Professional Documents
Culture Documents
the Organic Act for the Cordillera Autonomous Region (RA 6766, 1989). The
decrees that have been passed, failed to encompass all the needs of the
indigenous people primarily because of failure in implementation and sole
focus on the land and domains only.
Because of this, a more comprehensive law is needed that "seek to stop
prejudice against indigenous people through recognition of certain rights over
their ancestral lands, to live in accordance, recognize and protect the rights of
the indigenous people not only to their ancestral domain but to social justice
and human rights, self-determination and empowerment, and their cultural
integrity," This then gave birth to movements for a comprehensive law that will
protect not only the lands, but human rights of the indigenous Filipino people.
CIPRAD or the Coalition for Indigenous People's Rights and Ancestral
Domains is an alliance of Indigenous People's Organizations (IPO’s) and
nongovernment organizations (NGO’s) created to pursue the advocacy for IP
rights and ancestral domains. The Coalition is participated by IPOs in the
Cordillera, Region I, Nueva Vizcaya, Cagayan, Caraballo, Sierra Madre, Quezon,
Aurora, Quirino, Nueva Ecija, Zambales, Pampanga, Bulacan, Mindoro
Occidental, Palawan, Panay, Davao, Cagayan, Cotabato and Zamboanga.
CIPRAD partnered with various NGOs organizations such as Episcopal
Commission on Indigenous Peoples, National Peace Conference, Center for
Living Heritage and PANLIPI (Legal Assistance Center for Indigenous Filipinos) in
order to lobby for the IPRA or Indigenous People's Rights Act.
IPRA, formerly known as Ancestral Domain Bill, was first filed in the
Congress sometime in 1987 under the Senate Bill No. 909 authored by Senator
Santanina Rasul, Senator Joseph Estrada and Senator Alberto Romulo, during
the 8th Congress, but was never enacted in to law. In the 9th Congress, Senator
Rasul introduced Senate Bill No. 1029 and Senator Macapagal-Arroyo
introduced Senate Bill No. 1849. However, the bill was never sponsored and
deliberated upon in the floor.
Despite these failed efforts, the IPOs decided to give it another try.
Decisions have been made during social negotiations among NGOs and POs to
rename the bill from Ancestral Domain Bill to Indigenous Peoples Rights Act to
emphasize the holistic approach and character of the bill. A consensus was
made on December 1995 between IP representatives and NGO
representatives. Seven non-negotiable points of the bill that were promoted are
the following: a) recognition of native title and rights of IPs to ancestral
domains, b) respect for the right to cultural integrity, c) recognition of
indigenous peoples’ political structures and governance, d) delivery of basic
to the majority's world view, but which the IPRA law attempts to recognize and
interface with the national legal system.
The 1997 IPRA Law defines ancestral domains as "areas generally
belonging to ICCs/IPs comprising lands, inland waters, coastal areas, and
natural resources held under a claim of ownership, occupied or possessed by
ICCs/IPs, by themselves or through their ancestors, communally or individually
since time immemorial, continuously to the present time even when
interrupted by war, force majeure or displacement by force, deceit, stealth or
as a consequence of government projects or any other voluntary dealings
entered into by government and private individuals or corporations, and which
are necessary to ensure their economic, social and cultural welfare. It shall
include forests, pastures, residential, agricultural and other lands individually
owned whether alienable and disposable otherwise, hunting grounds, burial
grounds, worship areas, bodies of water, mineral and other natural resources
and lands which may no longer be exclusively occupied by ICCs/IPs but from
which they traditionally had access to for their subsistence and traditional
activities, particularly the home ranges of ICCs and IPs who are still nomadic
and or shifting cultivators."
Ancestral domains include the spiritual and cultural bonds to the areas
which the ICCs/IPs possess, occupy and use and to which they have claims of
ownership (inherited from ancestors). This generally refers to areas which they
have possessed at a period of time when as far back as memory can go. Proofs
of time immemorial possession main may include testimony of elders, historical
accounts, anthropological or ethnographic studies, names of places, using
dialect or language of indigenous peoples, genealogy, treaties or pacts,
between or among indigenous peoples and or other populations
Ancestral lands, as stated in the law, refer to "lands occupied, possessed
and utilized by individuals, families and clans who are members of the ICCs/IPs
since time immemorial, by themselves or through their predecessors-
ininterest, under claims of individual or traditional group ownership,
continuously, to the present even when interrupted by war, force majeure or
displacement by force, deceit, stealth or as a consequence of government
projects, and other voluntary dealings entered into by government and private
individuals/corporations, including, but not limited to residential lots, rice
terraces or paddies, private forests, swidden farms and tree lots."
Ancestral land owners are given the right to transfer these ancestral
lands and the right to redeem ancestral lands lost through vitiated consent. It
is different with ancestral domains in a sense that it specifically refers to the
land while the domain may include land, water, and aerial territories.
REPUBLIC ACT NO. 8371
4
THE INDIGENOUS PEOPLE RIGHTS ACT OF 1997
SECTION 1. Short Title. — This Act shall be known as “The Indigenous Peoples’
Rights Act of 1997”.
SECTION 3. Definition of Terms. — For purposes of this Act, the following terms
shall mean:
a) Ancestral Domains — Subject to Section 56 hereof, refer to all
areas generally belonging to ICCs/IPs comprising lands, inland waters, coastal
areas, and natural resources therein, held under a claim of ownership,
occupied or possessed by ICCs/IPs, by themselves or through their ancestors,
communally or individually since time immemorial, continuously to the present
except when interrupted by war, force majeure or displacement by force,
deceit, stealth or as a consequence of government projects or any other
voluntary dealings entered into by government and private
individuals/corporations, and which are necessary to ensure their economic,
social and cultural welfare. It shall include ancestral lands, forests, pasture,
residential, agricultural, and other lands individually owned whether alienable
and disposable or otherwise, hunting grounds, burial grounds, worship areas,
bodies of water, mineral and other natural resources, and lands which may no
longer be exclusively occupied by ICCs/IPs but from which they traditionally
had access to for their subsistence and traditional activities, particularly the
home ranges of ICCs/IPs who are still nomadic and/or shifting cultivators;
b) Ancestral Lands — Subject to Section 56 hereof, refers to land
occupied, possessed and utilized by individuals, families and clans who are
members of the ICCs/IPs since time immemorial, by themselves or through
their predecessors-in-interest, under claims of individual or traditional group
ownership, continuously, to the present except when interrupted by war, force
majeure or displacement by force, deceit, stealth, or as a consequence of
government projects and other voluntary dealings entered into by government
and private individuals/corporations, including, but not limited to, residential
lots, rice terraces or paddies, private forests, swidden farms and tree lots;
bonds to the areas which the ICCs/IPs possess, occupy and use and to which
they have claims of ownership.
SECTION 14. Support for Autonomous Regions. — The State shall continue to
strengthen and support the autonomous regions created under the
Constitution as they may require or need. The State shall likewise encourage
other ICCs/IPs not included or outside Muslim Mindanao and the Cordilleras to
use the form and content of their ways of life as may be compatible with the
fundamental rights defined in the Constitution of the Republic of the
Philippines and other internationally recognized human rights.
SECTION 15. Justice System, Conflict Resolution Institutions, and Peace Building
Processes. — The ICCs/IPs shall have the right to use their own commonly
accepted justice systems, conflict resolution institutions, peace building
processes or mechanisms and other customary laws and practices within their
SECTION 16. Right to Participate in Decision Making. — ICCs/IPs have the right
to participate fully, if they so choose, at all levels of decision-making in matters
which may affect their rights, lives and destinies through procedures
determined by them as well as to maintain and develop their own indigenous
political structures. Consequently, the State shall ensure that the ICCs/IPs shall
be given mandatory representation in policy-making bodies and other local
legislative councils.
SECTION 17. Right to Determine and Decide Priorities for Development. — The
ICCs/IPs shall have the right to determine and decide their own priorities for
development affecting their lives, beliefs, institutions, spiritual well-being, and
the lands they own, occupy or use. They shall participate in the formulation,
implementation and evaluation of policies, plans and programs for national,
regional and local development which may directly affect them.
SECTION 19. Role of Peoples Organizations. — The State shall recognize and
respect the role of independent ICCs/IPs organizations to enable the ICCs/IPs to
pursue and protect their legitimate and collective interests and aspirations
through peaceful and lawful means.
SECTION 23. Freedom from Discrimination and Right to Equal Opportunity and
Treatment. — It shall be the right of the ICCs/IPs to be free from any form of
discrimination, with respect to recruitment and conditions of employment,
such that they may enjoy equal opportunities for admission to employment,
medical and social assistance, safety as well as other occupationally related
benefits, informed of their rights under existing labor legislation and of means
available to them for redress, not subject to any coercive recruitment systems,
including bonded labor and other forms of debt servitude; and equal treatment
in employment for men and women, including the protection from sexual
harassment. Towards this end, the State shall, within the framework of
national laws and regulations, and in cooperation with the ICCs/IPs concerned,
REPUBLIC ACT NO. 8371
14
THE INDIGENOUS PEOPLE RIGHTS ACT OF 1997
adopt special measures to ensure the effective protection with regard to the
recruitment and conditions of employment of persons belonging to these
communities, to the extent that they are not effectively protected by laws
applicable to workers in general. ICCs/IPs shall have the right to association and
freedom for all trade union activities and the right to conclude collective
bargaining agreements with employers’ organizations. They shall likewise have
the right not to be subject to working conditions hazardous to their health,
particularly through exposure to pesticides and other toxic substances.
SECTION 26. Women. — ICC/IP women shall enjoy equal rights and
opportunities with men, as regards the social, economic, political and cultural
spheres of life. The participation of indigenous women in the decision making
process in all levels, as well as in the development of society, shall be given due
respect and recognition. The State shall provide full access to education,
maternal and child care, health and nutrition, and housing services to
indigenous women. Vocational, technical, professional and other forms of
training shall be provided to enable these women to fully participate in all
aspects of social life. As far as possible, the State shall ensure that indigenous
women have access to all services in their own languages.
SECTION 27. Children and Youth. — The State shall recognize the vital role of
the children and youth of ICCs/IPs in nation building and shall promote and
protect their physical, moral, spiritual, intellectual and social well-being.
Towards this end, the State shall support all government programs intended
for the development and rearing of the children and youth of ICCs/IPs for civic
efficiency and establish such mechanisms as may be necessary for the
protection of the rights of the indigenous children and youth.
SECTION 28. Integrated System of Education. — The State shall, through the
NCIP, provide a complete, adequate and integrated system of education,
relevant to the needs of the children and young people of ICCs/IPs.
SECTION 33. Rights to Religious, Cultural Sites and Ceremonies. — ICCs/IPs shall
have the right to manifest, practice, develop, and teach their spiritual and
religious traditions, customs and ceremonies; the right to maintain, protect and
have access to their religious and cultural sites; the right to use and control of
ceremonial objects; and, the right to the repatriation of human remains.
Accordingly, the State shall take effective measures, in cooperation with the
ICCs/IPs concerned, to ensure that indigenous sacred places, including burial
sites, be preserved, respected and protected. To achieve this purpose, it shall
be unlawful to:
a) Explore, excavate or make diggings on archeological sites of the
ICCs/IPs for the purpose of obtaining materials of cultural values without the
free and prior informed consent of the community concerned; and
b) Deface, remove or otherwise destroy artifacts which are of great
importance to the ICCs/IPs for the preservation of their cultural heritage.
SECTION 37. Funds for Archeological and Historical Sites. — The ICCs/IPs shall
have the right to receive from the national government all funds especially
earmarked or allocated for the management and preservation of their
archeological and historical sites and artifacts with the financial and technical
support of the national government agencies.
SECTION 39. Mandate. — The NCIP shall protect and promote the interest and
well-being of the ICCs/IPs with due regard to their beliefs, customs, traditions
and institutions.
SECTION 42. Removal from Office. — Any member of the NCIP may be removed
from office by the President, on his own initiative or upon recommendation by
any indigenous community, before the expiration of his term for cause and
after complying with due process requirement of law.
SECTION 44. Powers and Functions. — To accomplish its mandate, the NCIP
shall have the following powers, jurisdiction and function:
SECTION 46. Offices within the NCIP. — The NCIP shall have the following
offices which shall be responsible for the implementation of the policies
hereinafter provided:
a) Ancestral Domains Office — The Ancestral Domain Office shall be
responsible for the identification, delineation and recognition of ancestral
lands/domains. It shall also be responsible for the management of ancestral
lands/domains in accordance with a master plan as well as the implementation
of the ancestral domain rights of the ICCs/IPs as provided in Chapter III of this
Act. It shall also issue, upon the free and prior informed consent of the ICCs/IPs
concerned, certification prior to the grant of any license, lease or permit for the
exploitation of natural resources affecting the interests of ICCs/IPs or their
ancestral domains and to assist the ICCs/IPs in protecting the territorial
integrity of all ancestral domains. It shall likewise perform such other functions
as the Commission may deem appropriate and necessary;
same are properly and directly enjoyed by them. It shall also be responsible for
such other functions as the NCIP may deem appropriate and necessary;
e) Office of Empowerment and Human Rights — The Office of
Empowerment and Human Rights shall ensure that indigenous socio-political,
cultural and economic rights are respected and recognized. It shall ensure that
capacity building mechanisms are instituted and ICCs/IPs are afforded every
opportunity, if they so choose, to participate in all levels of decision making. It
shall likewise ensure that the basic human rights, and such other rights as the
NCIP may determine, subject to existing laws, rules and regulations, are
protected and promoted;
f) Administrative Office — The Administrative Office shall provide
the NCIP with economical, efficient and effective services pertaining to
personnel, finance, records, equipment, security, supplies and related services.
It shall also administer the Ancestral Domains Fund; and
g) Legal Affairs Office — There shall be a Legal Affairs Office which
shall advice the NCIP on all legal matters concerning ICCs/IPs and which shall
be responsible for providing ICCs/IPs with legal assistance in litigation involving
community interest. It shall conduct preliminary investigation on the basis of
complaints filed by the ICCs/IPs against a natural or juridical person believed to
have violated ICCs/IPs rights. On the basis of its findings, it shall initiate the
filing of appropriate legal or administrative action to the NCIP.
SECTION 47. Other Offices. — The NCIP shall have the power to create
additional offices as it may deem necessary subject to existing rules and
regulations.
SECTION 48. Regional and Field Offices. — Existing regional and field offices
shall remain to function under the strengthened organizational structure of the
NCIP. Other field offices shall be created wherever appropriate and the staffing
pattern thereof shall be determined by the NCIP: Provided, That in provinces
where there are ICCs/IPs but without field offices, the NCIP shall establish field
offices in said provinces.
SECTION 49. Office of the Executive Director. — The NCIP shall create the
Office of the Executive Director which shall serve as its secretariat. The Office
shall be headed by an Executive Director who shall be appointed by the
President of the Republic of the Philippines upon recommendation of the NCIP
SECTION 54. Fraudulent Claims. — The Ancestral Domains Office may, upon
written request from the ICCs/IPs, review existing claims which have been
fraudulently acquired by any person or community. Any claim found to be
fraudulently acquired by, and issued to, any person or community may be
cancelled by the NCIP after due notice and hearing of all parties concerned.
SECTION 56. Existing Property Rights Regimes. — Property rights within the
ancestral domains already existing and/or vested upon effectivity of this Act,
shall be recognized and respected.
SECTION 57. Natural Resources within Ancestral Domains. — The ICCs/IPs shall
have priority rights in the harvesting, extraction, development or exploitation
of any natural resources within the ancestral domains. A non-member of the
ICCs/IPs concerned may be allowed to take part in the development and
utilization of the natural resources for a period of not exceeding twenty-five
(25) years renewable for not more than twenty-five (25) years: Provided, That a
formal and written agreement is entered into with the ICCs/IPs concerned or
that the community, pursuant to its own decision making process, has agreed
to allow such operation: Provided, finally, That the NCIP may exercise visitorial
powers and take appropriate action to safeguard the rights of the ICCs/IPs
under the same contract.
procedure shall ensure that the rights of possessors in good faith shall be
respected: Provided, further, That the action for
cancellation shall be initiated within two (2) years from the effectivity of this
Act: Provided, finally, That the action for reconveyance shall be within a period
of ten (10) years in accordance with existing laws.
SECTION 66. Jurisdiction of the NCIP. — The NCIP, through its regional offices,
shall have jurisdiction over all claims and disputes involving rights of ICCs/IPs:
Provided, however, That no such dispute shall be brought to the NCIP unless
the parties have exhausted all remedies provided under their customary laws.
For this purpose, a certification shall be issued by the Council of Elders/Leaders
who participated in the attempt to settle the dispute that the same has not
been resolved, which certification shall be a condition precedent to the filing of
a petition with the NCIP.
SECTION 67. Appeals to the Court of Appeals. — Decisions of the NCIP shall be
appealable to the Court of Appeals by way of a petition for review.
SECTION 69. Quasi-Judicial Powers of the NCIP. — The NCIP shall have the
power and authority:
REPUBLIC ACT NO. 8371
31
THE INDIGENOUS PEOPLE RIGHTS ACT OF 1997
CHAPTER XI Penalties
SECTION 72. Punishable Acts and Applicable Penalties. — Any person who
commits violation of any of the provisions of this Act, such as, but not limited
to, unauthorized and/or unlawful intrusion upon any ancestral lands or
domains as stated in Sec. 10, Chapter III, or shall commit any of the prohibited
acts mentioned in Sections 21 and 24, Chapter V, Section 33, Chapter VI hereof,
shall be punished in accordance with the customary laws of the ICCs/IPs
concerned: Provided, That no such penalty shall be cruel, degrading or
inhuman punishment: Provided, further, That neither shall the death penalty or
excessive fines be imposed. This provision shall be without prejudice to the
right of any ICCs/IPs to avail of the protection of existing laws. In which case,
any person who violates any provision of this Act shall, upon conviction, be
punished by imprisonment of not less than nine (9) months but not more than
twelve (12) years or a fine of not less than One hundred thousand pesos
(P100,000) nor more than Five hundred thousand pesos (P500,000) or both
such fine and imprisonment upon the discretion of the court. In addition, he
shall be obliged to pay to the ICCs/IPs concerned whatever damage may have
been suffered by the latter as a consequence of the unlawful act.
CHAPTER XII Merger of the Office for Northern Cultural Communities (ONCC)
and the Office for Southern Cultural Communities (OSCC)
SECTION 75. Transition Period. — The ONCC/OSCC shall have a period of six (6)
months from the effectivity of this Act within which to wind up its affairs and to
conduct audit of its finances.
judicious selection and placement of personnel in order that the best qualified
and most deserving persons shall be appointed in the reorganized agency. The
Placement Committee shall be composed of seven (7) commissioners and an
ICCs’/IPs’ representative from each of the first and second level employees
association in the Offices for Northern and Southern Cultural Communities
(ONCC/OSCC), nongovernment organizations (NGOs) who have served the
community for at least five (5) years and peoples organizations (POs) with at
least five (5) years of existence. They shall be guided by the criteria of retention
and appointment to be prepared by the consultative body and by the pertinent
provisions of the civil service law.
SECTION 80. Implementing Rules and Regulations. — Within sixty (60) days
immediately after appointment, the NCIP shall issue the necessary rules and
regulations, in consultation with the Committees on National Cultural
Communities of the House of Representatives and the Senate, for the effective
implementation of this Act.
SECTION 81. Saving Clause. — This Act will not in any manner adversely affect
the rights and benefits of the ICCs/IPs under other conventions,
REPUBLIC ACT NO. 8371
35
THE INDIGENOUS PEOPLE RIGHTS ACT OF 1997
SECTION 82. Separability Clause. — In case any provision of this Act or any
portion thereof is declared unconstitutional by a competent court, other
provisions shall not be affected thereby.
SECTION 83. Repealing Clause. — Presidential Decree No. 410, Executive Order
Nos. 122-B and 122- C, and all other laws, decrees, orders, rules and
regulations or parts thereof inconsistent with this Act are hereby repealed or
modified accordingly.
SECTION 84. Effectivity. — This Act shall take effect fifteen (15) days upon its
publication in the Official Gazette or in any two (2) newspapers of general
circulation.
simple words, the said Act provides Indigenous peoples (IPs) the right to
their ancestral domains and lands.
• Indigenous peoples share distinctive traits that set them apart from the
Filipino mainstream. While the mainstream Filipinos are Christians, the
indigenous people are the non-Christians. Accordingly, the IPs “live in
less accessible, marginal, mostly upland areas. They have a system of
self-government not dependent upon the laws of the central
administration of the Republic of the Philippines. They follow ways of life
and customs that are perceived as different from those of the rest of the
population” (Cruz v. DENR).
• RA No. 8371 provides IPs’ the rights to ancestral domains, which include
the right of ownership, right to develop lands and natural resources,
right to stay in the territories, right in case of displacement (temporary
or permanent resettlement and right to return), right to regulate entry of
migrants, right to safe and clean air and water, right to claim parts of
reservations (except those intended for common public welfare and
service) and the right to resolve conflict. For ancestral lands, in
particular, IPs have the right to transfer land/property rights to/among
members of the same ICCs/IPs and the right to redeem the property in
case of transfers that raise questions on consent given by IPs and
transfers made with unjust considerations and/or prices.
• A CALT or CADT, on the other hand, was granted by the government and
was provided for by law to those IPs who wish to obtain these titles. The
IPRA, specifically Section 12, also states that IPs have the option to
acquire certificates of title under the provisions of the amended
Commonwealth Act No. 141.
• This Act follows the Torrens System of land registration and titles issued
under this system are called Torrens Titles.
Section 1. Title. These rules shall be known and cited as “The Rules and
Regulations Implementing the Indigenous Peoples’ Rights Act of 1997” (IPRA).
Section 3. Declaration of Policy. The State recognizes the inherent dignity and
equal and inalienable rights of all members of Philippine society as the
foundation of freedom, justice and peace. The rights of indigenous cultural
communities / indigenous peoples are universal, indivisible, interdependent
and interrelated. It is, therefore, the policy of the state to recognize and
promote all individual and collective rights of ICCs/IPs within the framework of
national unity and development in accordance with the Constitution and
applicable norms and principles.
Section 1. Definition of Terms. For purposes of these Rules and Regulations the
following terms shall mean:
a) Ancestral Domains. Refers to all areas generally belonging to
ICCs/IPs, subject to property rights within ancestral domains already existing
and/or vested upon the effectivity of the Act, comprising lands, inland waters,
coastal areas, and natural resources therein, held under a claim of ownership,
occupied or possessed by ICCs/IPs by themselves or through their ancestors,
communally or individually since time immemorial, continuously to the
present, except when interrupted by war, force majeure or displacement by
force, deceit, stealth, or as a consequence of government projects or any
voluntary dealings entered into by the government and private individuals/
corporations, and which are necessary to ensure their economic, social and
cultural welfare. It shall include ancestral lands, forests, pasture, residential,
agricultural, and other lands individually owned whether alienable and
disposable or otherwise; hunting grounds: burial grounds; worship areas;
bodies of water; mineral and other natural resources; and lands which may no
longer be exclusively occupied by ICCs/IPs, but from which they traditionally
had access to, for their subsistence and traditional activities, particularly the
home ranges of ICCs/IPs who are still nomadic and/or shifting cultivators.
b) Ancestral Lands. Refers to land, subject to property rights within
the ancestral domains already existing and/or vested upon effectivity of the
Act, occupied, possessed and utilized by individuals, families and clans who are
members of the ICCs/ IPs since time immemorial, by themselves or through
their predecessors-in-interest, under claims of individual or traditional group
ownership, continuously, to the present except when interrupted by war, force
majeure or displacement by force, deceit, stealth, or as a consequence of
government projects and other voluntary dealings entered into by government
and private individuals/corporations, including, but not limited to, residential
lots, rice terraces or paddies, private forests, swidden farms and tree lots.
c) Certificate of Ancestral Domain Title (CADT). Refers to a title
formally recognizing the rights of possession and ownership of ICCs/IPs over
their ancestral domains identified and delineated in accordance with this law.
d) Certificate of Ancestral Land Title (CALT). Refers to a title formally
recognizing the rights of ICCs/IPs over their ancestral lands.
e) Culture Sensitive. Refers to the quality of being compatible and
appropriate to the culture, beliefs, customs and traditions, indigenous systems
and practices of ICCs/IPs.
f) Communal Claims. Refer to claims on land, resources and rights
thereon belonging to the whole community within a defined territory.
g) Commercial Forest Plantation. Refers to any land planted to
timber producing species, including rubber, and/or non-timber species such as
rattan and bamboo, primarily to supply the raw material requirements of
existing or proposed public or private forest-based industries, energy-
generating plants and related industries.
h) Customary Laws. Refer to a body of written or unwritten rules,
usages, customs and practices traditionally observed, accepted and recognized
by respective ICCs/ IPs.
i) Customs and Practices. Refers to norms of conduct and patterns of
relationships or usages of a community over time accepted and recognized as
binding on all members.
j) Community Intellectual Rights. Refer to the rights of ICCs/IPs to
own, control, develop and protect: (a) the past, present and future
manifestations of their cultures, such as but not limited to, archeological and
historical sites, artifacts, designs, ceremonies, technologies, visual and
performing arts and literature as well as religious and spiritual properties; (b)
science and technology including, but not limited to, human and other genetic
resources, seeds, medicine, health practices, vital medicinal plants, animals
and minerals, indigenous knowledge systems and practices, resource
management systems, agricultural technologies, knowledge of the properties
of fauna and flora, oral traditions, designs, scientific discoveries; and, (c)
language, script, histories, oral traditions and teaching and learning systems.
k) Free and Prior Informed Consent. As used in the Act, shall mean
the consensus of all members of the ICCs/IPs to be determined in accordance
with their respective customary laws and practices, free from any external
manipulation, interference and coercion, and obtained after fully disclosing the
intent and scope of an activity, in a language and process understandable to
the community.
l) Indigenous Cultural Communities/ Indigenous Peoples (ICCs/IPs).
Refer to a group of people or homogenous societies identified by selfascription
and ascription by others, who have continuously lived as organized
community on communally bounded and defined territory, and who have,
under claims of ownership since time immemorial, occupied, possessed and
utilized such territories, sharing common bonds of language, customs,
traditions and other distinctive cultural traits, or who have, through resistance
to political, social and cultural inroads of colonization, non-indigenous religions
and cultures, became historically differentiated from the majority of Filipinos.
ICCs/IPs shall, likewise include peoples who are regarded as indigenous on
account of their descent from the populations which inhabited the country, at
the time of conquest or colonization or at the time of inroads of nonindigenous
religions and cultures or the establishment of present state boundaries who
retain some or all of their own social, economic, cultural and political
institutions, but who may have been displaced from their traditional domains
or who may have resettled outside their ancestral domains.
m) Indigenous Peoples’ Rights Act (IPRA) or Act. Heretofore, the Act
shall refer to Republic Act
No. 8371.
n) Indigenous Political Structures. Refer to organizational and cultural
leadership systems, institutions, relationships, patterns and processes for
decision making and participation identified by ICCs/ IPs such as, but not
limited to, Council of Elders, Council of Timuay, Bodong Holders, or any other
tribunal or body of similar nature.
o) Individual Claims. Refer to claims on land and rights thereon which
have been devolved to individuals, families and clans including, but not limited
to, residential lots, rice terraces or paddies and tree lots.
REPUBLIC ACT NO. 8371
43
THE INDIGENOUS PEOPLE RIGHTS ACT OF 1997
Section. 1. Constitutional and Legal Framework. The State shall protect the
rights of ICCs/IPs to their ancestral domains to ensure their economic, social
and cultural well-being and shall recognize the applicability of customary laws
governing property rights or relations in determining the ownership and extent
of ancestral domains.
Ancestral domain consists of lands, inland waters, coastal areas, minerals and
other natural resources.
Lands within ancestral domains shall include, but not limited to, ancestral
lands, forests, pasturelands, residential lands, agricultural lands, hunting
grounds, burial grounds, worship areas, land no longer occupied by the ICCs/IPs
but from which they traditionally had access to for their subsistence and
traditional activities, home ranges of ICCs/IPs who are still nomadic and/or
shifting cultivators, and other lands individually owned whether alienable and
disposable or otherwise. Ancestral land shall consist of, but not be limited to,
residential lots, rice terraces or paddies, private forests, swidden farms, and
tree lots. Provided that property rights within the ancestral domains already
existing and/or vested upon effectivity of the Act, within ancestral
domains/lands, shall be respected and recognized.
Inland waters and coastal areas include fishing grounds, collecting grounds, and
bodies of
Section 4. Recognition of Ancestral Domain and Land Rights. The rights of the
ICCs/IPs to their ancestral domains and lands by virtue of native title shall be
recognized and respected. Native title to ancestral domains and lands may be
formally recognized or established through the issuance of corresponding
All areas within ancestral domains, whether delineated or not, are presumed to
be communally owned and, pursuant to the indigenous concept of ownership,
could not be sold, disposed nor destroyed.
Areas and resources in the domains are deemed destroyed if on account of the
activity conducted or applied:
a) The area or resource could no longer serve its normal or natural
functions;
b) or That the area or resource is used in a manner not consistent with
customary laws or agreements of the indigenous peoples concerned; or
c) That the area or resource is used or gathered in a wasteful or
excessive manner resulting to irreversible loss or irreparable damage.
Accordingly, the concerned ICC/IP community shall be extended all the benefits
already provided under existing laws, administrative orders, rules and
regulations covering particular resource utilization, extraction or development
projects/activities, without prejudice to additional benefits as may be
negotiated between the parties. The NCIP, as third party, shall, among others,
assist the ICCs/IPs in the negotiation process to safeguard and guarantee that
the terms and conditions of the agreement negotiated are not inimical to the
rights of the ICCs/IPs.
The NCIP shall ensure that at least 30% of all funds received from such activities
will be allocated to the ICC/IP community for development projects or
provision of social services or infrastructure in accordance with their duly
adopted Ancestral Domain Sustainable Development and Protection Plan
(ADSDPP) whenever. In the absence of such ADSDPP, the NCIP shall assist the
ICCs/IPs in the development of a program or project to utilize such funds.
In consultation with ICCs/IPs, the NCIP shall set guidelines for the utilization of
funds accruing to ICCs/IPs.
limited term of 25 years, renewable at the option of the ICCs/IPs for another 25
years, and to visitorial and monitoring powers of the ICCs/IPs and the NCIP for
purposes of ensuring that the ICCs’/IPs’ rights and interests are adequately
safeguarded and protected;
(3) The right of ICCs/IPs to protect, conserve and manage portions of
the ancestral domains/lands which they find necessary for critical watersheds,
mangroves, wildlife sanctuaries, wilderness, protected areas, forest cover or
reforestation, with the full and effective technical and financial support of
concerned government agencies or other legal entities; and
(4) Subject to the customary laws, and Free and Prior Informed
Consent of ICCs/IPs concerned, the right to temporarily allow or permit
appropriate government agencies to manage the areas enumerated in the
preceding paragraph, under a written agreement that shall ensure that: a) a
program of technology transfer shall be pursued to enable the concerned
ICCs/IPs to ultimately manage the area themselves; and b) that no
displacement or dislocation of ICCs/IPs shall occur as a result of the
implementation of the project/activity.
Section 5. Right to Regulate Entry of Migrants and Other Entities. The collective
right to use everything within the domain/land is limited only to the recognized
members of the ICCs/IP community. Accordingly, the ICCs/IPs shall have the
right to regulate the entry of migrants, including organizations who intend to
do business, engage in development or other form of activities, in their
ancestral domains/lands. For this purpose, the following shall be applicable:
a) Migrants. For purposes of these rules, a migrant is a person who is
not a native to the ancestral domain or not a part owner of ancestral land but
who, as a consequence of social, economic, political or other reasons, such as
displacement due to natural disasters, armed conflict, population pressure, or
search for seasonal work, opted to occupy and utilize portions of the ancestral
domains/lands and have since established residence therein;
b) Other entities. Other entities shall include all organizations,
corporations, associations or persons who intend to enter the ancestral
domains/lands for the purpose of doing business, development or other
activities therein; and
c) Procedure for Regulating Entry of Migrants and Other Entities. All
migrants and other entities must first secure the express permission of the
community’s council of elders/leaders who shall, in accordance with their
consensus building process, community practices, customs and traditions and
upon the Free, Prior and Informed Consent of the community members agree
to accept such migrant or entity within the domains, subject to the following
conditions:
(1) Said persons and entities can be allowed to perform activities as
are expressly authorized and which are not inimical to the development of the
ancestral domains and cultural integrity of the ICCs/IPs, and
(2) The ICCs/IPs shall maintain the right to impose penalties for
violation of the conditions in accordance with their customary laws, the Act or
its rules and regulations.
The ICCs/IPs’ Council of Leaders/Elders, with the assistance of NCIP shall take
appropriate action to ensure the effective implementation and enforcement of
these rights.
Within twenty (20) working days from receipt thereof, the concerned Regional
Office shall conduct preliminary evaluation of the ECPP. Based on its findings,
the Regional Office may order the ECPP to be revised and/or additional
requirements may be imposed and/or other documents may be required. The
concerned Regional office shall endorse the ECPP, with recommendations, to
the Commission.
Detailed guidelines for the preparation and implementation of the ECPPs shall
be prescribed by the Commission based on principles underlying the ICCs/IPs
framework for sustainable development of the ancestral domains and
nationally-defined environmental standards.
claim ancestral domains, or parts thereof, which have been reserved for
various purposes.
a) Procedure for Reclaiming Ancestral Domains or Parts Thereof
Proclaimed as Reservations.
(1) For purposes of the enforcement of this right, the NCIP shall
review all existing Executive Orders, Administrative Orders, Presidential
Proclamations covering reservations within ancestral domains to determine
the actual use thereof.
(2) Thereafter, it shall take appropriate steps to cause the
disestablishment of the reservation or the segregation and reconveyance of
ancestral domains or portions thereof to the concerned ICCs/IPs.
b) Conditions for Continued Use of Ancestral Domains as Part of
Reservations. ICCs/IPs communities whose ancestral domains or portions
thereof continue to be used as part of reservations, have the right to negotiate
the terms and conditions thereof in a Memorandum of Agreement. The ICC/IP
community may negotiate for such use, including the grant of benefits such as,
but not limited to, preferential use of facilities in the area and free access to
basic services being dispensed therefrom, through appropriate IP desks to be
established by the administrator of the reservation.
The transferor shall exercise his right to redeem within fifteen years from date
of transfer. The NCIP shall provide, as part of its Rules of Procedures, the
process for the exercise of this right. It shall include the filing of a petition
therefor stating the circumstances of vitiated consent or unconscionable price;
due notice and hearing; and the reconveyance of the property to the transferor
ICC/IP.
Pursuant to Section 12 of the Act, all ancestral lands which have been
individually owned and actually used continuously by ICCs/IPs for a period of at
least thirty (30) years for agricultural, residential, pasture, or tree farming
purposes, including those with slope of more than eighteen (18) degrees are
hereby classified as alienable and disposable agricultural lands and may be
titled in accordance with the provisions of Commonwealth Act No. 141, as
amended.
Ancestral lands within ancestral domains shall remain an integral part thereof
and can only be transferred or otherwise encumbered subject to customary
laws and traditions of the community where the same is located.
The ICCs/IPs shall establish their own institutions, systems and standards for
protecting their natural resources. Such standards shall consider the national
standards as minimum, without prejudice to imposing stricter standards. For
this purpose, the ICCs/IPs shall be authorized by the government, through
appropriate issuance, to exercise powers to apprehend and prosecute all
persons violating environmental and natural resources laws within ancestral
domains in accordance with Section 72 of the Act.
The ICCs/IPs shall have access to all government funds earmarked for
environmental protection in relation to their domains. For this purpose, the
NCIP shall negotiate and enter into agreements with concerned agencies for
the effective transfer of funds appropriated for such purposes to the concerned
indigenous peoples’ communities through the NCIP.
The ICCs/IPs may, on their own initiative, likewise secure funds for such
purposes from other local and foreign sources.
Through their own POs, the concerned ICCs/IPs shall develop their own
systems for undertaking reforestation projects under such terms and
conditions that will ensure the application of IKSPs and customary laws, and
the promotion and propagation of indigenous species as well as those of
ecological importance. All such projects shall be considered an integral part of
the domains and are therefore communally-owned by such ICCs/IPs.
The NCIP shall support the initiatives, projects and activities of ICCs/IPs that will
strengthen and develop their socio-political and leadership systems.
The NCIP shall assist ICCs/IPs to document cases resolved under the indigenous
justice systems, conflict resolution mechanisms and peace building processes in
order to provide references to be used in resolving conflicts involving ICCs/IPs.
ICCs/IPs not included or outside Muslim Mindanao and the Cordilleras shall use
the form and content of their ways of life as may be compatible with the
fundamental rights defined under the 1987 Constitution of the Republic of the
Philippines and other internationally recognized human rights.
The NCIP shall take special measures to guarantee the right of ICCs/IPs to
pursue their economic, social and cultural development at their own choice
and pace and to ensure that economic opportunities created by the
government are extend to them based on freedom of initiative and
selfreliance.
Section 1. Right to Organize and Associate for Collective Actions. The NCIP shall
recognize the vital role of IPOs as autonomous partners in development and
shall fully support the development and empowerment of indigenous peoples’
organizations, or associations to pursue and protect their legitimate and
collective interests and aspirations.
In consultation with the Indigenous Peoples Organizations (IPOs), the NCIP shall
prepare guidelines for strengthening the capability of the members which shall
be culture sensitive and shall cover, among others, the following:
a) Awareness and knowledge of IPRA and its IRR;
b) IPs’ holistic and sustainable development framework;
c) Research and documentation skills particularly in taking the
testimonies of elders by way of individual and group interviews;
d) Community Organization to include traditional leadership,
community and cooperative value system, socio-political structures and
selfadvocacy;
e) Indigenous Knowledge Systems and Practices (IKSPs) to
include but not limited to customary laws, traditions and practices;
sustainable resource management systems and practices; family and
community life value systems;
f) Conflict resolution mechanisms and peace-building
processes;
g) Project management; and
h) Networking and development work partnership with other
POs, NGOs and GOs.
The application for registration shall be filed with the concerned NCIP
Provincial Office with the following attachments:
a) Duly accomplished NCIP Registration Form;
REPUBLIC ACT NO. 8371
60
THE INDIGENOUS PEOPLE RIGHTS ACT OF 1997
b) List of Officers/Leaders;
c) Petition/Resolution signed by authorized officers/or members;
d) Written accounts of organizational decision-making processes;
e) Written commitment to recognize and assert customary laws and
decision-making by consensus.
f) List of authorized representatives of the ICC/IP community;
g) Written accounts of the ICCs/IPs customs and traditions;
h) Written accounts of the ICCs/IPs political structure and institutions;
i) Written accounts of community decision-making processes;
j) Anthropological data; and
k) Genealogical surveys.
The NCIP Provincial Officer shall evaluate and field validate the authenticity of
the IPO and submit a report of the same including the IPO’s application for
registration to the NCIP Regional Director who shall, within 15 days issue the
Certificate of Registration. The NCIP Regional Director shall furnish the National
Office updated lists of all such organizations registered by them.
Section 3. Monitoring and Reporting. All registered IPOs and accredited NGOs
shall submit to the NCIP Field Offices the following documents annually:
a) Change of officers or leaders;
b) Financial and Accomplishment Reports; and c) Changes in programs,
projects or activities.
The NCIP shall establish a data-base for indexing and monitoring all registered
IPOs.
Section 3. Free and Prior Informed Consent. The ICCs/IPs shall, within their
communities, determine for themselves policies, development programs,
projects and plans to meet their identified priority needs and concerns. The
ICCs/IPs shall have the right to accept or reject a certain development
intervention in their particular communities.
Section 4. Scope of ICCs/IPs whose Consent shall be Secured. The scope of the
ICCs/IPs whose free and prior informed consent is required shall depend upon
the impact area of the proposed policy, program, projects and plans, such that:
a) When the policy, program, project or plan affects only the
particular community within the ancestral domain, only such community shall
give their free and prior informed consent;
b) When the policy, program, project or plan affects the entire
ancestral domain, the consent of the concerned ICCs/IPs within the ancestral
domain shall be secured; and
c) When the policy, program, project or plan affects a whole range of
territories covering two or more ancestral domains, the consent of all affected
ICCs/IP communities shall be secured.
The NCIP shall prescribe terms and conditions regarding public presentation,
display, performance and other forms of utilization of ICCs/IPs’ lifeways and
material culture.
authorized representative. The NCIP shall keep a copy of the MOA for records
and monitoring purposes.
Section 1. Equal Protection Before the Law. With due recognition of the
ICCs/IPs’ distinct characteristics and identity, the State shall accord to members
of the ICCs/IPs the rights, protections and privileges enjoyed by the rest of the
citizenry. The NCIP shall ensure that fundamental human rights and freedom
are guaranteed to all members of the ICCs/IPs as already accorded to every
member of society.
Section 2. Rights During Armed Conflict. The ICCs/IPs have the right to declare
their territories as zones of peace and to special protection and security in
periods of armed conflict. The NCIP shall ensure that international standards
are observed for the protection of civilian populations in circumstances of
emergency and armed conflict, particular, the Fourth Geneva Convention of
1949. Accordingly, the State shall not:
a) Recruit children of the ICCs/IPs into the armed forces under any
circumstance;
b) Conscript or recruit ICC/IP individuals against their will to the armed
forces, and in particular for use against other indigenous peoples;
c) Relocate ICC/IP communities to special centers for military
purposes;
d) Force ICC/IP communities, families or individuals to abandon their
lands, territories, or means of subsistence; and
e) Require indigenous individuals to work for military purposes under
discriminatory conditions.
In consultation with the ICCs/IPs who are victims of armed conflict, the NCIP in
collaboration with national and international specialized agencies shall
implement an integrated emergency program for the victim families’ and
communities’ relief and rehabilitation. Such integrated program shall take
special attention on the impact of armed conflict activities to the indigenous
children’s psycho-social functioning and development.
Section 3. Freedom from Discrimination. ICCs/IPs are free and equal to all other
individuals in their dignity as human beings and shall be free from any kind of
adverse discrimination for reason of their indigenous origin or identity. The
NCIP shall ensure that every member of the ICCs/IPs is accorded full respect
as valuable citizens of the Republic of the Philippines.
The NCIP shall take special measures to ensure the effective protection with
regard to the recruitment and conditions of employment of persons belonging
to the ICCs/IPs to the extent that they are not protected by laws applicable to
workers in general.
Section 5. Right to Basic Services. The ICCs/IPs are entitled to basic services.
The equitable delivery of basic services to all ICCs/IPs all over the country shall
be the focus of the NCIP’s Five Year Master Plan. In close coordination with
other government line agencies mandated to deliver basic needs the NCIP
shall work towards the establishment of IP Desks with such agencies but not
limited to Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE), Department of Health
(DOH), Department of Education, Culture and Sports (DECS),
Commission on Higher Education (CHED), National Housing Authority (NHA),
Social Security System (SSS), Technical Education and Skills Authority (TESDA),
National Commission on Culture and the Arts (NCCA), Department of Social
Welfare and Development (DSWD), Department of the Interior and Local
Government (DILG) and other offices for the delivery of basic services covering
employment, vocational training and retraining, housing, sanitation, health,
water, education, infrastructure, electrical facilities and social security.
In consultation with ICCs/IPs the NCIP shall prepare a flexible Five Year Master
Plan focused on the delivery of basic services by among other things doing the
following:
a) Census of IPs;
b) Conduct needs assessment consultations with all ICCs/IPs and
prepare
an inventory of community identified priority basic services;
c) Formulate and incorporate in the Five Year Master Plan, a special
program for meeting the special needs of women, the elderly, youth, children
and differently-abled persons;
d) Provide technical and financial support services for the
empowerment of ICCs/IPs to generate their own resources for basic services in
their ancestral domains; and
e) Collaborate with mandated government line agencies to establish
IP Desks that will ensure and monitor the equitable, effective and efficient
delivery of basic services to ICCs/IPs by the particular agency/or agencies; and
support for the sustained utilization of indigenous self- reliant health care
services by supporting traditional practices of prolonged breast feeding and
use of herbal medicines.
Section 7. Rights of Children and Youth. The NCIP in consultation with ICCs/IPs
shall assess the situation of children and youth both in rural areas and highly
urbanized centers with regards to the recognition, promotion and protection of
their rights as provided in the Act and the Universal Declaration on the Rights
of the Child.
The NCIP shall work closely other government line agencies and international
bodies, such as the Department of Education, Culture and Sports (DECS), the
Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD), Department of
Justice (DOJ), Commission on Human Rights (CHR), Department of Labor and
Employment (DOLE), International Organizations including the World Health
Organization (WHO), the International Labor Organization (ILO) and the United
Nations Children’s Educational Fund (UNICEF); with NGO support groups; and
other agencies mandated to serve the sector and formulate programs and
projects intended for their development and rearing of the children and youth
belonging to the ICCs/IP communities. The NCIP shall ensure the establishment
of an effective mechanism towards the protection of the rights of ICC/IP
children and youth and more specifically the achievement of the following:
a) Production of indigenous education literature about the
indigenous culture in order to facilitate efforts at integrating such subject
matter into the
IP curriculum;
b) Establishment of appropriate mechanisms in accordance with
customary laws, for involving the children and youth in community leadership
and decision making and relevant development programs and activities;
c) Encourage and support the integration of ICCs/IPs IKSPs in both
formal and non-formal educational systems for the formation of both male and
female children and youth;
d) Provision of technical training and education and the
improvement and strengthening of regional state colleges, universities and
technical schools with regards to their role in providing quality education,
relevant to the needs, interests and aspirations of ICCs/IPs children and youth;
and
e) Use of IP dialect or language as the medium of instruction in early
childhood and primary educational levels.
Section 8. Right to Education. In consultation with ICCs/IPs the NCIP shall work,
in collaboration with the Department of Education, Culture and Sports (DECS),
the Commission on Higher Education (CHED) and with private and public
schools at all levels towards the development of appropriate programs and
projects related to the following:
a) The curricula and appropriate teaching materials and
resources;
b) The equitable distribution, selection and implementation of
scholarship programs;
c) Appropriate career development;
d) Training of teachers for IP communities;
e) Construction of school buildings in IP communities;
f) Inclusion of IPs resistance to colonization in the academic
curricula, in the context of IPs assertion and defense of their freedom,
independence and territorial integrity and culture; and
g) Establish schools for living traditions and cultural heritage.
traditions that nurture cultural integrity and diversity and that responds to the
needs of IP communities;
d) Provide adult indigenous peoples with skills needed for civic
efficiency and productivity; and
e) Establish processes and implement affirmative action in the
employment of indigenous teachers in schools within indigenous peoples’
communities and assist indigenous teachers in their professional advancement
as this relate to the protection, promotion and protection of IP rights.
The NCIP in consultation with ICCs/IPs shall take effective measures to promote
affirmative action to systematically eradicate prejudice and discrimination
against indigenous peoples and engender understanding and unity among
ICCs/IPs and all segments of society. The ICCs/IPs diverse cultures, traditions
and beliefs shall not be allowed to sow divisiveness and disunity among them.
Through the IP Desks in government line agencies, the NCIP shall ensure that all
policies, programs and services shall promote the recognition and respect for
ICCs/IPs’ cultural diversity.
In close coordination with the Office of the Civil Registrar General (OCRG) the
NCIP shall take appropriate measures to facilitate the registration of the
ICCs/IPs indigenous names. For purposes of effective and efficient civil
registration of births and deaths and census taking, the NCIP field offices shall
be deputized to register said births and deaths. The paternal or maternal
grandfather’s name may be used as surname. All registrations and census shall
be submitted to the nearest Office of Local Registrar.
The ICCs/IPs have the right to their histories and to maintain the indigenous
names of places within and outside their domains that reflect their unique
identity.
Section 10. Protection of Community Intellectual Property. The ICCs/IPs have
the right to own, control, develop and protect the following:
a) The past, present and future manifestations of their cultures, such
as but not limited to, archeological and historical sites, artifacts, designs,
ceremonies, technologies and visual and performing arts and literature as well
as religious and spiritual properties;
b) Science and Technology including, but not limited to, human and
other genetic resources, seeds, medicines, health practices, vital medicinal
plants, animals, minerals, indigenous knowledge systems and practices,
resource management systems, agricultural technologies, knowledge of the
properties of flora and fauna, and scientific discoveries; and
c) Language, Music, Dances, Script, Histories, Oral Traditions, Conflict
Resolution Mechanisms, Peace Building Processes, Life Philosophy and
Perspectives and Teaching and Learning Systems.
In partnership with the ICCs/IPs, the NCIP shall establish effective mechanisms
for protecting the indigenous peoples’ community intellectual property rights
along the principle of first impression first claim, the Convention on
Biodiversity, the Universal Declaration of Indigenous Peoples’ Rights, and the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Section 12. Right to Indigenous Spiritual Beliefs and Traditions. The ICCs/IPs
have the right to:
a) Manifest, practice, develop and teach their spiritual beliefs,
traditions, customs and ceremonies;
b) Maintain, protect and have access to their spiritual and cultural sites;
c) Use and control ceremonial objects; and
d) Repatriation of human remains and artifacts collected without their
free and prior informed consent.
To ensure that indigenous sacred places, including burial sites are preserved,
respected and protected, the ICCs/IPs shall regulate access to these sacred
sites.
The infusion of science and technology in the field of agriculture, forestry and
medicine to ICCs/IPs is subject to their free and prior informed consent and
shall build upon existing indigenous peoples knowledge and systems and
selfreliant and traditional cooperative systems of the particular community.
Indigenous peoples shall also have the right to equitably share in the benefits
of such presentation or performance. All funds collected from these activities
shall be managed directly by the community concerned through the registered
IPO, otherwise, the same shall be held in trust by the NCIP for the benefit of
the concerned IP community.
Section 17. Protection of Biological and Genetic Resources. The ICCs/IPs may,
on their own initiative, make an inventory of biological and genetic resources
REPUBLIC ACT NO. 8371
78
THE INDIGENOUS PEOPLE RIGHTS ACT OF 1997
found inside their domains/lands, for their exclusive use. They shall retain and
reserve all rights pertaining to the storage, retrieval, and dissemination of the
information, in whatever form and system, gathered as a result of the
inventory. A certificate of free and prior informed consent shall be required in
case the concerned ICCs/IPs may enter into a joint undertaking with natural or
juridical persons for the use of biological and genetic resources for industrial,
commercial, pharmaceutical and other profit-making purposes and ventures.
Violation hereof shall be strictly prohibited and subject to penalties under
customary law and as provided for by the Act. The NCIP shall assist the
concerned ICCs/IPs in the enforcement hereof.
The NCIP shall adopt programs for research and development of the ICCs/IPs’
agricultural systems and provide necessary funds therefor.
Section 19. Funds for Archeological and Historical Sites. The ICCs/IPs shall
initiate proposals for the management and preservation of their archeological
and historical sites with the adequate and effective technical and financial
support of the appropriate government agencies. All funds allocated for the
management of these sites shall be immediately transferred to the IPs
concerned through the NCIP. For this purpose, the NCIP shall take the
necessary steps to ascertain that these funds are transferred to the
communities concerned.
Part II: NCIP as an Independent Agency Under the Office of the President.
Section 2. Annual Reports. Within sixty (60) days after the close of each
calendar year, the Commission shall submit an Annual Report to the Office of
the President which shall reflect the status of policy formulation and
Section 5. Tenure. The members of the Commission shall hold office for a
period of three (3) years, and may be subject to re-appointment for another
term. In no case shall a Commissioner serve for more than two (2) terms, or six
consecutive years. Appointment to any vacancy shall only be for the unexpired
term of the predecessor and in no case shall a member be appointed or
designated in a temporary or acting capacity.
Section 6. Compensation. The Chairperson and the Commissioners shall be
entitled to compensation in accordance with the Salary Standardization Law.
Section 7. Removal from Office. Any member of the NCIP may be removed
from office for cause, after due notice and hearing, by the President on his own
initiative or upon recommendation by any ICC/IP community before the
expiration of his term and after complying with the due process requirement of
law.
Section 1: Offices within the NCIP. The NCIP shall have the following offices
which shall be responsible for the implementation of the policies, plans and
programs herein provided.
a) Ancestral Domains Office
b) Office on Policy, Planning and Research
c) Office on Education, Culture and Health
d) Office on Socio-Economic Services and Special Concerns
e) Office of Empowerment and Human Rights
f) Administrative Office
g) Legal Affairs Office
h) Office of the Executive Director
i) Regional and Field Offices
j) Other Offices
Regulations, provide cartographic services and upon the final and official
delineation of the ancestral domain/land, endorse the same to the Commission
for the issuance of the appropriate titles thereto;
b) Conduct, upon the request of ICCs/IPs concerned, surveys of
ancestral lands, verify and approve parcellary or subdivision surveys of the
same;
c) Issue, upon the free and prior informed consent of the ICCs/IPs
concerned, certification prior to the grant of any license, lease or permit for the
exploitation of natural resources affecting the interest of the ICCs/IPs and their
ancestral domains;
d) Assist the ICCs/IPs in protecting the territorial integrity of each and
every ancestral domain;
e) Coordinate and ensure the enforcement of policies and laws
protecting the rights of ICCs/IPs to their ancestral domains and land, including
the application of customary laws governing property rights and relations in
determining ownership procedures and standards therefor; and for the
purpose, seek the assistance of appropriate government and non-government
agencies;
f) Be responsible for conducting census of the ICCs/IPs within an
ancestral domain;
g) Keep a registry of CADTs and CALTs or any formal certificate of
recognition which officially and formally acknowledges the existence of
ancestral domain rights over the area;
h) Compile information on the location, size, and number of people
living within the ancestral domains;
i) Review all government grants, reservations, franchises and
projects, licenses, leases, concessions and titles which affect ancestral domains
and recommend to the Commission the cancellation of the same or
segregation of such portions within ancestral domains in order to reconvey the
same to the
ICCs/IPs concerned as part of the ancestral domains;
j) Formulate and implement such procedures for the cancellation of
officially documented titles which were acquired through spurious or illegal
means and those for the redemption of lands lost through the ICCs/IPs vitiated
consent or through sale for an unconscionable price;
k) Establish its own, or in cooperation with other government
agencies a Geographic Information System that would assist ICCs/IPs in
formulating
b) Ensure that the Basic Human Rights and such other rights as
the NCIP may determine, subject to existing laws, rules and regulations
are protected and promoted;
c) To assist ICCs/IPs work out an appropriate interface
between customary political structures and self-governance with the
mainstream machinery for governance including the establishment and
administration of tribal barangays and support for autonomous regions;
d) To ensure that the basic elements of free and prior
informed consent
are present and are complied with in all instances when such must be secured;
e) To study and establish models for appropriate interface in
tribal and
non-tribal governance;
f) Facilitate the participation of ICCs/IPs in all national and
international fora where their effective representation is required;
g) Conduct researches on the IP women and youth situation
including their basic human rights situation and recommend programs
for their development in accordance with indigenous practices;
h) Empower ICCs/IP communities through community
organizing; and
i) Perform such other functions as the Commission may deem
appropriate and necessary.
Section 7. Administrative Office. This office shall provide the NCIP with
economical, efficient and effective services pertaining to personnel, finance,
records, equipment, security, supplies and related services. It shall:
a) Study and recommend the organizational and functional set
up of the Commission, and to upgrade and develop personnel skills
through a comprehensive program, taking into special consideration
issues of ethnicity and divergence in ethnic origins of the staff and the
diversity of cultures of its
ICC/IP clientele;
b) Develop systematic records management including systems
for
participating in the electronic communications highway;
c) Develop and maintain a personnel program which shall
include recruitment, selection, appointment, transfer, performance
evaluation and employee relations;
Section 9. Office of the Executive Director. The Office of the Executive Director
shall serve as the secretariat of the Commission. It shall be headed by an
Executive Director who shall be appointed on a permanent basis by the
President of the Philippines upon recommendation of the Commission. He/she
shall be under the supervision of the Commission through the Chairperson and
shall hold office regularly during business hours on all working days and shall
perform the following functions:
a) Advise and assist the Chairman in the formulation and
implementation of the objectives, policies, plans, and programs of the
Commission;
b) Serve as the principal assistant of the Chairman in the
overall
Section 1. Regional Offices and Field Offices. The Commission shall operate
and maintain sub-national offices such as the regional and field offices
consistent with its mandate and organizational objectives, the NCIP shall
operate and maintain Regional Offices.
a) The regional offices shall be distributed according to equitable
number of the clientele population. Regional centers shall be physically located
in strategic geographical sites to maximize the delivery of basic services and
technical support to ICCs/IPs. The distribution of resources shall be
proportionate to the number of clientele and requirements of the ancestral
domains/lands of ICCs/IPs located in each region. The distribution of the
regional offices is as follows:
(1) Ilocos Region - to serve the indigenous peoples in the Provinces of
Ilocos Norte, Ilocos Sur, La Union, and Pangasinan;
(2) Cordillera Region - to serve the IPs in the City of Baguio and the
Provinces of Abra, Benguet, Mountain Province, Ifugao, Kalinga and Apayao;
(3) Caraballo and Cagayan Valley Region - to serve the IPs in the
Provinces of Batanes, Cagayan, Isabela, Quirino, and Nueva Viscaya;
(4) Pinatubo and Northern Sierra Madre Region - to serve the IPs in
the Provinces ofBulacan, Aurora, Nueva Ecija, Tarlac, Pampanga, Zambales, and
Bataan;
(5) Southern Sierra Madre and Bicol Region - to serve the IPs in the
Provinces of Rizal, Quezon, National Capital Region, Camarines Sur, Camarines
Norte, Albay, and Sorsogon;
(6) Western Islands Region - to serve the IPs in the island Provinces of
Palawan, OrientalMindoro, Occidental Mindoro, and Romblon;
(7) Central Philippine Islands Region - to serve the IPs in the island
provinces of Antique, Aklan, Capiz, Iloilo, Guimaras, Cebu, Negros Occidental,
Negros Oriental, and Bohol;
(8) Zamboanga Peninsula Region - to serve IPs in the provinces of
Zamboanga del Norte, Zamboanga del Sur, and Basilan;
(9) Northwestern Mindanao Region- to serve the IPs in the provinces
of MisamisOccidental, Misamis Oriental, Bukidnon and Camiguin;
(10) Northeastern Mindanao Region - to serve the IPs in the Provinces
of Surigao del Norte, Surigao del Sur Agusan del Norte, Agusan del Sur;
(11) Southern and Eastern Mindanao Region - to serve the IPs in the
provinces of Davao Oriental, Davao del Sur, Compostela Valley, Davao del
Norte, South Cotabato, Sarangani, and the cities Davao, Tagum and Island
Garden City of Samal; and
(12) Central Mindanao Region - to serve IPs in the provinces of Lanao
del Norte, North Cotabato, Sultan Kudarat, and the cities of Cotabato, Iligan
and Marawi;
b) Field Offices at the provincial and community levels shall likewise
be created. These shall be known respectively as Provincial Offices and
Community Service Centers.
c) Existing regional offices shall continue to function within the
purview of reorganization, revitalization and strengthening of the NCIP
structure. The Commission shall determine the number and scope of Regional,
provincial and community service centers based on the management principles
of economy, efficiency and effectiveness.
d) Other field offices shall be created wherever appropriate and the
staffing pattern thereof shall be determined by the NCIP: Provided; that in
provinces where there are ICCs/IPs but without field offices, the NCIP shall
establish appropriate field offices thereat.
Section 2. Other Offices. The NCIP shall have the power to create additional
offices as it may deem necessary subject to existing rules and regulations, such
as, but not limited to, the following:
The ICCs/IPs and the concerned government agencies may enter into
agreements on the exercise of joint management responsibilities over such
areas. Such agreements shall, whenever possible, incorporate a plan for the
eventual transfer of full management powers and responsibilities to the
ICCs/IPs. The NCIP shall exercise visitorial and monitoring powers to safeguard
the rights of the ICCs/IPs under the agreement.
effectivity of the Act by filling up the appropriate NCIP Form and filing it with
the NCIP Service Center.
c) Application for Issuance of Certificate of Ancestral Land Title of
Ancestral Lands outside Ancestral Domains. Claimants of ancestral lands
located outside certified ancestral domains may have such ancestral lands
officially established by filling up the appropriate NCIP Form and filing it with
the NCIP Service Center which has jurisdiction over the land. It shall be
accompanied by a testimony under oath of the elders of the ICC/IP who
are knowledgeable of such claim and any other documentary proof showing
continuous occupation, utilization or possession of the area since time
immemorial which shall be any of the following:
(1) Written accounts of the ICCs/IPs customs and traditions;
(2) Written accounts of the ICCs/IPs political structure and
institutions;
(3) Pictures showing long term occupation such as those of old
improvements, burial grounds, sacred places and old villages;
(4) Historical accounts, including pacts and agreements concerning
boundaries entered into by the ICCs/IPs concerned with other ICCs/IPs;
(5) Survey plans and sketch maps;
(6) Anthropological data; (7) Genealogical surveys;
(8) Pictures and descriptive histories of traditional communal forests
and hunting grounds;
(9) Pictures and descriptive histories of traditional landmarks such as
mountains, rivers,
creeks, ridges, hills, terraces and the like; and
(10) Write-ups of names and places derived from the native dialect of
the community.
d) Notice and Publication. Upon receipt of the application the
NCIP Service Center shall cause the publication of such application in
accordance with the following procedure:
(1) The NCIP Service Center shall prepare a copy of the petition
and survey or sketch plans, these being the basic documents of the
ancestral land claim, including a translation thereof in the native
language of the ICCs/IPs concerned;
(2) These documents shall be posted in a conspicuous or
prominent place within the ancestral land which may be, but not limited
to, the tribal hall, the market place or places of worship and the Service
Center, Provincial and Regional Offices of the NCIP for at least fifteen
(15) days;
(3) Whenever available, the basic documents shall also be
published in a newspaper of general circulation in the area once a week
for two consecutive weeks to allow other claimants to file opposition
thereto within fifteen (15) days from the date of last publication; and
(4) In areas where no newspapers exist, broadcasting in a radio
station could be a valid substitute for publication. In case of broadcast,
the same shall be made twice in a week and any opposition may be filed
within 15 days from date of last broadcast. If both newspaper and radio
station are not available, the mere posting of the basic documents as in
stated in sub-paragraph (b) above shall be deemed sufficient and any
opposition thereto must be filed within 15 days from last day of posting.
e) Ocular Inspection and Appreciation of Proof. Within fifteen
(15) days after such publication, the NCIP Service Center shall conduct an
ocular inspection and investigation thereof. Notices shall be sent to the
applicant and owners of adjoining properties at least five days before the
scheduled date of ocular inspection. If the NCIP Service Center finds the
same meritorious, it shall request the NCIP Regional Office, for a
technical survey of the area. However, it may reject any application for
CALT which it finds patently false or fraudulent upon investigation and
shall give the applicant due notice of the action taken including the
grounds for the denial. Such denial is appealable to the NCIP in
accordance with the procedure prescribed herein.
f) Resolution of Conflicting Claims. In case of conflicting claims,
the NCIP Service Center shall refer the same to the Council of
Elders/Leaders in the community for settlement. In case of failure of
settlement thereat, the NCIP Service Center shall endeavor to cause the
contending parties to meet and help them come up with a preliminary
resolution of the conflict. Upon the exhaustion of all possible remedies,
the same conflict may however be submitted for full adjudication under
Section 62 of the Act, in which the Director of Lands may take part to
represent the interest of the Republic of the Philippines.
g) Parcellary Survey. -Upon the recommendation of the NCIP
Service Center, through the NCIP Provincial Office, the Surveys Division
of the NCIP Regional Office shall conduct a parcellary survey of the area.
Upon the completion of the survey and approval thereof, the survey
returns and the approved survey plan shall be returned to the NCIP
Service Center through the Provincial Office.
REPUBLIC ACT NO. 8371
108
THE INDIGENOUS PEOPLE RIGHTS ACT OF 1997
This provision shall not prejudice the right of ICCs/ IPs to redemption of lands
transferred under vitiated consent and/or unconscionable consideration as
provide for in Chapter III, Section 8 of the Act and these Rules and Regulations.
Section 1. Right to Manage and Develop Ancestral Domains. The ICCs/IPs shall
have the right to freely pursue their economic, social, political and cultural
development. In the exercise of this right, the ICCs/IPs shall formulate and
pursue their own plans for the sustainable management and development of
the land and natural resources as well as human resources within their
ancestral domains based on their indigenous knowledge systems and practices
and on the principle of self-determination. Such plans may be consolidated into
an Ancestral Domain Sustainable Development and Protection Plan (ADSDPP)
which shall be the basis of the Five Year Master Plan defined under these Rules
and Regulations.
Section 8. Five Year Master Plan. Based on the Ancestral Domain Sustainable
Development and Protection Plans (ADSDPP) of the various ICCs/IPs and other
relevant information, the Office on Policy, Planning and Research shall
formulate a Five-Year Master Plan for the delivery of appropriate support
services to the ICCs/IPs.
The Five-Year Master Plan shall also indicate the priorities for development of
the ICCs/IPs affecting their lives, beliefs, institutions, spiritual well-being and
ancestral domains or lands pursuant to Section 17 of the Act.
The NCIP in collaboration with the ICCs/IPs concerned shall closely monitor the
implementation of the Project and for this purpose may gain access to the
premises, facilities, records and documents of the project to ascertain that
their rights are adequately protected.
Section 10. Right to Stop and Suspend Projects. The NCIP, may motu propio or
upon the instance of ICCs/IPs, shall have the right to stop and suspend the
implementation of any development program, project, policy or plan, and after
due investigation and proof that consent was obtained due to manipulation,
coercion, intimidation and deceit or where proponent has violated any or all of
the terms and conditions stipulated in the Memorandum of Agreement.
Whenever applicable and after due notice, the cash bond deposited or surety
bond posted by the proponent shall be confiscated and forfeited to answer for
compensatory measures shall be imposed upon the proponent.
Section 11. Exemption from Taxes. All lands certified as Ancestral Domains shall
be exempt from the payment of real property taxes, special levies, and other
forms of exaction except such portions of the ancestral domains as are actually
used for large-scale agriculture, commercial forest plantations and residential
purposes or upon titling by private persons.
All conflicts related to the ancestral domains or lands where one of the parties
is a non- ICC/IP or where the dispute could not be resolved through customary
law shall be heard and adjudicated in accordance with the Rules on Pleadings,
Practice and Procedures Before the NCIP to be adopted hereafter.
All decisions of the NCIP may be brought on Appeal by Petition for Review to
the Court of Appeals within fifteen (15) days from receipt of the Order or
Decision.
ownership as defined in Republic Act No. 386, otherwise known as the New
Civil Code of the Philippines;
f) In the resolution of controversies arising under the Act, where no
legal provisions or jurisprudence apply, the customs and traditions of the
concerned ICCs/IPs shall be resorted to; and
g) The interpretation and construction of any of the provisions of the
Act shall not in any manner adversely affect the rights and benefits of the
ICCs/IPs under other conventions, international treaties and instruments,
national laws, awards, customary laws and agreements.
damage to any of the parties to the case or seriously affect social or economic
activity.
Section 6. No Restraining Order or Preliminary Injunction. No inferior court of
the Philippines shall have jurisdiction to issue any restraining order or writ of
preliminary injunction against the NCIP or any of its duly authorized or
designated offices in any case, dispute or controversy arising from, necessary
to, or interpretation of the Act and other pertinent laws relating to ICCs/IPs and
ancestral domains.
Section 1. Sourcing and Appropriation. The NCIP shall endeavor to realize the
amounts intended for the Ancestral Domain Fund appropriated under Section
71 of the Act. It shall augment this fund by actively seeking additional
government funds and soliciting donations, endorsements and grants from
various sources, including foreign funds made available for the ICCs/IPs
through the Government of the Philippines under the national implementation
scheme. Only the Chairman of the NCIP or his duly-designated representatives,
shall have the authority to receive such donations, endowments or grants,
which shall be fully documented and disseminated to all concerned.
Section 3. Reporting and Audit. The Ancestral Domain Fund shall be subject to
the usual government accounting and auditing procedures. A consolidated
report of expenditures under this fund shall be prepared and presented to the
NCIP en banc regularly on a quarterly basis. The same report shall also be
presented to the Consultative Body when it is in session and made available to
any indigenous cultural community PO or Council of Elders upon request.
Section 1. Persons Liable. The following are liable for punishment for violation
of the rights of ICCs/IPs enumerated in the Act:
a) Any individual, whether a member of the same or different
ICC/IP
community or not;
b) Any individual who is non-IP, whether a Filipino or alien;
c) In case of violation of rights committed by juridical persons,
the Manager, President, Chief Executive Officer, or any of the officers of
such juridical persons; and d) Government officials, officers or
employees.
Section 2. Reorganization Procedures. The procedures for the merger are the
following:
a) Revitalization and Strengthening. To achieve this purpose, the NCIP
shall:
1) Form a common staff support system which shall be organized
along the various offices and functions of the Commission as provided in
Sections 46 to 49 of the Act;
2) Maintain a multi-level structure from the national to sub-national
and community levels, to ensure a responsive, competent organization.
Subnational offices are categorized as regional and provincial offices. The basic
unit of organization is the Community Service Center. These offices shall
perform according to the operating principles cited in these Implementing
Rules and Regulations;
3) Relocation and establishment of Service Centers in strategic sites
intended to serve the most number of constituents in contiguous ancestral
domains/lands for greater efficiency, effectiveness and economy: Provided;
that officers and employees assigned to Service Centers shall receive
compensation and incentives commensurate to the risks and hardship of
these Service Centers: Provided further; that the NCIP shall assign the most
qualified, experienced personnel, possessing of proven inter-disciplinary
skills to facilitate a people-centered development program;
4) Reorientation of the work ethic and values of all officers and
employees through regular and intensive human resource and organization
development programs in the context of the IPRA; and
5) Cultivation of a policy of preferential option for IPs in the
personnel policies of the NCIP.
of the ONCC and OSCC are deemed retired and shall be on holdover status
upon the effectivity of the Act, until the issuance of a thirty (30-day) notice of
termination;
c) Notice of Termination. Incumbent ONCC/OSCC officials and
employees shall be individually served a notice of termination of service thirty
(30) days before such termination;
d) Staffing Pattern. The NCIP shall prepare a staffing pattern
composed of newly created positions subject to the approval of the
Department of Budget and Management and the Civil Service Commission and
shall implement the same; and
e) Criteria for Filling Up of the Newly Created Positions. The newly
created positions shall be filled up according to the:
1) Qualifications and standards set by the Civil Service; and
2) Criteria of retention and appointment prepared by the
consultative body convened for this purpose, for the implementation of the
Placement Committee.
of staff support as the Commission may require in preparation for the full
functional operation of the new offices created under
Sections 46 to 50 of the Act; iv) Preparatory policy planning and research
activities for institutional development of the NCIP and formulation of
development programs in line with the IPRA framework;
v) Activities in response to special concerns affecting IPs as may be
brought to the attention of the Commission; and, vi) Setting up of mechanisms
of technical/financial cooperation with foreign funding agencies and Civil
Society, for the implementation of its policies, programs and projects; and vii)
Such other tasks pertinent to the implementation of the IPRA, as may be
required by the NCIP.
RULE XIII. FINAL PROVISIONS
Section 1. Special Provision. The provisions of the Act relating to the civil,
political, social and human rights and those pertaining to the identification,
delineation, recognition, and titling of ancestral lands and domains are
applicable throughout the entire country: Provided; That lands within the
Baguio Townsite Reservation shall not be reclassified except through
appropriate legislation: Provided further; That all land rights and titles acquired
or recognized in Baguio City through judicial, administrative or other processes
before the effectivity of the Act shall remain valid: Provided finally; That the
City of Baguio shall not dispossess claimants of their undocumented private
lands as guaranteed under Act No. 1963, as amended by Act No. 2711, C.A. No.
143 and R. A. No. 329.
Section 3. Repealing and Amending Clause. All Administrative Orders, rules and
regulations, memoranda, circulars, and other orders inconsistent herewith or
contrary to the provisions of these rules and regulations are hereby repealed or
modified accordingly. The Commission shall have the authority, among others,
to amend, revise, add to, supplement, interpret, clarify, delete, or make
exemptions to any provision of these rules and regulations with the end in view
of ensuring that the provisions of the Act are properly implemented and
enforced, and the goals and objectives adequately achieved. Section 4.
Effectivity. These rules shall take effect fifteen (15) days upon its publication in
any two newspapers of general circulation. APPROVED this 9th of June, 1998.
I. PRELIMINARY PROVISIONS
c. IKSPs as sui generis. IKSPs belong to a class of its own and are the
collective property of the ICCs/IPs. Therefore, the author, composer, inventor,
writer, choreographer, arranger, lyricist, owner, first user, or preacher is not
one individual but all the members of the community who belong to the past,
present and future generations.
d. Free and Prior Informed Consent (FPIC). The FPIC of the ICCs/IPs to
any research activity that affects them shall be secured before any such
activity/ies may commence. This is in recognition to their intellectual
contribution in the development of knowledge, and their rights over this
knowledge and resources. Accordingly, their voluntary consent should be
based on informed opinion, which means that they should be fully informed
what the activity/research is all about, what are the resources that will be
gathered, and the aspects of benefit-sharing, among other concerns.
e. Equitable sharing of benefits. Arrangements over benefit sharing
are tied to the recognition by the State of the rights of the ICCs/IPs over their
ancestral domains, the resources therein, and the past, present and future
tangible and intangible cultural heritage including the derivatives, of their
IKSPs. The State shall ensure equitable sharing of benefits arising from the
generation and utilization of knowledge, innovations and practices of ICCs/IPs
embodying traditional lifestyles. Innovative forms and formula for
benefitsharing that are acceptable to all parties shall be developed.
Benefits need not necessarily come in monetary terms nor should it be
confined to share in the royalties or up-front payments. Non-monetary forms
of benefits should be explored. In cases where provision for technology
transfer is provided, such technology transfer shall not be limited to the level
of scientists and researchers but should primarily extend to the members of
the indigenous cultural community.
f. Protection of Community Intellectual Rights, Cultural
Resources/Treasures and Traditional Cultural Expressions. The ICCs/IPs’
community intellectual rights, cultural resources/treasures, religious, cultural
sites and ceremonies shall be recognized, respected, promoted and
protected from any adverse impact arising from the research activity. As such,
actions to identify these adverse risks and impacts must be made and fully
disclosed to the community concerned and measures for the elimination of the
occurrence of such risks and adverse impacts, or their mitigation must be put
in place. Furthermore, the ICCs/IPs shall have the sole and exclusive right to
determine the extent, content or manner of presentation of the information or
knowledge that may be published or communicated with regard to their
religious and cultural beliefs, rituals and/or ceremonial objects and heritage
sites.
g. Diversity and Uniqueness of the Culture of ICCs/IPs. The diversity
of cultures, traditions, beliefs and aspirations, institutions, leadership and
decision making systems of ICCs/IPs shall be recognized and fostered in
openness, mutual respect and peaceful co-existence. Research must show
appreciation of the unique cultures, histories, traditions, beliefs, languages,
institutions and world views of the ICCs/IPs as sources of collective strengths,
and shall not be used to sow divisiveness, disunity or discord in society.
h. Participatory. The full participation of the ICCs/IPs, being the
culture-
bearers/owners, in all levels and stages of the research shall be required. The
nature and dynamics of participation of concerned stakeholders shall strictly
adhere to customary law.
i. Culture Sensitivity. The cultural peculiarities and specific
circumstances of particular ICCs/IPs shall be respected and given due
consideration. Research activities should focus on helping correct historical
injustices inflicted on ICCs/IPs since time immemorial and facilitate
safeguarding of their cultural and historical heritage.
Section 7. Scope and Coverage. This Guidelines shall cover the following
researches/documentation:
a. Community initiated or solicited researches. Research activities
solicited, commissioned or conducted by the concerned ICCs/IPs themselves to
be undertaken within or affecting the ancestral domain.
b. Academic Researches. Those conducted pursuant to a scholastic
program and/or researches required to earn a particular academic
accreditation or degree.
c. Researches in Aid of Policy. All researches conducted for the
purpose
of developing policies or programs intended for the benefit ICCs/IPs.
d. Social Researches. These are researches conducted for the
purpose of understanding the historical and cultural heritage, as well as nature,
social relations and dynamics of IP communities, and those involving their
various traditional cultural expressions.
e. Researches necessary to implement the mandates of NCIP. These
include all types of researches needed to enforce the mandates of the NCIP
including, but not limited to, those involving delineation of ancestral
Section 8. Common Provisions. The procedure outlined below shall apply to all
researches and documentations, except for the category outlined in:
a. Researches and documentations in aid of delineation and titling of
AD/ALs conducted by
NCIP personnel, the IPs themselves or accredited private entities or individuals;
b. Researches and documentations in aid of ADSDPP formulation
conducted by NCIP personnel or accredited private entities or individuals.
In so far as biological and genetic prospecting and commercial research
are concerned, the pertinent provisions of NCIP Administrative Order No. 3,
Series of 2012 shall apply. Researches and documentation conducted by NCIP
personnel and IPs for the purposes of delineation and titling of ADs/ALs shall be
governed by NCIP Administrative Order NO. 4, Series of 2012. Researches and
documentations conducted by NCIP personnel and IPs in aid of ADSDPP
formulation shall be governed by the A.O No. 1, Series of 2004.
Section 8.2. Review and Evaluation of the Application. The TMSD Chief, with
the assistance of the Regional Legal Officer, shall review and evaluate the
application, attachments and other supporting documents to determine the
sufficiency thereof. If on the basis of objective evaluation, the research work
proposal is lacking in material points or there is a need to revise the same to
make it culturally appropriate, it shall be communicated and remanded to the
researcher for compliance.
Section 8.4. IKSP Team. Upon recommendation of the TMSD Chief that the
application is sufficient and meritorious, the Regional Director shall
immediately form the IKSP Team. The team shall be composed of the Provincial
Legal Officer, Community Development Officer and Tribal Affairs Assistant
having jurisdiction of the area subject of the research. The team shall facilitate
the proceedings provided in this Guidelines.
Section 8.6. Work and Financial Plan; Contents. The Work and Financial Plan
shall contain the following:
a. Expenses for food and transportation of the IC/IP
community elders/leaders and members who will attend meetings,
conferences and other activities identified in the succeeding sections;
b. Documentation expenses (e.g. photo and/or video, cassette
recording, reproduction of documents);
c. Other logistics costs.
The amount identified in the WFP shall be held by the applicant and to be
disbursed for the purposes for which they are intended.
Section 8.7. Conference and Disclosure. Within five (5) days from the approval
and signing of the WFP, the IKSP Team shall schedule a conference between
the community members and the applicant on a date and at a venue agreed
upon by all concerned. The conference shall be held in order to allow the
applicant to present the following:
a. The purpose/s of the research
b. Parameters
c. Methodologies
d. Materials
e. Cost and source of fund of the research
f. Related information on the intended research,
g. Benefits that the community may derive from the research activity
h. Data gathering tools
i. Research work plan
In case the ICCs/IPs accept the research application, they shall, during the
decision-making process, identify the selected key informant/s, the extent of
In case of denial by the ICCs/IPs, the IKSP Team shall submit to the RD a report
on proceedings conducted together with the resolution of denial by the
community.
Section 8.9. MOA Preparation, Negotiation and Signing. Within five (5) days
from the manifestation by the concerned ICCs/IPs of their consent to the
research application, a memorandum of agreement (MOA) shall be prepared
and negotiated by the parties. The NCIP IKSP Team shall facilitate and assisting
the drafting and negotiation of the terms and conditions of the agreement.
The terms and conditions of the MOA agreed to by all the parties shall be
written in the primary language or dialect spoken and understood by the
ICCs/IPs, and translated into English or Filipino. After final review of the MOA
by all the parties, the same shall be signed by the authorized ICC/IP
representative/s and the researcher. The concerned Regional Director shall
sign the MOA after submission by the IKSP Team of their report. A copy of the
MOA shall be furnished the Central Office through the OPPR. The MOA shall be
the basis for the issuance of the Certification Precondition by the Regional
Director.
Section 8.11. Submission of Report. Within ten (10) days from the conduct of
the MOA negotiation and signing, the IKSP Team shall submit to the Regional
Director their report and recommendations, together with the resolution of
consent issued by the ICCs/IPs and the MOA signed by the parties for his/her
appropriate action.
Section 8.12. Issuance of the Certification Precondition. Within ten (10) days
from the submission by the IKSP Team of their report and favorable
recommendation, the Regional Director shall issue the Certification
Precondition.
Section 8.13. Extension of Time. In case the applicant fails to complete the
research within the period stipulated, a request for extension may be filed
through a letter addressed to the elders/leaders of the community. The grant
or denial of said motion shall be embodied in a resolution. A copy of said letter
and resolution shall be furnished the Regional Office.
Section 8.14. Output Validation. Within ten (10) days from the completion of
the research, the researcher shall present the output to the community for
validation. The IKSP Team shall facilitate the conduct of validation. The result of
the validation shall be contained in a resolution to be issued by the community
indicating therein the ICCs/IPs’ general impression on the genuineness of the
output and compliance to the MOA and research process. A Certificate of
Validation shall also be issued by the ICCs/IPs immediately after the conduct of
the validation process.
Section 8.17. Publication. The community shall have the sole and exclusive
right to determine the extent, content or manner of presentation of the
information or knowledge that may be published or communicated if the
research output pertains to their religious, cultural beliefs, ceremonial
paraphernalia or sites. Such determination must be clearly outlined in
the memorandum of agreement or in any document appended thereto and
referred to therein.
Section 10. Exception to the Process. Sections 8.1 to 8.17 and the above
requirement on benefits shall not apply to researches undertaken by pupils and
high school students to complete requirements for subject courses or in
finishing basic education.
Section 11. Researches and Documentations by the NCIP. For researches and
documentations necessary to implement the mandates of the NCIP, the
following procedure shall apply:
Section 11.1. Transmittal. The letter of intent, together with the project
proposal containing the purpose, methodology, the process or procedure of
the research, shall be submitted to the IP community concerned.
Section 11.2. Conference and Disclosure. Within five (5) days from the
transmittal of the project proposal, a conference between and among
the community members and NCIP representative/s shall be called in order
to allow the latter to present the following:
a. The purpose/s
b. Parameters
c. Methodologies
d. Materials
e. Benefits that may be derived by the community from the research
activity
f. Data gathering tools
g. Research Work Plan
h. Related information on the intended research
Section 11.3. Community Decision-Making. The community shall be given
fifteen (15) days from the termination of the conference to make a decision
whether to accept or deny the proposal.
V. DISPUTE RESOLUTION/MANAGEMENT
VI. SANCTIONS
Section 16. Failure to comply with the terms and conditions of their
agreements and violation of any of the provisions of this Guidelines shall be
subject to the following sanctions without prejudice to the filing of criminal,
civil and administrative proceedings as the case maybe.
a. Violation by the IP community shall be penalized in accordance
with
the customary law of the community;
b. Violation committed by the Researcher shall constitute a ground
for the termination of the research activity. An order of termination shall be
issued by the Regional Director after due notice and hearing;
c. Violation committed by NCIP officers or employees shall
subject him/her to administrative liability.
The communities shall provide copies of any and all researches and
documentations, approved by them and/or published with their consent,
pertaining to them and/or conducted within their ancestral domain, to the
appropriate NCIP Regional or Provincial Office and to the Central office, thru
the OPPR-Research Center.
The said copies shall be submitted within thirty (30) days from the validation
and approval by the community.
The community covered shall likewise maintain its own Registry of any and all
researches on
IKSP and CL conducted within and affecting their ancestral domain.
The OPPR, in coordination with LAO, shall provide the procedures and
guidelines by which these Registries shall be maintained by the community
concerned.
The OPPR shall likewise devise the guidelines regarding the use of the research
materials and/or works and materials derived therefrom, provided that the
right of the community as to the publications of said researches,
documentations, works and/or materials are respected. The intellectual
property rights of its owner and/or its author shall be of paramount
consideration in its publication and/or use by the NCIP.
They shall have joint rights to all works and materials resulting from such
research, whether or not the same is published or communicated in any
medium.
Section 20. Saving Clause. This Guidelines will not in any manner adversely
affect the rights and benefits of the community under other conventions,
recommendations, international treaties, national laws, awards, customs and
agreements.
Section 21. Separability Clause. If any provision of this Guidelines or the
application of such provision to any circumstances is held invalid, other
provisions shall not be affected thereby.
Section 22. Effectivity. This Administrative Order shall take effect fifteen (15)
days upon its publication in a newspaper of general circulation and registration
at the UP Administrative Register, UP Law Center, Diliman, Quezon City,
Philippines.
ARTICLE I OVERVIEW
Article XIII (Social Justice and Human Rights), Section 15 of the Constitution
defines People's organizations as bona fide associations of citizens with
demonstrated capacity to promote the public interest and with identifiable
leadership, membership, and structure. It further provides that the State shall
respect the role of independent people's organizations to enable the people to
pursue and protect, within the democratic framework, their legitimate and
collective interests and aspirations through peaceful and lawful means. Section
16 provides that the right of the people and their organizations to effective and
reasonable participation at all levels of social, political, and economic decision-
making shall not be abridged. The State shall, by law, facilitate the
establishment of adequate consultation mechanisms.
Republic Act No. 8371 (RA 8371) otherwise known as the Indigenous Peoples
Rights Act (IPRA) of 1997 enumerates provisions on Rights to Ancestral
Domains (Chapter III), Self- Governance and Empowerment (Chapter IV), Social
Justice and Human Rights (Chapter V), and Cultural Integrity (Chapter VI) in
order to implement the promotion of the political, economic and cultural rights
of the Indigenous Cultural Communities/Indigenous Peoples (ICCs/IPs);
Chapter II, Section 3 (n) of RA 8371, on the other hand, defines people’s
organizations as private, non-profit voluntary organizations of members of
ICCs/IPs which are accepted as representatives of such ICCs/IPs.
Chapter IV, Section 16 of RA 8371 provides that ICCs/IPs have the right to
participate fully, if they so choose, at all levels of decision-making in matters
which may affect their rights, lives, and destinies through procedures
determined by them as well as to maintain and develop their own IPS. Section
1, Part I, Rule IV (Right to Self-Governance and Empowerment) of the Rules
and Regulations Implementing the IPRA of 1997 (IRR) provides that the
ICCs/IPs, in coordination with the Department of the Interior and Local
Government, shall formulate measures to ensure the following: (a) the
sociopolitical structures, systems and institutions of ICCs/IPs are strengthened;
(b) the indigenous structures, systems, and institutions are not supplanted
by other forms of non-indigenous governance; and/or (c) mechanisms that
allow the interfacing of indigenous systems of governance with the national
systems are established.
Section 6. In addition to the definition of terms in the IPRA and its IRR, the
following terms, as used in this Guidelines, are defined as follows:
a. Indigenous Political Structures. It refers to organizational and
cultural leadership systems, institutions, relationships, patterns and processes
for decision-making and participation, identified and accepted by ICCs/IPs. The
IPS shall be recognized as the highest governing body with the IPO as its
technical arm;
b. Indigenous Elder/Leader- Indigenous elders/leaders emerge from
the dynamics of customary laws and practices; they evolve from a lifestyle of
conscious assertion and practice of traditional values and beliefs. Hence, they
are recognized authority on conflict resolution and peace-building processes,
on spiritual practices, rituals and ceremonials and by doing so; they possess the
attributes of wisdom and integrity. They lead and assist the community in
decision-making processes aimed at protecting and promoting the sustainable
development of their ancestral domains;
c. Registration. It is the operative act of granting juridical personality
to members of ICCs/IPs who organized themselves as independent IPOs which
is accepted as their representative as evidenced by a Certificate of
Registration
(CoR);
d. Resettled ICCs/IPs. It refers to ICCs/IPs living outside their
ancestral domain areas by reason of internal displacement due to armed
conflict, violence, extreme natural disasters or government projects (e.g hydro-
electric dams);
validated by the IPS in accordance with their own processes, and if found to
be valid, shall be endorsed to the National Commission on Indigenous Peoples
(NCIP) for confirmation and recording purposes;
20. Other traditional roles or functions analogous to the foregoing.
ARTICLE IV
Section 10. Confirmation, How Initiated. The confirmation maybe through the
initiative of the concerned Commissioner, the Regional Office or the concerned
IPS. In the two former cases, it shall be based on data provided by the
ADSDPP, Certificate of Ancestral Domain Title/Certificate of Ancestral Land
Title (CADT/CALT), FPIC, Certificates of Confirmation(COC) of Tribal
Membership and other valid sources of information or based on the process
of verification and validation provided in Section 16 hereof.
If the request for Confirmation by the Commission is upon the initiative of the
Regional Office, the same shall be endorsed by Regional Director (RD) with the
concurrence of the Commissioner from the Ethnographic Region. The
endorsement must include all pertinent data and information related thereto.
Section 11. The affirmative action shall be in the form of an En Banc Resolution
and the consequent COC to be signed by the Chairperson. A record of the
same shall be maintained and periodically updated by the Office on
Empowerment and Human Rights (OEHR).
Section 12. The following documents shall be required for the processing of
the Confirmation of IPS:
REPUBLIC ACT NO. 8371
151
THE INDIGENOUS PEOPLE RIGHTS ACT OF 1997
1. A Genealogical Survey;
2. Written accounts not limited to customs and traditions including
the interfaced customary practices on the following:
2.a Social organization- a profile of the IPS including information
on traditional and emerging elders/leaders; norms and social
stratification based on access to prestige and power; succession
(birthright); the leadership structure including the roles and functions of
the elders/leaders of the IPS;
2.b Basic social processes:
2.b.1. Dispute resolution and conflict management;
2.b.2. Consensus-building and decision-making processes towards
cooperation, unity and harmony;
2.b.3. Mutual help and defense systems;
2.b.4. Specialized functions in relation to observance of rituals.
2.c Access to resources:
2.c.1. Applicable community imperatives in accordance with
customary law as well as on the access and benefit-sharing
agreements/wealth management on resources;
2.c.2. Monitoring and evaluation as well as indicators on
sustainable development of resources;
2.c.3. Role of women in the sustainable development of the
domain.
3. Written and verified oral accounts of customs and traditions on
governance system and how these have responded to the changing
sociopolitical order; and
4. Other relevant anthropological/historical data.
Section 13. Application for Confirmation by the IPS and IPO Registration. The
following shall be the processes for confirmation and registration:
a. General requirement. The application for confirmation initiated by
the IPS itself shall be filed by the elders/leaders with the nearest NCIP
Provincial Office (PO) or the Community Service Center (CSC) in the absence of
a Provincial Office, supported by the requirements provided in Section 12
hereof.
In the case of registration of IPOs, it shall be filed by the IPS or the IPO
under its direction with the nearest NCIP PO or CSC;
Section 15. Where to file Application. Filing of the application registration shall
be made with nearest Provincial Office or Community Service Center in the
absence of a Provincial Office. The authorized representative shall submit three
(3) complete and duly accomplished sets, one (1) original and two (2) duplicate
copies. Copies of the application shall be for the applicant IPs, the concerned
CSC, and the OEHR for database and monitoring.
Section 16. Verification and Validation. The verification and validation shall be
conducted in the following manner:
1. The application for confirmation of IPS and/or registration of IPO
shall be submitted to the PO or CSC, which shall immediately furnish a copy to
the Regional Office. It shall conduct an evaluation of all submitted
requirements within ten (10) days upon receipt of the application. The
evaluation is to be conducted by gathering secondary data, interviews or other
means with the applicant leaders/elders of the IPS and other key informants.
The evaluation shall serve as basis for an assessment of the authenticity of the
application and/or for requesting additional requirements and other relevant
information to be provided by the applicant. If assessed to be authentic, the
applicant, upon receipt of the assessment shall, with the assistance of NCIP,
complete all relevant information. If found to be dubious or fraudulent, the
NCIP shall deny the application and give notice with an explanation of the basis
to the applicant.
2. If necessary, the evaluation shall be followed by the conduct of
fieldbased verification by the Verification and Validation Team (VVT), which
shall be constituted by the Provincial Office or CSC Head. The
verification/validation shall be undertaken within fifteen (15) days;
ARTICLE V
Section 19. The registration of the IPO with the NCIP confers to it a juridical
personality to represent the ICCs/IPs in pursuing and securing their collective
rights over their ancestral domains.
ARTICLE VI
Section 22. Subject to the consent of the IPS and in accordance with the
internal rules of the IPO, if the IPO voluntarily dissolves itself and funds were
used/disbursed by the IPO, a personal oath administered by the NCIP stating
that they shall personally answer for any outstanding obligation shall be
undertaken. The oath shall be submitted to the NCIP and to the IPS. Further,
the IPO shall also submit the latest audited financial statement before they
take their oath.
Section 23. Complaints against the IPO or any of its representatives shall be
resolved in accordance with traditional conflict mechanism systems. If
customary mechanisms are exhausted and the conflict/dispute remains
unresolved, the aggrieved party may elevate the same to the NCIP.
ARTICLE VIII
Section 24. Revitalization and Strengthening of IPS. The NCIP, in its programs
such as the delineation and titling of ancestral domains and the formulation of
ADSDPP, FPIC and the Exercise of Priority Rights and other processes, shall
prioritize the revitalization or strengthening of the IPS. If the IPS decides to
establish the IPOs, the NCIP Regional Office/Provincial Office/CSC shall assist
the ICCs/IPs to enable them to comply with the requirements as provided in
this Guidelines for the filing of the petition for confirmation and/or registration.
Section 25. Database. The NCIP, through the Regional Offices, OEHR and Office
on Policy, Planning and Research, shall establish their own mechanics of
creating a national database for IPS and registered IPOs. It shall also ensure an
effective tracking, releasing, controlling and filing of data at the Central Office.
Section 26. Training and Technical Assistance. The NCIP shall conduct or
facilitate training for its staff who will form part of the VVT as well as provide
technical assistance for the empowerment of the IPOs. The Regional Offices
shall include this program in their annual work and financial plans.
Section 27. Monitoring and Evaluation Mechanisms. The OEHR and the
Regional Offices shall closely coordinate to establish a quarterly monitoring and
evaluation mechanism for the implementation and enhancement of this
Guidelines. The Regional, Provincial Offices and CSC shall document, through
conduct of meetings and workshops, the process flow of verification and
validation. They shall maintain databases and logbooks of all applications
received, endorsed and approved including documentation and recording of
interviews, questions asked and responses made by the interviewees. All this
information shall be submitted semi-annually to the OEHR every year
commencing six (6) months from the effectivity of this Guidelines.
ARTICLE X FINAL PROVISIONS
Section 28. Funding. The NCIP shall appropriate funds to sustain the operations
and effective implementation of this Guidelines.
Section 30. Effectivity. This Administrative Order shall take effect fifteen (15)
days after its last publication in a newspaper of general circulation or
registration in the Office of the National Administrative Registrar, U.P. Law
Center, Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines.
Pursuant to Sections 44 (m), 46(a), 57, 58, 59, and 7 of R.A. 8371, otherwise
known as the Indigenous Peoples Rights Act of 1997, and other related
provisions, the following guidelines are hereby promulgated in lieu of
NCIP Administrative Order No. 01, Series of 2006, as follows:
Section 2. Objectives.
a. Ensure genuine exercise by Indigenous Cultural
Communities/Indigenous Peoples (ICCs/IPs) of their right to Free and Prior
Informed Consent (FPIC), whenever applicable;
b. Protect the rights of ICCs/IPs in the introduction and
implementation of plans, programs, projects, activities and other undertakings
that will affect them and their ancestral domains to ensure their economic,
social and cultural well-being;
c. Provide, and ensure compliance with the procedure and the
standards in the conduct of Field-Based Investigation (FBI) and FPIC process,
payment of fees, compensation for damages, execution of Memorandum of
Agreements, observance of corporate social responsibility; and imposition of
sanctions for the commission of prohibited acts and omissions as hereinafter
provided;
REPUBLIC ACT NO. 8371
159
THE INDIGENOUS PEOPLE RIGHTS ACT OF 1997
Section 5. Definition of Terms. In addition to the terms defined under IPRA and
its IRR, the following are defined thus:
a. Ancestral Domain Sustainable Development & Protection
Plan (ADSDPP). Refers to the consolidation of the plans of ICCs/IPs within an
ancestral domain for the sustainable management and development of their
land and natural resources as well as the development of human and cultural
resources based on their indigenous knowledge systems and practices.
b. Area Affected. It refers to area/s in the ancestral domain which
will be overlapped or affected by the proposed plan, program, project or
objective information or opinion, that will help the ICCs/IPs to reach a sensible,
intelligent and well-informed decision.
l. Non-Extractive and/or Small Scale Activities. These are the
activities enumerated in Section 24 of this Guidelines.
m. Resolution of Consent. It refers to the written resolution adopted
by the affected ICCs/IPs by themselves or through their duly
authorized elders/leaders expressing their acceptance of the plan, program,
project or activity.
n. Resolution of Non-Consent. It refers to the written resolution
adopted by the affected ICCs/IPs by themselves or through their duly
authorized elders/leaders expressing their non-acceptance of the plan,
program, project or activity and the reasons therefor.
In case the project is within two (2) or more regions, the endorsement or
application shall be transmitted to the Director of the Ancestral Domains Office
(ADO) who shall decide which Regional Office shall take the lead in
facilitating the appropriate and applicable process taking into consideration the
extent of the effect and the size of the areas that will be affected. (a7)
The ADO, in consultation with field offices, shall craft the standard and
appropriate checklist for the above purpose.
At any time, the FBI/FPIC Team may require additional but pertinent
document/s from the applicant, e.g EIS from the DENR, if available.
Section 8. Constitution and Composition of the FBI Team. The FBI Team shall
be constituted, by the Regional Director, by way of Memorandum, within ten
(10) days from approval of this Guidelines, to be composed of the following:
1) The Community Development Officer (CDO), as Team Leader;
2) The FBI Provincial Focal Person;
3) One (1) from the Community Service Center (CSC); and
4) Two (2) IP elders/leaders identified by the CSC
The composition of the team may be revised or enhanced upon the agreement
of the FBI team as the need arises in order to cope with existing work
conditions or circumstances, with the approval of the Regional Director.
Section 9. Duties and Functions of the FBI Team. The duties and functions of
the FBI team are:
1. Consult with the AD representatives if applicable;
Upon receipt of the information or report, the Regional Director shall order the
suspension of the process with notice to the applicant. The order shall also
direct the applicant to show cause, within a non-extendible period of ten (10)
days from receipt, why the application should not be deemed abandoned for
lack or loss of interest. If after the lapse of ten (10) days from receipt of the
Order, as evidenced by a proof of receipt, and without justifiable reason
formally communicated to the Regional Director, the latter shall declare the
application cancelled and shall return the application to the endorsing
regulatory agency or the applicant, as the case may be. Thereafter, other
applications, if any, may be given due course.
Failure on the part of the applicant to pay the FBI/FPIC fee or comply with the
requirements as agreed upon during the Pre-FBI/Pre-FPIC conference/s shall
likewise result in suspension or cancellation as provided in the preceding
paragraph.
Section 12. Work and Financial Plan (WFP) for FBI/FPIC. The WFP shall be
agreed upon by the applicant, the concerned ICCs/IP representatives, and
NCIP during the Pre-FBI/Pre-FPIC Conference. It shall include, among others,
the estimated cost of: (a) Food and snacks, lodging and transportation
expenses of those who will be actually involved in the FBI process; (b)
Documenting the FBI activities i.e. photo and/or video, cassette recording and
development, reproduction of documents; and (c) Others as may be agreed
by all the parties during the Pre-FBI/Pre-FPIC conference.
Section 13. Commencement and Conduct of the FBI. The Team shall
commence the FBI within ten (10) days from date of deposit/payment of the
FBI fee and must be completed within ten (10) working days from actual
commencement except when delayed by reason of fortuitous event or force
majeure.
The FBI Team shall submit its report in accordance with Section 9 of this
Guidelines. Should it be apparent from the report that an AD shall be affected
by the proposed project, the RD shall immediately mobilize the FPIC team,
otherwise, a CNO shall be issued pursuant to Section 15 of this Guidelines.
Section 14. Contents of the Field-Based Investigation Report. The FBI report
must contain a narrative of what transpired during the ground or field
investigation; findings and recommendations; and the pertinent attachments,
in a standard pro forma form to be devised by ADO after consultation with field
offices. The report shall be signed, under oath, by the team leader and
members.
Section 16. The FPIC Team. The FPIC Team in each province with provincial
office, to be constituted by the Regional Director, shall be composed of the
following:
1) The Provincial Officer, as Team Leader;
2) The Provincial Legal Officer;
3) One (1) Engineer from the Provincial or Regional Office,;
4) The head of the FBI Team; and
5) Two (2) IP elders/leaders selected by the community in the
first assembly.
Section 17. Duties and Functions of the FPIC Team. The FPIC Team shall
perform the following functions:
a. Convene, with prior notice, the First general assembly to validate
the following: (1) FBI Report; (2) Identity of the IP Elders and Leaders; (3)
Decision-Making Process; (4) Census of IPs/Migrant IPs; (5) Area affected; (6)
Existence of boundary conflict with other ADs;
b. Document Conflict Resolution Mechanism and facilitate the
conduct of the same by the chosen/selected Elders/Leaders, should
there be any dispute/conflict to be resolved;
c. Facilitate and document the proceedings of the assembly and be
responsible for the interpretation, translation, clarification, or elaboration of
matters discussed or taken up;
d. Orient the participants on the pertinent provisions of IPRA at all
stages and activities;
e. Present the agreed WFP during the assembly;
f. Invite the appropriate independent experts, if available, to give
their
opinions on any aspect of the project;
g. Should the ICC/IP agree to the activity, help draft the Resolution of
Consent and the MOA, or Resolution of Non-Consent should the ICCs/IPs reject
the proposal;
h. Make an accounting, in accordance with generally accepted
accounting and auditing rules, of all monies and properties received in relation
to the conduct of the FPIC; and
The ADO shall craft the appropriate pro forma form for FPIC Reports after
consultation with field offices.
Section 18. The Regional Review Team (RRT); Composition; Functions. There
shall be a Regional Review Team (RRT) to be constituted by the Regional
Director, composed of the TMSD Chief, Regional Attorney and the duly
designated Regional FPIC Focal Person. The RRT leader may either be the TMSD
or the Regional Attorney, at the option of the Regional Director.
Section 19. Extractive/ Intrusive/ Large Scale. The following plans, projects,
programs, and activities are considered large scale/extractive/intrusive:
a. Exploration, development, exploitation, utilization of land,
energy, mineral, forest, water, marine, air, and other natural resources
requiring permits, licenses, lease, contracts, concession, or agreements
e.g productionsharing agreement, from the appropriate national or local
government agencies, including feasibility studies related thereto;
Section 20. Who Shall Exercise the Right to FPIC. All ICCs/IPs who are owners
of the ancestral domain have the right to exercise FPIC on/for any of the
activities listed in the immediately preceding section; Provided, that in case the
AD is owned by two (2) or more ICC/IP sub-groups, or under a unified claim,
provisions of their duly executed and validly existing agreement shall be
followed, if any, otherwise, all ICCs/IPs sub- groups, tribes shall all participate
Unless specifically stated in the MOA, separate exercise of the right to FPIC
shall be for each major phase of the proposed activity such as Exploration;
Operation or Development; Contracting of operator; and the like.
Section 21. Pre-FPIC Conference. The following shall be taken up, acted
upon or accomplished during the Pre-FPIC Conference: a) The FBI
Report; b) Finalization and approval of WFP; c) Deposit/Remittance of FPIC
Fee; d) Setting of schedules and tasking; e) Preparation of Work Order; f)
Orientation on the FPIC process, protocols, and prohibited acts; g)
Arrangements for the payment of the bond; h) Submission by the applicant of
an undertaking, written in a language spoken and understood by the
community concerned, that it shall commit itself to full disclosure of records
and information relevant to the plan, program, project or activity, that
would allow the community full access to records, documents, material
information and facilities pertinent to the same; i) Submission by the
applicant of an Environmental and Socio-cultural Impact Statement, detailing
all the possible impact of the plan, program, project or activity upon the
ecological, economic, social and cultural aspect of the community as a whole.
Such document shall clearly indicate how adverse effects may be avoided,
mitigated and/or addressed; j) Opinions of invited experts, if any; and k) Others
as may be required by the FPIC team or as may have been surfaced during the
conduct of the FBI.
Section 22. Conduct of Community Assemblies and Other Activities. Two (2)
community assemblies, known as First and Second Community Assembly,
respectively, shall be held.
The First Community Assembly shall be held as soon as the proponent remits or
pays the FPIC Fee to the Regional Office and the corresponding amount is
released to the concerned NCIP Provincial Office or Service Center for the
purpose. It shall be held on a date and strategic place within the AD after the
following are complied with by the FPIC team:
1. Formal notice to the Regional Director with his/her approval of the
date and place secured;
2. Posting of written notices seven (7) days before the activity in
conspicuous places in and around the concerned ICC/IP Community, i.e.
the Community Tribal and/or Barangay Hall/s;
3. Personal service of formal notices to the AD representatives as
appearing in the Certificate of Ancestral Domain Title (CADT) Recognition
Book or ADSDPP Book, if available, seven (7) days before the activity;
4. Service of formal notice to the representative of the
proponent/locator;
5. Service of formal notice to the concerned LGU/s Chief
Executive/s, concerned NGOs and invited experts, if any; and
6. Service of notice to the Provincial Consultative Body (PCB), if
existent.
During this assembly, the following matters shall be taken-up, discussed and/or
acted upon:
a) Orientation on IPRA and the FPIC process;
b) Validation FBI report and the area/s affected;
c) The Census of IPs/Migrant IPs/Non-IPs;
d) Identification and validation of I Elders and Leaders;
e) Determination of the Decision-making or consensus-building
process/es;
f) Consensus on the involvement of NGOs/CSOs;
g) Validation of the members of the FPIC Team representing the
community;
h) Presentation of the agreed WFP;
i) Option, selection and invitation of independent expert/s to
conduct
EIA or give their expert opinions;
j) Arrangements for conflict/dispute resolution mechanisms by the
chosen/elected IP Elders/Leaders;
k) Date and place of Second community assembly; and
The Second Community Assembly shall be held on a date and place within the
AD decided upon during the First community assembly. In this assembly, the
following shall be taken up or undertaken:
1. Presentation by the applicant of the plan, program, project or
activity that it seeks to undertake. The presentation shall include: a) The
Operation Plan and the scope and extent of the proposal; b) The cost and
benefits of the proposal to the ICC/IP and their ancestral domains; c) The
perceived disadvantages or adverse effects to th community; and d) The
measures adopted by the applicant to avoid or mitigate these;
2. Sharing by an expert/s, if engaged or invited, to include
presentation of the result of the EIA if available, expert opinion/s
on any aspect, recommendation/s, and identification of affected area/s;
3. Remarks or inputs of other stakeholders e.g. concerned NGAs,
LGUs, NGO, IPO;
4. Open forum to give the ICCs/IPs the chance to ask questions and
to speak out their concerns relative to the presentations and the project; and
5. Other important matters that are agreed upon during the
assembly.
Towards the end of the Second community assembly, the ICCs/IPs shall be left
alone to agree on their decision-making/consensus-building schedules and
when to come out with their decision. This activity must not be undertaken less
than ten (10) days from the date of the Second community assembly and must
be completed within a reasonable time but not more than two (2) months
thereafter.
When the ICCs/IPs are already ready with their decision or consensus, the duly
authorized Community Elders/Leaders shall communicate to the FPIC Team
such consensus. If it appears to be favorable, the FPIC Team shall immediately
notify the proponent and the community representatives for the negotiation of
the terms and conditions that shall be embodied in the MOA. Once the parties
agree on the terms and conditions, the MOA is forthwith drafted in the
vernacular and English or vice versa. Thereafter, a validation assembly shall be
convened within the AD, at which time the MOA provisions shall be explained
to the community by the FPIC Team in a language that they speak and
understand. After having understood the contents and implications of the
MOA, the community may confirm the same. After confirmation, the same
shall be forthwith signed by the authorized signatories of both parties. The
negotiation of the terms and conditions and the signing by the duly
authorized representatives of the proponent and the ICCs/IPs must be done
within the AD. Along with the finalization of the MOA, the Resolution of
Consent of the community shall also be prepared, signed and released.
The FPIC Team shall facilitate the conduct of, and document all,
proceedings/activities under this section and shall be responsible for the
translation, interpretation, clarification, or elaboration of matters taken up, and
the explanation of pertinent provisions of IPRA, to the best of their personal
knowledge and ability. Views, pro and con, shall be summarized and
documented as accurately as possible. The FPIC team may also direct any
participant in the assembly to submit written comments or objections which
must be received by the FPIC Team within a non- extendible period of three
(3) working days, to form part of its final report.
The FPIC process under this Section requires negotiation between the
community, represented by its Council of Elders/Leaders, and the applicant,
facilitated by the FPIC Team. There shall be two (2) separate meetings with
the elders/leaders which are herein referred to as the First meeting and the
Decision meeting. In the First meeting, the applicant will be given sufficient
time to present and clarify its proposal. The presentation must include the
operation plan, the scope and extent of the activity, the cost and benefits to
the ICC/IP and their ancestral domains, perceived disadvantages or adverse
effects to the community, and measures adopted by the applicant to avoid or
mitigate these. In said meeting, the ICCs/IPs shall prepare a schedule for their
decision-making/consensus-building which must start not less than ten (10)
days from the first meeting and completed not more than Thirty (30) days
thereafter. The First meeting shall be followed by the consensus-building
period by and among the council of elders/leaders. They will also use this
period to consult with their constituency in accordance with their customary
mechanisms. After they are able to arrive at a consensus within the time frame
they decided, they shall inform the FPIC Team of such consensus. If the
decision/consensus is favorable, the Team shall forthwith convene the Decision
meeting, with notice to the concerned parties. During this meeting, the council
of elders/leaders will formally proclaim their decision and the parties shall
proceed to negotiate and finalize the terms and conditions of the MOA and
thereafter consummate the same.
Section 25. Excluded Areas. The following areas are excluded from any activity
except for the exclusive purposes for which they are identified:
a. Sacred grounds and burial sites of indigenous communities;
b. Identified international and local cultural and heritage sites;
c. Critical areas identified or reserved by the ICCs/IPs for special
purposes; and
d. Other areas specifically identified by ICCs/IPs in their ADSDPP.
Section 26. Submission of Report. Where the ICCs/IPs gave their consent in
accordance with the foregoing provisions, The FPIC Team shall submit a formal
report with recommendation/s, systematically prepared with pertinent and
legible annexes, signed by the team leader and members under oath to the
REPUBLIC ACT NO. 8371
176
THE INDIGENOUS PEOPLE RIGHTS ACT OF 1997
In cases where EIA, EIS and/or ECC are required by the regulatory agency, and
the same are not available at the time of the FPIC Process, the
proponent/applicant shall execute an undertaking that should the same
become available, the proponent/applicant shall furnish NCIP a copy of the
same, and undergo the FPIC process in areas included in said EIA, EIS and/or
ECC as affected areas which were not included in the previously determined
affected area/s.
In case of non-consent, the FPIC Team shall report the same to the Regional
Director, and the latter shall forthwith inform the proponent, copy furnished
the concerned Commissioner/s and the ADO.
If the ICCs/IPs manifests their rejection of the plan, program, project or activity,
in any written form signed by the members of the community and their
elders/leaders before or during the FBI, the same shall be received by the FBI
team and the Regional Director shall be notified of the same. Upon receipt
of the notice, the Regional Director shall order the conduct of a validation
assembly similar to a consensus- building activity as provided for in this rules to
validate the rejection. However, if the rejection is received or made after the
FBI, the matter shall be tackled in the mandatory activity on consensus-
building.
Section 28. RRT Review. After receipt of the report, the Regional Director
shall direct the RRT to review the same within five (5) days. Should the review
report be favorable, and the Director finds nothing wrong with the same, he
shall endorse the record of the FPIC Process undertaken, together with his
recommendation/s to the ADO for appropriate action, otherwise he may direct
appropriate action by the RRT or the FPIC Team before he makes his
endorsement to the ADO.
Section 29. Inaction. The inaction of the applicant within six (6) months from
the last FPIC activity, without justifiable reason, shall be a ground for a
termination of the FPIC process to be declared by the Regional Director
with notice to the applicant.
Section 32. Contents of MOA. The MOA shall include, but shall not be
limited to, the following:
a. Detailed benefit-sharing provisions in accordance with rules
and
regulations
[i.e. not less than 1% royalty under mining act];
b. Development projects based on the development priorities
of the
community;
c. Monitoring of the implementation MOA to be
implemented by NCIP in partnership with LGUs and CSOs. This
undertaking shall be paid for by the company;
d. Mitigation and resettlement plans for potential risks;
e. Redress mechanisms;
f. Clause on the non-transferability of the MOA;
g. Clause for renegotiation of the economic provisions;
h. Whether the concerned ICCs/IPs shall require another FPIC
to be conducted in case of merger, reorganization, transfer of rights,
acquisition by another entity, or joint venture;
i. List of responsibilities of the company and the affected
community j.
Inclusive dates/duration of agreement;
k. Other than what has already been granted by law, the
benefits to be derived by the host ICC/IPs indicating the type of
Section 33. Signatories to the MOA. The signatories of the MOA shall be:
a. Elders/leaders or their alternates who have been
identified
during the validation and authorized by the community to sign;
b. For corporations, partnerships or single proprietorship
entities, the
authorized officers, representatives, or partners per Board Resolution; and
c. The Chairperson shall sign the MOA in behalf of the NCIP as
Third Party. For projects where the Regional Director is authorized by
this Guidelines to issue the corresponding certification precondition, the
MOA shall be signed by him/her in behalf of the NCIP as Third Party.
Section 34. MOA Signing. The signing of the MOA shall be done within the
affected ancestral domain by those duly authorized, during a general assembly
called for the purpose, after its contents is fully read aloud and explained by
the FPIC Team, and understood and affirmed by the community. Should there
be need for any change/s, the FPIC team shall make the appropriate revision
or amendment to the satisfaction of the community assembly.
Section 35. Final Review of the MOA by the Legal Affairs Office. The MOA shall
be reviewed by the Legal Affairs Office (LAO) prior to the endorsement of the
FPIC report by ADO to the Commission. The legal advisory of the LAO shall form
part of the FPIC Report of ADO.
In cases where the Regional Director is authorized to issue the CP, the MOA
shall be reviewed by the Regional Legal Officer or any Legal Officer who has
not participated in any stage of the FPIC Process.
Section 41. Foreign Funded Project Undertaken in Cooperation with the NCIP.
NCIP may enter into cooperation with foreign funding agencies for projects
involving delivery of basic services or for the promotion of economic and
sustainable development, in which case, the requirements of FPIC may be
dispensed with and that only validation under the preceding sections of this
Guidelines may suffice. Projects undertaken by international funding agencies
or institutions by themselves or in cooperation with non-government
organizations or institutions shall, however, be subject to the appropriate FPIC
process as provided in the applicable provisions of this Guidelines or other
pertinent NCIP Guidelines.
Even if an activity is covered under Sections 39, 40, 41, and 42, the NCIP may
exercise its injunctive powers upon a written complaint of any member of the
affected community to enjoin the conduct or continued implementation of
the program, project, plan or activity in order to safeguard the rights and
interests of the community. (34a)
suitable to provide for their present needs and future development; hence, the
said ICCs/IPs shall not be treated as migrants and can likewise exercise their
right to FPIC.
Section 47. FPIC Rights of Resettled, Displaced and Relocated IPs as well as
Migrant IPs Living in Co-existence with the Original IPs within the Domain. In a
particular ICC/IP community where there exists resettled, displaced and
relocated IPs or migrant IPs mingled or in co-existence with the owners of the
AD, the right to FPIC of the resettled, displaced and relocated or migrant
IPs will depend on the custom, practice or tradition of the owners of the
AD allowing or disallowing the exercise thereof. Whether allowed or not
allowed by the owners of the AD to participate in the FPIC proceedings, they
shall likewise be entitled to the benefits by virtue of the MOA and to
compensation for damages, loss or injury to them or their properties. The
obligation to compensate the resettled, displaced and relocated IPs or migrant
IPs of what is rightfully due them shall be recognized by the applicant in
writing either in the MOA or in a separate undertaking made as an integral part
of the MOA. (38)
Section 48. Small Scale Quarry Approved by the Local Government Unit
(LGU). The CP for small-scale quarries, whose permits are issued by Local
Government Units (LGUs) shall be issued by the concerned Regional Director
with the concurrence of the concerned Regional Ethnographic Commissioner
and affirmation by the NCIP Chairman. A copy of the CP shall be furnished
to ADO, the concerned Provincial Officer or CSC Head, as the case may be.
Section 50. Steps in the Declaration of EPR by the ICCs/IPs. In the declaration
of the EPR by a particular ICC/IP community, the following must be observed:
1. Community Assembly. A community assembly of all members of
the concerned ICC/IP community shall be held, at the community’s own
initiative and expense, with notice to NCIP.
Section 51. Validation of the EPR Declaration and Validating Team. The
validation of the declaration of EPR shall be done by a Validating Team
to be constituted by the Regional Director from among personnel of the
appropriate Community Service Center, Provincial Office and/or Regional
Office, which must not be more than five (5) persons. The Validating Team
shall use as its reference and/or do the following, among others:
a. CADT Claimbook and/or ADSDPP record, if existing. In the
absence thereof, the barangay census or IP census conducted by the
NCIP, and other official documents produced in the performance of
NCIP’s mandate;
b. AD Profile, if existing, otherwise the team shall assist
community in
making one;
c. Verify and validate the community resolution, the
declaration, and
other pertinent data/information;
d. Get a copy and validate the Community EPR plan.
e. Verify and validate the capability of the community to
undertake the
activity which is the object of their EPR or their capacity to engage a
qualified partner.
Section 54. Report of the Validating Team. The report of the Validation
Team, which shall be under oath, must include an executive summary
with recommendations. It shall then be submitted to the Regional Director
within fifteen (15) days from the termination of the validation period, who shall
immediately refer the same to the RRT for review within three (3) working
days. After receipt of the RRT review report, the Regional Director shall
take such appropriate action he deems necessary, otherwise, he shall
forthwith make a transmittal of the entire record, with his/her own
recommendations, to the ADO Director who, after receipt, shall
immediately request the LAO to issue legal opinion and furnish the
concerned Commissioner a copy of the executive summary. After receiving
the legal opinion, the ADO Director shall request for inclusion of the same in
the agenda of the CEB for its next en banc session, through the Executive
Director.
Section 55. Action by the CEB. After appropriate deliberation, the CEB may
decide to issue the formal acknowledgment of EPR and/or direct otherwise,
as it deems fit. Should it decide to grant the formal acknowledgment, the
same shall be embodied in an En Banc Resolution and the corresponding
Certification Precondition shall be issued accordingly. Should the CEB
decide not to confirm the EPR declaration, its denial and the grounds
thereof shall be embodied in an En Banc Resolution. All such actions shall
be transmitted by ADO to other appropriate government agencies, the
community, the partner if applicable, and the field office/s.
Section 59. Person Authorized to Manage. Only the duly organized, NCIP
registered, IPO of the concerned ICCs/IPs shall be authorized to receive and
manage the royalties. Protection of the royalties that are received by it shall be
provided in its by-laws and manual of operation, provided that, the same shall
be compliant, and not be contrary, to provisions of this Guidelines.
Section 62. Use of Royalty. The royalties must be used for programs and
projects that will redound to the well-being and benefit of the ICCs/IPs entitled
to it. It should have allocations for: Emergency concerns; Investments which
may be short, medium or long term; Livelihood and social development
projects which must be allocated not less than 30% of each and every
release; Education and training of members, basic or professional;
Capitalization for cooperative development; Credit facility; Salaries or wages
of persons engaged to perform professional services; Mutual assistance, and
the like. It must never be used as payment for damages caused by the
proponent/company’s activities to the person and properties of an individual
member, as this is a distinct obligation of the company and not part of royalties
Section 64. Monitoring and Visitorial Powers. In the exercise of its mandate to
protect the well-being and promote the rights of ICCs/IPs, the NCIP may
direct financial and management audits of IPOs managing royalties and other
benefits or exercise its visitorial powers as provided for by law.
Section 65. Prohibited Acts. After the filing of the application and during
the period that the application is pending, any of the following acts or
omissions are hereby declared either as acts prejudicial to the interest of the
IP community in the attainment of their consent or acts in circumvention of
the intent of the law in requiring the free, prior and informed consent of
ICC/IP community and are therefore prohibited:
a. By the applicant:
1) Employment or use of force, threat, coercion, intimidation, at any
degree or in any manner, including those done by individuals or group of
persons acting for the applicant;
2) Bringing of firearm/s in the community during visits by the
applicant or group of persons acting for the applicant. When needed, armed
with the applicant and/or members of the affected community, with the
intention of unduly influencing the result of the FPIC process in favor of the
applicant; and
9. Demanding or receiving from the applicant, IP community, or
support institutions like NGOs, government agencies and institutions money,
or any gift, donation or other valuable thing outside the approved
work and financial and/or supplemental plan for the conduct of FBI and
FPIC processes. Any other acts or omission by NCIP officer or employee
punishable or prohibited under any existing laws, rules and regulations
governing public officers/employees.
c. By the IP Community or Member and/or Elders/Leaders
1) Solicitation and acceptance or receipt of gifts, money or other
valuable things from the applicant intended to unduly influence the outcome
of the FPIC process in favor of the applicant;
2) Consorting with the applicant or with any person connected to or
mediating for the latter intended to unduly influence the outcome of the FPIC
process in favor of the applicant;
3) Negotiating or mediating or transacting business with the
applicant without proper authority from the affected ICC/IP; and
4) Giving or promising to give his consent in consideration of
any offer, promise, future reward, privilege or benefit from the applicant
other than what has been provided for or explained by the applicant to the
Council of Elders or Leaders and community members during the
consultation meetings.
d. Other Prohibited Acts by NGOs/CSOs/GAs/LGUs & Other Groups
Undue influence or interference with the FPIC process or to the community,
either to the members, elders/leaders or their representatives,
exerted by representatives of NGOs or CSOs or GAs or local government
instrumentalities, including barangay officials and their functionaries, and
those made by other entities or groups with religious affiliations.
Section 66. Sanctions. Sanctions shall be imposed only after due notice and
after the parties are given the opportunity to be heard, as follows:
a) Grave Violations. Commission of any of the prohibited acts by
the applicant/s considered grave violations shall constitute a ground for the
non-issuance of the certificate applied for.
The violation is considered grave when the commission of the prohibited
act is intentional and has resulted to loss of life or serious damage to property
prohibited acts shall be filed with the concerned Regional Director, copy
furnished the FBI/FPIC Team leader. Within ten (10) days from receipt of the
complaint, the FBI/FPIC Team shall submit its answer thereto. The complaint
shall be resolved by the Regional Director within ten (10) days from receipt of
the answer or expiration of the period for filing thereof. The resolution shall
address the irregularity or in case of commission of prohibited acts,
recommend to the Commission to impose appropriate sanctions.
The filing of the administrative complaint shall not, as far as practicable, stop
the FPIC process or of the processing of the application unless the sanction
calls for it.
Section 70. Transmittal of Records and Comment. Upon the filing of the
petition, the Clerk of the Commission shall, within three (3) days, direct the
ADO to forward the records of the FPIC application to the Office of
the Clerk of the Commission or the Regional Director to forward the
CNO together with all accompanying documents within ten (10) days from
receipt of the directive. Within ten (10) days from receipt of a copy of the
petition, the concerned Regional Director may file a comment to the petition,
attaching therewith such evidence other than those included in the records of
the FPIC application indorsed to the Commission.
Section 74. Repealing Clause. This Administrative Order repeals NCIP AO-
01, Series of 2006. The provisions of other Circulars, Memoranda, and
Administrative Orders, issued by this Commission, inconsistent herewith
or contrary to the provisions hereof are hereby repealed or modified
accordingly.
Section 75. Effectivity. This Administrative Order shall take effect fifteen
(15) days after its last publication in a newspaper of general circulation
and registration in the Office of the National Administration Register, U.P.
Law Center, Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines.
Pursuant to Article II Section 22, Article XII Section 5, Article XIV Section 17
of the Philippine Constitution of 1987 and the provisions of RA 8371 and its
implementing rules and regulations, the National Commission on Indigenous
Peoples (NCIP) hereby adopts and promulgates the following Rules on
Delineation and Recognition of Ancestral Domains and Ancestral Lands
(ADs/ALs) of 2012.
He/She may request the Regional Director (RD) to provide him/her with a
substitute member, from among the personnel in the Regional Office.
The RRB shall review the PDT/CDT report and prepare and submit its findings
to the Regional Director.
Section 1. Proofs Required. Proof of Ancestral Domain Claims shall include the
testimony of elders or community under oath, and other documents directly
or indirectly attesting to the possession or occupation of the area since time
immemorial by such ICCs/IPs in the concept of owner/s which shall be any one
(1) of the following authentic documents:
a. Written accounts of the ICCs/IPs customs and traditions;
b. Written accounts of the ICCs/IPs political structure and institutions;
c. Pictures showing long term occupation such as those of old
improvements, burial grounds, sacred places and old villages;
d. Historical accounts, including pacts and agreements concerning
boundaries entered
into by the ICCs/IPs concerned with others ICCs/IPs;
e. Survey plans and indicative maps;
f. Anthropological data;
g. Genealogical data;
h. Pictures and descriptive histories of traditional communal
forests and hunting grounds;
i. Pictures and descriptive histories of traditional landmarks such as
mountains, rivers, creeks, ridges, hills, terraces and the like; or
j. Write-ups of names and places derived from the native dialect of the
community.
Section 3. Written Accounts. These are accounts in writing about the particular
ICCs/IPs, their customs and traditions, political structures and institutions,
other lifestyles or cultural expressions, which may include anthropological
data, etymology of names and places derived from the native dialect of
the community and such other records in writing containing a recitation
of the community’s history.
Section 6. Pictures. Pictures are still photographs depicting and illustrating the:
a. traditional landmarks such as mountains, rivers, creeks, lakes,
ridges, terraces, sacred places, hunting/ fishing grounds, and the traditional
use of resources with detailed description of their importance to the lives of
the claimants;
The pictures of the places and objects taken with the ICC representative/s in
the foreground or background to establish authenticity, describing in a label
what the picture depicts, identifying therein the date when it was taken as well
as the photographer.
Section 7. Census and List. For purposes of this Rules, census shall refer to
the process of coming up with the list of community members found in the
AD/AL without prejudice to the inclusion of the names of non-resident
members if available. The census may include the following:
a. migrant IPs residing within the ancestral domain/land, and,
b. non-IPs residing within the ancestral land/domain.
Section 5. Initial Review and Evaluation. The PDT or CDT, as the case may
be, shall review and evaluate all documents/proofs supporting each
application/petition including the attachments and other documents
required in Rule IV, Sections 1 and 2 to determine the sufficiency of the
application. They may conduct field validation to ascertain the due execution
and substance of the submitted documents, if deemed necessary. If found
sufficient, within ten (10) days from evaluation, the PDT/CDT shall transmit
a copy of the application/petition together with the pertinent attachments
to the Director of Land Management Bureau (LMB)and the concerned
Regional Executive Director (RED) of the DENR, pursuant to Section 53(f)of
IPRA, by registered mail with return card. The Ethnographic Commissioner shall
REPUBLIC ACT NO. 8371
213
THE INDIGENOUS PEOPLE RIGHTS ACT OF 1997
likewise be furnished copy of the same. If it is identified that there are other
government agencies that will be affected by the application, they shall also be
notified of the same.
If, upon initial review and evaluation, the application is found insufficient, the
applicant shall be directed to submit additional proofs, otherwise, no further
action shall be taken.
Section 6. Preparation of Work and Financial Plan (WFP). The WFP shall be
prepared by the PDT/CDT with the participation of the CADT/CALT applicant;
participating NGO/s recognized by the community, if any; concerned LGU; and
other partner agencies after the requirements in the preceding sections are
found to be sufficient. The participation, undertaking, and/or
counterparts and other agreements of the concerned community, partner
NGO/s, LGU/s, and other partner agencies shall be clearly stipulated in the
WFP. The WFP shall be endorsed by the concerned NCIP Regional Office to ADO
for review and evaluation. Thereafter, the WFP shall be returned to the
PDT/CDT for the signatures of the parties, duly noted by the Regional Director.
The signed WFP shall then be transmitted to Central Office for signing by the
ADO Director, FAO Director, concerned Ethnographic Commissioner and the
Chairman. Copies of the accomplished WFP shall be furnished to the
applicant, ADO, Finance and Administrative Office (FAO), Commission on
Audit (COA), RO, the Commission, thru the OED, and partner agencies, if any.
Section 7. Contents of Work and Financial Plan (WFP). The WFP shall contain
the following:
a. Names of the parties;
REPUBLIC ACT NO. 8371
214
THE INDIGENOUS PEOPLE RIGHTS ACT OF 1997
b. Date of preparation;
c. Specific location of the project;
d. Approximate total AD/AL area;
e. Estimated total IPs population/right holders;
f. Ethnic group/s living in the area;
g. Kind of application;
h. Brief description of the landscape of the area;
i. Status of the accomplished activities, if any;
j. Total amount needed to complete the project;
k. Initial amount already expended, if any;
l. Source/s of funds;
m. Specific activities and duration;
n. Physical output indicator for each activity;
o. Name, address and contact number/s of representatives of assistors,
if any;
p. Specific activities clearly indicating the counterparts of the
assistors or any support group/s; and,
q. Such other undertakings or agreements of the parties, if any.
The Notices shall specify the venue, date and time and shall be delivered
preferably by personal service, registered mail with return card, or other
modes of delivery most convenient and speedy to ensure receipt by the
addressee. The PDTs/CDTs shall keep a record of receipt of the same.
Notices written in the local dialect shall also be posted in conspicuous public
places within and adjacent to the AD/AL. It shall include information on the
Application/Petition and an invitation to attend the Information, Education
Such Notices shall also be sent and posted prior to the conduct of the
following activities:
a. Validation of documents by the community;
b. Ocular inspection;
c. Meetings for boundary conflict resolution;
d. Actual ground survey; and e. Map validation
Section 11. Data Gathering and Documentation. The PDT/CDT shall assist
the ICCs/IPs in the gathering of the testimony of elders/leaders, historical
The PDT/CDT shall secure a certified list of data or information affecting the
AD/AL applied for from the appropriate government agency/ies and private
institutions or persons, on the following:
A certified copy or list of any of the following data issued by the concerned
agency, shall be secured by the PDT/CDT, if the same affects/involves the
applied area:
a. resource use permits, grants and other instruments entered
into/ issued by the government through its agencies/ LGU;
b. proclamations, laws, orders, zoning ordinances, decisions of
courts and other tribunals involving the ancestral domain/ land
or portion thereof.
c. proof of ownership over land within the ancestral domain which has
been vested prior to the effectivity of IPRA;
d. public/ private agreements/ contracts entered into by ICCs/ IPs
involving transfer of rights over land, prior to the effectivity of IPRA;
e. institutions or entities having interest in the ancestral domain/ land
which may affect the ICC/IPs’ right to effectively exercise acts of ownership;
f. sketch maps, approved survey plans and/or other records to identify
boundaries or adjacent owners; and
g. applications for issuance of title or certification on fact of absence of
application.
At this stage, the identified working groups for the ADSDPP formulation
shall conduct a participatory baseline survey, focusing on the existing
population, natural resources, development projects, land use, sources of
livelihood, income and employment, education and other concerns. The
survey shall include the documentation of the ICCs/IPs culture or IKSPs and
historical accounts or inventory of documents relative to the sustainable
development and protection of the ancestral domain. It shall likewise include
the appraisal of the quality and quantity of existing natural resources in the
ancestral domain. The baseline survey shall target both secondary and/or
primary data with the aid of survey instruments and procedures.
The working group shall assess the data/information, identify and prioritize
problems/issues and concerns, determine needs and gaps, and try to
Section 12. Ocular Inspection. The PDT/CDT, together with the Council of
Elders/Leaders or their representatives, shall conduct ocular inspection to:
a. Verify traditional, physical and cultural landmarks or boundaries
of
the AD/AL;
b. Determine the existence of boundary conflicts, if any;
c. Verify and confirm the actual location of sacred/worship
places,
burial, hunting, gathering, collecting, fishing grounds and other proofs of long
time possession and ownership within the AL/AD;
d. Ascertain the presence of holders of existing and/or vested
property rights in the applied area. In case there is such a holder, the same
shall be required to submit evidence thereof.
The SPAR shall be submitted within forty five (45) days from the last
activity and shall be accompanied by a copy of the initial compilation of
required proofs gathered and validated.
Within 15 days from receipt of the SPAR, the RRB shall review and evaluate the
same and shall consequently submit a report thereto to the Regional
Director. If the RRB, upon review, finds that the SPAR is insufficient, it shall
inform the PDT/CDT of such insufficiency for the latter to comply or submit
the lacking documents/evidence; otherwise, the RRB shall endorse their
report/evaluation to the RD.
The RD shall, within five (5) days from the receipt of the RRB report,
endorse the same to the
ADO Director for the issuance of WO or SA, as the case may be.
For PDT/CDT members who will not be involved in the actual ground
survey and data processing, they shall proceed to undertake the planning
stage in the ADSDPP formulation, to include IP/AD development framework
formulation, program/project identification and prioritization, taking into
account the interface of IP/AD development framework and already existing
government policies/plans/programs/projects, rules and regulations and
formulation of management plan.
Section 17. Establishment of Project Control and Perimeter Survey. The Survey
Party shall establish project controls. The Perimeter Survey shall be in
accordance with Part II, Rule II, Section 1 of this Rules, and undertaken with
the participation of the duly authorized ICC/IP representative/s.
Section 19.Survey Plan Validation. The survey party and PDT/CDT shall
present the survey plan to the community/applicant or their representative/s,
as well as adjoining/adjacent community/ies or owner/s identifying the
landmarks and actual sites in relation to the boundary corners in the plan for
their validation or confirmation.
Section 22. Approval of the Survey Plan. The ADO shall approve all surveys of
ADs/ALs. The conduct of such surveys by NCIP, cooperating agencies/
institutions or private practitioners must conform to the guidelines provided in
this Rules.
Section 23. The PDT/CDT Report – The PDT/CDT shall prepare a report
describing all the processes conducted and incorporating all supporting
documents relative thereto.
The PDT/CDT shall transmit to the RRB its report after fifteen (15) days from
the last day of publication, if no opposition in due form is received;
otherwise, Section 35 of this Rules shall apply.
Upon receipt of the report, within a period of twenty (20) days, the RRB shall
conduct an initial review and on the basis thereof, schedule a joint conference
to be attended by the concerned PDT/CDT, RRB members and the
concerned ethnographic Commissioner whenever available. The notice for the
joint conference shall include initial findings and recommendations, including
an order directing the PDT/CDT concerned to comply with and submit
additional evidence in case of deficiency.
Within fifteen (15) days after the joint conference, the RRB shall submit its
report to the RD. If the RRB Report indicates the need to submit
additional evidence, the RD shall issue a memorandum to the PDT/CDT to
comply thereto. Upon submission of the compliance, the RRB shall reconvene
to evaluate the sufficiency of the same. If the claim is sufficient as per RRB
report, the Regional Director shall prepare his/her endorsement to the
ADO which shall form part of the Recognition Book.
All reports must be duly subscribed and sworn to, by the members of the team
who prepared the same.
Section 25. Review of Recognition Book. Within fifteen (15) days from
receipt of the endorsement by the RD, the ADO shall review the AD/AL
Recognition Book and transmit a copy of the same to the Legal Affairs Office
(LAO) for review. Should ADO and LAO find the AD/AL Recognition Book
sufficient, the ADO shall endorse the same to the concerned ethnographic
commissioner who shall issue a requisite endorsement to ADO before it can
be considered for deliberation. Upon receipt of a favourable endorsement
from the concerned commissioner, ADO shall notify the PDT/CDT to submit
seven (7) additional certified photocopies of the AD/AL Recognition Book.
Within fifteen (15) days from receipt of the additional copies, the ADO shall
endorse the application to the Commission for deliberation.
Deliberations by the Commission shall consist of three (3) readings. The First
(1st) and the Second (2nd) reading shall be conducted by the Commission
sitting in Division. The First Division shall be composed of Commissioners from
the Ethnographic regions of CAR and Region I, Region II, Region III and Rest of
Luzon, and the Island Groups and Rest of the Visayas. The Second Division
shall be composed of Commissioners from the Ethnographic regions of
Central Mindanao, Southern and Eastern Mindanao, and Northern and
Western Mindanao. Each division shall select its own Presiding Officer for the
1st and 2nd Reading. Each Division shall deliberate such
applications/petitions covering ADs/ALs.
All members of the Commission shall be present during the final deliberation. A
majority vote of all the members of the Commission shall be necessary to grant
or deny an application.
The AD owner/s shall bear the registration fees but shall be exempted from
payment of the
Assurance Fund premium per Memorandum Order No.179, S.2005 of the
Office of the President. In the case of AL, the owner/s shall shoulder all
registration fees including the premium for the Assurance Fund.
After the registration of CADT/CALT by the NCIP, the concerned PO/CDO shall
request from the ROD a certified photocopy of the registered title and
subsequently submit the same to ADO for record keeping.
Section 33. Recording of Approved Survey Plan with the Land Management
Services-DENR Regional Office and Land Registration Authority. Certified copy
of the approved Survey Plans of ADs/ALs with registered title shall be furnished
the LMS-DENR Regional Office and LRA, for incorporation in their projection
map and for records purposes.
Section 34. Filing of Opposition - At anytime during the delineation process but
before the first reading, a verified opposition to the application, attached
to which is a certified copy of documentary evidence including affidavit of
witnesses, if there be any, may be filed with the PDT/CDT, RD or ADO as the
case may be, by one whose interest is affected by the delineation, on any of
the following grounds:
a. Adverse claim;
b. The application is false or fraudulent;
c. The area being claimed or portion thereof, is not an AL/AD; or
d. The area being applied for, or portion thereof, has encroached into
the adjacent or another AL/AD.
Whenever the opposition lodged before the concerned office is disposed of,
the PDT/CDT, RD or ADO Director, as the case may be, shall issue a
certification to the effect that the matter in controversy was already resolved
or that a settlement agreement was reached by the parties, attaching thereto
a copy of the same.
The pendency of the investigation shall not suspend the delineation process.
In no case shall the RHO assume jurisdiction over oppositions pertaining to the
foregoing.
amended list to the PDT/CDT. Any aggrieved person/s may ask for
reconsideration of the above recommendation. Should it be granted, the
original list shall remain, otherwise, the matter shall be subject to conflict
resolution facilitated by the PDT/CDT. If it still remains unresolved, the
person/s concerned may have recourse to remedies allowed under existing
rules.
In no case shall the request for inclusion or exclusion affect the processing of
the application. If after the exercise of diligent efforts, no settlement or
agreement is arrived at, the processing of the application shall be suspended.
Section 39. Initiating the Delineation Process. The concerned PO/CDO shall
constitute the PDT/CDT in accordance with Section 4 of this Rule. The PDT/CDT
shall conduct the initiatory activities as identified in Part I, Rule IV, Sections 5
to 9 of this Rules.
Section 40. Field Validation. The PDT/CDT shall conduct on site validation to
determine the correctness, sufficiency and regularity of the following:
a. Census previously conducted, if any.
b. Consent of the applicant/petitioner to the conversion of their
CADCs/CALCs into CADTs/CALTs.
c. Authority of the representative/s issued by the
community/clan/family in the application/petition for conversion.
d. Proofs and bases of the extent of the claim.
Section 42. Verification Survey and Original Survey. For survey plans
approved by the DENR or LRA (formerly LRC), verification survey shall be
conducted in accordance with Part II, Rule II, Section 3 of this Rules and for
unapproved survey plans and indicative/sketch maps, Part II, Rule II, Section 2
shall apply.
Section 1. Vested and Existing Property Rights. Vested and existing property
rights referred to in Sec. 56 of RA 8371 shall be fully recognized in accordance
with the legal terms contained therein but shall not be a bar to delineation
and recognition of ADs/ALs.
The vested or existing rights of any person within the AD/AL shall be
respected provided, however, that the rights holder shows and submits
proof/s of such rights to the PDT/CDT.
REPUBLIC ACT NO. 8371
228
THE INDIGENOUS PEOPLE RIGHTS ACT OF 1997
RULE VI RESERVATIONS
Section 2. Who are authorized to Conduct Surveys. All AL/AD surveys shall be
conducted by geodetic engineers employed with or contracted by the NCIP or
those under the employ of an agency or organization which has an
agreement with NCIP relative to the delineation process. Geodetic engineers
validly authorized to engage in private practice or members of a partner
agency or organization who desire to conduct the survey of ADs/ALs may be
accredited and authorized by the Commission.
After satisfying all the above requirements, the team shall endorse said
application to the RD for the issuance of the certificate of accreditation. The
regional office shall furnish the ADO copy of all issued accreditations.
Questions/complaints against any accredited geodetic engineer may be raised
within thirty (30) days from issuance of the accreditation before the concerned
RD, whose decision on the matter shall be final.
The bond shall continue to be in force until the surveys are completed and
approved. The bond shall be released if the survey returns are satisfactory.
However, if the ADO director issues an order rejecting or cancelling the
survey on justifiable grounds, such order shall become final after ten (10)
days from receipt by the concerned geodetic engineer, should no
motion for reconsideration be filed by the latter within said period.
requirements. Moreover, the Survey Party must ensure that all survey related
documents not forming part of those submitted by the community/land
owner/claimants must be researched and secured in order to facilitate the
delineation.
c. Survey Notification. All stakeholders shall be notified of the
intended survey in accordance with Part I, Rule IV, Section 20 hereof using ADO
Form No. 08. The notice, signed by the COP and noted by the POr/CDO, shall
state the date/s when the areas may be traversed by the survey team, the
names of the concerned Geodetic Engineers, and shall likewise state Section 56
of R.A. 8371.
d. Mission Planning. During the Mission Planning, the Geodetic
Engineer, together with the PDT/CDT, shall discuss with the stakeholders the
procedures involved in the survey activity and their respective functions and
responsibilities. If the area to be surveyed is located next to another ancestral
domain area, representatives from the adjoining area shall be invited to attend
the Mission Planning.
e. Reconnaissance. A field reconnaissance shall be carried out by
the Survey Team prior to the survey in order to identify the location and
existence of previously established control/reference points and possible
location of project control points to be established and route for the survey.
f. Establishment of Project Controls. In the establishment of project
controls, the Survey Team shall look for existing control/reference points
within or near the ancestral domain/land and thereafter establish new
controls for the ancestral land/domain boundaries. At least two (2)
intervisible control points are necessary in the establishment of control points,
provided, that the distance to be maintained in between each pair of control
points shall not be less than one hundred (100) meters. The survey of project
control is made using survey grade Global Positioning System (GPS) equipment
or conventional survey instruments
Project controls established using GPS must at least comply with the third (3rd)
order positional accuracy requirement set by NAMRIA.
The procedure for review and verification of previously approved survey plans
are as follows:
Section 3. Defective Surveys for Want of Authority. Defective surveys for want
of authority refers to past surveys conducted at the instance of ICC/IP
claimant, undertaken by private geodetic engineers, but without the required
authority from the NCIP or the DENR. Defective Surveys for want of authority
shall be verified by ADO following the process in Part II, Rule II, Section 2, and
if found to be in order, the defect for want of authority shall be cured through
the approval of the plan by ADO. Otherwise, Part II, Rule II, Section 1 of this
rule shall be applied.
Section 3. Level and Standard of Accuracy. Surveys that will require the
use of relative positioning technique shall follow the provisions provided
under Section 47 to 57, Chapter III, Part I of DAO 98-12. For geodetic and
Section 1. Survey Returns. The following documents shall form part of the
survey returns of AL/AD surveys:
a. Transmittal Letter
b. Work Order or Survey Authority
c. Receiving copy of the Survey Notification Letters
d. Original Field Notes, with pagination, the cover of which is dry
sealed by the geodetic engineer, notarized and stamped
e. Original and duplicate copy of the Astronomical Computation
Sheets completely filled up and signed by the geodetic engineer
f. Original and duplicate copy of the Traverse Computation Sheets
completely filled up and signed by the geodetic engineer
g. Original and duplicate copy of the Lot Data Computation Sheets
completely filled up and signed by the geodetic engineer
h. Indicative Maps
i. Monument description sheets
j. Photo documentation of monuments and other survey activities with
caption k. Sketch plan of the survey drawn on appropriate scale l.
Survey plan
m. GPS survey returns signed and sealed by the geodetic engineer n.
Certificate of GPS Data Evaluation issued by the NAMRIA
o. Certified True Copy of Reference Points issued by NAMRIA/DENR
p. Certificate of Equipment Calibration issued by NAMRIA for GPS and
by the NCIP/DENR- LMB for other survey instruments
q. Lot description
r. Notarized documents embodying agreements between and among
the stakeholders relative to the resolution of conflicts
s. Project Completion Report signed by the geodetic engineer/s and
noted by the concerned NCIP Provincial Officer
t. Other related supporting documents
Section 2. Survey Plans. Maps and plans of all AL/AD surveys shall be plotted
on appropriate standard base maps projected upon spheroidal quadrangles
of Clarke’s Spheroid of 1866. The AL/AD survey plan shall contain the
following:
a. Name of Claimants for ALs and Tribe/s for ADs
b. Actual location of the AL/AD, identifying therein the Barangay/s,
Municipality/ies and Province/s covered
c. Area of AL/AD
d. Technical Description
e. System of survey used
f. Scale used
g. Inclusive dates when the survey was undertaken
h. Name and signature of the geodetic engineer who conducted the
survey
i. Name and signature of the Regional Director endorsing the survey
plan
j. Name and signature of the designated geodetic engineer who
verified
the survey returns
k. Name and signature of the Chief of the Recognition Division
recommending the approval of the plan
l. Name and signature of the ADO Director approving the plan
m. Name/s and signature/s of the elders/leaders or representatives as
the case may be
n. Annotations indicating Section 56 of IPRA, authority to execute
survey, description of corners, adverse claims, relation with any cadastral or
public land surveys or reservations, land classification and other information
relevant to the surveyed area.
of stable base and of uniform size prescribed as follows: The sizes of AL/AD
plans are as follows:
Ancestral Domain Ancestral
Land
Size: 100 x 83 cm 74 x 57 cm
Working space: 80 x 80 cm 54 x 54 cm
Title block: 17 x 80 cm 17 x 54 cm
Margin: 1.5 cm 1.5 cm
Section 3. Codes for AL/AD Survey Forms. The Survey Forms shall be identified
using the following codes:
ADO-Form 01 - Survey Plan for AD
ADO-Form 01-A - Survey Plan for AL
ADO-Form 02 - Lot Data Computation Sheet
ADO-Form 03 - Traverse Computation Sheet
ADO-Form 04 - Astronomical Observation
ADO-Form 05 - Field Notes Cover
ADO-Form 06 - Field Notes
ADO-Form 07 - Monument Description Sheet for GPS Controls
ADO-Form 07-A - Monument Description Sheet for Boundary Monuments
ADO-Form 08 - Survey Notification Letter
ADO-Form 09 - Lot Description for Ancestral Lands
ADO-Form 10 - Transmittal of Survey Returns
ADO-Form 11 - Progress Notes of Survey Verification
ADO-Form 12 - GPS Observation/Field Sheets
FINAL PROVISIONS
FINAL CLAUSES
Section 4. Effectivity. This Rules shall take effect fifteen (15) days after its last
publication in a newspaper of general circulation and registration in the Office
of the National Administration Register, U.P. Law Center, Diliman, Quezon City,
Philippines.
Pursuant to Section 44(m), 46(a), 57, 58, 59, and 7 of R.A. 8371, otherwise
known as the Indigenous Peoples Rights Act of 1997, and other related
provisions, the following guidelines are hereby promulgated in lie of NCIP
Administrative Order No. 03, Series of 2002, as follows
Section 1. Title. This Guidelines shall be known as “The Free and Prior Informed
Consent (FPIC) Guidelines of 2006.”
Section 2. Objectives.
a. Ensure genuine participation Indigenous Cultural
Communities/Indigenous People
(ICCs/IPs) in decision-making through the exercise of their rights to Free and
resources therein, and that any alienation or transfer of any of these rights to
entities other than the owner of the ancestral domain shall require the conduct
of the FPIC process.
f. Primacy of Customary Law. The conduct of FBI and FPIC processes
shall recognize the primacy of customs, traditions and practices of the
ICCs/IPs concerned.
g. Sustainable Development and Protection. The FPIC, whenever
given,
shall ensure the
ICCs/IPs concept and requisites of sustainable and responsible development
and protection of ancestral domains shall benefit the present and future
generations.
h. Transparency and Clarity. The process of conducting the FBI and
the FPIC shall be characterized by transparency among stakeholders. All
issuances, orders, decisions of the
Commission relative thereto must be made known to all parties concerned. The
applicants shall make a full and project or activity in a manner that is
both accessible and understandable to the concerned community.
i. Inter-Agency, LGU and NGO/Peoples Organization (PO)
Involvement and Community Support. The collaboration of other government
agencies, local government units, and the involvement of NGOs/Pos duly
accredited by NCIP and authorized by the ICCs/IPs shall be encouraged in order
that their rights shall be promoted and protected.
j. Recognition and Exercise of Ownership Rights over Titled
Properties within Ancestral Domain Areas. Titled property holders with in
ancestral domain areas can exercise all the rights of an owner accorded to the
by law, but the exercise of such rights shall carry with it the responsibility of
respecting the rights of the ICCs/IPs within the domain. If the exercise of such
rights by the titles property owner is such that the rights of the ICCs/IPs can be
adversely affected, consultations among the affected ICCs/IPs shall be
undertaken through their elders/leaders but the subject of the consultation
shall be limited only to the determination and proper compensation through
agreement of the loss, damage or injury that may be suffered, and to the
satisfaction of the ICCs/IPs that measures shall be undertaken to migrate if not
totally avoid such loss, damage or inquiry.
Section 6. Coverage. The FPIC process to be followed will depend on the nature
and extent of the proposed plan, projects, programs or activities sought to be
introduced into any ancestral domain area, as follows:
the NCIP Regional Office having jurisdiction over the area where the project
shall be implemented.
For applications for the conduct of activities affecting the ancestral domain that
do not require a permit, license or agreement from any government
agency/instrumentality, the following documents shall be attached to the
application:
a. Abstract of the project which, among others, enumerates socio-
cultural and economic advantage/disadvantage to the ICCs/IPs.
b. Location/Indicative map of the affected area; and
c. Other relevant documents
In both cases, the FBI team may require additional documents from the
applicant. For juridical entities, proof of their juridical personality is required.
In the event that the Commission officially approves a Master List of Ancestral
Domain Areas, the immediate action to be taken is for the officer duly
designated at the regional office to immediately determine whether the
project site falls within, or overlaps with, a known ancestral domain area as
appearing in the Master List of Ancestral Domains. If there is no overlap, the
procedure provided for in Section 21 hereof shall be followed, otherwise, the
officer aforementioned shall immediately inform the Regional Director in
writing and the procedure provided for in Section 14 hereof shall be followed.
The Regional director shall forthwith notify: a) the applicant that the Pre-FBI
Conference
will be conducted at the Provincial Office at a specified date; and b) the
Provincial Officer concerned that the Pre-FBI Conference will be conducted at
the Provincial Office at a specified date. For Service Centers in Provinces
without Provincial Offices, the Pre-FBI conference shall be held at the Service
Center concerned. The Pre-FBI Conference shall be held within a period of ten
(10) days from receipt of the application or the endorsement.
Section 10. Who Shall Give the Free and Prior Informed Consent. The ICCs/IPs
whose FPIC is required to be secured shall depend upon the area affected as
determined in accordance with the immediately preceding Section. The
following shall likewise to be considered in determining who shall give the
approval/ disapproval:
a. When the area affected covers the entire ancestral domain, the
consent of the concerned ICCs/IPs within the ancestral domain shall be
secured;
b. When the area affected covers only a portion of the ancestral
domain, only the ICCs/IPs in such portion shall be involved in the FPIC process,
or in special cases, whose consent shall be validated;
c. When the area affected covers two or more ancestral domains,
the
ICCs/IPs in each domain shall be separately involved in the FPIC process;
d. When the area affected covers an ancestral domain and an
adjacent
ancestral land, the latter shall be separately involved in the FPIC process;
e. When the area affected covers ancestral domain situated in two or
more regions, the affected ICCs/IPs shall be involved in the FPIC process. In
case of consent, a MOA shall be executed for each ancestral domain affected
unless the ICCs/IPs agree to a joint MOA; and
f. When the area affected covers an ancestral domain situated in
two or more barangays, the assemblies required in Section 26 and 27 of this
Guidelines may be conducted jointly or separately for each barangay. The FBI
team, in consultation with elders/leaders, shall recommend to the FPIC Team
whether to conduct separate or joint assemblies. Nothing in this provision shall
prejudice the rights of persons mentioned in Section 37 and 38 of this
Guidelines.
Section 11. Determination of Area Affected. The FBI Team shall determine the
area affected taking into consideration the following criteria:
a. The impact area as defined by the concerned regulating agency or
the impact area applied to plans, programs, projects or activities that require
Environmental Impact Assessment(EIA) on the basis of the project documents
and the indicative map submitted by the applicant to find out the extent of
coverage of both the area affected and the members of the community whose
consent is to be obtained, the FBI team must seek the opinion/views of
elders/leaders as initially identified by the ancestral domain area
representatives as referred to in Section 13 (d.2) on whether or not the impact
area as determined is acceptable to the community taking into account their
customs, traditions and practices.
b. In case there is no impact area defined by any regulating agency,
FBI Team shall consider the operation plan, indicative map and other project
documents submitted by the applicant. The Team shall likewise consult the
ancestral domain representatives as referred to In Section 13 (d.2).
Section 12. Constitution and Composition of the FBI Team. Within ten (10) days
from the approval of this Guidelines, each Provincial Officer shall forthwith
constitute the FBI Team for each province consisting of at least three (3)
members. Two (2) of whom shall come from the Provincial Office and one (1)
from the Community Service Center (Service Center) concerned or ice versa,
without prejudice to the formation of additional teams and/or substitution of
member/s should need arise. For Service Centers in provinces without
provincial offices, the Regional Director concerned shall cause/order the
constitution of the FBI Team/s from employees of the Service Center
Section 13. Duties and Functions of the FBI Team. The FBI Team shall:
a. Attend scheduled Pre-FBI conference to be presided by the
Provincial Office but prior to the scheduled conference, the FBI Team
assigned shall have gathered already available data and information
needed for the preFBI conference as provided in Section 14 of this
Guidelines.
b. During the Pre-FBI conference, generate the expected
output as
provided for in Section 14 of this Guidelines;
c. Conduct Field Investigation after notifying the ancestral
domain area representatives of the schedule of the conduct of FBI and
requesting for their attendance. The said notice shall contain the date,
venue and time of the meeting and the information that food and
transportation of the attendees will be provided;
d. In the actual conduct of the FBI, confer with the ancestral
domain
area representatives for the purpose of:
d.1. Determining the nature and extent of the plan,
program, project or
activity, the area affected and the number of ICCs/IPs affected in compliance
with Section 11, paragraph (a);
d.2. Listing of elders/leaders with ancestral domain area
representatives as informants. For this purpose the ancestral
domain area representatives shall be as follows: the Consultative
Body representatives for the ancestral domain area as constituted
by the NCIP through NCIP Administrative Order 01, Series of
2003; one (1) IPO representative in the ancestral domain area, if
Section 14. Pre-FBI Conference; Matters to be Taken. The following matters are
to be taken up in the Pre-FBI Conference.
a. Introduction and orientation on the requirements of FBI
process;
b. Introduction of the applicant, proof of legal capacity and the
proposed project;
c. Production of additional project documents when
necessary;
d. Initial determination and approximation of the area
affected;
e. Agreement on the cost of the FBI computed by the Head of
the FBI Team based on the following:
e.1. Food, lodging and transportation expenses of the FBI
Team
members in attending the
Pre-FBI conference;
e.2. Food, lodging and transportation expenses of the FBI
Team for the
duration of the actual conduct of FBI;
REPUBLIC ACT NO. 8371
259
THE INDIGENOUS PEOPLE RIGHTS ACT OF 1997
Section 15. FBI Fee. The FBI Fee to be paid by the applicant shall be assessed in
accordance with the following rules:
i. If no overlap is noted based on the duly approved Master list of
Ancestral Domain Areas, the applicant shall only pay a Certification Fee of Five
Hundred Pesos (Php 500.00), but if an FBI is necessary in order to determine
whether the plan, program, project or activity affects an ancestral domain, the
applicant shall shoulder the agreed cost of the FBI, the amount of which shall
be determined during the Pre-FBI Conference.
ii. If no overlap is noted based on the approved Master list of
Ancestral Domain Areas, and the proposed plan, program, project or activity
falls within the classification requiring the conduct of FPIC process prescribed
under Section and Section 27, the applicant shall pay the agreed cost of
conducting the FBI based on the WFP to be agreed upon during the Pre-FBI
Conference.
iii. If no overlap is noted on a known AD/AL already issued with a
CADT/CALT, FBI is still required for purposes of determining the area affected
and the ICCs/IPs whose consent is to be obtained in accordance with Section 9
of this Guidelines necessary in determining the cost of conducting the FPIC
process. However, in these areas where the plan, program, project or activity
patently affects the entire ancestral domain and the cost can be determined as
well as the requirements of Section 9 of this Guidelines, the conduct of FBI can
be dispensed with and proceed to hold the Pre-FPIC Conference. The
requirements under Section 13. (d.3) hereof requiring the on-site preparation
of WFP bearing the conformity shall likewise be dispensed with.
Section 16. Establishment of Trust Account. Each Provincial Office and Service
Center with no provincial office, shall establish a trust account in an authorized
government depository bank where all FBI and FPIC Fee payments shall be
deposited as Trust Funds.
Upon deposit of the amount determined for FBI or FPIC, as the case
maybe, the disbursing officer shall forthwith prepare the necessary
disbursement vouchers to ensure that the amount is made available with 5
days thereafter.
Section 17. Failure to Appear at Pre-FPIC Conference and Failure to pay FBI.FPIC
Fee; Effect. Should the applicant fail to appear in either the Pre-FBI or Pre-FPIC
Conference, the Provincial Officer or the Service Center Head shall immediately
inform the Regional Director of such fact. The processing of the application and
the period provided thereof, shall be suspended by the Regional Director and
duly recorded, with notice to the applicant, sent through facsimile, registered
mail or messengerial services with proof of receipt or return card . The notice
shall also contain the information that inaction by the applicant with ten (10)
days from the receipt thereof will be deemed as lack of interest on their part
and the Regional Director concerned can already issue the suspension order,
without prejudice the re-opening of the same. Failure on the part of the
applicant to pay the FBI/FPIC fee or comply with the requirements as
agreed upon during the preliminary conference shall likewise result in
suspension as provided in the immediately preceding paragraph. After the
lapse of ten (10) days from the receipt of the Order of Suspension, sent
through facsimile, registered mail or messengerial services with proof of
receipt or return card, the Regional Director shall return the application to the
applicant or to the endorsing regulatory agency, as the case maybe, and a copy
of the application folder archived. Thereafter, other application, if any, may be
given due course. The suspended application maybe re-opened if no other
application is already undergoing the FPIC process, otherwise, the suspended
application will have to await outcome of the ongoing FPIC processing.
Section 19. Contents of the Field-Based Investigation Report. The FBI report
shall contain the following:
a) Narrative of the FBI signed by all members of the Team
containing:
a.1. Inclusive dates when the FBI was conducted;
a.2. Names and designation of members of the FBI Team;
a.3. Specific names of a places actually visited;
a.4. Names of persons interviewed, indicating their positions in
the
community;
a.5. Latest official barangay or municipal census record, or in
their
absence, other available listings;
a.6. Views and opinions of elders/leaders on what should cover
the area affected following Section 11 (1), their approximation of
number of IP household heads within the area affected;
a.7. Initial documentation of concerned ICCs/IPs decision –
making process for purposes of Section 25 of this Guidelines; and
a.8. Recommendations needed for the proper conduct of the
FPIC
proceedings.
b) List of elders/leaders of the affected community;
c) Copy of the latest official barangay or municipal census
record indicating the IP population in the affected area, and/or other
(CNO) coupled with a signed undertaking that the applicant agrees to the
conduct of FBI/FPIC requirement should it be found later that there is, in fact,
an overlap in whole or in part of any ancestral domain/land, a copy of which
shall be furnished to ADO and the concerned Provincial Officer or Service
Center Head, as the case may be.
Section 22. Constitution and Composition of FPIC Team. The FPIC Team
shall be a composed of not more than six (6) members designated by the
Regional Director from the Provincial and/or Service Center personnel which
must include, whenever feasible, the Provincial Legal Officer, one (1)
Engineer from the provincial or regional office, and the least one (1) member
of the FBI Team. The Regional Director and the Chief of Technical
Management and Service Division shall in no case be part of the Team.
Section 24. Validation of the List of Elders/Leaders; When and How. Except in
ancestral domain areas where the elders/leaders are already identified and
recognized by the NCIP as a result of delineation and titling or ADSDPP
formulation activities of the NCIP, the initial identification of elders/leaders by
the FBI Team in accordance with Section 13 (d.2) shall be validated as follows:
prescribed under Section 27, the notice shall call for a First Meeting between
the IP elders/leaders and the applicant.
b. Consultative Community Assembly. The participants to the
CCA
are the elders or leaders, the representatives of IP households/families within
the area affected, the representatives from the applicant, the FPIC Team, the
representatives from development NGOs duly accredited by the NCIP and
authorized by the Community present within the ancestral domain area, if
there are any. After the validation of the list of elders/leaders as prescribed
under Section 24 of this Guidelines, the applicant will be given in the said
assembly. The Operation Plan and the scope and extent of the proposal
shall then presented to the elders/leaders by the applicant for understanding,
and shall given them the needed information supporting their proposal,
including but not limited to: the cost and benefits of the proposal to the ICC/IP
and their ancestral domains, presentation of perceived disadvantage or
adverse effects to the community and the measures adopted by the applicant
to mitigate these. In the discussions to follow, the other representatives will be
given their turn in presenting their views to the proposal for the appreciation
of the council of elders/leaders. The council of elders/leaders shall decide
whether another meeting is necessary to complete the process. For purpose
of paragraph (d) of this section, the elder/leaders, in the present of the
participating household representatives affected by the project, shall make
known to the applicant and to all concerned the decision-making process
adhered to or practiced by the community.
c. Consensus-Building and Freedom Period. After the termination of
the CCA, the community, led by their elders/leaders, shall proceed to consult
among themselves, employing their own traditional consensus-building
processes in order to further discern the merits and demerits of the proposal in
the CCA and to arrive at a consensus. Except for NCIP representatives who shall
document the proceedings, non-members of the IP community are strictly
enjoined from interfering with the consensus-building processes of the
community.
d. Decision Meeting. At the designate date, time, place, a meeting of
the applicant and the elder/leaders facilitated by the FPIC Team, the
elders/leaders will formally convey to the applicant the decision on the
community members affected by the project as a result of the consensus-
building process. If the consensus is favorable, the parties shall proceed to
finalize the terms and conditions of the MOA. If the consensus is against the
project, the leaders or elders will be required to submit their written decision
REPUBLIC ACT NO. 8371
266
THE INDIGENOUS PEOPLE RIGHTS ACT OF 1997
in the form of a Resolution. Further, the applicant may ask the elders/leaders
to explain the decision. If the reason for the denial of the consent is something
the applicant can readily address or a counter-proposal or a new proposal is
made by the applicant, the elders/leaders may require another period, if they
desire so, to reconsider their decision: Provided, however, That any such
extension of the period as consequence of proposal or counter-proposal shall
no exceed fifteen (15) days beyond the 55-day period. In case the decision-
making process is one that requires the participation of the majority members
of the community involved, the decision to accept or reject a particular plan,
program, project or activity shall be determined by raising of hands of
community members in attendance and qualified to vote pursuant to
their custom, tradition or practice. If the decision-making process following
custom and tradition is such that the decision is to be left to the sound
judgment or discretion of elders/leaders, the decision to accept or reject the
plan, program, project or activity by the council of elders/leaders will be
respected, and the vote of the community members is no longer required. In
both situations, the requirement of consensus-building is necessary as
provided in the immediately succeeding paragraph. In this meeting, it is
required from the council of elders/leaders to already designate in writing,
duly signed, who among the members of the council are authorized to
sign/thumb mark the MOA in behalf of the community in case the plan,
program, project or activity is accepted.
The NCIP representatives shall set the mechanisms of the CCA after due
consultation with all parties concerned. The NCIP shall facilitate the conduct of,
and document, the proceedings as well as translate, interpret, clarify or
elaborate matters discussed and provide the participants information on the
pertinent provisions of IPRA. This shall likewise apply to the succeeding section.
give them the needed information supporting their proposal, including but not
limited to: the cost and benefits of the proposal to the ICC/IP and their
ancestral domains,; presentation of perceived disadvantages or adverse effects
to the community and the measures adopted by the applicant to mitigate
these.
b. Consensus-Building. The period between the First and Decision
meeting shall serve as the period for consensus-building among the members
of the council of elders/leaders.
c. Decision Meeting. On or before the 20th day from the date of the
First Meeting; the council of elders/leaders will hold the Decision Meeting with
the applicant at the designated time and place. The council of elders/leaders
will formally convey their decision to the applicant as a result of their
consensus-building process. If the consensus is favorable, the parties shall
proceed to finalize the terms and the conditions of the MOA. If the consensus
is against the project, the leaders or elders will be required to submit their
written decision in form of a Resolution. Further, the applicant may task the
council of elders/leaders to explain the decision. If the reason for the denial of
the consent is something that the applicant ca readily address or a
counterproposal or a new proposal is made by the applicant, the council of
elders/leaders may require another period, if they so desire, to re-consider
their decision but in no case shall it exceed ten (10) days from the time of the
first decision sought to be reconsidered.
Officer/s or Service Center Head/s. as the case may be. Within two (2) days
from receipt, the Regional Director shall direct the Regional Review Team
(RRT), composed of the TSMD chief, Regional Attorney, and another member,
designated by him/her, to evaluate the same within five (5) days after which,
he/she shall notify the applicant in writing of the result, attaching the
Resolution of Non-Consent issued by the community in case of denial or
rejection, and copy furnished ADO, or in case of consent, endorse all
documents relative to the FPIC Process undertaken to the ADO for evaluation
and endorsement to the commission.
The preceding paragraphs shall not apply when it is expressly provided in the
MOA that a new FPIC is required in the event of merger, reorganization,
transfer of rights, and acquisition by another entity, or joint venture.
Even if any an activity is covered under Section 31, 32, 33, 40 and 41, the NCIP
may exercise its injunctive powers upon written complaint of any member of
the affected community to enjoin the conduct or continued implementation of
the program, project, plan or activity on order to safeguard the rights and
interests of the community.
Section 38. FPIC Rights of Resettled, Displaced and Relocated IPs as well as
Migrant IPs Living in Co-existence with the Original IPs within the Domain. In
particular ICC/IP community where there exists resettled, displaced and
reallocated IPs or migrant IPs mingled or co-existence with the owners of the
AD, the right to FPIC of the resettled, displaced and relocated or migrant IPs
will depend on the custom, practice or tradition of the owners of the AD
allowing or disallowing the exercise thereof. Whether allowed or not allowed
by the owners of the AD to participate in the FPIC proceedings, they shall
likewise be entitled to the benefits by virtue of the MOA and to compensation
for damages, loss or injury to them or their properties. The obligation to
compensate the resettled, displaces and relocated IPs or migrant IPs of what is
rightfully due them shall be recognized by the applicant in writing either in the
MOA or in a separate undertaking made as an integral part of the MOA.
Section 41. Academic Research and Research in Aid of Policy. The conduct of
researches herein below enumerated within the ancestral domain may be
allowed or disallowed by the concerned community elders/leaders in
accordance with their customary ways and practices: Provided, That the
research applicant shall notify in writing the concerned Provincial Office prior
to the concerned ICCs/IPs, the research applicant shall obtain a CP from the
concerned Regional Director. The CP shall contain such terms and conditions
provided by concerned ICCs/IPs and/or Regional Director. The CP bearing the
conformity of the ICCs/IPs through their authorized elders/leaders and the
applicant shall constitute the contract between them.
a. Academic Researches – those conducted pursuant to a
scholastic
program and/or researches required to earn a particular academic
accreditations or degree.
b. Researches conducted in Aid of Policy – all researches conducted
for the purpose of developing policies or programs intended for the benefit of
indigenous peoples.
c. Researches necessary to implement the mandates of the NCIP –all
types of researches needed to enforce the mandate of the NCIP including, but
not limited to, those involving delineation of ancestral domains, preparation of
ASDSPP, documentation of customary law.
d. Social Research and Researches on the IP’s Culture and Arts – all
Except for purely news coverage, all video publications of researches under
Section 41 (a) and (d), the applicant must secure the consent of the concerned
elders/leaders as certified by the concerned NCIP Regional Director. The video
to be presented for public view must bear the information that the contents to
be viewed bear the consent of the concerned elders/leaders of the community
being the subject of the video documentation.
Should the duly authorized elders/leaders sign the MOA by affixing their
thumb-marks, a member of the community who knows how to read and write
shall participate as an instrumental witness.
Section 49. Prohibited Acts. After the filing of the application and during the
period that the application is pending, any of the following acts or omissions is
hereby declared either as acts prejudicial to the interest of the IP community in
the attainment of their consent or acts in circumvention of the intent of the
law in requiring the free, prior and informed consent of ICC/IP community and
are therefore prohibited:
a) By the applicant:
1) Employment or use of force, treat, coercion, intimidation, at any
degree or in any manner, including those done by individuals or group of
persons acting for the applicant;
2) Bringing of firearm/s in the community during visits by the
applicant or group of persons acting for the applicant. When needed, armed
security shall be obtained from the local police authorities or the AFO as
requested by the NCIP;
3) Bribery or promise of money, privilege, benefit or reward
other than what is presented by the applicant during the consultative
community assembly/first meeting [Sec. 26(b) and 27 (a)] with the
elders/leaders;
4) Clandestine or surreptitious negotiations with IP individuals, some
members of the community concerned or leaders done, without the
knowledge of the council of elders, leaders or majority of members of the
community;
5) Donations to the community or to any of its member for the
purpose of influencing the decision of the ICCs/IPs.
6) Holding of unauthorized meeting such as but not limited to wining
and/or dining sessions, and the like or such other activities with the NCIP
Official and personnel and/or members of the affected community, with the
Section 50. Sanctions. Sanctions shall be imposed only after due notice and
after the parties are given the opportunity to be heard, as follows:
a) Grave Violation. Commission of any of the prohibited acts by the
applicant/s considered grave violations shall constitute a ground for the
nonissuance of the certificate applied for.
The violation is considered grave when the commission of the prohibited
acts is intentional and has resulted to loss of life or serious damage to property
of an IP member of the community, committed by means of, but not limited to
employment or use of force, threat, coercion, intimidation, violence, including
those done by the individuals or group of persons acting for the applicant,
including repeated commission of prohibited acts considered not grave.
Grave violation shall be a ground for disqualification on the future
applications for certificate precondition within ancestral domain areas, without
prejudice to filling of appropriate criminal action against the offender under
IPRA or the Revised Penal Code and other special laws. The imposition of
disqualification can be lifted only upon petition by the individual or entity upon
whom the disqualification was imposed, stating the grounds why the
disqualification should be lifted. No such petition shall be entertained by the
Commission without the favorable recommendation of the IP community
concerned whose rights were seriously violated;
b) Less Grave Violations. Commission of any prohibited acts by
or
attribute to the applicant, may constitute grounds for the suspension of the
FPIC process by the Regional Director until such time that the violation is
aggrieved party with the RHO for the enforcement of the decision made under
customary laws or for the award of damages. In no case shall the RHO issue an
order or judgment for the suspension of the FPIC proceedings or for the
nonissuance of the certificate applied for, or if already issued, an order or
judgment for its revocation.
The filling of the administrative complaint shall not, as far as practicable stop
the FPIC process or of the processing of the application unless the sanction
calls for it.
after the concerned Regional Director issues the CNO, all petitions involving the
irregularities in the implementation of this Guidelines or those involving the
commission of prohibited acts shall be filed with the Commission through the
Clerk of the Commission, in nine (9) copies, with the original copy indicated as
such, copy furnished the concerned Regional Director. The petition must be
verified and accompanied by sworn affidavits of witnesses, other evidence and
a certification of non-forum shopping executed in accordance with the
requirements of the Rules of Court.
Section 54. Transmittal of Records and Comment. Upon the filling of the
petition, the Clerk of the Commission shall, within three (3) days, direct the
ADO to forward the records of the FPIC applications to the Office of the Clerk of
the Commission or the Regional Director to forward the CNO together with all
accompanying documents within ten (10) days from the receipt of the
directive. Within ten (10) days from receipt of a copy of the petition, the
concerned Regional Director may file a comment to the petition, attaching
therewith such evidence other than those included in the records of the FPIC
application indorsed to the Commission.
Section 55. Summary Proceedings to Resolve Petition. In the course of its
proceedings, the Commission may require the submission of additional
evidence or the conduct of certificatory hearings, after which, the Commission
shall resolve the petition within thirty (30) days from the Order submitting the
case for resolution. Only one motion for reconsideration shall be allowed which
must be file within ten (10) calendar days from the receipt of the decision,
resolution or order, with proof of service that a copy of the motion was
furnished the other parties to the petition.
Section 58. Repealing Clause. This Administrative Order repeals NCIP AO-03,
Series of 2002. The provisions of other Circulars, Memoranda, and
Administrative Orders, issued by this Commission, inconsistent herewith or
contrary to the provisions hereof are hereby repealed or modified accordingly.
Section 59. Effectivity. This Administrative Order shall take effect fifteen (15)
days after its last publication in a newspaper of general circulation and
registration in the Office of the National Administration Register, U.P. Law
Center, Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines.
FACTS:
Petitioners Isagani Cruz and Cesar Europa brought a suit of prohibition and
mandamus as citizens and taxpayers assailing the constitutionality of certain
provisions of R.A 8371 also known as Indigenous Peoples Rights Act (IPRA), and
its Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR). Several groups such as Haribon
ET. Al, and CHR filed motion to intervene which was granted by the court.
ISSUE:
Whether or not the assailed sections of the IPRA law are unconstitutional.
HELD:
The Court was divided equally, where 7 members voted for the dismissal and
the other 7 voting for the grant of petition. As majority was not obtained, the
case was redeliberated upon, However after such redeliberation, the voting
remained, pursuant to the Rules of Court, the petition was dismissed. Thus we
look upon the separate opinions made by Justices Puno, Vitug, Kapunan,
Mendoza and Panganiban to look upon how the issue was addressed in their
opinions.
Loloy Unduran v. Ramon Aberasturi, G.R. No. 181284, October 20, 2015
FACTS:
On March 23, 2004, the rest of the petitioners filed their Motion to Dismiss,
alleging that the RTC had no jurisdiction over the case.
As awardees of a CADT, petitioners argued that NCIP has exclusive and original
jurisdiction over the case, as the subject matter concerns a dispute and
controversy over an ancestral land/domain of Indigenous Cultural Communities
(ICCs)/Indigenous Peoples (IPs).
On July 1, 2004, the NCIP through Atty. Melanie Pimentel, filed a Motion to
Refer the Case to the Regional Hearing Office-National Commission on
Indigenous Peoples (RHO-NCIP), alleging that the RTC had no jurisdiction over
the subject matter.
ISSUE: In resolving the pivotal issue of which between the RTC and the NCIP
has jurisdiction over the respondents' amended complaint.
Court disagrees with their contention that petitioners do not have legal
capacity or standing and locus standi to file the petition, for failure to show
that they are members of IPs/ICCs, or that they are authorized to represent the
Talaandig tribe.
That petitioners are the real parties in interest can be gleaned from the Entry of
Appearance with Motion to Refer the Case to the Regional Hearing Office of
the NCIP filed by the NCIP Special Transition Team-Quick Response Unit
(STRAT-QRU). The STRAT-QRU counsels alleged therein that the respondents'
complaint for recovery of ownership (accion reinvidicatoria) sought to recover
an unregistered real property situated in Miarayon, Bukidnon, from petitioners,
all of whom are, with the exception of Nestor Macapayag and Mark Brazil,
member-beneficiaries of CADT No. R10-TAL-0703-0010 issued by the NCIP in
the name of the Talaandig Indigenous Peoples, located at Talakag, Province of
Bukidnon. In support of their allegation, petitioners presented a certification
that the disputed land is within the area covered by the same CADT, and the
NCIP List of Beneficiaries of Talaandig Ancestral Domain of Miarayon, Lirongan,
Lapok, San Miguel, Talakag, Bukidnon.
Having spelled out the jurisdictions conferred by law to the RTC and the NCIP
over the subject matters of their respective cases, the Court now examines the
allegations in the original and amended complaints to find out which tribunal
may properly exercise jurisdiction over this case.
Respondents traced the provenance of their title over said land to one
Mamerto Decano, a Chieftain of Talaandig tribe, by virtue of a Deed of Sale
executed on July 27, 1957.
The Court therefore finds that the CA correctly ruled that the subject matter of
the amended complaint based on allegations therein was within the
jurisdiction of the RTC.
Contrary to petitioners' contention, the mere fact that this case involves
members of ICCs/IPs and their ancestral land is not enough for it to fall under
the jurisdiction of the NCIP under Section 66 of the IPRA, to wit:
A careful review of Section 66 shows that the NCIP shall have jurisdiction over
claims and disputes involving rights of ICCs/IPs only when they arise between
or among parties belonging to the same ICC/IP.
The qualifying provision requires two conditions before such disputes may be
brought before the NCIP, namely: (1) exhaustion of remedies under customary
laws of the parties, and (2) compliance with condition precedent through the
said certification by the Council of Elders/Leaders.
Thus, even if the real issue involves a dispute over land which appears to be
located within the ancestral domain of the Talaandig Tribe, it is not the NCIP
but the RTC which shall have the power to hear, try and decide this case. The
Court declares Rule IX, Section 1 of the IPRA-IRR, Rule III, Section 5 and Rule IV,
Sections 13 and 14 of the NCIP Rules as null and void in so far as they expand
the jurisdiction of the NCIP under Section 66 of the IPRA to include such
disputes where the parties do not belong to the same ICC/IP.
Engineer Ben Y. Lim, et al. v. Hon. Sulpicio G. Gamosa, G.R. No. 193964,
December 2, 2015
FACTS:
ISSUE:
Does the NCIP have jurisdiction over the subject matter of the instant case?
HELD:
The limited or special jurisdiction of the NCIP, confined only to a special cause
involving ICCs/IPs, can only be exercised under the limitations and
circumstances prescribed by the statute.
Former Chief Justice Reynato Puno, in his separate opinion in Cruz v. Secretary
of Environment and Natural Resources, emphasizes the primacy of customs
and customary law in the lives of the members of the ICCs/IPs:
“Custom, from which customary law is derived, is also recognized under the
Civil Code as a source of law x x x. [I]n the absence of any applicable provisions
in the Civil Code, custom, when duly proven, can define rights and liabilities.
Customary law is a primary, not secondary, source of rights under the IPRA and
uniquely applies to ICCs/IPs. Its recognition does not depend on the absence of
a specific provision in the civil law. The indigenous concept of ownership under
customary law is specifically acknowledged and recognized, and coexists with
the civil law concept and the laws on land titling and land registration.”
Once again, the primacy of customs and customary law sets the
parameters for the NCIP’s limited and special jurisdiction and its consequent
application in dispute resolution. Demonstrably, the proviso in Section 66 of
the IPRA limits the jurisdiction of the NCIP to cases of claims and disputes
involving rights of ICCs/IPs where both parties are ICCs/IPs because customs
and customary law cannot be made to apply to non-ICCs/IPs within the
parameters of the NCIP’s limited and special jurisdiction.
Clearly, the phraseology of “all claims and disputes involving rights of ICCs/IPs”
does not necessarily grant the NCIP all-encompassing jurisdiction whenever
the case involves rights of ICCs/IPs without regard to the status of the parties,
i.e, whether the opposing parties are both ICCs/IPs.
WHEREFORE, the appeal is granted. The NCIP’s Resolution is reversed and set
aside and respondents may refile their complaint against petitioners in a court
of general jurisdiction.
FACTS:
This case involves two parcels of land (subject properties), located and adjacent
to the Sto. Tomas Baguio Road, with areas of 7,860 square meters and 21,882
square meters, covered respectively by Transfer Certificates of Title (TCT) No.
T-29281 and T-29282 registered in the Registry of Deeds of Baguio City both in
the name of petitioner.
Adjudicator ruled in favor of Lorenzo and ruled that the lands are ancestral
lands and the TCTs are null and void because the titles of Tanenglian’s
predecessors in interest were secured by fraud. The decision was affirmed by
DARAB and then the CA thus Tanenglian’s appeal to the SC. He argues that the
DARAB does not have jurisdiction over the controversy and furthermore, that
the declaration of the land as ancestral land was done with grave abuse of
discretion amounting to lack or excess of jurisdiction.
ISSUE:
HELD:
FACTS:
This case involves a conflict of ownership and possession over an untitled
parcel of land located along Km. 5 Asin Road, Baguio City. While petitioners are
the actual occupants of Lot No. 1, respondent is claiming ownership thereof
and is seeking to recover its possession from petitioners. According to
respondent Margarita Semon Dong-E (Margarita), her families ownership and
occupation of Lot No. 1 can be traced as far back as 1922 to her late
grandfather, Ap-ap. Upon Ap-aps death, the property was inherited by his
children, who obtained a survey plan in 1964 of the 186,090-square meter
property, which included Lot No. 1.
The heirs of Ap-ap then executed, for a P500.00 consideration, a Deed of
Quitclaim on February 26, 1964 in favor of their brother Gilbert Semon
ISSUES:
1. Whether the ancestral land claim pending before the National
Commission on Indigenous Peoples (NCIP) should take precedence over the
reivindicatory action.
2. Whether the trial court has jurisdiction to decide the case in light of the
effectivity of RA 8371 or the Indigenous Peoples Rights Act of 1997 at the time
that the complaint was instituted.
HELD:
1. The Court held that a registration proceeding (such as the certification of
ancestral lands) is not a conclusive adjudication of ownership, hence, it will not
constitute litis pendentia on a reivindicatory case where the issue is ownership.
For litis pendentia to be a ground for the dismissal of an action, the following
requisites must concur: (a) identity of parties, or at least such parties who
represent the same interests in both actions; (b) identity of rights asserted and
relief prayed for, the relief being founded on the same facts; and (c) the
identity with respect to the two preceding particulars in the two cases is such
that any judgment that may be rendered in the pending case, regardless of
which party is successful, would amount to res judicata in the other case.The
third element is missing, for any judgment in the certification case would not
constitute res judicata or be conclusive on the ownership issue involved in the
reivindicatory case. Since there is no litis pendentia, there is no reason for the
reivindicatory case to be suspended or dismissed in favor of the certification
case. Moreover, since there is no litis pendentia, we cannot agree with
petitioners contention that respondent committed forum-shopping. Settled is
the rule that forum shopping exists where the elements of litis pendentia are
present or where a final judgment in one case will amount to res judicata in the
other.
2. As a rule, an objection over subject-matter jurisdiction may be raised at
any time of the proceedings. An exception to this rule has been carved by
jurisprudence. The Court ruled that the existence of laches will prevent a party
from raising the courts lack of jurisdiction. Laches is defined as the failure or
neglect, for an unreasonable and unexplained length of time, to do that which,
by exercising due diligence, could or should have been done earlier; it is
negligence or omission to assert a right within a reasonable time, warranting
the presumption that the party entitled to assert it either has abandoned or
declined to assert it. At the time that the complaint was first filed in 1998, the
IPRA was already in effect but the petitioners never raised the same as a
ground for dismissal; instead they filed a motion to dismiss on the ground that
the value of the property did not meet the jurisdictional value for the RTC.
They obviously neglected to take the IPRA into consideration.
Thus, even assuming arguendo that petitioners theory about the effect of IPRA
is correct (a matter which need not be decided here), they are already barred
by laches from raising their jurisdictional objection under the circumstances.
FACTS:
The NCIP, et al moved to dismiss the case on the ground of lack of jurisdiction
of the Malaybalay RTC over the action, pointing out that since the act sought to
be enjoined relates to an official act of the Executive Department done in
Manila, jurisdiction lies with the Manila RTC. The Malaybalay RTC denied the
motion, however, and proceeded to hear CMU’s application for preliminary
injunction. Meanwhile, respondents NCIP, et al moved for partial
reconsideration of the RTC’s order denying their motion to dismiss.
On October 27, 2003, after hearing the preliminary injunction incident, the RTC
issued a resolution granting NCIP, et al’s motion for partial reconsideration and
dismissed CMU’s action for lack of jurisdiction. Still, the RTC ruled that
Presidential Proclamation 310 was constitutional, being a valid State act. The
RTC said that the ultimate owner of the lands is the State and that CMU merely
held the same in its behalf. CMU filed a motion for reconsideration of the
resolution but the RTC denied the same on April 19, 2004. This prompted CMU
to appeal the RTC’s dismissal order to the Court of Appeals (CA) Mindanao
Station. However, the CA dismissed the case ruling that CMU’s recourse should
have been a petition for review on certiorari filed directly with this Court,
because it raised pure questions law—bearing mainly on the constitutionality
of Presidential Proclamation 310. The CA added that whether the trial court
can decide the merits of the case based solely on the hearings of the motion to
dismiss and the application for injunction is also a pure question of law.
ISSUE:
Whether or not PD 310 can validly distribute lands already owned by CMU to
the ICCs/IPs in Musuan, Marang, Bukidnon
HELD:
No, these state colleges and universities are the main vehicles for our scientific
and technological advancement in the field of agriculture, so vital to the
existence, growth and development of this country. It did not matter that it
was President Arroyo who, in this case, attempted by proclamation to
appropriate the lands for distribution to indigenous peoples and cultural
communities. As already stated, the lands by their character have become
inalienable from the moment President Garcia dedicated them for CMU’s use
in scientific and technological research in the field of agriculture. They have
ceased to be alienable public lands.
Besides, when Congress enacted the Indigenous Peoples’ Rights Act (IPRA) or
Republic Act 8371 in 1997, it provided in Section 56 that "property rights within
the ancestral domains already existing and/or vested" upon its effectivity "shall
be recognized and respected." In this case, ownership over the subject lands
had been vested in CMU as early as 1958. Consequently, transferring the lands
in 2003 to the indigenous peoples around the area is not in accord with the
IPRA.
Thomas Begnaen V. Spouses Caligtan, G.R. No. 189852, August 17, 2016
FACTS:
However, instead of abiding by the Order of the RHO, Begnaen filed against the
Sps. Caligtan a Complaint for Forcible Entry with a Prayer for a Writ of
Preliminary Mandatory Injunction before the Municipal Circuit Trial Court
(MCTC) of Bauko-Sabangan, Mt. Province.
Begnaen alleged that he was the owner of a 125 square meter parcel of land
situated in Supang, Sabangan, Mt. Province. He claimed that on two occasions,
respondents - by using force, intimidation, stealth, and threat -entered a
portion of the subject property, hurriedly put up a chicken-wire fence, and
started building a shack thereon without Begnaen's knowledge and consent.
Meanwhile, respondents averred that they owned the area in question as part
of the land they had purchased from a certain Leona Vicente in 1959 pursuant
to age-old customs and traditions. They introduced improvements evidencing
their prior physical possession. Respondents further contended that when
petitioner's father Alfonso Begnaen (Alfonso) was still alive, he had always
respected their boundary wherein a "GIKAD" or old pine tree lumber was
buried and recovered. The "GIKAD" established their boundary pursuant to
age-old Igorot customs and traditions. To further mark their boundary,
respondents also planted bushes and a mango tree, all of which Alfonso had
likewise respected.
RTC reversed and set aside the Resolution and Order of the MCTC, saying that
it was the latter court that had jurisdiction over the case for forcible entry. The
RTC reasoned that the provisions of the IPRA pertaining to jurisdiction do not
espouse exclusivity and thus cannot divest the MCTC of its jurisdiction over
forcible entry and unlawful detainer cases as provided by B.P. Blg. 129.
According to the RTC, IPRA must be read to harmonize with B.P. Blg. 129.
Respondent-appellees then moved for a reconsideration of the above Decision,
but their motion was denied by the RTC . Undaunted, respondents appealed to
the CA.
CA reversed and set aside the RTC rulings and reinstated the Resolution of the
MCTC. In upholding the jurisdiction of the NCIP over the present case, the CA
ruled that the passage of the IPRA has divested regular courts of their
jurisdiction when the parties involved are members of ICCs/IPs and the
disputed property forms part of their ancestral land/domain. Petitioner filed a
Motion for Reconsideration, but it was denied by the CA in its questioned
Resolution.
ISSUE:
HELD:
The Court ruled that the NCIP cannot be said to have even primary jurisdiction
over all the ICC/IP cases. There is no specificity in the grant of jurisdiction to the
NCIP in Section 66 of the IPRA. Neither does the IPRA confer original and
exclusive jurisdiction to the NCIP over all claims and disputes involving rights of
ICCs/IPs.
The implementing rules and regulations of a law cannot extend the law or
expand its coverage, as the power to amend or repeal a statute is vested in the
legislature. Indeed, administrative issuances must not override, but must
remain consistent with the law they seek to apply and implement. They are
intended to carry out, not to supplant or to modify, the law.
At best, the limited jurisdiction of the NCIP is concurrent with that of the
regular trial courts in the exercise of the latter’s general jurisdiction extending
to all controversies brought before them within the legal bounds of rights and
remedies.