Opening Speech:

Economic inequality in free trade agreements.

Good morning have a good greeting form Canada, President, Vicepresident, and
delgates.

The free trade agreements are agreements in which two or more nations agree
between them parameters for international trading about different products that
each nation provide, having more benefits between, them for example in the prices
from the products. What really happen is that the nations have double intentions
with those FTA like for example start to invade a nation, like what is happening in
Colombia with the Chinnese. So in the world are we living between hypocrites?

The nation of Canada belief that in a free trade agreement all the nations involve in
it must have benefits because if not it would not be fair that the developed nations
take advanage form the nations that are more undeveloped. What a free trade
agreement must help is to think in a future the nation development and prosperity.

What the nation propose is the intervention of a neutral nation in the agreement
that is not part from that treaty so it would have a validity, also see the necesities
from the nations involve in the treaty so they can be supply with the proposals from
the agreement.

Position Paper:

Good morning have a good greeting form Canada, President, Vicepresident, and
delgates.

All around the world many super powers and undeveloped nations had make Free
Trade Agreements between them for increasing the trading between the nations,
aslo it help for the relationships between them. That bring a huge amount of
benefits like nation development and prosperity in the market, also have foreign
products from a varie of nations (variety), or have good prices in the products that
are sell.
Sometimes what is no too fair is that always are going to be nations that are going
to be more benefit form the FTA becuase of the way the proposals are made, for
example if a developed nation is going to make an agreemnt with a undeveloped
nation, the developed one is going to give supplies to the undeveloped and would
make deals that can not reject becasue need from that nation to trascend. But not
all in the life is free, in a future what the developed nation had gived to the
undeveloped one it must pay by a way in which it needs to be more significally
because the developed nation had helped the other one to prosper. This shows
how bussines are done, but in a way isnt to equitative morally becuase always one
nation is going to take more advantage from the deals or traties than the others,
but that is the prize it must be payed.

Knowing that the FTA involve nations that got open their markets for provide help
between them. But if the present delegations think that are inequalities lets start to
say solutions for erradicate this problem, but we need to be coherent if a treaty had
been signed is becuase both sides are in favor, as many delegations had said. So
the nation propose that when developing the FTA it need to be thinking into the
necesities that both nations have, so the agreement focused on them.