INTEGRATED EXAMINATION ON

THE CONTEMPORARY WORLD

Name: Acosta, Niel Algrin F.

Course/Year: BSEd Science 2
Date: 7/29/2021

1. C
2. A
3. D
4. B
5. E
6. B
7. C
8. B
9. A
10. A
11. B
12. B
13. A
14. A
15. C
16. D
17. A
18. B
19. C
20. C
21. C
22. A
23. D
24. D
25. D
26. A
27. C
28. C
29. B
30. B

True or False
1. FALSE
2. TRUE
3. TRUE
4. TRUE
 5. TRUE
6. TRUE
7. TRUE
8. FALSE
9. FLASE
10. TRUE
11. TRUE
12. TRUE
13. TRUE
14. TRUE
15. TRUE
16. TRUE
17. TRUE
18. FALSE
19. TRUE
20. TRUE
21. FALSE
22. TRUE
23. FALSE
24. TRUE
25. TRUE
26. TRUE
27. TRUE
28. FALSE
29. TRUE
30. TRUE

III. IDENTIFICATION

1. Globalization
2. Cultural Globalization
3. Globalization
4. The so called "Hegemonic Sequence"
5. World system perspective
6. Global Marketing
7. National Loyalty
8. Division of labor
9. Specialization – International Specialization
10. Mass production
11. Negative Integration
12. Positive Integration
 13. Preferential agreement
14. Free Trade Area
15. Custom Union
16. Common Market
17. Economic Union
18. A Black Swan
19. Global Market integration
20. Aldo Leopold

IV. ENUMERATION: Enumerate what is being asked in each statement.

A. Drivers and aid of Globalization:
1. International Trade
2. Investment
3. Information Technology
B. Characteristic of Mcdonaldization according to Ritzer
1. Efficiency
2. Calculability
3. Predictability and Standardization
4. Control

C. Human aspects being affected by globalizaton

1. Economic Development
2. Ecological Environment
3. Socio-cultural
4. Political System
5. Human Physical Being

ESSAY
1. Throughout his writing Leopold has concerns that people in general are not attentive to
nature, and this makes them both miss out on its wonder and make poor decisions
regarding its care. Much of his disappointment in this matter is targeted toward those
who should know better—the professors, experts, policymakers, and even
conservationists who seem to know so much and understand so little.

Here he suggests that obtaining knowledge of one sort—academic—means giving up

understanding of another, vital ethical sort.

2. He states, "Human civilization is now the dominant cause of change in the global
environment. Yet we resist this truth and find it hard to imagine that our effect on the
earth must now be measured by the same yardstick used to calculate the strength of
 the moon's pull on the oceans or the force of the wind against the mountains. And if we
are now capable of changing something so basic as the relationship between the earth
and the sun, surely we must acknowledge a new responsibility to use that power wisely
and with appropriate restraint. So far, however, we seem oblivious to the fragility of the
earth's natural systems."

3. Within this story a structure of knowledge can be established, with it’s human
significance, from the physics of the universe and it’s chemistry through geology and
biology to economics and commerce and so to all those studies whereby we fulfill our
role in the Earth process. There is no way of guiding the course of human affairs through
the perilous course of the future except by discovering our role in this larger
evolutionary process.

4. The relationships between people and land are intertwined: care for people cannot be
separated from care for the land. A land ethic is a moral code of conduct that grows out
of these interconnected caring relationships. He believed that direct contact with the
natural world was crucial in shaping our ability to extend our ethics beyond our own
self-interest. He hoped his essays would inspire others to embark or continue on a
similar lifelong journey of outdoor exploration, developing an ethic of care that would
grow out of their own close personal connection to nature.

5. McDonaldization of society is a phenomenon that occurs when society, its institutions,

and its organizations are adapted to have the same characteristics that are found in fast-
food chains. These include efficiency, calculability, predictability and standardization,
and control. changes within science, economy, and culture have shifted societies away
from Weber's bureaucracy to a new social structure and order that he calls
McDonaldization. As he explains in his book of the same name, this new economic and
social order is defined by four key aspects.