CONSTTITUTIONAL EXPLOITAION

THE NATURE OF PERCEPTION AND TAUTOLOGICAL NATURE OF HABITS in law

Penumbra

Wittgenstein Builder

It is vocal and not verbal.

To say this is to make a point about the learning of the term in education and in ostension

To say that language is enclosed within stimulus and response and not total perception-action is to
say that whatever we are doing is creating stimulus an dealing with it only as we build up any system
be it mathematical or real.

The actual and total perception of the event is not entirely available to epistemology what is left to it
is again enclosed within the stimulus or languages because that is the nature of stimulus, it is an
ecological phenomenon

Creating one’s own stimulus would be a non-touchstone prospect only if the goal of epistemology
was anything more than survival of the species but the activity of knowing is not mostly concerned
with the touchstone and yet the activity of knowing is not the only activity happening.

Observational concept cannot be extended to those instances where the stimuli itself is situated or
created for observation. Raftopoulos continuously falls for such stimulus. Peacocke might have
prepared for all kinds of stimuli but again when do we perceive a stimuli without a background
principle, a principle starting from evolutionary to social influences. When does a perceiver just
receive the stimuli except in armchair? Observables are delineated whilst observations delineate,
where and when does the observer and the observed meet outside conception?

The problem with created stimulus is then to make a causally satisfying artifact which ‘satisfies’ the
position scenario in the first place. Otherwise, the nature of epistemic project is in danger. All these
deliberations will come under observation creating the observables, the cogs of the artifact and
truth is always ascertained. The problem is that the stimulus is basically ecological and unfortunately
so are we.

Not only this it has to further face the challenge of theoretical indeterminacy. Same set of data can
bring about multiple theories but if we have already measured the stimuli, in other words, created it
or had it created by experts, where is the proto propositional content other than in the mysterious
laboratory somewhere on the armchair?

Not just the state but the content itself enters there. Problems are start for Raftopoulos. Peacocke
awaits a scolding.

The notion of poverty in relation with stimulus is grounded in the faults of empiricism project