Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DOI: 10.1111/gcb.14171
n
Rodrigo Mogollo | Paulo H. R. Calil
KEYWORDS
Bakun’s hypothesis, build up of atmospheric CO2, eddy-driven effects, global warming-induced
wind intensification, latitudinal variability of primary production, Northern Humboldt Current
System, response of biological production
1 | INTRODUCTION 2017; Montes, Schneider, Colas, Blanke, & Echevin, 2011; Sanchez,
Calienes, & Zuta, 2000). This intrinsic variability makes the HCS resi-
The Humboldt Current System (HCS) sustains high levels of biologi- lient to natural climate variability (Bakun et al., 2015).
cal productivity due to yearlong upwelling-favorable southeast trade Previous studies show that Eastern Boundary Upwelling Systems
winds, which induce the vertical advection of cold, nutrient-rich and (EBUS’s) are very sensitive to climatic perturbations particularly in
oxygen-poor waters from relatively shallow depths (Strub, Combes, terms of deoxygenation, acidification and sea level rise (Bakun et al.,
Shillington, & Pizarro, 2013; Strub & Mesıas, 1998). The low-latitude 2015; Doney et al., 2012). In addition, the acceleration of the upwel-
of the HCS allows a strong upwelling circulation due to larger off- ling circulation, which is a direct consequence of the increase in upwel-
shore Ekman transport but also makes it very sensitive to equatorial ling-favorable winds, is potentially an important consequence of
~ o Southern Oscillation (ENSO)
oceanic perturbations, such as El Nin climate change in these highly productive areas. This hypothesis was
n & Calil,
(Colas, Capet, McWilliams, & Shchepetkin, 2008; Mogollo initially proposed by Bakun (1990), who anticipated that the increase
Glob Change Biol. 2018;1–12. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/gcb © 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd | 1
2 | MOGOLLON AND R CALIL
in anthropogenic greenhouse gases, such as CO2, would lead to the the adjacent Eastern South Pacific (ESP). The horizontal resolution of
intensification of coastal upwelling in EBUS’s, particularly in the HCS the model grid is 1/12° (~9 km) with 30 vertical sigma levels
rrez et al., 2011). This is due to an increase in the land–sea ther-
(Gutie stretched toward the surface (approximately 18 levels over the con-
mal gradient that has been occurring as a consequence of global tinental slope). The topography is derived from the General Bathy-
warming in several EBUS’s (Sydeman et al., 2014). The mechanism metric Chart of the Oceans (GEBCO_2014 Grid, version 20150318,
works as follows: In normal conditions, a thermal low pressure cell is (www.gebco.net), which has a grid spacing of 30 arc sec (Weatherall
developed at the continental mass and a high pressure zone at the et al., 2015). It was smoothed in order to reduce pressure gradient
adjacent ocean. This is primarily due to the increased heating on land computation errors (Marchesiello, McWilliams, & Shchepetkin, 2003).
during the day and cooling at night when compared to the adjacent The hydrodynamical model is the Regional Oceanic Modeling
ocean. However, in a global warming scenario, the accumulation of System (ROMS-AGRIF) (Shchepetkin & McWilliams, 2005, 2009).
anthropogenic greenhouse gases would lead to an inhibition of the ROMS is a split-explicit, free surface oceanic model that solves the
nighttime radiative cooling, resulting in an enhancement of the day- primitive equations, based on the Boussinesq approximation and
time heating. This would induce to an intensification of the continental hydrostatic vertical momentum balance and is vertically discretized
thermal lows adjacent to the upwelling regions. in terrain-following curvilinear coordinates.
The consequences of this intensification would be (i) an Regional oceanic modeling system was forced at the boundaries
increased cross-shore atmospheric pressure gradient, (ii) the subse- with a monthly climatology constructed for the period 1999–2009
quent intensification of the alongshore geostrophic wind that drives from an eddy-permitting global ocean reanalysis, namely the CMCC
an offshore Ekman transport at the surface layer and (iii) the general Global Ocean Reanalysis System (C-GLORS) V.4 (Storto, Masina, &
acceleration of the coastal upwelling circulation. Bakun’s hypothesis Navarra, 2016), which was forced by ERA-Interim atmospheric vari-
tends to be a spring-summer phenomenon in the subtropics, while in ables with data assimilation of temperature and salinity profiles as
Peru it becomes a year-round phenomenon due to its proximity to well as sea level anomalies, sea ice concentration, sea surface tem-
the Equator (Bakun & Weeks, 2008). perature and mixed layer depth. It has a horizontal resolution of
Lachkar and Gruber (2013) explored the response of biological 0.25°.
production and air–sea CO2 fluxes to the upwelling intensification in At the surface, ROMS is forced with net shortwave radiation
two EBUS’s, namely the California and the Canary Current System extracted from j-OFURO V.3 (Kubota, Iwasaka, Kizu, Konda, & Kut-
using a NPZD-type ecosystem model. They found that a doubling of suwada, 2002) (obtained from http://dtsv.scc.u-tokai.ac.jp/j-ofuro/)
the wind stress magnitude doubles primary production in the south- as a monthly climatology at 0.25° resolution computed from 2002 to
ern California and central/northern Canary CS, while in the central/ 2007. For the computation of the kinematic surface net heat sensi-
northern California and southern Canary CS the increase in primary tivity to the sea surface temperature the air temperature, specific
production in response to the same wind variation is more modest. humidity and wind speed from j-OFURO database were used. The
In this work we assess the effect of intensifying winds on pri- evaporation and precipitation monthly climatology rates come from
mary production in the NHCS and the associated biological response the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute’s objectively analyzed air–
in a climatological sense. Our methodology follows that of Lachkar sea heat fluxes (WHOI OAFlux V.3) available at http://oaflux.
and Gruber (2013) in that we simulate the upwelling intensification whoi.edu, and from the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission
trend using an idealized experiment which consists in varying the (TRMM_TMI V.3) available at www.remss.com/missions/tmi at 1°
wind forcing. The work is organized as follows. In Section Materials and 0.25° horizontal resolution, respectively, both computed from
and Methods, the physical–biogeochemical model and the numerical 1998 to 2006. The monthly wind stress climatology comes from the
experiments are described. The strengthening of the wind forcing is QuickSCAT satellite scatterometer (Liu, Tang, & Polito, 1998; Risien
detailed and the methods used for all the analyses are provided. In & Chelton, 2008) for the period 1999–2009. In order to account for
Results, we describe the effect of the induced wind trend on biologi- air-sea feedbacks, a relaxation to the sea surface temperature
cal production. We also assessed other eddy and wind-driven factors extracted from the Group for High Resolution Sea Surface Tempera-
that may negatively affect the latitudinal variability of primary pro- ture (GHRSST)—Operational Sea Surface Temperature and Sea Ice
duction. In Discussions we evaluate the Bakun’s hypothesis and the Analysis (OSTIA) of 5 km resolution (Donlon et al., 2012), was
overall biological response. An evaluation of our model experiment imposed following the parameterization of Barnier, Siefridt, and
against available observations may be found in the supporting infor- Marchesiello (1995). The sea surface salinity involved in the restoring
mation (from Appendices S1 to S4). terms was obtained from the World Ocean Atlas 2013 V.2 of 0.25°
horizontal resolution (Zweng et al., 2013).
A monthly climatology of the net heat fluxes, computed from
2 | MATERIALS AND METHODS
1999 to 2009, was extracted from The European Centre for Med-
ium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Ocean Analysis System
2.1 | Model setup
ORAS3 (Balmaseda, Vidard, & Anderson, 2008). In spite of its
The domain spans the region between 70°W to 100°W and from lower spatial resolution of 1° when compared to COADS (0.5°) (Da
4°N to 26°S (Figure 1), encompassing the whole of the NHCS and Silva, Young, & Levitus, 1994), it does not lead to a warm bias at the
MOGOLLON AND R CALIL | 3
8 °N
Domain of simulation
0° Ecuador
Galápagos
Islands
200 Km
Punta Falsa
Domain of analysis of
8 °S
the wind intensification Chimbote Peru
Latitude
Callao
Pisco
Counterintuitive Zones
San Juan
16 °S
24 ° S
Chile
105 °W 100 °W 95 °W 90 °W 85 °W 80 °W 75 °W 70 °W 65 °W
Longitude
F I G U R E 1 Domain of simulation (black dashed line). The domain of analysis related with the wind intensification is shown as a green area
within the first 200 km nearshore. Red squares depict the counterintuitive zones
of the zonal slope means that the zonal component of the wind is to temporal trends in ship sizes and associated anemometer heights,
strengthening westward, while the positive sign of the meridional trends in relative frequencies of measured winds and nonhomo-
slope means that this component is strengthening northward. During geneities in recording and archiving practices (Bakun et al., 2010).
almost a decade the zonal and meridional component were Within our spatio-temporal domain of analysis, we found that the
enhanced (with respect to their long-term mean) by, approximately, magnitude of the averaged meridional component of the wind stress
38.5% and 33.5% respectively. is actually more than twice ( 2.3 times) the zonal one, which is
Narayan, Paul, Mulitza, and Schulz (2010) found a slope of reflected in a total wind intensification of 34.2% during a decade.
4 2 1
0.4 9 10 Nm month for the meridional wind component Since there exists low confidence in common trends in upwelling-
using COADS (four times coarser than CCMP horizontal resolution) favorable winds among EBUS’s (Narayan et al., 2010; Stocker, 2014),
from 1960 to 2000. This value is a third of the slope estimated in we may not discard the role of multidecadal climate variability in the
our period of analysis. The scale of the coastal intensification (tens observed trends. Thus, these findings, related with the wind intensi-
of kilometers) could partially explain this difference (Bakun, Field, fication percentages, should not be viewed as predictions, but rather
Redondo-Rodriguez, & Weeks, 2010). On the other hand, Bakun as reference values in order to perform a sensitivity study. Next, the
(1990) found a slope of 4.5 9 103 N m2 month1 from a 30 year numerical experiments and the rounded percentage values for the
linear trend (from mid 50s to mid 80s) of the alongshore wind stress idealized wind strengthening are detailed.
estimated between 4.5°S and 14.5°S within the coastal area. This
value is larger than the one used in this paper, basically because we
2.3 | Model experiment configuration
calculated the trend from the meridional rather than the alongshore
component of the wind stress, from 6°S to 15°S and over a wider A climatological simulation was run for 25 years starting from rest
area (200 km). The difference could also be explained by the differ- only with the hydrodynamical model. Statistical equilibrium is
ent period chosen for the analysis. Furthermore, uncertainty may reached after 10 years of model run (not shown). We kept the phys-
arise from an artificial long-term increasing trend on the winds due ical state of the end of year 25 to use it as the initial conditions in
which PISCES was coupled, starting with the biogeochemical clima-
tological conditions of January. After a spin-up of 5 years, the bio-
geochemical tracers reach a nearly repeating annual cycle. The
Meridional component
0.08 Ty : 1.20e–04 , 0.039 model solution used in this study is an average of the last 3 years of
simulation, from years 6–8, in order to remove the interannual vari-
0.07
ability. Hereafter, we refer to this solution as the “modern
0.06 winds”experiment. In order to reproduce the increase of upwelling-
favorable winds in the HCS, another simulation was performed in
0.05 which the zonal and meridional wind stress components were
increased by 40% and 35%, respectively (see Section Wind Intensifi-
0.04
)
cation). All other surface forcing and boundary conditions were kept
0.03 as in the modern winds experiment. ROMS/PISCES was run with
(
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
19
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
phytoplankton is modeled by two compartments using the size of nitrogen-dependent, that is, constrained by a constant Redfield ratio.
the cells as a criterion. The main difference between them is the Since we are interested in quantifying the horizontal eddy advection
dependence on silicate by diatoms. Thus, NL is the minimum among of positive anomalies of TIN, we discarded the analysis of the nega-
all the limitation terms computed for all nutrients. The second factor tive ones. This procedure allows to associate positive values of hori-
is the specific growth rate (GR in day1), which is a term that gives zontal eddy fluxes with an onshore advection (positive u0 ) of positive
the combined influence of the physics on phytoplankton growth (the anomalies of TIN, and negative values with an offshore advection
term in brackets in Equation 1). (negative u0 ) of positive anomalies of TIN. In other words, we do not
leppley is the temperature-dependent maximum growth rate include the effect of an onshore flow of negative anomalies of TIN
(in day1). The term in parenthesis is a nondimensional factor which would result in a negative horizontal eddy flux. A more
which gives the combined influence of light (PAR) as well as the detailed inspection shows that this effect is much smaller than the
chlorophyll-to-carbon ratio, where a is the initial slope of the offshore advection of positive TIN anomalies and its removal does
photosynthesis-irradiance curve. not change our conclusions.
Pennington et al. (2006) defined the boundaries of the Peruvian
biogeochemical province as a coastal zone whose width is, approxi-
2.6 | Residence time
mately, of 250 km ranging from 4°S to 15°S. We estimated the
annual mean phytoplankton abundance between the simulated dia- We computed the theoretical Residence Time (hereafter RT) as the
toms and nanophytoplankton concentrations within these latitudes product of the layer depth scale and the habitat width, divided by
over the 200 km-wide nearshore area (extent of the productive the offshore volume transport. Here, the layer depth scale is given
zone). The large phytoplankton cells, that is, diatoms, represent by the latitude-dependant surface Ekman layer depth (dEkman) using a
almost 70% of the total phytoplankton community in our simula- coastal domain averaged eddy viscosity (parameterized as function
tions. This group is known to be dominant nearshore in Peruvian of the wind speed). The habitat width is determined by the first
waters (Iriarte & Gonzalez, 2004). This finding serves to weight the baroclinic Rossby radius of deformation (kRossby) extracted from
vertically averaged variables involved in the analyses (e.g., the limita- Chelton, Deszoeke, Schlax, El Naggar, and Siwertz (1998), and the
tions terms), related with both diatoms and nanophytoplankton. This offshore volume transport is estimated by the wind-driven cross-
is done in order to represent both phytoplankton types as an aver- shore Ekman transport (Mx). Hence, RT is the time required to
aged response of the phytoplankton community in the coastal area. entirely replace the volume of the upwelled water which travels a
The analyses (latitudinal distributions) were performed over the distance of one Rossby radius of deformation offshore.
300 km-wide nearshore band from 5°S to 17°S. This latitudinal
kRossby dEkman
range was chosen following three criteria, namely, (i) to be away RT ¼ (2)
Mx
from the model boundaries, (ii) to focus on the most productive
region of the Peruvian biogeochemical province and (ii) to consider
only the latitudinal band in which the temporal quantitative analysis 3 | RESULTS
of the strengthening of the winds was performed (Section Wind
Intensification). The annual mean PP was vertically integrated within 3.1 | Effect of the induced wind trend on biological
the euphotic zone (ZEU), which is defined as the downward light production
penetration depth of 1% of the surface value of PAR. PP is the total
sum of the production associated to nano and diatoms. The NL and Figure 3 shows the annual mean latitudinal distribution of PP and
GR factors were both averaged in relation to their weights of phyto- the limitation factors (NL and GR). Blue continuous lines are the
plankton abundance and vertically averaged within the ZEU. results associated to the modern winds experiment while the red
dotted lines are the results for the increased winds experiment. The
percentage variations between both experiments are shown on the
2.5 | Eddy fluxes of nutrients right panel. On average, intensified winds induce more nutrient sup-
In order to quantify the eddy-driven leaking of the coastal inventory ply and an increase in PP, as seen in Figure 3a. This effect, however,
of nutrients, we performed a Reynolds decomposition of the hori- is not uniform in the coastal upwelling zone. An equatorward trend
zontal advection term, where the flux is decomposed into a mean of PP intensification of, approximately, 2% per latitudinal degree, is
and a time-varying (eddy)–induced flux, following the methodology found starting from Chimbote. The maximum relative PP increase of,
of Gruber et al. (2011). The eddy-induced horizontal flux is u0 :TIN0 , approximately, 15% occurs at southern Callao and southern San
where TIN 0
is the time-varying total inorganic nitrogen (in Juan. In general, PP is increased by, approximately, only
2 1
mmol N m3) and u0 is the time-varying cross-shore component of 5 mol C m year .
the velocity (in m/s). Both anomalies were calculated relative to the While PP increases in the whole domain in response to increased
annual mean. Only TIN (the sum of nitrate and ammonium) was winds, two important regions experience a decrease in PP, which is
considered in this analysis because the nitrogen pool undergoes evidenced by a negative relative percentage variation of around
nitrogen fixation and denitrification. In contrast, phosphate is 3%, as seen in Figure 3b. Note that another minimum occurs at
6 | MOGOLLON AND R CALIL
southern Chimbote, where the relative percentage variation is zero. coast, the lower NL values may result from an increased eddy-driven
We investigate in detail the response of these counterintuitive zones export of nutrients rather than a lack of nutrients. Next, we explore
in order to understand their resilience to increased upwelling-favor- this possibility.
able winds and assess their overall importance in the behavior of this Under increased winds GR decreases, on average, 15% (see Fig-
important EBUS to climate change. ure 3e,f). The maximum GR is found within the counterintuitive
As seen in Figure 3c,d, NL increases, on average, 10% within the zones, but since we demonstrated that these key regions exhibit rel-
domain (as NL increases, it yields a lower nutrient limitation status). ative strong NL status, GR is ultimately controlled by temperature
The maximum relative increase of around 20% occurs in the north- (limNL?0 GR f(T)).
ernmost area and between Pisco–Callao. Note that the regions that The dependence of the Eppley relation (Equation 1) on tempera-
exhibit a counterintuitive response have the lowest NL values, mean- ture explains the negative variation in GR. Enhanced upwelling sup-
ing that phytoplankton growth is more limited by the availability of plies colder waters to the surface. Modeled temperature (averaged
nutrients in these areas than the rest of the domain. However, since over the ZEU) decreases 5% (about 0.85°C) under the increased
these regions are important upwelling centers along the Peruvian winds scenario. The correlation coefficient between temperature and
(a) (b)
50
15
Primary production
PP (mol C/m2/year )
% Relative variation
40 10 Counterintuitive
zones
5
30
0
20 modern increased
–5
–17 –16 –15 –14 –13 –12 –11 –10 –9 –8 –7 –6 –5 –17 –16 –15 –14 –13 –12 –11 –10 –9 –8 –7 –6 –5
(c) (d)
0.8
20
Nutrient limitation
% Relative variation
factor Counterintuitive
15
0.6 zones
NL
10
0.4 5
modern increased
0
–17 –16 –15 –14 –13 –12 –11 –10 –9 –8 –7 –6 –5 –17 –16 –15 –14 –13 –12 –11 –10 –9 –8 –7 –6 –5
(e) (f)
0
Counterintuitive zones
0.5 modern increased
% Relative variation
–10
GR (day –1)
0.4
0.3 –20
Specific growth
rate San Pisco Callao Chimbote Pta. Falsa
0.2 –30 Juan
–17 –16 –15 –14 –13 –12 –11 –10 –9 –8 –7 –6 –5 –17 –16 –15 –14 –13 –12 –11 –10 –9 –8 –7 –6 –5
Latitude Latitude
F I G U R E 3 Annual means latitudinal distributions of: (a) Primary production (PP) vertically integrated within ZEU. (c) Nutrient limitation (NL)
term vertically averaged within ZEU (e) Specific growth rate (GR) vertically averaged within ZEU. Panels b, d and f, are the percentage relative
variation of PP, NL and GR between modern (blue line) and increased (red dotted line) winds experiments, respectively. All the quantities were
averaged within the first 300 km nearshore band. Red dashed circles depict the counterintuitive zones
MOGOLLON AND R CALIL | 7
PP for the modern winds experiment is 0.73, while for increased important upwelling centers. Positive horizontal eddy fluxes are
winds it is 0.83. The simulated GR beyond our latitudinal limits of found over the shelf at Chiclayo (7°S) and Chimbote (9.4°S). How-
analysis showed larger rates near the Equator and southern San Juan ever, negative horizontal eddy fluxes are found from 70 km from the
(not shown). This is due to an interplay between warmer waters and coast in the upper 50 m for Chimbote. This demonstrates that an
well lit areas, rather than the temperature-dependent shift that offshore export of nitrogen (in the form of nitrate + ammonium) is
occurs along the Peruvian coast under the increased winds scenario. occurring, removing inorganic nutrients at a rate of
0.35 mmol N m2 s1. Callao and Pisco exhibit a similar pattern
with export rates of 0.20 and 0.25 mmol N m2 s1, respec-
3.2 | Eddy-driven effects on primary production
tively. We can now relate the level of mesoscale activity (red line in
If we assume that nutrient availability and nutrient use efficiency Figure 4a) with the four panels in Figure 4b. The lowest EKE values
(i.e., NL and GR) are equally important in controlling PP, we obtain a are found in the northern domain, where positive eddy-induced
5% deficit (since GR decreases 15% and NL increases 10%) that may fluxes of TIN are found. The largest EKE peak occurs between Chim-
be attributed to other physical factors under the increased winds bote and Callao at the central domain of analysis, where high rates
scenario. These factors negatively influence PP in the NHCS. This is of negative eddy-induced flux of TIN are found. In spite of Pisco
because the strengthening of the winds may also induce other non- having low EKE values, when compared to the whole coastal
linear effects on primary production, arising as by-products of the domain, it exhibits a nutrient-leaking pattern similar to Chimbote or
induced trend. In order to assess this influence and understand the Callao. This response could be associated with other eddy-driven
latitudinal variability of PP (see Figure S2), we focus in two mecha- factors, such as the change in orientation of the Peruvian coastline,
nisms. The first is the eddy-induced horizontal advection of nutrients bathymetric features or wind mixing energy production. The latter is
and the second is the local effect of wind mixing, as it induces a tur- assessed in the next section.
bulent habitat and deepens the mixed layer impacting PP.
(a) (b)
w3 EKE RT MLD
Chiclayo 7°S
Chimbote 9.4°S
0 0
–50 –50
Depth (m)
–16 –100 –100
35 250 25
–18 –150 –150
Depth (m)
5 –30
–17 –16 –15 –14 –13 –12 –11 –10 –9 –8 –7 –6 –5
–100 –100
Latitude
–150 –150
–200 –200
200 150 100 50 200 150 100 50
Distance (km) Distance (km)
F I G U R E 4 (a) Annual mean latitudinal distribution of residence time (RT: blue dash-dotted line), wind mixing index (w3: black dotted line),
eddy kinetic energy (EKE: red continuous line) and mixed layer depth (MLD: green dashed line). (b) Cross-shore vertical sections of the
horizontal eddy-induced fluxes of total inorganic nitrogen (TIN) [mmol N m2 s1] at four different locations, as indicated. Positive (negative)
values mean eddy-induced onshore (offshore) advection of positive TIN anomalies
production rates. The key to understand the inverse relationship these features on the overall biogeochemistry of this EBUS deserves
between wind-driven mixing and PP, relies on the efficiency of nutri- further attention and should be addressed in a future study. Further-
ent recycling and the effective retainment within the productive more, as the largest w3 index is found at 14°S, the cluster released
upper layers. The lack of exposure to intense turbulent mixing would at this latitude exhibits a different vertical pattern, in which a sub-
be beneficial to primary producers in the NHCS. To have an insight stantial amount of offshore downwelling occurs, as evidenced by a
on these two mechanisms, which were initially proposed by Bakun sharply deepening of the trajectory in the southern drifters during
and Weeks (2008), we estimated the theoretical residence time the end of the month. This is in agreement with Gruber et al.
along the Peruvian coast (see Section Residence Time). Longer resi- (2011), who suggested that eddy-induced subduction and offshore
dence times are usually associated with lower turbulent activity, transport remove inorganic and organic nutrients from the nearshore
hence, we may use the residence time as a proxy of these two and potentially enrich the offshore region. Accordingly, there exists a
mechanisms at work. latitudinal trend in which the eddy-induced subduction effect weak-
Figure 4a shows the annual mean latitudinal distribution of RT in ens equatoward. As a consequence, the northern domain is less
days (blue dashed line). RT and w3 are inversely correlated (0.9). impacted by this mechanism when compared to the southern
The larger the wind mixing, the shorter the residence time. This domain. This helps to explain the latitudinal variability of PP (see Fig-
explains the higher PP rates in the northern portion of the domain, ure S2). The width of the shelf, which may be another factor that
as opposed to lower values in the central or southern domain (see impacts particle residence times and, hence, biological production,
Figure S2), where the counterintuitive zones are located. remains unexplored. However, based on our results, we speculate
A Lagrangian experiment helps illustrate how the mechanism that a wider continental shelf would lead to longer residence times,
works. It consisted in the deployment of four clusters of floats at thus favoring primary production.
four fixed locations and released at 55 m depth (average depth of
the coastal upwelling) within the productive coastal area during
3.5 | Temporal variability
August (stronger winds during austral winter). This parallel experi-
ment is detailed in the Supporting Information section The temporal variability for all variables previously discussed is sum-
(Appendix S5). The residence times of the modeled drifters agree marized in Figure 5a,b, where results are shown as monthly aver-
remarkably well with the theoretical one, although the latter repre- aged time series for the modern winds experiment. We decided not
sents the annual mean. Results show that the central portion of the to show the time series for the increased winds experiment because
NHCS is more affected by meso and submesoscale structures, such both solutions exhibit almost the same temporal pattern with some
as filaments, that effectively advect coastal waters into the open slight differences in the amplitude (PP and production terms). How-
ocean, which is evidenced by the scattered pattern in the central ever, we detailed these important differences as follows: Under the
NHCS (see Figure S5). Although characterizing the dynamics of the increased winds scenario, PP increases from winter to summer. Dur-
upwelling filaments is beyond the scope of this work, the impact of ing fall and early winter (AMJJ) no significant differences are
MOGOLLON AND R CALIL | 9
observed (only a decay in productivity between 1% and 2% under during late-winter/early-spring (not shown). As a consequence, no
increased winds). During summertime (JFM), PP increases almost significantly temporal variability is related to the well-lit zone. How-
13% (from 31 to 35 mol C m2 year1) under increased winds. A ever, the seasonal cycle of PAR (not shown) follows GR, with a maxi-
yearlong increase of, approximately, 10% of the NL factor is mum value of 260 W/m2 during summer and a minimum value of
obtained in both scenarios. Similarly, the GR is about 15% lower 125 W/m2 during winter.
under increased winds than in the modern winds experiment Our results are in agreement with Echevin et al. (2008), who
throughout the year. demonstrated that the surface chlorophyll concentration is highest
Wind mixing is larger and residence times are shorter during fall in austral summer and decreases during austral winter, in phase
and winter. The EKE is maximum in March, July and November. Our opposition with the coastal upwelling intensity. They demonstrated
results suggest that in the NHCS there exists a coupling between that the seasonal cycle of surface chlorophyll is mainly controlled
the eddy-driven export and wind mixing during late fall and early by the mixed layer depth, which deepens during winter and dilute
winter, that is, June and July, as evidenced in Figure 5b (black the surface chlorophyll concentration by entraining waters from
marked and red continuous lines). In contrast, during the rest of the below the mixed layer. In fact, our simulated mixed layer gets, on
year, they are both negatively correlated. This could partially explain average, 18% deeper along the year under the increased winds sce-
the so-called “Peruvian paradox” (Echevin, Aumont, Ledesma, & nario (not shown). Thus, we suggest that the global warming-
Flores, 2008; Pennington et al., 2006), which consists in an offset induced strengthening of the upwelling-favorable winds will ulti-
between the stronger upwelling period (austral winter) with the mately lead to a deepening of the mixed layer with strong impact
lower rates of primary production. This opposite relationship is clear on biogeochemical processes, such as entrainment/recycling rates
when we compare the time series of PP and w3 (from Figure 5a,b, of nutrients. This deepening would mitigate the effects of the
respectively). During winter, the NL status decreases (higher NL val- acceleration of the upwelling circulation by preventing abrupt
ues) due to larger nutrient concentrations in the euphotic zone. changes in production rates, thus yielding a more resilient biological
However, the enhanced coastal upwelling also leads to a decrease in response in the NHCS. The absence of the counteractive mecha-
the nutrient use efficiency partially due to a cooler environment nisms would probably result in a proportional increase in primary
(lower GR rates). Thus, the combined opposite effect of these two production to the wind perturbation, as found in other EBUS’s.
production terms partially control the seasonal cycle of PP in the One possible explanation for the resilience of the NHCS is that the
NHCS. In addition, the euphotic layer fluctuates around 40 3 m deepening of the mixed layer buffers an increase in primary pro-
depth, with a maximum depth during summer and a minimum one duction under increased winds.
(a)
0.6 0.6 –10
35 PP NL GR MLD
–15 Mixed layer depth (m)
Growth rate (day –1)
PP (mol C/m2/year)
0.5
Nutrient limitation
0.55
–20
30
0.4
0.5 –25
0.3 25 –30
0.45
–35
0.2
20 0.4 –40
J F M A M J J A S O N D
(b)
35 250 16
Eddy kinetic energy (cm 2 /s 2)
w3 EKE RT
Wind mixing index (m3/s 3)
Residence time (days)
30 14
200
12
25
10
150
20
8
15 100 6
10 4
J F M A M J J A S O N D
Months
F I G U R E 5 Monthly time series of: (a) Primary production, growth rate, nutrient limitation and mixed layer depth for the modern winds
experiment. (b) Residence time, wind mixing index and eddy kinetic energy. The residence time (RT) was averaged within the first 100 km
nearshore band. The rest of the quantities were averaged within the first 300 km nearshore band and between 5°S and 17°S
10 | MOGOLLON AND R CALIL
Program is part of the Global Ocean Observing System. Argo DOI Chelton, D. B., Deszoeke, R. A., Schlax, M. G., El Naggar, K., & Siwertz,
(https://doi.org/10.17882/42182). CCMP Version-2.0 vector wind N. (1998). Geographical variability of the first baroclinic rossby radius
of deformation. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 28(3), 433–460.
analyses are produced by Remote Sensing Systems (www.remss.c
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1998)028<0433:
om). The altimeter products were produced by Ssalto/Duacs and dis- GVOTFB>2.0.CO;2
tributed by Aviso, with support from Cnes. CarbonTracker CT2016 Colas, F., Capet, X., McWilliams, J., & Shchepetkin, A. (2008). 1997–1998
results provided by NOAA ESRL, Boulder, Colorado, USA. El Nin ~o off Peru: A numerical study. Progress in Oceanography, 79(2–
4), 138–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2008.10.015
Da Silva, A., Young, C., & Levitus, S. (1994). Atlas of surface marine data
CONFLICT OF INTEREST 1994, vol. 1, algorithms and procedures, noaa atlas nesdis 6. US
Department of Commerce, NOAA, NESDIS, USA. page 74.
The authors have no conflict of interest. Doney, S. C., Ruckelshaus, M., Duffy, J. E., Barry, J. P., Chan, F., English,
C. A., . . . Talley, L. D. (2012). Climate change impacts on marine
ecosystems. Annual Review of Marine Science, 4(1), 11–37. PMID:
ORCID 22457967. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-041911-111611
Donlon, C. J., Martin, M., Stark, J., Roberts-Jones, J., Fiedler, E., & Wim-
n
Rodrigo Mogollo http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8049-9520 mer, W. (2012). The operational sea surface temperature and sea ice
analysis (ostia) system. Remote Sensing of Environment, 116, 140–158.
Paulo H. R. Calil https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6361-1747
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2010.10.017
Echevin, V., Albert, A., Le vy, M., Graco, M., Aumont, O., Pietri, A., & Gar-
ric, G. (2014). Intraseasonal variability of nearshore productivity in
REFERENCES the northern humboldt current system: The role of coastal trapped
waves. Continental Shelf Research, 73, 14–30. https://doi.org/
Aumont, O., & Bopp, L. (2006). Globalizing results from ocean in situ iron 10.1016/j.csr.2013.11.015
fertilization studies. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 20, GB2017. Echevin, V., Aumont, O., Ledesma, J., & Flores, G. (2008). The seasonal
https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GB002591 cycle of surface chlorophyll in the peruvian upwelling system: A mod-
Aumont, O., Maier-Reimer, E., Blain, S., & Monfray, P. (2003). An ecosys- elling study. Progress in Oceanography, 79(2), 167–176. https://doi.
tem model of the global ocean including Fe, Si, P colimitations. Global org/10.1016/j.pocean.2008.10.026
Biogeochemical Cycles, 17, 1060. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GB Garcia, H., Locarnini, R., Boyer, T., Antonov, J., Baranova, O., Zweng, M.,
001745 . . . Johnson, D. (2014). World ocean atlas 2013, volume 3: Dissolved
Bakun, A. (1990). Global climate change and intensification of coastal oxygen, apparent oxygen utilization, and oxygen saturation. NOAA
ocean upwelling. Science, 247(4939), 198–201. https://doi.org/10. Atlas NESDIS, 75, 27.
1126/science.247.4939.198 Gruber, N., Lachkar, Z., Frenzel, H., Marchesiello, P., Mu €nnich, M., McWil-
Bakun, A., Black, B. A., Bograd, S. J., Garcia-Reyes, M., Miller, A. J., liams, J. C., . . . Plattner, G.-K. (2011). Eddy-induced reduction of bio-
Rykaczewski, R. R., & Sydeman, W. J. (2015). Anticipated effects of logical production in eastern boundary upwelling systems. Nature
climate change on coastal upwelling ecosystems. Current Climate geoscience, 4(11), 787–792. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1273
Change Reports, 1(2), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-015- Gutie rrez, D., Bouloubassi, I., Sifeddine, A., Purca, S., Goubanova, K.,
0008-4 Graco, M., . . . Salvatteci, R. (2011). Coastal cooling and increased
Bakun, A., Field, D. B., Redondo-Rodriguez, A., & Weeks, S. J. (2010). productivity in the main upwelling zone off peru since the mid-twen-
Greenhouse gas, upwelling favorable winds, and the future of coastal tieth century. Geophysical Research Letters, 38, L07603. https://doi.
ocean upwelling ecosystems. Global Change Biology, 16(4), 1213– org/10.1029/2010GL046324
1228. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02094.x Iriarte, J. L., & Gonzalez, H. E. (2004). Phytoplankton size structure during
Bakun, A., & Weeks, S. J. (2008). The marine ecosystem off peru: What and after the 1997/98 el nin ~o in a coastal upwelling area of the
are the secrets of its fishery productivity and what might its future northern humboldt current system. Marine ecology progress series,
hold? Progress in Oceanography, 79(2), 290–299. https://doi.org/10. 269, 83–90. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps269083
1016/j.pocean.2008.10.027 Key, R. M., Lauvset, S. K., & Pe rez, F. F. (2016). The global ocean data
Balmaseda, M. A., Vidard, A., & Anderson, D. L. (2008). The ecmwf ocean analysis project version 2 (glodapv2)-an internally consistent data
analysis system: Ora-s3. Monthly Weather Review, 136(8), 3018–3034. product for the world ocean. Earth System Science Data, 8(2), 297.
https://doi.org/10.1175/2008MWR2433.1 Kubota, M., Iwasaka, N., Kizu, S., Konda, M., & Kutsuwada, K. (2002).
Barnier, B., Siefridt, L., & Marchesiello, P. (1995). Thermal forcing for a Japanese ocean flux data sets with use of remote sensing observa-
global ocean circulation model using a three-year climatology of tions (j-ofuro). Journal of Oceanography, 58(1), 213–225. https://doi.
ecmwf analyses. Journal of Marine Systems, 6(4), 363–380. https:// org/10.1023/A:1015845321836
doi.org/10.1016/0924-7963(94)00034-9 Lachkar, Z., & Gruber, N. (2013). Response of biological production and
Behrenfeld, M. J., O’Malley, R. T., Siegel, D. A., McClain, C. R., Sarmiento, air–sea co2 fluxes to upwelling intensification in the california and
J. L., Feldman, G. C., . . . Boss, E. S. (2006). Climate-driven trends in canary current systems. Journal of Marine Systems, 109, 149–160.
contemporary ocean productivity. Nature, 444(7120), 752. https:// https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2012.04.003
doi.org/10.1038/nature05317 Lauvset, S. K., Key, R. M., & Perez, F. F. (2016). A new global interior
Bosilovich, M. G., Akella, S., Coy, L., Cullather, R., Draper, C., Gelaro, R., ocean mapped climatology: The 1x1 glodap version 2. Earth System
. . . Suarez, M. (2015). Merra-2: Initial evaluation of the climate. Series Science Data, 8(2), 325.
on Global Modeling and Data Assimilation, NASA/TM, 104606. Liu, W. T., Tang, W., & Polito, P. S. (1998). Nasa scatterometer provides
Brochier, T., Echevin, V., Tam, J., Chaigneau, A., Goubanova, K., & Ber- global ocean-surface wind fields with more structures than numerical
trand, A. (2013). Climate change scenarios experiments predict a weather prediction. Geophysical Research Letters, 25(6), 761–764.
future reduction in small pelagic fish recruitment in the humboldt https://doi.org/10.1029/98GL00544
current system. Global change biology, 19(6), 1841–1853. https://doi. Marchesiello, P., McWilliams, J. C., & Shchepetkin, A. (2003). Equilibrium
org/10.1111/gcb.12184 structure and dynamics of the california current system. Journal of
12 | MOGOLLON AND R CALIL
Physical Oceanography, 33(4), 753–783. https://doi.org/10.1175/ Stocker, T. (2014). Climate change 2013: the physical science basis:
1520-0485(2003)33<753:ESADOT>2.0.CO;2 Working Group I contribution to the Fifth assessment report of the
Mogollo n, R., & Calil, P. H. R. (2017). On the effects of ENSO on ocean Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University
biogeochemistry in the Northern Humboldt Current System (NHCS): Press.
A modeling study. Journal of Marine Systems, 172, 137–159. https:// Storto, A., Masina, S., & Navarra, A. (2016). Evaluation of the cmcc eddy-
doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2017.03.011 permitting global ocean physical reanalysis system (c-glors, 1982–
Montes, I., Schneider, W., Colas, F., Blanke, B., & Echevin, V. (2011). 2012) and its assimilation components. Quarterly Journal of the Royal
Subsurface connections in the eastern tropical Pacific during La Meteorological Society, 142(695), 738–758. https://doi.org/10.1002/
Nin~a 1999–2001 and El Nin ~o 2002–2003. Journal of Geophysical qj.2673
Research, 116(C12), C12022. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JC0 Strub, P. T., Combes, V., Shillington, F. A., & Pizarro, O. (2013). Currents
07624 and processes along the eastern boundaries. Ocean Circulation and
Narayan, N., Paul, A., Mulitza, S., & Schulz, M. (2010). Trends in coastal Climate: A 21st Century Perspective. pp. 339–384.
upwelling intensity during the late 20th century. Ocean Science, 6(3), Strub, P. T., & Mesıas, J. M. (1998). Coastal ocean circulation off western
815. https://doi.org/10.5194/os-6-815-2010 South America. In A. R. Robinson, & K. H. Brink (Eds.), The sea (Vol.
Niiler, P. (1977) One-dimensional models of the upper ocean, modelling 11, pp. 273–313). NewYork: John Wiley.
and prediction of the upper layers of the ocean. EB Kraus. pp. 143– Sydeman, W., Garcıa-Reyes, M., Schoeman, D., Rykaczewski, R., Thomp-
172. son, S., Black, B., & Bograd, S. (2014). Climate change and wind
Pennington, J. T., Mahoney, K. L., Kuwahara, V. S., Kolber, D. D., intensification in coastal upwelling ecosystems. Science, 345(6192),
Calienes, R., & Chavez, F. P. (2006). Primary production in the east- 77–80. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1251635
ern tropical pacific: A review. Progress in Oceanography, 69(2), 285– Tegen, I., & Fung, I. (1995). Contribution to the atmospheric mineral
317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2006.03.012 aerosol load from land surface modification. Journal of Geophysical
Peters, W., Jacobson, A. R., Sweeney, C., Andrews, A. E., Conway, T. J., Research: Atmospheres, 100(D9), 18707–18726. https://doi.org/10.
Masarie, K., . . . Worthy, D. E. (2007). An atmospheric perspective on 1029/95JD02051
north american carbon dioxide exchange: Carbontracker. Proceedings View-CO, G. (1979). Cooperative global atmospheric data integration
of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(48), 18925–18930. https:// project, updated annually. Multi-laboratory compilation of synchro-
doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0708986104 nized and gap-filled atmospheric carbon dioxide records for the per-
Risien, C. M., & Chelton, D. B. (2008). A global climatology of surface iod, 2012:2013.
wind and wind stress fields from eight years of quikscat scatterome- Weatherall, P., Marks, K., Jakobsson, M., Schmitt, T., Tani, S., Arndt, J. E.,
ter data. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 38(11), 2379–2413. . . . Wigley, R. (2015). A new digital bathymetric model of the world’s
https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JPO3881.1 oceans. Earth and Space Science, 2(8), 331–345. https://doi.org/10.
Rykaczewski, R. R., & Dunne, J. P. (2010). Enhanced nutrient supply to 1002/2015EA000107
the california current ecosystem with global warming and increased Wentz, F., Scott, J., Hoffman, R., Leidner, M., Atlas, R., & Ardizzone, J.
stratification in an earth system model. Geophysical Research Letters, (2015). Remote sensing systems cross-calibrated multi-platform
37, L21606. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL045019 (ccmp) 6-hourly ocean vector wind analysis product on 0.25 deg grid,
Salvatteci, R., Field, D., Gutie rrez, D., Baumgartner, T., Ferreira, V., version 2.0. Remote Sensing Systems, Santa Rosa, CA Google Scho-
Ortlieb, L., . . . Bertrand, A. (2018). Multifarious anchovy and sardine lar.
regimes in the humboldt current system during the last 150 years. Zweng, M., Reagan, J., Antonov, J., Locarnini, R., Mishonov, A., Boyer, T.,
Global Change Biology, 24(3), 1055–1068. https://doi.org/10.1111/ & Biddle, M. M. (2013). World ocean atlas 2013, noaa atlas nesdis
gcb.13991 74 vol. 2: Salinity. NOAA.
Sanchez, G., Calienes, R., & Zuta, S. (2000). The 1997-98 el nin ~o and its
effects on the coastal marine ecosystem off peru. Reports of Califor-
nia Cooperative Oceanic Fisheries Investigations, 41, 62–86.
Sarmiento, J. L., Slater, R., Barber, R., Bopp, L., Doney, S. C., Hirst, A., . . . SUPPORTING INFORMATION
Soldatov, V. (2004). Response of ocean ecosystems to climate warm-
Additional supporting information may be found online in the
ing. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 18, GB3003. https://doi.org/10.
1029/2003GB002134 Supporting Information section at the end of the article.
Shchepetkin, A. F., & McWilliams, J. C. (2005). The regional oceanic mod-
eling system (ROMS): A split-explicit, free-surface, topography-follow-
ing-coordinate oceanic model. Ocean Modelling, 9(4), 347–404.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2004.08.002 n R, R Calil PH.
How to cite this article: Mogollo
Shchepetkin, A. F., & McWilliams, J. C. (2009). Correction and commen- Counterintuitive effects of global warming-induced wind
tary for “Ocean forecasting in terrain-following coordinates: Formula- patterns on primary production in the Northern Humboldt
tion and skill assessment of the regional ocean modeling system” by
Current System. Glob Change Biol. 2018;00:1–12.
Haidvogel et al., J. Comp. Phys. 227, pp. 3595–3624. Journal of Com-
putational Physics, 228(24), 8985–9000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14171
2009.09.002