop supplies a wide range of building and
current year, including reports, specialist reports, and construction related information products from BRE
the Professional Development publications: Digests, and other highly respected organisations.
Good Building Guides, Good Repair Guides and
Information Papers. Contact:
post: BRE Bookshop
The CD collection gives you the opportunity to build a 151 Rosebery Avenue
comprehensive library of BRE material at a fraction of London, EC1R 4GB
the cost of printed copies.
fax: 020 7505 6606
As a subscriber you also benefit from a 25% discount phone: 020 7505 6622
on other BRE titles. email: brebookshop@emap.com
website: www.brebookshop.com
For more information contact:
BRE Bookshop on 020 7505 6622
iii

Contents
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Summary report
Design calculations to Eurocode 2
Design calculations to BS 8110
Reinforcement drawings for a typical floor
Material quantities and construction costs
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.
5HLQIRUFHGFRQFUHWHIUDPHGVWUXFWXUH
FRPSDUDWLYHGHVLJQVWXG\WR(&DQG%6
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

6XPPDU\UHSRUW

6FRSH
7KLVGHVNVWXG\ZDVFRPPLVVLRQHGE\%XLOGLQJ5HVHDUFK(VWDEOLVKPHQW/WG %5( DV
SDUWRI7DVNRIWKH'7/5 QRZ2'30 ³)UDPHZRUN´3URMHFWIRUWKHLPSOHPHQWDWLRQRI
(XURFRGHIRUWKHGHVLJQRIFRQFUHWHVWUXFWXUHVLQWKH8.,WVSXUSRVHZDVWRSUHSDUHDQG
FRPSDUHSDUDOOHOGHVLJQVRIDW\SLFDOUHLQIRUFHGFRQFUHWHIUDPHGVWUXFWXUHWR(&DQG
%6LQRUGHUWRDVVHVVWKHLUGLIIHUHQFHVLQWHUPVRIHFRQRP\RIFRQVWUXFWLRQDQG
GHVLJQSURFHVV7KLVVWXG\ZLOOKRSHIXOO\SURYLGHSDUWRIWKHFDOLEUDWLRQGDWDUHTXLUHGWR
DVVLVWWKHFRPPLWWHHSUHSDULQJWKH8.1DWLRQDO$QQH[WR(&

7KHIROORZLQJVHFWLRQVDUHLQFOXGHGLQWKHPDLQUHSRUW

'HVLJQFDOFXODWLRQVWR(XURFRGH
'HVLJQFDOFXODWLRQVWR%6
5HLQIRUFHPHQWGUDZLQJVIRUDW\SLFDOIORRU
0DWHULDOTXDQWLWLHVDQGFRQVWUXFWLRQFRVWV

,ZRXOGOLNHWRWKDQN'U7RQ\-RQHVRI$UXS5HVHDUFKDQG'HYHORSPHQWIRUSURYLGLQJWKH
JHQHUDODUUDQJHPHQWGHWDLOVIRUDVHFWLRQRIDW\SLFDOWHQVWRUH\IUDPHGVWUXFWXUH

'HVLJQVROXWLRQ
7KHSODQFKRVHQIRUWKHVWXG\ZDVVHOHFWHGEHFDXVHLWKDVDVOLJKWO\LUUHJXODUOD\RXWZLWK
IDLUO\W\SLFDOVSDQVRIDQGP$VZHOODVFRQWDLQLQJDOORIWKHHOHPHQWVQHFHVVDU\
IRUWKHVWXG\WKHUHLVDSUREOHPDWLFORQJIUHHHGJHVSDQRQWKHZHVWVLGH7KLVLVWKHW\SH
RIOD\RXWUHJXODUO\IRXQGLQHYHU\GD\SUDFWLFHDQGZDVWKRXJKWWREHPRUHUHSUHVHQWDWLYH
WKDQDPRUHUHJXODUDUUDQJHPHQW

)ODWVODEFRQVWUXFWLRQKDVEHHQVHOHFWHGIRUWKHIORRUVDVWKLVLVFRPPRQO\WKHSUHIHUUHG
DQGPRVWHFRQRPLFVWUXFWXUDOVROXWLRQ+RZHYHUWZREHDPVKDYHEHHQLQWURGXFHGZLWKLQ
WKHFDQWLOHYHUHGDUHDDWWKHVRXWKHDVWFRUQHULQRUGHUWROLPLWGHIOHFWLRQV

,QRUGHUWRSURYLGHDEHWWHUFRPSDULVRQEHWZHHQWKHWZRGHVLJQFRGHVFRQYHQWLRQDO
EDVHPHQWUHWDLQLQJZDOOVKDYHEHHQHPSOR\HGLQSUHIHUHQFHWRDFRQWLJXRXVSLOHGZDOO
VROXWLRQDQGSDGIRRWLQJV DWDQXQUHDOLVWLFN1PJURXQGEHDULQJSUHVVXUH KDYH
EHHQVHOHFWHGLQSUHIHUHQFHWRSLOHFDSV

'HVLJQSDUDPHWHUV
7KHIROORZLQJJHQHUDOEULHILWHPVZHUHDJUHHGIURPGLVFXVVLRQZLWK'U5LFKDUG0RVVRI
%5(DQGPHPEHUVRIWKH&,(* &RQFUHWH,QGXVWU\(XURFRGH*URXS 


'HVLJQ&RGHV (XURFRGHUHYLVHGILQDOGUDIWRISU(1
%63DUWDQG3DUW
$VVRFLDWHGORDGLQJFRGHV

1DWLRQDO$QQH[ $VVXPH8.YDOXHIRUαFFLV
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

/RDGLQJ $SSOLHGGHDGORDG N1P


)ORRULPSRVHGORDGLQJ N1PSOXVN1PIRUSDUWLWLRQV
5RRILPSRVHGORDGLQJ N1P
3HULPHWHUFODGGLQJ N1P

'HIOHFWLRQOLPLWV (&TXDVLSHUPDQHQWGHIOHFWLRQ /


%6ORQJWHUPWRWDOGHIOHFWLRQ /
$IIHFWLQJSHULPHWHUFODGGLQJ /

&RQFUHWH &ROXPQVDQGVKHDUZDOOVEHORZOHYHOJUDGH&
(OVHZKHUHJUDGH&

IFNYDOXHVRIDQG1PP DUHDQH[DFWPDWFKIRU%6JUDGHV&DQG&DQGKDYHEHHQXVHG
LQSUHIHUHQFHWRURXQGHGGRZQFRGHPL[HVLQRUGHUWRSURYLGHDWUXHFRPSDULVRQ

5HLQIRUFHPHQW +LJK\LHOGGHIRUPHG(&I\N 1PP%6I\ 1PP

([SRVXUH 0RGHUDWH )LUHSHULRG 2QHKRXU

6ODEVDQGFROXPQVVKRXOGKDYHPLQLPXPVL]HVWRUHOHYDQWFRGHUHTXLUHPHQWV

$Q\DGYDQWDJHWREHJDLQHGIURPHTXDWLRQVDDQGELQSU(1VKRXOGEH
XWLOLVHG

6RIWZDUH
7KHIROORZLQJGHVLJQVRIWZDUHKDVEHHQXVHGLQWKHSUHSDUDWLRQRIWKHDWWDFKHG
FDOFXODWLRQVDQGTXDQWLWLHV

)ORRUVODEV )(03ODWH 6NDQVND,76ROXWLRQV


6KHDUZDOOV )(06XSHU6WUXFWXUH
$OORWKHUPHPEHUV 5&&6SUHDGVKHHWVIRU&RQFUHWH'HVLJQ
EHWDYHUVLRQVXVHGIRU(&ODWHVWGUDIW
%DU6FKHGXOLQJ %DU6FKHG[OW &%XN]NRZVNL

/RDGLQJ
7KHJDPPDIDFWRUVIRUGHVLJQDW8/6GLIIHUVXEVWDQWLDOO\EHWZHHQWKHWZRFRGHV7KH
IDPLOLDU*N4NLVXVHGIRU%6EXWIRUWKH(&GHVLJQ*N4N
HTXDWLRQELQSU(1 LVSHUPLWWHGWKLVEHLQJPRUHRQHURXVLQWKLVFDVHWKDQWKH
*N4NGHULYHGIURPHTXDWLRQD7KLVUHGXFWLRQLQXOWLPDWHORDGLQJFRPSDUHG
ZLWK%6FDQUHGXFHUHLQIRUFHPHQWQHHGHGDW8/6WKXVLQFUHDVLQJWKHLPSRUWDQFHRI
FKHFNVDW6/6ZKHUHGHIOHFWLRQUHTXLUHPHQWVFDQFRQWURO


7KHSDWWHUQRIORDGLQJLVDOVRGLIIHUHQWLQ(&%6UHTXLUHVWKDWWKHDOOVSDQVORDGHG
DQGDOWHUQDWHVSDQVORDGHGFDVHVEHFRQVLGHUHGZKHUHDV(&UHTXLUHVWKDWDGMDFHQW
VSDQVDQGDOWHUQDWHVSDQVORDGHGVLWXDWLRQVEHFKHFNHG7KLVKDVWKHHIIHFWRI
VLJQLILFDQWO\LQFUHDVLQJSHDNVXSSRUWPRPHQWV DQGKHQFHVKHDUV DOWKRXJKWKHGHVLJQ
PRPHQWVDWFROXPQIDFHVDUHPDUJLQDOO\OHVVDIIHFWHG&RQYHUVHO\EHFDXVH(&GRHVQRW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

UHTXLUHGHDGORDGWREHSDWWHUQHGSRVLWLYHVSDQPRPHQWVDUHPDUJLQDOO\UHGXFHG

,WVKRXOGEHQRWHGWKDWERWKGHVLJQVDUHIRUDQLPSRVHGORDGLQJRI  N1PZKHUHDV
WKH%6ORDGLQJFRGHFDOOVIRUN1PDQG(XURFRGHVIRUN1P

6ODEV
0DLQO\EHFDXVHRIWKHLUUHJXODUFROXPQOD\RXWILQLWHHOHPHQWDQDO\VLVKDVEHHQXVHG$
PRGLILHGVXEIUDPHDSSURDFKFRXOGKDYHEHHQDGRSWHGEXWWKLVZRXOGKDYHEHHQOHVV
WLPHHIILFLHQWDQGZRXOGQRWSUHGLFWFULWLFDOSHULPHWHUGHIOHFWLRQV7KHSODWHGHVLJQ
VRIWZDUHHPSOR\HGXWLOLVHVLWHUDWLYHFUDFNHGVHFWLRQDQDO\VLVWRDUULYHDWVHSDUDWHVWLIIQHVV
PDWULFHVIRU8/6DQG6/67KLVPHWKRGDVZHOODVJLYLQJUHDVRQDEOHSUHGLFWLRQVRI
GHIOHFWLRQVHIIHFWLYHO\PRGHOVFUDFNLQJSDWWHUQVDURXQGVXSSRUWVWKHUHE\UHGXFLQJHGJH
DQGFRUQHUFROXPQPRPHQWVDQGHOLPLQDWLQJWKHQHHGWRPDQXDOO\DGMXVWIRU0WPD[

0RGHOOLQJ 7KHDUHDVRFFXSLHGE\FROXPQVKDYHEHHQPRGHOOHGDVGHHSHUUHJLRQV DV
RSSRVHGWRSRLQWVXSSRUWV WRJLYHDEHWWHUHVWLPDWHRIGHIOHFWLRQV)RUWKHVDPHUHDVRQ
DIWHUGHWHUPLQLQJUHLQIRUFHPHQWUHTXLUHGWKHPRGHOVZHUHUHUXQZLWK³DSSOLHG´
UHLQIRUFHPHQW

$VWKHGHIOHFWLRQVDIIHFWLQJWKHZHVWHUQSHULPHWHUFODGGLQJSURYHGWREHFULWLFDOLQ
GHWHUPLQLQJVODEWKLFNQHVVLWZDVQHFHVVDU\WRFDUU\RXWWKUHHUXQVIRUHDFKFRGHZLWK
YDU\LQJFUHHSIDFWRUV
D  XQGHUTXDVLSHUPDQHQWORDGLQJWRFRPSDUHZLWKWKH/OLPLW
E  XQGHUVHOIZHLJKWDWWKHDSSOLFDWLRQRIFODGGLQJDQG
F  XQGHUWRWDOORDGORQJWHUP F±EWREHFRPSDUHGZLWK/ 

)RUHDFKRIWKHDERYHFRQGLWLRQVDFRPSRVLWHFUHHSIDFWRUZDVGHWHUPLQHGIURPWKH
PDJQLWXGHDQGDJHDWDSSOLFDWLRQRIHDFKUHOHYDQWORDGFRPSRQHQW

6L]LQJ 7KHILQDOVODEGHSWKVUHTXLUHGWRVDWLVI\WKHSHULPHWHUGHIOHFWLRQOLPLWZHUH
PPIRU(&DQGPPIRU%67KHUHDUHVHYHUDOUHDVRQVIRUWKLVGLIIHUHQFH
WKHSULQFLSDOUHDVRQVEHLQJ

7KHLQVWDQWDQHRXV(&IRUJUDGH&LV1PPWR(&EXWRQO\1PPWR%6
 
7KHFUDFNLQJVWUHVVLV1PP WR(&EXWRQO\1PP WR%6
7R(&WHQVLRQVWLIIHQLQJLQFUHDVHVZLWKDJHEXWWR%6LWUHGXFHV

$OORIWKHVHWHQGWRSURGXFHVPDOOHUGLVSODFHPHQWVWR(&DOWKRXJKWKHVHHIIHFWVDUH
SDUWLDOO\RIIVHWE\DJUHDWHUGHQVLW\IRUFRQFUHWH N1PDVRSSRVHGWR PPPRUH
ERWWRPFRYHUDQGWKHVOLJKWO\GLIIHUHQWUHODWLRQVKLSEHWZHHQVXSSRUWDQGVSDQVWHHO

,QHYHU\GD\SUDFWLFHWKHDERYHVHOHFWHGVODEGHSWKVPD\KDYHEHHQURXQGHGXSWRWKH
QHDUHVWPPJLYLQJPPDQGPPUHVSHFWLYHO\


'HWDLOLQJ)URPWKHDWWDFKHGGUDZLQJVLWFDQEHVHHQWKDWVLPLODUEDUOD\RXWVKDYHEHHQ
DGRSWHGIRUERWKFRGHV$OWKRXJK(&ODSVDUHVOLJKWO\JUHDWHUPDLQWRSVWHHOFXUWDLOPHQW
SRLQWVKDYHEHHQPDLQWDLQHGDWDVWDQGDUG/WKHDPRXQWRIVSDQWRSVWHHOSURYLGHG
EHLQJGHWHUPLQHGIURPWKDWUHTXLUHGDW/7KHSULQFLSOHRISURYLGLQJWZRWKLUGVRI
FROXPQKHDGVWHHOZLWKLQWKHFHQWUDOKDOIRIFROXPQVWULSVKDVDOVREHHQPDLQWDLQHG
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

1HLWKHUFRGHVKRZVDUHTXLUHPHQWIRUDJUHDWPDQ\OLQNVDWFROXPQKHDGVDVSXQFKLQJ
VKHDULVQRWUHDOO\FULWLFDODWWKHVHOHFWHGVODEGHSWKV7KHDUUDQJHPHQWVRIOLQNVDUH
KRZHYHUYHU\GLIIHUHQWZLWKUHFWDQJXODUSHULPHWHUVWR%6DQGZLWKUDGLDORUEHDP
W\SHVSXUVWR(&

0DWHULDOTXDQWLWLHV

&RQFUHWH 6RIILW 9HUWLFDO 5HEDU &RVW


6/$%6
P IRUPVP IRUPVP 7RQQHV …
(&     
%6     

7KLVLVDQH[WUHPHO\GLVDSSRLQWLQJRXWFRPHDVLWVKRZVDUHGXFWLRQLQVODEFRQVWUXFWLRQ
FRVWIRUWKHQHZFRGHRIRQO\,IHTXDWLRQZHUHWRKDYHEHHQXVHGLQVWHDGRI
HTXDWLRQVDDQGEWKH(&GHVLJQZRXOGEHWKHPRUHH[SHQVLYH VHHEHORZ 
7KHUHTXLUHPHQWWRLQFOXGHWKHDGMDFHQWVSDQVORDGLQJSDWWHUQDQGWKHWKLQQHUVODEDUH
WKHSULQFLSDOUHDVRQVIRUWKH(&UHLQIRUFHPHQWTXDQWLWLHVEHLQJKLJKHU

7KHWDEOHEHORZJLYHVDQLQGLFDWLRQRIWKHGLIIHUHQWUHODWLRQVKLSEHWZHHQWRSDQGERWWRP
UHLQIRUFHPHQW
%WPVWHHO 7RSVWHHO
7<3,&$/)/225
7RQQHV 7RQQHV
(&  
%6  

%HFDXVHFRVWVEHWZHHQWKHWZRFRGHVZHUHVRFORVHDQHVWLPDWHKDVEHHQPDGHRIWKH
HIIHFWVRIXVLQJHTXDWLRQDVRSSRVHGWRDDQGEDQGRIRPLWWLQJWKHDGMDFHQW
VSDQVORDGFDVH7KHVHFRPSDULVRQVDUHVXPPDULVHGEHORZ

&RVW
(& $GMDFHQW 6ODEK &RQFUHWH 6RIILW 9HUWLFDO 5HEDU &RVW UHODWLYHWR
6/$%6
6SDQV" PP P IRUPVP IRUPVP 7RQQHV … %6
(& <HV       
FODXVH
1R       

(&
<HV       
FODXVHV
DDQG
1R       
E


%HDPV
7KHWZREHDPVGRQRWKDYHWRZRUNYHU\KDUG7KH\GROLWWOHPRUHWKDQSURYLGHH[WUD
VWLIIQHVVZKHUHUHTXLUHG$VDUHVXOWUHLQIRUFHPHQWLVPRUHRUOHVVQRPLQDOWRERWKFRGHV
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

&ROXPQV
/RDGWDNHGRZQ $OWKRXJKWKH(&VHUYLFHORDGLQJIRUDVLQJOHIORRULVDURXQGOHVV
WKDQIRU%6 UHIHUHQFHFROXPQ' WKHDFFXPXODWHGVHUYLFHORDGDWEDVHOHYHOLV
PRUHEHFDXVHWKH%6LPSRVHGORDGUHGXFWLRQVDUHIDUJUHDWHU$OVRWKH(&DFFXPXODWHG
8/6ORDGZKLFKREYLRXVO\JRYHUQVUHLQIRUFHPHQWOHYHOVLVRQO\OHVVWKDQ%6LQ
VSLWHRIWKHVLQJOHIORRUWRWDOEHLQJQHDUO\OHVV,QDQXWVKHOOWKHUHVWULFWLYH(XURFRGH
LPSRVHGORDGUHGXFWLRQPHWKRGKDVHDWHQXSQHDUO\KDOIRIWKHDGYDQWDJHREWDLQHGIURP
ORZHUγIDFWRUVDQGFDQDFWXDOO\JLYHPRUH6/6ORDGWRIRXQGDWLRQV

6L]LQJ ,QWKLVEXLOGLQJFROXPQVL]HVDUHJRYHUQHGE\WKHPD[LPXPDPRXQWRI
YHUWLFDOUHLQIRUFHPHQWSHUPLWWHGE\HDFKFRGH7KH%6XSSHUOLPLWRI DW
ODSV KDVVHHPHGWRZRUNZHOOIRUPDQ\\HDUVEXWWR(&WKHJHQHUDOOLPLWRIRQO\KDV
EHHQWDNHQ7KLVVHHPVXQIDLUO\UHVWULFWLYHDQGDVDUHVXOWFROXPQVL]HVDUHH[WUHPHO\
VLPLODULQERWKVROXWLRQV7KHFRGHGRHVSHUPLWWKHOLPLWWREHH[FHHGHGLQFHUWDLQ
FLUFXPVWDQFHVEXWLWLVOLNHO\WKDWGHVLJQHUVZLOOEHYHU\UHOXFWDQWWRH[FHHGWKLVOLPLW
XQOHVVVSHFLILFJXLGDQFHLVJLYHQLQUHFRJQLVHGSXEOLFDWLRQV

'HWDLOLQJ (&FROXPQODSVDUHDURXQGORQJHUWKDQLQ%67KHUHLVDOVRD
UHTXLUHPHQWWRUHGXFHOLQNVSDFLQJDWODSVDQGFORVHWRMRLQWV2WKHUZLVHPHWKRGVDUHYHU\
VLPLODU

0DWHULDOTXDQWLWLHV

&RQFUHWH 9HUWLFDO 5HEDU &RVW


&2/8016
 
P IRUPVP 7RQQHV …
(&    
%6    

7KLVDJDLQLVDGLVDSSRLQWLQJRXWFRPHDVWKHGLIIHUHQFHLQFRVWLVRQO\

6KHDUZDOOV
$QDO\VLV 7KHUHDUHTXLWHVWULNLQJGLIIHUHQFHVKHUH7R%6KRUL]RQWDOIRUFHVDUH
WDNHQDVWKHPD[LPXPRIZLQGORDGDQGRIGHDGORDG+RZHYHUZLWK(&KRUL]RQWDO
ORDGVWRDOORZIRULPSHUIHFWLRQVDUHDGGHGWRZLQGORDGVERWKEHLQJPRGLILHGE\Dψ
IDFWRU:DOOVDUHPPWKLFNIRUERWKVROXWLRQVEXWEHFDXVHRIWKLVVOLJKWO\LQFUHDVHG
KRUL]RQWDOORDGLQJDQGDOVREHFDXVHRIVOLJKWO\OHVVGHDGORDGIURPWKHVODEVJUHDWHU
WHQVLRQVGHYHORSUHTXLULQJPRUHUHLQIRUFHPHQWDWORZHUOHYHOV


0DWHULDOTXDQWLWLHV

6+($5 &RQFUHWH 6RIILW 9HUWLFDO 5HEDU &RVW


:$//6
P IRUPVP IRUPVP 7RQQHV …
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

(&     


%6     

+HUHWKH%6VROXWLRQLVFKHDSHU

5HWDLQLQJZDOOV
+HUHPHWKRGVDUHYHU\VLPLODUGLIIHUHQFHVEHLQJGXHPDLQO\WRLQWHQVLW\RIYHUWLFDOORDGLQJ
(&UHTXLUHVVOLJKWO\OHVVORQJLWXGLQDOVWHHOEXWWKLVLVPRUHWKDQRIIVHWE\WKHLQFUHDVHLQ
EDVHVL]H

5(7$,1,1* &RQFUHWH 9HUWLFDO 5HEDU ([FDYDWH &RVW


:$//6
P IRUPVP 7RQQHV P …
(&     
%6     

)RXQGDWLRQEDVHV
$OWKRXJKWKH(&YHUWLFDOORDGVDW8/6DUHDOLWWOHOHVVWKDQIRU%6SDGVWHQGHGWR
EHPDUJLQDOO\PRUHKHDYLO\UHLQIRUFHG7KHUHDVRQVIRUWKLVDUHTXLWHFRPSOH[DQGZLOO
UHTXLUHIXUWKHUFRQVLGHUDWLRQ

3$' &RQFUHWH 5HEDU ([FDYDWH &RVW


%$6(6
P 7RQQHV P …
(&    
%6    

2YHUDOOFRQVWUXFWLRQFRVWV

29(5$// 6RIILW 9HUWLFDO


&RQFUHWH 5HEDU ([FDYDWH 7RWDO
… IRUPZRUN IRUPZRUN
(&      
%6      

7KLVVKRZVDQRYHUDOO(&VDYLQJRIRQO\


&RQFOXVLRQV

 7KHIDFWWKDWRYHUDOOFRQVWUXFWLRQFRVWVDUHDOPRVWLGHQWLFDOLVIHOWWREHYHU\
GLVWXUELQJSDUWLFXODUO\DVWKHDGYDQWDJHVRIXVLQJHTXDWLRQVDDQGEKDYH
EHHQWDNHQ)RUWKLVVWUXFWXUHWKHXVHRI(XURFRGHZRXOGKDYHEHHQXSWR
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

PRUHH[SHQVLYHLIHTXDWLRQKDGEHHQHPSOR\HG7KHDGRSWLRQRIDQHZGHVLJQ
FRGHVKRXOGVKRZDVWHSIRUZDUGLQWHUPVRIHFRQRP\

 ,WLVIHOWWREHLPSHUDWLYHWKDWWKH1DWLRQDO$QQH[WR(1VKRXOGSHUPLWWKHXVHRI
HTXDWLRQVDDQGE7KHVHHTXDWLRQVZHUHVXUHO\FRPSLOHGDVDUHVXOWRI
H[WHQVLYHVWDWLVWLFDOUHVHDUFKVRGHVLJQHUVVKRXOGEHJLYHQWKHRSSRUWXQLW\WRWDNH
DGYDQWDJHRIWKHP

 $QRWKHUUHDVRQIRUWKHKLJKFRVWRIWKH(&VODEVLQWKLVGHVLJQVWXG\LVWKH
LQFUHDVHGDPRXQWRIFROXPQKHDGUHLQIRUFHPHQWJHQHUDWHGE\WKHLQFOXVLRQRIWKH
DGMDFHQWVSDQVORDGFDVH1RWZLWKVWDQGLQJP\HDUOLHUYLHZVUHJDUGLQJSDWWHUQ
ORDGLQJWKLVVWXG\KDVQRZOHDGPHWRXQGHUVWDQGWKHLPSRUWDQFHRIRPLWWLQJWKH
UHTXLUHPHQWWRLQFOXGHWKLVORDGFDVHH[FHSWLQXQXVXDOFLUFXPVWDQFHV HJYHU\
KLJKSRLQWRUOLQHORDGV ZKHUHDPRUHGHWDLOHGH[DPLQDWLRQRIUHOHYDQWORDG
FRPELQDWLRQVPD\EHUHTXLUHG

 7KH1DWLRQDO$QQH[WR(&DQGWHFKQLFDOJXLGDQFHOLWHUDWXUHVKRXOGLGHDOO\GHILQH
WKHFLUFXPVWDQFHVLQZKLFKWKHPDLQVWHHOOLPLWLQFROXPQVPD\EHH[FHHGHG
DQGE\KRZPXFK

5RG:HEVWHU&(QJ),6WUXFW(

$XJXVW


Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.
Comparative Design Study
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

to
EC2 & BS8110
of a
Typical RC Framed Structure

Calculations
to
Eurocode 2

July 2002
Project name Project No

CiD
EC2 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Typical Floor GA 1
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design May 2002
RMW

2 4 6
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

A
400 sq 400 sq 350 f

3600 1668

B
500 sq 500 sq 400 sq
Line of zero rotation

Allow for one 150 sq hole


at centre of face of
internal columns

625
350 f
260 Solid slab C

D
500 sq

In Ec2 FE analysis, assume


fctm = value at10 days.
Composite f values from
Annex B of EC2. 985
325

E
450 sq 500 sq 400 sq

350 f
350 f
F

1 3 5
1 hour fire period external exposure = severe internal exposure = moderate.
Slabs, beams and walls - C32/40 concrete. All reinforcement fyk = 500 N/mm² (high bond).
Imposed dead load = 1.0 kN/m² on floors and roof (h same as floors).
Perimeter cladding = 1.0 kN/m² on external elevation.
Superimposed load = (4+1) kN/m² on floors, 1.5 kN/m² on roof.
Project name Project No

CiD
EC2 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Basement GA 2
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design May 2002
RMW

2 4 6
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

3600 7200 5050

A
1800 x 350 base
300 wall

4750
B

3200 sq x 900 3050 sq x 800


base base

1800 x 350 base


Retaining walls resisting

8400
granular backfill with 10

300 wall
kN/m² surcharge and
water pressure to 1m
above basement level. 1450
C

2125
D

3600 sq x 1100
base

8400
2400 x 4200
x 600 base

2400 x 500 base


300 wall
E
8400 6350 2300
4370

1 3 5
Pilecaps and ground bearing slab not included in design.
Ground bearing slab assumed to be 225 thick with 2.5 kN/m² imposed load.
Max ground bearing pressure taken as 600 kN/m².
Foundations & retaining walls - C32/40 concrete - 40mm cover.
Columns and core walls - C48/60 concrete (reducing to 32/40) - 1 hour fire period.
Project name Project No

CiD
EC2 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Typical Floor 3
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design May 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Typical Floor Loading


260 Slab = 6.50 at 25 kN/m³ to EN 1991
Applied Dead = 1.00
7.50 = Gk
Partitions = 1.00
Imposed = 4.00 Qk = 5.00 kN/m²
Total = 12.50 kN/m² characteristic

Quasi permant loading y2 = 0.3 from EN 1990 (office loading)


QP UD load = 7.5 + 0.3 x 5 = 9.00 kN/m²

Perimeter line load from cladding = 3.6 kN/m

CLAUSES 6.10a & 6.10b of EN 1990 y0 = 0.7


x = 0.85
to 6.10a, ultimate UDL = 1.35 x 7.5 + 0.7 x 1.5 x 5 = 15.38
to 6.10b, ultimate UDL = 1.35 x 0.85 x 7.5 + 1.5 x 5 = 16.11
Therefore, Clause 6.10b will control at ULS
IE 1.15 Gk + 1.5Qk
Parameters for FE Analysis
fck = 32 N/mm² fcm28 = fck + 8 = 40 N/mm²
1/3
Ecm28 = 1.05 x 9.5 x 40 = 34.114 kN/mm²
2/3
from Table 3.1, fctm = 0.3 fck = 3.0238 N/mm²
Assuming first cracking at 10 days,
fctm7 = Exp{0.25[1-Ö(28/10)]} x fctm = 2.5553 N/mm² (3.4)

LOADING SEQUENCE kN/m² at days


Self weight 6.50 10
Applied dead 2.00 60
Permanent imposed 1.20 60
Variable load 2.80 ¥
COMPOSITE E and f VALUES
Annex B.1
Longterm QP Longterm Total
Ø0 Et Ø0 Et
Self weight 2.63 9.39 2.63 9.39
Applied dead 1.87 11.88 1.87 11.88 To 60 days
Permanent imposed 1.87 11.88 1.87 11.88 SW + applied dead
Variable load 0 36.02 Ø (t,t0) Et
Composite 2.38 10.09 1.84 12.03 1.21 15.47
Project name Project No

CiD
EC2 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Typical Floor 4
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design May 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

1 2 3 4

Regions for
pattern loading

5 8
6 7

9 10 11

14
12 13

IMPOSED LOADS
Showing pattern loading regions FEM-Design
Project name Project No

CiD
EC2 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Typical Floor 5
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design May 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

ULS LOADING PATTERNS


1.15Gk on all spans
plus 1.5Qk on alternate, adjacent spans
in both directions.

SLS LOADINGS
1.0 Gk on all spans
QP run with 0.3Qk, & f = 2.38 (for check against L/250)
Full run with 1.0Qk & f = 1.84 (total long-term)
Final run with Qk = 0 & f = 1.21 (at erection of cladding)

DEAD LOADS
Perimeter line loading = 3.6 kN/m2 FEM-Design
Project name Project No

CiD
EC2 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Typical Floor 6
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design May 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Line of zero rotation

Areas over all columns


modelled as deep regions

FEM-Design
FINITE ELEMENT MESH
Project name Project No

CiD
EC2 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Typical Floor 7
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design May 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Secion B

3200
2800
2400
2000
1600
1200
WHITE = nominal steel 800
(T12 @ 275) 400
0
Secion A

FEM-Design
As REQUIRED BTM X
Project name Project No

CiD
EC2 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Typical Floor 8
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design May 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Section D

WHITE = nominal steel


(T12 @ 275)

Sectio
nC

FEM-Design
As REQUIRED BTM Y
Project name Project No

CiD
EC2 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Typical Floor 9
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design May 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Section H
Section E

Section G

WHITE = nominal steel


(T12 @ 275)
Section F

FEM-Design
As REQUIRED TOP X
Project name Project No

CiD
EC2 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Typical Floor 10
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design May 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Section J

WHITE = nominal steel


(T12 @ 275)

Section K

Section L

FEM-Design
As REQUIRED TOP Y
Project name Project No

CiD
EC2 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Typical Floor 11
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design May 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

T16 @ 250 T16 @ 225 T12 @ 200 T20 @ 150 T12 @ 225 T12 @ 200 T12 @ 225
= 1084 = 894 = 565 = 2094 = 503 = 565 = 503

Section B
Section A

Bottom steel X direction

T12 @ 175 T12 @ 250 T12 @ 275


= 646 = 452 = 411

T12 @ 200
= 565
T12 @ 175 T12 @ 250
= 646 = 452
T16 @ 150
= 1340
Section C
Section D

Bottom steel Y direction


Project name Project No

CiD
EC2 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Typical Floor 12
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design May 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

T20 @ 70
9 T20 10 T20 = 4488
in 800 in 925
=3534 =3396 T20 @ 100
= 3142
T16 @ 125
= 1608
T12 @275 T20 @ 125
= 411 = 2513 T20 @ 225 T16 @ 250
= 1396 = 804
T12 @ 250 T12 @ 225
= 452 = 503
Section F Section E

T20@80
= 3927 T20@90
= 3491
T20@110
= 2856 T20@125
T16@125
= 2513
= 1608
T20@200
= 1571
T20@150
= 2094 T20@175
T20@225 = 1795
T16@250 T16@250
= 1396
= 804 = 804

T12@175 T12@275 T12@275 T12@275


= 646 = 411 = 411 = 411

Section G

Top steel X direction


Project name Project No

CiD
EC2 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Typical Floor 13
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design May 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

T12@150
= 754
T16@150 T16@150
= 1340 = 1340

T12@275 T12@275
= 411 = 411

Section H
Top steel X direction

T20@100 T20@100
= 3142 = 3142

T16@200
T20@200 T20@200
= 1005
= 1571 = 1571
T12@275 T12@275 T12@275
= 411 = 411 = 411

Section J
Top steel Y direction
Project name Project No

CiD
EC2 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Typical Floor 14
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design May 2002
RMW

5178
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

T20@80 T20@150
= 3927 = 2094

T20@150
= 2094

T16@150
= 1340

T12@200 T12@175 T12@250


= 565 = 646 = 452

Section K
6049

T20@75
T20@125
= 4189
= 2513

T20@150
= 2094

T20@250
T12@275
= 1257
= 411

Section L
Top steel Y direction
Project name Project No

CiD
EC2 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Typical Floor 15
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design May 2002
RMW
-6.1
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

-21.9

-27.1
4900

2 x 4900/250 = 39.2
> 27.1 - 0.3 = 26.8 mm

-0.3

All QP deflections are


within L/250 limit

Quasi Permanent Defelections


with Applied Reinforcement
Project name Project No

CiD
EC2 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Typical Floor 16
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design May 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Max = 15.5 - 0.2 = 15.3 mm

Dead Only Defelections


with Applied Reinforcement
Project name Project No

CiD
EC2 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Typical Floor 17
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design May 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Max D affecting cladding


= 34.9 - 15.3 = 19.6 mm
= L / 500 OK

Max = 35.1 - 0.2 = 34.9 mm

Total Load Defelections


with Applied Reinforcement
Project name Project No

CiD
EC2 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Typical Floor 18
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design May 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Full ULS Column Moments


with Applied Reinforcement
Project name Project No

CiD
EC2 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Typical Floor 19
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design May 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

132.2 116.6 79.1

385.7 346.1 205.2

151.8

162.5 11.8 25.4

502.4

124.9 17.6 20.8

250.7 358.0

211.3

137.2
79.5 Full ULS
Dead only

Column Reactions
Project name Project No

CiD
EC2 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Typical Floor 20
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design May 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Project EC2 Comparative Design REINFORCED CONCRETE COUNCIL


Client BRE Made by Date Page
Location Column D2 RMW 01-Jun-2002
PUNCHING SHEAR to pr EN 1992-1 : 2001 INTERNAL Checked Revision Job No
Originated from RCCen13.xls on CD © 2002 BCA for RCC COLUMN - 2156

MATERIALS fck N/mm


2
32 STATUS LEGEND
fyk N/mm
2
500 VALID DESIGN

DIMENSIONS A mm 500 E mm 250


B mm 500 F mm -75
G mm 150 H mm 150

LOADING VEd kN 1066.8 0 1364.0


ult UDL kN/m 2 16.13

SLAB h mm 260 dx mm 225 Asx mm /m


2
4189 in B + 6d
dy mm 205 Asy mm2/m 3927 in A + 6d
d mm 215 100rL % 1.888

RESULTS bVEd = 1226.8 kN


2
vRd,c = 0.9251 N/mm Equation (6.48)
At col. face, vEd = 3.073 N/mm2 At 2d perimeter, vED,red = 1.3239 N/mm
2

Uout required = 5364 mm Equation (6.55)

SOLUTION 6.22 (B)


12 link spurs of 3 T10 @ 155 36 links
.
St = 250 mm Sr = 155 mm
Asw/Sr req = 5.938 (6.53) & (9.11)
Asw/Sr prov = 6.081 mm
First link perimeter 105 mm from column face
Uout = 5440.7 mm > 5,364 mm

See GEOMETRY page for link locations. Plan


Some links shown may need to be re-located to avoid holes.

Punching at Column D2
B2 and B4 similar
Project name Project No

CiD
EC2 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Typical Floor 21
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design May 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Project EC2 Comparative Design REINFORCED CONCRETE COUNCIL

Client BRE Made by Date Page


Location Column A2 RMW 01-Jun-2002 1
PUNCHING SHEAR to prEN 1992-1 : 2001 EDGE Checked Revision Job No
Originated from RCCen13.xls on CD © 2002 BCA for RCC COLUMN 0 - 2156

MATERIALS fck N/mm


2
32 STATUS LEGEND
fyk N/mm2 500 VALID DESIGN

DIMENSIONS A mm 400 E mm 0
B mm 400 F mm -200
G mm 0
D mm 0 H mm 0

LOADING VEd kN 258.8 0 980


2
ult UDL kN/m 16.13

SLAB h mm 260 dx mm 225 Asx mm2/m 804 in B + 3d+D


dy mm 205 Asy mm2/m 1156 in A + 6d
d mm 215 100rL % 0.449

RESULTS bVEd = 362.3 kN vRd,c = 0.5731 N/mm2 Equation (6.48)


2
At col. face, vEd = 1.390 N/mm At 2d perimeter, vED,red = 0.6541 N/mm2
Uout required = 2101 mm Equation (6.55)

SOLUTION 6.22 (B)


9 link spurs of 3 T6 @ 160 36 links
#NUM!
St = 190 mm Sr = 160 mm
Asw/Sr req = 1.256 (6.53) & (9.11)
Asw/Sr prov = 1.590 mm
First link perimeter 105 mm from column fa ce
Uout = 3161.7 mm > 2,101 mm

See GEOMETRY page for link locations. Plan


Some links shown may need to be re-located to avoid holes.

Punching at Column A2
A4 similar - No links required at Column B6
Project name Project No

CiD
EC2 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Column Loads & Design 22
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Column Design Summary


H B
COLUMN D2 500 500 SW = 20.9

Axial Force Moments


Dead Imposed Service Ultimate M® M­ Rebar
523.3 97.8
Roof
reduction 0.0 621.1 748.5 19.0 126.0 6 T12
C32/40
523.3 97.8
th 523.3 326.0
8 floor
reduction 0.0 1470.4 1839.3 27.5 179.2 6 T12
C32/40
1046.6 423.8
th 523.3 326.0
7 floor
reduction 0.0 2319.7 2930.1 27.5 179.2 6 T12
C32/40
1569.8 749.9
523.3 326.0
6th floor
reduction 107.6 3061.4 3859.5 27.5 179.2 6 T16
C32/40
2093.1 968.3
523.3 326.0
5th floor
reduction 102.7 3808.0 4796.3 27.5 179.2 6 T32
C32/40
2616.4 1191.6
523.3 326.0
4th floor
reduction 100.7 4556.6 5736.0 27.5 179.2 6 T40
C32/40
3139.7 1416.9
rd 523.3 326.0
3 floor
reduction 99.8 5306.1 6677.1 27.5 179.2 10 T20
C48/60
3662.9 1643.2
523.3 326.0
2nd floor
reduction 99.2 6056.2 7619.1 27.5 179.2 10 T25
C48/60
4186.2 1870.0
st 523.3 326.0
1 floor
reduction 98.9 6806.6 8561.6 27.5 179.2 10 T32
C48/60
4709.5 2097.2
523.3 326.0
Ground floor
reduction 98.6 7557.3 9504.5 20.7 135.8 12 T32
C48/60
5232.8 2324.6

See reinforcement calculations on following sheets


Project name Project No

CiD
EC2 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Column Loads & Design 23
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW

Project EC2 Comparative Design Concrete Innovation & Design


Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Client BRE Made by Date Page


Location 500 x 500 Basement Columns RMW 6-Jun-02
SYMMETRICALLY REINFORCED RECTANGULAR COLUMN DESIGN, BENT ABOUT TWO
AXES TO prEN 1992-1 : 2001 Checked Revision Job No
Originated from RCCen53.xls on CD © 2002 BCA for RCC - 2156

MATERIALS
fck 48 N/mm² gs 1.15 Cover to link 30 mm
fyk 500 N/mm² gc 1.5 dg 20 mm
f 2.0 fef 1.0 Dc = 5 mm
SECTION
h 500 mm .
b 500 mm
with 3 bars per 500 face X X
and 5 bars per 500 face
ie. 500 x 500 columns with 12 bars

RESTRAINTS Storey Top Btm CONNECTING BEAMS/SLABS for slenderness


height (mm) Condition Condition Braced ? b (mm) h (mm) L (m)
X-AXIS 3600 F P Y Top West 8400 260 7.2
Y-AXIS 3600 F P Y Top East 8400 260 5.875
Top North 7200 260 8.4
Top South 5335 260 8.4
L (mm) L0 (mm) h0 (mm) Bottom West
X-AXIS 3340 2509 250 Bottom East
Y-AXIS 3340 2637 Bottom North
Bottom South

BAR ARRANGEMENTS BAR CENTRES (mm)


Bar Ø Asc % Link Ø 500 Face 500 Face Nuz (kN) Checks
T 32 3.86 8 196 98 9915 ok
T 25 2.36 8 200 100 8701 ok
T 20 1.51 6 204 102 8017 ok
T 16 0.97 6 206 103 7579 ok
T 12 0.54 6 208 104 7238 ok
T 10 0.38 6 209 105 7104 ok

LOADCASES AXIAL TOP MOMENTS (kNm) BTM MOMENTS (kNm)


N (kN) M0x M0y M0x M0y
D2 9504.5 20.7 135.8

DESIGN MOMENTS (kNm) X AXIS Y AXIS Biaxial Check


MEd x MRd x MEd y MRd y Equation (5.39) REBAR
D2 52.2 191.8 190.1 216.1 0.915 12 T32
#N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
#N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
#N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
#N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
#N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
Project name Project No

CiD
EC2 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Column Loads & Design 24
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW

Project EC2 Comparative Design Concrete Innovation & Design


Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Client BRE Made by Date Page


Location Column D2 RMW 6-Jun-02
SYMMETRICALLY REINFORCED RECTANGULAR COLUMN DESIGN, BENT ABOUT TWO
AXES TO prEN 1992-1 : 2001 Checked Revision Job No
Originated from RCCen53.xls on CD © 2002 BCA for RCC - 2156

MATERIALS
fck 48 N/mm² gs 1.15 Cover to link 30 mm
fyk 500 N/mm² gc 1.5 dg 20 mm
f 2.0 fef 1.0 Dc = 5 mm
SECTION
h 500 mm .
b 500 mm
with 3 bars per 500 face X X
and 4 bars per 500 face
ie. 500 x 500 columns with 10 bars

RESTRAINTS Storey Top Btm CONNECTING BEAMS/SLABS for slenderness


height (mm) Condition Condition Braced ? b (mm) h (mm) L (m)
X-AXIS 3600 F F Y Top West 8400 260 7.2
Y-AXIS 3600 F F Y Top East 8400 260 5.875
Top North 7200 260 8.4
Top South 5335 260 8.4
L (mm) L0 (mm) h0 (mm) Bottom West 8400 260 7.2
X-AXIS 3340 2375 250 Bottom East 8400 260 5.875
Y-AXIS 3340 2534 Bottom North 7200 260 8.4
Bottom South 5335 260 8.4

BAR ARRANGEMENTS BAR CENTRES (mm)


Bar Ø Asc % Link Ø 500 Face 500 Face Nuz (kN) Checks
T 32 3.22 8 196 131 9396 ok
T 25 1.96 8 200 133 8385 ok
T 20 1.26 6 204 136 7814 ok
T 16 0.80 6 206 137 7449 ok
T 12 0.45 6 208 139 7165 ok
T 10 0.31 6 209 139 7054 ok

LOADCASES AXIAL TOP MOMENTS (kNm) BTM MOMENTS (kNm)


N (kN) M0x M0y M0x M0y
Grnd - 1st 8561.6 27.5 179.2 27.5 179.2
1st - 2nd 7619.1 27.5 179.2 27.5 179.2
2nd - 3rd 6677.1 27.5 179.2 27.5 179.2

DESIGN MOMENTS (kNm) X AXIS Y AXIS Biaxial Check


MEd x MRd x MEd y MRd y Equation (5.39) REBAR
Grnd - 1st 61.4 276.3 215.4 286.7 0.707 10 T32
1st - 2nd 57.7 227.7 211.4 234.8 0.875 10 T25
2nd - 3rd 53.9 279.1 207.4 284.5 0.576 10 T20
#N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
#N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
#N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
Project name Project No

CiD
EC2 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Column Loads & Design 25
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW

Project EC2 Comparative Design Concrete Innovation & Design


Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Client BRE Made by Date Page


Location Column D2 RMW 6-Jun-02
SYMMETRICALLY REINFORCED RECTANGULAR COLUMN DESIGN, BENT ABOUT TWO
AXES TO prEN 1992-1 : 2001 Checked Revision Job No
Originated from RCCen53.xls on CD © 2002 BCA for RCC - 2156

MATERIALS
fck 32 N/mm² gs 1.15 Cover to link 30 mm
fyk 500 N/mm² gc 1.5 dg 20 mm
f 2.0 fef 1.0 Dc = 5 mm
SECTION
h 500 mm .
b 500 mm
with 2 bars per 500 face X X
and 3 bars per 500 face
ie. 500 x 500 columns with 6 bars

RESTRAINTS Storey Top Btm CONNECTING BEAMS/SLABS for slenderness


height (mm) Condition Condition Braced ? b (mm) h (mm) L (m)
X-AXIS 3600 F F Y Top West 8400 260 7.2
Y-AXIS 3600 F F Y Top East 8400 260 5.875
Top North 7200 260 8.4
Top South 5335 260 8.4
L (mm) L0 (mm) h0 (mm) Bottom West 8400 260 7.2
X-AXIS 3340 2375 250 Bottom East 8400 260 5.875
Y-AXIS 3340 2534 Bottom North 7200 260 8.4
Bottom South 5335 260 8.4

BAR ARRANGEMENTS BAR CENTRES (mm)


Bar Ø Asc % Link Ø 500 Face 500 Face Nuz (kN) Checks
T 40 3.02 10 380 190 7036 ok
T 32 1.93 8 392 196 6135 ok
T 25 1.18 8 399 200 5511 ok
T 20 0.75 6 408 204 5159 ok
T 16 0.48 6 412 206 4934 ok
T 12 0.27 6 416 208 4759 ok

LOADCASES AXIAL TOP MOMENTS (kNm) BTM MOMENTS (kNm)


N (kN) M0x M0y M0x M0y
3rd - 4th 5736 27.5 179.2 27.5 179.2
4th - 5th 4796.3 27.5 179.2 27.5 179.2
5th - 6th 3859.5 27.5 179.2 27.5 179.2
6th - 7th 2390.1 27.5 179.2 27.5 179.2
7th - 8th 1839.3 27.5 179.2 27.5 179.2
8th - roof 748.5 19.0 126.0 27.5 179.2

DESIGN MOMENTS (kNm) X AXIS Y AXIS Biaxial Check


MEd x MRd x MEd y MRd y Equation (5.39) REBAR
3rd - 4th 50.2 337.4 203.4 381.1 0.450 6 T40
4th - 5th 46.5 309.1 199.5 345.1 0.357 6 T32
5th - 6th 42.8 223.0 195.5 233.0 0.830 6 T16
6th - 7th 37.0 316.6 189.3 332.6 0.520 6 T12
7th - 8th 34.8 313.4 187.0 333.6 0.547 6 T12
8th - roof 27.5 212.8 179.2 217.1 0.933 6 T12
Project name Project No

CiD
EC2 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Column Loads & Design 26
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Column Design Summary


H B
COLUMN A2 & A4 400 400 SW = 13.4

Axial Force Moments


Dead Imposed Service Ultimate M® M­ Rebar
145.6 21.4
Roof
reduction 0.0 166.9 199.4 2.9 56.5 4 T16
C32/40
145.6 21.4
145.6 71.2
8th floor
reduction 0.0 383.7 473.6 4.2 82.4 4 T12
C32/40
291.1 92.5
145.6 71.2
7th floor
reduction 0.0 600.4 747.8 4.2 82.4 4 T12
C32/40
436.7 163.7
145.6 71.2
6th floor
reduction 23.5 793.6 986.7 4.2 82.4 4 T12
C32/40
582.2 211.4
145.6 71.2
5th floor
reduction 22.4 988.0 1227.2 4.2 82.4 4 T12
C32/40
727.8 260.2
145.6 71.2
4th floor
reduction 22.0 1182.7 1468.4 4.2 82.4 4 T12
C32/40
873.4 309.3
rd 145.6 71.2
3 floor
reduction 21.8 1377.7 1709.9 4.2 82.4 4 T12
C48/60
1018.9 358.7
145.6 71.2
2nd floor
reduction 21.7 1572.7 1951.6 4.2 82.4 4 T12
C48/60
1164.5 408.3
145.6 71.2
1st floor
reduction 21.6 1767.9 2193.3 4.2 82.4 4 T12
C48/60
1310.0 457.9
145.6 71.2
Ground floor reduction 21.5 1963.1 2435.2
1455.6 507.5
Project name Project No

CiD
EC2 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Column Loads & Design 27
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Column Design Summary


H B
COLUMN B2 500 500 SW = 20.9

Axial Force Moments


Dead Imposed Service Ultimate M® M­ Rebar
406.6 77.0
Roof
reduction 0.0 483.5 583.0 12.2 156.7 6 T20
C32/40
406.6 77.0
th 406.6 256.6
8 floor
reduction 0.0 1146.7 1435.4 17.4 226.3 6 T12
C32/40
813.2 333.5
th 406.6 256.6
7 floor
reduction 0.0 1809.8 2287.8 17.4 226.3 6 T12
C32/40
1219.7 590.1
th 406.6 256.6
6 floor
reduction 84.7 2388.3 3013.2 17.4 226.3 6 T12
C32/40
1626.3 762.0
th 406.6 256.6
5 floor
reduction 80.8 2970.6 3744.4 17.4 226.3 6 T16
C32/40
2032.9 937.7
th 406.6 256.6
4 floor
reduction 79.3 3554.5 4477.9 17.4 226.3 6 T25
C32/40
2439.5 1115.0
rd 406.6 256.6
3 floor
reduction 78.5 4139.1 5212.5 17.4 226.3 6 T12
C48/60
2846.0 1293.1
nd 406.6 256.6
2 floor
reduction 78.1 4724.2 5947.9 17.4 226.3 6 T16
C48/60
3252.6 1471.6
st 406.6 256.6
1 floor
reduction 77.8 5309.5 6683.6 17.4 226.3 6 T25
C48/60
3659.2 1650.3
406.6 256.6
Ground floor
reduction 77.6 5895.0 7419.6 13.2 170.8 6 T32
C48/60
4065.8 1829.3
Project name Project No

CiD
EC2 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Column Loads & Design 28
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Column Design Summary


H B
COLUMN B4 500 500 SW = 20.9

Axial Force Moments


Dead Imposed Service Ultimate M® M­ Rebar
367.0 69.6
Roof
reduction 0.0 436.6 526.4 77.6 150.2 4 T32
C32/40
367.0 69.6
th 367.0 231.9
8 floor
reduction 0.0 1035.5 1296.3 111.7 216.0 4 T20
C32/40
734.0 301.5
th 367.0 231.9
7 floor
reduction 0.0 1634.3 2066.2 111.7 216.0 4 T16
C32/40
1100.9 533.4
th 367.0 231.9
6 floor
reduction 76.5 2156.7 2721.3 111.7 216.0 4 T16
C32/40
1467.9 688.8
367.0 231.9
5th floor
reduction 73.1 2682.6 3381.6 111.7 216.0 4 T20
C32/40
1834.9 847.7
th 367.0 231.9
4 floor
reduction 71.7 3209.8 4044.0 111.7 216.0 4 T32
C32/40
2201.9 1007.9
rd 367.0 231.9
3 floor
reduction 71.0 3737.7 4707.5 111.7 216.0 4 T16
C48/60
2568.8 1168.9
nd 367.0 231.9
2 floor
reduction 70.6 4266.0 5371.5 111.7 216.0 4 T16
C48/60
2935.8 1330.2
st 367.0 231.9
1 floor
reduction 70.3 4794.6 6036.0 111.7 216.0 4 T25
C48/60
3302.8 1491.8
367.0 231.9
Ground floor
reduction 70.2 5323.4 6700.6 84.4 163.2 4 T25
C48/60
3669.8 1653.6
Project name Project No

CiD
EC2 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Column Loads & Design 29
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Column Design Summary


H B
COLUMN B6 400 400 SW = 13.4

Axial Force Moments


Dead Imposed Service Ultimate M® M­ Rebar
218.6 33.8
Roof
reduction 0.0 252.3 302.0 24.8 45.7 4 T16
C32/40
218.6 33.8
218.6 112.6
8th floor
reduction 0.0 583.5 722.3 35.8 66.6 4 T12
C32/40
437.1 146.4
th 218.6 112.6
7 floor
reduction 0.0 914.7 1142.5 35.8 66.6 4 T12
C32/40
655.7 259.0
th 218.6 112.6
6 floor
reduction 37.2 1208.7 1507.1 35.8 66.6 4 T12
C32/40
874.2 334.5
218.6 112.6
5th floor
reduction 35.5 1504.4 1874.1 35.8 66.6 4 T12
C32/40
1092.8 411.6
th 218.6 112.6
4 floor
reduction 34.8 1800.8 2242.2 35.8 66.6 4 T12
C32/40
1311.4 489.4
rd 218.6 112.6
3 floor
reduction 34.5 2097.5 2610.8 35.8 66.6 4 T12
C48/60
1529.9 567.6
218.6 112.6
2nd floor
reduction 34.3 2394.4 2979.6 35.8 66.6 4 T12
C48/60
1748.5 645.9
st 218.6 112.6
1 floor
reduction 34.1 2691.4 3348.7 35.8 66.6 4 T16
C48/60
1967.0 724.4
218.6 112.6
Ground floor reduction 34.1 2988.5 3717.8
2185.6 802.9
Project name Project No

CiD
EC2 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Column Loads & Design 30
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Column Design Summary


H B
COLUMN E1 450 450 SW = 16.9

Axial Force Moments


Dead Imposed Service Ultimate M® M­ Rebar
267.6 45.9
Roof
reduction 0.0 313.5 376.6 117.8 274.7 6 T40
C32/40
267.6 45.9
267.6 152.9
8th floor
reduction 0.0 734.0 913.7 165.6 390.1 6 T40
C32/40
535.2 198.8
th 267.6 152.9
7 floor
reduction 0.0 1154.6 1450.9 165.6 390.1 6 T32
C32/40
802.8 351.7
th 267.6 152.9
6 floor
reduction 50.5 1524.6 1912.3 165.6 390.1 6 T40
C32/40
1070.4 454.2
267.6 152.9
5th floor
reduction 48.2 1897.0 2377.2 165.6 390.1 6 T40
C32/40
1338.0 559.0
th 267.6 152.9
4 floor
reduction 47.3 2270.3 2843.5 165.6 390.1 6 T40
C32/40
1605.7 664.6
rd 267.6 152.9
3 floor
reduction 46.8 2644.0 3310.4 165.6 390.1 6 T32
C48/60
1873.3 770.8
267.6 152.9
2nd floor
reduction 46.5 3018.0 3777.7 165.6 390.1 6 T32
C48/60
2140.9 877.2
st 267.6 152.9
1 floor
reduction 46.4 3392.2 4245.3 165.6 390.1 6 T32
C48/60
2408.5 983.7
267.6 152.9
Ground floor reduction 46.3 3766.5 4713.1
2676.1 1090.4
Project name Project No

CiD
EC2 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Column Loads & Design 31
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Column Design Summary


H B
COLUMN E3 500 500 SW = 20.9

Axial Force Moments


Dead Imposed Service Ultimate M® M­ Rebar
378.9 68.7
Roof
reduction 0.0 447.6 538.8 83.5 123.6 4 T32
C32/40
378.9 68.7
378.9 229.0
8th floor
reduction 0.0 1055.5 1318.0 120.4 179.0 4 T16
C32/40
757.8 297.7
th 378.9 229.0
7 floor
reduction 0.0 1663.3 2097.2 120.4 179.0 4 T16
C32/40
1136.6 526.7
th 378.9 229.0
6 floor
reduction 75.6 2195.6 2763.0 120.4 179.0 4 T16
C32/40
1515.5 680.1
378.9 229.0
5th floor
reduction 72.1 2731.4 3434.0 120.4 179.0 4 T20
C32/40
1894.4 837.0
th 378.9 229.0
4 floor
reduction 70.8 3268.5 4107.1 120.4 179.0 4 T25
C32/40
2273.3 995.2
rd 378.9 229.0
3 floor
reduction 70.1 3806.3 4781.2 120.4 179.0 4 T16
C48/60
2652.1 1154.2
378.9 229.0
2nd floor
reduction 69.7 4344.5 5455.9 120.4 179.0 4 T16
C48/60
3031.0 1313.5
st 378.9 229.0
1 floor
reduction 69.4 4882.9 6130.9 120.4 179.0 4 T25
C48/60
3409.9 1473.0
378.9 229.0
Ground floor reduction 69.3 5421.5 6806.2
3788.8 1632.8
Project name Project No

CiD
EC2 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Column Loads & Design 32
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Column Design Summary


H B
COLUMN E5 400 400 SW = 13.4

Axial Force Moments


Dead Imposed Service Ultimate M® M­ Rebar
224.7 30.4
Roof
reduction 0.0 255.1 304.0 1.2 32.6 4 T12
C32/40
224.7 30.4
224.7 101.5
8th floor
reduction 0.0 581.2 714.6 1.8 47.4 4 T12
C32/40
449.3 131.9
th 224.7 101.5
7 floor
reduction 0.0 907.4 1125.1 1.8 47.4 4 T12
C32/40
674.0 233.4
th 224.7 101.5
6 floor
reduction 33.5 1200.0 1485.5 1.8 47.4 4 T12
C32/40
898.6 301.4
224.7 101.5
5th floor
reduction 32.0 1494.2 1848.1 1.8 47.4 4 T12
C32/40
1123.3 370.9
th 224.7 101.5
4 floor
reduction 31.4 1788.9 2211.6 1.8 47.4 4 T12
C32/40
1348.0 441.0
rd 224.7 101.5
3 floor
reduction 31.0 2084.0 2575.6 1.8 47.4 4 T12
C48/60
1572.6 511.4
224.7 101.5
2nd floor
reduction 30.9 2379.3 2939.9 1.8 47.4 4 T12
C48/60
1797.3 582.0
st 224.7 101.5
1 floor
reduction 30.8 2674.6 3304.3 1.8 47.4 4 T12
C48/60
2021.9 652.7
224.7 101.5
Ground floor reduction 30.7 2970.1 3668.8
2246.6 723.5
Project name Project No

CiD
EC2 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Column Loads & Design 33
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Column Design Summary


Diameter
COLUMN A6 350 SW = 8.0

Axial Force Moment


Dead Imposed Service Ultimate M Rebar
87.1 12.5
Roof
reduction 0.0 99.7 119.0 23.8 6 T12
C32/40
87.1 12.5
87.1 41.8
8th floor
reduction 0.0 228.6 281.8 34.8 6 T12
C32/40
174.3 54.3
87.1 41.8
7th floor
reduction 0.0 357.4 444.7 34.8 6 T12
C32/40
261.4 96.0
th 87.1 41.8
6 floor
reduction 13.8 472.6 586.8 34.8 6 T12
C32/40
348.5 124.0
87.1 41.8
5th floor
reduction 13.2 588.3 729.9 34.8 6 T12
C32/40
435.7 152.6
th 87.1 41.8
4 floor
reduction 12.9 704.3 873.4 34.8 6 T12
C32/40
522.8 181.5
rd 87.1 41.8
3 floor
reduction 12.8 820.4 1017.1 34.8 6 T12
C48/60
609.9 210.5
nd 87.1 41.8
2 floor
reduction 12.7 936.6 1160.9 34.8 6 T12
C48/60
697.1 239.5
st 87.1 41.8
1 floor
reduction 12.7 1052.8 1304.7 34.8 6 T12
C48/60
784.2 268.6
87.1 41.8
Ground floor reduction 12.6 1169.1 1448.6
871.3 297.7
Project name Project No

CiD
EC2 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Column Loads & Design 34
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Column Design Summary


Diameter
COLUMN C6 350 SW = 8.0

Axial Force Moment


Dead Imposed Service Ultimate M Rebar
159.8 26.4
Roof
reduction 0.0 186.2 223.4 93.9 6 T20
C32/40
159.8 26.4
159.8 87.9
8th floor
reduction 0.0 433.9 539.0 116.6 6 T20
C32/40
319.7 114.3
159.8 87.9
7th floor
reduction 0.0 681.6 854.6 116.6 6 T20
C32/40
479.5 202.1
th 159.8 87.9
6 floor
reduction 29.0 900.4 1126.8 116.6 6 T25
C32/40
639.3 261.0
159.8 87.9
5th floor
reduction 27.7 1120.4 1400.9 116.6 6 T25
C32/40
799.2 321.2
th 159.8 87.9
4 floor
reduction 27.2 1341.0 1675.8 116.6 6 T32
C32/40
959.0 382.0
rd 159.8 87.9
3 floor
reduction 26.9 1561.8 1951.1 116.6 6 T20
C48/60
1118.8 442.9
nd 159.8 87.9
2 floor
reduction 26.7 1782.8 2226.6 116.6 6 T25
C48/60
1278.7 504.1
st 159.8 87.9
1 floor
reduction 26.6 2003.8 2502.3 116.6 6 T25
C48/60
1438.5 565.3
159.8 87.9
Ground floor reduction 26.6 2225.0 2778.0
1598.3 626.6
Project name Project No

CiD
EC2 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Column Loads & Design 35
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Column Design Summary


Diameter
COLUMN F1 350 SW = 8.0

Axial Force Moment


Dead Imposed Service Ultimate M Rebar
87.5 11.9
Roof
reduction 0.0 99.4 118.5 105.9 6 T25
C32/40
87.5 11.9
87.5 39.6
8th floor
reduction 0.0 226.5 278.5 153.2 6 T32
C32/40
175.1 51.5
87.5 39.6
7th floor
reduction 0.0 353.6 438.6 153.2 6 T32
C32/40
262.6 91.0
87.5 39.6
6th floor
reduction 13.1 467.7 579.0 153.2 6 T32
C32/40
350.1 117.6
th 87.5 39.6
5 floor
reduction 12.5 582.3 720.3 153.2 6 T32
C32/40
437.7 144.7
87.5 39.6
4th floor
reduction 12.2 697.2 862.0 153.2 6 T32
C32/40
525.2 172.0
rd 87.5 39.6
3 floor
reduction 12.1 812.2 1003.9 153.2 6 T25
C48/60
612.7 199.5
87.5 39.6
2nd floor
reduction 12.0 927.3 1145.9 153.2 6 T20
C48/60
700.3 227.0
st 87.5 39.6
1 floor
reduction 12.0 1042.4 1287.9 153.2 6 T25
C48/60
787.8 254.6
87.5 39.6
Ground floor reduction 12.0 1157.6 1430.0
875.3 282.2
Project name Project No

CiD
EC2 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Column Loads & Design 36
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Column Design Summary


Diameter
COLUMN F3 350 SW = 8.0

Axial Force Moment


Dead Imposed Service Ultimate M Rebar
145.2 21.0
Roof
reduction 0.0 166.3 198.6 54.3 6 T12
C32/40
145.2 21.0
145.2 70.1
8th floor
reduction 0.0 381.6 470.7 79.4 6 T16
C32/40
290.5 91.1
145.2 70.1
7th floor
reduction 0.0 596.9 742.8 79.4 6 T16
C32/40
435.7 161.2
145.2 70.1
6th floor
reduction 23.1 789.1 980.3 79.4 6 T16
C32/40
580.9 208.1
th 145.2 70.1
5 floor
reduction 22.1 982.3 1219.3 79.4 6 T16
C32/40
726.2 256.1
145.2 70.1
4th floor
reduction 21.7 1176.0 1459.0 79.4 6 T20
C32/40
871.4 304.6
rd 145.2 70.1
3 floor
reduction 21.4 1369.8 1698.9 79.4 6 T16
C48/60
1016.6 353.2
145.2 70.1
2nd floor
reduction 21.3 1563.8 1939.1 79.4 6 T16
C48/60
1161.9 402.0
st 145.2 70.1
1 floor
reduction 21.2 1757.9 2179.4 79.4 6 T16
C48/60
1307.1 450.8
145.2 70.1
Ground floor reduction 21.2 1952.0 2419.7
1452.3 499.7
Project name Project No

CiD
EC2 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Typical Floor Beams 37
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW

500 x 400 beams


Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Actions taken from FE analysis

Beam on line E Beam on line E


Moments Shears
3 T20 top 3 T16 top 2 Legs of T10 @ 325
throughout
3 T12 btm

Beam on line 5 Beam on line 5


Moments Shears
3 T16 top 3 T16 top 2 Legs of T10 @ 325
throughout
3 T12 btm
Project name Project No

CiD
EC2 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Stability Loading 38
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Wind Loading EW
Pressure = 1.5 kN/m²
Width of elevation = 26.345 m Wind load per floor = 142.3 kN
50% taken by core in this section

Wind Loading NS
Pressure = 1.5 kN/m²
Width of elevation = 17.475 m Wind load per floor = 94.4 kN

Imperfections to Section 5.2 q0 = 1/ 200 m= 14 per storey

l m q1 S Gk S Qk Hi G Hi Q H WEW H WNS
Roof 4.6 14 0.0034 3681 1776 12.56 6.06 55.3 73.4
Level 8 8.2 28 0.0025 7362 3553 5.94 2.87 71.1 94.4
Level 7 11.8 42 0.0024 11043 5329 7.84 3.78 71.1 94.4
Level 6 15.4 56 0.0024 14724 6395 8.68 2.50 71.1 94.4
Level 5 19 70 0.0024 18405 7549 8.68 2.71 71.1 94.4
Level 4 22.6 84 0.0024 22086 8739 8.68 2.80 71.1 94.4
Level 3 26.2 98 0.0024 25767 9947 8.68 2.84 71.1 94.4
Level 2 29.8 112 0.0024 29448 11165 8.68 2.87 71.1 94.4
Level 1 33.4 126 0.0024 33129 12389 8.68 2.88 71.1 94.4
Grd Flr 36.4 140 0.0024 36811 13618 8.68 2.89 35.6 47.2
Summary of Horizontal Loading

Vertical Loading - Wall on Grid D


Overall length = 6.39 Centreline length = 6.14

Equivalent trapezoidal loading


kN/m
Left Right
Dead 123.38 -18.56
Total load Dead only Imposed 74.07 -12.39
Add stairs 6.03
5.61
Project name Project No

CiD
EC2 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Wall Loading 39
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Vertical Loading - Wall on Grid D/E


Overall length = 6.39 Centreline length = 6.14

Equivalent trapezoidal loading


kN/m
Left Right
Total load Dead only Dead 137.08 -21.64
Imposed 81.54 -14.58
Add stairs 6.03
Vertical Loading - Wall on Grid 3/4 5.61
Overall length = 2.84

Equivalent trapezoidal loading


kN/m
Left Right
Dead 73.28 245.45
Imposed 48.57 178.56

Total load Dead only

Vertical Loading - Wall on Grid 6


Overall length = 2.84

Equivalent trapezoidal loading


kN/m
Left Right
Total load Dead only Dead 1.94 0.13
Imposed 1.19 -0.08
Project name Project No

CiD
EC2 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Wall Design 40
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

mm2/m
on each face

Core Wall model, including West Wall West Wall


imperfections & pD Required vertical steel Required horizontal steel

South & East Walls South & East Walls


Required vertical steel Required horizontal steel

See next sheet for abbreviated reinforcement summary


Project name Project No

CiD
EC2 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Wall Design 41
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

T12 @ 200 T25 @ 100

T25 @ 100
T12 @ 250

T12 @ 175
for 1600
T20 @ 125

T25 @ 100
T20 @ 200
T25 @ 100

Ground to First

T16 @ 150

T16 @ 150
B

T20 @ 200
T20 @ 200

E
T12 @ 175

T12 @ 250
for 1600
A D

T16 @ 150
E
T20 @ 125

C B
T12 @ 175 T16 @ 150

T20 @ 125 T12 @ 200 First to 2nd

Basement
A = T12 @ 200
Level B = T12 @ 250
C = T10 @ 250
D = T10 @ 250
E = T12 @ 150

2nd to 3rd

Vertical Reinforcement
T10 @ 250 EF UNO
Project name Project No

CiD
EC2 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Wall Design 42
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

T16 @ 250 = 804

T16 @ 250 = 804


1 T25 EF 1 T25 EF

Ground Floor Transfer

1 T16 EF

T10 @ 300 = 262


2nd - 3rd

1 T25 EF

1 T16 EF

T12 @ 250 = 452


1st - 2nd

1 T25 EF

T16 @ 250 = 804


Grnd - 1st

1 T25 EF
Lintels

Horizontal Reinforcement
Max of T10 @ 300 & 25% vertical steel elsewhere
Project name Project No

CiD
EC2 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Retaining Walls 43
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW
Wall on Grid A
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

IDEALISED STRUCTURE and FORCE DIAGRAMS DESIGN STATUS : VALID


LGK, LQK in kN/m
X
S GK, S QK in kN/m 2 WGK, WQK in kN/m

Prop by Ground Floor


EXTERNAL
TW
WATER
E H
L
H B1
L W BASEMEN T
S H
E L
W
L bT
L

DIMENSIONS (mm)
H= 3835 B= 1800 Tw = 300
Hw = 1150.5 BI = 450 Tb = 350
He = 3815

MATERIAL PROPERTIES
fck = 32 N/mm2 gc = 1.50 concrete
fyk = 500 N/mm2 gs = 1.15 steel
Cover to tension reinforcement (co) = 40 mm
Allowable design surface crack width (Wmax) = 0.3 mm
Concrete density = 25.0 kN/m³ Wall Geometry
Cement type = N (S, N, R or RS)
Backfill at 21 days
SOIL PROPERTIES
Design angle of int'l friction of retained mat'l (Ø) = 30 degree
Design cohesion of retained mat'l (C ) = 0 kN/m² (Only granular backfill considered, ie "C" = 0)
Density of retained mat'l (q ) = 20 kN/m³
Submerged Density of retained mat'l (qs ) = 13.33 kN/m³ (default=2/3 of q), only apply when Hw >0
Design angle of int'l friction of base mat'l (Øb) = 20 degree = 13.33
Design cohesion of base mat'l (Cb ) = 0 kN/m² ASSUMPTIONS
Density of base mat'l (qb ) = 10 kN/m³ a) Wall friction is zero
Allowable gross ground bearing pressure (GBP) = 600 kN/m² b) Minimum active earth pressure = 0.25qH
LOADINGS (unfactored) c) Granular backfill
Surcharge load -- live (SQK) = 10 kN/m² h) Design not intended for walls over 3.5 m high
Surcharge load -- dead (SGK) = 5 kN/m² i)Does not include check for temp or shrinkage effects
Line load -- live (LQK) = 0 kN/m
Line load -- dead (LGK) = 0 kN/m
Distance of line load from wall (X) = 250 mm
Wall load -- live (WQK) = 202.17 kN/m
Wall load -- Dead (WGK) = 70.49 kN/m

LATERAL FORCES Ko = 0.50 default Ko = (1-SIN Ø) = 0.50


Kac = 1.41 = 2ÖKo

Force (kN) Lever arm (m) gf Ultimate Force (kN)


PE = 70.56 LE = 1.299 1.35 95.26
PS(GK) = 9.54 LS = 1.91 1.35 12.88
PS(QK) = 19.07 LS = 1.91 1.50 28.61
PL(GK) = 0.00 LL = 3.61 1.35 0.00
PL(QK) = 0.00 LL = 3.61 1.50 0.00
PW = 6.62 LW = 0.38 1.50 9.93
Total 105.79 146.68 114 kg/m
Project name Project No

CiD
EC2 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Retaining Walls 44
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW
Wall on Grid A
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

EXTERNAL STABILITY STABILITY CHECK : OK

ANALYSIS - Assumptions & Notes

1) Wall idealised as a propped cantilever ( i.e. pinned at top and fixed at base )
2) Wall is braced.
3) Maximum slenderness of wall is limited to 15, i.e [ 0.9*(He-Tb/2)/Tw < 15 ]
4) Maximum Ultimate axial load on wall is limited to 0.1fck times the wall cross-sectional area
5) Design Span (Effective wall height) = He - (Tb/2)
6) -ve moment is hogging ( i.e. tension at external face of wall )
+ve moment is sagging ( i.e. tension at internal face of wall )
7) " Wall MT. " is maximum +ve moment on the wall.
8) Estimated lateral deflections are used for checking the PD effect .

UNFACTORED LOADS AND FORCES

Force Lever arm Base MT. Wall MT. Reaction at Reaction at Estimated Elastic
Lateral Force (kN) to base (m) (kNm) (kNm) Base (kN) Top (kN) Deflection D (mm)
PE = 64.66 1.24 -31.93 14.56 51.56 13.10 0.8
PS(GK) = 9.10 1.82 -4.19 2.35 5.72 3.38 0.2
PS(QK) = 18.20 1.82 -8.37 4.71 11.44 6.76 0.1
PL(GK) = 0.00 3.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
PL(QK) = 0.00 3.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
PW = 4.76 0.33 -1.25 0.22 4.68 0.08 0.0
Total 96.72 -45.74 21.85 73.40 23.32 1.1

GROUND BEARING FAILURE


LOAD CASE: Wall Load MAX 1
Taking moments about centre of base (anticlockwise "+") Surcharge MAX 1

Vertical FORCES (kN) Lever arm (m) Moment (kNm) BEARING PRESSURE (kN/m²)
Wall load = 272.66 0.30 81.798 0.00 1.80
0
Wall (sw) = 26.14 0.30 7.84
50
Base = 15.75 0.00 0.00
Earth = 28.78 0.68 19.43 100

Water = 3.60 0.68 2.43 150

Surcharge = 6.75 0.68 4.56 200


Line load = 0.00 0.70 0.00 250
åV= 353.68 å Mv = 116.06 300

350
MOMENT due to LATERAL FORCES, Mo = -45.74 kNm

RESULTANT MOMENT, M = Mv + Mo = 70.31 kNm

ECCENTRICITY FROM BASE CENTRE, M / V = 0.20 m


MAXIMUM GROSS BEARING PRESSURE = 326.70 kN/m2 < 600 OK

SLIDING AT BASE (using overall factor of safety instead of partial safety factor) F.O.S = 1.50

SUM of LATERAL FORCES, P = 73.40 kN


BASE FRICTION, Fb = - ( V TANØb + B.Cb ) = -128.73 kN

Factor of Safety, Fb / P = 1.75 > 1.50 OK


Project name Project No

CiD
EC2 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Retaining Walls 45
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW
Wall on Grid A
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

STRUCTURAL DESIGNS (ultimate) DESIGN CHECKS : OK


prEN 1992-1
WALL ( per metre length ) reference
AXIAL LOAD CAPACITY ( Limited to 0.1fck ) = 960.00 kN > 398.4165 OK

Force gf Ultimate Ult. Moment Ult. Shear Ult. Shear


Lateral Force (kN) Force (kN) at base (kNm) at base (kN) at top (kN)
PE = 64.66 1.35 87.29 -43.11 69.61 17.68
PS(GK) = 9.10 1.35 12.28 -5.65 7.72 4.56
PS(QK) = 18.20 1.50 27.30 -12.56 17.16 10.14
PL(GK) = 0.00 1.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
PL(QK) = 0.00 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
PW = 4.76 1.50 7.14 -1.88 7.02 0.12
Total 96.72 134.01 -63.20 101.50 32.51

EXT MOMENT (kNm) INT


Design Bending Moments
-100 -50 0 50
0.00
On INTERNAL face due to lateral forces, M int = 29.60 kNm
On EXTERNAL face due to lateral forces, M ext = -63.20 kNm
0.73
top >

Eccentricity of Axial Loads = 125 mm 6.1 (3)P


LATERAL DEFLECTION " D " = 1.1 mm
1.46
Due to eccentricity of axial loads, Mecc = 49.8 kNm
WALL (m)

Due to PD effect, Mp = 0.42 kNm


2.20

Total Mmt on INTERNAL face (Mint+0.5Mecc+Mp) = 54.9 kNm


< base

2.93
Total Mmt on EXTERNAL face (M ext+0.5Mecc) = -88.1 kNm
3.66

EXTERNAL FACE INTERNAL FACE


WALL REINFORCEMENT : Min. As = 396 399 mm2 9.2.1.1 (1)
f= 16 12 mm
centres = 200 < 250 200 < 250 mm OK 9.3.1.1 (3) & (4)
2
Asprov = 1005 > 396 565 > 399 mm OK
MOMENT of RESISTANCE : d= 252 254 mm
z= 239.4 241.3 mm Fig 3.5
As' = 0 0 mm2 3.1.7 (3)
Mres = 104.6 > 88.1 59.3 > 54.9 kNm OK
CRACK WIDTHS: X= 79.08 62.43 mm 7.3.4 (2)
Temp & shrinkage effects not included esm-ecm = 0.00046 0.00017 (7.9)
Wk = 0.145 < 0.3 mm 0.000 < 0.3 mm mm OK
. Section is Uncracke d

BASE of WALL TOP of WALL


f=
2
SHEAR RESISTANCE:As = 1005 10 @200 mm = 393 mm /m
r = 100As/bd = 0.40% = 0.15%
2
vRd,ct = 0.530 0.480 N/mm (6.2)
Vres = 133.6 > 101.5 121.9 > 32.5 kN OK 6.2.2
REINFORCEMENT SUMMARY for WALL
f centres As Min. As
Type
mm mm mm2 mm2
EXTERNAL FACE T 16 200 1005 396 OK
INTERNAL FACE T 12 200 565 399 OK
TRANSVERSE T 10 300 262 201 OK
Project name Project No

CiD
EC2 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Retaining Walls 46
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW
Wall on Grid A
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

OUTER BASE ( per metre length ) prEN 1992-1


Composite gf = 1.41 reference
Ult. Shear = 41.38 kN (AT d from FACE of WALL)
Ult. MT. = 32.75 kNm TENSION - BOTTOM FA CE

BOTTOM REINFORCEMENT : Min. As = 478 mm2 9.2.1.1 (1)


f= 12 mm
centres = 200 mm < 400 OK 9.3.1.1 (3) & (4)
Asprov = 565 mm
2
> 478 OK

MOMENT of RESISTANCE : d= 304 mm


z= 288.8 mm Fig 3.5
2
As' = 0 mm 3.1.7 (3)
Mres = 71.01 kNm > 32.75 OK

SHEAR RESISTANCE: r = 100As/bd = 0.22%


vRd,ct = 0.480 N/mm2 (6.2)
Vres = 145.9 kN > 41.38 OK 6.2.2

CRACK WIDTHS: Temp & shrinkage effects not included


X= 69.12 mm esm-ecm = 0.00004 7.3.4 (2)
Wk = 0.000 mm < 0.3 mm OK (7.9)
Section is Uncracke d
INNER BASE ( per metre length )
Ult. Shear = -112.41 kN (AT d from FACE of WALL)
Ult. MT. = 97.39 kNm TENSION - BOTTOM FA CE

2
BOTTOM REINFORCEMENT : Min. As = 475 mm 9.2.1.1 (1)
f= 16 mm
centres = 250 mm < 400 OK 9.3.1.1 (3) & (4)
Asprov = 804 mm2 > 475 OK

MOMENT of RESISTANCE : d= 302 mm


z= 286.9 mm Fig 3.5
2
As' = 0 mm 3.1.7 (3)
Mres = 100.32 kNm < 97.39 OK

SHEAR RESISTANCE: r = 100As/bd = 0.27%


2
vRd,ct = 0.480 N/mm (6.2)
Vres = 144.9 kN > 112.41 OK 6.2.2

CRACK WIDTHS: Temp & shrinkage effects not included


X= 80.12 mm esm-ecm = 0.00034 7.3.4 (2)
Wk = 0.103 mm < 0.3 mm OK (7.9)
.
REINFORCEMENT SUMMARY for BASE
Type f centres As Min. As
2 2
mm mm mm mm
TOP T 12 200 565 475 OK
BOTTOM T 16 250 565 475 OK
TRANSVERSE T 8 400 126 113 OK

Wall on Grid 6 similar. Wall on Grid E, 2400 x 500 base due to heavier column loads.
Project name Project No

CiD
EC2 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Pad Foundations 47
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.
Project name Project No

CiD
EC2 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Pad Foundations 48
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

(Base B4 similar, but 3050 sq x 800)


Project name Project No

CiD
EC2 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Pad Foundations 49
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.
Comparative Design Study
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

to
EC2 & BS8110
of a
Typical RC Framed Structure

Calculations
to
BS 8110

July 2002
Project name Project No

CiD
BS8110 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Typical Floor GA 1
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW

2 4 6
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

A
375 sq 375 sq 350 f

3600 1668

B
550 sq 550 sq 375 sq
Line of zero rotation

Allow for one 150 sq hole


at centre of face of
internal columns

625
350 f
280 Solid slab C

D
550 sq

In Ec2 FE analysis, assume


fctm = value at10 days.
Composite f values from
Annex B of EC2. 985
325

E
400 sq 550 sq 400 sq

350 f
350 f
F

1 3 5
1 hour fire period external exposure = severe internal exposure = moderate.
Slabs, beams and walls - C32/40 concrete. All reinforcement fy = 460 N/mm² (high bond).
Imposed dead load = 1.0 kN/m² on floors and roof (h same as floors).
Perimeter cladding = 1.0 kN/m² on external elevation.
Superimposed load = (4+1) kN/m² on floors, 1.5 kN/m² on roof.
Project name Project No

CiD
BS8110 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Basement GA 2
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW

2 4 6
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

3600 7200 5050

A
1750 x 350 base
300 wall

4750
B

3150 sq 850 3000 sq x 850


base base

1750 x 350 base


Retaining walls resisting

8400
granular backfill with 10

300 wall
kN/m² surcharge and
water pressure to 1m
above basement level. 1450
C

2125
D

3600 sq x 1100
base

8400
2400 x 4000
x 600 base

2250 x 450 base


300 wall
E
8400 6350 2300
4370

1 3 5
Pilecaps and ground bearing slab not included in design.
Ground bearing slab assumed to be 225 thick with 2.5 kN/m² imposed load.
Max ground bearing pressure taken as 600 kN/m².
Foundations & retaining walls - C32/40 concrete - 40mm cover.
Columns and core walls - C48/60 concrete (reducing to 32/40) - 1 hour fire period.
Project name Project No

CiD
BS8110 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Typical Floor 3
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Typical Floor Loading


280 Slab = 6.72 at 24 kN/m³
Applied Dead = 1.00
7.72 = Gk
Partitions = 1.00
Imposed = 4.00 Qk = 5.00 kN/m²
Total = 12.72 kN/m² characteristic

Permant imposed loading = 0.25 x Imposed load 3.3.3; Part 2


Permanent UD load = 7.72 + 0.25 x 5 = 8.97 kN/m²

Perimeter line load from cladding = 3.6 kN/m

ULS UD loading = 1.4Gk + 1.6Qk = 18.81 kN/m²

Parameters for FE Analysis


fcu = 40 N/mm²
Ecm28 = 28 kN/mm² Table 7.2; Part 2
fct = 1.0 N/mm² at tension steel
Tension stiffening = 0.55 N/mm² long-term from Fig 3.1: Part 2

LOADING SEQUENCE kN/m² at days


Self weight 6.72 10
Applied dead 2.00 60
Permanent imposed 1.00 60
Variable load 3.00 ¥
COMPOSITE E and f VALUES
f values from Annex B.1 of EC2
Longterm Permanent Longterm Total
Ø0 Et Ø0 Et
Self weight 2.60 7.77 2.60 7.77
Applied dead 1.85 9.81 1.85 9.81 To 60 days
Permanent imposed 1.85 9.81 1.85 9.81 SW + applied dead
Variable load 0 28.00 Ø (t,t0) Et
Composite 2.37 8.30 1.81 9.95 1.18 12.86

Loading regions = as for EC2, but BS 8110 pattern loading applied


Project name Project No

CiD
BS8110 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Typical Floor 4
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Secion B

WHITE = nominal steel


(T12 @ 300)
Secion A

FEM-Design
As REQUIRED BTM X
Project name Project No

CiD
BS8110 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Typical Floor 5
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Section D

WHITE = nominal steel


(T12 @ 300)

Sectio
nC

FEM-Design
As REQUIRED BTM Y
Project name Project No

CiD
BS8110 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Typical Floor 6
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Section H
Section G
Section E

WHITE = nominal steel


(T12 @ 300)
Section F

FEM-Design
As REQUIRED TOP X
Project name Project No

CiD
BS8110 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Typical Floor 7
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Section J

WHITE = nominal steel


(T12 @ 300)

Section K

Section L

FEM-Design
As REQUIRED TOP Y
Project name Project No

CiD
BS8110 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Typical Floor 8
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

T16 @ 250 T20 @ 175


T16 @ 200 = 1795
T16 @ 175 = 804
= 1005
= 1149

Section A

T12 @ 175 T12 @ 150 T12 @ 175


= 646 = 754 = 646

Section B

Bottom steel X direction

T16 @ 250 T12 @ 200


T16 @ 150 = 804 = 565
= 1340
Section C

T12 @ 150 T16 @ 225 T12 @ 200


= 754 = 894 = 565

Section D

Bottom steel Y direction


Project name Project No

CiD
BS8110 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Typical Floor 9
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

8 T25
4 T20 in 925
in 800 =4245
=1571

T12 @200 T12 @200


= 565 = 565

Section F
T25 @ 150 T20 @ 125
= 3272 = 2513 T16 @ 125
T20 @ 175 = 1608
T20 @ 275
75
= 1795 T16 @ 250
= 1142
= 8044

T12 @ 200 T12 @ 225 T12 @ 225


= 565 = 503 = 503
Section E

T16@100 T16@100
= 2011 = 2011
T16@150
T16@200 T20@150 T16@200 = 1340
= 1005 T16@150 = 2094 = 1005
T20@150 T16@300
= 1340
= 1340 = 670

T16@275 T12@225 T16@250 T12@225 T12@250


= 731 = 503 = 804 = 503 = 452
Section G

Top steel X direction


Project name Project No

CiD
BS8110 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Typical Floor 10
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

T16@100
= 2011 T16@150 T12@150
= 1340 = 754

T12@200 T12@225
= 565 = 503

Section H
Top steel X direction

T20@100
= 3142 T20@125
T20@225 = 2513
= 1396 T20@250
= 1257 T16@150
= 1340

T12@275 T12@275 T12@250


= 411 = 411 = 452

Section J
Top steel Y direction
Project name Project No

CiD
BS8110 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Typical Floor 11
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

T20@100
= 3142
T20@200
= 1057

T20@150
= 2094

T16@225
= 894

T16@275 T16@250 T12@250


= 731 = 804 = 452

Section K

T25@75
= 6545

T20@125
= 2513
T25@175
T25
T20@250
= 2805
= 1257

T12@225 T12@250
= 503 = 452

Section L

Top steel Y direction


Project name Project No

CiD
BS8110 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Typical Floor 12
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

2 x 4900/250 = 39.2
> 26.6 - 0.3 = 26.3 mm

All permanent load deflections are


within L/250 limit

Permanent Load Defelections


with Applied Reinforcement
Project name Project No

CiD
BS8110 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Typical Floor 13
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Max = 15.4 - 0.2 = 15.2 mm

Dead Only Defelections (f = 1.18)


with Applied Reinforcement
Project name Project No

CiD
BS8110 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Typical Floor 14
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Max D affecting cladding


= 34.8 - 15.2 = 19.6 mm
= L / 500 OK

Max = 35.1 - 0.3 = 34.8 mm

Total Load Defelections (f = 1.81)


with Applied Reinforcement
Project name Project No

CiD
BS8110 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Typical Floor 15
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Full ULS Column Moments


with Applied Reinforcement
Project name Project No

CiD
BS8110 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Typical Floor 16
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

128.6 113.7 76.1

404.2 360.6 213.1

154.5

530.7

254.9 366.3 213.4

145.2
78.8
Full ULS
Dead only

Column Reactions
Project name Project No

CiD
BS8110 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Typical Floor 17
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Project BS8110 Comparative Design REINFORCED CONCRETE COUNCIL


Client BRE Made by Date Page
Location Column D2 INTERNAL rmw 30-Jun-2002
PUNCHING SHEAR to B S8110:1997 COLUMN Checked Revision Job No
Originated from RCC13.xls on CD © 1999-2002 BCA for RCC - 2156

MATERIALS fcu N/mm2 40 STATUS Legend


fyv N/mm2 460 VALID DESIGN
link Ø mm 10

DIMENSIONS A mm 500 E mm 250


B mm 500 F mm -75
G mm 150 H mm 150

LOADING Vt kN 1299.3 0 0 3397.1


ult UDL kN/m 2 18.81

2
SLAB h mm 280 dx mm 242.5 Asx mm /m 3272
dy mm 220 Asy mm2/m 3142
ave d mm 231.25 ave As % 1.389

RESULTS Veff = 1494.2 kN vc = 0.9458 N/mm2 (Table 3.8)


At col. face, v max = 3.480 N/mm2 At 1.5d perimeter, v = 1.4327 N/mm2
At 3d perimeter, v = 0.8775 N/mm2

PROVIDE LINKS (single leg) .

Perimeter 1 10 T10 @ 335 115 from col face


Perimeter 2 14 T10 @ 330 289 from col face
Perimeter 3 18 T10 @ 325 463 from col face
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0 Plan
0 0 0

Punching at Column D2
B2 and B4 similar

Links not required at perimeter columns


Project name Project No

CiD
BS8110 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Column Loads & Design 18
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Column Design Summary


H B
COLUMN A2 & A4 375 375 SW = 11.7

Axial Force Moments


Dead Imposed Service Ultimate M® M­ Rebar
140.3 19.3
Roof C40 reduction 0.0 159.6 227.3 4.8 35.3 4 T16
140.3 19.3
140.3 64.4
8th floor C40 reduction 8.4 355.9 513.3 6.8 51.4 4 T16
280.5 75.4
140.3 64.4
7th floor C40 reduction 21.3 539.3 778.8 6.8 51.4 4 T16
420.8 118.5
140.3 64.4
6th floor C40 reduction 34.1 709.9 1023.6 6.8 51.4 4 T16
561.1 148.8
140.3 64.4
5th floor C40 reduction 47.0 867.5 1247.8 6.8 51.4 4 T16
701.4 166.2
140.3 64.4
4th floor C40 reduction 25.8 1046.5 1506.0 6.8 51.4 4 T16
841.6 204.8
140.3 64.4
rd
3 floor C60 reduction 25.8 1225.4 1764.2 6.8 51.4 4 T16
981.9 243.5
140.3 64.4
2nd floor C60 reduction 25.8 1404.3 2022.4 6.8 51.4 4 T16
1122.2 282.1
140.3 64.4
st
1 floor C60 reduction 25.8 1583.2 2280.7 6.8 51.4 4 T16
1262.4 320.8
140.3 64.4
Ground floor reduction 25.8 1762.1 2538.9
1402.7 359.4
Project name Project No

CiD
BS8110 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Column Loads & Design 19
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Column Design Summary


H B
COLUMN B2 550 550 SW = 25.1

Axial Force Moments


Dead Imposed Service Ultimate M® M­ Rebar
429.3 74.4
Roof C40 reduction 0.0 503.7 720.1 8.8 67.3 4 T20
429.3 74.4
429.3 248.0
8th floor C40 reduction 32.2 1148.8 1666.3 12.6 97.2 4 T20
858.6 290.2
429.3 248.0
7th floor C40 reduction 81.8 1744.3 2533.2 12.6 97.2 4 T20
1287.9 456.3
429.3 248.0
6th floor C40 reduction 131.4 2290.1 3320.8 12.6 97.2 4 T20
1717.2 572.9
429.3 248.0
5th floor C40 reduction 181.0 2786.4 4028.9 12.6 97.2 4 T20
2146.5 639.9
429.3 248.0
4th floor C40 reduction 99.2 3364.5 4868.1 12.6 97.2 4 T20
2575.8 788.7
429.3 248.0
rd
3 floor C60 reduction 99.2 3942.6 5707.2 12.6 97.2 4 T20
3005.2 937.5
429.3 248.0
nd
2 floor C60 reduction 99.2 4520.8 6546.3 12.6 97.2 4 T20
3434.5 1086.3
429.3 248.0
st
1 floor C60 reduction 99.2 5098.9 7385.4 12.6 97.2 4 T20
3863.8 1235.1
429.3 248.0
Ground floor
reduction 99.2 5677.0 8224.6 9.5 73.4 4 T32
C60
4293.1 1383.9
Project name Project No

CiD
BS8110 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Column Loads & Design 20
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Column Design Summary


H B
COLUMN B4 550 550 SW = 25.1

Axial Force Moments


Dead Imposed Service Ultimate M® M­ Rebar
385.7 69.5
Roof C40 reduction 0.0 455.2 651.2 33.0 67.0 4 T20
385.7 69.5
385.7 231.7
th
8 floor C40 reduction 30.1 1042.5 1513.8 47.5 96.4 4 T20
771.4 271.1
385.7 231.7
7th floor C40 reduction 76.5 1583.5 2302.2 47.5 96.4 4 T20
1157.1 426.4
385.7 231.7
6th floor C40 reduction 122.8 2078.1 3016.4 47.5 96.4 4 T20
1542.8 535.3
385.7 231.7
5th floor C40 reduction 169.2 2526.4 3656.5 47.5 96.4 4 T20
1928.5 597.9
385.7 231.7
4th floor C40 reduction 92.7 3051.1 4419.0 47.5 96.4 4 T20
2314.2 736.9
385.7 231.7
rd
3 floor C60 reduction 92.7 3575.9 5181.4 47.5 96.4 4 T20
2700.0 875.9
385.7 231.7
nd
2 floor C60 reduction 92.7 4100.6 5943.9 47.5 96.4 4 T20
3085.7 1015.0
385.7 231.7
st
1 floor C60 reduction 92.7 4625.4 6706.3 47.5 96.4 4 T20
3471.4 1154.0
385.7 231.7
Ground floor
reduction 92.7 5150.1 7468.7 35.9 72.9 4 T20
C60
3857.1 1293.0
Project name Project No

CiD
BS8110 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Column Loads & Design 21
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Column Design Summary


H B
COLUMN B6 375 375 SW = 11.7

Axial Force Moments


Dead Imposed Service Ultimate M® M­ Rebar
224.8 35.4
Roof C40 reduction 0.0 260.2 371.4 13.5 25.6 4 T16
224.8 35.4
224.8 118.2
8th floor C40 reduction 15.4 587.8 850.6 19.5 37.3 4 T16
449.5 138.3
224.8 118.2
7th floor C40 reduction 39.0 891.7 1291.9 19.5 37.3 4 T16
674.3 217.4
224.8 118.2
6th floor C40 reduction 62.6 1172.0 1695.5 19.5 37.3 4 T16
899.1 273.0
224.8 118.2
5th floor C40 reduction 86.3 1428.7 2061.2 19.5 37.3 4 T16
1123.9 304.9
224.8 118.2
4th floor C40 reduction 47.3 1724.4 2489.3 19.5 37.3 4 T20
1348.6 375.8
224.8 118.2
rd
3 floor C60 reduction 47.3 2020.1 2917.4 19.5 37.3 4 T16
1573.4 446.7
224.8 118.2
2nd floor C60 reduction 47.3 2315.7 3345.5 19.5 37.3 4 T25
1798.2 517.6
224.8 118.2
st
1 floor C60 reduction 47.3 2611.4 3773.6 19.5 37.3 4 T32
2022.9 588.4
224.8 118.2
Ground floor reduction 47.3 2907.1 4201.8
2247.7 659.3
Project name Project No

CiD
BS8110 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Column Loads & Design 22
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Column Design Summary


H B
COLUMN D2 550 550 SW = 24.1

Axial Force Moments


Dead Imposed Service Ultimate M® M­ Rebar
554.8 104.3
Roof C40 reduction 0.0 659.1 943.6 8.6 61.3 4 T20
554.8 104.3
554.8 347.7
th
8 floor C40 reduction 45.2 1516.4 2204.3 12.5 87.2 4 T20
1109.6 406.8
554.8 347.7
7th floor C40 reduction 114.7 2304.2 3353.8 12.5 87.2 4 T20
1664.4 639.8
554.8 347.7
6th floor C40 reduction 184.3 3022.4 4392.0 12.5 87.2 4 T20
2219.2 803.2
554.8 347.7
5th floor C40 reduction 253.8 3671.1 5318.9 12.5 87.2 4 T20
2774.0 897.1
554.8 347.7
4th floor C40 reduction 139.1 4434.5 6429.4 12.5 87.2 6 T32
3328.8 1105.7
554.8 347.7
rd
3 floor C60 reduction 139.1 5197.9 7540.0 12.5 87.2 6 T20
3883.6 1314.3
554.8 347.7
nd
2 floor C60 reduction 139.1 5961.4 8650.5 12.5 87.2 6 T32
4438.4 1522.9
554.8 347.7
st
1 floor C60 reduction 139.1 6724.8 9761.0 12.5 87.2 8 T32
4993.2 1731.5
554.8 347.7
Ground floor
reduction 139.1 7488.2 10871.5 9.4 66.1 8 T40
C60
5548.0 1940.2
Project name Project No

CiD
BS8110 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Column Loads & Design 23
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Column Design Summary


H B
COLUMN E1 400 400 SW = 13.3

Axial Force Moments


Dead Imposed Service Ultimate M® M­ Rebar
268.2 43.1
Roof C40 reduction 0.0 311.2 444.3 67.1 187.5 6 T16
268.2 43.1
268.2 143.5
8th floor C40 reduction 18.7 704.3 1019.6 94.3 266.2 6 T32
536.4 167.9
268.2 143.5
7th floor C40 reduction 47.4 1068.6 1548.9 94.3 266.2 6 T32
804.5 264.1
268.2 143.5
6th floor C40 reduction 76.1 1404.3 2032.3 94.3 266.2 6 T32
1072.7 331.5
268.2 143.5
5th floor C40 reduction 104.8 1711.2 2469.7 94.3 266.2 6 T32
1340.9 370.3
268.2 143.5
4th floor C40 reduction 57.4 2065.5 2983.0 94.3 266.2 6 T40
1609.1 456.4
268.2 143.5
rd
3 floor C60 reduction 57.4 2419.8 3496.2 94.3 266.2 6 T32
1877.3 542.5
268.2 143.5
2nd floor C60 reduction 57.4 2774.1 4009.4 94.3 266.2 6 T32
2145.4 628.6
268.2 143.5
st
1 floor C60 reduction 57.4 3128.4 4522.7 94.3 266.2 6 T40
2413.6 714.8
268.2 143.5
Ground floor reduction 57.4 3482.7 5035.9
2681.8 800.9
Project name Project No

CiD
BS8110 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
24
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Column Design Summary


H B
COLUMN E3 550 550 SW = 25.1

Axial Force Moments


Dead Imposed Service Ultimate M® M­ Rebar
391.4 70.0
Roof C40 reduction 0.0 461.4 660.0 59.3 55.2 4 T20
391.4 70.0
391.4 233.4
8th floor C40 reduction 30.3 1055.8 1532.8 85.5 80.0 4 T20
782.8 273.0
391.4 233.4
7th floor C40 reduction 77.0 1603.6 2330.9 85.5 80.0 4 T20
1174.2 429.4
391.4 233.4
6th floor C40 reduction 123.7 2104.7 3054.4 85.5 80.0 4 T20
1565.6 539.1
391.4 233.4
5th floor C40 reduction 170.4 2559.1 3703.2 85.5 80.0 4 T20
1957.0 602.1
391.4 233.4
4th floor C40 reduction 93.3 3090.5 4475.2 85.5 80.0 4 T20
2348.4 742.1
391.4 233.4
rd
3 floor C60 reduction 93.3 3622.0 5247.2 85.5 80.0 4 T20
2739.9 882.1
391.4 233.4
2nd floor C60 reduction 93.3 4153.4 6019.2 85.5 80.0 4 T20
3131.3 1022.1
391.4 233.4
st
1 floor C60 reduction 93.3 4684.8 6791.2 85.5 80.0 4 T20
3522.7 1162.1
391.4 233.4
Ground floor reduction 93.3 5216.2 7563.2
3914.1 1302.2
Project name Project No

CiD
BS8110 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
25
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Column Design Summary


H B
COLUMN E5 400 400 SW = 13.3

Axial Force Moments


Dead Imposed Service Ultimate M® M­ Rebar
226.7 29.8
Roof C40 reduction 0.0 256.5 365.1 6.6 28.1 4 T16
226.7 29.8
226.7 99.5
8th floor C40 reduction 12.9 569.7 820.9 9.6 40.8 4 T16
453.4 116.4
226.7 99.5
7th floor C40 reduction 32.8 863.1 1244.9 9.6 40.8 4 T16
680.0 183.0
226.7 99.5
6th floor C40 reduction 52.7 1136.5 1637.0 9.6 40.8 4 T16
906.7 229.8
226.7 99.5
5th floor C40 reduction 72.6 1390.0 1997.3 9.6 40.8 4 T16
1133.4 256.6
226.7 99.5
4th floor C40 reduction 39.8 1676.4 2410.2 9.6 40.8 4 T16
1360.1 316.3
226.7 99.5
rd
3 floor C60 reduction 39.8 1962.7 2823.0 9.6 40.8 4 T16
1586.8 376.0
226.7 99.5
2nd floor C60 reduction 39.8 2249.1 3235.8 9.6 40.8 4 T16
1813.4 435.6
226.7 99.5
st
1 floor C60 reduction 39.8 2535.4 3648.7 9.6 40.8 4 T16
2040.1 495.3
226.7 99.5
Ground floor reduction 39.8 2821.8 4061.5
2266.8 555.0
Project name Project No

CiD
BS8110 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
26
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Column Design Summary


Diameter
COLUMN A6 350 SW = 8.0

Axial Force Moment


Dead Imposed Service Ultimate M Rebar
84.1 10.9
Roof C40 reduction 0.0 95.0 135.2 11.2 6 T12
84.1 10.9
84.1 36.4
8th floor C40 reduction 4.7 210.7 303.5 16.4 6 T12
168.2 42.5
84.1 36.4
7th floor C40 reduction 12.0 319.1 460.2 16.4 6 T12
252.3 66.9
84.1 36.4
6th floor C40 reduction 19.3 420.3 605.2 16.4 6 T12
336.3 84.0
84.1 36.4
5th floor C40 reduction 26.5 514.2 738.7 16.4 6 T12
420.4 93.8
84.1 36.4
4th floor C40 reduction 14.5 620.1 891.3 16.4 6 T12
504.5 115.6
84.1 36.4
rd
3 floor C60 reduction 14.5 726.0 1043.9 16.4 6 T12
588.6 137.4
84.1 36.4
nd
2 floor C60 reduction 14.5 831.9 1196.5 16.4 6 T12
672.7 159.2
84.1 36.4
st
1 floor C60 reduction 14.5 937.8 1349.1 16.4 6 T12
756.8 181.0
84.1 36.4
Ground floor reduction 14.5 1043.7 1501.7
840.9 202.8
Project name Project No

CiD
BS8110 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
27
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Column Design Summary


Diameter
COLUMN C6 350 SW = 8.0

Axial Force Moment


Dead Imposed Service Ultimate M Rebar
162.5 25.9
Roof C40 reduction 0.0 188.4 268.9 66.9 6 T16
162.5 25.9
162.5 86.3
8th floor C40 reduction 11.2 425.9 616.4 83.1 6 T16
325.0 100.9
162.5 86.3
7th floor C40 reduction 28.5 646.2 936.4 83.1 6 T16
487.5 158.7
162.5 86.3
6th floor C40 reduction 45.7 849.2 1228.7 83.1 6 T16
649.9 199.2
162.5 86.3
5th floor C40 reduction 63.0 1035.0 1493.4 83.1 6 T20
812.4 222.5
162.5 86.3
4th floor C40 reduction 34.5 1249.2 1803.7 83.1 6 T25
974.9 274.3
162.5 86.3
rd
3 floor C60 reduction 34.5 1463.4 2114.0 83.1 6 T16
1137.4 326.0
162.5 86.3
nd
2 floor C60 reduction 34.5 1677.7 2424.3 83.1 6 T20
1299.9 377.8
162.5 86.3
st
1 floor C60 reduction 34.5 1891.9 2734.6 83.1 6 T25
1462.4 429.5
162.5 86.3
Ground floor reduction 34.5 2106.1 3044.8
1624.9 481.3
Project name Project No

CiD
BS8110 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
28
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Column Design Summary


Diameter
COLUMN F1 350 SW = 8.0

Axial Force Moment


Dead Imposed Service Ultimate M Rebar
86.8 9.8
Roof C40 reduction 0.0 96.6 137.1 86.1 6 T20
86.8 9.8
86.8 32.6
8th floor C40 reduction 4.2 211.7 303.9 124.5 6 T25
173.6 38.1
86.8 32.6
7th floor C40 reduction 10.7 320.2 460.3 124.5 6 T25
260.4 59.9
86.8 32.6
6th floor C40 reduction 17.3 422.3 606.3 124.5 6 T25
347.1 75.2
86.8 32.6
5th floor C40 reduction 23.8 517.9 741.9 124.5 6 T25
433.9 84.0
86.8 32.6
4th floor C40 reduction 13.0 624.2 894.6 124.5 6 T25
520.7 103.5
86.8 32.6
rd
3 floor C60 reduction 13.0 730.5 1047.4 124.5 6 T16
607.5 123.0
86.8 32.6
2nd floor C60 reduction 13.0 836.9 1200.1 124.5 6 T16
694.3 142.6
86.8 32.6
st
1 floor C60 reduction 13.0 943.2 1352.9 124.5 6 T16
781.1 162.1
86.8 32.6
Ground floor reduction 13.0 1049.5 1505.6
867.9 181.6
Project name Project No

CiD
BS8110 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
29
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Column Design Summary


Diameter
COLUMN F3 350 SW = 8.0

Axial Force Moment


Dead Imposed Service Ultimate M Rebar
153.2 21.6
Roof C40 reduction 0.0 174.8 249.0 43.5 6 T12
153.2 21.6
153.2 71.9
8th floor C40 reduction 9.3 390.5 563.5 63.6 6 T12
306.4 84.1
153.2 71.9
7th floor C40 reduction 23.7 591.8 855.0 63.6 6 T12
459.6 132.3
153.2 71.9
6th floor C40 reduction 38.1 778.8 1123.5 63.6 6 T12
612.7 166.1
153.2 71.9
5th floor C40 reduction 52.5 951.4 1369.1 63.6 6 T12
765.9 185.5
153.2 71.9
4th floor C40 reduction 28.8 1147.7 1652.5 63.6 6 T20
919.1 228.6
153.2 71.9
rd
3 floor C60 reduction 28.8 1344.0 1936.0 63.6 6 T12
1072.3 271.7
153.2 71.9
2nd floor C60 reduction 28.8 1540.4 2219.5 63.6 6 T12
1225.5 314.9
153.2 71.9
st
1 floor C60 reduction 28.8 1736.7 2502.9 63.6 6 T16
1378.7 358.0
153.2 71.9
Ground floor reduction 28.8 1933.0 2786.4
1531.9 401.1
Project name Project No

CiD
BS8110 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Typical Floor Beams 30
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW

500 x 400 beams


Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Actions taken from FE analysis

Beam on line E Beam on line E


Moments Shears
3 T20 top 3 T16 top 2 Legs of T10 @ 225
throughout
3 T12 btm

Beam on line 5 Beam on line 5


Moments Shears
3 T16 top 3 T16 top 2 Legs of T10 @ 325
throughout
3 T12 btm
Project name Project No

CiD
BS8110 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Stability Loading 31
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Wind Loading EW
Pressure = 1.5 kN/m²
Width of elevation = 26.345 m Wind load per floor = 142.3 kN
30% taken by core in this section

Wind Loading NS
Pressure = 1.5 kN/m²
Width of elevation = 17.475 m Wind load per floor = 94.4 kN
60% taken by core in this section

l S Gk S Qk 1.5% Gk H WEW H WNS HEW HNS


Roof 4.6 3770 1778 56.6 32.0 42.5 56.6 56.6
Level 8 8.2 7541 3556 113.1 42.7 56.6 56.6 56.6
Level 7 11.8 11311 5334 169.7 42.7 56.6 56.6 56.6
Level 6 15.4 15081 6401 226.2 42.7 56.6 56.6 56.6
Level 5 19 18852 7557 282.8 42.7 56.6 56.6 56.6
Level 4 22.6 22622 8748 339.3 42.7 56.6 56.6 56.6
Level 3 26.2 26392 9957 395.9 42.7 56.6 56.6 56.6
Level 2 29.8 30162 11176 452.4 42.7 56.6 56.6 56.6
Level 1 33.4 33933 12402 509.0 42.7 56.6 56.6 56.6
Grd Flr 36.4 37703 13631 565.5 21.3 28.3 28.3 28.3
Summary of Horizontal Loading

Vertical Loading - Wall on Grid D


Overall length = 6.39 Centreline length = 6.14

Equivalent trapezoidal loading


kN/m
Left Right
Dead 75.0 -14.5
Total load Dead only Imposed 52.1 -12.0
Add stairs 6.03
5.61
Project name Project No

CiD
BS8110 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Wall Loading 32
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Vertical Loading - Wall on Grid D/E


Overall length = 6.39 Centreline length = 6.14

Equivalent trapezoidal loading


kN/m
Left Right
Total load Dead only Dead 47.0 1.0
Imposed 32.2 -5.2
Add stairs 6.03
Vertical Loading - Wall on Grid 3/4 5.61
Overall length = 2.84

Equivalent trapezoidal loading


kN/m
Left Right
Dead 53.20 31.50
Imposed 39.20 11.20

Total load Dead only

Vertical Loading - Wall on Grid 6


Overall length = 2.84

Equivalent trapezoidal loading


kN/m
Left Right
Total load Dead only Dead 1.20 -0.90
Imposed 0.50 -0.60
Project name Project No

CiD
BS8110 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Wall Design 33
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW
Summary of Results
T12 @ 225
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Similar analysis to EC2 design

T16 @ 200

T20 @ 200

T12 @ 150
Vertical Steel
Basement Level

T25 @ 150
T12 @ 200 T12 @ 225

T25 @ 150
T16 @ 200
Core Wall model, including
T16 @ 200
imperfections & pD
T20 @ 200
T25 @ 150

T25 @ 150
T12 @ 175

T12 @ 225
T16 @ 150 T12 @ 225

Vertical Steel
T12 @ 175 Grnd - 1st

T12 @ 225

T12 @ 175

T12 @ 225
T12 @ 225 throughout
Vertical Steel
1st - 2nd
Vertical Steel
Grnd - 1st

Horizontal Reinforcement Lintels


Grnd to 1st = 1 T25EF T&B
Ground floor transfer 1st to 2nd = 1 T25EF T&B
2 T32 + 1 T25 Btm in each wall 2nd to 3rd = 1 T25EF Btm, 1 T20EF Top
T8 @ 300 EF above T8 @ 300 EF between.
Project name Project No

CiD
BS8110 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Retaining Walls 34
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW
Wall on Grid A
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

IDEALISED STRUCTURE and FORCE DIAGRAMS DESIGN STATUS : VALID

DIMENSIONS (mm)
H= 3810 B= 1800 Tw = 300
Hw = 1143 BI = 450 Tb = 350
He = 3800

MATERIAL PROPERTIES
fcu = 40 N/mm
2
gm = 1.50 concrete
fy = 460 N/mm
2
gm = 1.05 steel
Cover to tension reinforcement (co) = 40 mm
Max. allowable design surface crack width (W) = 0.3 mm (0.2 or 0.3 mm
only)
Concrete density = 24.0 kN/m3 Wall Geometry

SOIL PROPERTIES
Design angle of int'l friction of retained mat'l (Ø) = 30 degree
Design cohesion of retained mat'l (C ) = 0 kN/m2 (Only granular backfill considered, ie "C" = 0)
Density of retained mat'l (q ) = 20 kN/m3
Submerged Density of retained mat'l (qs ) = 13.33 kN/m3 (default=2/3 of q), only apply when Hw >0
Design angle of int'l friction of base mat'l (Øb) = 20 degree = 13.33
Design cohesion of base mat'l (Cb ) = 0 kN/m2 ASSUMPTIONS
Density of base mat'l (qb ) = 10 kN/m3 a) Wall friction is zero
Allowable gross ground bearing pressure (GBP) = 600 kN/m2 b) Minimum active earth pressure = 0.25qH
LOADINGS (unfactored) c) Granular backfill
Surcharge load -- live (SQK) = 10 kN/m2 h) Design not intended for walls over 3.5 m high
Surcharge load -- dead (SGK) = 5 kN/m2 i)Does not include check for temp or shrinkage effects
Line load -- live (LQK) = 0 kN/m
Line load -- dead (LGK) = 0 kN/m
Distance of line load from wall (X) = 250 mm
Wall load -- live (WQK) = 49.90 kN/m
Wall load -- Dead (WGK) = 194.90 kN/m

LATERAL FORCES Ko = 0.50 default Ko = (1-SIN Ø) = 0.50


Kac = 1.41 = 2Ko0.5

Force (kN) Lever arm (m) gf Ultimate Force (kN)


PE = 70.02 LE = 1.294 1.40 98.03
PS(GK) = 9.50 LS = 1.90 1.40 13.30
PS(QK) = 19.00 LS = 1.90 1.60 30.40
PL(GK) = 0.00 LL = 3.59 1.40 0.00
PL(QK) = 0.00 LL = 3.59 1.60 0.00
PW = 6.53 LW = 0.38 1.40 9.15
Total 105.05 150.87
Project name Project No

CiD
BS8110 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Retaining Walls 35
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW
Wall on Grid A
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

EXTERNAL STABILITY STABILITY CHECK : OK

ANALYSIS - Assumptions & Notes

1) Wall idealised as a propped cantilever ( i.e. pinned at top and fixed at base )
2) Wall is braced.
3) Maximum slenderness of wall is limited to 15, i.e [ 0.9*(He-Tb/2)/Tw < 15 ]
4) Maximum Ultimate axial load on wall is limited to 0.1fcu times the wall cross-sectional area
5) Design Span (Effective wall height) = He - (Tb/2)
6) -ve moment is hogging ( i.e. tension at external face of wall )
+ve moment is sagging ( i.e. tension at internal face of wall )
7) " Wall MT. " is maximum +ve moment on the wall.
8) Estimated lateral deflections are used for checking the PD effect .

UNFACTORED LOADS AND FORCES

Force Lever arm Base MT. Wall MT. Reaction at Reaction at Estimated Elastic
Lateral Force (kN) to base (m) (kNm) (kNm) Base (kN) Top (kN) Deflection D (mm)
PE = 64.14 1.23 -31.45 14.36 51.09 13.05 0.5
PS(GK) = 9.06 1.81 -4.13 2.32 5.68 3.38 0.1
PS(QK) = 18.12 1.81 -8.26 4.65 11.36 6.77 0.1
PL(GK) = 0.00 3.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
PL(QK) = 0.00 3.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
PW = 4.69 0.32 -1.23 0.22 4.61 0.08 0.0
Total 96.01 -45.06 21.54 72.73 23.28 0.7

GROUND BEARING FAILURE


LOAD CASE: Wall Load MAX 1
Taking moments about centre of base (anticlockwise "+") Surcharge MIN 0

Vertical FORCES (kN) Lever arm (m) Moment (kNm) BEARING PRESSURE (kN/m ²)
Wall load = 244.8 0.30 73.44 0.00 1.80
0
Wall (sw) = 24.91 0.30 7.47
Base = 15.12 0.00 0.00 50

Earth = 28.67 0.68 19.35 100

Water = 3.57 0.68 2.41 150


Surcharge = 2.25 0.68 1.52 200
Line load = 0.00 0.70 0.00 250
åV= 319.32 å Mv = 104.19 300

350
MOMENT due to LATERAL FORCES, Mo = -36.80 kNm

RESULTANT MOMEN T, M = Mv + Mo = 67.39 kNm

ECCENTRICITY FROM BASE CENTRE, M / V = 0.21 m


2
MAXIMUM GROSS BEARING PRESSURE = 302.20 kN/m < 600 OK

SLIDING AT BASE (using overall factor of safety instead of partial safety factor) F.O.S = 1.50

SUM of LATERAL FORCES, P = 72.73 kN


BASE FRICTION, Fb = - ( V TANØb + B.Cb ) = -116.22 kN

Factor of Safety, Fb / P = 1.60 > 1.50 OK


Project name Project No

CiD
BS8110 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Retaining Walls 36
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW
Wall on Grid A
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

STRUCTURAL DESIGNS (ultimate) DESIGN CHECKS : OK


BS8110
WALL ( per metre length ) reference
AXIAL LOAD CAPACITY ( Limited to 0.1fcu ) = 1200.00 kN > 352.7 OK 3.4.4.1

Force gf Ultimate Ult. Moment Ult. Shear Ult. Shear


Lateral Force (kN) Force (kN) at base (kNm) at base (kN) at top (kN)
PE = 64.14 1.40 89.80 -44.02 71.53 18.27
PS(GK) = 9.06 1.40 12.69 -5.78 7.95 4.74
PS(QK) = 18.12 1.60 29.00 -13.21 18.17 10.83
PL(GK) = 0.00 1.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
PL(QK) = 0.00 1.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
PW = 4.69 1.40 6.56 -1.72 6.45 0.11
Total 96.01 138.04 -64.73 104.10 33.94

EXT MOMENT (kNm) INT


Design Bending Moments
-100 -50 0 50
0.00
On INTERNAL face due to lateral forces, M int = 30.45 kNm
On EXTERNAL face due to lateral forces, M ext = -64.73 kNm
0.73
top >

Eccentricity of Axial Loads = 125 mm


LATERAL DEFLECTION " D " = 0.7 mm
1.45
Due to eccentricity of axial loads, Mecc = 44.1 kNm
WALL (m)

Due to PD effect, Mp = 0.26 kNm


2.18

Total Mmt on INTERNAL face (Mint+0.5Mecc+Mp) = 52.8 kNm


< base

2.91
Total Mmt on EXTERNAL face (M ext+0.5Mecc) = -86.8 kNm
3.64

EXTERNAL FACE INTERNAL FACE


WALL REINFORCEMENT : Min. As = 390 390 mm2 Table 3.25
f= 16 12 mm
centres = 225 < 483 225 < 762 mm OK 3.12.11.2.7(b)
As = 894 > 390 503 > 390 mm2 OK
MOMENT of RESISTANCE : d= 252 254 mm
z= 239 241 mm 3.4.4.4
As' = 0 0 mm2 3.4.4.4
Mres = 93.7 > 86.78 53.1 > 52.76 kNm OK

BASE of WALL TOP of WALL


SHEAR RESISTANCE: As = 894 f= 10 @225 mm = 349 mm2/m
100As/bd = 0.35% = 0.14%
2
vc = 0.59 0.43 N/mm Table 3.8
Vres = 148.0 > 104.10 108.5 > 33.94 kN OK 3.5.5.2

CRACK WIDTH to BS8100/8 007 X= 68.05 mm em = 0.00057 BS8007


Temp & shrinkage effects not included Acr = 114.31 mm W= 0.12 < 0.30 mm OK App. B.2

REINFORCEMENT SUMMARY for WALL


Type f centres As Min. As
2 2
mm mm mm mm
INTERNAL FACE T 12 225 503 390 OK
EXTERNAL FACE T 16 225 894 390 OK
TRANSVERSE T 10 200 393 390 OK
Project name Project No

CiD
BS8110 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Retaining Walls 37
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW
Wall on Grid A
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

OUTER BASE ( per metre length ) BS8110


gf = 1.50 (ASSUMED) reference
Ult. Shear = 41.20 kN (AT d from FACE of WALL)
Ult. MT. = 32.68 kNm TENSION - BOTTOM FA CE

BOTTOM REINFORCEMENT : Min. As = 455 mm


2
Table 3.25
f= 12 mm
centres = 225 mm < 762 OK
2
As = 503 mm > 455 OK

MOMENT of RESISTANCE : d= 304 mm


Z= 289 mm 3.4.4.4
2
As' = 0 mm
Mres = 63.60 kNm > 32.68 OK

SHEAR RESISTANCE: 100As/bd = 0.20%


vc = 0.43 N/mm2 Table 3.8
Vres = 132.10 kN > 41.20 OK 3.5.5.2

CHECK CRACK WIDTH IN ACCORDANCE WITH BS8100/8007 : Temp & shrinkage effects not included
X= 58.91 mm em = -0.00081 BS8007
Acr = 115.54 mm W= -0.19 mm < 0.30 OK App. B.2
NO CRACKING

INNER BASE ( per metre length )


Ult. Shear = -101.95 kN (AT d from FACE of WALL)
Ult. MT. = 100.27 kNm TENSION - BOTTOM FA CE

2
BOTTOM REINFORCEMENT : Min. As = 455 mm Table 3.25
f= 16 mm
centres = 250 mm < 596 OK
As = 804 mm2 > 455 OK

MOMENT of RESISTANCE : d= 302 mm


Z= 287 mm
2
As' = 0 mm
Mres = 101.09 kNm < 100.27 OK 3.4.4.4

SHEAR RESISTANCE: 100As/bd = 0.27%


vc = 0.51 N/mm2 Table 3.8
Vres = 154.08 kN > 101.95 OK 3.5.5.2

CHECK CRACK WIDTH IN ACCORDANCE WITH BS8100/8007 : Temp & shrinkage effects not included
X= 72.16 mm em = 0.000763 BS8007
Acr = 125.90 mm W= 0.17 mm < 0.30 OK App. B.2

REINFORCEMENT SUMMARY for BASE


Type f centres As Min. As
mm mm mm2 mm2
TOP T 12 225 503 455 OK
BOTTOM T 16 250 503 455 OK
TRANSVERSE T 12 225 503 455 OK
Project name Project No

CiD
BS8110 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Pad Foundations 38
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.
Project name Project No

CiD
BS8110 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Pad Foundations 39
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.
Project name Project No

CiD
BS8110 Comparative Design 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Pad Foundations 40
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design June 2002
RMW
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.
Comparative Design Study
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

to
EC2 & BS8110
of a
Typical RC Framed Structure

Reinforcement
Drawings

July 2002
EC2/BS8110 Comparative Design Study

2 4 6

11 T12.01.225
11T12.01.225
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

A
64 T12.20.275 U-bars

48 T12.21.275 U-bars
63 T12.12.275
19 T12.01.200

19 T12.01.200
B

42 T12.02.275
24 T12.01.225

24 T12.01.225

58 T12.13.225
8 T12.14.200
9 T12.15.275

7 T12.07.275
C
24 T20.03.150

14 T12.20.275
U-bars
D
22 T12.13.175
42 T12.21.275 U-bars

4 T12.08.275
24 T12.04.200

6 T12.09.275

12 T12.20.275
U-bars
19 T12.10.275

19 T12.13.250
16 T16.16.150
14 T16.05.225

17 T12.17.275

E
14 T12.11a-n.275
16 T16.06a-c.250

34 T12.19.275
32 T12.18.275

F
66 T12.20.275 U-bars

1 3 5

NS steel in B1 layer
EW steel in B2 layer
TYPICAL FLOOR - BOTTOM STEEL
25mm cover EC2 DESIGN (260 slab)
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

25mm cover
26 T20.38

7 T16.40.125
21 T12.45

39 T20.32

NS steel in T1 layer
50 T12.42.275

28 T12.44.275

33 T12.45.275

EW steel in T2 layer
75

1
14 T12.22.275
12 T12.22.275
8 T20.05.100 10 T20.05.100 9 T12.21.275

(4)
150
54 T12.17.275

9@200
(6)
(11)
125

200

150
125 70 125 49 T20.01 200 100 200 24 T20.01 250 9 T16.02
10 T12.54.275 7 T12.23
275

38 T12.48.275

16 T12.53.275
80
100
(3)
33 T12.24.275
2

17 T12.19.275 6 T12.19.275 8 T20.29.114

150
200

30 T20.38

225

110
5 T20.41.225
10 T20.06 150 80 150 34 T20.06

150

(3)
12 @ 275

3(14)
4(15)
5(16)
3 T20.13.200 12 T16.14-16.250

75
30 T20.30

(12)
(22)

3
45 T12.17.275
7 T12.07.175

(3)
150
2 T20.11

125
200

175 90 175 27 T20.01 250 9 T16.02


6 T20.12.200
12T12.28.275
100
(3)
4

20 T20.35.150
9 T20.10.125
22 T12.46.275

6 T12.27.275 9 T12.26.275 22 T12.19.275 6 T12.19.275 8 T20.29.114


200

3 T12.25.275
5 T16.09.200
EC2/BS8110 Comparative Design Study

(15)

5
(8)

47 T12.18.275
3 T16.08.200
30 T20.30

10 T16.04.150 10 T16.04.150 6 T12.03.150


(3)
6

17 T12.20.275 12 T12.20.275
8 T20.29.114
(2)

(2)

6 T12.34.250

12 T16.36.150

13 T12.52.275
11 T16.39.200
6 T12.50.275
8 T12.49.275
7 T12.51.275
15 T20.37.150
9 T12.47.275

F
E
D
C
B
A

9 T12.43.275

13 T16.31.150

16 T16.33.150

EC2 DESIGN (260 slab)


TYPICAL FLOOR - TOP STEEL
EC2/BS8110 Comparative Design Study

2 4 6

14 T12.01.175
14T12.01.175
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

A
60 T12.20.300 U-bars

44 T12.21.300 U-bars
77 T12.12.225
34 T12.01.150

34 T12.01.150
B

58 T12.02.200
30 T12.01.175

30 T12.01.175

58 T16.13.225
8 T12.14.200
12 T12.15.200

9 T12.07.200
C
17 T20.03.175

13 T12.20.300
U-bars
D
16 T16.13.250
39 T12.21.300 U-bars

7 T12.08.200
20 T16.04.250

8 T12.09.200

11 T12.20.300
U-bars
26 T126.10.200

23 T12.13.200
16 T16.16.150
16 T16.05.200

17 T12.17.275

E
15 T12.11.250

34 T12.19.275
19 T16.06.200

35 T12.18.250

F
61 T12.20.300 U-bars

1 3 5

NS steel in B1 layer
EW steel in B2 layer
TYPICAL FLOOR - BOTTOM STEEL
20 mm cover BS 8110 DESIGN (280 slab)
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

25mm cover
25 T25.55

7 T16.40.125
30 T16.56

30 T20.32

NS steel in T1 layer
EW steel in T2 layer
46 T12.42.300

26 T12.44.300

30 T12.45.300

75

1
19 T12.22.200
17 T12.22.200
5 T20.05.200 8 T20.05.115 9 T12.21.275

(3)
175
54 T12.17.275

6@275
(6)
(10)
125

225
275 125 200 250

200
125 70 125 49 T20.01 22 T20.01 9 T16.02
9 T12.54.300 7 T12.23
275

35 T12.48.300

20 T12.53.225
100
100
(2)
33 T12.24.275
2

17 T12.19.275 8 T12.19.225 9 T16.29.100

225

200

20 T20.38

300

150
6 T16.41.175
8 T20.06 200 100 200 28 T20.06

250

(3)
14 @ 250

3(14)
4(15)
5(16)
3 T20.13.200 12 T16.14-16.250
29 T20.30

(11)

125
(20)

3
45 T12.17.275
5 T16.07.275

(3)
250
2 T20.11

150
225

275 125 200 22 T20.01 300 8 T16.02


6 T20.12.200
12T12.28.275
100
(2)
4

20 T20.35.150
9 T20.10.125
20 T12.46.300

6 T12.27.275 9 T12.26.275 22 T12.19.275 9 T16.29.100


8 T12.19.250
225

3 T12.25.275
5 T16.09.200
EC2/BS8110 Comparative Design Study

(14)

5
(6)

47 T12.18.275
3 T16.08.200
29 T20.30

10 T16.04.150 10 T16.04.150 6 T12.03.150


(2)
6

23 T12.20.200 14 T12.20.225
9 T16.29.100
(2)

(2)

6 T12.34.250

9 T16.36.225

12 T12.52.300
11 T16.39.200
6 T12.50.300
7 T12.49.300
6 T12.51.300
15 T20.37.150

F
E
D
C
B
A

13 T16.31.150

8 T12.47.300
6 T12.43.300

16 T16.33.150

BS 8110 DESIGN (280 slab)


TYPICAL FLOOR - TOP STEEL
Comparative Design Study
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

to
EC2 & BS8110
of a
Typical RC Framed Structure

Material
Quantities

July 2002
Project name Project No

CiD
Comparative
EC2 Comparative
Design Design
Study 2156
Part of structure Calc sheet No
Summary of Quantities
Drawing ref Calculations by Checked by Date
Concrete Innovation & Design
RMW July 2002
Summary of Quantities
Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

To Eurocode 2
Concrete Rebar Excavate
Element 3 H Form V Form 3
Vol m 2 2 Tonnes m
m m
Slabs G-8 819.1 3115.4 236.5 89.33 -
Roof Slab 91.0 346.2 26.3 8.44 -
Beams 13.6 55.0 66.0 0.81 -
Columns 76.9 - 712.1 10.63 -
Shear Walls 135.9 2.0 506.5 10.45 -
Retaining walls 94.2 - 333.9 6.92 44.1
Pad Bases 37.0 - - 2.28 37.0

S 1267.8 3518.6 1881.3 128.9 81.1

Cost £ 88744 65517 49856 64432 3243

£271,792

To BS 8110
Concrete Rebar Excavate
Element 3 H Form V Form 3
Vol m 2 2 Tonnes m
m m
Slabs G-8 882.1 3114.5 254.7 83.15 -
Roof Slab 98.0 346.1 28.3 7.85 -
Beams 12.5 55.0 60.5 0.96 -
Columns 81.0 - 773.4 9.06 -
Shear Walls 135.3 2.0 501.6 8.00 -
Retaining walls 89.7 - 331.7 7.33 40.0
Pad Bases 36.4 - - 1.61 36.4

S 1335.1 3517.5 1950.2 118.0 76.4

Cost £ 93458 65496 51681 58982 3055

£272,672
EC2 Floor Slab

Rev
CID Bar schedule ref : 001 01 letter

Site ref : EC2 Floor Plate Date prepared : 28-Jul-02

Job no : 2156 Prepared by : RMW Checked by :


Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Member Bar mark Type and No. No. of Total no. Length Shape Rev
size of bars of each code A* B* C* D* E/R * letter
mbrs in bar †
each mm mm mm mm mm mm

Bottom Bars 01 T 12 1 81 81 7100 00 7100

02 T 12 1 42 42 6850 00 6850

03 T 20 1 24 24 3550 00 3550

04 T 12 1 24 24 8350 00 8350

05 T 16 1 14 14 7400 00 7400

06 T 16 1 16 16 7250 00 7250

07 T 12 1 7 7 11250 00 11250

08 T 12 1 4 4 4300 00 4300

09 T 12 1 6 6 3050 00 3050

10 T 12 1 19 19 6625 00 6625

11 T 12 1 14 14 6375 00 6375

12 T 12 1 63 63 4100 00 4100

13 T 12 1 99 99 7525 00 7525

14 T 12 1 8 8 7525 00 7525

15 T 12 1 9 9 6325 00 6325

16 T 16 1 16 16 7525 00 7525

17 T 12 1 17 17 4850 00 4850

18 T 12 1 32 32 4200 00 4200

19 T 12 1 34 34 2750 00 2750

20 T 12 1 156 156 1325 13 600 210 600

21 T 12 1 90 90 1300 13 600 180 600

This schedule complies with BS 8666:2000 3541 kg Bar Schedule 8666

* Specified i n multipl es of 5mm. † Specified i n multipl es of 25mm. © 2000-2001 Chris Buczkowski


EC2 Floor Slab

Rev
CID Bar schedule ref : 002 01 letter

Site ref : EC2 Floor Plate Date prepared : 28-Jul-02

Job no : 2156 Prepared by : RMW Checked by :


Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Member Bar mark Type and No. No. of Total no. Length Shape Rev
size of bars of each code A* B* C* D* E/R * letter
mbrs in bar †
each mm mm mm mm mm mm

Top Bars 01 T 20 1 100 100 3600 00 3600

02 T 16 1 18 18 3600 00 3600

03 T 12 1 6 6 2750 00 2750

04 T 16 1 20 20 2750 00 2750

05 T 20 1 18 18 3025 13 2265 195 675

06 T 20 1 44 44 3675 00 3675

07 T 12 1 7 7 3675 00 3675

08 T 16 1 3 3 2800 13 2225 195 475

09 T 16 1 5 5 3875 00 3875

10 T 20 1 9 9 4850 00 4850

11 T 20 1 2 2 2300 00 2300

12 T 20 1 6 6 5200 00 5200

13 T 20 1 3 3 4400 00 4400

14 T 16 1 3 3 4400 00 4400

15 T 16 1 4 4 2250 00 2250

16 T 16 1 5 5 2700 00 2700

17 T 12 1 72 72 4000 00 4000

18 T 12 1 47 47 2650 00 2650

19 T 12 1 51 51 4300 00 4300

20 T 12 1 29 29 2975 00 2975

21 T 12 1 9 9 3450 00 3450

22 T 12 1 26 26 2350 00 2350

23 T 12 1 7 7 4550 00 4550
This schedule complies with BS 8666:2000 Bar Schedule 8666

* Specified i n multipl es of 5mm. † Specified i n multipl es of 25mm. © 2000-2001 Chris Buczkowski


EC2 Floor Slab

Rev
CID Bar schedule ref : 002 02 letter

Site ref : EC2 Floor Plate Date prepared : 28-Jul-02

Job no : 2156 Prepared by : RMW Checked by :


Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Member Bar mark Type and No. No. of Total no. Length Shape Rev
size of bars of each code A* B* C* D* E/R * letter
mbrs in bar †
each mm mm mm mm mm mm

Top Bars 24 T 12 1 33 33 5200 00 5200

continued 25 T 12 1 3 3 4400 00 4400

26 T 12 1 9 9 9500 00 9500

27 T 12 1 6 6 5675 00 5675

28 T 12 1 12 12 4025 00 4025

29 T 20 1 24 24 2225 13 1450 210 675

30 T 20 1 60 60 3675 00 3675

31 T 16 1 13 13 3675 00 3675

32 T 20 1 39 39 4600 00 4600

33 T 16 1 16 16 2425 13 1825 210 500

34 T 12 1 6 6 3000 13 2575 210 320

35 T 20 1 20 20 3350 00 3350

36 T 16 1 12 12 3200 13 2575 210 515

37 T 16 1 15 15 2000 00 2000

38 T 20 1 56 56 4225 00 4225

39 T 16 1 11 11 2250 00 2250

40 T 16 1 7 7 3575 13 2975 210 500

41 T 20 1 5 5 3150 13 2375 210 675

42 T 12 1 50 50 3275 00 3275

43 T 12 1 9 9 2375 00 2375

44 T 12 1 28 28 4000 00 4000

45 T 12 1 54 54 5000 00 5000

46 T 12 1 22 22 5300 00 5300
This schedule complies with BS 8666:2000 Bar Schedule 8666

* Specified i n multipl es of 5mm. † Specified i n multipl es of 25mm. © 2000-2001 Chris Buczkowski


EC2 Floor Slab

Rev
CID Bar schedule ref : 002 03 letter

Site ref : EC2 Floor Plate Date prepared : 28-Jul-02

Job no : 2156 Prepared by : RMW Checked by :


Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Member Bar mark Type and No. No. of Total no. Length Shape Rev
size of bars of each code A* B* C* D* E/R * letter
mbrs in bar †
each mm mm mm mm mm mm

Top Bars 47 T 12 1 9 9 4050 00 4050

continued 48 T 12 1 38 38 4250 00 4250

49 T 12 1 8 8 8500 00 8500

50 T 12 1 6 6 8200 00 8200

51 T 12 1 7 7 4650 00 4650

52 T 12 1 13 13 1700 00 1700

53 T 12 1 16 16 7275 00 7275

54 T 12 1 10 10 3375 13 2950 210 320

Links 55 T 10 3 36 108 525 31 120 120 210 120

56 T 6 3 27 81 475 31 110 75 210 110

This schedule complies with BS 8666:2000 6385 kg Bar Schedule 8666

* Specified i n multipl es of 5mm. † Specified i n multipl es of 25mm. © 2000-2001 Chris Buczkowski


BS 8110 Floor Slab

Rev
CID Bar schedule ref : 003 01 letter

Site ref : BS 8110 Floor Plate Date prepared : 28-Jul-02

Job no : 2156 Prepared by : RMW Checked by :


Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Member Bar mark Type and No. No. of Total no. Length Shape Rev
size of bars of each code A* B* C* D* E/R * letter
mbrs in bar †
each mm mm mm mm mm mm

Bottom Bars 01 T 12 1 159 159 7100 00 7100

02 T 12 1 58 58 6850 00 6850

03 T 20 1 17 17 3550 00 3550

04 T 16 1 20 20 8350 00 8350

05 T 16 1 16 16 7400 00 7400

06 T 16 1 19 19 7250 00 7250

07 T 12 1 9 9 11250 00 11250

08 T 12 1 7 7 4300 00 4300

09 T 12 1 8 8 3050 00 3050

10 T 12 1 26 26 6625 00 6625

11 T 12 1 15 15 6375 00 6375

12 T 12 1 77 77 4100 00 4100

13 T 16 1 97 97 7525 00 7525

14 T 12 1 8 8 7525 00 7525

15 T 12 1 12 12 6325 00 6325

16 T 16 1 16 16 7525 00 7525

17 T 12 1 17 17 4850 00 4850

18 T 12 1 35 35 4200 00 4200

19 T 12 1 34 34 2750 00 2750

20 T 12 1 145 145 1300 13 600 235 575

21 T 12 1 83 83 1275 13 600 205 575

This schedule complies with BS 8666:2000 4839 kg Bar Schedule 8666

* Specified i n multipl es of 5mm. † Specified i n multipl es of 25mm. © 2000-2001 Chris Buczkowski


BS 8110 Floor Slab

Rev
CID Bar schedule ref : 004 01 letter

Site ref : BS 8110 Floor Plate Date prepared : 28-Jul-02

Job no : 2156 Prepared by : RMW Checked by :


Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Member Bar mark Type and No. No. of Total no. Length Shape Rev
size of bars of each code A* B* C* D* E/R * letter
mbrs in bar †
each mm mm mm mm mm mm

Top Bars 01 T 20 1 93 93 3600 00 3600

02 T 16 1 18 18 3600 00 3600

03 T 12 1 6 6 2750 00 2750

04 T 16 1 20 20 2750 00 2750

05 T 20 1 13 13 3025 13 2265 205 660

06 T 20 1 36 36 3675 00 3675

07 T 16 1 5 5 3675 00 3675

08 T 16 1 3 3 2800 13 2225 205 460

09 T 16 1 5 5 3875 00 3875

10 T 20 1 9 9 4850 00 4850

11 T 20 1 2 2 2300 00 2300

12 T 20 1 6 6 5200 00 5200

13 T 20 1 3 3 4400 00 4400

14 T 16 1 3 3 4400 00 4400

15 T 16 1 4 4 2250 00 2250

16 T 16 1 5 5 2700 00 2700

17 T 12 1 72 72 4000 00 4000

18 T 12 1 47 47 2650 00 2650

19 T 12 1 55 55 4300 00 4300

20 T 12 1 37 37 2975 00 2975

21 T 12 1 9 9 3450 00 3450

22 T 12 1 36 36 2350 00 2350

23 T 12 1 7 7 4550 00 4550
This schedule complies with BS 8666:2000 Bar Schedule 8666

* Specified i n multipl es of 5mm. † Specified i n multipl es of 25mm. © 2000-2001 Chris Buczkowski


BS 8110 Floor Slab

Rev
CID Bar schedule ref : 004 02 letter

Site ref : BS 8110 Floor Plate Date prepared : 28-Jul-02

Job no : 2156 Prepared by : RMW Checked by :


Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Member Bar mark Type and No. No. of Total no. Length Shape Rev
size of bars of each code A* B* C* D* E/R * letter
mbrs in bar †
each mm mm mm mm mm mm

Top Bars 24 T 12 1 33 33 5200 00 5200

continued 25 T 12 1 3 3 4400 00 4400

26 T 12 1 9 9 9500 00 9500

27 T 12 1 6 6 5675 00 5675

28 T 12 1 12 12 4025 00 4025

29 T 16 1 27 27 2075 13 1450 235 500

30 T 20 1 58 58 3675 00 3675

31 T 16 1 13 13 3675 00 3675

32 T 20 1 30 30 4600 00 4600

33 T 16 1 16 16 2450 13 1825 235 500

34 T 12 1 6 6 3025 13 2575 235 320

35 T 20 1 20 20 3350 00 3350

36 T 16 1 9 9 3200 13 2575 235 500

37 T 20 1 15 15 2000 00 2000

38 T 20 1 20 20 4225 00 4225

39 T 16 1 11 11 2250 00 2250

40 T 16 1 7 7 3600 13 2975 235 500

41 T 20 1 6 6 3150 13 2375 235 660

42 T 12 1 46 46 3275 00 3275

43 T 12 1 6 6 2375 00 2375

44 T 12 1 26 26 4000 00 4000

45 T 12 1 30 30 5000 00 5000

46 T 12 1 20 20 5300 00 5300
This schedule complies with BS 8666:2000 Bar Schedule 8666

* Specified i n multipl es of 5mm. † Specified i n multipl es of 25mm. © 2000-2001 Chris Buczkowski


BS 8110 Floor Slab

Rev
CID Bar schedule ref : 004 03 letter

Site ref : BS 8110 Floor Plate Date prepared : 28-Jul-02

Job no : 2156 Prepared by : RMW Checked by :


Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Member Bar mark Type and No. No. of Total no. Length Shape Rev
size of bars of each code A* B* C* D* E/R * letter
mbrs in bar †
each mm mm mm mm mm mm

Top Bars 47 T 12 1 8 8 4050 00 4050

continued 48 T 12 1 35 35 4250 00 4250

49 T 12 1 7 7 8500 00 8500

50 T 12 1 6 6 8200 00 8200

51 T 12 1 6 6 4650 00 4650

52 T 12 1 12 12 1700 00 1700

53 T 12 1 20 20 7275 00 7275

54 T 12 1 9 9 3400 13 2950 235 320

55 T 25 1 25 25 4225 00 4225

56 T 16 1 30 30 5000 00 5000

Links 57 T 10 3 42 126 550 31 120 120 235 120

This schedule complies with BS 8666:2000 4400 kg Bar Schedule 8666

* Specified i n multipl es of 5mm. † Specified i n multipl es of 25mm. © 2000-2001 Chris Buczkowski


EC2 Columns

Rev
XY and partners Bar schedule ref : 004 01 letter

Site ref : EC2 Columns Date prepared : 31-Jul-02

Job no : 2156 Prepared by : RMW Checked by :


Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Member Bar mark Type and No. No. of Total no. Length Shape Rev
size of bars of each code A* B* C* D* E/R * letter
mbrs in bar †
each mm mm mm mm mm mm

A2 & A4 01 T 16 2 4 8 4250 11 3560 705

400x400 02 T 12 10 4 40 4300 26 3300 300 695 30

03 T 12 6 4 24 4150 26 3300 300 530 30

04 T 12 18 14 252 1275 00 1275

05 T 6 2 158 316 1525 51 340 340 110

B2 06 T 20 1 6 6 4450 11 3560 935

500x500 02 T 12 3 6 18 4300 26 3300 300 695 30

07 T 16 1 6 6 4300 26 3300 300 695 35

08 T 25 1 6 6 4525 26 3275 325 925 50

09 T 12 1 6 6 4150 26 3300 300 530 40

10 T 16 1 6 6 4150 26 3300 300 530 35

11 T 25 1 6 6 4325 26 3275 325 705 50

12 T 32 1 6 6 4700 26 3180 420 1100 65

13 T 32 1 6 6 2650 11 2425 305

14 T 6 1 64 64 1925 51 440 440 110

15 T 8 1 44 44 1925 51 440 440 115

17 T 6 1 64 64 650 21 110 440 110

18 T 8 1 44 44 650 21 115 440 115

This schedule complies with BS 8666:2000 Bar Schedule 8666

* Specified i n multipl es of 5mm. † Specified i n multipl es of 25mm. © 2000-2001 Chris Buczkowski


EC2 Columns

Rev
XY and partners Bar schedule ref : 004 letter

Site ref : EC2 Columns Date prepared : 31-Jul-02

Job no : 2156 Prepared by : RMW Checked by :


Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Member Bar mark Type and No. No. of Total no. Length Shape Rev
size of bars of each code A* B* C* D* E/R * letter
mbrs in bar †
each mm mm mm mm mm mm

B4 19 T 32 1 4 4 5100 11 3560 1625

500x500 20 T 20 1 8 8 4775 26 3300 300 1155 40

21 T 16 1 8 8 4525 26 3300 300 925 35

22 T 32 1 4 4 4525 26 3180 420 925 65

23 T 16 1 8 8 4325 26 3300 300 705 35

24 T 25 1 8 8 4325 26 3275 325 705 50

25 T 25 1 4 4 2175 11 2000 240

14 T 6 1 78 78 1925 51 440 440 110

15 T 8 1 44 44 1925 51 440 440 115

B6 26 T 16 1 4 4 4250 11 3560 705

400x400 27 T 12 1 20 20 4300 26 3300 300 695 30

28 T 12 1 8 8 4150 26 3300 300 530 30

29 T 16 1 4 4 4150 26 3300 300 530 35

30 T 16 1 4 4 1575 00 1575

05 T 6 1 154 154 1525 51 340 340 110

This schedule complies with BS 8666:2000 Bar Schedule 8666

* Specified i n multipl es of 5mm. † Specified i n multipl es of 25mm. © 2000-2001 Chris Buczkowski


EC2 Columns

Rev
XY and partners Bar schedule ref : 004 letter

Site ref : EC2 Columns Date prepared : 31-Jul-02

Job no : 2156 Prepared by : RMW Checked by :


Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Member Bar mark Type and No. No. of Total no. Length Shape Rev
size of bars of each code A* B* C* D* E/R * letter
mbrs in bar †
each mm mm mm mm mm mm

D2 31 T 12 1 6 6 4025 11 3560 475

500x500 32 T 12 1 12 12 4300 26 3300 300 695 30

33 T 16 1 6 6 4525 26 3300 300 925 35

34 T 32 1 16 16 5450 26 3180 420 1845 65

35 T 20 1 10 10 4500 26 3300 300 880 55

36 T 25 1 10 10 4500 26 3275 325 880 50

37 T 32 1 22 22 5025 26 3180 420 1410 65

38 T 32 1 12 12 2850 11 2625 305

14 T 6 1 79 79 1925 51 440 440 110

15 T 8 1 55 55 1925 51 440 440 115

17 T 6 1 90 90 650 21 110 440 110

18 T 8 1 88 88 650 21 115 440 115

E1 39 T 40 1 6 6 5550 11 3560 2085

450x450 40 T 40 1 18 18 5375 26 3080 520 1760 80

41 T 32 1 6 6 5450 26 3180 420 1845 65

42 T 32 1 18 18 5025 26 3180 420 1410 65

43 T 32 1 6 6 3800 00 3800

44 T 8 1 99 99 1725 51 390 390 115

45 T 8 1 99 99 600 21 115 390 115

This schedule complies with BS 8666:2000 Bar Schedule 8666

* Specified i n multipl es of 5mm. † Specified i n multipl es of 25mm. © 2000-2001 Chris Buczkowski


EC2 Columns

Rev
XY and partners Bar schedule ref : 004 letter

Site ref : EC2 Columns Date prepared : 31-Jul-02

Job no : 2156 Prepared by : RMW Checked by :


Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Member Bar mark Type and No. No. of Total no. Length Shape Rev
size of bars of each code A* B* C* D* E/R * letter
mbrs in bar †
each mm mm mm mm mm mm

E3 46 T 32 1 4 4 5100 11 3560 1625

500x500 47 T 16 1 12 12 4525 26 3300 300 925 35

48 T 20 1 4 4 4525 26 3300 300 925 40

49 T 25 1 4 4 4775 26 3275 325 1155 50

50 T 16 1 8 8 4325 26 3300 300 705 35

51 T 25 1 4 4 4325 26 3275 325 705 50

52 T 25 1 4 4 2350 00 2350

14 T 6 1 104 104 1925 51 440 440 110

15 T 8 1 33 33 1925 51 440 440 115

E5 53 T 12 1 4 4 4025 11 3560 475

400x400 54 T 12 1 20 20 4300 26 3300 300 695 25

55 T 12 1 12 12 4150 26 3300 300 530 25

56 T 12 1 4 4 1550 00 1550

14 T 6 1 162 162 1925 51 440 440 110

A6 53 T 12 1 4 4 4025 11 3560 475

350 dia 54 T 12 1 20 20 4300 26 3300 300 695 25

55 T 12 1 12 12 4150 26 3300 300 530 25

56 T 12 1 4 4 1550 00 1550

57 T 6 1 27 27 8050 77 290 110 9

This schedule complies with BS 8666:2000 Bar Schedule 8666

* Specified i n multipl es of 5mm. † Specified i n multipl es of 25mm. © 2000-2001 Chris Buczkowski


EC2 Columns

Rev
XY and partners Bar schedule ref : 004 letter

Site ref : EC2 Columns Date prepared : 31-Jul-02

Job no : 2156 Prepared by : RMW Checked by :


Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Member Bar mark Type and No. No. of Total no. Length Shape Rev
size of bars of each code A* B* C* D* E/R * letter
mbrs in bar †
each mm mm mm mm mm mm

C6 58 T 20 1 6 6 4450 11 3560 935

350 dia 59 T 20 1 12 12 4775 26 3300 300 1155 40

60 T 25 1 12 12 5100 26 3600 325 1155 50

61 T 32 1 6 6 5475 26 3600 420 1440 65

62 T 20 1 6 6 4800 26 3600 300 880 55

63 T 25 1 12 12 4825 26 3600 325 880 50

64 T 25 1 6 6 3050 00 3050

57 T 6 1 27 27 8050 77 290 110 9

F1 65 T 25 1 6 6 4725 11 3560 1220

350 dia 66 T 32 1 30 30 5050 26 3180 420 1440 65

67 T 25 1 12 12 4700 26 3275 325 1100 60

68 T 20 1 6 6 4500 26 3300 300 880 45

64 T 25 1 6 6 3050 00 3050

57 T 6 1 27 27 8050 77 290 110 9

F3 69 T 12 1 6 6 4025 11 3560 475

350 dia 70 T 16 1 30 30 4300 26 3300 300 695 35

71 T 20 1 6 6 4775 26 3300 300 1155 40

72 T 16 1 18 18 4325 26 3300 300 705 40

73 T 16 1 6 6 1575 00 1575

57 T 6 1 27 27 8050 77 290 110 9

This schedule complies with BS 8666:2000 10627 kg Bar Schedule 8666

* Specified i n multipl es of 5mm. † Specified i n multipl es of 25mm. © 2000-2001 Chris Buczkowski


BS 8110 Columns

Rev
XY and partners Bar schedule ref : 006 01 letter

Site ref : BS 8110 Columns Date prepared : 31-Jul-02

Job no : 2156 Prepared by : RMW Checked by :


Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Member Bar mark Type and No. No. of Total no. Length Shape Rev
size of bars of each code A* B* C* D* E/R * letter
mbrs in bar †
each mm mm mm mm mm mm

A2 & A4 01 T 16 2 4 8 4075 11 3560 545

375x375 02 T 16 2 20 40 4400 26 3300 300 785 35

03 T 16 2 12 24 4150 26 3300 300 530 35

04 T 16 2 14 28 1725 00 1725

05 T 6 2 162 324 1350 51 295 295 110

B2 06 T 20 1 4 4 4250 11 3560 740

550x550 02 T 20 1 20 20 4600 26 3300 300 980 40

02 T 20 1 12 12 4600 26 3300 300 980 40

08 T 32 1 4 4 4675 26 3275 420 980 65

13 T 32 1 4 4 3225 11 2995 305

14 T 6 1 126 126 2050 51 470 470 110

15 T 8 1 8 8 2050 51 470 470 115

B4 19 T 20 1 4 4 4250 11 3560 740

550x550 20 T 20 1 36 36 4600 26 3300 300 980 40

25 T 20 1 4 4 2075 11 1935 190

14 T 6 1 140 140 2050 51 470 470 110

This schedule complies with BS 8666:2000 Bar Schedule 8666

* Specified i n multipl es of 5mm. † Specified i n multipl es of 25mm. © 2000-2001 Chris Buczkowski


BS 8110 Columns

Rev
XY and partners Bar schedule ref : 006 02 letter

Site ref : BS 8110 Columns Date prepared : 31-Jul-02

Job no : 2156 Prepared by : RMW Checked by :


Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Member Bar mark Type and No. No. of Total no. Length Shape Rev
size of bars of each code A* B* C* D* E/R * letter
mbrs in bar †
each mm mm mm mm mm mm

B6 26 T 16 1 4 4 4075 11 3560 545

375x375 27 T 16 1 20 20 4400 26 3300 300 785 35

28 T 20 1 4 4 4400 26 3300 300 785 40

07 T 25 1 4 4 4625 26 3300 325 980 50

29 T 32 1 4 4 4950 26 3300 420 1225 65

30 T 32 1 4 4 3300 00 3300

05 T 6 1 108 108 1350 51 295 295 110

09 T 8 1 35 35 1350 51 295 295 115

D2 31 T 20 1 4 4 4250 11 3560 740

550x550 32 T 20 1 16 16 4600 26 3300 300 980 40

33 T 32 1 20 20 4700 26 3300 420 980 65

34 T 40 1 8 8 5275 26 3180 520 1570 80

38 T 40 1 8 8 3975 11 3695 380

14 T 6 1 84 84 2050 51 470 470 110

15 T 8 1 36 36 2050 51 470 470 115

17 T 6 1 14 14 675 21 110 470 110

18 T 8 1 36 36 675 21 115 470 115

This schedule complies with BS 8666:2000 Bar Schedule 8666

* Specified i n multipl es of 5mm. † Specified i n multipl es of 25mm. © 2000-2001 Chris Buczkowski


BS 8110 Columns

Rev
XY and partners Bar schedule ref : 006 03 letter

Site ref : BS 8110 Columns Date prepared : 31-Jul-02

Job no : 2156 Prepared by : RMW Checked by :


Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Member Bar mark Type and No. No. of Total no. Length Shape Rev
size of bars of each code A* B* C* D* E/R * letter
mbrs in bar †
each mm mm mm mm mm mm

E1 39 T 16 1 6 6 4075 11 3560 545

400x400 40 T 32 1 36 36 5075 26 3080 420 1570 65

41 T 40 1 12 12 5275 26 3180 520 1570 80

43 T 40 1 6 6 4075 00 4075

44 T 8 1 90 90 1450 51 320 320 115

45 T 8 1 90 90 525 21 115 320 115

E3 46 T 20 1 4 4 4250 11 3560 740

500x500 47 T 20 1 32 32 4600 26 3300 300 980 40

52 T 20 1 4 4 2125 00 2125

14 T 6 1 126 126 1850 51 420 420 110

E5 53 T 16 1 4 4 4075 11 3560 545

400x400 54 T 16 1 20 20 4400 26 3300 300 785 35

56 T 16 1 4 4 1725 00 1725

14 T 6 1 162 162 1450 51 320 320 110

A6 53 T 12 1 4 4 3900 11 3560 350

350 dia 54 T 12 1 20 20 4200 26 3300 300 590 25

55 T 12 1 12 12 4200 26 3300 300 590 25

56 T 12 1 4 4 1350 00 1350

57 T 6 1 27 27 7475 77 270 110 9

This schedule complies with BS 8666:2000 Bar Schedule 8666

* Specified i n multipl es of 5mm. † Specified i n multipl es of 25mm. © 2000-2001 Chris Buczkowski


BS 8110 Columns

Rev
XY and partners Bar schedule ref : 006 04 letter

Site ref : BS 8110 Columns Date prepared : 31-Jul-02

Job no : 2156 Prepared by : RMW Checked by :


Licensed copy from CIS: DUBLIN, DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 16/09/2013, Uncontrolled Copy.

Member Bar mark Type and No. No. of Total no. Length Shape Rev
size of bars of each code A* B* C* D* E/R * letter
mbrs in bar †
each mm mm mm mm mm mm

C6 58 T 16 1 6 6 4075 11 3560 545

350 dia 59 T 16 1 24 24 4400 26 3300 300 785 35

60 T 20 1 12 12 4925 26 3600 325 980 40

61 T 25 1 12 12 5000 26 3600 420 980 50

62 T 20 1 12 12 4800 26 3600 300 880 50

64 T 25 1 6 6 3050 00 3050

57 T 8 1 27 27 7425 77 270 110 9

F1 65 T 20 1 6 6 4250 11 3560 740

350 dia 66 T 25 1 30 30 4825 26 3180 420 1225 50

67 T 16 1 18 18 4375 26 3275 300 785 40

64 T 16 1 6 6 1725 00 1725

57 T 6 1 27 27 8050 77 290 110 9

F3 69 T 12 1 6 6 3900 11 3560 350

350 dia 70 T 12 1 36 36 4200 26 3300 300 590 25

71 T 20 1 6 6 4600 26 3300 300 980 40

72 T 16 1 6 6 4400 26 3300 300 785 40

73 T 16 1 6 6 1725 00 1725

57 T 6 1 27 27 8050 77 290 110 9

This schedule complies with BS 8666:2000 9056 kg Bar Schedule 8666

* Specified i n multipl es of 5mm. † Specified i n multipl es of 25mm. © 2000-2001 Chris Buczkowski

You might also like