Baihaqi Faizin.

Sm
016201800008
Diplomacy 2

1. Persuasive diplomacy aims to increase recognition of maritime power and build

national authority on the international stage. It is not intended to attack potential
adversaries as it aims to entice the other party with an effective military presence.
Because of this, persuasive maritime diplomacy closely resembles what was once
known as “showing the flag”, where naval vessels were used only to influence other
countries' policies. Coercive maritime diplomacy is an open form by showing the
threat or use of limited sea power by state or non-state actors designed to force
opponents to retreat or act as a
deterrence in achieving political goals. The easiest way to approach topics that
resemble coercive maritime diplomacy is gunboat diplomacy, which pursues
diplomacy through naval capabilities. Here, the role of the Navy, coast guard and all
marine powers is a state tool used for the benefit of maritime operations and maritime
diplomacy.

First, encouraging the use of limited forms of certain forms of maritime power which
are necessary to build diplomatic influence.

Second, building confidence (confidence building measure).

Third, build multilateral coalitions that allow countries to work together.

2. A refugee is forced to flee for their lives. An immigrant chooses to move to another
country.

Refugees are forced to leave their home countries because of war, environmental
disasters, political persecution and/or religious or ethnic intolerance. They come to the
United States with a special immigration status that gives them automatic admission
into the country and helps them connect with family members who are already in the
country. This status also provides them with a “green card” or a permit to work.
Refugees are “invited” to live in the United States to start a new life.
 Immigrants and refugees have a good deal in common. They experience new cultures
and languages. They are often ethnic minorities who might face open discrimination
or other forms of hostility, regardless of their immigration status.

3. The revelation of worthwhile gas and oil saves underneath its waters can possibly
reshape the territorial geostrategic construction and usher in another time in relations
between the nations that line it, particularly notwithstanding expanded rivalry and
ocean scarves. It's a unique that bears some comparability to the contention in Asia's
South China Sea. In the South China Sea, the improvement of mixture fighting
activities zeroed in on coastguard strengthening and the framing of maritime local
armies. Based on an amazing conciliatory military part by a significant state (China in
the SCS; Turkey in the Mediterranean), which drives the close by forces to react by
improving their common collaboration, there is a broad shoreline locale that is
principally significant for worldwide exchange and is helped by being wealthy in
assets. Likened to the activity of China in the SCS, Turkey may assemble its oceanic
law uphold units, make sea volunteer armies, set up calculated/military offices
(specifically in Northern Cyprus, which as of now has military units) and do moves of
terrorizing to impact the area, harvest its assets, and try not to be dodged by the
development of another line
4. Including Turkey is a wise option
Turkey and the TRNC have made three major steps to protect their sovereign rights,
including military intervention, stopping foreign operations and preventing attacks into
the region from the North on Turkish oil companies, according to Emre Iseri and Ahmet
Cagri Bartan, researchers from Yasar University. Turkey in the Izmir Province.

Israel, Greece develop strategic relationsAfter successfully terminating the Israel-Turkey

gas pipeline project, Greece then developed a strategic relationship with Israel.EastMed
pipeline eligibility Regarding the viability of the EastMed pipeline, even former Cypriot
Minister of Foreign Affairs and Trade Nicos Rolandis said investors would not take the
risk of investing in a pipeline that is threatened and mired in controversy.

5. First, the South China Sea is a water area with rich natural resource potential (SDA),
especially oil and other energy sources, with several island clusters scattered around
it, which are competing for the mutual claims of several countries around the region,
such as China. (People's Republic of China –RRC), Vietnam, Philippines, Taiwan,
Malaysia, and Brunei Darussalam.

Second, because it is located in the crossing route for international ships passing
through the Strait of Malacca, one of the busiest in the world, and is the trade link
between Europe to Asia and America to Asia and vice versa, through the territorial
waters of countries in the least 3 important regions, namely Southeast Asia, East Asia
and Asia-Pacific, so, apart from claiming countries, countries located around the
South China Sea, such as Indonesia and Singapore, even the United States (US), have
an interest at all times over maintained stability and security in the South China Sea

third, the rapid economic growth in Asia, especially China, and on the other hand, the
continuing decline in growth in Europe and the US, has made many countries seek to
gain control over or fight over this strategic and dynamic marine area, namely the
South China Sea. Both China and the US in this matter seek to secure their energy
security interests, by trying to control the water areas that were previously
compromise acceptable through diplomatic channels, official / formal or informal /
informal, to be jointly controlled through efforts self-restraint avoids provocation and
offensive by armed forces in the sea waters, but now tends to be violated by show of
force initiatives and the need to show a balanced reaction, and in fact, there are
countries that have started to try to use threats and subtle intimidation and use force.
physically (military) in the field, individually (unilaterally) or together in groups
(allied).