Gesture Recognition

Experiment Model Metrics Decision +

Number Explanation

1 Conv3D Accuracy : 50% Tried a basic model,

using Adam
Loss : 1.433 Optimiser having a
batch size of 32.
The model was
overfitting the data.

2 Conv3D Accuracy : 18.75% Added regularisation

parameters , here
Loss : 5.44 we saw a drop in
accuracy and the
model was still
overfitting

3 Conv3D Accuracy : 37.5% Added more

regularisation
Loss : 1.51 parameters , the
accuracy had nearly
doubled from the
previous model but
isn’t better than our
first model.

4 Conv3D Accuracy : 31.5% Changing frame size

from 10 to 20 is
Loss : 2.64 impacting the
training time but we
are not getting good
accuracy.

5 Conv3D Accuracy : 31% Changing frame

from 20 to 30. The
Loss : 4.83 previous experiment
gave us almost
similar accuracy
with a lower loss. So
we’ll stick to 20
frame size.

6 Conv3D Accuracy : 50% Changing Batch

Loss : 1.76 Size to 64. This has
not brought any
change to the first
experiment.
 7 Conv3D Accuracy : 43.75% Changing Image
Size (360*360) and
Loss : 3.082 Batch Size ( 32 ).

8 Conv3D Accuracy : 31% Changing Image

Size (360*360) and
Loss : 3.40 Batch Size ( 64 ).
The Hardware is not
able to handle the
image size and
batch size

9 Conv3D Accuracy : 50% Reducing the

network complexity
Loss : 1.54 since above models
are overfitting.

10 Conv3D Accuracy : 43.75% Increase further

complexity of the
model with more
Loss : 1.186 number of layers.
also, more
regularization is
added to check the
overfitting

Conclusion :

Overall the first experiment has the better metrics compared to the others and we
can also say that models with an image size of 180*180 having batch size 32 or 64 , with 4
CNN layer are working better.