Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sukhamrit Singh
Section-A
LL.B(H) (2018-2021)
Q1. Sir what is the origin of trusts?
A1. There is confusion about the origin of trusts and trust law as we know it comes from England but
some say that, the English borrowed it form the Romans. The general idea is that It is an English
common law concept to do with the crusades when the knights left their land in the hands of trusted
people in case they never returned from battle." The ‘trusted people’ (usually the church who
turned out to be very untrustworthy and kept a lot of it for themselves) having an obligation to pass
on the land to the rightful heir, but this is just superficial knowledge of trusts. In fact, it can be
argued that the trust concept did in fact have its origins in Roman civil law and that the trust-like
devices that developed through the common law of England actually originated in Rome.
Roman law has the notion of trustees, and of trustee duties and obligations, with respect to property
in the form of two trust-like devices, fideicommissum and fiducia.
Also, it didn’t have to be the specific property, provided they passed on value – something you can
see in a modern day trust with a portfolio of shares, for example, and a trustee’s power of
conversion.
There were two types of fiducia and you will immediately see a likeness to modern day.
The fiducia cum amico under which property was transferred to a friend e.g. for safekeeping until
the transferor returned (which sounds like a knights conveyance of land and castle to a friend while
off on a crusade to me); and the fiducia cum creditore under which property was transferred to a
creditor as security for performance of some obligation, subject to being re-transferred to the
transferor on completion of the obligation (seen as security for a bank loan today perhaps).
The transferee had to take reasonable care of the property and to account for any profits arising
from the property, while the transferor had a right to compensation if the transferee refused to re-
transfer the property or gave it to another person
A2. Trust property refers to assets that have been placed into a fiduciary relationship between a
trustor and trustee for a designated beneficiary. Trust property may include any type of
asset, including cash, securities, real estate, or life insurance policies. Trust property is also referred
to as "trust assets" or "trust corpus.
Trustor is also known as author of trust, who reposes the trust. Trustee is the person who accepts
the confidence. Instrument through which trust is conveyed in know an instrument of trust
Definition of trust according to Indian Trust Act 1882- Section 3. A “trust” is an obligation annexed to
the ownership of property, and arising out of a confidence reposed in and accepted by the owner, or
declared and accepted by him, for the benefit of another, or of another and the owner
2. Private Trusts
Trusts are generally formed or created to fulfill any or more of the following objectives, the list not
being Exhaustive:
1. For discharge of the charitable and/or religious sentiments of the author of settlor of the
trust, in a way that ensures public benefit
2. For claiming exemption from Income tax U/s 10 or 11, as the case may be, in respect of
incomes applied to charitable or religious purposes
3. For the welfare of the members of the family and/or other relatives, who are dependent on
the settlor of the trust
5. For regulating the affairs of a provident fund, superannuation fund or gratuity fund or any
other fund constituted by a person for the welfare of its employees
The Indian Trusts Act can only deal with the creation, management and extinguishment of Private
Trusts
The creation of trust is contingent on the premise that it made for a lawful purpose. To know lawful
purpose one has to look into the statute (S4) It is a negative definition and tells that every purpose is
lawful except those expressly mentioned to be unlawful, they being:
1. Forbidden by law {carrying on smuggling and support settlor’s children out of the proceeds}
2. If permitted, would defeat provisions of any other law {Trust disposing of property contrary
to S114 Indian Succession Act}
3. Fraudulent
4. Injuring the property or person of another
5. Against Public Policy or Morality according to the Court {training female foundlings as
prostitutes}
India S.5. Deals with the creation of trust , being a distinct way for the creation of a trust of movable
property and immovable property
A rule was device in the English case of Knight v. Knight which laid down that three things are
necessary for the creation of a trust
1. Certainty of words/intention
2. Certainty of subject-matter
3. Certainty of Object
1.Certinity of Intention- the words used to construe a trust must be imperative. If intention can be
made out that a trust was t be created then no particular form of expression in necessary. A term
trust might not even be used in a trust deed yet a trust may exists as court look at the intent rather
than the form. If the intention to create a trust, the purpose of it, the beneficiaries to it, and the
trust property is indicated by the settlor along with the transfer of trust property to the trusty with
certainty then a trust has taken form.
2. Certainty of Subject Matter- property of any kind whether movable or immovable can be subject
matter of the trust but a mere beneficial interest under a subsisting trust can’t be subject matter in
India (U.K it can) as in India equitable interest is not recognized. A trust of ‘mere expectancy’ of
property not transferable under S.6 of Transfer of property Act is not possible in India like:
1. Spes Sucessionis
2. A public office
3. Pay of public office
4. Right to sue
5. Future Maintenance
3.Certanity of object (S.8)- Certainty of object or the beneficiaries is also necessary for the validity of
a trust except when it for charity . A uncertain non charitable trust is non est.
Example of non certainty of object (property) is- A bequeaths certain property to B, desiring him to
divide the bulk of it among C’s children. This does not create a trust, for the trust-property is not
indicated with sufficient certainty.
Example of Certainty of object is- A bequeaths certain property to B, “having the fullest confidence
that he will dispose of it for the benefit of C. This creates a trust so far as regards A and C.
In Bhaidas v. Bai Gaulam, a hindu testator bequeathed his estate to wife as sole executrix, making
her owner and laid condition that whatever remained of property would go to the testators 2
daughters, as the executrix may like. The trust for daughters failed as the subject matter was
uncertain because of the words ‘whatever may remain’.
Who may create Trust (S.7)
The capacity to create trust is co-extensive with that of holding, acquiring and disposing a legal or
equitable interest in property and can be done by
1. Sui juris person a person competent to contract ie a person u/s 11 of Indian Contract act
Every person is age of majority according to the law to which he is subject , and who is of
sound mind and is not disqualified from contracting by any law to which he is subject
2. A minor or on his behalf, with permission of a principal court of original jurisdiction
A person is free to accept trusteeship but not bound to accept it. Acceptance can be made by words
or acts that certify such acceptance by certainty.
Instead of accepting a trust, the intended trustee may within a reasonable time disclaim it and it
shall be prevent the vesting of such property in him.
Upon a bare perusal of S60 of the Act it tacitly recommends those persons who are incapable of
prudent administration & protection of property and it is the right of the beneficiary to have the
property well protected, preserved and administered . The following persons cant be trustees:
Where the directions of the Author of trust are illegal, impracticable or manifestly injurious to the
beneficiaries, they need not be obeyed. Where the beneficiaries are competent to contract they may
make a departure from the original direction if they collectively consent to do so.
( E.g. A, a trustee of certain land for X, Y and Z, is authorised to sell the land to B for a specified sum.
X, Y and Z, being competent to contract, consent that A may sell the land to C for a less sum. A may
sell the land accordingly).
The court can also permit such departure and where the trustee is a minor an application can be
made to the court for such consent.
It is the fundamental duty of a trustee to follow the directions of the settlor & the purpose of the
trust. ( E.g. A, a trustee for B and her children, is directed by the author of the trust to lend, on B’s
request, trust-property to B’s husband, C, on the security of his bond. C becomes insolvent and B
requests A to make the loan. A may refuse to make it)
S11 lays down a principle, a trustee is to execute the trust as far as practicable, for the benefit of the
cestui que trust (beneficiaries), the beneficiaries can if all of them are sui juris and of common
consent then the will of the author can be overshadowed and beneficiaries can control the trust
In an English case, it was held that the Civil Court can permit departure from the trustors directions,
when
1. Circumstances exists that which were unforeseen by the author and hence are not provided
for
2. Where trustees are embarrassed by emergency
3. When consent of all beneficiaries can’t be taken as not all are competent to contract (sui
juris) or aren’t in existence
E.g.1 A, living in Calcutta, is a trustee for B, living in Bombay. A remits trust-funds to B by bills drawn
by a person of undoubted credit in favour of the trustee as such, and payable at Bombay. The bills
are dishonoured. A is not bound to make good the loss.
E.g.2 A, a trustee of two debts for B, releases one and compounds the other, in good faith, and
reasonably believing that it is for B’s interest to do so. A is not bound to make good any loss caused
thereby to B.
The trustee is to employ the highest degree of integrity and a reasonable standard of efficacy of
business in the management of the affairs of the trust and if he fails to do so he will be put under
onerous personal liability.
E.g.1. A, a trustee directed to sell the trust-property by auction, sells the same, hut does not
advertise the sale and otherwise fails in reasonable diligence in inviting competition. A is bound to
make good the loss caused thereby to the beneficiary
E.g.2 A, a trustee for B, in execution of his trust, sells the trust-property, but from want of due
diligence on his part fails to receive part of the purchase-money. A is bound to make good the loss
thereby caused to B.
E.g.3 A, a trustee for B of a policy of insurance, has funds in hand for payment of the premiums. A
neglects to pay the premiums, and the policy is consequently forfeited. A is bound to make good the
loss to B
Where an intention can be inferred from the trust deed that the trust property is to be enjoyed in
specie, then it shall be enjoyed in that sense only, but where so such intention is expressed it is the
duty of the trustee to convert the perishable property into a permanent nature so that profits from
it can be realised forthwith.
The rules governing investment are on the principle to strike a balance between provision of income
on the tenant with the life tenant and the preservation of the capital for the remainderman.
E.g. A bequeaths to B all his property in trust for C during his life, and on his death for D, and on D ’s
death for E. A’s property consists of three leasehold houses, and there is nothing in A’s will to show
that he intended the houses to be enjoyed in specie. B should sell the houses, and invest the
proceeds in Government Securities of the Central Government.
E.g. A, a trustee for B, C and D, is empowered to choose between several specified modes of
investing the trust - property. A in good faith chooses one of these modes. The Court will not
interfere, although the result of the choice may be to vary the relative rights of B, C and D.
When a time is specified for the selling of securities it should be done so with that period, unless a
valid and justifiable reason to act otherwise, and if the trustee sells it beyond the specified time, the
burden of proof that the beneficiary has not been prejudiced is on the trustee to show. If a Court
gives the nod to sell securities beyond specified time, the burden of proof of showing prejudice
rests on the beneficiary.
E.g. A bequeaths property to B, directing him with all convenient speed and within five years to sell
it, and apply the proceeds for the benefit of C. In the exercise of reasonable discretion, B postpones
the sale for six years. The sale is not thereby rendered invalid, but C, alleging that he has been
injured by the postponement, institutes a suit against B to obtain compensation. In such suit the
burden of proving that C has not been injured lies on B.
A breach of trust arises and consists of an Improper act, neglect, default, omission in respect of
beneficiaries interest or trust property.
Where the trustee commits a breach of trust, he is liable to make good the loss which the trust-
property or the beneficiary has thereby sustained. However if the loss sustained to the property or
beneficiary is due to fraud induced by the beneficiary, the beneficiary has concurred on the breach
or has reluctantly accepted the breach then the trustee shall not be liable.
Depending upon the type of breach the trustee is liable to be paying interest as penalty either by
simple interest (where he has actually received interest, exception delay in paying trust money)
& in some cases compound interest (failure to apply trust money into securities)
E.g The instrument of trust directs the trustee to invest trust-money in any of such securities and to
accumulate the dividends thereon. The trustee disregards the direction. He is liable, at the option of
the beneficiary, to be charged either with the amount of the principal money and compound
interest, or with the amount of such securities as he might have purchased with the trustmoney
when the investment should have been made, together with the amount of the accumulation which
would have arisen from a proper investment of the intermediate devidends.
In cases where there are more than one transactions and a loss results in one and gain in another, a
trustee can’t set of the loss from the gain obtained in another transaction , however if the loss
sustained and the gain accrued are arising from the same transaction then the same is liable to be
adjusted
Except
The trustee paying on behalf of remaining trustees can compel the other to make good such loss
sustained by trustee.
Conclusion
The Trust is a creation of law where even after the transfer of property the transferor can exercise
his will over the subject property and can also rule over the property after his death which is
contrary to the concept of rule against alienation, an ideology behind Transfer of Property Act,
Trusts can ensure that assets are professionally managed across generations and distributed in line
with the grantor’s intentions. Trusts can, among other things, remove assets from one’s estate, carry
out charitable intent, reduce income taxes, protect beneficiaries from spendthrift propensities,
protect assets from becoming marital property in a divorce, protect assets from creditors, and
provide lifetime income to one or more beneficiaries while providing the remainder interest to
another generation of beneficiaries.
Role of a trustee is a pivotal one but he is overburdened, after discussing the provisions of the
aforesaid sections