This document contains the answers to three questions from a management quiz. In the first answer, the student explains that job satisfaction is an outcome variable in organizational behavior models, which is influenced by inputs and processing. The second answer argues that behavior cannot be predicted without formally studying organizational behavior, as individual and group factors impact behavior. The third answer discusses uncertainty avoidance as a dimension of organizational culture, noting that high uncertainty avoidance leads to more rigid structures while low avoidance allows more flexibility and innovation.
This document contains the answers to three questions from a management quiz. In the first answer, the student explains that job satisfaction is an outcome variable in organizational behavior models, which is influenced by inputs and processing. The second answer argues that behavior cannot be predicted without formally studying organizational behavior, as individual and group factors impact behavior. The third answer discusses uncertainty avoidance as a dimension of organizational culture, noting that high uncertainty avoidance leads to more rigid structures while low avoidance allows more flexibility and innovation.
This document contains the answers to three questions from a management quiz. In the first answer, the student explains that job satisfaction is an outcome variable in organizational behavior models, which is influenced by inputs and processing. The second answer argues that behavior cannot be predicted without formally studying organizational behavior, as individual and group factors impact behavior. The third answer discusses uncertainty avoidance as a dimension of organizational culture, noting that high uncertainty avoidance leads to more rigid structures while low avoidance allows more flexibility and innovation.
Job satisfaction isn’t a behavior but a noteworthy individual outcome of OB model. It is a dependent variable because the outcome is an integrated function of what we are putting as input as well as the certain process which ultimately lead us to the anticipated outcome which varies from person to person. As the OB model consists of 3 different level of input, processing and output and additionally there is another variable for the assessment of output for us to redesign the input and processing if the outcome is somehow negative, is called the feedback. For example, if the outcome of job satisfaction shows that, Mr. Karim as an individual isn’t much satisfied with his job, therefore to accomplish the desired satisfaction, he as an individual should revise his input and outputs to reach that desired level of satisfaction, like changing his personality or job performance as a part of input, after that assisting to motivate himself in some other way or altering his decision- making strategies as a part of the process. To conclude, as the outcomes like job satisfaction are the key variables that we want to predict, and are affected by some input and the process, explaining this dependent factor of OB model assists us to our desired final needs, because any undesired outcomes can influence inputs and processes in the future.
Answer to the question no 2.
The statement that behavior is predictable and we are not required to formally study OB, isn’t what I agree with. The reasons are explained below- Organizational behavior is the field of study that systematically studies the impact that an individual, group and organizational structure have on the behavior within the organization. As we know that, individual needs, wants, demands differ from each other, additionally, as individuals we all vary in terms of our own psychology, how we behave within a group, our activities, political position within the organization ect. OB being a multi-disciplinary subject emphasizes on each of these factors through the contribution of sociology, psychology, anthropology and so on. So, without formally studying OB, it is quite dogmatic to evaluate the behavior and its impact within an organization. As the individual behavior affect the overall performance of an organization, its productivity, profitability as well as survival, having systematic knowledge which is scientifically tested and proved is inevitable, which leads us to OB. The theories of OB are analytically built and are used to predict, understand and control the behavior within the organization to achieve the highest level of organizational effectiveness.
Answer to the question no 3.
Uncertainty avoidance is one of the major dimensions of both Hofstede’s cultural model and GLOBE framework which successfully guide us through assessing an unfamiliar culture. Uncertainty avoidance within an organization refers to the degree to which an organization feels threatened by ambiguous and uncertain situations and tries to sidestep them. It can be either high or low in terms of its intensity. For example: X organization is highly concerned with avoiding their uncertainty, it illustrates that the employees of X organization have an increased level of anxiety round the clock, the structure of X organization is strictly rigid as they always focus on certain rules and regulations as well as hierarchy to avoid their uncertain situation. As a result, the organization has very less amount of innovative approaches and freedom. On the contrary, Z organization has a low uncertainty avoidance culture within the organization which in turns results a positive attitude among their employees as they always embrace any new situations whether its positive or negative. The employees of Z organizations are more accepting of ambiguity, operating in a decentralized culture with more flexibility and liberty. As they are less shackled by the situational crisis, they tend to be highly innovative and open-minded.