Attachment to No.

13
Mario Associates Eng. Consultancy

From: Mario Associates <mail@mario.ae>

Sent: 10 January 2019 12:47
To: 'John Bemben'
Cc: 'Rod New'; 'Omar Mansour'; 'Vicky Malkani'; 'Antoine Marie'; 'shabeena@mario.ae'
Subject: RE: Peer Review Report (Eng. Rod)
Attachments: Peer Review Comments Tracker-ELECTRICAL.xlsx; Peer Review Comments Tracker-
PLUMBING.xlsx; Peer Review Comments Tracker-MECHANICAL.xlsx

Importance: High

Dear Sir,

Please find attached excel files of Peer Review Comments as per below request.

The Electrical review comments only has change but all are attached for your perusal.

Regards,

Derick

From: John Bemben [mailto:jbemben@greenbergfarrow.com]

Sent: Wednesday, January 9, 2019 7:36 PM
To: shabeena@mario.ae
Cc: Rod New <rnew@greenbergfarrow.com>; Omar Mansour <omansour@greenbergfarrow.com>; 'Vicky Malkani'
<vicky@mario.ae>; Antoine Marie <amarie@greenbergfarrow.com>
Subject: RE: Peer Review Report (Eng. Rod)

Shabeena,

Are the three Peer Review Comment files different than what you sent previously?

If so, can you please send them to me as Excel files?

John Bemben AIA, NCARB, LEED AP

Senior Associate
3 Executive Drive, Suite 150, Somerset, NJ 08873
c: 732.801.5267

Confidentiality Notice: This email may contain confidential and/or private information. If you received this email in error please delete and notify sender.

From: shabeena@mario.ae <shabeena@mario.ae>

Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2019 9:08 AM
To: John Bemben <jbemben@greenbergfarrow.com>
Cc: Rod New <rnew@greenbergfarrow.com>; Omar Mansour <omansour@greenbergfarrow.com>; 'Vicky Malkani'

1
<vicky@mario.ae>; Antoine Marie <amarie@greenbergfarrow.com>
Subject: RE: Peer Review Report (Eng. Rod)

Dear John

Please find below link to the drawings incorporating the following IKEA comments
 Security comments email dated 20/11/2018
 IT comments email dated 20/12/2018
 IKEA additional lighting requirements for Self-serve area as per email dated 31/12/2018
 Updated Peer review electrical tracker with “OPEN” Items CLOSED

Below link also includes the responses against each comment for IKEA’s review and the updated peer review tracker.

REV.02 Drawings & Specification with MA response to IKEA Comments - https://we.tl/t-XWfmLhsRRL

In addition to above, per Antoine’s mail dated 03/01/2019 and your mail dated 21/12/2018 , please find below link
to the following specifications and drawings that were not issued as part of the Rev 01 issuance.
 EP-113 REV 01
 FP-107 REV 01
 SEC-100 REV 01
 Security Systems
 Dry Type Distribution Transformers
 Medium Voltage Switchgear
 I.T. Cabinets
 Fire Alarm System
 PAVA

REV.01 Drawings & Specifications- - https://we.tl/t-4b80vVdoFn

Best Regards,

Shabeena M R
Manager Projects, Partner
B.Tech., LEED AP

From: John Bemben [mailto:jbemben@greenbergfarrow.com]

Sent: 07 January 2019 04:14 PM
To: salah sak-consult <salah.m@sak-consult.com>
Cc: Rod New <rnew@greenbergfarrow.com>; Omar Mansour <omansour@greenbergfarrow.com>; hussain sak-
consult <a.hussain@sak-consult.com>; Vicky Malkani (vicky@mario.ae) <vicky@mario.ae>; Shabeena
<shabeena@mario.ae>; Antoine Marie <amarie@greenbergfarrow.com>
Subject: RE: Peer Review Report (Eng. Rod)

Salah,

Pending Rod’s review of your responses, you will need to cloud and tag all changes as Revision 2.

Vicky/Shabeena,

2
 Attachment to No. 13
NABIL ELECTRICAL COMMENTS DATED 08/12/2018

DOCUMENT TITLE STATUS NO. COMMENTS / NOTES MA COMMENTS dated 13 DEC 2018 PEER REVIEW SKYPE MEETING RESPONSE dated 13 DEC 2018 UPDATED DRAWING REF STATUS GF STATUS
EL-100 PARKING LEVEL LIGHTING LAYOUT NOTE: Lighting fixtures type, models and illumination level shall be as per the Client and operation requirements. Lux Level Calculation provided as part of MEP calculations. Transmitted separately. No Action from MA
A
Lux calculations shall be provided.
EL-101 MAIN LEVEL LIGHTING LAYOUT A
CLOSED
EL-102 UPER LEVEL LIGHTING LAYOUT A
EL-103 ROOF LEVEL LIGHTING LAYOUT A
EL-104 SITE PLAN EXTERNAL LIGHTING LAYOUT A
No action from MA CLOSED
EP-000 Electric General Notes and Legend A
EP-001 ELECTRICAL SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM SHEET – 1 C 1 MV, LV and frequency information should be mentioned on each drawing. Noted. Shall be provided. Noted. Shall be provided. EP-001, EP -002 and EP-007 Revision 2 CLOSED
EP-002 ELECTRICAL SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM SHEET – 2 Cables length and voltage drop should be mentioned for each cable on the single line diagrams. Voltage drop Refer voltage drop calculations (part of MEP calculations) for cable lengths and voltage drops. MA shall provide cable schedule detailing the feed from, feed to, cable type and capacity, type of installation , LS-013
C 2 CLOSED
calculation notes should be provided. voltage drop, cable length
EP-003 ELECTRICAL SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM SHEET – 3 Please clarify if this is an authority regulations, currently the trip rating of the main breakers is sized per the Total NAA confirmed that the breaker sizes are to be two times for the LV panel 3 as per authority regulations EP-001 - 007 Revision-02
The trip rating of the main breaker of panel board should be minimum two times larger than any branch breaker in connected load on the panel. If we need, to follow then main breaker size will increase approx. 30%
C 3 CLOSED
the panel. To be modified accordingly in (LV panel-3, smdb-ex, esmdb-ex, smdb-ext, smdb-wh, esmdb-sh1, esmdb-
mh1, smdb-ul-ups, etc… to be checked and modified where applicable in other panels and load schedules.
EP-004 ELECTRICAL SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM SHEET – 4 Power factor should be mentioned on the drawings. Power factor correction capacitor and reactive power Targeted Power factor (0.95) shall be mentioned in the drawings. PF calculations provided as part of MEP Calculations have been provided EP-001, EP -002 Revision 02
C 4 CLOSED
calculations are required, should be provided. calculations.
EP-005 ELECTRICAL SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM SHEET – 5 Cables sizing calculation notes should be provided as a schedule and should include cable tag, feed from, type of Cable schedule shall be added as additional drawings. MA shall provide cable schedule detailing the feed from, feed to, cable type and capacity, type of installation , LS-013
C 5 installation, cable current rating, derating factor, demand load, cable length, calculated voltage drop and cable voltage drop, cable length CLOSED
protection device rating.
EP-006 ELECTRICAL SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM SHEET – 6 C 6 Short circuits (lsc) calculations are required, should be provided. Refer MEP calculations for Isc rating calculations. Transmitted separately. NO action from MA
Rating of MCCB for PFCC-3 shall be corrected. MA to incorporate in to design EP-001 Revision-1
7 CLOSED
In LV PANEL-3, to correct the rating of the MCCB for the PFCC. Similar mistakes to be checked and corrected.
In SMDB-K3, to correct the rating of the disconnect switch of K-005-1 and K-005-2. Similar mistakes to be checked Isolator rating od K005-1 and K-005-2 shall be corrected. MA to incorporate in to design EP-006 Revision-1
8 CLOSED
and corrected.
We noticed that all used cables are (SWA) steel wire armoured!? To be verified. In order to achieve the optimal This could be considered as a VE. Your point noted. IKEA requeried the cables to be retained as SWA, and the change shall be looked in to during VE. No further action
9 cable service, armoured cables are not recommended for tray applications, as they are heavy weight and extra loads from MA CLOSED
are exerted on the tray.
In SMDB-PUMP, to correct the size of branch cables serving WTP-1 and WTP-2. All similar mistakes are to be Shall review MA shall incorporate EP-003 Revision-1
10 CLOSED
corrected.
All power Loads are considered valid and correct as per selected equipments, appliances, devices and fixtures data Matched. No action from MA
11 CLOSED
sheets.
EP-007 POWER HV SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM A
EP-100 PARKING LEVEL POWER LAYOUT No action from MA
A
NOTE: Quantity, layout and level of power outlets are considered valid, correct and as as per the client and
EP-101 MAIN LEVEL POWER LAYOUT A No action from MA
operation requirements.
EP-102 UPER LEVEL POWER LAYOUT A
EP-103 ROOF LEVEL POWER LAYOUT A
EP-104 ROOF PLAN LIGHTNING PROTECTION LAYOUT As per SAK comment system concept revised from active to passive & revised drawings & calculations issued. MA shall provide updated lightning protection design EP-104 Revision-1
CLOSED
Detailed earthing and lightning protection plans should be provided.

EP-105 SERVICE BLOCK POWER LAYOUT

A

EP-106 CONTROL ROOMS POWER LAYOUT A

EP-107 SEC ROOM POWER LAYOUT A
NOTE: Quantity, layout and level of power outlets are considered valid, correct and as as per the client and
EP-108 RECEIVING AREA & EXIT CAFÉ POWER LAYOUT A No action from MA No action from MA CLOSED
operation requirements.
EP-109 MAIN KITCHEN POWER LAYOUT A
EP-110 ELECTRICAL ROOM DETAILS POWER LAYOUT A
EP-111 LIGHTNING PROTECTION DETAILS A
EP-112 SITE PLAN EXTERNAL POWER LAYOUT A

IT-100 PARKING LEVEL IT NETWORK SYSTEM LAYOUT

A

IT-101 MAIN LEVEL IT NETWORK SYSTEM LAYOUT A

NOTE: Quantity, layout and level of IT outlets are considered valid, correct and as as per the Client and operation
IT-102 UPER LEVEL IT NETWORK SYSTEM LAYOUT A No action from MA CLOSED
requirements.
IT-103 ROOF LEVEL IT NETWORK SYSTEM LAYOUT A
IT-104 IT SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM A
IT-105 IT ROOMS IT NETWORK SYSTEM LAYOUT A

LS-001 SUMMARY & LV PANEL-1 LOAD SCHEDULE Feeder cable information should be mentioned on each panel load schedule and shall include cable type, size, Refer Voltage Drop calculations part of MEP calculations. Transmitted separately. No action from MA
C 1 CLOSED
length and calculated voltage drop.
LS-002 LV PANEL-2 LOAD SCHEDULE SHEET (1 OF 2) Please clarify if this is an authority regulations, currently the trip rating of the main breakers is sized per the Total NAA confirmed that the breaker sizes are to be two times for the LV panel 3 as per authority regulations LS-001 Revision-1
The trip rating of the main breaker of panel board should be minimum two times larger than any branch breaker in connected load on the panel. If we need, to follow then main breaker size will increase approx. 30%
C 2 CLOSED
the panel. Schedules to be checked and to be modified accordingly. Ex: in EDB-MH-P, DB-ML-UPS-SEC, DB-UL-
UPSSEC- 1, ESMDB-SH1, ESMDB-MH1, EDM-MHL1, EDB-SH-L1, EDB-SH-L2, EDB-MH-L2, etc…
LS-003 LV PANEL-2 LOAD SCHEDULE SHEET (2 OF 2) In some panels schedules, the result of maximum demand load shown in the MD column is different than the result The mismatch is in tenth of a KW range, is insignificant & due rounding and should not an issue with AHJ or MA to update Load schedule LS-001 TO LS-012 Revision-1
C 3 CLOSED
for max. demand-3phase. Ex: SMDB-UL-UPS-IT (S), SMDB-UL-UPS-IT (D), etc… Contractor.
LS-004 LV PANEL-3 LOAD SCHEDULE SHEET (1 OF 2) The mismatch is in tenth of a KW range, is insignificant & due rounding and should not an issue with AHJ or MA to update Load schedule LS-001 TO LS-012 Revision-1
To coordinate between the demand factor DF of the branches in the Main panel schedule and the demand factor Contractor.
C 4 CLOSED
DF in the panel schedules of the branches. For example, the DF for the branches in (LV panel-4) is 0.85 and the DF in
the panel schedules of the branches is 0.9. All similar mistakes to be corrected accordingly.
LS-005 LV PANEL-3 LOAD SCHEDULE SHEET (2 OF 2) The breakers trip rating for AC equipments and other equipments shall be as per the MOCP maximum overcurrent The breaker trip rating has been selected as per MOCP and type of starting method. We are using EC motors in No action from MA
C 5 CLOSED
protection requirement of each equipment. majority of Mechanical driven equipment on this project.
LS-006 LV PANEL-4 LOAD SCHEDULE SHEET (1 OF 4) C
LS-007 LV PANEL-4 LOAD SCHEDULE SHEET (2 OF 4) C
LS-008 LV PANEL-4 LOAD SCHEDULE SHEET (3 OF 4) C
LS-009 LV PANEL-4 LOAD SCHEDULE SHEET (4 OF 4) C
LS-010 LV PANEL-5 LOAD SCHEDULE SHEET (1 OF 2) C
LS-011 LV PANEL-5 LOAD SCHEDULE SHEET (2 OF 2) C
LS-012 LV PANEL-6 LOAD SCHEDULE C

PAVA-100 PARKING LEVEL PAVA SYSTEM LAYOUT A

PAVA-101 MAIN LEVEL PAVA SYSTEM LAYOUT A
NOTE: Type, model, Quantity, layout and location are
PAVA-102 UPER LEVEL PAVA SYSTEM LAYOUT A
considered valid, correct and as as per the Client and No action from MA No action from MA CLOSED
PAVA-103 ROOF PLAN PAVA SYSTEM LAYOUT A
operation requirements.
PAVA-104 PAVA SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM A
PAVA-105 PAVA SYSTEM INSTALLTION DETAILS A

SEC-100 PARKING LEVEL CCTV SYSTEM LAYOUT A

NOTE: Type, model, Quantity, layout and location are
SEC-101 MAIN LEVEL CCTV SYSTEM LAYOUT A
considered valid, correct and as as per the Client and No action from MA No action from MA CLOSED
SEC-102 UPER LEVEL CCTV SYSTEM LAYOUT A
operation requirements.
SEC-103 ROOF PLAN CCTV SYSTEM LAYOUT A
SEC-104 SITE PLAN EXTERNAL CCTV SYSTEM LAYOUT A
SEC-105 CCTV SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM A