Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Objectives
This exercise assesses the following two course intended learning outcomes:
• (#2) Apply the critical thinking skills to examine arguments in debates and texts;
• (#4) Formulate positions over controversial social issues, and evaluate those positions
through reflective thinking.
General Instructions
Passage:
“Smoking should be banned. Cigarette is like a dangerous drug - the more we consume, the more
we are addicted to it. Moreover, like dangerous drugs, cigarettes make us feel better in the short
run but harm us in the long run. Furthermore, smoking creates second-hand smoke which has
negative health impacts on non-smokers. It is important that people are free to do what they want.
But it is more important that people should not cause harms to themselves or to others. Therefore,
smoking harm us as individuals and harm society. So it should be illegal.”
Part 2: Informal Fallacies (Lecture 9 and 10)
• In each dialogue below, determine whether Philips committed any fallacy. If so, explain
what the main fallacy is. If not, you only need to write down "no fallacy".
• The example below shows how to formulate your answers.
• Assessment weight: 15% (1.5% for each question)
2
Example
Question:
Councilor Philips: "We'll have to cut education funding this year."
Councilor Aurora: "Why?"
Councilor Philips: "Well, either we cut the funding for education or we live with a huge
deficit and we can't live with the deficit."
Answer (name the fallacy and explain how Philips’ argument fits the fallacy):
This is a false dilemma.
Philips assumes that there only two choices (1) the government has to cut education or (2) live
with a huge deficit. But this is not true. There can be other choices such as increasing tax or
cutting other unnecessary government expenses. There are actually other choices.
Marking scheme:
1. Correct naming of the fallacy: 0.75% (this part must be correct in order to earn full marks)
2. Explanation: 0.75%
END