You are on page 1of 115

a) Find P

Ps 1000 psig
Q 42 BPD
Pwf 580 psig

a) Find P

Pi 0.1 BPD/psig

b) Find q
*well potential pwf=0

q 100

c) PLot

Data to create plot P. vs q plot


P @ y axis P (psi) Q (BPD)
Q @ x axis 0 0
0 0

P vs Q
1200

1000

800
P (psi)

600 Column D

400
1000

800

P (psi)
600 Column D

400

200

0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Q (BPD)
Column D
Column D

0
Given Data
Ps 2000 psig *PS<Pb
Pwf 1500 psig
Pb 2500 psig
q 1000 BPD

a) Use Vogel equation to find qmax

qmax 2500 BPD

b) Plot Table

Pwf 0.2(Pwf/Ps) 0.8(Pwf/Ps) q/qmax q Pwf


0 0 0 0 1 2500 0
500 0.05 0.05 0.9 2250 500
1000 0.1 0.2 0.7 1750 1000
1500 0.15 0.45 0.4 1000 1500
ps=pwf= 2000 0.2 0.8 0 0 2000

c) Plot Graph

P(psig) vs q(BPD)
2500

2000

1500
P(psig)

1000

500

0
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
q (BPD)
1000

500

0
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
q (BPD)
Given Data
Ps 3200 psig *Ps>Pwf>PB
Pwf 2500 psig
Pb 1900 psig
q 2800 BPD

a) Find P

Pi 4 BPD/psig

b) Find qb

qb 5200 BPD

c) Find qmax

qmax 9422.222 BPD

d) Construct a straight line


1st Dot * q = 0 and P=Ps
2nd Dot Pb and qb
Fir dot 2nd dot
5200 0
1900 3200

5200
3500
3000
2500
P(psig)

2000
1500
1000
5200
3500
3000
2500

P(psig)
2000
1500
1000
500
0
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000

q (BPD)

e) Construct a curve line

qmax-qb 4222.2222222

Pwf 0.2(Pwf/Pb) 0.8(Pwf/Pb) (q/qb)/(qmax-qb) q


0 0 0 0 1 9422.2222222
500 0.0526315789 0.055401662 0.89196675900277 8966.0818713
1000 0.1052631579 0.2216066482 0.673130193905817 8042.1052632
1500 0.1578947368 0.4986149584 0.343490304709141 6650.2923977
pb 1900 0.2 0.8 0 5200
2500 0.2631578947 1.3850415512 -0.64819944598338 2463.1578947
3200 0.3368421053 2.2692520776 -1.60609418282548 0

Chart Pwf vs q (Pb->0)

3500

3000

2500
P(psig)

2000

1500

1000

500

0
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

q (BPD)
500

0
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

q (BPD)
5000 6000

0
500
1000
1500
1900
2500
3200

8000 9000 10000


8000 9000 10000
Given Data
Ps 2500 psig *Ps>Pb>Pwf
Pwf 1500 psig
Pb 1750 psig
q 600 BPD

a) Find qb

0.9722222222

0.2408163265

qb 459.52380952381 BPD

c) Find qmax

qmax 1042.8571428572 BPD

d) Construct a straight line


1st Dot * q = 0 and P=Ps
2nd Dot Pb and qb
Fir dot 2nd dot
459.52380952381 0
1750 2500

5200
3000

2500

2000
P(psig)

1500

1000

500

0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

q (BPD)
P(psig
1500

1000

500

0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

q (BPD)

e) Construct a curve line

qmax-qb 583.3333

Pwf 0.2(Pwf/Pb0.8(Pwf/Pb) (q/qb)/(qmq


0 0 0 0 1 5783.333 0
500 0.057143 0.0653061224 0.877551 5711.905 500
1000 0.114286 0.2612244898 0.62449 5564.286 1000
1500 0.171429 0.587755102 0.240816 5340.476 1500
pb 1750 0.2 0.8 0 5200 1900
Ps 2500 0.285714 1.6326530612 -0.918367 0 2500

pwf vs q
3500

3000

2500
P(psig)

2000

1500

1000

500

0
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

q (BPD)
Given Data
Ps 2400 psig *Ps>Pwf>Pb
Pwf 1800 psig
Pb 1750 psig
q 70 BPD
FE 70

a. a) Find pwf/ps
pwf/ps 0.75

b) Find q/qmax
Standing Chart 0.281

c) Find qmax@FE=1.0
qmax
SC
qmax 249.1103

d) Find q/qmax @ pwf=0


Standing Chart 0.87

c) Find qmax@FE=0.7
qmax
SC
qmax 216.726

b) Given data
Pwf 1200 Psig

a) Find pwf/ps
pwf/ps 0.5

b) Find q/qmax
Standing Chart 0.523

c) Find qmax@FE=1.0
qmax
SC
qmax 133.8432
a)

b)

Ps

c)

Ps

f)

500

450
500

450

400

350

300

Pwf(Psig)
250

200

150

100

50

0
0 200 400
Ps= 1800 psig
FE = 0.7
Answer
From test data and standing method , generate table ti determine average qmax @ FE=1

Test No Pwf(Psig) Pwf/Ps q/qmax @ FE =1 q qmax, FE=1


1 1800 0 0 0 0
2 1400 170 0.32 170 531
3 1180 300 0.45 300 667
3 980 400 0.59 400 678
calc standing chart calc 469 average q max

Assume several Pwf/Ps, standing chart and qmax average, generate table to plot IPR @FE = 0.7

q/qmax,
Pwf/Ps Pwf FE=0.6 Q @ FE =0.6

0.8 1440 0.2 94


0.6 1080 0.38 178
0.4 720 0.55 258
0.2 360 0.66 310
0 0 0.77 361 qmax

assume cacl standing chart

Assume several Pwf/Ps, standing chart and qmax average, generate table to plot IPR @FE = 1.3

Pwf/Ps Pwf q/qmax, Q @ FE =0.85


FE=0.85
0.8 1400 0.3 141
0.6 1080 0.5 234

0.4 720 0.69 324


0.2 360 0.81 380
0 0 0.94 441

assume cacl standing chart

Construct pwf vs q

Pwf vs q
500

450
Pwf vs q
500

450

400

350

300
Pwf(Psig)

0.85
250
0.6

200

150

100

50

0
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600

q (BPD)
d) Assume several Pwf/Ps, standing chart and qmax average, generate table to plot IPR @FE = 0.

q/qmax, Q @ FE
Pwf/Ps Pwf FE=1
=1.3
@FE=1.3
Ps 1850 0
0.8 1480 0.17 125
0.6 1110 0.33 244
0.4 740 0.47 347
0 0 0.7 517

assume cacl standing chart


rate table to plot IPR @FE = 0.5
a) Fetkovich Method

Ps= 1734 psia


x axis y axis

Pressure squared
Flow rate
Test # Pwf(psia) (STB/D) log (Q) difference (Ps2-
Pwf2)

1 1653 252 2.40 274,347.00


2 1507 526 2.72 735,707.00
3 1335 768 2.89 1,224,531.00

b) Plot Pwf vs q (IPR Curve)

Pwf Pwf/Ps q/qmax qo


1734 1 0.000 0.000
1600 0.92272202998847 0.242 362.311
1500 0.86505190311419 0.358 536.568
1400 0.80738177623991 0.456 683.285
0 0 1.000 1,499.84

n= (1/slope) 0.7451009611802 Plot graph Pwf vs IPR

c) qmax = C (Ps2 - Pwf2)^n


When Pwf = 0
qmax = 1,499.84

d) Standard Plot

6.2 (Ps2-Pwf2) vs Q (log )

f(x) = 1.34214228246628 x + 2.21514612471247


6

5.8

5.6

5.4
5.8

5.6

5.4

5.2

5
2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 3

e) Plot graph Pwf vs IPR

Pwf vs Q
2000

1800

1600

1400

1200

1000

800

600

400

200

0
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600
Log(Press
ure
squared C=
diff) (qo/(Ps2-
Pwf2)^2))
5.4383 0.02
5.866705 0.02
6.08797 0.02

aph Pwf vs IPR


Given data
Ps 3500
Pwf 2500
Q (BPD) 8000

a) PI = q/ (Ps -Pwf)
PI = 8

Ps (psig) PI (BPD/psig)
2000 6.7
1800 5.4
1600 4.5
1400 3.6
1200 1.5

b) Plot Pi/Pii, Where Pii = initial PI (PI@Pi) *Bestline

PI/PIi. vs Ps
0.9

f(x) = 0.0007625 x − 0.6775


0.8

0.7

0.6

0.5
Pi/Pii

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1
0.18
0
1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100

Axis Title

900

c) y = mx + c
y = 0.0008x - 0.6775
suppose the PI/Pii @900psig intercept at the line = 0.18
x= 900
y= 0.0425
PI/Pii= 0.18
a) PI = 1.44

b) Q max @ Ps = 3500psig
q max = PS x PI
qmax = 28,000

c) Q max @ Ps = 900psig
q max = PS x PI
qmax = 1,296

d) Plot IPR Curve (Future and Present)

P q
0 28000
3500 0
Q max @ Ps = 3500psig

P (psig) vs q (BPD)
4000

3500

3000

2500
P(psig)

2000 Present
Future
1500

1000

500

0
0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000
q (BPD)
psig
psig
BPD

BPD/psig

PI/PIi
0.8375
0.6750
0.5625
0.4500
0.1875

1900 2000 2100


psig

BPD/psig

BPD

BPD

P q
0 1296
900 0
Q max @ Ps = 900psig
a)

b)

c)

d)
d)

2500

2000

1500
Pwf(Psig)

1000
Pwf(Psig)
1000

500

0
0 200
Given data Present Future
A 40 acres Ps 2250 1800
Bo 4 Pwf 1815 0
Residual Oil Sat 0.15 % μ 3.11 3.59
PI 0.92 BPD/psig Bo 1.173 1.15
Swt 0.2 % So 0.768 0.741
Q 400 BPD/psig

Find Kro

PRESENT
Krop 0.8171475328

FUTURE
Kro 0.6834338683

From Pip @test data, Calculate PI*

Present Future
1.6453333333
0.9140740741

PRESENT
PI*p 1.0064829822

Adjust PI*p with PI*f by

0.1655404792
0.2239969334

FUTURE
PI*f 0.743821233

i)Find qmax (Present IPR)


qmax 1257.4749902

Pwf 0.2(Pwf/Ps) 0.8(Pwf/Ps) q/qmax q


0 0 0 1 1257.475
500 0.05 0.05 0.916049 1151.909
1000 0.1 0.2 0.753086 946.9873
1500 0.15 0.45 0.511111 642.7094
2000 0.2 0.8 0.190123 239.0755
2250 0.225 1.0125 0 0

iI)Find qmax (Future IPR)

743.82123304
1

qmax 743.82123304

Pwf 0.2(Pwf/Ps) 0.8(Pwf/Ps) q


0 0 0 743.8212
400 0.0444444444 0.0395061728 681.377
800 0.0888888889 0.1580246914 560.1617
1200 0.1333333333 0.3555555556 380.1753
1800 0.2 0.8 0

Construct Graph

Pwf vs q
2500

2000

1500
Pwf(Psig)

Present
Future

1000
Pwf(Psig)
Present
Future

1000

500

0
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400

q (BPD)
Given Data
Ps
Ps1
Ps2

A)

b)
Given Data
1345
1000
500

Fetkovich Method Ps

Ps= 1345 psia


x axis

Flow rate
Test # Pwf(psia) (STB/D) log (Q)

1 1345 0-
2 1242 66 1.82
3 1142 134 2.13
4 1123 137 2.14
5 921 229 2.36
6 1178 93 1.97
7 719 321 2.51
8 638 341 2.53

Fetkovich Method Ps Ps= 1345


Plot Pwf vs q (IPR Curve)
Pwf Pressure squared difference (Ps2- qo
Pwf2)
1345 0 0.000
1200 369025 98.008
1000 809025 214.529
500 1559025 412.866
0 1809025 478.929

n= (1/slope 0.998003992015968

qmax = C (Ps2 - Pwf2)^n


When Pwf = 0
qmax = 478.93

Fetkovich Method Ps1 Ps= 1000


Plot Pwf vs q (IPR Curve)
Pressure squared difference (Ps2-
Pwf qo
Pwf2)
1000 0 0.000
500 750000 198.907
100 990000 262.412
50 997500 264.396
0 1000000 265.058

n= (1/slope 0.998003992015968

qmax = C (Ps2 - Pwf2)^n


When Pwf = 0
qmax = 265.06

Fetkovich Method Ps2 Ps= 500


Plot Pwf vs q (IPR Curve)
Pwf Pwf/Ps qo
500 0 0.000
400 90000 23.970
200 210000 55.836
0 250000 66.448

n= (1/slope 0.980392156862745

qmax = C (Ps2 - Pwf2)^n


When Pwf = 0
qmax = 66.45
Standard Plot

(Ps2-Pwf2) vs Q (log )
3.00
y axis

Pressure squared
Log(Pressure
difference (Ps2- squared diff)
Pwf2) C= (qo/(Ps2- 2.50 f(x) = 1.00227606729112 x − 3.62493609575583
Pwf2)^2))
- - -
266,461.00 5.425633653422 0.0000
504,861.00 5.703171823183 0.0003
2.00
547,896.00 5.738698129812 0.0003
960,784.00 5.98262576212 0.0002
421,341.00 5.624633721665 0.0002
1,292,064.00 6.111284026166 0.0003
1.50
1,401,981.00 6.146742128002 0.0003

psia psia

1.00

0.50

0.00
5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.7 5.8 5.9

psia psia Plot graph Pwf vs IPR

Pwf vs Q
1600
Pwf vs Q
1600

1400

1200

1000

800

Pwf
600
psia
400

200

0
0.000 100.000 200.000 300.000 400.0

Q
(Ps2-Pwf2) vs Q (log )

3.62493609575583

5.6 5.7 5.8 5.9 6 6.1 6.2

Pwf vs Q
Pwf vs Q

200.000 300.000 400.000 500.000 600.000

Q
Given Data
Average reservoir pressure, psia 3360 psia
Reservoir temp 210 F
Gas specific gravity 0.734
Pseducritical pressure 658.7 psia
Pseducritical temperature 385.9 R

Flow Flow Rate Pseudopressure (10^6)


Press, Psia
period (Mscf/D) psia2/cp
1 1012 3317 744.01
2 2248 3215 706.79
3 3832 3020 636.75
4 5480 2724 533.73

RAWLINS Solution
& Step 1
SCHELLHA
RDT Generate table to plot pressure squared different vs q @ log scale & pseudopressure different vs q (log s
best straight line -> determine n and C
(Ps2-Pwf2)

Flow log (pressure


log Q Press, Psia
period squared diff)
Flow Rate Pressure squared
(Mscf/D) different
1 1012 3.0051805125 3317 287,111.00 5.46
2 2248 3.3517963069 3215 953,375.00 5.98
3 3832 3.5834255004 3020 2,169,200.00 6.34
4 5480 3.7387805585 2724 3,869,424.00 6.59

n = 1/ slope y = 1.536x + 0.8372


n= 0.6509992839

AOF Absolute open flow (AOF) is used to determine the flowing bottomhole presssure = atmosphoric pre
14.65psia.
Pwf
Ps
qg= 11,214.56 MMscfd C

HOUPEURTStep 2
(Ps2-Pwf2)
Flow Flow Rate Press, Psia Pseudopressure (10^6) (Ps2- Pwf2)/qg
period (Mscf/D) psia2/cp
Pressure squared
different
1 1012 3317 287,111.00 744.01 283.71
2 2248 3215 953,375.00 706.79 424.10
3 3832 3020 2,169,200.00 636.75 566.08
4 5480 2724 3,869,424.00 533.73 706.10

y = 0.0936x+200.71

a= 200.71
b= 0.0936

AOF Absolute open flow (AOF) is used to determine the flowing bottomhole presssure = atmosphoric pre
14.65psia.

Given Data
Average reservoir pressure, psia 3360 psia
Reservoir temp 210 F
Gas specific gravity 0.734
Pseducritical pressure 658.7 psia
Pseducritical temperature 385.9 R

Flow Flow Rate Pseudopressure (10^6)


Press, Psia
period (Mscf/D) psia2/cp
1 1012 3317 744.01
2 2248 3215 706.79
3 3832 3020 636.75
4 5480 2724 533.73

RAWLINS Solution
& Step 1
SCHELLHA
Generate table to plot pressure squared different vs q @ log scale & pseudopressure different vs q (log s
best straight line -> determine n and C
SCHELLHA
RDT Generate table to plot pressure squared different vs q @ log scale & pseudopressure different vs q (log s
best straight line -> determine n and C
(Ps2-Pwf2)

Flow log (pressure


log Q Press, Psia
period squared diff)
Flow Rate Pressure squared
(Mscf/D) different
1 1012 3.0051805125 3317 287,111.00 5.46
2 2248 3.3517963069 3215 953,375.00 5.98
3 3832 3.5834255004 3020 2,169,200.00 6.34
4 5480 3.7387805585 2724 3,869,424.00 6.59

n = 1/ slope y = 1.536x + 0.8372


n= 0.6509992839

AOF Absolute open flow (AOF) is used to determine the flowing bottomhole presssure = atmosphoric pre
14.65psia.
Pwf
Ps
qg= 11,214.56 MMscfd C

HOUPEURTStep 2
(Ps2-Pwf2)
Flow Flow Rate Press, Psia Pseudopressure (10^6) (Ps2- Pwf2)/qg
period (Mscf/D) psia2/cp
Pressure squared
different
1 1012 3317 287,111.00 744.01 283.71
2 2248 3215 953,375.00 706.79 424.10
3 3832 3020 2,169,200.00 636.75 566.08
4 5480 2724 3,869,424.00 533.73 706.10

y = 0.0936x+200.71

a= 200.71
b= 0.0936

AOF Absolute open flow (AOF) is used to determine the flowing bottomhole presssure = atmosphoric pre
14.65psia.
utk ap nie?
utk ap nie?
utk ap nie?

Pressure square diff vs Q (MMscfd) - log scale


pressure different vs q (log scale) -> 7

f(x) = 1.53607913156446 x + 0.837238037951218


6
Pseudopr C (flow
essure coefficient)
(10^6) 5
psia2/cp
744.01 0.2831
Ps^2 - Pwf^2)

4
706.79 0.2879
Column G
636.75 0.2874 Linear (Column G)
533.73 0.2820 3

1
presssure = atmosphoric pressure

14.5 psia 0
3360 psia 2.9 3 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8

0.2874 Q (MMscfd)

(Ps2-Pwf2/Qg) vs Qg
800

700 f(x) = 0.093632543603631 x + 200.707952372932


(Ps2-Pwf2/Qg) vs Qg
C (flow 800
coefficien
t)
0.00 700 f(x) = 0.093632543603631 x + 200.707952372932
0.00
0.00 600
0.00

500

400

300

200

100

presssure = atmosphoric pressure


0
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000

utk ap nie?
utk ap nie?
utk ap nie?

Pressure square diff vs Q (MMscfd) - log scale


pressure different vs q (log scale) -> 2.9
f(x) = − 0.182141247254193 x + 3.43592579199415
Pressure square diff vs Q (MMscfd) - log scale
2.9
f(x) = − 0.182141247254193 x + 3.43592579199415

2.85
Pseudopr C (flow Pseudopr
essure coefficient) essure
(10^6) (10^6)
psia2/cp psia2/cp
744.01 0.2831 2.871579 2.8

Ps^2 - Pwf^2)
706.79 0.2879 2.84929 Column T
636.75 0.2874 2.803969 Linear (Column T)
533.73 0.2820 2.727322 2.75

2.7

presssure = atmosphoric pressure

14.5 psia 2.65


2.9 3 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8
3360 psia
0.2874 Q (MMscfd)

(Ps2-Pwf2/Qg) vs Qg
C (flow 800
coefficien
t)
0.00 700 f(x) = 0.093632543603631 x + 200.707952372932
0.00
0.00 600
0.00

500

400

300

200

100

presssure = atmosphoric pressure


0
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
100

0
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
g scale

Column G
Linear (Column G)
000 5000 6000

log scale
log scale

Column T
Linear (Column T)

000 5000 6000


000 5000 6000
Given Data
WC = 0.1
GOR = 300 cuft/bbl
Ps= 2000 psig
PI = 0.3 BPD/psig

a) Find GLR
GLR = GOR X (1-WC)
GLR= 270
2500
0.27 Mmscfd

b) Plot IPR 2000

P q(bpd)
0 600
2000 0 1500

P(psig)
1070psi
c) Assume various q VLP Method 1 1000

Q, BPD THPeq Pwf eq Pwf, psi


assume depth , ft THPeq + Tubing depth
50 500 5500 1250 500
100 700 5700 1150
200 800 5800 1050
100psi
400 800 5800 1000
0
600 800 5800 1000 0

d) Assume various q VLP Method 2

Q, BPD Pwf, psi Pwf eq THPeq THP


assume THPeq + Tubing depth depth , ft psi
50 1833.33 7300 2300 450
100 1666.67 7500 2500 400
200 1333.33 6700 1700 250
400 666.67 4200 0 0
600 0.00 0 0 0

From plot calc


IPR or
formula
d) Find qmax
PI=q / (Ps - Pwf)
qmax = Ps x PI at Pwf = 0
600 BPD
P(psig) vs q(bpd)
2500

2000

IPR VLP Method 1

1500
P(psig)

1070psi
1000

VLP Method 2

500
Qmax = 600bpd

100psi
0
0 100 200 300
280bpd 400 500 600 700

q (bpd)
VLP Method 1

Qmax = 600bpd
Given Data
Depth 5200 ft
Ps 1850 psig
Pwf 1387 psig
GLR 400 cuft/bbl
Q 250 bpd

a) Find Pi
PI=q / (Ps - Pwf)
PI = 0.539957

b) Finf qmax

qmax = Ps x PI at Pwf = 0
998.9201 BPD

c) Plot IPR
P q(bpd)
0 998.9201
1850 0

d) Plot VLP for 3 tubing sizes to determine the Q optimum


VLP METHOD 2
Pwf THP
Tubing SizeQ (BPD) Pwf (psi) equivalen equivalen THP,psi
t depth t depth
(ft) (ft)
50 1757.4 10500 5500.00 750
100 1664.8 11250 6250.00 740
1.9 inch 200 1479.6 10000 5000.00 600
400 1109.2 7500 2500.00 300
600 738.8 6500 1500.00 170
50 1757.4 8750 3550.00 350
100 1664.8 9000 3800.00 700
2 3/8 inch 200 1479.6 9200 4000.00 650
400 1109.2 7500 2300.00 300
600 738.8 6000 800.00 100
50 1757.4 7000 1800.00 350
100 1664.8 7500 2300.00 400
3.5 inch 200 1479.6 7550 2350.00 350
400 1109.2 6000 800.00 100
600 738.8 5500 300.00 50
From plot curve curve curve
IPR or
formula

e) Plot the graph

P (psig) vs Q (bpd)
2000

1800

1600

1400

1200

1000

800

600

400

200
170psi
0
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Ps 1400
THP 100 psig
GLR 300 cuft/bbl
Pi 0.5 BPD/psi
Tubing Depth 5000

a) Finf qmax

qmax = Ps x PI at Pwf = 0
700 BPD

b) Plot IPR
P q(bpd)
0 700 = Present
1400 0

P q(bpd)
0 675
1350 0

P q(bpd)
0 650 = *Assume Future
1300 0

c) Assume various q VLP Method 1

Q, BPD THPeq Pwf eq Pwf, psi


assume depth , ft THPeq + Tubing depth
50 1500 6500 1350
100 1200 6200 1200
200 1000 6000 1000
400 900 5900 900
600 800 5800 900

e) Plot the graph

P (psig) vs Q (bpd)
1600

1400

1200

1000
1600

1400

1200

1000

800

600

400

200

0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

e) Find Ps dead
ps@dead 1350
THP = A*(GLR^B)*q / S^C
Researcher A B C
Gilbert 435 0.546 1.89
Given Data
Ps 2500 psig *Ps>Pb>Pwf
Pwf 1500 psig
Pb 1750 psig
q 600 BPD
h 75 feet
GLR 400 cuft/bbl 0.4 MCF/bbl
D 8100 ft
Dtubing 8025 ft

a) Find qb

0.972222

0.240816

qb 459.52381 BPD

c) Find qmax

qmax 1042.85714 BPD

c) Find Pi

Pi= q
Ps-Pwf

Pi= 600
1000

Pi= 0.6 BPD

d) Construct a straight line


1st Dot * q = 0 and P=Ps
2nd Dot Pb and qb
Fir dot 2nd dot
459.52381 0
1750 2500

P (psig) vs Q (bpd)
3000

2500

2000

1500

1000

500

0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

e) Construct a curve line

qmax-qb 583.3333

Pwf 0.2(Pwf/Pb0.8(Pwf/Pb(q/qb)/(qmax-qb) q 16 48
0 0 0 0 1 1042.857 1457.646 182.7649
500 0.057143 0.065306 0.877551020408163 971.4286 1357.807 170.2468
1000 0.114286 0.261224 0.624489795918367 823.8095 1151.474 144.376
1500 0.171429 0.587755 0.240816326530612 600 838.6456 105.1524
pb 2000 0.228571 1.044898 -0.273469387755102 300 419.3228 52.57622
Ps 2500 0 0 0

pwf vs q
3000

2500

2000
P(psig)

1500

1000

500

0
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
2000

P(psig)
1500

1000

500

0
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200

q (BPD) 170psi

d) Plot VLP for 2 tubing sizes to determine the Q optimum


VLP METHOD 2
THP
Pwf equivalent depth equivalen
Tubing Size Q (BPD) Pwf (psi) (ft)
t depth THP,psi
(ft)
1.9 inch 50 2416.667 13500 5475.00 600
100 2333.333 14500 6475.00 500
200 2166.667 13000 4975.00 550
400 1833.333 12500 4475.00 600
600 1500 9500 1475.00 125
2 3/8 inch 50 2416.667 9800 1775.00 250
100 2333.333 12000 3975.00 325
200 2166.667 10200 2175.00 300
400 1833.333 10000 1975.00 200
600 1500 9000 975.00 125

From plot curve curve curve


IPR or
formula

e) Plot the graph


e) Optimum System and Optimum Condition

Optimum System Optimum Condition


Q opt 600 BPD Pwf opt 1550psig
Tubing opt 1.9" THP opt 120psig
Choke Opt 0.75"
Average reservoir pressure, psia 3360 psia
Reservoir temp 210 F
Gas specific gravity 0.734
Pseducritical pressure 658.7 psia
Pseducritical temperature 385.9 R

Flow Flow Rate Press,


period (Mscf/D) Psia
1 1012 3317
2 2248 3215
3 3832 3020
4 5480 2724

Solution

Flow period Qg, Mscf/D P, psia dP^2 dp^2/Qg


Shut in 0 3360 - -
1 1012 3317 287111 283.706522
2 2248 3215 953375 424.099199
3 3832 3020 2169200 566.075157
4 5480 2724 3869424 706.09927

a = 200 psia^2/mscfd
b = 0.0935
Chart Title
800

700

600

500
dP^2/Qg

400

300

200

100

0
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 500

Qg, mscfd
4000 5000 6000

You might also like