Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Aromatic Polyamides
LEO VOLLBRACHT
AKZO Fibres and Polymers Research, Arnhem, Netherlands
375
376 Synthesis by Step Polymerization
where flame resistance and thermal stability are required. The para products [Kevlarw (Du Pont)
and Twaronw (Akzo)] are not only flame resistant and thermally stable, but also display exceptional
strength and modulus values. Because of the special fibre properties which are unique and unknown
for commercially available synthetic and chemical fibres, these products form a class apart, denoted
by the generic standard name of aramides.? Reviews which in part or entirely cover the subject of
aromatic polyamides have been published in the literature. 2 - 8
There are a large number of wholly aromatic polyamides if all the possible ortho-, meta- and para-
oriented monomers are combined. However, only two of them are of commercial importance:
poly(m-phenyleneisophthalamide) (1; Nomex'") and poly(p-phenyleneterephthalamide) (2; PPDT,
Kelvare, Twaronw), PPDT is a combination of the abbreviations used for the monomers,
p-phenylenediamine (PPD) and terephthalic acid (T). Initially, Du Pont used poly(p-benzamide)
(PBA), but later on they changed over to PPDT. 2
-(-NH-o-NH~-cnt JNH-Q-'NHC
\ -
r \ r-t
II~-II" o 0
(1) (2)
The wholly aromatic polyamides cannot be prepared by melt polycondensation. The potential
polyamides either do not melt or melt at high temperatures with decomposition. Many aromatic
diacids will decarboxylate? and the aromatic diamines are readily oxidized and have a tendency to
sublime.P: 10 Consequently, use is made of low temperature polymerization methods. Since the
reactivity of aromatic diamines and aromatic dicarboxylic acids is too low, it is generally necessary
to employ aromatic carboxylic acid chlorides (equation 1). An acid acceptor is needed to bind the
hydrochloric acid evolved. Usually, the polymerization proceeds very rapidly. Two methods are in
use, viz. the interfacial polymerization method (a two-phase process) and the solution polymeriz-
ation method (a single-phase process). In interfacial polymerization, the reaction takes place at the
interface between a solution of the diacid chloride in an organic solvent (immiscible with water
under the conditions applied) and an aqueous solution of the diamine. 1 1 In the solution polymeriz-
ation method, the reaction simply takes place in a homogeneous solution. For the solution
polymerization of aromatic polyamides, it is advantageous to use aprotic polar amide solvents, such
as dimethylacetamide (DMAc), N-methylpyrrolidone (NMP) and hexamethylphosphoramide
[HMPA; phosphoric tris(dimethylamide)]. Dimethylformamide (DMF) is unsuitable because it
reacts with acid chlorides, nor is dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) of any use because of its violent
reaction with acid chlorides. HMPA, a powerful solvent, must not be used, since it is a carcinogen in
rats.P The dissolving power of the amide solvents can be increased by addition of salts, such as
lithium chloride or calcium chloride. The amide solvents further serve as acid acceptors, which is
why such compounds do not need to be added. Though these solvents are far weaker bases than the
primary aromatic diamines, the huge excess of solvent brings the polymerization to completion
without loss of diamine as an inactive hydrochloride. A further advantage of the amide solvents may
appear in the case of the more soluble aromatic polyamides, such as Nomexw. When the hydro-
chloric acid formed in the polymerization is neutralized with calcium hydroxide, calcium chloride, a
solvating agent, is formed, which leads to dissolution of the polymer so that the reaction mass can be
spun directly (combined process).
o 0
II II
ArNH 2 + Ar/CCI ----+ ArNHCAr' + HCI (1)
Suggestions for Nomexw manufacture are given in refs. 2 and 7. Proposals for a mechanism
accounting for the role of lithium chloride as a solvating agent for aromatic polyamides in DMAc
can be found in refs. 13 and 14. In general, high molecular weight wholly aromatic polyamides can
be obtained more consistently by low temperature solution polycondensation than by the interfacial
method.' The polymer prepared is usually isolated by coagulation and neutralization with aqueous
alkali, filtration, washing with water or an organic solvent and drying. The dry polymer is very liable
to be electrostatically charged. The two aromatic polyamides which are of commercial interest
(1 and 2) will now be discussed separately. A section will also be devoted to PBA, the forerunner of
PPDT. The same procedures can be followed for other aromatic polyamides and copolyamides.
The aromatic copolyamides are usually easier to prepare because of their better solubility. They will
be discussed in Section 22.1.4.
Aromatic Polyamides 377
o
~
~ ----. 1\NH-o-INH~--fjrfi
nC\goICC\
~ 6~O"
t + 2nHC\ (2)
Nomexw is used when heat and flame resistance are essential. Because of its attractive electrical
properties, which are retained at high temperatures, Nomexw is also used as an electrical insulating
material, in the form of fibre or paper.
Hermans'" for a different polymer, viz. poly(y-benzyl-L-glutamate). For spinning purposes, PPDT in
a high concentration is dissolved in 100% sulfuric acid, which gives rise to anisotropy of the solution.
The effect of the anisotropy of spinning solutions on yarn properties is smaller than generally
assumed. Weyland"? has elaborated some hypotheses on this subject.
Figure 1 Schematic representation of polymer states in solution: (a) random coils; (b) random rods; (c) rods in liquid-
crystalline arrays; and (d) nematic state for one array (reproduced with permission from ref. 4)
At a certain molecular weight, the rod-like character of the all-para polyamides cause the inherent
viscosity 1Jinh to be higher than for the corresponding meta polymers. According to ref. 28, an 1Jinh
value of 0.4 dl g-l for poly(m-benzamide) approximately corresponds to an 1Jinh value of 1.7dl g-l
for poly(p-benzamide). Furthermore, it makes a difference whether the inherent viscosity is deter-
mined in amide solvents containing lithium chloride or in concentrated sulfuric acid. The con-
siderable difference observed is attributed to the formation of aggregates in the amide solvent. 28,29
In ref. 29, molecular weight data as functions of the inherent viscosity are given for PBA and
PPDT. For spinning purposes, the inherent viscosity of the all-para-coupled aromatic polyamides is
reported to have a value of 5dlg- 1 or higher.P"
o o
-NH-oJ- -NH-Q--OJ!- -NH-Q-'NHC-Q-'
o
!!- - 11-
o
-NH-Q-NH~-O-O-!!-
o
-NH-Q-NHfi-Cl 0 -NH-Q-'NHC-D--!!N
'\ ~
- II -
o -
~
-NH
-NH~NHfi~ 0 -NH-o-'NHC~~ ~
~
~NHc~{I
II
o -
'\ rl.
-
- g ~-C-
3
~
~
~.
~
o~
Q
~
3
0
CI ~
~
- N-Q-
NHC~
g~_ -NH-o-NH~-o-N\--oJ_
~
H_
-NH
NHC~'
1\
o -
~ - -NH-o-N\-o-NH~-o-N~-oJ_
o
W
-J
\C
380 Synthesis by Step Polymerization
30
20
I sotropic ___ Optically
o - anisotropic
CL
10
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Weight percent polymer in solvent
Figure 2 Effect of polymer concentration and the formation of a liquid-crystalline solution on the bulk viscosity of solutions
ofpoly(chloro-l,4-phenylene/l,4-phenylene-2,6-naphthalamide) (70/30)in hexamethylphosphoramide-N-methylpyrrolidone
(1-1, vIv) containing 2.9% LiCI at 27°C; polymer '7inb = 2.0. Bulk viscosity was determined with a Brookfield Model RV
viscometer with a no. 6 spindle at 10 r.p.m. (reproduced with permission from ref. 4)
Intermediates
0
2S0CI 2 ~
OSNOCI + S02 + 3HCI
0
3HCI
ether
~ HCI'H2NOCI + SOCl 2
Polymerization
amide. ~
solvent
+ 2 amide·HCI
or
+
amide ~
solvent + S02 + amide·HCI
amide solvent and TDC is added with cooling in the molten state or as a solid material (powder or
flakes). The polymerization is very fast. The kinetics in HMPA have been studied by Borkent and
co-workers." by applying stopped-flow soectrophotometry.
nCI~OCI
o 0
amide .~
solvent
-t N H- o -NHC
r "
-
-r\-r-t
~\JIf-~ n
+ 20 amide·HCI (3)
Aromatic Polyamides 381
In a Celanese patent, the premixing of the solid reactants PPD and TDC is described.l" Care
should be taken that the solid reactants do not contain water, oxygen or carbon dioxide. This
method does not seem to offer special advantages, however.
PPDT is even less soluble than PBA. 3 7 So far, only two solvent systems have been found suitable
for solution polymerization on an industrial scale in which polymer of a sufficiently high molecular
weight is obtained. These systems are a solvent mixture of HMPA and NMP in the volume ratio 2: 1
and an NMP-ealcium chloride mixture. The use of a mixture of HMPA and NMP leads to higher
molecular weight polymers than the use of the neat solvents separately. 38,39 However, in a
continuous process, using a special technique of premixing the reactants and extrusion, use is made
of neat HMPA. 4 0 - 4 2 TheHMPA system was used by Du Pont until 1982. The NMP/CaCI 2 system
was discovered and patented by Akzo.t" As HMPA was found to be a carcinogen in rats,'? the
NMP/CaCI 2 system has become of special importance, especially since, after many years, no
commercial alternative has yet been found. As HMPA is no longer permitted for use in commercial
operations, we shall discuss briefly the use of the NMP/CaCI 2 system. Before it became known that
HMPA was a carcinogen in rats, Akzo had already found the NMP/CaCI 2 system as a result of a
special study to find an alternative to HMPA. The study was started because the use ofHMPA on a
plant scale would present serious difficulties. The compound is thermally and chemically unstable,
especially under acidic conditions, which results in incomplete recovery. Another objectionable
aspect is the formation (during polymerization, coagulation and recovery) of phosphorus-containing
degradation products. At the time (1974) the prospects of finding an alternative were not great.
World-wide, the prevailing idea was that amide solvent/salt systems were inferior to the mixed
solvent system HMPA/NMP"a conclusion which had been clearly expressed by Fedorov et al., who
had tried in vain to find an alternative.P" Sokolov had the same view.t" Of the unattractive amide
solvent/salt systems, DMAc/LiCI was considered to be the best. 14 , 3 8 , 4 4 Of the many possible
combinations, the NMP/CaCI 2 system was not considered by anybody; apparently 14, 38,44 because
it was expected to be even less attractive than the DMAc/LiCI system. Yet, it turned out that in this
system the same results can be achieved as in HMPA/NMP, but, to that end, it is necessary to use a
large amount of calcium chloride, preferably surpassing the solubility limit of 6% for calcium
chloride in NMP at room temperature. This seems strange and illogical, simply because of the
apparent uselessness of non-dissolved calcium chloride particles. However, when the polymerization
is started by the introduction of terephthaloyl dichloride, the calcium chloride particles quickly
dissolve, probably due to the complexation of calcium chloride with the amide groups which have
just formed, as a result of which calcium chloride is removed from the solution, which in turn results
in dissolution of the non-dissolved particles. Therefore, the amount of calcium chloride present
should be larger than the amount which dissolves at room temperature. The excess of calcium
chloride may then be present in a solid or supersaturated state. In our opinion, the complexation
renders the PPDT polymer more soluble, keeping it in a swollen state when a high degree of
polymerization is reached, as in the case ofHMPA/NMP. In this swollen state, the polymerization is
apt to continue, because it is still accessible to reactive species. Finally, a polymer is obtained that is
no different from the polymer produced in HMPA/NMP. The amount of calcium chloride is related
to the amount of polymer. For satisfactory results, the weight of calcium chloride should not be
lower than the weight of polymer to be formed (i.e. approximately equimolar), but preferably higher.
The polymer concentration should be as high as possible, of course, but the concentration to be
obtained depends on the equipment used and should be determined experimentally. The same
applies to the amount of calcium chloride. Amazingly, the shape of the apparatus and the mixing
efficiency can have a tremendous effect on the inherent viscosity. This is illustrated by the data in
Table 2. In this connection, a role is also played by the high speed of the polymerization reaction and
the resulting rapid onset of gelation.
Table 2 Influence of Apparatus on rJinh a
Apparatus
The polymerization is carried out with cooling and exclusion of moisture. Under proper
conditions, the viscosity is fairly independent of the monomer (polymer) concentration applied. For
HMPA/NMP, this dependency has been reported.t"
The effect of the calcium chloride concentration in NMP on the inherent viscosity of the polymer
produced differs strongly from that of lithium chloride in, for example, DMAc. At a low lithium
chloride concentration in DMAc, a peak is found in the curves of the inherent viscosity as a function
of lithium chloride concentration.l" Up to higher lithium chloride concentrations, the inherent
viscosity remains at a constantly low level. In contrast, after an initial steep rise, the inherent
viscosity of the polyamide in the NMP/CaCI 2 system will continue to increase with the calcium
chloride concentration and will remain far above the peak viscosity in the DMAc/LiCI system. The
absence of a peak viscosity is of importance in commercial production, because it makes the process
less sensitive to slight variations in the salt concentration. At a certain stage, depending on the
equipment used, the calcium chloride content has risen to the extent that it prevents proper mixing.
The inherent viscosity will then level off and begin to decrease. The function of calcium chloride in
PPDT polymerization in NMP is unique. An important point is the recovery of NMP and calcium
chloride, which proceeds without any problem.
Northolt''P-?" has determined the crystal and molecular structure of PPDT by X-ray diffraction.
Further studies by the same author on the elastic properties and the stress-strain behaviour in
relation to structure can be found in the literature.t" - 51
Kevlarw and Twaronv are used when properties such as high strength, high modulus and low
density are of advantage, viz. ropes, cables, reinforcement of rubber (tyres) and plastics. 52,53 An
interesting application may be the replacement of asbestos in automotive brake linings.
aration of two very similar polymers. Though for PPDT an inherent viscosity of 6.2 dl g - 1 has been
obtained, a rather complex reaction medium is required. Furthermore, the concentration of
reactants is low."? 0.08 moll- 1, vs. a value of 0.25 moll- 1 for the HMPAjNMP systerrr'" and
~ 0.25 mol kg - 1 for the NMPjCaCl 2 system. Application on an industrial scale is not expected for
the time being.
o
II
2nHCNMe 2 (4)
384 Synthesis by Step Polymerization
(5)
22.1.5.10 Polymerization using N -silylated aromatic diamines and aromatic diacid chlorides
This recently reported." reaction proceeds as shown in equation (6). Silylated m- and
p-phenylenediamine have been used; they were prepared by reaction of the diamines with trimethyl-
silyl chloride in the presence of triethylamine. The polymerization took place at -10°C in the
system HMPA/NMP containing approximately 50/0 of lithium chloride. High inherent viscosities
were obtained, also in the case of PPDT, for which a value of 7.4 dl g-1 was found. It is clear,
however, that this reaction is only useful in the laboratory.
o0 0 °
nMe 3SiNHArNHSiMe 3 II "
+ nCICAr'CCI ------+ 2nMe 3SiCI II "
+ +NHArNHCAr'C+ (6)
n
A third route 77 is applicable to copolyamides where the molten state is accessible, viz. acidolysis
(equation 9). This reaction type has been studied intensely in connection with all-aromatic poly-
esters;" but aromatic poly(ester amide)s can be made along the same lines.??
i
heat
ArC0 2H + Ar'NHAc ------+J ArCONHAr' + AcOH (9)
22.4 REFERENCES
1. M. S. Reisch, Chem. Eng. News, 1987, 65 (5), 9.
2. 1. Preston, in 'Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology', 3rd edn., ed. M. Grayson and D. Eckroth, Wiley-
Interscience, New York, 1978, vol. 3, p. 213.
3. W. Bruce-Black and 1. Preston, 'High-modulus Wholly Aromatic Fibres', Dekker, New York, 1973.
4. P. W. Morgan, Macromolecules, 1977, 10, 1381.
5. P~ W. Morgan, CHEMTECH, 1979,316.
6. P. W. Morgan, J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Symp., 1985, 72, 27.
7. T. Skwarski, Lenzinger Ber., 1978, 45, 28.
8. M. Jaffe and R. S. Jones, in 'Handbook of Fiber Science and Technology', ed.M. Lewin and J. Preston, Dekker, New
York, 1985, vol. III, part A, p. 349.
9. R. C. Blume (Du Pont Co.), US Pat. 3558571 (1971) (Chem. Abstr., 1971, 74, 88382n).
10. P. W. Morgan and S. L. Kwolek, Macromolecules, 1975, 8, 104.
11. P. W. Morgan, 'Condensation Polymers: By Interfacial and Solution Methods', Interscience, New York, 1965.
12. 1. A. Zapp, Science, 1975, 190, 422.
13. 1. R. Schaefgen, T. I. Bair, 1. W. Ballou, S. L. Kwolek, P. W. Morgan, M. Panar and 1. Zimmerman, in 'Ultra-high
Modulus Polymers', ed. A. Ciferri and I. M. Ward, Applied Science, Barking, 1979, p. 173.
14. A. A. Fedorov, V. M. Savinov and L. B. Sokolov, Polym. Sci. USSR (Eng/. Trans/.), 1971, 12, 2745.
15. P. W. Morgan, 'Condensation Polymers: By Interfacial and Solution Methods', Interscience, New York, 1965, p. 493.
16. Du Pont de Nemours Co., Br. Pat. 871581 (1961) (Chern. Abstr., 1961, 55, 24113e).
17. H. F. Mark, S. M. Atlas and N. Ogata, J. Polym. Sci., 1962, 61, S49.
18. 1. Preston and R. W. Smith (Monsanto Co.), US Pat. 3 225 011 (1965) (Chem. Abstr., 1965, 62, 14856h).
19. H. F. Mark, J. Polym. Sci., Part C~ 1965, 9, 1.
20. Du Pont de Nemours Co., Br. Pat. 877885 (1961) (Chem. Abstr., 1962, 56, 11844h).
21. 1. Preston and R. W. Smith, J. Polym. Sci., Part B, 1966,4, 1033.
22. Celanese Corp., Br. Pat. 979342 (1965).
23. H. S. Morgan, Jr. (Monsanto Co.), US Pat. 3 414 645 (1968).
24. R. E. Wilfong and J. Zimmerman, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 1973, 17, 2039.
25. P. J. Flory, Proc. R. Soc. London, Sere A, 1956,234, 73.
26. 1. Hermans, Jr., J. Colloid Sci., 1962, 17, 638.
27. H. G. Weyland, Polym. Bull. (Berlin), 1980, 3, 331.
28. J. Preston and W. L. Hofferbert, Jr., J. Polym. sa.. Polym. Symp., 1978, 65, 13.
29. 1. R. Schaefgen V. S. Foldi, F. M. Logullo, V. H. Good, L. W. Gulrich and F. L. Killian, Polym. Prepr., Am. Chern. Soc.,
Div. Polym. Chern., 1976, 17 (1),69.
30. M. Jaffe and R. S. Jones, in 'Handbook of Fiber Science and Technology', ed. M. Lewin and J. Preston, Dekker,
New York, 1985, vol. III, part A, p. 361.
31. S. L. Kwolek P. W. Morgan, 1. R. Schaefgen and L. W. Gulrich, Macromolecules, 1977,10,1390.
32. P. W.Morgan, 'Condensation Polymers: By Interfacial and Solution Methods', Interscience, New York, 1965, p. 193.
33. S. L. Kwolek (Du Pont Co.), US Pat. 3600 350 (1971) (Fr. Pat. 1 526745, 1968; Chem. Abstr., 1969, 71, 4426g).
34. J. Preston, in 'Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology', 3rd edn., ed. M. Grayson and D. Eckroth, Wiley-
Interscience, New York, 1978, vol. 3, p. 214.
35. G. Borkent, P. A. T. Tijssen, 1. P. Roos and J. J. van Aartsen, Reel. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas, 1976, 95, 84.
36. R. S. Jones (Celanese Corp.), US Pat. 4057536 (1977).
37. M. Jaffe and R. S. Jones, in 'Handbook of Fiber Science and Technology', ed. M. Lewin and J. Preston, Dekker,
New York, 1985, vol. III, part A, p. 359.
38. A. A. Fedorov, V. M. Savinov, L. B. Sokolov, M. H. Zlatogorsky and V. S. Greciskin, Sow. Beitr. Faserforsch. Textiltech.,
1973, 10 (5), 217.
39. B. Jingsheng, Y. Anji, Z. Shengquing, Z. Shufan and H. Chang, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 1981, 26, 1211.
40. T. F. Ficklinger, W. N. Jeter and K. K. Likhyani (Du Pont Co.), US Pat. 3849074 (1974).
386 Synthesis by Step Polymerization
41. 1. A. Fitzgerald and K. K. Likhyani (Du Pont Co.), US Pat. 3850888 (1974) (Chem. Abstr., 1975,82, 99881r).
42. A. R. Bice, 1. A. Fitzgerald and A. E. Hoover (Du Pont Co.), US Pat. 3884881 (1975) (Chem. Abstr., 1975,83, 115 383h).
43. L. Vollbracht and T. J. Veerman (Akzo.), US. Pat. 4308374 (1981) (Chem. Abstr., 1976,85, 160859v).
44. L. B. Sokolov, V. M. Savino v and V. S. Petrukhin, US Pat. 4169932 (1979).
45. T. I. Bair, P. W. Morgan and F. L. Killian, Macromolecules, 1977,10, 1396.
46. M. G. Northolt and J. J. van Aartsen, J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Lett. Ed., 1973, 11, 333.
47. M. G. Northolt, Eur. Polym. J., 1974, 10, 799.
48. M. G. Northolt and 1. J. van Aartsen, J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Symp., 1977,58,283.
49. M. G. Northolt, Polymer, 1980, 21, 1119.
50. M. G. Northolt, Br. Polym. J., 1981,13,64.
51. M. G. Northolt and R. van der Hout, Polymer, 1985, 26, 310.
52. Kh. Hillermeier and H. G. Weyland, Plastica, 1977,30,374.
53. R. E. Wilfong and J. Zimmerman, J. Appl. Polym. Sci.: Appl. Polym. Symp., 1977, 31, 1.
54. N. Yamazaki, F. Higashi and J. Kawabata, J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Chem. Ed., 1974,12,2149.
55. N. Yamazaki, M. Matsumoto and F. Higashi, J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Chem. Ed., 1975, 13, 1373.
56. F. Higashi, S. Ogata and Y. Aoki, J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Chem. Ed., 1982, 20, 2081.
57. W. R. Krigbaum, R. Kotek, Y. Mihara and J. Preston, J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Chem. Ed., 1984,22,4045.
58. W. R. Krigbaum, R. Kotek, Y. Mihara and J. Preston, J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Chem. Ed., 1985,23, 1907.
59. H. Shin (Du Pont Co.), US Pat. 4009153 (1977) (Chem. Abstr., 1977, 86, 141532n).
60. R. J. Angelo, R. N. Blomberg, F. P. Boettcher, R. M. Ikeda, M. R. Samuels (Du Pont Co.), US. Pat. 4104438 (1978).
61. R. M. Ikeda, R. 1. Angelo, F. P. Boettcher, R. N. Blomberg and M. R. Samuels, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 1980,25, 1391.
62. M. Ueda, S. Aoyama, M. Konno and Y. Imai, Makromol. Chem., 1978,179,2089.
63. Y. Imai, S. Aoyama, T. Nguyen and M. Ueda, Makromol Chem., Rapid Commun., 1980,1,655.
64. F. Higashi and T. Nishi, J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Chem. Ed' 1 1986, 24, 701.
65. F. M. Silver, Polym. Prepr., Am. Chem. Soc., Div. Polym. Chem., 1979, 20 (1), 207.
66. F. M. Silver, J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Chem. Ed., 1979,17,3535.
67. F. M. Silver and W. Bruce-Black, J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Chem. Ed., 1979,17,3543.
68. F. M. Silver, J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Chem. Ed., 1980, 18, 1787.
69. P. Strohriegl and W. Heitz, Makromol. Chem., Rapid Commun., 1985, 6, 111.
70. J. W. Spiewak, J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Chem. Ed., 1978, 16, 2303.
71. W. Memeger, Macromolecules, 1976,9, 195.
72. R. S. Jones (Celanese Corp.), US Pat. 3753957 (1973). (Ger. Pat. 2258567,1973; Chem. Abstr., 1973,79, 79486a).
73. R. S. Jones (Celanese Corp.), US Pat. 3901854 (1975).
74. R. S. Jones (Celanese Corp.), US Pat. 3870685 (1975) (Chem. Abstr., 1975,82, 171747w).
75. Y. Oishi, M. Kakimoto and Y. Imai, Macromolecules, 1987,20,703.
76. Y. Imai, M. Kajiyama, S. Ogata and M. Kakimoto, Polym. J., 1985, 17, 1173.
77. 0.1. Sikkema, Neth. Pat. 8600436 (1986).
78. G. W. Calundann, US Pat. 4161470 (1979) (Ger. Pat. 2844817,1979; Chem. Abstr., 1979,91, 58578q).
79. 1. E. McIntyre and A. H. Milburn, Br. Polym. J., 1981,13,5.
80. F. Dobinson, C. A. Pelezo, W. B. Black, K. R. Lea and J. H. Saunders, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 1979, 23, 2189.
81. I. P. Bragina, V. V. Korshak, G. L. Berestneva, S. V. Vinogradova, D. R. Tur, V. A. Khomutov and V. V. Krylova, Polym.
Sci. USSR (Engl. Transl.), 1976, 18, 2652.
82. Belg. Pat. 819043 (1974) (Ger. Pat. 2439948, 1975, Chem. Abstr., 1975, 82, 172487y).
83. Y. Iwakura, K. Uno and S. Hara, J. Polym. Sci., Part A, 1965,3,45.