You are on page 1of 6

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/269003141

Design Criteria of Equestrian Park: The Case of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

Conference Paper · November 2006

CITATIONS READS

0 1,670

1 author:

Latif Gürkan KAYA


Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University
86 PUBLICATIONS   454 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Peysage View project

Ekonomik Ömrünü Tamamlamış Maden Ocaklarından Rekreasyon Amaçlı Yararlanma Olanakları View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Latif Gürkan KAYA on 02 December 2014.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


S-043
Design Criteria of Equestrian Park:
1
The Case of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

KAYA, L.G.*

* ZKÜ Bartın Orman Fakültesi, Peyzaj


Mimarlığı Bölümü

Abstract
The Equestrian Park is proposed to be
redeveloped because of its high visibility to many
users such as different equestrian groups,
Figure 1. Alluvial and Terrace Deposits along the North
shows, auctions, competitions, breed shows, etc. Canadian River (Source: USGS, 1996)

The case area is between the east side of Many cities have experienced significant
Portland Avenue and the west side of I-44. This revitalization as direct result of their efforts to
site selected as a main equestrian center reclaim urban rivers as sites for primary public
because of grading and construction problems, assembly and recreation. Projects such as the
easy access, and providing other recreational River-walk in San Antonio, was built during the
activities such as picnicking, walking and jogging, depression of the 1930s, is not really that big-if
water features, etc. Therefore, the project of the you were not pausing you could walk it all, both
case area includes mentioned features and D-shaped, older-part and newer extension, in a
facilities. It is hoped that this will make these somewhat hurried hour. Originally the river-walk
facilities a successful regional attraction for the was a promenade where already set up
many hundreds of people and horses involved in institutions: hotels, restaurants, office buildings,
showing, rodeo, and other equestrian activities at and apartment houses opened their doors onto
the Equestrian Park. the river (SCVB, 1998). Another example of river
walk design is the Housatonic River in Berkshire
As a conclusion, according to the determined County, Massachusetts. It is a “working river”
design criteria of the Equestrian Park, the abused by years of industrial waste and neglect.
program elements have been evaluated in a It is also a river of great wildlife beauty (GBLC,
matrix. After this evaluation, four design 1996).
alternatives have been developed. The The equestrian park area best suited for
alternatives have been mixed up and created an some type of bio-filtration is located based on
appropriate proposal master plan. natural factors (creeks, river basin, etc.). Defined
retrofit is the opportunity to include water quality
Keywords: Equestrian Park, Oklahoma City, improvement features, such as bio-swales or
Horse trail, Stable wetlands, which are not part of the original site
design or use (Weigand and Martha, 1992).
1. Introduction Those were directed to developing a plan for the
Like most major metropolitan cities, Equestrian Park that may not only be
Oklahoma City was established near a body of recreationally based, but also may respect
water, in this instance the North Canadian River. existing natural-river, creeks, soil, vegetation,
The river has had a major impact on the and manmade system-roads, buildings, etc. In
development of Oklahoma City from its initial the report of project begins the task of matching
conception (Figure 1). the capabilities of the Equestrian area with the
present and future needs of Oklahoma City.
The Equestrian Park has closely designed
with the North Canadian River Development
Project and has been considered to design four
categories of goals, which are recreational,
environmental, social and economic. The list of
1
goals that follows can be considered an outline of
A summary of graduate project which was prepared by Latif Gürkan the intended result of an implementation of the
Kaya in 1998 at the University of Oklahoma, College of Architecture,
Division of Landscape Architecture. design of Equestrian Park.

1198
Followings are explanation of recreational goals neurological damage to building confidence
and objectives: and self-esteem.
A. Improve recreational resources in the D. One outdoor arena with grandstand seating
Equestrian Park area. overlooking the river and trails, with seating
a. Passive Recreation: capacity of 1,000 and with an adequate
 Improve the visual recreational concessions and comfort facilities.
experience that occurs during the E. Rental and boarding stables containing not
equestrian activities in the area. less than 30 separate covered stalls.
 Encourage nature-based and non- F. First quality food, beverage, and
consumptive recreation. entertainment facilities, including but not
limited to, at least one restaurant and club in
 Encourage the relations between human
addition to any such facilities in a hotel, the
and animals.
total square footage attributed to say facilities
 Develop the river and pond corridor to should involve 7,500-25,000 square feet.
encourage the environmental education G. A horse conditioning facility containing at
and interpretive activities. least two round pens and two horse walkers.
 Considered at least one mile of horse
trail system.
2. Methods
b. Active Recreation:
The facilities of the Equestrian Park are
 Expand equestrian facilities such as designed specifically for the people in the horse
rodeo, showing, riding horse, industry and for those who like activities
hunter/jumper course, etc. surrounding the equestrian life. The followings
 Provide trail-based recreational are considered in the methods:
opportunities for horseback riders, hikers  Develop the equestrian park as a commercial
and joggers. and recreational equestrian center.
 Provide other recreational activities such  Build a horse show arena which will consist
as picnicking, walking, water features, of 1,000 seats and open-air parking lots for
etc. at least 300 vehicles.
 Provide at least one hunter/jumper  Plan includes the rental and boarding
course. stables, an operation stables, a recreational
B. Improve physical and visual access to the vehicle parking for trailers, and a
park area. hunter/jumper course. Stabling and lodging
 Provide right of public access that facilities for horses and equine owners,
functions as part of the Equestrian Park. trainers, exhibitors and handlers.
How access between the park and the  A retail/office/western style multi-purpose
adjacent property are accommodated complex will include craft and specialty
and/or controlled are discussed along with shops, restaurant and offices.
any horse and pedestrian trails or linkage
 Over 1 mile of horse trails and
systems that are to be submitted.
walking/jogging trails. The trails also allow
 Link the park to nearby activity generators, horse access to the other nearby parks as
including the existing and the future parks they are developed.
that may be set up.  An information and equestrian center office
 Parking sufficient to service to service all having a minimum 1,500 square feet.
facilities with minimum parking required by  A minimum of three separate covered picnic
the applicable city regulations, and with areas.
heavily landscaped and grassed islands
 Appropriate landscaping and outdoor
consistent with the quality of the
lighting.
Equestrian center theme.
C. Accommodate special recreational needs  Support facilities including, but not limited to,
that may involve outdoor bazaar/fair area, barns, sheds, housing, hay storage, feed,
special horse riding activities such as the storage facilities, and pastures.
therapeutic equestrian programs that have
proven to be very effective in rehabilitating all The case area has been evaluated according
types of disabilities, from repairing to recreation criteria of Simonds (1983) (Table 1).

1199
The design of the Equestrian Park is not an 4. Pasture 16. Picnic facilities
5. Hay storage 17. Fair
actual project that was only considered 6. Holding corral facilities/Outdoor
redevelopment or a conceptual design for the 7. Food, beverage, and bazaar (no heavy
final project. The design process is a constructed environmental facilities’ area constructions;
series of logical decisions made by range of (restaurants, clubs, hotel, event tents, and
shopping, etc.) etc. possible)
users and me alike at pre-determined intervals. 8. Hunter/jumper course 18. Open space
The system of checks and balances build into the 9. Trailer parking 19. Pond and Water
process assures an acceptable solution to the 10. Horse trail features
users. 20. Bio-filtration

Table 1. The Existing Conditions of Equestrian Park Table 2 illustrates connections among the
Area (Adapted from Simonds, 1983) program elements. If the connection is good , the
CRITERIA GOOD AVERAGE POOR value is “+”; if not it is “-”. “0” is neutral that
REGIONAL
means limited connection and/or no connection
Climate x
at all.
Table 2. Matrix of Program Elements
Soil x
Water supply and quality x
Economy x
Transportation x
Energy x
Landscape character x
Cultural opportunities x
Recreational opportunities x
Health care facilities x
COMMUNITY
Time distance work, shopping, x
etc.
School x
Shopping x
Cultural opportunities (library, x
etc.)
Public services (fire, police, etc.) x
Medical facilities x
NEIGHBORHOOD
Landscape character x
Life style x
Traffic-ways (access, hazard, x
4. Conclusions and Recommendation
etc.)
Parks, recreation, open space, x In the study, due to the results, four design
etc.
Exposure(sun, wind, flooding, x alternatives have been developed:
etc.)
Utilities x  Design Alternative-1 is considered 3 different
PROPERTY pieces that are show ring; stable complex and
Size and shape x multi-purpose are with hunter/jumper course.
Safe entrance x This alternative is the final decision because
Existing plant materials x of its suitability in the area. First of all show
Ground forms and gradients x ring is supposed to distance from highway
Site drainage x system because of noises; however, it is good
Neighbors x for the access. Secondly, stable complex is in
Relationship to circulation
x
the middle of the area because of the huge
patterns
area for the pasture, trailer and car parking
and trails, and most important reason is bio
3. Results filtration systems with ponds that are really fits
The necessary program elements for the in this part. Third part is multi-purpose area
Equestrian Park in Oklahoma City were that is close the highway because of the easy
determined as follows: access for clubs and hotels.
 Design Alternative-2 is thought again three
1. Outdoor arena-show ring 11. Information center
(seating capacity 1,000) 12. Parking lots pieces. However this one involves stable
2. Judges shelter 13. Entry gates complex that is located nearby Portland
3. Stable buildings(rental, 14. Restrooms Avenue with the bio-filtration and pond
operation and boarding) 15. Walkway

1200
systems because of the easy access from
th
Portland and SW 15 Street. Although this 5. References
alternative does not closely fit in the area Gallagher, T., The lower Housatonic River
because stable complex needs much more guide from Lake Zoar to Long Island Sound,
spaces than the considered area. Show ring http://www.connix.com/~hypercog/river/River.htm
is especially really suitable in center because 1997.
of the enough parking spaces and trail GBLC, Housatonic river walk, riverbank clean-
systems. Third piece is considered same as up, Great Barrington Land Conservancy
first alternative. Barrington, MA. http://www.gbriverwalk.org,
 Design Alternative-3 looks like first design 1996.
alternative; however, it involves some Gralla, S. Design of a Major Equestrian
differences that in the center stable complex development as a part of the “String of Pearls”
is approached pond because of the bio- Parks in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. Gralla
filtration systems and enough parking spaces. Architects, Planners, Consultants, Oklahoma
This alternative is not good for show ring City, OK, 1989.
complex because people will need close Kaya, L.G., Equestrian park design,
parking lots nearby there. This alternative Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. Graduate Project.
also does not include hunter/jumper course. University of Oklahoma, College of Architecture,
This area was considered equine trail Division of Landscape Architecture. Norman,
systems and multi-purpose area. Oklahoma. Thesis/dissertation/manuscript iv, 33
 Design Alternative-4 includes stable complex leaves : p., maps, plans ;, 28 cm. 1998.
that is approached pond because of the bio- SCVB, San Antonio’s River Walk, the San
filtration systems and enough parking spaces. Antonio Convention & Visitors Bureau, a
This alternative is not good for show ring Department of the City of San Antonio, is funded
complex because people will need close through a hotel/motel occupancy tax.
parking lots nearby there. This area was http://sanantoniocvb.com/PRRiv.htm, 1998.
considered equine trail systems and multi- Simonds, J. O. Landscape Architecture, a
purpose area. The alternative has a manual of site planning and design. McGraw-Hill
temporarily hunter/jumper course that allows Book Inc. USA,1983
seasonal use because users can need extra USGS, Alluvial and terrace deposits along the
open space for some type of activities. North Canadian River in East-central Oklahoma,
US Geological Survey Open-File report 96-448,
Above mentioned alternatives have been http://water.usgs.gov/public/pubs/ofr/ofr96-
mixed up and created an appropriate proposal 448/index.html, 1996.
master plan for an equestrian park (Figure 2). Weigand, L. and Martha, K., The retrofit
suitability model for the Dogfish Creek sub-basin
of Liberty Bay. University of Washington, Seattle,
WA., 1992.

Figure 2. Proposal Equestrian Park Design for the Oklahoma


City, OK

1201

View publication stats

You might also like