IKEA Thumamah Project

Design Deficiency & Miscoordination Tracking sheet

DESIGN TEAM RESPONE IN RED 01/26/2020

No. Trade System Description Type Impact Status Response Cost Est. Status Reason
the word Bahrain was mentioned in two paragraphs in the
1 Electrical IPTV Notification No Impact Open NO IPTV SYSTEM IN SCOPE - Design Review
specifications Section 16700-3 - Point B.
MA Response. Jan. 15, 2020
Agreed. Ma’s oversight but is on pages 16700-2 Point
1.03B. No reference to “Bahrain” on 16700-3

1- The designer is requested to confirm the bus bar rating, taking

into consideration that the bus tie rating is 1250 A.
- Tender specifications 16341-14 dated on 20 Jan 2019 calls for a
switch gear main bus bar current of 1250 A.
- IFC specifications 16341-14 dated on 19 Mar 2019 calls for a
switch gear main bus bar current of 2500 A.
- IFC specifications 16341-4 section 2.3 dated on 19 Mar 2019
calls for a switch gear main bus bar current of 1250 A
2- The designer is requested to confirm the type of breaker
We used 1250 A Busbar with 1250 A bus coupler since it
selection acceptable for the project.
is capable of serving the load
2 Electrical MV Switch Gear The Technical Data and scope of supply in specifications 16341 Clarification No Impact Closed - No Impact Design discrepancy
Vacuum Circuit breakers were selected since they are
calls for SF6 breakers while the IFC Drawing EP-007 calls for
more robust compared to oil
Vacuum Circuit breakers
3- Specification 16341-9 section 2.8 states the below statement:
Target indicators shall be provided on all relays performing
protective or tripping functions. Relay contacts shall be self-
aligning
The statement is not clear and the designer is requested to
provide further clarification or rephrase the statement.

MA Response. Jan. 15, 2020

We note that all specifications issues till 19/3/2019 are in
possession of tenderers/contractor selected. Hence, so
long as the IFT and final IFC were same and Contractor
follow SCECO approved drawings no design deficiency or
miscoordination exist or existed and discrepancy of SF6
breaker in specifications versus vacuum in IFT/IFC drawings
should have been clarified for design intent during tender.
 The designer is requested to confirm type of Conduits acceptable
for the external network (Upvc or HDPE)
- Specifications 16138-3 / 2.02 / A page 1143 / 1647 states:
We Selected UPVC for LV Duct bank and HDPE for LC
2.02 NONMETALLIC DUCTS AND DUCT ACCESSORIES
3 Electrical External Network Clarification No Impact Closed Duct bank and lighting poles with 40% fitting ration in - Design discrepancy
A. Underground Plastic Utilities Duct: HDPE, with matching fittings
addition to spare conduits for future extension
by the same manufacturer as the duct, complying with relevant BS
standards and local Authorities requirements.
- IFC drawings No. EL 104 & EP-112 call for UPVC conduits.

MA Response. Jan. 15, 2020

Usually a discrepancy between specifications & drawings (for
material) is resolved by a RFI during tendering process. This should
have been clarified during tendering. Chlorine based products were
avoided per Ikea brief (including UPVC).

IFC drawing EL-104 external lighting calls for uPVC with diameter
100 for the conduits feeding pole lights & other lighting fixtures.
the size of the conduit mentioned here highlights itself as a non
4 Electrical External Network Clarification No Impact Closed HDPE selection as highlighted above - No Impact Design discrepancy
possibility to execute in the execution stage as the pole base cross
section is not enough to accommodate an incoming and outgoing
sleeve of the mentioned size. Please Advise

MA Response. Jan. 15, 2020

Conduit reducers can be used to pull the corresponding
cable to the light poles. This is perfectly doable. No design
deficiency here.

We Noticed a Variance Between the IFC & IFT E-EP 104 drawing
for Lightning protection as follows
Grounding &
IFT does not indicate a ground ring around the building &
5 Electrical Lightning Notification Time & Cost Closed Sub design submitted and VO issued to the contractor 614,250 Vo submitted Design discrepancy
additional ground rods were added
Protection
Capture heads height is 6 m in IFT & 4 m in IFC
Capture head quantity increased in IFC

MA Response. Jan. 15, 2020

Level 4 risk analysis study was MA’s design
intent up to IFT.
SAK, during AHJ submission, provided their comment dated
19/12/2018, requiring study for level 1 protection grade to be
executed..
Updated drawings sent on 20/12/2018 refer EP-104 (page 4 of
tracker). The AHJ requirements, once known, were incorporated
and provided for IFT set. As noted in Sl no.2 Contractor, while
tendering had all documentation issued till 19/3/2018. Hence no
deficiency or miscoordination.
No. Trade System Description Type Impact Status Response Cost Est. Status Reason

Specifications 16271section 202 point F & I in addition to 2.3, 2.4,

2.5 & 2.6 are apparently related to design criteria related to oil
type transformers. While the type of transformers used in the
6 Electrical MV Transformers Clarification No Impact Closed dry type transformer specifications adapted No Impact Design discrepancy
project is dry type. Moreover, section 2.7 calls for outdoor
transformers, while the transformers will be installed indoor.
Please advise.

MA Response. Jan. 15, 2020

Rev.01, issued on 20/12/2018 has the correct specifications of
Dry type transformers. Tenderers had all information up to
19/3/2019.

IFC central battery system schematic and BOQW call for a quantity
of 4 CBS modules each of 10 KVA while the load calculation results
Load calculations were verified, where the result
(done by the designer) indicates for two 10 KVA and two 15 KVA Design Validation &
7 Electrical CBS Issue Time & Cost Open indicates that 2 out of 4 modules must be upgraded from 148,025 VO submitted
modules Calculation
10 KVA to 15 KVA to maintain the designed backup time.
Load calculations are not done on the actual loads as per the IFC
drawings.
MA Response. Jan. 15, 2020
Typo Error. On CEBS schematic in lieu of 12.5 KVA, 10 KVA CEBS
was shown for 2 nos. However, Contractor looking at power SLD
drawings should have asked for clarification of discrepancy
during tender stage. Power SLD’s (Drawings EP-003 & EP-004)
call for 2 x 8 KW and 2 x 10 KW CEBS power rating.
Corresponding CEBS size in KVA was to be selected by
Contractor based upon his selected vendor. This requirement of
2 x 8 KW and 2 x 10 KW does not get changed but Contractor
may need to transfer 0.5KW from CEBS2 to CEBS3. No change to
equipment size therefore no variation due perceived
miscoordination.
the total connected load was revised and resulted in around 8.4
the Medium Voltage switchgear was purchased with 2
MVA without implementing the additional load caused by the
incomers where they system is now suitable for any type
variation orders, where one incomer will not serve the operation Design Validation &
8 Electrical MV Switchgear Issue No Impact Open of operation whether with one of two incomers (settings No Impact
in case SEC provided 2 incomers Calculation
during installation)
MA Response. Jan. 15, 2020 the only cost impact will be for the additional incomer.
We are not aware of variation orders issued adding additional
power load.
MA was aware that load > 8.4 MVA needed 2 incomers with
associated cost. Hence designer limited to < 8.4 MVA to limit
incomer to one. There is no requirement for 2 incomers in MA
design.
Where is the design deficiency?
 The busbars and bus-couplers in the LV Panelboards are not the Panels will be purchased as is; However, we will
Design Validation &
9 Electrical Panel Board capable of withstanding the total Load of 2 Panels (3000 KVA) in Notification No Impact Closed disconnect the bus coupler breakers and hand them to No Impact
Calculation
case of power interruption the operation team as spare parts.

MA Response. Jan. 15, 2020

Bus coupler was proposed only to be used in the event any one
transformer from the arrangement fails. In such scenario, the
connected load was to be restricted to the maximum power
capacity allowed on the 1500 kVA Transformer which shall be
attained through proper load shedding. Motorized breakers are
included in the design to facilitate same. At no point is all the
power for two transformer allowed to be transferred into a
single transformer. Therefore no question of any load > 2,500
amps (1500KVA) going thru the bus coupler. With the removal
of bus coupler the design intent to maintain certain loads,
despite failure of a transformer, is seriously compromised. All
the motorized breakers become redundant. By removing the
bus coupler and taking significant savings on replacement of
motorized breakers to non-motorized breakers, the violation of
design intent & loss of operational flexibility with the risk
identified, rests solely with Contractor. Client only getting a
spare “bus coupler” section does not make sense as the section,
itself, will become useless in present proposal. What specifically
is the design deficiency?

Cables feeding the Panels were changed to busbars instead of Better installation and efficiency and shorter installation
10 Electrical Panel Board Notification No Impact Closed No Impact Field Change
cables and cable trenches canceled time
MA Response. Jan. 15, 2020
Separate entry (from below) and exit from top of panels is to
us, a much cleaner installation. Savings from Civil for removal
of trenches? What specifically is the design deficiency here?
Honeywell shall conduct a coverage study and provide
Quantity of Heat detectors in the IFC is not sufficient, where the the latest requirements of the civil defense. Deviation in
Civil Defense
11 Electrical Fire Alarm civil defense consultant requested the distance between detectors Notification Time & Cost Open quantities shall be advised once the contractor submits under study
Requirements
to be 7 m while the distance is around 19 m in IFC. the coverage study.
Technical requirements are under study
SAK & MA Response. Jan. 15, 2020
Automatic Fire Detection by means of Heat Detectors is not
required in the car parking as this area is defined as ‘open car
parking structure’. This rule also applies to sprinkler systems and
the same has been conveyed to IKEA Team during design review
meetings. However, the team has agreed mutually to have the
sprinkler system as additional safety measures. Further, any area
that requires ‘heat detection’ can be exempted from such
requirement if the same area is provided with sprinkler system
(sprinklers can function like heat detectors when actuated by
triggering alarm through water flow switches). Hence, automatic
heat detection system can be omitted from car parking area,
keeping only manual call points to be used by occupants and visitor
to activate notification devices in case of fire emergencies.
 we will conduct the necessary calculations to determine
Risk that the Amplifiers might not withstand the power of the Design Validation &
12 Electrical PAVA Notification Time & Cost Open functionality of the system. Technical requirements are Under Study
speakers Calculation
under study
MA Response. Jan. 15, 2020
The amplifiers indicated are only for tendering purposes. The
actual size must be proposed and verified by a specialist AV
contractor, as required clearly in the specifications, extract
from 16728-2 below.

Contractor was requested to provide LS0H for indoor and

Armored POVC/PVC cable for indoor use which is against HSE
fire rated for emergency circuits
regulations and quality standards since Armored cables are very
1-LSOH for indoor.
hard to install on cable trays.
2-fire rated for emergency.
13 Electrical LV Cable MA Response. Jan. 15, 2020 Notification No Impact Open 3-Armored Cables for Trenches and duct banks No Impact Design Review
4-CU/XLPE/PVC for outdoor installation.
Cables specified were LSZH/Armoured not PVC. Armoured 5-CU/XLPE/PVC for all roof HVAC equipment and panels.
cables were proposed to be changed to PVC during review by 6-CU/XLPE/PVC for Parking level.
Nabil Abbas. However, based on IKEA’s confirmation armoured Armored cables will be used in trenches and duct banks.
cables were retained (refer attachment). Technically there are
no issues using armoured cables or any difficulties,
encountered, in pulling same within cable trays and all Ikea
installations in M.E. (approx. 8 at last count), done by MA, are in
past, similar Armoured cables running on cable trays. The
revised schedule of cable usage is a major deviance from design
intent and associated risk responsibility is for authorizer of the
change.
 We will study the system in details once the contractor
submits the drawings and Material submittals; However,
the system architecture has a very high maintenance
14 The system architecture indicates that the cabling used for camera since we need to start with UTP cables and a converter to Design Validation &
Electrical CCTV Notification Time & Cost Open under Study
is fiber cable switch to fiber at the end-user end then switch back to Calculation
MA Response. Jan. 15, 2020 UTP at the panel end.
The system architecture indicates the use of fiber cable only for instead we can switch the whole system to UTP cable and
cameras which are more than 90m away from the closest IDF. This use POE extenders for distances exceeding 90 m.
ensures compliance to the ANSI/TIA /EIA 568-B.1 which mandates
the maximum distance from telecommunication point to the
horizontal cross-connect shall not be more than 90m.

Many of the cameras that are being connected over fiber are the
higher resolution 3MP, 5MP or 360 degree camera.These cameras
have higher bandwidth and power (PoE+)requirements as
highlighted in the Security System specifications. Extract copied
from Section 13700-20 below.

The PoE extender if used must be able to provide the power and
bandwidth requirements for these cameras.

Any change of intent or violation of ANSI/TIA/EIA 568-B.1

carried risk, responsibility & liability for proposer. Please
advise specific design deficiency or miscoordination

Specifications call for fusible switches for loads less than 1200 A.
there is a risk that this type of switches will damage 3-phase we will instruct the contractor to limit the selection to
15 Electrical DSC Switches Notification No Impact Open - No Impact Design Review
machines such as HVAC equipment in case of the breakdown of unfishable switches in order to eliminate such a risk.
one of the fuses while the other fuses are running .
MA Response. Jan. 15, 2020
Please document source which identifies such “risk”.
The limitation of selection is at Contractor’s risk.

The specifications of Elevators 590D and 590E indicates for Rope

Driven type; However, The indication for Class C1 does not match The mentioned elevators were changes from Rope driven
16 Electrical Conveying Notification No Impact Closed - No Impact Design discrepancy
with any rope driven model, Hence rope driven will be normal to hydraulic at no cost
passenger Elevator instead of Freight Elevator
 Water supply will be totally interrupted during maintenance and
Maintenance
17 Mechanical Water Tank hence there will be no available supply for fire fighting or Notification No Impact Closed No Action - No Impact
Requirements
domestic use during maintenance of the water tank

MA Response. Jan. 15, 2020

Incorrect. 2 tanks provided. Only “unmaintainable” is the3rd

tank that shares water from either (when other under
maintenance). The large turnover is Tank 3, makes maintenance
not a requirement. We accept responsibility for the design and
do not accept the comment a “design deficiency” or
“miscoordination”.

High maintenance and low control on sluice valve due to it's type Maintenance
18 Mechanical Water Tank Notification No Impact Closed Internal sluice valve was replaced with external bypass - No Impact
and location especially that the valve needs Lubrication Requirements

MA Response. Jan. 15, 2020

Sluice valves are used in large water cisterns/reservoirs for

precisely “low maintenance“ reasons.

The contractor shall change the type of the grease

The location of grease interrupter at the door entrance might Difference
interrupter into automatic type and the grease
cause unpleasant odors to the customers between the
interrupter was relocated to a more suitable location
19 Mechanical Sanitary The BOQ description call for an automatic type of grease Notification Time & Cost Open 194,265 main design and Design discrepancy
cost as per Variation order NO : YMCO/PRO/2019/359
interrupter wile the part number listed in specifications is manual; the new
cost = 194265 SAR
Moreover, the contractor submitted a manual type for approval requirement
delivery time : 4 month
MA Response. Jan. 15, 2020
Copy of the Part number specified is attached, alongwith the
electrical & water & drainage drawings (extracted). An
“automatic” type has a pump to automatically transfer collected
grease to surface vehicle after auto annunciating fill level alarm,
and then after grease removal auto rinsing/cleaning the grease
holding tank before putting the system to use, Specifications &
drawings show all requirements/provisions so interpretation of
same as “manual” is not understood. Location is irrelevant as
these type of interceptors are fully sealed and do not emit any
odors and are the only ones we use within commercial kitchens
locating the unit internally within conditioned space. There is no
“new” requirement arising from a “design deficiency” or
“miscoordination” as per attached IFT/IFC drawing extract.
 The Pump room shall be equipped with the necessary air-
RO & Treatment plant shall operate at a temperature of 24 conditioning & a variation order will be submitted by the
Vendor
20 Mechanical HVAC Degrees as per their vendor recommendation; However the pump Issue Time & Cost Open contractor Under Study
Recommendation
room is not equipped with any means of Air conditioning package unit 25ton with duct and grill
MA Response. Jan. 15, 2020 delivery time = 4 month
Perhaps the Contractor or his vendor has not come across
portable packaged & container/pallet RO units which work in non-
conditioned environment. The membranes are, of course,
sensitive to high water temperatures. However, the panel, is no
different from the panels for all the other pumps (fire, booster)
etc. contained within the same room and should meet capability
of specified operational ambient temperatures & humidity limits.
Limiting feed water temperature to 24oC, if really a must, then it is
not a design deficiency but incorrect vendor selection.

The Contractor will be instructed to achieve the civil

The Pump Room is not equipped with any means of fire fighting as defense requirements and a variation order shall be
Civil Defense
21 Mechanical Fire Fighting per the IFC drawings; However, the Civil defense requirements Issue Time & Cost Open submitted Under Study
Requirements
calls for a mist system to be installed installation of water mist system
delivery time = 4 month
SAK & MA Response. Jan. 15, 2020
The pump room is protected by wet type sprinkler system (refer to
DWG # FF-104_Service Block - Fire Fighting Layout). There is no
code that mandates Water Mist Systems for fire pump rooms.
According to NFPA-20, fire pump rooms with diesel engine& fuel
tanks shall be protected by wet type sprinkler system with Extra
Hazard Group-I Classification, as used by us in design. Design
discrepancy cannot be due another designers engineering
discretion to protect pump rooms with for more expensive mist or
other alternate system. The Code & AHJ requirements are fully
satisfied with the sprinkler design. Where specifically, is the design
deficiency?
 Xenex shall provide a probation for fire fighting and the
contractor shall provide the fire fighting water supply to under Study
Refrigeration rooms and cold rooms shall be equipped with
those rooms; Moreover, a variation order will be based on the Civil Defense
22 Mechanical Fire Fighting sprinkler system fire fighting as per Civil defense requirements; Issue Time & Cost Open
submitted. Civil defense Requirements
However, the IFC doesn't indicate for any means of fire fighting
installation of deluge valve for each cold room consultant
delivery time = 3 month
MA Response. Jan. 15, 2020

Dry pendant sprinklers provided. Refer drawing FF 102 issued

20/11/2018, extract attached. Please advise design deficiency
or miscoordination.

The contractor shall update the drawings to achieve Civil

defense requirements and a variation order will be
under Study
issued.
Smoke The quantity of Smoke ventilation fans in the IFC drawings does based on the Civil Defense
23 Mechanical Issue Time & Cost Open the smoke management system under progress with
Ventilation not achieve the requirements of Civil Defense. Civil defense Requirements
wasel consultant , the cost will be provided after finish
MA Response. Jan. 15, 2020 consultant
the design and civil defense requirements
There is no Civil Defense requirement for Smoke ventilation on delivery time of smoke fans = 5 month
this project. The fans provided are for clearing out smoke
AFTER a fire to permit cleaning crew to enter & fans were
provided as part of GBF “additional” requirement to local AHJ
requirements. If this is termed a design deficiency, the fans may
be removed entirety with residual risk for previously post fire
facility clearance provided, that of the Contractor.

The design indicates for post tension system which is not Post Tension system was changed to Precast Design Validation &
24 Civil Structural Issue Cost Closed 2,000,000 VO Approved
structurally safe Variation order was submitted : 2000000 sar Calculation
SAK Response, Jan. 15, 2020
The PT system is safe. Please refer to “IKEA Thumamah PT Design
Review Meeting Minutes” dated April 10, 2019. The Contractor
should have given a negative variation of SR 4 Million (instead of SR
2 Million positive variation) for accepting his proposal for Precast
Design.
Reinforcement was increased and the contractor was
The steel reinforcement of the retaining wall is not safe from the Design Validation &
25 Civil Structural Issue Cost Open instructed to add a tie beam. 148,000 VO submitted
backfilling side. Calculation
Variation order was submitted : 148000 SAR
SAK Response, Jan. 15, 2020
The retaining wall design is provided and reviewed by the design
review consultant and without any comment. Who instructed the
contractor to add a tie beam shall be responsible for additional
cost

Isolated footing were replaced with combined footings

Isolated footing is not suitable in some locations due to the
this is due to changing the stairs from cast in-situ to Vendor
26 Civil Structural changes prom Post tension to Precast and the changes of Issue No Impact Open - No Impact
precast which is already included in Precast variation Recommendation
Elevators 590 D & 590 E from rope driven into hydraulic
order
SAK Response, Jan. 15, 2020
Residual risk for changing the PT to Precast Design for which the
Contractor is responsible.
 A valve room will be constructed without any changes on
Valve room required for the external bypass that replaced the Raft foundation. And a variation order will be submitted
Maintenance
27 Civil Structural sluice valve Notification Time & Cost Open 3 weeks time impact to cast the wall and roof of valve Under Study
Requirements
MA Response, Jan. 15, 2020 room. Whoever the critical path is not affected by this
The sluice valve replacement is a Contractor decision, not supported item
by Designers hence all consequences are for Contractor.

change all double column at expansion joint to big

columns
Field changes on Columns due to site requirements, AL-Rashid Vendor
28 Civil Structural Notification No Impact Closed Add one as per recommendation from al Rashed No Impact
Recommendation, and Thyssenkrupp recommendation Recommendation
Modified two columns support for travellator to one
SAK Response, Jan. 15, 2020
Residual risk for changing the PT to Precast Design for which the column as per recommendation from ThyssenKrupp
Contractor is responsible.

Grade beams will be added between the Columns around

The Columns around water tank are of a significant height without Design Validation &
29 Civil Structural Notification Time & Cost Open the water tank Under Study
any interlinks in between them Calculation
already done but it took 2 weeks to be done
SAK Response, Jan. 15, 2020
All column around water tank are either inside the wall of tanks or
tied by grade beam; please refer to Dwg. (S200). No additional grade
beams are required.

1 shear wall was added to resist wind and seismic load

caused by changing the dimension of the corbels
Field changes to shear wall where shear walls will be constructed requested by the designer. Design Validation &
30 Civil Structural Notification No Impact Open Under Study
in two locations as per AL-Rashid Recommendation 1 additional shear wall and 1 column were added to Calculation
SAK Response, Jan. 15, 2020 support the elevators' pit starting from the main level to
Residual risk for changing the PT to Precast Design for which the the upper level
Contractor is responsible.

the one's increased for precast columns has no cost and

no time.
Field changes on the Pedestal Dimensions due to Vendor Design Validation &
31 Civil Structural Notification Time & Cost Open While the pedestals increased for the canopy and steel Under Study
Recommendations, updated calculations, and design review Calculation
stair have cost impact because the pedestals were
SAK Response, Jan. 15, 2020
Please provide us with the columns which need to be increased with increased from 30x30 to 40x40 due to design issues
supported documents.

In order to maintain distance between center of column

Design Validation &
32 Civil Architectural Changing the girt type to be by-pass instead of flush Notification Time & Cost open to out of steel panel = 550mm as per the architectural Under Study
Calculation
Additional information needed to provide a reply. design

All hydraulic elevators required a pump and panel room with air- 6 rooms to be added, 2 underground and 4 in parking Design Validation &
33 Civil Architectural Notification Time & Cost Under Study
conditioning open level Calculation
Additional information needed to provide a reply.
 Changing the fasteners spacing to be 1000mm instead of 250mm In order to use a 1m fastener, Girts have to be increased Design Validation &
34 Civil Architectural Notification Time & Cost Under Study
and consequently thickness of all girts are increased. in thickness to achieve that Calculation
Open
Additional information needed to provide a reply.

the Design refers to using a C-channel only to be the

Adding steel soldier columns. Because the girt span became
support of sandwich panels of the elevations and that is Design Validation &
35 Civil Structural more than 8 Ms so the girt section was failed and thus the Notification Time & Cost 600,000 Under Study
not enough structurally So, We have to add an additional Calculation
additional soldier column became a must
Open soldier columns.
GF-ST Response, Jan. 23, 2020
The girt system is designed for the spans shown on the drawings and
are in full compliance with the design codes listed in the CD
submittal. In general, the sag rods specified will provide intermediate
vertical support for the C-Channel; therefore, additional support
column(as proposed) are not required.

Due to the Loads of Sandwich panels of the elevations

All the girt spacing will be changing to 1.1 & 1.3m and this will
and the requirements of the Sandwich panels Approved Design Validation &
36 Civil Structural increase the girts qty Notification Cost Under Study
supplier ( Trimo ), Spacing has to be reduced and that Calculation
GF-ST Response, Jan. 23, 2020
The wall system is designed to comply with the wall panel Open caused the increasing of girts
manufacturer’s span rating requirements as well as the design codes
list in the CD submittal. The girt system, as designed, is structurally
adequate to support the wall panels for vertical and horizontal loads.

checking the thermal impact on the screed slabs leads to

Additional Expansion Joints @ GL 7 and @ GL G to control the
37 Civil Structural Notification Cost the necessity of adding new Joints @ GL (7) and @ GL Under Study Design discrepancy
thermal impact on the main and upper floor screed slab.
Open (G).
SAK Response, Jan. 15, 2020
Residual risk for changing the PT to Precast Design for which the
Contractor is responsible.
As per our DDR (Rev.03) dated 11/7/2019. YAMCO& Alrashid to
address the temperature effect considering the diaphragm as semi-
rigid and submit to the engineer for approval.