Professional Documents
Culture Documents
negligible contribution. The high lattice thermal conductivity is due to large group velocities, small
Grüneisen parameters, and long phonon lifetimes. The size effects on lattice thermal conductivity
are considered by cumulative thermal conductivity with respect to phonon mean free path(MFP).
To significantly reduce the lattice thermal conductivity, the characteristic length smaller than 100
nm is required, and can reach a decrease of 36%. These results may be useful to understand thermal
transport processes that occur inside giant planets.
I. INTRODUCTION
35 35 600
30 30 500
Frequency (THz)
400
(W/mK)
Na
25 25
He
20 20 300
L
15 15 200
10 10
100
5 5
0
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
0 0
T
W L X W 0.0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.8
160 18
(W/mK)
140 16
FIG. 2. Phonon band structures and partial DOS of Na2 He. 120 14
12
L
100
10
Accumulated
80
sis set is used with kinetic energy cutoff of 1000 eV. The 8
60
second order harmonic and third order anharmonic inter- 6
40 4
atomic force constants (IFC) are calculated by using a 3
20 2
× 3 × 3 supercell and a 2 × 2 × 2 supercell, respectively.
0 0
Using the harmonic IFCs, the group velocity and specific 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
heat can be attained by phonon dispersion relation, and Frequency (THz)
× 20 × 20 meshes.
20
10 5.4% 4.5% 6.1%
III. MAIN CALCULATED RESULTS AND 0.02% 0.02% 0.08%
ANALYSIS 0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
N
The Na2 He has a fluorite-type structure with space
group F m3̄m at 300 GPa1 . The Na and He atoms occupy FIG. 3. (Color online) Top: the lattice thermal conductivity
the Wyckoff position 8c (0.25,0.25,0.25) and 4a (0,0,0), of Na2 He as a function of temperature; Middle: the accumu-
respectively. The schematic crystal structure is shown in lated lattice thermal conductivity (300 K), and the deriva-
tives; Bottom: phonon modes contributions toward total lat-
Figure 1. The experimental lattice parameter a=3.95 Å
tice thermal conductivity (300 K).
is employed to investigate it’s phonon transport. Based
on harmonic IFCs, the phonon dispersions are calculated
along high-symmetry pathes, which is shown in Figure 2,
together with partial density of states (DOS). The unit the derivatives, and phonon modes contributions to-
cell of Na2 He contains three atoms, resulting in 3 acous- ward total lattice thermal conductivity (300 K). The
tic and 6 optical phonon branches in the phonon spectra. room-temperature lattice thermal conductivity is 149.19
According to Figure 2, a gap of 6.09 THz can be observed, Wm−1 K−1 , and the lattice thermal conductivity nearly
which separates three high-frequency optical modes from meets the 1/T relation at high temperature (above room-
the low-frequency modes. The high-frequency optical temperature). As shown in Figure 3(Middle), the acous-
modes are mainly from He vibrations, while the acoustic tic phonon branches below the 13.34 THz dominate lat-
and low-frequency optical modes of phonon dispersions tice thermal conductivity, and the peak of the derivatives
mainly is due to the vibrations of the Na atoms. The drops rapidly at 13.34 THz. The remaining contribution
low-frequency optical modes have larger dispersion than is almost from low-frequency optical modes, while the
high-frequency ones, indicating that low-frequency ones high-frequency optical modes show a neglectful contribu-
have relatively large group velocities. tion to lattice thermal conductivity, also found in other
Figure 3 shows the lattice thermal conductivity of semiconductors12 . Further, the relative contributions of
Na2 He as a function of temperature, the accumu- every acoustic and optical phonon mode to the total lat-
lated lattice thermal conductivity (300 K) along with tice thermal conductivity are examined. The two trans-
3
0.24
14 1
1
0.21
12
group velocity (km/s)
2
2
0.18 3
3
Lifetime (ns)
10 4
4
0.15 5
5
8 6 0.12
6
7
7
6 8 0.09 8
9
4 9
0.06
2 0.03
0 0.00
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33
1.8
1.2
(W/mK)
140
0.30
to around 90% of the lattice thermal conductivity for
120
0.24
PbTe7 . Phonons with MFP smaller than 100 nm com-
prise around 64% of the lattice thermal conductivity for
L
100
80
60
half of the total thermal conductivity for Si6 .
0.12
In summary, the intrinsic lattice thermal conductiv-
40
0.06 ity of Na2 He is calculated based mainly on the reliable
20
first-principle calculations and Boltzmann transport the-
0
0 100 200 300 400
0.00
ory. The room-temperature lattice thermal conductiv-
phonon MFP (nm)
ity is found to be 149.19 Wm−1 K−1 . The acoustic and
low-frequency optical branches provide nearly 100% con-
FIG. 6. (Color online) Cumulative lattice thermal conductiv- tribution to total lattice thermal conductivity. The high
ity of Na2 He with respect to phonon mean free path at room lattice thermal conductivity is due to weak anharmonic-
temperature. ity and high group velocities. In addition, the size effects
on thermal conductivity are also studied by cumulative
lattice thermal conductivity with respect to MFP. The
present work can encourage further efforts to investigate
ones of Na2 He. So, the lattice thermal conductivity (1.9 other chemical and physical properties of Na2 He.
Wm−1 K−1 ) of PbTe at 300 K is very lower than one of
Na2 He. The similarity between Na2 He and PbTe is that
the contributions of optical phonons to lattice thermal ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
conductivity remain very large, 16% for Na2 He and 22%
for PbTe at room temperature. However, for Si, the op- This work is supported by the National Natural Sci-
tical branches comprise only 5% of the lattice thermal ence Foundation of China (Grant No. 11404391). We
conductivity21–23 . The difference among them is size ef- are grateful to the Advanced Analysis and Computation
fects on lattice thermal conductivity, which can be de- Center of CUMT for the award of CPU hours to accom-
scribed by cumulative lattice thermal conductivity as a plish this work.
1
D. Xiao et al., Nat. Chem. (2017). B 87, 165201 (2013).
13
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nchem.2716 A. J. Minnich, J. A. Johnson, A. J. Schmidt, K. Esfarjani,
2
L. Chaput, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 265506 (2013). M. S. Dresselhaus, K. A. Nelson and G. Chen, Phys. Rev.
3
A. Ward, D. A. Broido, D. A. Stewart and G. Deinzer, Lett. 107, 095901 (2011).
14
Phys. Rev. B 80, 125203 (2009). P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, Phys. Rev. 136, B864 (1964);
4
A. Ward and D. A. Broido, Phys. Rev. B 81, 085205 W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, Phys. Rev. 140, A1133 (1965).
15
(2010). G. Kresse, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 193, 222 (1995).
5 16
A. Togo, L. Chaput and I. Tanaka, Phys. Rev. B 91, G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15
094306 (2015). (1996).
6 17
K. Esfarjani,G. Chen and H. T. Stokes, Phys. Rev. B 84, G. Kresse and D. Joubert, Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758 (1999).
18
085204 (2011). J. P. Perdew, K. Burke and M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett.
7
Z. Tian, J. Garg, K. Esfarjani, T. Shiga, J. Shiomi and G. 77, 3865 (1996).
19
Chen, Phys. Rev. B 85, 184303 (2012). H. Z. Shao, X. J. Tan, G. Q. Liu, J. Jiang and H. C. Jiang,
8
T. Shiga, J. Shiomi, J. Ma, O. Delaire, T. Radzynski, A. Sci. Rep. 6, 21035 (2016).
20
Lusakowski,K. Esfarjani and G. Chen,Phys. Rev. B 85, Y. Zhang, X. Z. Ke, C. F. Chen, J. Yang and P. R. C.
155203 (2012). Kent, Phys. Rev. B 80, 024304 (2009).
9 21
W. Li, J. Carrete, N. A Katcho and N. Mingo, Comput. A. S. Henry and G. Chen, J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci. 5,
Phys. Commun. 185, 1747 (2014). 141 (2008).
10 22
L. Lindsay, D. A. Broido and T. L. Reinecke, Phys. Rev. D. A. Broido, M. Malorny, G. Birner, N.Mingo, and D. A.
Lett. 109, 095901 (2012). Stewart, Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 231922 (2007).
11 23
L. Lindsay, D. A. Broido and T. L. Reinecke, Phys. Rev. D. P. Sellan, J. E. Turney, A. J. H. McGaughey, and C. H.
Lett. 111, 025901 (2013). Amon, J Appl. Phys. 108, 113524 (2010).
12
L. Lindsay, D. A. Broido and T. L. Reinecke, Phys. Rev.