Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This has reference to your Letter-query relative to the clarification regarding the
enactment of Resolution No. 2009-68 and Resolution No. 2009-69 and Ordinance No.
183 series of 2009 and Ordinance No. 184 series of 2009 which authorizes the
Municipal Mayor to augment a certain amount in the Annual Fund Budget CY 2008
under Capital Outlay of the Office of the Municipal Mayor.
1. Can these ordinances take effect without passing the third reading
requirement of an ordinance as provided for in Article 107(c) of the IRR of the
Local Government Code of 1991?
2. What is the vote requirement in the enactment of the ordinance authorizing to
augment an amount in the Annual Budget?
In reply to your first query, we invite your attention to DILG Opinion No. 109
series of 2007 dated November 23, 2007 where the Department held that:
We have enclosed herewith the full text of the aforequoted DILG Opinion No.
109 series of 2007 dated November 23, 2007 for a better appreciation of the stand of
the Department on the matter.
As to your second query for the authorization of the augmentation of the budget,
please be advised that said issue would be best answered by the Department of
Budget and Management which has the authority to settle issues regarding budgetary
matters.
However, we have also enclosed herewith the full text of the DILG Opinion No.
70 s. 2003 which discussed the difference between appropriation ordinances that direct
the payment of money and those which only authorize the appropriation of money, for
your better appreciation of the stand of the Department on the matter.
Copy Furnished:
Fn:Porciuncula_augmentation ordinance_Capoocan
ORD/LEGAL:WCP:AZL:DNB/jop